Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Oct 2;9(10):e102286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102286

Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Related Pathways Tested on an Endometrial Ex-Vivo Model

Mona Rahmati 1,2,*, Marie Petitbarat 1, Sylvie Dubanchet 1, Armand Bensussan 1, Gerard Chaouat 1, Nathalie Ledee 1,2
Editor: Ana Claudia Zenclussen3
PMCID: PMC4183482  PMID: 25275446

Abstract

Introduction

Recombinant human Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (rhG-CSF) supplementation seems to be a promising innovative therapy in reproductive medicine, used in case of recurrent miscarriage, embryo implantation failure or thin endometrium, although its mechanisms of action remain unknown. Our aim was to identify possible endometrial pathways influenced by rhG-CSF.

Materials and Methods

Hypothetical molecular interactions regulated by G-CSF were designed through a previous large scale endometrial microarray study. The variation of endometrial expression of selected target genes was confirmed in control and infertile patients. G-CSF supplementation influence on these targets was tested on an endometrial ex-vivo culture. Middle luteal phase endometrial biopsies were cultured on collagen sponge with or without rhG-CSF supplementation during 3 consecutive days. Variations of endometrial mRNA expression for the selected targets were studied by RT-PCR.

Results

At the highest dose of rhG-CSF stimulation, the mRNA expression of these selected target genes was significantly increased if compared with their expression without addition of rhG-CSF. The selected targets were G-CSF Receptor (G-CSFR), Integrin alpha-V/beta-3 (ITGB3) implicated in cell migration and embryo implantation, Plasminogen Activator Urokinase Receptor (PLAUR) described as interacting with integrins and implicated in cell migration, Thymidine Phosphorylase (TYMP) implicated in local angiogenesis, CD40 and its ligand CD40L involved in cell proliferation control.

Conclusion

RhG-CSF seems able to influence endometrial expressions crucial for implantation process involving endometrial vascular remodelling, local immune modulation and cellular adhesion pathways. These variations observed in an ex-vivo model should be tested in-vivo. The strict indications or counter indication of rhG-CSF supplementation in reproductive field are not yet established, while the safety of its administration in early pregnancy on early embryogenesis still needs to be demonstrated. Nevertheless, rhG-CSF appears as a promising therapy in some difficult and unsolved cases of reproductive failure. Indications of pre-conceptual rhG-CSF supplementation may derive from a diagnosed lack of endometrial expression of some target genes.

Introduction

Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (rhG-CSF) is used since late 1980's in haematological indications such as chemotherapy induced neutropenia [1], congenital agranulocytosis [2] or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation [3].

In reproductive medicine, rhG-CSF supplementation seems to be one of the most promising innovative therapies. Indeed, in distinct countries, rhG-CSF supplementation, either systemic (subcutaneous administration) or local (intra uterine infusion), is evaluated in the context of some unexplained recurrent miscarriages, repeated embryo implantation failures or thin unresponsive endometrium. Two randomised studies using rhG-CSF supplementation on IVF stimulation protocols, in case of repeated miscarriages, suggest a higher live birth rate and fewer cases of pregnancy loss [4] [5]. Moreover, rhG-CSF supplementation is tested in preliminary IVF protocols involving patients with a history of repeated embryo implantation failures (IF) [6]. There are also cases of pregnancy reported after intra-uterine infusion of rhG-CSF, in patients with IVF failure with endometrial trophic defect [7] [8] [9] [10].

However, the mechanisms of action by which rhG-CSF would positively influence the embryo implantation are largely unknown. The objective of the present study was to identify the possible relevant pathways influenced by a local administration of rhG-CSF, involving target genes pre-selected from a previous large scale microarray [11], using an ex-vivo model of endometrial microhistoculture [12]. In this model and considering the selected target genes, rhG-CSF seems able to influence some endometrial expressions crucial for the implantation process. These molecules whose expression seems to be under G-CSF influence are involved in the endometrial vascular remodelling, the local immune modulation and cellular adhesion systems.

Materials and Methods

Patients

81 women were enrolled for this study. All patients were involved in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) programs and were less than 38 years of age. There was no statistically significant difference in age and BMI between the different groups. All patients were non-smoker. They all provided a written informed consent and this investigation was approved by our Institutional Review Board, Agence de la Biomedecine, under the trial registration number 2013-A00072-43.

