Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2014 Jul 12;6(3):169–182. doi: 10.1007/s12609-014-0155-y

Therapeutic Considerations in Treating HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Ciara C O’Sullivan 1, Karen L Smith 2
PMCID: PMC4180403  NIHMSID: NIHMS613103  PMID: 25285186

Abstract

Despite advances in detection and treatment, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains the second highest cause of cancer-related death for women in the United States. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is amplified in 25–30% of breast cancers and is associated with aggressive disease and, historically, with poorer outcomes. The advent of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody to HER2, revolutionized the management of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) in the metastatic and adjuvant settings. However, relapse despite adjuvant trastuzumab and resistance to trastuzumab in the metastatic setting remain substantial clinical problems for many patients with HER2-positive BC. As such, analyzing the mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance and developing new therapy to overcome trastuzumab resistance are research priorities. There has been progress, with the approval of three additional HER2-targeted agents in the last six years: lapatinib, pertuzumab, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). Other HER2-targeted therapies, including neratinib and afatinib, are in clinical development, and trials of novel agents such as heat shock protein-90 (HSP90) inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, and HER2-targeted vaccines are ongoing. In addition to developing new therapy, research is addressing several unique challenges in the management of HER2-positive MBC. In this article, we discuss advances in the treatment of HER2-positive MBC, with a focus on novel HER2-targeted therapy and HER2-targeted agents recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Additionally, we also address the management of brain metastases (BM) and hormone receptor (HR) - positive, HER2-positive MBC.

Keywords: trastuzumab, metastatic breast cancer, lapatinib, pertuzumab, adotrastuzumab emtansine, brain metastases

Introduction

Although breast cancer outcomes have improved, MBC remains incurable, with 40,000 women expected to die from MBC in the United States in 2014[1]. Approximately 25–30% of BC is HER2-positive, which predicts more aggressive disease and response to HER2-targeted therapy [2]. HER2-positivity is defined by evidence of protein over-expression (measured by immunohistochemistry) and/or by evidence of gene amplification (measured by HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio on in situ hybridization) [3•]. Whereas HER2-positive BC was historically associated with poor prognosis[2, 46], the development of HER2-targeted therapy beginning with trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody to HER2, has resulted in dramatically improved overall survival (OS) for women with HER2-positive MBC and HER2-positive early-stage BC[7, 8].

Despite the overall success of trastuzumab in treating HER2-positive MBC, approximately 70% of patients become resistant to therapy within one year (secondary resistance)[9] and approximately 35% do not respond to trastuzumab at all (de novo resistance)[10, 11]. There are several potential mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab therapy [9], but there are no established biomarkers predictive of resistance to trastuzumab [12]. Continuation of trastuzumab beyond progression is beneficial for some patients [13], however there is a clear need for other treatment options. Since 2007, three new HER2-targeted therapies (lapatinib, pertuzumab and T-DM1) have been licensed by the FDA for use in HER2-positive MBC. Multiple clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of newer HER2-targeted therapies and novel agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), PI3K inhibitors, HSP90 inhibitors, and HER2-targeted vaccines are currently ongoing (Table 1). In this review we describe important developments in the treatment of HER2-positive MBC, ongoing research to improve outcomes for this subgroup of BC patients and remaining challenges.

Table 1.

Key agents currently approved or under investigation for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC

Agent Mechanism of
action
FDA approved
indications
Examples of key ongoing studies
evaluating the agent in HER2-positive
MBC
Trastuzumab mAB to HER2 Adjuvant Breast Cancer
  • -

    For HER2-overexpressing node-positive BC, or HER2-overexpressing node-negative BC that is ER/PR negative or has one high-risk feature

  • -

    In combination with multi-agent chemotherapy consisting of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel or docetaxel, or with docetaxel and carboplatin

  • -

    As monotherapy after multi-agent anthracycline-based chemotherapy


Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • -

    In the first line setting in combination with docetaxel or paclitaxel and pertuzumab for patients with HER2-overexpressing MBC

  • -

    As monotherapy for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer in patients who have been treated with ≥ 1 lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting [14]


  • -

    In combination with eribulin as 1st line therapy for patients with advanced HER2+ BC [NCT01269346][15] (Phase II)

  • -

    In combination with carboplatin and vinorelbine in advanced HER2+ BC [NCT00431704][16](Phase II)

  • -

    In combination with paclitaxel versus trastuzumab, lapatinib and paclitaxel for patients with advanced HER2+ BC [NCT01526369][17] (Phase III)

Lapatinib Dual TKI of EGFR and HER2 Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • -

    Combined with capecitabine for patients who have advanced or MBC whose tumors overexpress HER2, and have previously been treated with an anthracycline, a taxane and trastuzumab

  • -

    Combined with letrozole for the treatment of postmenopausal women with ER+ BC that also overexpresses HER2 and for which endocrine therapy is required[18]

  • -

    In combination with everolimus in patients with advanced HER2+ BC [NCT01283789][19] (Phase II)

  • -

    In combination with cabazitaxel in patients with HER2+ MBC and BM [NCT01934894][20](Phase II)

  • -

    In combination with Myocet after progression on trastuzumab and taxanes [NCT01495884][21](Phase I/II)


Pertuzumab

Inhibits HER2/HER3 hetero-dimerization
Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • -

    In combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel for the treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing MBC who have not received prior chemotherapy or HER2-targeted therapy in the metastatic setting.


Neoadjuvant Treatment of Early Stage Breast Cancer
  • -

    In combination with docetaxel and trastuzumab for patients with HER2-overexpressing, locally advanced, inflammatory or early stage BC (≥2cm in diameter or node-positive) as part of a complete treatment regimen for early BC [22].


  • -

    In combination with trastuzumab and AI in patients with ER/PR+ HER2+ advanced BC (1st line setting)[NCT01491737][23](Phase II)

  • -

    In combination with trastuzumab and either paclitaxel, docetaxel, or nab paclitaxel in patients with HER2+ advanced BC [NCT01572038][24] (Phase III)

  • -

    In combination with trastuzumab and eribulin in patients with advanced HER2+ MBC [NCT01912963][25](Phase II)

T-DM1 Targeted intracellular delivery of cytotoxic DM1 Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • -

    As monotherapy in the treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing MBC who previously received either trastuzumab or a taxane, either separately or in combination.

  • -

    Patients should either have a)received prior therapy for metastatic disease or b) relapsed within 6 months of completing adjuvant therapy[26].

  • -

    In combination with abraxane and lapatinib in patients with HER2+ MBC [NCT02073916][27](Phase I)

  • -

    HER2 imaging study to identify patients with HER2+ MBC unlikely to benefit from T-DM1.[NCT01565200] [28](Phase II)

Neratinib TKI,HER2 and HER4 inhibitor
  • -

    Not FDA approved

  • -

    For patients with HER2+BM [NCT01494662] [29](Phase II)

  • -

    In combination with capecitabine or lapatinib in patients with HER2+ MBC who have progressed on ≥2 lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting [NCT01808573][30](Phase III)

Afatinib Irreversible dual HER1/HER2 inhibitor
  • -

    Not FDA approved

  • -

    Monotherapy/combined with vinorelbine in patients with HER2+ BM [NCT01441596] [31](Phase II)

  • -

    Patients with MBC who have progressed on one line of trastuzumab based treatment [NCT01125566][32](Phase III)

MM-111 Biospecific antibody which forms a trimer with HER2 and HER3, preventing HER3 signaling
  • -

    Not FDA approved

  • -

    In combination with trastuzumab in patients with advanced HER2+ BC[NCT01097460][33](Phase I)

  • -

    In combination with various chemotherapy agents and HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2+MBC[NCT01304784[34](Phase I)

AUY922 Hsp90i
  • -

    Not FDA approved

  • -

    In combination with trastuzumab for patients with advanced HER2+ BC progressing on prior trastuzumab[NCT01271920][35](Phase II)

