Skip to main content
Nutrition & Diabetes logoLink to Nutrition & Diabetes
. 2014 Sep 1;4(9):e133. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2014.32

Plasma amino acid profiles are associated with insulin, C-peptide and adiponectin levels in type 2 diabetic patients

H Nakamura 1, H Jinzu 1, K Nagao 1,*, Y Noguchi 1, N Shimba 2, H Miyano 1, T Watanabe 3, K Iseki 4
PMCID: PMC4183973  PMID: 25177913

Abstract

Objectives:

Plasma-free amino acid (PFAA) profiles have been associated with a future risk of developing diabetes or cardiovascular disease in nondiabetic subjects. These PFAA alterations might predominantly result from the metabolic shift caused by insulin resistance and visceral fat deposition. The variety of PFAA profiles within diabetic subjects is not well researched. In this study, we focused on type 2 diabetic subjects and examined the association between PFAA profiles and insulin- and glucose-related variables.

Methods:

Fifty-one Japanese subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were recruited from an outpatient clinic. The plasma concentrations of 21 amino acids; glucose-related markers including glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), glycoalbumin and 1,5-anhydroglucitol; insulin-related markers including insulin, C-peptide, and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; and adipocytokines including adiponectin and leptin were determined. The association of PFAA and other metabolic profiles were analyzed, and stratified analyses of the PFAAs and clinical characteristics were performed according to the fasting plasma insulin and HbA1c levels. In addition, the PFAA indices that correlate to visceral fat obesity were evaluated.

Results:

Although strong correlations between PFAAs and glucose-related markers were not observed, several amino acids (branched-chain amino acids, tryptophan, alanine, tyrosine, glutamate and proline) and PFAA indices that evaluate visceral obesity were highly correlated with insulin-related markers and adiponectin (P<0.001). In the group of diabetic patients with hyperinsulinemia, the amino acid levels were significantly increased, which generally demonstrated good concordance with insulin-related markers and adiponectin levels.

Conclusions:

The PFAA profiles in diabetic patients were strongly associated with hyperinsulinemia and hypoadiponectinemia, which might become risk evaluation factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases.

Introduction

Several recent reports showed that the plasma-free amino acid (PFAA) profiles are altered before the development of type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular events. The Framingham Offspring Study recently revealed that the PFAA levels, particularly the levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and aromatic amino acids, were significantly associated with a future diagnosis of diabetes mellitus1 and cardiovascular diseases.2 We previously revealed that several amino acids were significantly altered in Japanese people with high visceral obesity independent of their body mass index (BMI).3 In addition, a specific formula incorporating six amino acid values (alanine (Ala), glycine (Gly), glutamate (Glu), tryptophan (Trp), tyrosine (Tyr), and BCAA) was developed for discrimination of subjects with high visceral fat accumulation by multivariate logistic regression analyses, and this formula was strongly correlated with visceral fat deposition independent of the BMI. Because hyperinsulinemia and the development of type 2 diabetes are strongly associated with visceral obesity, diabetic patients are expected to show different plasma amino acid patterns and a higher value of this index. Although the plasma concentrations of some amino acids have been reported to be altered in diabetic patients compared with those of healthy individuals,4 the relationships between PFAA concentrations and the index value or other biochemical markers such as glucose- and insulin-related variables, particularly within subjects with type 2 diabetes, remain unclear.

Adipocytokines are key modulators of insulin sensitivity that carry information regarding visceral and subcutaneous fat deposition to other tissues.5,6 Adiponectin is known as an adipose tissue-derived insulin sensitizer, and it modifies glucose homeostasis and exhibits anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic effects.7 Insulin resistance is a major pathophysiological factor of diabetes, and adiponectin, given its strong association with insulin sensitivity and its underlying mechanism to sensitize insulin, is hypothesized to be centrally involved in the events leading to diabetes.7 This finding is supported by extensive epidemiological data8,9 linking lower adiponectin levels to disease states including type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and cancer. Another adipocytokine, leptin, is a protein that circulates in proportion with the body fat mass and provides information regarding the nutritional status and subcutaneous fat mass to neural centers that regulate feeding behavior, appetite and energy expenditure.6 In addition, leptin levels are reported to be an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease.10 Although many studies show the relationship between these adipocytokines and the development of diabetes, research examining the relationships between plasma amino acid concentrations and adipocytokines in diabetic subjects are limited.

In this study, we measured glucose- and insulin-related variables and plasma amino acid concentrations in people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. The PFAA concentrations and amino acid index values that evaluate visceral fat accumulation were analyzed according to their fasting plasma insulin or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. Their correlations with adipocytokines such as adiponectin and leptin were examined. Through these analyses, we characterized the PFAA profiles and amino acid indices in type 2 diabetic patients.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the ethics committees of Ajinomoto Co., Inc. All the subjects gave their written informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. All the data were analyzed anonymously throughout the study. The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000011594.

Subjects

This study was a cross-sectional evaluation of the relationship between the PFAA profiles and insulin- and glucose-related variables in 51 Japanese subjects who had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and were under treatment at the Iseki Internal Medicine. The participants were patients over the age of 20 years who have no serious health problems including cardiovascular diseases. The exclusion criteria at the beginning of the study were pregnancy, mental disorders and cancer. Hypertension and dyslipidemia occurred with type 2 diabetes in 37% (19/51) and 39% (20/51) of the subjects, respectively. According to the criteria, obesity was defined as a BMI of 30 kg m2 or greater, and overweight was defined as a BMI of 25 kg m2 or greater; 18% (9/51) and 55% (28/51) of the patients were categorized as obese or overweight, respectively. Seventy-one percent (36/51) of the patients were taking antidiabetic drugs at the time of the blood collection. The smoking status was not recorded.