17 patients were fertile control women, involved in ART because of male infertility. All had delivered after either intra-uterine insemination or ICSI within the two first attempts. They were evaluated at least six months after their delivery and before a new attempt. The mean age in this group was 33 years (from 29 to 35 years old). The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 23.8 (from 21 to 27.9).

19 patients had repeated unexplained embryo implantation failure (IF) [13] defined as an absence of pregnancy despite the transfer of 10 or more good quality embryos (fresh or frozen-thawed) over several cycles. All embryos had a fragmentation rate of less than 20% and were at least at the 4-cell stage by day 2 after IVF. The inclusion criteria also included a normal uterine morphology (excluding fibroma, polyps, thin endometrium, synechia, uterine malformation) after ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy, a normal karyotype, a normal hormonal reserve (FSH<10 mIU/ml, antral follicle count >9 follicles) and normal responses to the hormonal stimulation (with more than 8 oocytes retrieved per cycle). Normal endometrial trophicity was defined after ultrasonography by an endometrial thickness over 7 mm and an endometrial volume over 2.5 cm3 during luteal phase. In this group, the mean age was 31.7 years (from 28 to 35) and the mean BMI was 22.6 (from 19 to 29).

15 patients had a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriages (RM) [14] defined by at least three subsequent pregnancy losses between 6 to 12 weeks of gestation, remaining unexplained after uterine morphology evaluation (ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy), standard auto-immune exploration (antiphospholipid antibodies as lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies), evaluation of the thrombophilic activity (protein S, protein C, factor V, factor VIII) and exploration of genetic markers (parental karyotype). The mean age in RM group was 31 years (from 25 to 36) and the mean BMI was 20.6 (from 18 to 25).

30 other patients participated to our study. They were involved in a pre IVF cycle endometrial biopsy program (pre IVF “endometrial scratching” protocol). These endometrial biopsies were used for ex-vivo microhistocultures.

Endometrial biopsies

Endometrial biopsies were programmed during a monitored natural cycle, 7 to 9 days after the ovulation surge (LH surge), during the hypothetical implantation window. These biopsies were performed with a standard Cornier pipelle (CCD Laboratories, Paris, France), collecting material from superficial endometrial layers in order to minimise sampling variations.

One part of the endometrial sample was formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded for later histological study. We used a standard haematoxylin and eosin staining protocol on 3 µm thick sections for routine histological evaluation. Moreover, a histological endometrial dating, to classify patients as “in phase” or “out phase”, was performed according to the Noyes criteria [15].

Another part was collected in RPMI 1640 Glutamax medium for endometrial ex-vivo culture.

A third and last part of the endometrial sample was transferred into an RNA stabilizer solution (RNA Later, Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) for further RNA extraction.

Endometrial microhistoculture

The endometrial microhistoculture model used in this study has been previously described by our team [12]. In this ex-vivo model, the cellular functionality and differentiation are preserved for five days. As a brief reminder, endometrial samples (1 to 2 mm3) were taken from biopsies collected in RPMI 1640 Glutamax medium, during the 2 or 3 first hours after collection. We put these endometrial blocks on collagen sponge gels (GelfoamH, Pharmacia Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) which are placed into supplemented RPMI 1640 Glutamax culture medium. The medium supplementation was as follows: 15% heat-inactivated foetal calf serum, 1% penicillin and 1% streptomycin, non-essential amino acids, 1% sodium pyruvate (all from Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, France), 50 nmol/l of estradiol and progesterone (Sigma, St Quentin-Fallavier, France). Estradiol and progesterone supplementations were repeated daily. The cultures were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humid atmosphere.

For rhG-CSF stimulation, the five culture conditions were: rhG-CSF at either 20, 100 or 200 ng/ml, or G-CSF blocking antibody (anti G-CSF) at 3 µg/ml (all recombinant proteins and antibodies from R&D Systems, Lille, France). Recombinant protein or antibody was added to the culture medium every day during three consecutive days. After a three days incubation, the endometrial samples were collected in a RNA stabilizer solution (RNA Later, QIAGEN, Courtaboueuf, France) for RNA extraction and RT-qPCR, as described in the corresponding paragraph.