XL147 PI3K inhibitor
  • -

    Not FDA approved

Everolimus mTOR inhibitor
  • -

    Not FDA approved for HER2+ MBC

  • -

    Combined with vinorelbine and trastuzumab for HER2+ BM[NCT01305941][36](Phase II)

  • -

    Combined with paclitaxel and trastuzumab for HER2+ MBC[NCT00876395][37](Phase III)

Bevacizumab mAB to VEGF
  • -

    Not FDA approved for HER2+ MBC

  • -

    Combined with capecitabine and trastuzumab in patients with advanced HER2+ BC[NCT00811135][38](Phase II)

Vaccines against HER2-overexpressing BC Generate immunogenicity against HER2+ cell Not FDA approved
  • -

    Combined with trastuzumab in HER2+ MBC[NCT01570036][39](Phase II)

  • -

    Combined with cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ high risk/MBC[NCT00847171][40](Phase II)

Abbreviations Used in Table 1:

mAB- monoclonal antibody; HER2- human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ET-endocrine therapy; ER- estrogen receptor; PR-progesterone receptor; HR-hormone receptor; AI-aromatase inhibitor, BM-brain metastases; MBC-metastatic breast cancer ; EGFR- epithelial growth factor receptor; TKI-tyrosine kinase inhibitor;HER3; human epidermal growth factor receptor 3; HER2+- HER2-positive; TKI- tyrosine kinase inhibitor; HER1-human epidermal growth factor receptor 1; Hsp90i- Hsp90 inhibitor; VEGF- vascular endothelial growth factor; PI3K-phosphatidyl-3-kinase inhibitor; mTOR-mammalian target of rapamycin; BC-breast cancer

Molecular Biology of HER2

HER2 is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR or ErbB) family of receptor tyrosine kinases (TK), including four structurally related HER proteins - HER1 (EGFR, ErbB1), HER2, HER3 (ErbB3) and HER4 (ErbB4) – which all have a function in controlling cell growth, proliferation and survival. HER2, which is encoded by the HER2 proto-oncogene on chromosome 17, is a 185 kDa membrane-spanning protein composed of a ligand-binding extracellular domain (ECD), an α-helical transmembrane segment, and an intracellular TK domain [4143]. Homo- or heterodimerization of the HER receptors results in downstream intracellular signaling via canonical pathways that mediate cell growth and proliferation: -- the PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, the Akt pathway and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Unlike the other HER proteins, HER2 has no known ligand and exists in a constitutively open conformation, making it the preferred partner for heterodimerization with other HER proteins. The formation of HER2 heterodimers (e.g.HER2/HER3) is more effective than the formation of HER2 homodimers in promoting carcinogenesis by activating ligand-initiated intracellular signaling via the MAPK/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways [44](Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Targeted therapies and the HER2 pathway.

Figure 1

The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family consists of four members: the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or HER1, as well as HER2, HER3, and HER4, which are transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases that control cell growth survival, differentiation, and migration as well as other cellular responses. Of note, HER2 has no known ligand that triggers its activity, and HER3 predominantly functions as a ligand-activated dimer partner for other members of the HER2 family. Activation of these receptors promotes tumor growth by triggering signaling through commonly used growth factor pathways such as RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR. The use of targeted therapies to block these pathways is being explored with a view to improving HER2 targeted therapies and overcoming resistance to trastuzumab.

Legend: TRAS- trastuzumab; PER; pertuzumab; LAP- lapatinib; AFA- afatinib; NER- neratinib; PI3K- phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; EVE-everolimus; mTOR-mammalian target of rapamycin; TEM-temsirolimus; P-phosphate; HSP-heat shock protein; T-DM1-ado trastuzumab emtansine

As described above, although trastuzumab has significantly improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive MBC, the median duration of response is less than one year [45]. Determining the molecular mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab has been difficult, but potential mechanisms of resistance include up-regulation of the PI3K pathway, accumulation of p95-HER2 (a truncated form of the HER2 receptor), and increased signaling from HER family receptors and the insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R)[46].

FDA -approved therapy for HER2- positive MBC

Trastuzumab

Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to domain IV of the juxta-membrane region of the ECD of HER2. Its mechanisms of action include inhibition of intracellular signaling, inhibition of angiogenesis, inhibition of ECD cleavage, increased intracellular HER2 degradation and activation of antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)[47].

In a pioneering trial, Slamon et al. compared combined chemotherapy and trastuzumab with chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC. Findings revealed improved response rate (50% vs. 32%; p< 0.001), duration of response (9.1 months vs. 6 months; p <0.001), time to progression (TTP) (7.4 months vs. 5.6 months; p <0.001) and median overall survival (OS) (25.1 months vs. 20.3 months, p= 0.01) with the combination [7]. Since this trial, trastuzumab has been safely combined with multiple different chemotherapy agents for the treatment of MBC [13]. Additionally, several large adjuvant trials revealed that addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy for early-stage HER2-positive BC resulted in an approximately 50 % reduction in relapse and 30 % reduction in fatality [8, 4853].

Cardiotoxicity, most frequently presenting as a decline in ejection fraction [54], is the most significant toxicity associated with trastuzumab. Pre-clinical models of mice with cardiac-restricted deletion of HER2 revealed dilated cardiomyopathy [55]. Based on concern about cardiac toxicity during the initial clinical trials of trastuzumab, an independent Cardiac Review and Evaluation Committee was convened and their analysis confirmed a risk of heart failure, with the highest rates associated with concurrent administration of trastuzumab and anthracycline (27%) and lower rates with concurrent trastuzumab and taxanes (13%) or trastuzumab alone (3 –7%)[56]. More recent data evaluating cardiac toxicity revealed asymptomatic declines in ejection fraction in approximately 25 % of patients and symptomatic declines in ejection fraction in approximately 4 –5% of patients [4853, 57].

Most women receiving trastuzumab for MBC will ultimately develop resistance. Preclinical data suggests that withdrawal of trastuzumab can result in rapid tumor cell re-growth [58, 59], implying that trastuzumab-resistant tumors may still be dependent on HER2 TK-mediated signaling [10]. On this basis, the German Breast Group 26/Breast International Group 03–05 trial was designed to investigate whether trastuzumab should be continued beyond clinical progression [13]. Patients with HER2-positive MBC who had progressed on trastuzumab-based treatment were randomized to capecitabine monotherapy or to capecitabine plus trastuzumab. Although there was no difference in OS between the two groups, response rates were higher for the capecitabine-plus-trastuzumab group (27 % vs. 48.1 % respectively, odds ratio, 2.50; p= 0.0115), supporting the practice of continuing trastuzumab beyond progression [13].

Lapatinib

In 2004, Burris et al. reported that lapatinib, a dual EGFR/ErbB-2 TKI, inhibits tumor cell growth in vitro and in xenograft models of several human tumors[60]. Lapatinib blocks HER1 and HER2 TKs to the same extent, but its efficacy is limited to HER2-positive tumors [61, 62]. Unlike trastuzumab, lapatinib can cross the blood- brain barrier (BBB) and therefore has a therapeutic effect on intracranial metastases [63, 64]. In a pioneering trial, Geyer et al. randomized women with HER2-positive MBC who had previously received anthracycline, taxane and trastuzumab therapy to capecitabine alone or to capecitabine plus lapatinib. Median TTP was longer for the combination group than the monotherapy group (8.4 vs. 4.4 months, p <0.001) and there was a trend towards improved OS with the combination (p =0.177). In addition, fewer patients presented with brain metastases (BM) at first progression in the combination group [65, 66]. Burstein et al. conducted a phase II trial of lapatinib monotherapy for heavily pretreated patients with MBC. No patients with HER2-negative disease responded; however in the HER2-positive cohort, three patients had a complete response (CR) and three patients had a partial response (PR), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.1 weeks and OS of 29.4 months. Of note, all the HER2-positive patients received prior trastuzumab [67].

