Abstract
A number of non-canonical amino acids (NCAAs) with unstrained olefins are genetically encoded using mutant pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase- pairs. These NCAAs readily undergo inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder cycloadditions with tetrazine dyes, leading to selective labeling of proteins bearing these NCAAs in live cells.
Owing to its high selectivity, fast reaction kinetics, and non-catalytic nature, the inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder cycloaddition reaction between a tetrazine and an olefin has emerged as a state-of-the-art approach for selective bioconjugation in live cells.1 Previous efforts focused on applications of strained cyclic olefins or alkynes that react rapidly with tetrazines.2 However, similar applications with unstrained olefins have been largely overlooked except a recent report of metabolic glycan labeling,3 due to the common notion that the reaction between an unstrained olefin and a tetrazine is not kinetically favored. Here, we systematically analysed unstrained olefin-tetrazine reactions and showed that several unstrained olefins readily reacted with a tetrazine dye and a number of unstrained olefin-bearing NCAAs can be genetically incorporated into proteins in Escherichia coli for selective labeling with tetrazine dyes.
We first characterized the reaction kinetics between a tetrazine dye 10 (Figure 1) and a number of unstrained olefins in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at ambient temperature. Three alkenyl alcohols (allyl alcohol, 3-buten-1-ol, and 4-penten-1-ol) and NCAAs 5-8 (Figure 1) were chosen to undergo kinetic analysis. The alkenyl alcohols were used instead of their corresponding NCAAs 1-3 due to their high solubility in PBS buffer. Both 2 and 3 could hardly dissolve to more than 5 mM in PBS buffer. With this low solubility, their reactions with 10 were too long for reliable data collection. To test whether terminal and non-terminal olefins react differently with 10, 2-buten-1-ol was also included in the analysis. Since the inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder reaction is highly influenced by the dienophile electron density, vinyl ethers with electron-rich olefins, 2-hydroxyethyl vinyl ether that corresponds to NCAA 4, and 9 were also selected to undergo assays with 10. Conjugation of fluorescein to a tetrazine moiety such as in 10 inherently quenches the fluorescence from the fluorophore.1d Cycloaddition of the tetrazine moiety and an olefin abolishes this intrinsic quenching effect, leading to the rescue of fluorescence that can be readily detected with a fluorospectrometer. The reactions of all olefins with 10 were carried out in pseudo-first-order conditions in which the olefin concentration was at least 20-fold higher than the concentration of 10 (Supplementary Figures 1-10). The determined second-order reaction rate constants are presented in Table 1.
Figure 1.
(A) The tetrazine-olefin reaction; (B) unstrained olefin-bearing NCAAs; (C) two fluorescein-tetrazine dyes used in this study.
Table 1.
Determined second-order reaction rate constants between various olefin dienophiles and 10.
Entry | Olefin | k(10−3M−2s−1) |
---|---|---|
a |
![]() |
9.4 ± 1.2 |
b |
![]() |
1.9 ± 0.1 |
c |
![]() |
26 ± 5 |
d |
![]() |
36 ± 4 |
e |
![]() |
81 ± 1 |
f |
![]() |
1.2 ± 0.1 |
g |
![]() |
1.7 ± 0.2 |
h |
![]() |
11 ± 2 |
i |
![]() |
16 ± 1 |
j |
![]() |
19 ± 1 |
As shown in Table 1, all tested unstrained olefins reacted readily with 10 with second-order rate constants more than 0.001 M−1s−1. Both inductive and resonance effects of an olefin substituent significantly influence its reactivity with respect to 10.4 Electron withdrawing effects of the hydroxyl group and the amide group gradually diminish, correlating well to gradually improved reactivities from allyl alcohol to 4-penten-1-ol and 6 to 8, respectively. Two vinyl ethers, 2-hydroxyethyl vinyl ether and 9, display relatively higher reactivities toward 10 in comparison to other tested olefins due to the strong electron donating resonance effect of the vinyl ether oxygen atom. The sluggish reaction between 5 and 10 is attributed to the electron withdrawing resonance effect of the amide group. In comparison to the allyl alcohol, 2-buten-1-ol reacts significantly slower with 10, indicating that the methyl substituent adds steric hindrance. Although our kinetic analysis indicates much slower reactions with a tetrazine for unstrained olefins compared to strained ones,1e the determined second-order rate constants are comparable to those of the Staudinger ligation (k = 0.002 M−1s−1)5 and the copper-free dibenzocyclooctyne-azide cycloaddition (k = 0.0565 M−1s−1),6 two reactions that have been well adopted for bioconjugation in live cells. In comparison to strained olefins, unstrained olefins can be more easily prepared and are generally more stable toward cellular nucleophiles (except 5).7 Their genetic installation in proteins followed by selective bioconjugation with tetrazine dyes can potentially provide a simple and readily adoptable protein labeling approach in live cells.