To specifically target the rhG-CSF endometrial action, the same experiments were performed with Granulocyte-Macrophage-CSF (rhGM-CSF) at either 20, 100 or 200 ng/ml, or GM-CSF blocking antibody (anti GM-CSF) at 3 µg/ml (recombinant proteins and antibodies from R&D Systems, Lille, France).

The biopsies from 30 patients, involved in a pre IVF cycle endometrial biopsy program, were used for these ex-vivo microhistocultures. Biopsies from 17 patients provided 57 endometrial samples (1 to 2 mm3) for rhG-CSF microhistocultures. Biopsies from 13 patients provided 39 samples (1 to 2 mm3) for control rhGM-CSF microhistocultures.

Every patient was her own control, e.g. for each stimulation condition, an endometrial sample from the same patient was concomitantly placed in identical culture conditions, without the corresponding recombinant protein or blocking antibody. For these control cultures, only estradiol and progesterone were daily added (EP condition), as described, during the three days incubation period. Therefore, for the same endometrium, we could compare the target gene expressions under specific stimulation and EP condition.

Endometrial RNA extraction, quality control and cDNA synthesis

The total endometrial sample was homogenized with an Ultra Turrax T15 (IKA-WERKE) and the homogenate was then purified on Qiashredder columns (Qiagen, Coutaboeuf, France). The total RNA was isolated with the Qiagen RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Courtabeuf, France) including the RNase-free DNAse set. Recombinant RNase inhibitor (10 units/µl of extracted RNA) was added to prevent RNA degradation. RNA quantity and quality were confirmed by the analysis with an Experion system and RNA Std Sens analysis kit (Bio-rad, Marnes la Coquette, France). The RNA was then stored at −80°C. The RNA (1 µg) was first reverse-transcribed into cDNA using random primers and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Target genes selection and real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Hypothetical pathways and molecular interactions putatively regulated by G-CSF were selected on the basis of gene expression deregulations according to the indications stemming from a previous large scale endometrial microarray study [11]. Briefly, this microarray analysis suggested pre conceptual extensive endometrial deregulations in patients with IF or RM. When analysing those intricate pathways involving G-CSF, the expression of some gene seemed strikingly specifically deregulated. Selecting among these highly deregulated genes, those hypothetically depending on G-CSF action, we picked up those molecules involved in immune regulation, coagulation system or integrins. We therefore selected the following genes, suggested as G-CSF targets in the endometrium: G-CSF Receptor (G-CSFR), Integrin alpha-V/beta-3 (ITGB3) known to be implicated in cell migration and embryo implantation, Plasminogen Activator Urokinase Receptor (PLAUR) described as interacting with integrins and implicated in cell migration, Thymidine Phosphorylase (TYMP) implicated in local angiogenesis, CD40 and CD40 Ligand (CD40L) involved in cell proliferation control.

Specific primers for these targets genes and Ribosomal Protein L13A (RPL13A), as the reference gene, were constructed using the Universal Probe Library Assay Design Center (\.rocheapplied-science.com) and their sequences were searched against Gen-Bank sequences with the BLAST program to ensure the specificity of primers. Real-time PCR was carried out using a LightCycler 480 apparatus (Roche, Meylan, France). Reactions were set up using the following final concentrations: 0.5 mM of sense and antisens primers, 1X 480 SYBER Green master mix and 4 ml of 1/20 diluted cDNA. Cycling conditions were as follows: denaturation (95°C for 5 min), amplification and quantitation (95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 10 s and 72°C for 15 s) repeated 40 times, a melting curve program (65–95°C with a ramp rate of 2.2°C/s) and a cooling step to 4°C. In addition to the no-reverse transcription and no-template controls, an independently inter run calibrator (IRC) was included in each RT-PCR assay. This IRC was obtained from blast-cells. In each assay, an aliquot of the IRC cDNA was 20 times diluted and was submitted to the qPCR protocol as the unknown samples. PCR efficiencies for each quantified target and reference were calculated using known serial dilutions of each specific cDNA. Data were analysed using the LightCyclerH480 Software release 1.5.0. Each specific target transcription level was normalized to the geometric mean of the transcription levels of the reference gene, using the Advanced Relative Quantification of the LightCyclerH480 Software. Efficiency was controlled for each specific gene amplification.