Pre-clinical studies noted a synergistic interaction between lapatinib and trastuzumab in ErbB2-positive cell lines, suggesting that dual HER2 blockade may be more effective than single agent blockade [61]. Additionally, cross-resistance between lapatinib and trastuzumab is incomplete, suggesting mechanisms of resistance to these drugs may differ[46]. The EGF104900 trial compared lapatinib alone with lapatinib plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive, trastuzumab-refractory MBC. In this heavily pre-treated population, a 4.5 month survival advantage was associated with dual HER2-targeted therapy [68, 69]. This finding laid the groundwork for future studies evaluating dual HER2-targeted therapy and suggested that HER2-targeted therapy alone (i.e. without chemotherapy) can be an option for HER2-positive MBC.

Unlike trastuzumab, lapatinib is rarely associated with cardiac toxicity[70], a finding which may be explained by the fact that trastuzumab has a greater effect on calcium handling, reduction of HER2 protein levels, and increasing of HER2 mRNA levels than does lapatinib [7173]. Also, most studies of lapatinib were performed on women who had previously received trastuzumab, a group likely to have relatively normal cardiac function. Overall, the main toxicities associated with lapatinib are mild diarrhea and rash [74].

Pertuzumab

Pertuzumab, a humanized monoclonal IgG antibody, binds to domain II of the HER2 ECD and inhibits HER2-dimerization [7576]. Pre-clinical trials revealed synergy between pertuzumab and trastuzumab [7781], a finding that was confirmed in a phase II trial evaluating pertuzumab and trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive MBC who had progressed on prior trastuzumab-containing regimens [82]. Notably, response rates for pertuzumab monotherapy are low [75].

The pioneering CLEOPATRA trial evaluated first-line docetaxel and trastuzumab with either placebo or pertuzumab for 808 women with HER2-positive MBC. PFS was longer for the pertuzumab group (18.5 months vs.12.4 months, p<0.001). As of the most recent analysis, median OS was 37.6 months for the placebo group and had not yet been reached for the pertuzumab group (p=0.0008)[83•,84]. Trials evaluating pertuzumab in combination with other agents for first-line and later-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC are ongoing [248587]. Pertuzumab is generally well tolerated, with the most common toxicities including rash, diarrhea, mucositis, and febrile neutropenia when combined with chemotherapy and trastuzumab [88]. Importantly, there is no increase in cardiotoxicity when pertuzumab is combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel compared with trastuzumab and docetaxel without pertuzumab [89, 90].

Ado- trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)

T-DM1 is a novel antibody-drug conjugate composed of a potent cytotoxic drug, emtansine, connected to trastuzumab via a stable linker, enabling targeted delivery of chemotherapy to HER2-positive cells [91]. The phase III EMILIA trial randomized patients previously treated with chemotherapy and trastuzumab to T-DM1 or to lapatinib plus capecitabine. Median PFS was 9.6 months with T-DM1 compared with 6.4 months with lapatinib plus capecitabine (p<0.001), and median OS at the second interim analysis crossed the stopping boundary for efficacy favoring T-DM1 (30.9 months vs. 25.1 months, p< 0.001) [92•].

T-DM1 is associated with minimal toxicity, however patients may develop thrombocytopenia and/or elevated liver enzymes [92•]. Ongoing studies further evaluating use of T-DM1 for HER2-positive MBC include the MARIANNE trial, assessing T-DM1 in combination with pertuzumab for first- line treatment, and the TH3RESA trial, which recently reported preliminary findings indicating improved PFS and overall response rate (ORR) with T-DM1 for patients who had received ≥ 2 prior HER2-targeted therapies[87, 93].

Investigational agents

Multiple new agents are currently under investigation for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC.

Small Molecule HER Family Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Neratinib

Neratinib is an oral, irreversible inhibitor of HER1, HER2, and HER4 TK activity. Based on promising pre-clinical and phase I results [94,95], a single agent phase II study of neratinib for patients with advanced HER2-positive MBC was conducted. For patients who had been previously exposed to trastuzumab, median PFS was 22.3 weeks compared to 39.6 weeks for patients who were trastuzumab naive. The most common grade III and/or IV adverse event was diarrhea, which occurred in 30 % of patients who had prior trastuzumab and 13 % of patients who had not received prior trastuzumab [96]. A small trial evaluating the combination of neratinib and capecitabine revealed an impressive response rate of 50 % among patients previously treated with taxane and trastuzumab therapy [97]. Important ongoing trials are evaluating neratinib in multiple clinical settings, including in combination with temsirolimus for first line treatment of HER2-positive MBC, in combination with capecitabine for previously treated patients and, since neratinib crosses the BBB, for the treatment of progressive BM in patients with HER2-positive MBC [29, 98, 99]. The most frequent adverse events associated with neratinib to date include diarrhea and rash [96].

Afatinib

Afatinib is an oral, irreversible pan-HER TKI which, like other small molecular anti-HER2 TKIs, crosses the BBB [100]. Phase I studies revealed that the most frequent toxicities associated with afatinib are diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, rash, and fatigue [101]. Early efficacy results for afatinib are promising, with a phase II study involving 41 patients who had progressed on trastuzumab obtaining PR and stable disease (SD) for 11 % and 37 % of patients, respectively [102]. The Lux-Breast trials are currently evaluating afatinib in additional clinical settings. In the phase III Lux-Breast I trial, patients with HER2-positive MBC who have progressed on trastuzumab are randomized to vinorelbine plus trastuzumab or to vinorelbine plus afatinib[103]. The Lux-Breast II trial is evaluating the efficacy of afatinib monotherapy for patients who have progressed on prior trastuzumab and/or lapatinib [104]. And, the Lux-Breast III trial is evaluating afatinib monotherapy or afatinib plus vinorelbine compared with the investigators’ choice of treatment for patients with HER2-positive MBC and progressive BM who have progressed on prior trastuzumab or lapatinib based therapy[105]. In addition to the Lux-Breast trials, afatinib is being evaluated by other trials in combination with endocrine therapy [106], and in combination with trastuzumab or lapatinib [107,108].

Investigational antibodies

MM-111

MM-111 is a bio-specific antibody, an artificial protein composed of fragments of two different monoclonal antibodies, which can bind two different kinds of antigen [109]. MM-111 forms a trimeric complex with HER2 and HER3, resulting in inhibition of HER3 signaling. In preclinical models, MM-111 had anti-tumor activity against tumors dependent on HER2 overexpression[110]. It has been proposed that blockade of both HER2 and HER3 may be a more effective method of treating HER2-amplified tumors than HER2 blockade alone [111]. There is an ongoing phase I trial of MM-111 and trastuzumab for patients with trastuzumab- refractory HER2-positive MBC [112]. In addition, NCT01304784 is a phase I and pharmacological study of MM-111 in combination with multiple treatment regimens for patients with advanced HER2-positive solid tumors [34].

PI3K inhibitors and mTOR Inhibitors

Somatic mutations which activate the PI3K- Akt- mTOR pathway are present in >50 % of BC, providing a sound rationale for evaluating inhibitors of this pathway for BC treatment [113]. Because PI3K is downstream from HER2 and mTOR is downstream from PI3K, targeting this pathway may be an important step in overcoming trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive BC. The PI3K inhibitors under development are classified by mechanism of action, i.e. pure PI3K inhibitors, compounds which block both PI3K and mTOR (dual inhibitors), pure catalytic mTOR inhibitors, and inhibitors which block Akt [114]. XL147 selectively inhibits the class I PI3K family and, on the basis of promising pre-clinical efficacy, has been evaluated in phase I clinical trials, where it has revealed an acceptable safety profile. On the basis of encouraging preclinical data, a phase I and II study of XL147 in combination with trastuzumab or paclitaxel and trastuzumab was conducted on patients with HER2-positive MBC who had progressed on a prior trastuzumab -containing regimen; results are awaited [115]. The pan-class-1 PI3K inhibitor, BKM120, is also under investigation in a phase I trial evaluating its efficacy in combination with trastuzumab for patients with advanced HER2-positive BC who have progressed on a trastuzumab-based regimen[116].

