Abstract
Aim:
The aim is to determine the pattern of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) seen in two tertiary hospitals in Benghazi, Libya.
Materials and methods:
The cohort includes all patients of CRC who were presented between January 2007 and December 2009 to the Oncology Department, Aljomhoria Hospital and 7th October Hospital, Benghazi. Patient's age, gender, clinical presentation, location of cancer involvement, and histopathologic diagnosis were reviewed. Tumor staging was carried out according to Astler Coller modification of Duke's system, dividing it into stage A to C depending upon the extent of local involvement and regional node spread. Stage D was added to account for distant metastasis in accordance with Turnbull modification.
Results:
A total of 152 patients with CRC were included, 84 males (55%) and 68 females (45%) with a male to female ratio of 1.2:1.0. The mean age was 57.4 ± 12.92 years (range 21–87 years). 18 (11.8%) patients were below 40 years of age. The most common presenting symptoms were rectal bleeding and abdominal pain and were together present in 71% of the patients. The majority (67.8%) of tumors arise from rectum and sigmoid colon. More than one-third of the patients had poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Sixty patients (39.5%) presented in stage D, whereas 30.9% (47/152) and 29.6% (45/152) of patients were in stage B and stage C, respectively. None of the patients had stage A at presentation. The radiological evaluation showed presence of liver metastasis in 14 patients (9.2%) and pulmonary metastasis in two patients (1.3%). Anemia was found in 56 patients (36.8%). It was more common in females (P = 0.01) and in the right sided tumors (66.7%) than left sided tumors (29.5%) (P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
The majority of CRC patients in Benghazi were diagnosed in locally advanced or metastatic stage. In order to achieve early detection of CRC, a comprehensive cancer education program and screening of high risk population for CRC should be considered in this part of Libya.
Keywords: Colon cancer, colorectal carcinoma, epidemiology, Libya
INTRODUCTION
The epidemiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) varies remarkably from one country to another depending upon various genetic and environmental factors.[1,2] Globally, nearly 800,000 new CRC cases are believed to occur each year, which account for approximately 10% of all incident cancers, and mortality from CRC is estimated at nearly 450,000/year.[1] It is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancer related morbidity and mortality in North America, Western Europe and Australia, with a high mortality rate among males and females.[3,4,5] Based on the reports of the World Health Organization, approximately 87,500 new cases are diagnosed annually.[6] The incidence of the disease is higher in the elderly, with >90% of cases are older than 55 years of age.[7]
In Libya, CRC is the most prevalent gastrointestinal tract (GIT) malignancy in both males and females.[8,9] Since the information regarding CRC is very limited in Libya we decided to analyze the pattern of patients with CRC seen in two tertiary hospitals, Benghazi, Libya from January 2007 through to December 2009 with a view to determine various epidemiological and clinicopathological features of this disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All cases of CRC who were presented to the Oncolgy Department, Aljomhoria Hospital and 7th October Hospital, Benghazi, Libya between the period January 2007 and December 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. CRC patients were identified through hospitals discharge diagnostic codes. Data were analyzed for age, gender, symptoms at the time of diagnosis (early symptoms), sub-site distribution in the colon, and histopathologic diagnosis. Tumor staging of CRC was carried according to Astler Coller modification of Duke's system,[10] dividing it into stage A to C depending upon the extent of local involvement and regional node spread. Stage D was added to account for distant metastasis in accordance with Turnbull modification.[11]
The collected data were analyzed in SPSS statistical software version 19.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Descriptive statistics in the form of mean, standard deviations and frequency with percentages were calculated for interval and categorical variables, respectively. Chi-square test between categorical variables and Student's t-test for interval variables was used as appropriate. Results were considered to be statistically significant if P value (two-tailed) was <0.05. Ethical approval was obtained from the research ethical committee of Al-Arab Medical University, Benghazi, Libya.
RESULTS
A total of 152 patients with CRC were included in the present study; 84 were males (55%) and 68 were females (45%) with a male to female ratio of 1.2:1.0 (P > 0.05). Their ages at diagnosis ranged from 21 to 87 years with a mean age of 57.4 ± 12.92 years. Eighteen (11.8%) patients were below 40 years of age. The majority of cases (92 patients, 60.5%) were between 50 and 70 years of age. Figure 1 shows the distribution of patients in various age groups. The overall age standardized ratio (ASR) in the 2 years period was 15.24 per 100,000 and was higher for men (16.14 per 100,000) compared to women (13.89 per 100,000) [Table 1]. Furthermore, ASR was estimated 2.26 per 100,000 for individuals aged <40 years. The incidence rate of CRC increased with age and highest rates were observed in the oldest age groups. The most difference in rates by sex was among individuals above age of 50 years [Table 2].
Figure 1.

Distribution of age at diagnosis of 152 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed
Table 1.
ASR of colorectal cancer according to sex in the 2 years study period/100,000 population

Table 2.
Symptoms and signs at presentation of patients with colorectal cancer

The presenting symptoms and signs are summarized in Table 2. The most common presenting symptoms were rectal bleeding and abdominal pain and were present in 108 patients (71%). The most common sign on physical examination was palpable abdominal mass found in 20 patients (13.2%), followed by intestinal obstruction in 10 patients (6.6%). Six patients (3.9%) had a documented history of polyps diagnosed previously and only two patients (1.3%) had past long history of ulcerative colitis. No patient had history of Crohn's disease. Data regarding anatomic distribution, histologic type and tumor staging of CRC are shown in Table 3, with majority (103 patients, 67.8%) of tumors arising from rectum and sigmoid colon. Tumors originating from transverse colon, ascending colon and cecum accounted for 20.4% of cases (31 patients). More than one-third (38.8%) of the patients had poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The majority of CRC patients were diagnosed in locally advanced or metastatic stage (29.6% [45/152] in stage C and 39.5% [60/152] in stage D), whereas 30.9% (47/152) of the patients were in stage B. None of the patients had stage A at presentation. The radiological evaluation showed presence of liver metastasis in 14 patients (9.2%) and pulmonary metastasis in two patients (1.3%). As shown in Table 3, there was no statistical significant difference between males and females in the mean age, anatomic distribution, histologic type and tumor staging of CRC (P > 0.05 for all comparisons).
Table 3.
Basic data of CRC according to the gender of patients

Anemia (hemoglobin of <12 g/dl) was found in 56 patients (36.8%) [Table 3]. It was more common in females than males (33 females [48.5%] vs. 23 males [27.2%], P = 0.01) and in the right sided tumors than left sided tumors (20 patients [66.7%] vs. 36 patients [29.5%] respectively, P = 0.001).
DISCUSSION
The present study represents the pattern of CRC seen in two tertiary hospitals in eastern Libya. In fact both Aljomhoria and 7th October Hospitals are university hospitals affiliated to Al-Arab Medical University, Benghazi, Libya. During the study period, Aljomhoria Hospital acts through the Oncology Department, as the central cancer referral center involved in the medical management of all diagnosed cancers, including CRC, from the eastern part of the country. 7th October Hospital, on the other hand, was the major hospital where all elective GIT surgeries were performed during the study period. It is noteworthy to mention that both these two hospitals have diagnostic codes for every disease including CRC.
Even though, both hospitals have an important roles in management of newly diagnosed cancers and are a major referral centers, this study has some limitations, mainly due to its retrospective type, including generalization, lacking data and the accuracy of the data in patients' records. Regarding the current medical practice in Libya, CRC screening is not done neither in general nor in selected high risk patients, and cases are considered individually mainly based on the symptoms and/or signs of suspected CRC. This fact as well as lack of awareness in Libyan population of the importance of screening could explain why the majority of CRC cases in this study were diagnosed at the end stage of the disease. In some areas of Libya, particularly in the large cities, people have more access to specialized centers and may be screened by their own physicians but it is not always the case.
The pattern of male to female ratio observed in the present study was comparable to those identified in a previous study from Libya.[8] In contrast to Western data,[12] wherein there is a significant preponderance of male distribution (male vs. female 2:1), we found no significant difference between gender and CRC. Age impacts CRC incidence more than any other demographic factor. Previous studies show that the incidence of sporadic CRC increases dramatically above the age of 50 years for all groups.[13,14] The data in the present cohort suggested an older age distribution of CRC; this is in agreement with western reports, which emphasized that >80% of CRCs occurs above 50 years of age.[13,15] In the present study, we found the peak age at diagnosis to be between 5th and 7th decades, suggesting that CRC is primarily a disease of the middle and old age groups in eastern Libya. However, the fact of the late presentation of majority of the CRC cases as well as presence of a substantial number of young adults (11.8%) with CRC in this study should be bearing in mind when physicians see young patients with large bowel symptoms.
Based on the available data on CRC in Libya,[8,9,16] a stricter adaption of screening program for early detection of CRC is likely necessary. Cost-effectiveness is a main reason behind this concept, especially if it is correlated to national mortality data, the available screening methods, resource availability, and population preference. Both potentially invasive (i.e. colonoscopy) and noninvasive methods (i.e. fecal occult blood testing and stool DNA detection methods) used for CRC screening. Currently, there is no sufficient epidemiological data in Libya to support starting of screening at a lower age group.[16] However, proper identification of cases of familial causes of CRC high risk groups such as ulcerative colitis and Lynch syndrome and other familial causes of CRC is necessary, as these groups should be managed differently.