For each sample, the results are expressed in concentration ratio (target gene mRNA level/reference gene mRNA level). For microhistoculture samples, these ratios are compared between the stimulated culture condition and the EP basal condition, as described in the dedicated paragraph, each patient being her own control.

Statistics

The Wilcoxon test was used to compare target genes mRNA expressions in each patient group and in each culture condition. The Spearman test was used to search for a correlation between different gene expressions. The statistical assessments were performed using the Stat View software (Abacus Concepts, CA, USA). The significance level was set up at p<0. 05.

Results, Discussion, and Conclusions

Results and discussion

Both the protein production and mRNA expression of G-CSF receptor (G-CSFR) have been shown to be localised at the maternal foetal interface since the late 1980's [16], with cyclic and gestational regulations [17] [18] and a trophoblast growth promoting role [19]. When considering the G-CSFR mRNA expression in control vs. infertile patients, we did not notice any significant global difference. But when considering the IF subgroup within the infertile patients, the G-CSFR mRNA expression was significantly lower (p = 0.01), as shown in figure 1a. In the ex vivo model, we observed a significantly higher mRNA expression at the highest dose of rhG-CSF stimulation (p = 0.01). We did not find any significant mRNA variation with the adjunction of anti G-CSF (figure 2a).

Figure 1. Endometrial mRNA expressions variation in control, IF and RM patients.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Figure 1a: G-CSFR mRNA expression variation in control, IF and RM patients. Figure 1b: TYMP mRNA expression variation in control, IF and RM patients. Figure 1c: ITGB3 and PLAUR mRNA expressions variation in control, IF and RM patients. Figure 1d: CD40 mRNA expression variation in control, IF and RM patients. IF: Implantation Failures. RM: Repeated Miscarriages. Results expressed in concentration ratio (Arbitrary Units) between target gene mRNA level and reference gene mRNA level. (*) Statistically Significant Difference, p<0.05.

Figure 2. Endometrial mRNA expressions variation after rhG-CSF stimulation.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Figure 2a: G-CSFR mRNA expression variation after rhG-CSF stimulation. Figure 2b: TYMP mRNA expression variation after G-CSF stimulation. Figure 2c: ITGB3 mRNA expression variation after G-CSF stimulation. Figure 2d: PLAUR mRNA expression variation after G-CSF stimulation. Anti G-CSF: 3 days culture with G-CSF blocking antibody daily supplementation at 3 µg/ml. G-CSF (1): 3 days culture with rhG-CSF daily supplementation at 20 ng/ml. G-CSF (2): 3 days culture with rhG-CSF daily supplementation at 100 ng/ml. G-CSF (3): 3 days culture with rhG-CSF daily supplementation at 200 ng/ml. Results expressed in concentration ratio (Arbitrary Units) between target gene mRNA level after culture with and without specific stimulation, each patient being her own control. (*) Statistically Significant Difference, p<0.05.

Thymidine Phosphorylase (TYMP), also known as the platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF) or gliostatin, is a key angiogenesis promoting enzyme [20] as well as a cell migration promoter, especially by modulating integrin expression [21]. Its presence is also described in the endometrium [22]. In our infertile group, the TYMP endometrial mRNA expression was significantly lower (p = 0.0019), in those patients with either IF or RM (figure 1b). When the cultures were stimulated with the highest dose of rhG-CSF ex vivo, the TYMP endometrial mRNA expression appeared significantly higher (p = 0.04), as illustrated in figure 2b. G-CSF blocking antibody had no significant action on TYMP expression.

Integrin alpha-V/beta-3 (ITGB3), which is present in the endometrium [23], is described as being highly implicated in the cell migration and embryo implantation process [24]. It is a major endometrial adhesion molecule described as such not only in Human, but also in various animal models such as bovine [25] [26], porcine [27] [28] and ovine [29]. An ITGB3's down regulation has also been incriminated in pathological situations involving an impaired endometrial receptivity [30]. As an expected G-CSF endometrial target, ITGB3 mRNA expression was significantly enhanced (p = 0.001) by application, of the highest dose of rhG-CSF ex vivo (figure 2c), and without any change despite anti G-CSF adjunction. However, in this study, we could not obtain a significant difference in ITGB3 endometrial mRNA expression between control and infertile patients, either with IF or RM. We thus tried to consider the possible interaction of ITGB3 with PLAUR.