The largest trials evaluating mTOR inhibition in HER2-positive MBC include the BOLERO-1 and BOLERO-3 trials. The phase III BOLERO-1 trial, which has completed accrual, compares paclitaxel and trastuzumab with or without everolimus for first-line treatment of women with HER2-positive MBC [117]. Preliminary results of the BOLERO-3 trial, evaluating vinorelbine and trastuzumab with or without everolimus for treating HER2-positive MBC which has progressed on taxanes and trastuzumab therapy, were presented in 2013[118]. Median PFS for the everolimus group was seven months, compared with 5.78 months for the placebo group (HR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.65, 0.95; p = 0.0067). OS data are not yet mature. Although the results of BOLERO-3 are proof of principle for the use of mTOR inhibition to overcome trastuzumab resistance, it is uncertain that these results will be clinically significant given the small increase in PFS and the additional toxicity. Other phase I and II trials are investigating the efficacy of PI3Kis as monotherapy or in combination with endocrine therapy or HER2-targeted therapy [113]. Whether all patients with HER2-positive MBC or solely those with PI3K mutations derive benefit from these agents remains to be confirmed [114].

HSP90 inhibitors

The chaperone protein HSP90 interacts with client proteins in the cell cycle, including HER2, and potentiates the action of antineoplastic agents including trastuzumab [119]. Pre-clinical studies suggest that the combination of HSP90 inhibitors and trastuzumab can overcome resistance to trastuzumab monotherapy. Several HSP90 inhibitors have been evaluated in phase I and II trials; however, the development of some of these compounds, including geldanamycin, has been limited because of toxicity [120]. Tanespimycin/17-AAG is a derivative of geldanamycin, which has similar efficacy but reduced toxicity. A phase II trial conducted on patients with HER2-positive MBC obtained promising results, with an ORR of 22 % and a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 59 % [121]. The most common toxicities were grade I and included diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and headaches, but development of tanespimycin/17-AAG was halted in 2008 because of production problems. Alvespimycin is a water-soluble derivative of geldanamycin. A phase I trial of this agent combined with trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive MBC noted an ORR of 6.25 % and SD of 18.75 %; however, concerns regarding ocular toxicity precluded further clinical development [122]. Retaspimycin in combination with trastuzumab was evaluated in a phase II trial on a similar patient population and had modest clinical activity with an ORR of 5 % and SD of 70 %. The most common toxicities were grade I and II, including fatigue (49 %), nausea (31 %) and diarrhea (23 %)[123]. Another HSP90 inhibitor, ganetespib, is under evaluation in the first-line setting for patients with HER2-positive MBC in a phase II trial (ENCHANTTM)[124]; results to date noted modest activity in patients with HER2-positive MBC, with an ORR of 6.7% and SD obtained for 33.3 % of patients. Grade III and IV events included hypopituitarism, diarrhea and aphasia [125]. AUY922 is a potent small-molecule synthetic HSP90 inhibitor with promising clinical activity. A phase Ib and II trial is ongoing evaluating the combination of AUY922 and trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive MBC who have progressed on prior trastuzumab-based therapy[126].

Anti-angiogenic agents

Bevacizumab

Bevacizumab, a recombinant recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and inhibits angiogenesis, which is necessary for tumor growth and survival. HER2 overexpression is associated with increased VEGF expression and pre-clinical evidence suggests that the HER2 and VEGF signaling pathways are linked in human BC [127], thus providing the rationale for evaluating anti-angiogenic therapy for HER2-positive BC. Based on promising phase I and II data combining bevacizumab with chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy [128,129], the AVEREL study compared bevacizumab, docetaxel and trastuzumab with trastuzumab and docetaxel alone for first-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC [130]. Disappointingly, no difference in PFS or OS was observed with the addition of bevacizumab. Further evidence of the lack of benefit of adding anti-angiogenic therapy to chemotherapy plus trastuzumab comes from the recently presented findings of the adjuvant BETH trial in which bevacizumab did not confer additional benefit when added to chemotherapy and trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive early BC[131].

Vaccine therapy

On the basis of the observation that patients can spontaneously develop anti-HER2 specific immunity with high levels of humoral and cellular immunity, HER2 is one of the most suitable targets for immunotherapy in BC [132]. Types of vaccine therapy presently under evaluation include peptide-based, protein-based, DNA based, whole tumor cell-based and dendritic cell-based compounds. A phase I and II study evaluated the combination of trastuzumab and a HER2 peptide-based vaccine for 22 pre-treated patients with HER2-positive MBC[133]. Treatment was well tolerated, with a median PFS of 17.7 months, which compared favorably with results achieved with standard therapy for this population. E75 is an immunogenic peptide from the HER2/neu protein, which is strongly expressed in BC [134]. Benavides et al. studied the combination of trastuzumab and the E75 vaccine, which was safe and immunologically beneficial [135]. A Phase I trial assessed the combination of an allogeneic HER2-positive granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) secreting breast tumor vaccine with trastuzumab and cyclophosphamide. Twenty-two patients with HER2-positive MBC were enrolled and no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were noted; the clinical benefit rate at six and 12 months was 50 % and 35 %, respectively [136]. Another trial evaluated the combination of a DNA vaccine, low-dose IL-2, and GM-CSF in combination with trastuzumab for eight patients with HER2-positive MBC; low levels of toxicity and a strong therapeutic antibody response were noted, and two patients are long-term survivors [137]. Although available immunotherapy is safe and tolerable, there have been no direct comparisons with standard therapy for HER2-positive BC. Therefore, it remains to be seen whether meaningful clinical responses, as defined by an improvement in OS compared with that obtained by standard therapy for HER2-overexpressing BC will be observed [132].

Predictive biomarkers for HER2 targeted therapy

Biomarker analysis of patients with HER2-positive MBC has failed to identify any marker that enables better refinement of therapy than HER2 itself. However, data suggests that the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive MBC treated with trastuzumab is significantly worse for patients with PI3KCA mutations [138]. Therefore PI3KCA mutational status may confer poor prognosis for patients with HER2-positive MBC, and patients may be suitable candidates for clinical trials of HER2-targeted agents in combination with PI3K inhibitors or mTOR inhibitors [139•]. A prospective analysis of 737 patients enrolled in the GeparSixto and GeparQuinto trials noted that patients with PI3KCA mutant, HER2-positive, HR-positive BC are resistant to chemotherapy and dual HER2-targeted therapy, which implies that PI3KCA mutational status is also predictive of response to treatment [140]. Biomarker analysis from EMILIA revealed that patients with PI3KCA mutations treated with lapatinib and capecitabine had an inferior median PFS and OS; however, the presence of PI3KCA mutations did not significantly affect outcome for patients treated with T-DM1[141].

Special Clinical Considerations in the Management of HER2-positive MBC

Brain Metastases

Unfortunately, BM occur in approximately 30 – 55% of patients with HER2-positive MBC [142], with data suggesting that BM may be particularly common in patients previously treated with adjuvant trastuzumab for early stage HER2-positive BC[143]. Small molecule TKIs which cross the BBB are a potentially promising new addition to standard therapy for BM in HER2-positive MBC patients. For example, the single-group, multicenter phase II LANDSCAPE trial evaluating the combination of capecitabine and lapatinib for patients with HER2-postive MBC and untreated BM revealed a 65.9 % objective CNS response rate[144]. An ongoing clinical trial is evaluating the efficacy of neratinib for patients with HER2-positive BM (NCT01494662)[29].