Analysis of metabolic variables and hormones

Blood samples (5 ml) were taken from forearm veins after overnight fasting. The serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride were determined enzymatically. The fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were measured using the hexokinase method, and HbA1c was determined using the latex agglutination immunoassay. The plasma levels of glycoalbumin (GA), 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), insulin, C-peptide, leptin and adiponectin were measured immunologically. The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated using the following equation: HOMA-IR=Fasting insulin level (μU ml−1) × Fasting plasma glucose level (mg dl−1) / 405.11 For evaluating insulin resistance with HOMA-IR, FPG should be less than 140 mg per day, and thus, the analysis of HOMA-IR in this study has limitations.

PFAA measurement

The blood samples in tubes containing disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) were immediately placed on ice. The plasma was prepared by centrifugation at 3000 r.p.m. at 4 °C for 15 min and then stored at −80 °C until analysis. The plasma samples were deproteinized with acetonitrile at a final concentration of 80% before measurement. The plasma amino acid concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry followed by precolumn derivatization, as described previously.12, 13, 14 The following 21 amino acids were measured: Ala, alpha-aminobutyric acid (a-ABA), arginine (Arg), asparagine (Asn), citrulline (Cit), Glu, glutamine (Gln), Gly, histidine (His), isoleucine (Ile), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), ornithine (Orn), phenylalanine (Phe), proline (Pro), serine (Ser), threonine (Thr), Trp, Tyr and valine (Val). We calculated two ‘amino acid indices' based on the PFAA levels, which correlate with visceral fat deposition by computed tomography scanning.3 The amino acid index-1 is the multivariate PFAA logistic regression model that discriminates subjects with high visceral fat area (⩾100 cm2) consisting of Ala, Gly, Glu, Trp, Tyr and BCAA, whereas the amino acid index-2 is the multiple linear regression model with variable selection to model the relationships between the PFAA profiles with the visceral fat area, consisting of Ala, Asn, Gly, Trp, Tyr and Val.3

Statistical analysis

The statistical and multivariate analyses such as the cluster analysis and correlation analysis were performed with the JMP 9.0.0 program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The hierarchical cluster analysis by Ward's method was performed on the basis of the relative value of each individual variable. The data in the tables are expressed as the mean±s.d. Student's t-test was used to compare the variables between the high and low groups of fasting plasma insulin or HbA1c levels. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. To evaluate the correlations among the variables, Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated.

Results

Cluster analysis of PFAA levels and other variables

A total of 51 subjects with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the study. To clarify the network structure between PFAA and other variables, cluster analysis was performed on the basis of the relative value of each variable in this study (Figure 1). The colored blocks represent the plasma amino acid concentrations and variables of each individual sample. Red represents a relatively high concentration, and green represents a relatively low concentration. Although the patients were all diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, their amino acid profiles were markedly different from each other, and some distinguishable clusters formed. Glu was in the same cluster as insulin-related variables such as insulin, C-peptide and HOMA-IR. In addition, Ala and Pro were categorized in the same group as leptin and BMI. Adiponectin was categorized in the cluster containing BCAAs and Trp, which was different from leptin, one of the major adipocytokines. The lipid variables (low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride) and the glucose-related variables (FPG, HbA1c, GA and 1,5-AG) formed their own clusters that contained no amino acids. We could not find a specific tendency regarding the drugs used in this study.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cluster analysis of plasma amino acid and other clinical variables in type 2 diabetic patients. The dendrograms obtained from the hierarchical cluster analysis of the plasma amino acids and some clinical variables relating to glucose, insulin resistance and lipid homeostasis in 51 type 2 diabetes patients are shown. Ward's method was used for the analysis. The red block represents a relatively high level and the green block represents a relatively low level. The dotted line represents the cluster branches of the dendrogram. HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride.

Characteristics of the subjects enrolled in the study

To unveil the relationship between the PFAAs and insulin or glucose-related markers, the subjects were classified into two groups according to their fasting plasma insulin concentrations or HbA1c. The fasting insulin values ranged from a minimum of 2.1 μU ml−1 to a maximum of 32.2 μU ml−1 (male: 3.1–32.2 μU ml−1, female: 2.1–16.1 μU ml−1). The HbA1c values ranged from a minimum of 5.1% to a maximum of 9.4% (male: 5.1–9.4%, female: 6.1–8.6%). The cutoff values of the insulin concentration and HbA1c between the high and low groups were 7.1 μU ml−1 and 7.5% in males and 9.1 μU ml−1 and 7.1% in females, respectively.

The age, BMI, sex and metabolic variables within each group are summarized in Table 1. Greater levels of C-peptide and HOMA-IR and lower adiponectin concentrations were observed in the hyperinsulinemia group in both sexes. Significant differences in BMI, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride and leptin between the high and low insulin groups were observed only in the female subjects. The group with higher HbA1c levels exhibited higher levels of FPG and GA and lower 1,5-AG levels in both sexes. These results indicate that the plasma fasting insulin concentration and HbA1c levels are independent of each other. We could not find a specific tendency of the use of antidiabetic drugs regarding the insulin levels, whereas higher ratio of taking the drugs was observed in the female group with higher HbA1c level.