Classically, colon cancer was believed to be a disease of the left or distal colon.[15,17] However, the incidence of right-sided or proximal colon cancer has been increasing in North America and Europe.[18,19,20,21] Similar trends have been observed in Asian countries.[15,22] In the present study, only small number (19.7%) of the patients had right-sided or proximal colon cancer. This might be due to the genetic factors that may preferentially involve the chromosomal instability pathway, which might be predominant in left-sided colon and rectal cancers.
In general, cancer incidence and mortality rates have been higher in economically advantaged countries.[17] This may be related to consumption of high-fat dairy products and high-red-meat diet, and physical inactivity with resulting obesity.[23,24] Yet, if dietary and lifestyle factors in lower income groups start to mirror those in higher income groups in the years to come, the differences in CRC incidence and mortality rates may start to be further converge.
In contrast to other reports,[15] anemia was common in our population and it should be considered as a possible screening test in at risk or symptomatic patients for early detection of CRC particularly in patients within and above the 5th decade of age.
CONCLUSION
We have had very few reports on the epidemiology of CRC in Libya.[8,9,16] We found no significant difference between gender and location or types of CRC. Distal CRC was more prevalent. Furthermore, the present study clearly demonstrated that the majority of CRC patients in Benghazi were diagnosed at late stage of the disease either in locally advanced or metastatic stage. In order to achieve early detection of CRC, a comprehensive cancer education program and a stricter adaption of screening program for early detection of CRC as well as screening of high risk population for CRC should be considered in this part of Libya.
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil.
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1893–907. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999;49:33–64, 1. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.49.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cancer Facts Figures 2002. New York: The American Cancer Society, Inc. Surveillance Research; 2002. pp. 20–6. 02-250 M-NO 5008. 02. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boyle P, Langman JS. ABC of colorectal cancer: Epidemiology. BMJ. 2000;321:805–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7264.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boyle P, Leon ME. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Br Med Bull. 2002;64:1–25. doi: 10.1093/bmb/64.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Janaut V, Kollarova H. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. 2001. [Last access on 2013 Jul 12]. Available from: http://www.proquest.Umi.com . [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Liu JH, Etzioni DA, Livingston EH, Ko CY. Rates of colon and rectal cancers are increasing in young adults. Am Surg. 2003;69:866–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Elzouki AN, Alkomsi S. Pattern of primary gastrointestinal tract cancer in the eastern part of Libya. Garyounis Med J. 2005;4:24–8. [Google Scholar]
- 9.El Mistiri M, Verdecchia A, Rashid I, El Sahli N, El Mangush M, Federico M. Cancer incidence in eastern Libya: The first report from the Benghazi cancer registry, 2003. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:392–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Astler VB, Coller FA. The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg. 1954;139:846–52. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195406000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Turnbull RB, Jr, Kyle K, Watson FR, Spratt J. Cancer of the colon: The influence of the no-touch isolation technic on survival rates. Ann Surg. 1967;166:420–7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196709000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bosetti C, Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Levi F, Chatenoud L, Negri E, et al. Cancer mortality in Europe, 2005-2009, and an overview of trends since 1980. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2657–71. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mitry E, Benhamiche AM, Jouve JL, Clinard F, Finn-Faivre C, Faivre J. Colorectal adenocarcinoma in patients under 45 years of age: Comparison with older patients in a well-defined French population. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:380–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02234737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Isbister WH. Malignant neoplasia of the colon, rectum and anus at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre. Ann Saudi Med. 1992;12:429–33. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.1992.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pahlavan PS, Kanthan R. The epidemiology and clinical findings of colorectal cancer in Iran. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2006;15:15–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.El Mistiri M, Pirani M, El Sahli N, El Mangoush M, Attia A, Shembesh R, et al. Cancer profile in Eastern Libya: Incidence and mortality in the year 2004. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1924–6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Qing SH, Rao KY, Jiang HY, Wexner SD. Racial differences in the anatomical distribution of colorectal cancer: A study of differences between American and Chinese patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:721–5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Obrand DI, Gordon PH. Continued change in the distribution of colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1998;85:246–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00507.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kemppainen M, Räihä I, Sourander L. A marked increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer over two decades in southwest Finland. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:147–51. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)81761-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Malila N, Hakulinen T. Epidemiological trends of colorectal cancer in the Nordic countries. Scand J Surg. 2003;92:5–9. doi: 10.1177/145749690309200102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jess P, Hansen IO, Gamborg M, Jess T. Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. A nationwide Danish cohort study challenging the categorisation into right-sided and left-sided colon cancer. BMJ Open. 2013;3:1–7. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sung JJ, Lau JY, Goh KL, Leung WK. Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: Implications for screening. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:871–6. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70422-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fung T, Hu FB, Fuchs C, Giovannucci E, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ, et al. Major dietary patterns and the risk of colorectal cancer in women. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:309–14. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.3.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ganesh B, Talole SD, Dikshit R. A case-control study on diet and colorectal cancer from Mumbai, India. Cancer Epidemiol. 2009;33:189–93. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