Management of Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-positive MBC

The role of endocrine therapy for treating HR-positive, HER2-positive MBC is not well defined, because the decision is often made to use chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy because of an aggressive clinical course. However, preclinical data suggests that HER2 -targeted therapy can overcome endocrine resistance in HR-positive, HER2-positive BC [145]. The TAnDEM study evaluated anastrozole and trastuzumab versus anastrozole alone for treating postmenopausal women with HR and HER2-positive MBC [146]. Median PFS was improved with the combination (5.6 versus 3.8 months (log-rank p=0.006), however, no benefit to OS was noted, possibly because 70 % of patients in the anastrozole- alone group crossed over to trastuzumab after progression. Lapatinib has also been evaluated in combination with endocrine therapy on the basis that cross- talk between the EGFR and estrogen-receptor pathways can cause endocrine resistance. In a phase-II trial on post-menopausal, HR-positive women with HER2-positive MBC, the addition of lapatinib to letrozole significantly reduced the risk of disease progression compared with letrozole alone (median PFS 8.2 vs.3.0 months)[147].

Conclusion

Overall, there has been rapid progress in the treatment of HER2-positive MBC, and it is likely that further practice-changing developments will occur. Dual HER2-targeted therapy has been a powerful addition to the treatment options, but the appropriate combination and sequencing of the newer agents with more established HER2-targeted therapy is still not fully defined. However, the American Society of Clinical Oncology recently released clinical guidelines based on currently available data which provide recommendations for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC in first- and later lines of care using the array of currently available HER2-targeted therapy [148•]. As we move forward, identification of predictive biomarkers will be crucial in further refining treatment options and more knowledge of mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab will help identify new targets. Unique challenges of managing HER2-positive MBC include the treatment of HER2-positive BM, and management options for patients who have HR-positive and HER2-positive MBC. Several compounds are in different stages of clinical development, and it remains to be seen which of these agents will affect the swiftly changing therapeutic options for HER2-positive MBC.

Footnotes

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. O’Sullivan and Dr. Smith have nothing to disclose,