Table 1. Clinical variables according to the fasting plasma insulin and HbA1c levels.

  Total Insulin
HbA1c
 
 
High
Low
P-value
High
Low
P-value
    male N=12 female N=14 male N=11 female N=14   male N=12 female N=14 male N=11 female N=14  
Insulin (μU ml−1)
 M 10.1±7.8 14.9±8.2 4.8±1.2 0.0006*** 9.7±7.7 10.5±8.2 0.8061
 F 8.6±3.4 11.3±1.9 5.8±2.0 <0.0001*** 8.8±2.9 8.4±4.0 0.7505
               
HbA1c (%)
 M 7.4±1.2 7.5±1.3 7.3±1.1 0.7389 8.4±0.7 6.4±0.7 <0.0001***
 F 7.2±0.6 7.2±0.7 7.1±0.6 0.8383 7.7±0.4 6.7±0.3 <0.0001***
               
Age (years)
 M 52.3±10.3 50.2±7.9 54.7±12.4 0.3006 48.8±11.2 56.3±8.0 0.0804
 F 55.8±11.5 54.6±13.4 56.9±9.7 0.6203 55.9±10.6 55.6±12.8 0.9365
               
BMI (kg m2)
 M 27.0±4.9 28.3±5.4 25.6±4.0 0.1970 27.0±6.0 27.0±3.6 0.9804
 F 26.3±4.6 28.1±5.3 24.5±3.0 0.0315* 26.1±3.1 26.5±5.9 0.8055
               
FPG (mg dl−1)
 M 150.5±36.5 158.7±44.6 141.5±23.9 0.2707 168.2±34.6 131.2±28.8 0.0114*
 F 143.6±32.2 144.6±30.6 142.6±34.8 0.8774 160.6±34.1 126.6±19.0 0.0031**
               
GA (%)
 M 20.0±4.4 19.7±4.8 20.3±4.2 0.7362 22.2±4.3 17.6±3.3 0.0093**
 F 19.8±2.8 19.5±2.6 20.1±3.0 0.5839 21.4±2.6 18.1±1.9 0.0006***
               
1,5-AG (μg ml−1)
 M 7.5±4.7 7.4±5.1 7.6±4.6 0.9188 4.6±2.7 10.7±4.5 0.0008***
 F 7.7±4.6 7.5±5.1 7.8±4.4 0.8712 5.2±4.6 10.1±3.3 0.0032**
               
HDL cholesterol (mg dl−1)
 M 51.8±9.7 49.6±10.2 54.2±9.0 0.2675 51.5±10.3 52.1±9.6 0.8884
 F 58.0±11.6 53.5±9.1 62.5±12.5 0.0379* 60.1±12.0 55.9±11.2 0.3387
               
LDL cholesterol (mg dl−1)
 M 128.3±31.7 132.4±29.8 123.3±34.8 0.5155 125.8±40.4 130.7±21.7 0.7261
 F 137.4±27.9 142.9±24.5 131.8±30.8 0.2991 137.8±29.4 136.9±27.4 0.9370
               
Triglyceride (mg dl−1)
 M 184.4±100.4 212.5±122.2 153.7±61.4 0.1658 190.2±125.7 178.1±68.7 0.7807
 F 115.1±49.4 135.6±35.8 94.6±53.7 0.0252* 116.9±43.3 113.3±56.4 0.8495
               
C-peptide (ng ml−1)
 M 2.2±0.8 2.7±0.7 1.7±0.3 0.0003*** 2.3±0.9 2.1±0.7 0.6231
 F 1.8±0.5 2.2±0.3 1.5±0.4 <0.0001*** 1.9±0.3 1.8±0.6 0.4412
               
HOMA-IR
 M 3.6±2.6 5.4±2.5 1.7±0.5 <0.0001*** 3.9±2.5 3.3±2.8 0.5985
 F 3.0±1.4 4.1±1.2 2.0±0.8 <0.0001*** 3.4±1.4 2.6±1.4 0.1437
               
Leptin (ng ml−1)
 M 7.8±4.7 9.6±5.4 5.8±2.7 0.0501 7.2±4.5 8.4±4.9 0.5259
 F 14.4±9.4 18.9±10.9 10.0±4.5 0.0093** 14.3±7.7 14.5±11.1 0.9593
               
Adiponectin (μg ml−1)
 M 6.3±2.2 5.3±1.5 7.3±2.4 0.0255* 5.6±1.3 7.0±2.7 0.1146
 F 6.9±2.6 5.4±2.1 8.3±2.3 0.0020** 6.2±2.1 7.5±2.9 0.1809
               
Antidiabetic drugs (taken/not taken)
 M 15/8 8/4 7/4 0.8789 8/4 7/4 0.8789
 F 21/7 11/3 10/4 0.6625 13/1 8/6 0.0291*

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; F, female; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GA, glycoalbumin; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; M, male.

Data are expressed as the mean±s.d. P-values were determined by Student's t-test or χ2 test () between high and low groups of fasting plasma insulin concentrations or HbA1c. Significant differences are highlighted in bold letters and shown as *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001.