Plasminogen Activator Urokinase Receptor (PLAUR), or uPAR (Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor), is an essential actor in tissue remodelling through cell migration, proliferation and survival [31]. PLAUR is localised in the endometrium, its expression varying during the menstrual cycle [32]. It is described in early placental bed pregnancies and especially in those immune endometrial cells called uterine Natural Killers [33]. PLAUR is often implicated in impaired trophoblastic invasion, leading to pathological pregnancies with intra uterine growth retardation or pre eclampsia [34] [35] [36] [37]. Moreover, the PLAUR signalling pathway is described as requiring integrins, including ITGB3 [31]. Therefore, since we could not find any significant difference in endometrial PLAUR mRNA expression between control and infertile patients, we studied endometrial PLAUR and ITGB3 interaction by considering the following ratio: ITGB3 mRNA level/PLAUR mRNA level. When considering the ITGB3/PLAUR mRNA expressions (figure 1c), we observed a significant endometrial disequilibrium in these infertile patients with a history of RM (p = 0.02). When stimulated with the highest dose of rhG-CSF, PLAUR endometrial mRNA expression was significantly enhanced (p = 0.04), as illustrated in figure 2d. Again, these variations were not observed when adding anti G-CSF.

CD40 and its ligand CD40L are membrane molecules involved in the control of cellular proliferation via regulation of apoptotic mechanisms [38]. They are localised on immune cells, haematopoietic progenitors, epithelial cells and carcinomas [39]. When considering our previous microarray study, these genes seemed highly deregulated in the endometrium of infertile patients, and hypothetically interacting with G-CSF. In this study, CD40 endometrial mRNA expression did not significantly vary between control and infertile patients, when taken globally. But when considering the IF subgroup within the infertile patients, the CD40 mRNA expression was significantly lower compared to control group (p = 0.04), as shown in figure 1d. In the ex-vivo model, at the highest dose of rhG-CSF stimulation, CD40 mRNA expression only tend to be higher, without reaching significance (data not shown). CD40L mRNA expression level was very low in either control or infertile patients and did not vary in the ex-vivo culture with rhG-CSF supplementation. For both genes, we did not observe any significant mRNA variation with anti G-CSF adjunction.

The mRNA expression variations for G-CSFR, TYMP, ITGB3 and PLAUR, observed under rhG-CSF stimulation, were found to be correlated, as shown in table 1, suggesting that the described pathways may be intricated.

Table 1. Correlation between target genes mRNA expression under G-CSF stimulation.

Correlation between Target Genes Expression Rho p
ITGB3 & TYMP 31% 0,05
PLAUR & ITGB3 47% 0,003
PLAUR & TYMP 45% 0,005
GCSFR & ITGB3 67% <0,0001
GCSFR & TYMP 46% 0,006
GCSFR & PLAUR 37% 0,02
Open in a new tab

To specifically study the action of endometrial rhG-CSF on its selected target genes, we used the same ex-vivo experiments with rhGM-CSF supplementation during 3 consecutive days. This control supplementation did not induce any variation on mRNA expressions of G-CSFR, TYMP, ITGB3 or PLAUR, as observed with rhG-CSF adjunction.

In all cases, adjunction of either anti G-CSF blocking antibody or anti GM-CSF blocking antibody did not show any variation in the target genes expression with the present ex vivo model. This may be due to existing redundant pathways or linked to the type of selected blocking antibody.

Conclusions

After showing the difference of expression of some hypothetical endometrial targets in infertile patients, and after observing the variations of expression of these target genes under specific rhG-CSF stimulation ex vivo, this study illustrates the putative key role of G-CSF during the embryo implantation process. This cytokine seems able to modulate fundamental genes intervening in the local embryo adhesion, cell migration, tissue remodelling and angiogenesis, unavoidable for a successful implantation and further placentation.