Encouraged by our kinetic analysis, we proceeded to recombinantly synthesize proteins carrying site-specifically incorporated unstrained olefins in E. coli. We previously reported that a rationally designed pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS) mutant with two mutations, N346A and C348A, (PylRS(N346A/C348A)) together with is able to mediate the genetic incorporation of 1-4 into proteins at an amber codon in E. coli.8 This system was applied to synthesize four superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) variants with 1, 2, 3, or 4 incorporated at their S2 positions (sfGFP-1, sfGFP-2, sfGFP-3, and sfGFP-4). To synthesize the sfGFP variant with 5 incorporated at its S2 site (sfGFP-5), a previously evolved PylRS mutant PrKRS together with was used.9 Although systems for the genetic incorporation of 6-9 has not been described in the literature, our studies indicated that another previously evolved PylRS mutant BuKRS is able to recognize them as substrates.9 BuKRS together with was therefore applied for the synthesis of sfGFP variants with 6, 7, 8, and 9 at their S2 positions (sfGFP-6, sfGFP-7, sfGFP-8, and sfGFP-9) and the site-specific incorporation of 6-9 was verified by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis (Supplementary Figures 11-14). The sfGFP variants were purified and then subjected to the fluorescent labeling with 10 at physiological pH in PBS buffer before they were denatured and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Direct in-gel fluorescence detection showed strong fluorescent labeling of sfGFP-2, sfGFP-3, sfGFP-7, and sfGFP-8 (Figure 2). Labeling of sfGFP-1, sfGFP-5, and sfGFP-6 could be barely detected and, importantly, no labeling was observed for wild-type sfGFP. This labeling observation is consistent with the kinetic results in which 3-buten-1-ol, 4-penten-1-ol, 7, and 8 react more favorably with 10 compared to allyl alcohol, 5, and 6. Although 2-hydroxyethyl vinyl ether displayed fast kinetics when reacted with 10, sfGFP-4 did not show detectable labeling with 10 on the gel. This is likely due to the cleavage of the cycloaddition product from sfGFP-4 to generate an aromatized 1,2-diazine-fluorescein final product and a sfGFP-4 derivative with its vinyl group removed.4 Although a similar diazine formation reaction that followed the reaction between sfGFP-9 and 10 would retain the 1,2-diazine-fluorescein moiety to sfGFP-9, we did not observed fluorescein-labeled sfGFP-9 on the gel. Since a fluorescent small molecule band was detected in the gel (Supplementary Figure 15), we suspect that the final fluorescein-labeled sfGFP-9 was not stable and hydrolysed during the SDS-PAGE analysis that required harsh treatments such as heating at 100 degree for 5 min. In gels, sfGFP-2 and sfGFP-7 displayed integrated fluorescence intensities that were about 40% and 80% in comparison to sfGFP-3 and sfGFP-8 after their labeling with 10. The labeled sfGFP-3 was further subjected to the ESI-MS analysis that indicated close to 50% labeling efficiency (Supplementary Figure 16).
Figure 2.
Labeling of sfGFP variants with 10. The top panel shows Coomassie blue stained gels and the bottom panel presents the fluorescent imaging of the same gels before they were stained with Coomassie blue. Each protein (35 μM) was incubated with 0.5 mM of 10 in a 50 mM Tris-Cl buffer at pH 7.4 for 8 h before they were precipitated in 10% TFA, fully denatured with heating at 100 °C for 5 min, and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE. sfGFP with no NCAA incorporated was used as a control.