PFAA profiles according to the fasting plasma insulin and HbA1c levels

Table 2 shows each plasma amino acid concentration according to the difference between the fasting plasma insulin levels and HbA1c. The plasma levels of Tyr, BCAAs (female), Met (female), Ala (female), Pro (male) and Glu (male) were significantly increased in the hyperinsulinemia group. According to the HbA1c levels, significant differences in the levels of PFAA between the high and low groups were only detected in Ile and Leu levels in female.

Table 2. Plasma amino acid concentrations according to the levels of fasting plasma insulin and HbA1c.

Group Total Insulin
HbA1c
 
 
High
Low
P-value
High
Low
P-value
    male N=12 female N=14 male N=11 female N=14   male N=12 female N=14 male N=11 female N=14  
Essential amino acids (μmol l−1)
 Val
  M 281.7±33.4 293.3±24.7 269.0±38.1 0.0822 289.2±27.5 273.5±38.6 0.2724
  F 249.3±40.6 268.5±40.5 230.1±31.3 0.0093** 263.3±47.8 235.3±26.7 0.0666
 Ile
  M 84.0±15.6 87.4±15.8 80.3±15.3 0.2862 85.0±14.9 83.0±17.1 0.7661
  F 67.0±12.1 73.7±9.9 60.4±10.5 0.0019** 71.9±12.5 62.2±9.8 0.0302*
 Leu
  M 156.5±19.4 162.4±14.5 150.1±22.7 0.1351 157.9±16.1 155.0±23.3 0.7347
  F 130.8±19.2 137.9±18.2 123.7±18.1 0.0483* 138.2±18.9 123.4±17.0 0.0391*
 His
  M 86.4±6.9 86.2±5.6 86.7±8.3 0.8828 84.1±6.3 89.0±6.7 0.0812
  F 79.3±12.8 80.0±10.4 78.5±15.1 0.7596 80.1±10.8 78.4±14.9 0.7293
 Phe
  M 64.7±9.2 65.6±9.1 63.8±9.8 0.6539 63.7±8.5 65.8±10.3 0.5979
  F 60.5±6.6 62.2±6.7 58.8±6.3 0.1779 60.3±5.0 60.7±8.1 0.8632
 Trp
  M 59.8±7.7 62.5±7.9 56.9±6.7 0.0869 60.2±7.3 59.4±8.6 0.7989
  F 51.6±7.8 54.1±6.6 49.2±8.3 0.0953 52.9±7.5 50.4±8.1 0.4049
 Met
  M 29.5±8.7 31.9±10.7 26.9±5.2 0.1756 29.8±11.4 29.2±4.9 0.8751
  F 24.2±4.1 25.7±2.7 22.6±4.7 0.0390* 25.2±3.4 23.1±4.6 0.1876
 Thr
  M 122.6±21.9 129.0±25.4 115.7±15.6 0.1512 118.8±21.1 126.8±23.0 0.3983
  F 114.7±27.0 116.7±17.8 112.6±34.4 0.6938 119.0±28.3 110.3±25.9 0.4030
 Lys
  M 206.7±29.7 211.7±30.4 201.3±29.4 0.4153 201.4±32.0 212.6±27.4 0.3790
  F 199.6±38.6 211.4±41.5 187.9±32.9 0.1096 209.5±34.7 189.8±41.1 0.1831
Non-essential amino acids (μmol l−1)
 Ser
  M 104.4±19.0 109.5±18.3 98.9±19.0 0.1873 101.6±20.2 107.6±18.0 0.4595
  F 105.7±22.2 98.4±17.2 113.1±24.7 0.0789 107.1±17.9 104.4±26.4 0.7518
 Gly
  M 194.5±31.4 189.1±23.3 200.4±38.6 0.4031 190.5±35.8 198.9±26.7 0.5326
  F 189.7±50.7 186.1±34.1 193.2±64.5 0.7213 188.3±35.6 191.0±63.8 0.8919
 Ala
  M 447.4±80.9 473.1±83.2 419.5±71.8 0.1149 449.4±91.4 445.4±72.2 0.9087
  F 422.5±83.8 462.6±81.9 382.3±66.3 0.0084** 445.8±65.0 399.1±95.8 0.1439
 Tyr
  M 73.3±15.7 80.9±17.1 65.1±8.7 0.0118* 76.2±20.3 70.2±8.1 0.3703
  F 63.5±10.2 68.2±7.6 58.8±10.5 0.0115* 63.2±10.2 63.8±10.5 0.8732
 Glu
  M 43.9±16.1 51.5±18.7 35.7±6.6 0.0151* 42.4±9.3 45.6±21.7 0.6439
  F 32.9±15.3 33.8±17.6 30.5±9.8 0.5477 34.4±18.1 30.0±8.7 0.4169
 Pro
  M 181.2±50.6 203.0±58.2 157.4±26.8 0.0271* 192.4±57.6 169.0±41.0 0.2795
  F 157.3±60.5 171.7±49.2 142.9±68.8 0.2128 174.9±70.9 139.7±43.6 0.1256
 Gln
  M 584.0±60.0 569.5±64.8 599.8±52.7 0.2344 579.6±61.1 588.7±61.4 0.7235
  F 565.0±74.0 558.6±57.1 571.4±89.5 0.6553 570.7±66.4 559.3±83.0 0.6912
 Cit
  M 29.6±7.7 27.9±7.7 31.4±7.7 0.2934 26.9±6.5 32.5±8.2 0.0828
  F 26.5±9.9 25.4±10.0 27.5±10.0 0.5711 26.9±9.4 26.0±10.6 0.8043
 Arg
  M 99.4±15.6 101.0±14.8 97.7±17.0 0.6257 99.0±17.8 99.9±13.7 0.8984
  F 85.2±19.0 83.3±16.6 87.1±21.6 0.6061 83.7±18.7 86.6±19.9 0.6994
 Orn
  M 50.6±12.3 52.9±14.2 48.1±9.8 0.3627 49.7±15.8 51.6±7.5 0.7083
  F 48.8±10.4 49.6±11.5 48.1±9.4 0.7086 51.9±10.3 45.7±9.8 0.1162
 Asn
  M 47.9±5.5 48.8±5.9 46.9±5.0 0.4121 45.8±4.3 50.1±5.9 0.0596
  F 43.8±7.2 44.8±7.8 42.7±6.6 0.4612 44.8±5.5 42.8±8.6 0.4714
 a-ABA
  M 22.3±4.8 21.8±5.2 22.9±4.4 0.6019 22.2±6.3 22.5±2.6 0.8921
  F 21.7±6.7 20.8±5.7 22.6±7.7 0.4879 23.0±4.8 20.5±8.2 0.3231
 Amino acid index-1
  M 1.27±1.07 1.88±0.85 0.59±0.87 0.0018** 1.34±1.00 1.18±1.18 0.7267
  F 0.35±1.07 0.79±1.09 −0.09±0.88 0.0261* 0.63±1.14 0.07±0.95 0.1678
 Amino acid index-2
  M 17.0±3.4 18.6±2.7 15.2±3.3 0.0117* 18.0±3.6 15.8±2.9 0.1185
  F 15.5±3.7 17.3±3.3 13.6±3.2 0.0065** 16.2±3.9 14.7±3.6 0.2958