RhG-CSF appears actually as a promising innovative therapy in some difficult and unsolved cases of reproductive failure. However, strict indications of this supplementation in reproductive field are not established yet. Such expected endometrial actions may be tested after in vivo rhG-CSF supplementation and safety of such treatment still needs to be demonstrated on early stages of embryogenesis. Specific indications of pre conceptual rhG-CSF supplementation may also derive from diagnosed lack of endometrial expression of some of its target genes.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the patients without whom this study would not have been possible. We also thank all the involved physicians from ART Department in Pierre Rouques - Les Bluets Hospital.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work is supported by Grant for Fertility Innovation, 2010, Merck Serono, http://www.grantforfertilityinnovation.com/en/gfi2010/winners/dr_nathalie_ledee.html. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Morstyn G, Campbell L, Souza LM, Alton NK, Keech J, et al. (1988) Effect of granulocyte colony stimulating factor on neutropenia induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Lancet 1: 667–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bonilla MA, Gillio AP, Ruggeiro M, Kernan NA, Brochstein JA, et al. (1989) Effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on neutropenia in patients with congenital agranulocytosis. N Engl J Med 320: 1574–1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gianni AM, Siena S, Bregni M, Tarella C, Stern AC, et al. (1989) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to harvest circulating haemopoietic stem cells for autotransplantation. Lancet 2: 580–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Scarpellini F, Sbracia M (2009) Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod 24: 2703–2708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Santjohanser C, Knieper C, Franz C, Hirv K, Meri O, et al. (2013) Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as treatment option in patients with recurrent miscarriage. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 61: 159–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wurfel W, Santjohanser C, Hirv K, Buhl M, Meri O, et al.. (2010) High pregnancy rates with administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ART-patients with repetitive implantation failure and lacking killer-cell immunglobulin-like receptors. Hum Reprod 25: 2151–2152; author reply 2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Gleicher N, Vidali A, Barad DH (2011) Successful treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium. Fertil Steril 95: 2123 e2113–2127. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8. Gleicher N, Kim A, Michaeli T, Lee HJ, Shohat-Tal A, et al. (2013) A pilot cohort study of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium resistant to standard therapies. Hum Reprod 28: 172–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Barad DH, Yu Y, Kushnir VA, Shohat-Tal A, Lazzaroni E, et al. (2014) A randomized clinical trial of endometrial perfusion with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in in vitro fertilization cycles: impact on endometrial thickness and clinical pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 101: 710–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kunicki M, Lukaszuk K, Woclawek-Potocka I, Liss J, Kulwikowska P, et al. (2014) Evaluation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor effects on treatment-resistant thin endometrium in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Biomed Res Int 2014: 913235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ledee N, Munaut C, Aubert J, Serazin V, Rahmati M, et al. (2011) Specific and extensive endometrial deregulation is present before conception in IVF/ICSI repeated implantation failures (IF) or recurrent miscarriages. J Pathol 225: 554–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Petitbarat M, Rahmati M, Serazin V, Dubanchet S, Morvan C, et al. (2011) TWEAK Appears as a Modulator of Endometrial IL-18 Related Cytotoxic Activity of Uterine Natural Killers. PLoS One 6: e14497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Polanski LT, Baumgarten MN, Quenby S, Brosens J, Campbell BK, et al. (2014) What exactly do we mean by ‘recurrent implantation failure’? A systematic review and opinion. Reprod Biomed Online 28: 409–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Larsen EC, Christiansen OB, Kolte AM, Macklon N (2013) New insights into mechanisms behind miscarriage. BMC Med 11: 154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J (1975) Dating the endometrial biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122: 262–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Uzumaki H, Okabe T, Sasaki N, Hagiwara K, Takaku F, et al. (1989) Identification and characterization of receptors for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on human placenta and trophoblastic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 9323–9326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. McCracken S, Layton JE, Shorter SC, Starkey PM, Barlow DH, et al. (1996) Expression of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and its receptor is regulated during the development of the human placenta. J Endocrinol 149: 249–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. McCracken SA, Grant KE, MacKenzie IZ, Redman CW, Mardon HJ (1999) Gestational regulation of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor expression in the human placenta. Biol Reprod 60: 790–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Miyama M, Umesaki N, Kawabata M (1998) Identification of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) producing cell population in human decidua and its biological action on trophoblast cell. Osaka City Med J 44: 85–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Deves C, Rostirolla DC, Martinelli LK, Bizarro CV, Santos DS, et al. (2014) The kinetic mechanism of Human Thymidine Phosphorylase - a molecular target for cancer drug development. Mol Biosyst 10: 592–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Pula G, Garonna E, Dunn WB, Hirano M, Pizzorno G, et al. (2010) Paracrine stimulation of endothelial cell motility and angiogenesis by platelet-derived deoxyribose-1-phosphate. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30: 2631–2638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Laudanski P, Charkiewicz R, Kuzmicki M, Szamatowicz J, Swiatecka J, et al. (2014) Profiling of selected angiogenesis-related genes in proliferative eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 172: 85–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Singh H, Aplin JD (2009) Adhesion molecules in endometrial epithelium: tissue integrity and embryo implantation. J Anat 215: 3–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zhao Y, Garcia J, Kolp L, Cheadle C, Rodriguez A, et al. (2010) The impact of luteal phase support on gene expression of extracellular matrix protein and adhesion molecules in the human endometrium during the window of implantation following controlled ovarian stimulation with a GnRH antagonist protocol. Fertil Steril 94: 2264–2271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sakurai T, Bai H, Bai R, Arai M, Iwazawa M, et al. (2012) Coculture system that mimics in vivo attachment processes in bovine trophoblast cells. Biol Reprod 87: 60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Yamakoshi S, Bai R, Chaen T, Ideta A, Aoyagi Y, et al. (2012) Expression of mesenchymal-related genes by the bovine trophectoderm following conceptus attachment to the endometrial epithelium. Reproduction 143: 377–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Massuto DA, Kneese EC, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Hooper RN, et al. (2010) Transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) signaling is activated during porcine implantation: proposed role for latency-associated peptide interactions with integrins at the conceptus-maternal interface. Reproduction 139: 465–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Su L, Liu R, Cheng W, Zhu M, Li X, et al. (2014) Expression Patterns of MicroRNAs in Porcine Endometrium and Their Potential Roles in Embryo Implantation and Placentation. PLoS One 9: e87867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Burghardt RC, Burghardt JR, Taylor JD 2nd, Reeder AT, Nguen BT, et al. (2009) Enhanced focal adhesion assembly reflects increased mechanosensation and mechanotransduction at maternal-conceptus interface and uterine wall during ovine pregnancy. Reproduction 137: 567–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zhu LH, Sun LH, Hu YL, Jiang Y, Liu HY, et al. (2013) PCAF impairs endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation by down-regulating beta3-integrin expression via HOXA10 acetylation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: 4417–4428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Smith HW, Marshall CJ (2010) Regulation of cell signalling by uPAR. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 23–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Nordengren J, Pilka R, Noskova V, Ehinger A, Domanski H, et al. (2004) Differential localization and expression of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR), and its inhibitor (PAI-1) mRNA and protein in endometrial tissue during the menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod 10: 655–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Naruse K, Lash GE, Bulmer JN, Innes BA, Otun HA, et al. (2009) The urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) system in uterine natural killer cells in the placental bed during early pregnancy. Placenta 30: 398–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lala PK, Chakraborty C (2003) Factors regulating trophoblast migration and invasiveness: possible derangements contributing to pre-eclampsia and fetal injury. Placenta 24: 575–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Renaud SJ, Macdonald-Goodfellow SK, Graham CH (2007) Coordinated regulation of human trophoblast invasiveness by macrophages and interleukin 10. Biol Reprod 76: 448–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Goddard KA, Tromp G, Romero R, Olson JM, Lu Q, et al. (2007) Candidate-gene association study of mothers with pre-eclampsia, and their infants, analyzing 775 SNPs in 190 genes. Hum Hered 63: 1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Uszynski M, Uszynski W (2011) Coagulation and fibrinolysis in amniotic fluid: physiology and observations on amniotic fluid embolism, preterm fetal membrane rupture, and pre-eclampsia. Semin Thromb Hemost 37: 165–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Smith KA (2014) Toward a Molecular Understanding of Adaptive Immunity: A Chronology, Part III. Front Immunol 5: 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Hassan SB, Sorensen JF, Olsen BN, Pedersen AE (2014) Anti-CD40-mediated cancer immunotherapy: an update of recent and ongoing clinical trials. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 36: 96–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES