Abstract
Canine demodicosis is a refractory skin disease caused by excessive proliferation of mite Demodex canis. Despite availability of several treatment options, the disease poses a great challenge to clinicians for its long term management as some drugs may be ineffective or toxic. Present report describes successful treatment of two refractory cases of canine demodicosis using homeopathy medicine. After oral administration of Graphitis 200 C two drops once daily for 2 months, complete cure from the disease was observed. No adverse health effects of the medication were recorded during the treatment. Thus, it may be concluded that homeopathy medicine may be used safely for long-term management of canine demodicosis.
Keywords: Canine, Demodicosis, Graphitis, Homeopathy, Mange
Introduction
Canine demodicosis, commonly known as red mange is an ectoparasitic skin infection of dogs caused by excessive proliferation of the microscopic cigar shaped mite, Demodex canis (Arthropoda: Archnida: Acari: Demodicidae), in hair follicles and sebaceous glands (Gortel 2006). The disease is often associated with folliculitis and furunculosis due to secondary bacterial or mycotic infections and is refractory in nature (Tarallo et al. 2009). Several treatment options with variable responses including amitraz rinses, oral ivermectin, milbemycin, moxidectin etc. are available (Muller 2004). Topical amitraz therapy was the first drug approved for canine generalized demodicosis. However, it is not always effective or well tolerated by the patient (Paradis 1999). Use of macrocyclic lactones also has certain limitations because their prolonged use may be associated with adverse effects (Muller 2004). The present report describes successful management of refractory cases of canine demodicosis to allopathic acaricides with homeopathy medicine Graphitis 200 C.
Case description
One 10 years old male Labrador dog, weighing around 23 kg was presented with more than 2 months old history of generalized hair loss and itching (Fig. 1). The deworming and vaccination were properly updated and the dog had otherwise no other problem. Skin scrapings was collected in 10 % potassium hydroxide and submitted for microscopic examination which revealed plenty of Demodex canis mites in different stages of development. Identification of mites was made by the method described by Urquhart (1996). Adult mites were cigar shaped with four pair of stubby legs in the thorax part of their body (Fig. 2). The case was diagnosed as generalized demodicosis and was treated with injection ivermectin @ 0.2 mg/kg body weight subcutaneously once weekly along with nutritional supplement (Syrup Nutricoat, 2 tsf twice daily). The condition did not respond well even after 1 month of the treatment, hence it was decided to start the homeopathy medicine. Liquid Graphitis 200 C (Dr. William Schwabe India Pvt. Ltd., Noida, India) was advised to give 2 drops once daily for 1 month. The owner reported marked improvement in condition; hence it was continued for one more month. The dog was presented again after an interval of 15 days for general examination. Marked improvement in condition was noticed (Fig. 3) and it completely cured after 2 months of the therapy as evident from skin scrapings negative for mange mite.
Fig. 1.

Labrador dog before treatment
Fig. 2.

Microphotograph of adult Demodex canis tiny, insect-like acarine with short, stubby legs ending in small blunt claws from the skin scraping (magnification ×40)
Fig. 3.

Labrador dog one and a half month after treatment
Another dog (8 years old, male Dalmatian breed, body weight 20 kg) was presented with a month old history of itching, hair loss, and scar formation, which was more severe in paws, limbs and facial regions. The problem started more than 1 year back and was treated intermittently by several drugs which have shown partial improvement and the condition relapsed within few weeks after end of the medication. Skin scraping was found positive for Demodex mite. Again Liquid Graphitis 200 C was advised to be given (2 drops once daily) for 2 months. After 1 month of treatment, the improvement in condition was evident as erythematous area reduced in size, alopecic patches disappeared and the owner was quite satisfied with the progress of therapy. There were no frequent episodes of itching and irritation shown by the dog.
Both localized and generalized canine demodicosis are common in dogs (Aujla et al. 2000). In localized form, the mite grows in a limited area over the body to produce skin lesions. Demodex overgrowth is often associated with predisposing factors such as endoparasitism, poor nutrition, immunosuppression or transient stress (Gortel 2006). The presence of more than five localized lesions on the body, or when two or more feet affected by parasitic lesions, are indicative of generalized infection (Ghubash 2006). In generalized form of the disease, the growth of parasite is rampant to cover wider skin areas and more conspicuous changes in skin and hair coat. In present case, the Labrador dog had generalized demodicosis, while the Dalmatian had localized form of the disease. Both were quite old cases, where the disease relapsed after stopping treatment or change in weather condition. Cases of dogs treated by field veterinarians without improvement in their condition has been reported earlier (Sood et al. 2012). Treatment with Graphitis gave quite good response and no recurrence was reported even after stopping the drug administration. Homeopathic drugs by far are safer than other treatment options available for canine demodicosis. Amitraz may cause toxicity after its oral intake in sufficient concentration (Hugnet et al. 1996). Moreover, response of treatment is also variable (Paradis 1999). Oral ivermectins are also not safe as some dogs may show toxicity symptoms when oral ivermectin or related drugs are given for long time for treatment of demodicosis (Merola and Eubig 2012). Therefore, Graphitis seems to be a safe and useful alternative drug for treatment of canine demodicosis. Few reports published in the past also reported good efficacy of homeopathic drugs in the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis (Bettenay 1998; Scott et al. 2002; Hill et al. 2009). However, the efficacy of homeopathic remedies in veterinary medicine is largely unproven and quite controversial, hence large-scale study is required to establish efficacy and safety profile of various homeopathy drugs in different breeds of canine.
References
- Aujla RS, Singla LD, Juyal PD, Gupta PP. Prevalence and pathology of mange-mite infections in dogs. J Vet Parasitol. 2000;14:45–49. [Google Scholar]
- Bettenay S. A double-blind trial evaluating homeopathic drops in the treatment of atopy in 20 dogs. In: Kwochka KW, Willemse T, Von Tscharner C, editors. Advances in veterinary dermatology. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998. pp. 508–509. [Google Scholar]
- Ghubash R. Parasitic miticidal therapy. Clinical Tech Small Anim Pract. 2006;21:135–144. doi: 10.1053/j.ctsap.2006.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gortel K. Update on canine demodicosis. Vet Clinics North Am Small Anim Pract. 2006;36:229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2005.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill PB, Hoare J, Lau-Gillard P, Rybnicek R, Mathie T. Pilot study of the effect of individual homeopathy on the pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis in dogs. Vet Rec. 2009;164:364–370. doi: 10.1136/vr.164.12.364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hugnet C, Buronrosse F, Pineau X, Cadore JL, Lorgue G, Berny PJ. Toxicity and kinetics of amitraz in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1996;57:1506–1510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merola VM, Eubig PA. Toxicology of avermectins and milbemycins (macrocylic lactones) and the role of P-glycoprotein in dogs and cats. Vet Clinics North Am Small Anim Pract. 2012;42:313–333. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2011.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muller RS. Treatment protocols for demodicosis: an evidence-based review. Vet Dermatol. 2004;15:75–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2004.00344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paradis M. New approaches to the treatment of canine demodicosis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1999;29:1425–1436. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(99)50136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott DW, William H, Miller, Senter DA, Cook CP, Kirker JE, Shaun MC. Treatment of canine atopic dermatitis with a commercial homeopathic remedy: a single-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Can Vet J. 2002;43:601–603. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sood NK, Mekkib B, Singla LD, Gupta K. Cytopathology of parasitic dermatitis in dogs. J Parasit Dis. 2012;36:73–77. doi: 10.1007/s12639-011-0083-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tarallo VD, Lia RP, Sasanelli M, Cafarchia C, Otranto D. Efficacy of amitraz plus metaflumizone for the treatment of canine demodicosis associated with Malassezia pacydermatitis. Parasit Vectors. 2009;2:13. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Urquhart GM (1996) Veterinary parasitology. 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 0-632-04051-3