Abbreviations: F, female; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; M, male.

Data are expressed as the mean±s.d. P-values were determined by Student's t-test between high and low groups of fasting plasma insulin or HbA1c levels. Significant differences are highlighted in bold letters and shown as *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001.

The values of the amino acid indices (1 and 2) evaluating visceral fat accumulation from the PFAA profiles were much greater in the hyperinsulinemia groups in both sexes (amino acid index-1; 1.88±0.85 vs 0.59±0.87 in males, P<0.01, 0.79±1.09 vs −0.09±0.88 in females, P<0.05, amino acid index 2; 18.6±2.7 vs 15.2±3.3 in males, P<0.05, 17.3±3.3 vs 13.6±3.2 in females, P<0.01). The values were not affected by the difference in the HbA1c level in both sexes.

Correlation between PFAA and clinical profiles

Pearson's correlation coefficients between the PFAAs and the variables related to diabetes are shown in Table 3. The glucose-related variables such as FPG and HbA1c, which are widely used for the diagnosis of diabetes, were highly correlated with the other glucose-related variables such as GA and 1,5-AG (r=0.778 and −0.629 for FPG, r=0.761 and −0.758 for HbA1c, respectively) and showed low correlations with the insulin-related variables such as C-peptide, insulin and HOMA-IR.

Table 3. Pearson's correlation coefficients among plasma amino acid concentrations and clinical variables.

  BMI FPG HbA1c GA 1,5-AG C-peptide Insulin HOMA-IR Leptin Adiponectin
Coefficient of correlation
 Glucose related variables
  FPG −0.133 0.715*** 0.778*** 0.629*** 0.154 −0.094 0.321* −0.126 −0.017
 HbA1c −0.06 0.715*** 0.761*** 0.758*** 0.088 −0.154 0.133 −0.121 −0.176
                     
Amino acids
 Essential amino acids
  Val 0.109 0.221 0.401** 0.104 −0.240 0.275 0.228 0.309* −0.084 0.535***
  Ile 0.153 0.259 0.272 0.165 −0.236 0.280* 0.189 0.282* −0.054 0.534***
  Leu 0.128 0.251 0.289* 0.116 −0.163 0.238 0.252 0.330* −0.137 0.468***
  His 0.121 −0.091 −0.042 −0.089 0.058 0.049 0.020 0.013 −0.059 −0.027
  Phe 0.188 −0.234 −0.109 0.294* 0.214 0.086 0.213 0.062 −0.021 −0.188
  Trp 0.189 −0.181 0.049 −0.212 0.122 0.270 0.291* 0.182 0.060 0.440***
  Met 0.024 −0.038 0.190 −0.085 −0.099 0.224 0.197 0.153 −0.097 −0.172
  Thr 0.041 0.283* −0.045 −0.226 0.039 −0.004 0.096 −0.051 −0.042 −0.190
  Lys −0.006 0.277* 0.026 −0.248 0.090 0.073 0.161 0.035 −0.052 −0.205
 Non-essential amino acids
  Ser −0.113 0.289* −0.079 −0.187 0.196 −0.146 0.046 −0.09 −0.145 0.221
  Gly −0.137 −0.218 −0.162 −0.161 0.129 −0.157 −0.150 −0.219 −0.145 0.062
  Ala 0.376** 0.111 0.179 −0.050 −0.141 0.318* 0.306* 0.286* 0.254 0.524***
  Tyr 0.285* −0.019 0.195 −0.065 −0.048 0.426** 0.425** 0.386** 0.114 −0.248
  Glu 0.252 0.060 0.055 −0.044 −0.043 0.519*** 0.564*** 0.506*** 0.066 0.381**
  Pro 0.301* 0.243 0.325* 0.132 0.333* 0.317* 0.237 0.337* 0.279* −0.248
  Gln 0.039 0.336* −0.074 −0.168 0.048 −0.112 −0.060 −0.194 −0.047 0.028
  Cit −0.259 −0.064 −0.055 0.127 0.085 −0.154 −0.252 −0.236 −0.142 0.220
  Arg −0.033 −0.194 −0.028 −0.149 0.103 0.082 0.081 0.019 −0.087 0.082
  Orn −0.056 −0.153 0.033 −0.113 0.110 0.119 0.101 0.041 0.047 0.030
  Asn 0.151 −0.266 −0.111 −0.253 0.129 0.006 0.099 −0.043 −0.018 −0.146
  a-ABA −0.129 −0.025 0.165 −0.003 −0.031 −0.093 −0.053 −0.095 −0.202 −0.224
Amino acid index-1 0.342* 0.229 0.280* 0.071 −0.203 0.546*** 0.547*** 0.569*** 0.116 0.523***
Amino acid index-2 0.304* 0.324* 0.421** 0.164 0.298* 0.447** 0.387** 0.483*** 0.162 0.468***

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GA, glycoalbumin; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.

Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the correlations between plasma amino acid and glucose- or insulin-related variables. Significant correlations are highlighted in bold letters and shown as *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001.

The Ala, Pro and Tyr concentrations were significantly correlated with the BMI. The Ser, Gln, Thr and Lys concentrations were correlated with the FPG, and the Pro and BCAA concentrations were correlated with the HbA1c. Few amino acids were correlated with GA or 1,5-AG. However, Glu, Tyr, Ala, Pro and BCAAs were strongly correlated with the insulin-related variables such as C-peptide, insulin and HOMA-IR. The plasma adiponectin levels were highly correlated with Glu, Ala, Trp and BCAAs. No amino acid was significantly correlated with leptin. In addition, the amino acid indices exhibited a higher correlation with the insulin-related variables than with the glucose-related variables. The amino acid index-1 and -2 were highly correlated with adiponectin (r=−0.523 and −0.468, respectively), whereas no significant correlations were found with the leptin level.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated a variety of PFAA profiles in type 2 diabetic patients and reported that the PFAA profiles and amino acid indices evaluating visceral obesity showed good correlations with insulin-related variables and adiponectin concentrations.

In the network analysis with type 2 diabetic patients (Figure 1), the hierarchical cluster revealed that insulin-related variables such as plasma insulin, C-peptide and HOMA-IR were categorized into a group that was different from that of glucose-related variables such as FPG, HbA1c, GA and 1,5-AG. The concentrations of insulin-related variables did not differ between the two groups when divided by their HbA1c values (Table 1), and no significant correlations were found between insulin and FPG or HbA1c (data not shown). These data indicate that the insulin- and glucose-related variables were independent of each other, although it is generally known that hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia are related to each other in the process of developing diabetes. Some studies have reported that only the fasting insulin level and not the fasting glucose or HbA1c is associated with future coronary heart disease and stroke events,15 and insulin resistance predicted the subsequent onset of heart failure independently of established risk factors including diabetes,16 indicating their independent relationships. Our analysis revealed that the leptin level, and not the adiponectin level, was categorized into the identical group as the BMI, suggesting that both variables reflect different metabolic states. A previous study showed that adiponectin concentrations are more strongly influenced by the accumulation of visceral adipose tissue, whereas leptin levels are more affected by subcutaneous adipose tissue.5,6

Several studies have shown that the PFAA profiles in obese people are altered compared with those in healthy people.3,17 There have been few reports regarding the variety of amino acid profiles in type 2 diabetics. In this study, the cluster analysis revealed that the amino acid profiles were different depending on the insulin level in type 2 diabetic patients, and higher plasma concentrations of Glu, Pro, BCAAs and Tyr were observed in the higher insulin group (Figure 1 and Table 2). Some of the interrelationships among the PFAAs, such as strong correlations among BCAAs,18 were conserved in the patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. In addition, these amino acids, which were elevated in the higher insulin group, were elevated in visceral obesity (visceral fat area⩾100 cm2) compared with the healthy controls.3 They showed good concordance with insulin-related variables, suggesting that the plasma insulin level has a critical role in regulating the concentrations of these plasma amino acids. Because a fasting plasma insulin level of 11μU ml−1 is reported to be one of the criteria for hyperinsulinemia in a study enrolling Japanese subjects,19 most of the subjects in the higher insulin group in this study were in a state of hyperinsulinemia. These results suggest the strong relationship among the accumulation of visceral fat, the plasma insulin level (insulin resistance), and the PFAA profiles in type 2 diabetic patients. Recently, Badoud et al.20 have also revealed that serum levels of BCAAs and Glu were strongly correlated with HOMA-IR by the study comparing the amino acid profiles among lean healthy subjects, metabolically healthy obese subjects and metabolically unhealthy obese subjects, which sustains our results.