With the demonstration of the tetrazine reaction of unstrained alkenes for protein labeling in vitro, we then proceeded to test this reaction to label proteins bearing unstrained alkenes in live cells. Two previously constructed plasmids pEVOL-pylT-PylRS(N346A/C348A)8b and pETDuet-OmpXTAG9 were used to transform E. coli BL21 cells to express an E. coli outer membrane protein OmpX with 3 incorporated at its extracellular domain (OmpX-3). Plasmid pEVOL-pylT-PylRS(N346A/C348A) carried genes for PylRS(N346A/C348A) and and plasmid pETDuet-OmpXTAG contained a gene coding OmpX with an AAAXAA (A denotes alanine and X denotes an amber mutation) insertion between two extracellular residues 53 and 54. The transformed cells were grown in M9 minimal medium supplemented with 1% glycerol, 1 mM IPTG, 0.2% arabinose, and 5 mM 3 to express OmpX with 3 incorporated. After the expression of OmpX-3, cells were washed with PBS buffer and incubated with 10 (0.5 mM) in PBS buffer at room temperature for 8 h. The residual dye was removed by washing cells with isotonic saline. Finally the labeled cells were subjected to fluorescent microscope imaging. E. coli cells expressing OmpX-3 showed detectable fluorescence (Figure 3). In contrast, control cells that were grown in the absence of 3 did not display any fluorescence. A similar labeling reaction was carried out to label E. coli cells that expressed OmpX with 8 incorporated (OmpX-8). To express OmpX-8, plasmids pEVOL-pylT-BuKRS and pETDuet-OmpXTAG were used to transform E. coli BL21 cells. Plasmid pEVOL-pylT-BuKRS carried genes coding BuKRS and . OmpX-8 was expressed similarly as OmpX-3 except that the expression was done in LB medium. Since we noticed some background reaction between 10 and bovine serum albumin, we employed another tetrazine-fluorescein dye 11 that displayed a much lower reactivity toward cysteine than 10 for the following cell labeling analysis (Supplementary Figure 17). Cells were incubated with 11 (0.5 mM) for 8 h, washed with isotonic saline, and then subjected to fluorescent microscope imaging. Cells expressing OmpX-8 displayed strong green fluorescence. However, cells grown in the absence of 8 were not visibly labeled with 11. These results indicate that the unstrained alkene labeling reaction with a tetrazine is biocompatible and highly selective.
Figure 3.
Selective labeling of E. coli cells expressing OmpX-3 and OmpX-8. Labeling reactions were carried out in the presence of 0.5 mM 10 or 11 in the PBS buffer at pH 7.4 for 8 h. E. coli cells grown in corresponding media without NCAA supplemented served as controls (Ctrls). The left panels show bright-field images of E. coli cells, the middle panels show green fluorescent images of the same cells, and the right panels shows composite images of bright-field and fluorescent images. Scale bars represent 10 um.
In summary, we demonstrate that an unstrained olefin can react with a tetrazine dye with an appreciable reaction rate that allows selective labeling of proteins on the surface of live bacterial cells. Given its small size, easy preparation, and high stability, an unstrained olefin provides a significant advantage over a strained olefin in promoting the general adoption of the tetrazine labeling approach for cell biology studies. With a size comparable to alkyne and azide, an unstrained olefin can be similarly integrated into metabolic surrogates for cell labeling.3, 5, 10 Its biocompatible reaction with a tetrazine probe potentially provides an alternative tool for metabolic labeling research. That can be applied to investigate the temporal and spatial synthesis of DNA, RNA, proteins, and carbohydrates in live cells.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge financial support from the National Institute of Health (grant 1R01CA161158 to W.R.L.), the National Science Foundation (grants CHE-1148684 to W.R.L. and CHE-0848398 to A.D.), and the Welch Foundation (grant A-1715 to W.R.L.). J.T.K. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (grant NSF-0750733). We also thank Dr. Yohannes H. Rezenom from the Laboratory for Biological Mass Spectrometry at Texas A&M University for characterizing our proteins by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Synthesis, protein expression, protein labeling, and mass spectrometry analysis.