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance

  • 1.Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan;64(1):9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):177–182. doi: 10.1126/science.3798106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3997–4013. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984. 2013 updated guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer
  • 4.Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Litton JK, Broglio KR, Meric-Bernstam F, Rakkhit R, Cardoso F, et al. High risk of recurrence for patients with breast cancer who have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, node-negative tumors 1 cm or smaller. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(34):5700–5706. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andrulis IL, Bull SB, Blackstein ME, Sutherland D, Mak C, Sidlofsky S, et al. neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Apr;16(4):1340–1349. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chia S, Norris B, Speers C, Cheang M, Gilks B, Gown AM, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression as a prognostic factor in a large tissue microarray series of node-negative breast cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5697–5704. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:783–792. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, Suman VJ, Geyer CE, Jr, Davidson NE, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1673–1684. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nahta R, Yu D, Hung MC, Hortobagyi GN, Esteva FJ. Mechanisms of disease: understanding resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in human breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006 May;3(5):269–280. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Garrett JT, Arteaga CL. Resistance to HER2-directed antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors: mechanisms and clinical implications. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011 May 1;11(9):793–800. doi: 10.4161/cbt.11.9.15045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilken JA, Maihle NJ. Primary trastuzumab resistance: new tricks for an old drug. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Oct;1210:53–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05782.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stern HM. Improving treatment of HER2-positive cancers: opportunities and challenges. Sci Transl Med. 2012 Mar 28;4(127):127rv2. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.von Minckwitz G, Schwedler K, Schmidt M, Barinoff J, Mundhenke C, Cufer T, et al. Trastuzumab beyond progression: overall survival analysis of the GBG 26/BIG 3-05 phase III study in HER2-positive breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Oct;47(15):2273–2281. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Herceptin package insert. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2000/trasgen020900LB.htm.
  • 15.Eribulin With Trastuzumab as First-line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2 Positive Breast Cancer; NCT01269346. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.04.004. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.VinCaT: Vinorelbine, Carboplatin and Trastuzumab in Advanced HER2 Positive Breast Cancer; NCT00431704. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 17.A Randomized Study of TH versus THL in First Line Treatment of HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (TH vs THL); NCT01526369. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 18.Lapatinib package insert. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/022059s007lbl.pdf.
  • 19.Lapatinib and RAD-001 for HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer; NCT01283789. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 20.Cabazitaxel Plus Lapatinib as Therapy for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With Intracranial Metastases; NCT01934894. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.03.004. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.The Myocet/Lapatinib Study. ICORG 10-03, V5; NCT01495884. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 22.Perjeta package insert. http://www.gene.com/download/pdf/perjeta_prescribing.pdf.
  • 23.A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Trastuzumab Plus an Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Metastatic HER2-positive Breast Cancer; NCT01491737. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 24.A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Herceptin (Trastuzumab) and A Taxane in First-Line Treatment in Patients With HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer (PERUSE); NCT01572038. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 25.Phase II Study of Eribulin Mesylate, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab in Women With Metastatic, Unresectable Locally Advanced, or Locally Recurrent HER2-Positive Breast Cancer; NCT01912963. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 26.Kadcyla package insert. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/125427lbl.pdf.
  • 27.TDM1 With Abraxane and Lapatinib for Metastatic HER2 Positive Breast Cancer (STELA); NCT02073916. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 28.HER2 Imaging Study to Identify HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Unlikely to Benefit From T-DM1 (ZEPHIR); NCT01565200. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 29.HKI-272 for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases; NCT01494662. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 30.A Study of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in Patients With HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Received Two or More Prior HER2 Directed Regimens in the Metastatic Setting (NALA) NCT01808573. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 31.Lux-Breast 3; Afatinib Alone or in Combination With Vinorelbine in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Positive Breast Cancer Suffering From Brain Metastases; NCT01441596. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 32.LUX-Breast 1: BIBW 2992 (Afatinib) in HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients After One Prior Herceptin Treatment; NCT01125566. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 33.MM-111 in Combination With Herceptin in Patients With Advanced HER2 Amplified, Heregulin Positive Breast Cancer; NCT01097460. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 34.A Study of MM-111 in Combination With Multiple Treatments in Patients With HER2 Positive Cancer; NCT01304784. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 35.Combination of AUY922 With Trastuzumab in HER2+ Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Previously Treated With Trastuzumab; NCT01271920. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov;
  • 36.A Study Of Everolimus, Trastuzumab And Vinorelbine In HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases; NCT01305941. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4852-5. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Everolimus in Combination With Trastuzumab and Paclitaxel in the Treatment of HER2 Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (BOLERO-1); NCT00876395. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 38.A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Herceptin (Trastuzumab) and Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer; NCT00811135. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 39.Combination Immunotherapy With Herceptin and the HER2 Vaccine NeuVax; NCT01570036. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 40.Trastuzumab, Cyclophosphamide, and Vaccine Therapy in Treating Patients With High-Risk or Metastatic Breast Cancer; NCT00847171. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 41.Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, et al. Studies of the HER2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989;244:707–712. doi: 10.1126/science.2470152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sarup JC, Johnson RM, King KL, Fendly BM, Lipari MT, Napier MA, et al. Characterization of an anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody that stimulates receptor function and inhibits tumor cell growth. Growth Regul. 1991 Jun;1(2):72–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tzahar E, Waterman H, Chen X, Levkowitz G, Karunagaran D, Lavi S, et al. A hierarchical network of interreceptor interactions determines signal transduction by Neu differentiation factor/neuregulin and epidermal growth factor. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Oct;16(10):5276–5287. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.10.5276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Way TD, Lin JK. Role of HER2/HER3 co-receptor in breast carcinogenesis. Future Oncol. 2005 Dec;1(6):841–849. doi: 10.2217/14796694.1.6.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, Snyder R, Mauriac L, Tubiana-Hulin M, et al. Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;23(19):4265–4274. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Saini KS, Azim HA, Jr, Metzger-Filho O, Loi S, Sotiriou C, de Azambuja E, et al. Beyond trastuzumab: new treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast. 2011 Oct;20(Suppl 3):S20–S27. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(11)70289-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chung A, Cui X, Audeh W, Giuliano A. Current status of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapies: predicting and overcoming herceptin resistance. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013 Aug;13(4):223–322013. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N, Pienkowski T, Martin M, Press M, et al. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1273–1283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Spielmann M, Roche H, Delozier T, Canon JL, Romieu G, Borgeois H, et al. Trastuzumab for patients with axillary-node-positive breast cancer: results of the FNCLCC-PACS 04 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6129–6134. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, Jeong JH, Davidson NE, Geyer CE, Jr, et al. Four-year follow-up of trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: joint analysis of data from NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(25):3366–3373. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.0868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, de Azambuja E, Procter M, Suter TM, et al. 2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Sep 21;382(9897):1021–1028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61094-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Joensuu H, Bono P, Kataja V, Alanko T, Kokko R, Asola R, et al. Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide with either docetaxel or vinorelbine, with or without trastuzumab, as adjuvant treatments of breast cancer: final results of the FinHer Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5685–5692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE, Gralow JR, Kaufman PA, Visscher DW, et al. Sequential versus concurrent trastuzumab in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 1;29(34):4491–4497. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pinto AC, Ades F, de Azambuja E, Piccart-Gebhart M. Trastuzumab for patients with HER2 positive breast cancer: delivery, duration and combination therapies. Breast. 2013 Aug;22(Suppl 2):S152–S155. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Crone SA, Zhao YY, Fan L, Gu Y, Minamisawa S, Liu Y, et al. ErbB2 is essential in the prevention of dilated cardiomyopathy. Nat Med. 2002 May;8(5):459–465. doi: 10.1038/nm0502-459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Seidman A, Hudis C, Pierri MK, Shak S, Paton V, Ashby M, et al. Cardiac dysfunction in the trastuzumab clinical trials experience. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1215–1221. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Guarneri V, Lenihan DJ, Valero V, Durand JB, Broglio K, Hess KR, et al. Long-term cardiac tolerability of trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 1;24(25):4107–4115. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.9551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pietras RJ, Pegram MD, Finn RS, Maneval DA, Slamon DJ. Remission of human breast cancer xenografts on therapy with humanized monoclonal antibody to HER-2 receptor and DNA-reactive drugs. Oncogene. 1998 Oct 29;17(17):2235–2249. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pegram MD, Konecny GE, O'Callaghan C, Beryt M, Pietras R, Slamon DJ. Rational combinations of trastuzumab with chemotherapeutic drugs used in the treatment of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 May 19;96(10):739–749. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Burris HA., 3rd Dual kinase inhibition in the treatment of breast cancer: initial experience with the EGFR/ErbB-2 inhibitor lapatinib. Oncologist. 2004;9(Suppl 3):10–15. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-suppl_3-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Konecny GE, Pegram MD, Venkatesan N, Finn R, Yang G, Rahmeh M, et al. Activity of the dual kinase inhibitor lapatinib (GW572016) against HER-2-overexpressing and trastuzumab-treated breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006 Feb 1;66(3):1630–1639. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Burris HA, 3rd, Hurwitz HI, Dees EC, Dowlati A, Blackwell KL, O'Neil B, et al. Phase I safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity study of lapatinib (GW572016), a reversible dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 10;23(23):5305–5313. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.16.584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gril B, Palmieri D, Bronder JL, Herring JM, Vega-Valle E, Feigenbaum L, et al. Effect of lapatinib on the outgrowth of metastatic breast cancer cells to the brain. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 6;100(15):1092–1103. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lin NU, Dieras V, Paul D, Lossignol D, Christodoulou C, Stemmler HJ, et al. Multicenter phase II study of lapatinib in patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Feb 15;15(4):1452–1459. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, Chan S, Romieu CG, Pienkowski T, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28;355(26):2733–432006. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cameron D, Casey M, Oliva C, Newstat B, Imwalle B, Geyer CE. Lapatinib plus capecitabine in women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: final survival analysis of a phase III randomized trial. Oncologist. 2010;15(9):924–934. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, Franco S, Forster J, Stein S, Rubin S, et al. A phase II study of lapatinib monotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory HER2-positive and HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008 Jun;19(6):1068–1074. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, Rugo H, Sledge G, Koehler M, et al. Randomized study of Lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with ErbB2-positive, trastuzumab-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1124–1130. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, Rugo HS, Sledge G, Aktan G, et al. Overall survival benefit with lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: final results from the EGF104900 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2585–2592. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sendur MA, Aksoy S, Altundag K. Cardiotoxicity of novel HER2-targeted therapies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Aug;29(8):1015–1024. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.807232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Perez EA, Koehler M, Byrne J, Preston AJ, Rappold E, Ewer MS. Cardiac safety of lapatinib: pooled analysis of 3689 patients enrolled in clinical trials. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Jun;83(6):679–686. doi: 10.4065/83.6.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhu S, Cawley SM, Bloch KD, Huang PL. Trastuzumab and lapatinib differ in effects on calcium cycling and HER2 expression in human embryonic stem-cell derived cardiomyocytes. http://www.hoajonline/pdf/2052-4358-1-10.PFD. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Force T, Krause DS, Van Etten RA. Molecular mechanisms of cardiotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibition. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 May;7(5):332–344. doi: 10.1038/nrc2106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Barroso-Sousa R, Santana IA, Testa L, de Melo Gagliato D, Mano MS. Biological therapies in breast cancer: common toxicities and management strategies. Breast. 2013 Dec;22(6):1009–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Agus DB, Gordon MS, Taylor C, Natale RB, Karlan B, Mendelson DS, et al. Phase I clinical study of pertuzumab, a novel HER dimerization inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 10;23(11):2534–2543. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Adams CW, Allison DE, Flagella K, Presta L, Clarke J, Dybdal N, et al. Humanization of a recombinant monoclonal antibody to produce a therapeutic HER dimerization inhibitor, pertuzumab. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006 Jun;55(6):717–727. doi: 10.1007/s00262-005-0058-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Capelan M, Pugliano L, De Azambuja E, Bozovic I, Saini KS, Sotiriou C, et al. Pertuzumab: new hope for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(2):273–282. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Cortes J, Fumoleau P, Bianchi GV, Petrella TM, Gelmon K, Pivot X, et al. Pertuzumab monotherapy after trastuzumab-based treatment and subsequent reintroduction of trastuzumab: activity and tolerability in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 10;30(14):1594–1600. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.4207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gordon MS, Matei D, Aghajanian C, Matulonis UA, Brewer M, Fleming GF, et al. Clinical activity of pertuzumab (rhuMAb 2C4), a HER dimerization inhibitor, in advanced ovarian cancer: potential predictive relationship with tumor HER2 activation status. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 10;24(26):4324–4332. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Scheuer W, Friess T, Burtscher H, Bossenmaier B, Endl J, Hasmann M. Strongly enhanced antitumor activity of trastuzumab and pertuzumab combination treatment on HER2-positive human xenograft tumor models. Cancer Res. 2009;69(24):9330–9336. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Baselga J, Swain SM. CLEOPATRA: A Phase III Evaluation of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clinical breast cancer. 2010;10(6):489–491. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2010.n.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Baselga J, Gelmon KA, Verma S, Wardley A, Conte P, Miles D, et al. Phase II trial of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer that progressed during prior trastuzumab therapy. Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1138–1144. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Baselga J, Cortes J, Kim SB, Im SA, Hegg R, Im YH, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109–119. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113216. The pioneering trial which lead to the FDA approval of pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel, as a standard of care for the first line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.
  • 84.Swain SM, Kim SB, Cortes J, Ro J, Semiglazov V, Campone M, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA study): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):461–471. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70130-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Munoz-Mateu M, Urruticoechea A, Separovic R, Erfan J, Bachelot TD, Canon J, et al. Trastuzumab plus capecitabine with or without pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive MBC whose disease has progressed during or following trastuzumab-based therapy for first-line metastatic disease: A multicenter, randomized, two-arm, phase II study (PHEREXA) ASCO Meeting Abstracts.2011. 2011 Jun 9;29(15_suppl) TPS118. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Perez EA, Lopez-Vega JM, Mastro LD, Petit T, Zamagni C, Freudensprung U, et al. A combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and vinorelbine for first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: An open-label, two-cohort, phase II study(VELVET) 2012 ASCO Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(suppl) abstrTPS653. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.A Study of Trastuzumab-DM1 Plus Pertuzumab Versus Trastuzumab [Herceptin] Plus a Taxane in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MARIANNE); NCT01120184. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 88.Drucker AM, Wu S, Dang CT, Lacouture ME. Risk of rash with the anti-HER2 dimerization antibody pertuzumab: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Sep;135(2):347–354. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2157-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ewer M, Baselga J, Clark E, Benyunes M, Ross G, Swain SM. Cardiac tolerability of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the CLEOPATRA study. ASCO Meeting Abstracts. 2012;30(15_suppl):533. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lenihan D, Suter T, Brammer M, Neate C, Ross G, Baselga J. Pooled analysis of cardiac safety in patients with cancer treated with pertuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2012 Mar;23(3):791–800. 791–800. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Peddi PF, Hurvitz SA. Trastuzumab emtansine: the first targeted chemotherapy for treatment of breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2013 Mar;9(3):319–326. doi: 10.2217/fon.13.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1783–1791. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209124. Results from the pivotal T-DM1 trial, which lead to its FDA approval.
  • 93.Wildiers H, Kim SB, Gonzalez-Martin A, LoRusso PM, Ferrero JM, Smitt M, Yu R, Leung A, Krop IE. T-DM1 for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Primary results from TH3RESA, a phase 3 Study of T-DM1 vs. treatment of physician's choice. Abstract no.15. Presented at: The European Cancer Congress; 27th September–1st October 2013; Amsterdan, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Rabindran SK, Discafani CM, Rosfjord EC, Baxter M, Floyd MB, Golas J, et al. Antitumor activity of HKI-272, an orally active, irreversible inhibitor of the HER-2 tyrosine kinase. Cancer Res. 2004;64(11):3958–3965. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wong KK, Fracasso PM, Bukowski RM, Lynch TJ, Munster PN, Shapiro GI, et al. A phase I study with neratinib (HKI-272), an irreversible pan ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 1;15(7):2552–2558. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Burstein HJ, Sun Y, Dirix LY, Jiang Z, Paridaens R, Tan AR, et al. Neratinib, an irreversible ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced ErbB2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 10;28(8):1301–1307. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Saura C, Martin M, Moroose R, Harb W, Liem K, Arena F, et al. Safety of Neratinib (HKI-272) in Combination with Capacitabine in Patients with Solid Tumors: A Phase I/II Study. Cancer Res; Presented at the Thirty-Second Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; Dec 10–13th 2009; San Antonio,TX. 2009. Dec 15th, [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Temsirolimus Plus Neratinib for Patients With Metastatic HER2-Amplified or Triple Negative Breast Cancer; NCT01111825. Available at: www,clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 99.Study Evaluating The Combination of Neratinib and Capecitabine in Solid Tumors and Breast Cancer; NCT00741260. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 100.Geuna E, Montemurro F, Aglietta M, Valabrega G. Potential of afatinib in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 2012 Aug 27;4:131–137. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S25868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yap TA, Vidal L, Adam J, Stephens P, Spicer J, Shaw H, et al. Phase I trial of the irreversible EGFR and HER2 kinase inhibitor BIBW 2992 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 1;28(25):3965–3972. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.7278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lin NU, Winer EP, Wheatley D, Carey LA, Houston S, Mendelson D, et al. A phase II study of afatinib (BIBW 2992), an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing after trastuzumab. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(3):1057–1065. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2003-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Harbeck N, Im SA, Huang CS, et al. LUX-breast 1: Randomized, phase III trial of afatinib and vinorelbine versus trastuzumab and vinorelbine in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC) failing one prior trastuzumab treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(suppl) doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00540-9. abstr TPS649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Hickish T, Mehta A, Jain M, Huang CS, Kovalenko N, Udovitsa D, et al. LUX-Breast 2: Phase II, open-label study of oral afatinib in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) who progressed on prior trastuzumab and/or lapatinib. Cancer Res. 2012 Dec 15;72(24 Supplement) OT1-1-17. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.LUX-Breast 3: Afatinib Alone or in Combination With Vinorelbine in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Positive Breast Cancer Suffering From Brain Metastases; NCT0112556. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 106.BIBW 2992 and Letrozole in Hormonoresistant Metastatic Breast Cancer; NCT00708214. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov;
  • 107.6 Weeks Treatment of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer With BIBW 2992 (Afatinib) or Lapatinib or Trastuzumab; NCT00826267. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 108.Phase I Open Label Trial to Assess Safety of BIBW 2992 (Afatinib) in Combination With Herceptin® in Patients With HER2-positive Advanced Breast Cancer; NCT00950742. Available at : www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 109.Muller D, Kontermann RE. Bispecific antibodies for cancer immunotherapy: Current perspectives. BioDrugs. 2010 Apr 1;24(2):89–98. doi: 10.2165/11530960-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.McDonagh CF, Huhalov A, Harms BD, Adams S, Paragas V, Oyama S, et al. Antitumor activity of a novel bispecific antibody that targets the ErbB2/ErbB3 oncogenic unit and inhibits heregulin-induced activation of ErbB3. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Mar;11(3):582–593. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kirouac DC, Du JY, Lahdenranta J, Overland R, Yarar D, Paragas V, et al. Computational modeling of ERBB2-amplified breast cancer identifies combined ErbB2/3 blockade as superior to the combination of MEK and AKT inhibitors. Sci Signal. 2013 Aug 13;6(288):ra68. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Higgins MJ, Gabrail NY, Miller K, Agresta SV, Sharma S, McDonagh C, et al. A phase I/II study of MM-111, a novel bispecific antibody that targets the ErB2/ErB3 heterodimer, in combination with trastuzumab in advanced refractory HER2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(suppl) abstr TPS119. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lauring J, Park BH, Wolff AC. The phosphoinositide-3-kinase-Akt-mTOR pathway as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Jun 1;11(6):670–678. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Baselga J. Targeting the phosphoinositide-3 (PI3) kinase pathway in breast cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(Suppl 1):12–19. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-S1-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Study of XL147 (SAR245408) in Combination With Trastuzumab or Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab in Subjects With Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Progressed on a Previous Trastuzumab-based Regimen; NCT01042925. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 116.Safety and Efficacy of BKM120 in Combination With Trastuzumab in Patients With Relapsing HER2 Overexpressing Breast Cancer Who Have Previously Failed Trastuzumab; NCT01042925. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 117.Hurvitz SA, Andre F, Burris HA, Toi M, Buyse ME, Sahmoud T, et al. BOLERO-1: A randomized, phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of everolimus in combination with trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in women with HER2-positive (HER2+), locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC) J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(suppl) abstr TPS648. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.O'Regan R, Ozguroglu M, Andre F, Toi M, Jerusalem GHM, Wilks S, et al. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-comtrolled multicenter trial of daily everolimus plus weekly trastuzumab and vinorelbine in trastuzumab-resistant, advanced breast cancer (BOLERO-3) J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(suppl) abstr 505. [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lu X, Xiao L, Wang L, Ruden DM. Hsp90 inhibitors and drug resistance in cancer: the potential benefits of combination therapies of Hsp90 inhibitors and other anti-cancer drugs. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012 Apr 15;83(8):995–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Jhaveri K, Taldone T, Modi S, Chiosis G. Advances in the clinical development of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitors in cancers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Mar;1823(3):742–755. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Modi S, Stopeck AT, Gordon MS, Mendelson D, Solit DB, Bagatell R, et al. Combination of trastuzumab and tanespimycin (17-AAG, KOS-953) is safe and active in trastuzumab-refractory HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer: a phase I dose-escalation study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 1;25(34):5410–5417. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Jhaveri K, Miller K, Rosen L, Schneider B, Chap L, Hannah A, et al. A phase I dose-escalation trial of trastuzumab and alvespimycin hydrochloride (KOS-1022; 17 DMAG) in the treatment of advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Sep 15;18(18):5090–5098. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Modi S, Saura C, Henderson C, Lin NU, Mahtani R, Goddard J, et al. A multicenter trial evaluating retaspimycin HCL (IPI-504) plus trastuzumab in patients with advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 May;139(1):107–113. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2510-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.An Open-Label Multicenter Phase 2 Window of Opportunity Study Evaluating Ganetespib in Women With Breast Cancer (Enchant); NCT01677455. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 125.Modi S, Ismail-Khan R, Munster P, Lucas M, Galluppi GR, Tangri S, et al. Phase 1 dose escalation study of the heat shock protein 90 inhibitor BIIB021 with trastuzumab in HER2 metastatic breast cancer. Proceedings of the 33rd annual San Antonio breast cancer symposium; 2010 Dec 8–12; San Antonio, TX. [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Combination of AUY922 With Trastuzumab in HER2+ Advanced Breast Cancer in Patients Previously Treated With Trastuzumab; NCT01271920. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
  • 127.Pegram MD, Reese DM. Combined biological therapy of breast cancer using monoclonal antibodies directed against HER2/neu protein and vascular endothelial growth factor. Semin Oncol. 2002 Jun;29(3) Suppl 11:29–37. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.34053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Falchook GS, Moulder SL, Wheler JJ, Jiang Y, Bastida CC, Kurzrock R. Dual HER2 inhibition in combination with anti-VEGF treatment is active in heavily pretreated HER2-positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24(12):3004–3011. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Martin M, Makhson A, Gligorov J, Lichinitser M, Lluch A, Semiglazov V, et al. Phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine as first-line treatment for HER2-positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17(4):469–475. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Gianni L, Romieu GH, Lichinitser M, Serrano SV, Mansutti M, Pivot X, et al. AVEREL: a randomized phase III Trial evaluating bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel and trastuzumab as first-line therapy for HER2-positive locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1719–1725. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.7912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Slamon DJ, Swain SM, Buyse M, Martin M, Geyer CE, Im Y-H, et al. Primary results from BETH, a phase III controlled study of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab+/− bevacizumab in patients with HER2-positive, node-positive, node-positive or high risk node-negative breast cancer. Presented at 36th CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Conference; Dec 9–14th 2013; San Antonio, TX. [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Milani A, Sangiolo D, Montemurro F, Aglietta M, Valabrega G. Active immunotherapy in HER2 overexpressing breast cancer: current status and future perspectives. Ann Oncol. 2013 Jul;24(7):1740–1748. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Disis M, Dang Y, Bates N, Higgins D, Childs J, Slota M, et al. Phase II study of a HER2/neu (HER2) intracellular domain (ICD) vaccine given concurrently with trastuzumab in patients with newly diagnosed advanced stage breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;69(24_suppl):5102. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Peoples GE, Holmes JP, Hueman MT, Mittendorf EA, Amin A, Khoo S, et al. Combined clinical trial results of a HER2/neu (E75) vaccine for the prevention of recurrence in high-risk breast cancer patients: U.S. Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group Study I-01 and I-02. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Feb 1;14(3):797–803. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Benavides LC, Gates JD, Carmichael MG, Patil R, Holmes JP, Hueman MT, et al. The impact of HER2/neu expression level on response to the E75 vaccine: from U.S. Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group Study I-01 and I-02. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 15;15(8):2895–2904. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Emens LA, Gupta R, Petrik S, Laiko M, Leatherman JM, Levi J, et al. A feasibility study of combination therapy with trastuzumab (T), cyclophosphamide (CY), and an allogeneic GM-CSF-secreting breast tumor vaccine for the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol; Presented at: 2011 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; 2011. abstr 2535. [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Norell H, Poschke I, Charo J, Wei WZ, Erskine C, Piechocki MP, et al. Vaccination with a plasmid DNA encoding HER-2/neu together with low doses of GM-CSF and IL-2 in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: a pilot clinical trial. J Transl Med. 2010;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-8-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Cizkova M, Dujaric ME, Lehmann-Che J, Scott V, Tembo O, Asselain B, et al. Outcome impact of PIK3CA mutations in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab. Br J Cancer. 2013 May 14;108(9):1807–1809. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Baselga J, Cortes J, Im S-A, Clark E, Kiermaier A, Ross G, et al. Biomarker analysis in CLEOPATRA: A phase III, placebo controlled study of pertuzumab in HER2-positive, first line metastatic breast cancer (oral presentation). Cancer Research; Proceedings of the 35th San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 4–8th 2012; San Antonio, Texas. 2012. Dec 15, Biomarker analysis from the pivotal CLEOPATRA trial.
  • 140.Loibl S, Denkert C, Schneeweis A, Paepke S, Lehmann A, Rezai M, et al. PIK3CA mutation predicts resistance to anti-HER2/chemotherapy in primary HER2-positive/hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer – Prospective analysis of 737 participants of the GeparSixto and GeparQuinto studies. Presented at the 36th CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 9–14th 2013; San Antonio, TX. [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Baselga J, Verma S, Ro J, Huober J, Guardino E, Fang L, et al. Abstract LB-63: Relationship between tumor biomarkers (BM) and efficacy in EMILIA, a phase III study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) Cancer Res. 2013 Apr 15;73(8 Supplement) doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2499. LB-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Lin NU. Brain metastases in HER2-positive breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):185–186. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Bria E, Cuppone F, Fornier M, Nistico C, Carlini P, Milella M, et al. Cardiotoxicity and incidence of brain metastases after adjuvant trastuzumab for early breast cancer: the dark side of the moon? A meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 May;109(2):231–239. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9663-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Bachelot T, Romieu G, Campone M, Dieras V, Cropet C, Dalenc F, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (LANDSCAPE): a single-group phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jan;14(1):64–71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70432-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Kunisue H, Kurebayashi J, Otsuki T, Tang CK, Kurosumi M, Yamamoto S, et al. Anti-HER2 antibody enhances the growth inhibitory effect of anti-oestrogen on breast cancer cells expressing both oestrogen receptors and HER2. Br J Cancer. 2000 Jan;82(1):46–51. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Kaufman B, Mackey JR, Clemens MR, Bapsy PP, Vaid A, Wardley A, et al. Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III TAnDEM study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5529–5537. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Johnston S, Pippen J, Jr, Pivot X, Lichinitser M, Sadeghi S, Dieras V, et al. Lapatinib combined with letrozole versus letrozole and placebo as first-line therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5538–5546. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Ramakrishna N, Temin S, Chandarlapaty S, Crews JR, Davidson NE, Esteva FJ, et al. Recommendations on Disease Management for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 5; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0955. [Epub ahead of print]. Recently published guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC.

RESOURCES