Concerning the association between diabetes and the plasma amino acid concentrations, Leutscher4 was the first to report that patients with severe untreated diabetes mellitus had higher fasting plasma amino acid levels and that the administration of insulin caused a rapid return of their levels to normal. Many groups have since reported the changes in amino acid profiles in insulin resistant states, particularly the increase in BCAA concentrations.21, 22, 23 The reason for the BCAA increase in blood was thought to be a lower uptake of BCAAs into the muscles caused by decreased insulin action and decreased utilization of amino acids in muscles.24 A recent study revealed that BCAAs are metabolized in visceral adipose tissues and muscles, and insulin resistance causes the decrease in the expression levels of adipose-tissue BCAA catabolizing enzymes.25,26 Higher concentrations of Ala, Tyr, Glu and Pro were observed in the hyperinsulinemia group; however, the underlying mechanism of these changes is unclear. No amino acids showed a significant correlation with the blood glucose-related variables. In addition, few amino acids were correlated with 1,5-AG, which is a marker of short-time glycemic control,27 indicating that the glycemic change during several days might have little effect on the plasma amino acid profiles.

We revealed that plasma amino acids such as Glu, Ala, Trp and BCAAs were negatively correlated with adiponectin concentrations (Table 3). These strong correlations were also reflected in the result of our clustering analysis that BCAAs and Trp were categorized into the same group as adiponectin (Figure 1). Since Ala was highly correlated with BMI, it was categorized in the group of leptin and BMI. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the significant relationships between plasma amino acid profiles and adiponectin levels in human. Adiponectin is the most abundant secreted protein and is expressed exclusively in adipose tissue; it plays a pivotal role in the regulation of insulin sensitivity and metabolism. Many groups have reported that adiponectin concentration is decreased in obese people or diabetic patients and is strongly related to insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia in humans.7, 8, 9 A recent study revealed that the injection of adiponectin into KKAy mice, which is a mouse model of obesity and/or type 2 diabetes, reversed insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia.28 Another group reported that changes in the plasma amino acid profile found in high-fat diet-induced mice were normalized by the injection of adiponectin.29 These results suggest that adiponectin levels might be the cause of insulin resistance or diabetes as well as likely factor for the metabolic shift that brings about changes in plasma amino acid profiles. However, the mechanism is still unknown.

We previously developed the ‘amino acid index' from different types of plasma amino acid concentrations for the discrimination of subjects with high visceral fat area (⩾100 cm2) by multivariate logistic regression analyses. The index showed a good correlation with visceral fat deposition independent of BMI or subcutaneous adipose tissue accumulation.3 In this study, we observed the significant correlations between amino acid indices evaluating visceral fat obesity and insulin-related variables or adiponectin concentration, indicating the strong association among visceral fat deposition, insulin resistance and plasma amino acid profile. These results did not show significant correlations with glycemic variables. However, HbA1c and FPG, which are used for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or the assessment of glycemic controls, were mainly correlated only with other glycemic variables such as 1,5-AG and GA, not with insulin-related variables or adiponectin. It is known that hyperinsulinemia or hypoadiponectinemia is the risk factor of coronary artery disease independent of fasting blood glucose.30,31 All of these data indicate that the indices determined from PFAA profiles may have the potential ability to assess the state of diabetic patients from the different viewpoint of the existing glycemic variables. To utilize these indices as monitoring markers, it is needed to study whether the normalization of the PFAA profile and the index values correlate with the improvement of insulin resistance or the increase in circulating adiponectin level.

Our study enrolling type 2 diabetic patients revealed that some amino acids and amino acid indices evaluating visceral fat obesity were strongly associated with insulin-related variables and plasma adiponectin levels, which are risk factors for developing cardiovascular diseases. This result stresses that PFAA profiles are hypothesized to be a useful marker for preventive diagnosis or healthcare assessment of diabetic patients. A prospective cohort study is needed for further investigation of whether changes in plasma amino acid concentrations occur prior to the changes in other metabolic variables such as insulin or adiponectin. Also, to investigate whether the index based on PFAA profiles can be used as an independent and early marker for health assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes, further studies of the prospective evaluation of the risk of developing future cardiovascular events in diabetic patients who had shown higher amino acid index values are needed.

Acknowledgments

KN, YN, NS, TW and KI designed the research; HN, HJ, KN and KI conducted the research; HN, HJ, KN and HM analyzed the data; HN and KN wrote the paper; and KN had the primary responsibility for the final content. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript. We thank Mr H Yoshida and Ms N Kageyama for the amino acid analyses.

HN, HJ, KN, YN, NS and HM are employees of Ajinomoto Co., Inc. TW is the CEO of Link and Communication Co., Inc. TW and KI received research grants from Ajinomoto Co., Inc. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article are declared.