References
- 1.(a) Thalhammer F, Wallfahrer U, Sauer J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:6851. [Google Scholar]; (b) Knall AC, Slugovc C. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:5131. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60049a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Debets MF, van Berkel SS, Dommerholt J, Dirks AT, Rutjes FP, van Delft FL. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:805. doi: 10.1021/ar200059z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Devaraj NK, Weissleder R. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:816. doi: 10.1021/ar200037t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Karver MR, Weissleder R, Hilderbrand SA. Bioconjugate Chem. 2011;22:2263. doi: 10.1021/bc200295y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Carlson JC, Meimetis LG, Hilderbrand SA, Weissleder R. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52:6917. doi: 10.1002/anie.201301100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Blackman ML, Royzen M, Fox JM. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:13518. doi: 10.1021/ja8053805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Devaraj NK, Weissleder R, Hilderbrand SA. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19:2297. doi: 10.1021/bc8004446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Royzen M, Yap GP, Fox JM. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:3760. doi: 10.1021/ja8001919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Devaraj NK, Hilderbrand S, Upadhyay R, Mazitschek R, Weissleder R. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49:2869. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Taylor MT, Blackman ML, Dmitrenko O, Fox JM. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:9646. doi: 10.1021/ja201844c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Lang K, Davis L, Wallace S, Mahesh M, Cox DJ, Blackman ML, Fox JM, Chin JW. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:10317. doi: 10.1021/ja302832g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Liang Y, Mackey JL, Lopez SA, Liu F, Houk KN. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:17904. doi: 10.1021/ja309241e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Liu DS, Tangpeerachaikul A, Selvaraj R, Taylor MT, Fox JM, Ting AY. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:792. doi: 10.1021/ja209325n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Seitchik JL, Peeler JC, Taylor MT, Blackman ML, Rhoads TW, Cooley RB, Refakis C, Fox JM, Mehl RA. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:2898. doi: 10.1021/ja2109745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Lang K, Davis L, Torres-Kolbus J, Chou C, Deiters A, Chin JW. Nat Chem. 2012;4:298. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Plass T, Milles S, Koehler C, Szymanski J, Mueller R, Wiessler M, Schultz C, Lemke EA. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012;51:4166. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (l) Borrmann A, Milles S, Plass T, Dommerholt J, Verkade JM, Wiessler M, Schultz C, van Hest JC, van Delft FL, Lemke EA. Chembiochem. 2012;13:2094. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201200407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (m) Wan W, Tharp JM, Liu WR. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1844:1059. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Niederwieser A, Spate AK, Nguyen LD, Jungst C, Reutter W, Wittmann V. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52:4265. doi: 10.1002/anie.201208991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Meier A, Sauer J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:6855. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kovalev EG, Postovskii IY, Rusinov GL, Shegal IL. Chem Hetetrocycl Compd. 1981;17:1063. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Saxon E, Bertozzi CR. Science. 2000;287:2007. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Debets MF, van Berkel SS, Schoffelen S, Rutjes FP, van Hest JC, van Delft FL. Chem Commun. 2010;46:97. doi: 10.1039/b917797c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Agard NJ, Prescher JA, Bertozzi CR. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:15046. doi: 10.1021/ja044996f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Baskin JM, Prescher JA, Laughlin ST, Agard NJ, Chang PV, Miller IA, Lo A, Codelli JA, Bertozzi CR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:16793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707090104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Gordon CG, Mackey JL, Jewett JC, Sletten EM, Houk KN, Bertozzi CR. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:9199. doi: 10.1021/ja3000936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Jewett JC, Sletten EM, Bertozzi CR. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:3688. doi: 10.1021/ja100014q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van Geel R, Pruijn GJ, van Delft FL, Boelens WC. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012;23:392. doi: 10.1021/bc200365k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Wang YS, Fang X, Wallace AL, Wu B, Liu WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:2950. doi: 10.1021/ja211972x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang YS, Fang X, Chen HY, Wu B, Wang ZU, Hilty C, Liu WR. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:405. doi: 10.1021/cb300512r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Tuley A, Wang YS, Fang X, Kurra Y, Rezenom YH, Liu WR. Chem Commun. 2014;50:2673. doi: 10.1039/c3cc49068h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Tharp JM, Wang YS, Lee YJ, Yang Y, Liu WR. ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9:884. doi: 10.1021/cb400917a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee YJ, Wu B, Raymond JE, Zeng Y, Fang X, Wooley KL, Liu WR. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:1664. doi: 10.1021/cb400267m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Breinbauer R, Kohn M. Chembiochem. 2003;4:1147. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200300705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang Q, Chan TR, Hilgraf R, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB, Finn MG. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:3192. doi: 10.1021/ja021381e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Clark PM, Dweck JF, Mason DE, Hart CR, Buck SB, Peters EC, Agnew BJ, Hsieh-Wilson LC. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:11576. doi: 10.1021/ja8030467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Dieterich DC, Link AJ, Graumann J, Tirrell DA, Schuman EM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:9482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601637103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.