References

  1. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Cheng S, Rhee EP, McCabe E, et al. Metabolite profiles and the risk of developing diabetes. Nat Med. 2011;17:448–453. doi: 10.1038/nm.2307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Magnusson M, Lewis GD, Ericson U, Orho-Melander M, Hedblad B, Engstrom G, et al. A diabetes-predictive amino acid score and future cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1982–1989. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yamakado M, Tanaka T, et al. Plasma amino acid profile is associated with visceral fat accumulation in obese Japanese subjects. Clin Obes. 2012;2:29–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2012.00039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Luetscher JA. The metabolism of amino acids in diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1942;21:275–279. doi: 10.1172/JCI101300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Park KG, Park KS, Kim MJ, Kim HS, Suh YS, Ahn JD, et al. Relationship between serum adiponectin and leptin concentrations and body fat distribution. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;63:135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2003.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ibrahim MM. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: structural and functional differences. Obes Rev. 2010;11:11–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00623.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kadowaki T, Yamauchi T, Kubota N, Hara K, Ueki K, Tobe K. Adiponectin and adiponectin receptors in insulin resistance, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1784–1792. doi: 10.1172/JCI29126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ziemke F, Mantzoros CS. Adiponectin in insulin resistance: lessons from translational research. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:258S–261S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28449C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li S, Shin HJ, Ding EL, van Dam RM. Adiponectin levels and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;302:179–188. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wallace AM, McMahon AD, Packard CJ, Kelly A, Shepherd J, Gaw A, et al. Plasma leptin and the risk of cardiovascular disease in the west of Scotland coronary prevention study (WOSCOPS) Circulation. 2001;104:3052–3056. doi: 10.1161/hc5001.101061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shimbo K, Oonuki T, Yahashi A, Hirayama K, Miyano H. Precolumn derivatization reagents for high-speed analysis of amines and amino acids in biological fluid using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009;23:1483–1492. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shimbo K, Yahashi A, Hirayama K, Nakazawa M, Miyano H. Multifunctional and highly sensitive precolumn reagents for amino acids in liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2009;81:5172–5179. doi: 10.1021/ac900470w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miyagi Y, Higashiyama M, Gochi A, Akaike M, Ishikawa T, Miura T, et al. Plasma free amino acid profiling of five types of cancer patients and its application for early detection. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lawlor DA, Fraser A, Ebrahim S, Smith GD. Independent associations of fasting insulin, glucose, and glycated haemoglobin with stroke and coronary heart disease in older women. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ingelsson E, Sundstrom J, Arnlov J, Zethelius B, Lind L. Insulin resistance and risk of congestive heart failure. JAMA. 2005;294:334–341. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.3.334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin FP, Montoliu I, Collino S, Scherer M, Guy P, Tavazzi I, et al. Topographical body fat distribution links to amino acid and lipid metabolism in healthy non-obese women. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Noguchi Y, Zhang QW, Sugimoto T, Furuhata Y, Sakai R, Mori M, et al. Network analysis of plasma and tissue amino acids and the generation of an amino index for potential diagnostic use. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:513S–519S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.2.513S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yamada N, Yoshinaga H, Sakurai N, Shimano H, Gotoda T, Ohashi Y, et al. Increased risk factors for coronary artery disease in Japanese subjects with hyperinsulinemia or glucose intolerance. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:107–114. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.2.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Badoud F, Lam KP, DiBattista A, Perreault M, Zulyniak MA, Cattrysse B, et al. Serum and adipose tissue amino Acid homeostasis in the metabolically healthy obese. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:3455–3466. doi: 10.1021/pr500416v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Newgard CB, An J, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Stevens RD, Lien LF, et al. A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009;9:311–326. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huffman KM, Shah SH, Stevens RD, Bain JR, Muehlbauer M, Slentz CA, et al. Relationships between circulating metabolic intermediates and insulin action in overweight to obese, inactive men and women. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1678–1683. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tai ES, Tan ML, Stevens RD, Low YL, Muehlbauer MJ, Goh DL, et al. Insulin resistance is associated with a metabolic profile of altered protein metabolism in Chinese and Asian-Indian men. Diabetologia. 2010;53:757–767. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1637-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pozefsky T, Felig P, Tobin JD, Soeldner JS, Cahill GF., Jr Amino acid balance across tissues of the forearm in postabsorptive man. Effects of insulin at two dose levels. J Clin Invest. 1969;48:2273–2282. doi: 10.1172/JCI106193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Herman MA, She P, Peroni OD, Lynch CJ, Kahn BB. Adipose tissue branched chain amino acid (BCAA) metabolism modulates circulating BCAA levels. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:11348–11356. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.075184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lackey DE, Lynch CJ, Olson KC, Mostaedi R, Ali M, Smith WH, et al. Regulation of adipose branched-chain amino acid catabolism enzyme expression and cross-adipose amino acid flux in human obesity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;304:E1175–E1187. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00630.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dungan KM. 1,5-anhydroglucitol (GlycoMark) as a marker of short-term glycemic control and glycemic excursions. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2008;8:9–19. doi: 10.1586/14737159.8.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Waki H, Terauchi Y, Kubota N, Hara K, et al. The fat-derived hormone adiponectin reverses insulin resistance associated with both lipoatrophy and obesity. Nat Med. 2001;7:941–946. doi: 10.1038/90984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu Y, Turdi S, Park T, Morris NJ, Deshaies Y, Xu A, et al. Adiponectin corrects high-fat diet-induced disturbances in muscle metabolomic profile and whole-body glucose homeostasis. Diabetes. 2013;62:743–752. doi: 10.2337/db12-0687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pyorala M, Miettinen H, Laakso M, Pyorala K. Hyperinsulinemia predicts coronary heart disease risk in healthy middle-aged men: the 22-year follow-up results of the Helsinki Policemen Study. Circulation. 1998;98:398–404. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.5.398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yamashita T, Matsuda M, Nishimoto O, Nakamoto K, Nishiyama H, Matsumoto K, et al. Combination of serum adiponectin level and metabolic syndrome is closely associated with coronary artery disease in Japanese subjects with good glycemic control. Intern Med. 2010;49:721–727. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.2897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nutrition & Diabetes are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES