Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2014 Sep 12;193(8):4010–4020. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400481

IL-33 is an unconventional alarmin that stimulates IL-2 secretion by dendritic cells to selectively expand IL-33R/ST2+ regulatory T cells

Benjamin M Matta *, Jeremy M Lott *, Lisa R Mathews *,, Quan Liu *,, Brian R Rosborough *,§, Bruce R Blazar , Hēth R Turnquist *,
PMCID: PMC4185240  NIHMSID: NIHMS620669  PMID: 25217167

Abstract

Interleukin (IL)-33 is a recently characterized IL-1 family member that is proposed to function as an alarmin, or endogenous signal of cellular damage, as well act as a pleiotropic cytokine. The ability of IL-33 to potentiate both Th1 and Th2 immunity supports its role in pathogen clearance and disease immunopathology. Yet, IL-33 restrains experimental colitis and transplant rejection by expanding regulatory T cells (Treg) via an undefined mechanism. We sought to determine the influence of IL-33 on hematopoietic cells that drives Treg expansion and underlies the therapeutic benefit of IL-33 administration. Herein, we identify a feedback loop where conventional mouse CD11c+ dendritic cells (DC) stimulated by IL-33 secrete IL-2 to selectively expand IL-33R(ST2+) suppressive CD4+Foxp3+ Treg. Interestingly, this occurs in the absence of classical DC maturation, and DC-derived (innate) IL-2 increases ST2 expression on both DC and interacting Treg. ST2+ Treg represent an activated subset of Foxp3+ cells, demonstrated to be ICOShiCD44hi compared to their ST2 counterparts. Furthermore, while studies have shown that IL-33-exposed DC promote Th2 responses, we reveal that ST2+ DC are required for IL-33-mediated in vitro and in vivo Treg expansion. Thus, we have uncovered a relationship between IL-33 and innate IL-2 that promotes the selective expansion of ST2+ Treg over non-Treg. These findings identify a novel regulatory pathway driven by IL-33 in immune cells that may be harnessed for therapeutic benefit or for robust expansion of Treg in vitro and in vivo.

Introduction

IL-33 is a barrier tissue-expressed IL-1 family member1 that when released targets IL-1 Receptor-Like 1 (IL1RL1), more commonly referred to as ST2, to promote Th2 responses in T cells, mast cells, eosinophils, basophils, and innate lymphoid cell (ILC) populations2-6. Thus, the ST2/IL-33 axis plays a protective role in immunity against parasitic infection7, but may exacerbate pathologic conditions such as asthma8, arthritis9, eosinophilic pericarditis10 and dermatitis11. Recently, pleiotropic functions of IL-33 have emerged, with several reports supporting a role for IL-33 in promoting Th1 immune responses and anti-viral immunity12-14.

Although implicated in both Th1 and Th2 immunity, its’ capacity to limit Th1 and Th17 responses in vivo15,16 suggests a potential regulatory role for IL-33 and ST2 in controlling inflammation6. Likewise, in mouse models of cardiac transplantation, IL-33 administration prolongs fully MHC-mismatched allograft survival by reducing Th1-mediated IFN-γ production (in favor of elevated IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13) and increasing Forkhead box p3 (Foxp3)+ regulatory T cells (Treg) and CD11b+Gr-1int myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) systemically and in the graft17-19. Our group has demonstrated that prolongation of cardiac allograft survival by IL-33 monotherapy is dependent on Foxp3+ Treg18. Despite indications that IL-33 expands Treg18, the precise characterization of IL-33-expanded Treg and elucidation of the mechanisms contributing to their expansion is lacking. Given the ability of IL-33 to target CD11c+ DC18,20-22, and the critical role of DC in Treg homeostasis and expansion23,24, we tested the hypothesis that DC serve a critical function in orchestrating Treg expansion mediated by IL-33.

In the present study, we identified a new functional inter-relationship between IL-33 and IL-2 mediating selective Treg expansion. Specifically, while IL-33 fails to induce classical DC maturation, it stimulates IL-2 production by CD11c+ DC that is critical for expanding ST2-expressing Treg during interactions with CD4+ T cells. In connection, a significant reduction in ST2 expression on DC in the absence of IL-2 may dampen DC responsiveness to IL-33. We further demonstrate that ST2 on DC is critical for IL-33-mediated Treg expansion, as use of St2−/− DC in vitro and depletion of CD11c+ DC in vivo inhibits this function of IL-33. Collectively, our findings establish an important immunoregulatory function of IL-33 carried out through a novel mechanism of CD11c+ DC-mediated Treg expansion. These data highlight the IL-33/ST2 axis as a potential target for development of therapeutic modalities aimed at promoting immune regulation or expansion of Treg.

Materials and Methods

Animals and IL-33 administration

Male C57BL/6J (B6; H2Kb), BALB/c (H2Kd), B6.FVB-Tg(Itgax-DTR/EGFP)57Lan/J (CD11c-DTR), and B6.129P2-IL2tm1Hor/J (IL-2−/−) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). BALB/c St2−/− mice were obtained from Dr. Andrew N.J. McKenzie and bred for experimental use25. C57BL/6-Foxp3tm1Flv/J (Foxp3-IRES-mRFP; FIR) reporter mice26 for breeding were graciously provided by Dr. Fadi Lakkis. All mice were housed in the specific pathogen-free facility at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Recombinant(r) mouse(m) IL-33 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) was dissolved in PBS and injected intraperitoneally (0.5 μg/m/day(d); for 10 d). Control animals received PBS alone. Experiments were conducted under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol and in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines. Animals were fed a diet of Purina rodent chow (Ralston Purina, St. Louis, MO) and received food and water ad libitum.

Propagation, purification, and treatment of CD11c+ DC

CD11c+ bone marrow (BM)-derived DC were propagated from total BM cells using rmGM-CSF (1000U/ml; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) alone or in combination with rmIL-4 (1000 U/ml; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) and harvested on d 7 as described18,27,28. Briefly, culture medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4 was replenished every 2 d and CD11c+ cells were purified using magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) on d 7. Purified CD11c+ cells were cultured overnight in unsupplemented RPMI media or RPMI supplemented with 100 ng/ml LPS (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY) or 20 ng/ml IL-33.

T cell isolation and mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR)

T cells were purified from spleens of wild-type (WT) B6, B6 FIR, or BALB/c mice. Red blood cell-lysed, single-cell suspensions were incubated with anti-CD45R/B220, anti-CD16/CD32, anti–TER-119, anti–I-A/I-E, anti-CD11b, and anti-Ly6G/Ly6C obtained from BD Biosciences. For CD4+ T cells, anti-CD8α, or CD8+ T cells, anti-CD4, were included. Non-T cells were eliminated using Dynabeads (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Control, LPS, or IL-33 DC were used as stimulators in 5 d MLR of CellTrace Violet (CTV; Life Technologies; Grand Island, NY)-labeled CD4+ T cells at a 1:10 DC:T cell ratio. Recombinant human (h) rhIL-2 (50 U/ml; Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ), IL-33 (10 ng/ml), or anti-IL-2 (10 μg/ml; JES6-1A12; BioLegend) were added to the MLR as indicated in the figures and figure legends.

Suppression assays

Bulk CD4+ T cells were purified from PBS- or IL-33-treated, B6 FIR mice and stained for flow sorting (FACSAria, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) of RFP+(Foxp3+) CD4+ ST2+ or ST2 Treg. Alternatively, splenic B6 FIR CD4+ T cells were cultured with IL-33-exposed BALB/c DC and Treg were sorted after 5 d. Purity was consistently greater than 92%. Sorted Treg were tested for their ability to suppress CD3/CD28 T-activator bead (5×104; Life Technologies)-induced, CTV-labeled B6 CD4+ or CD8+ T cell proliferation at a ratio of 8:1 T effector to Treg (1×105:1.25×104). Where indicated, recombinant mouse IL-12 (5 ng/ml; BioLegend) alone or in combination with IL-33 (10 ng/ml) was used to induce IFN-γ in CD8+ T cell cultures. Cultures were harvested on d 4 for flow cytometric analysis of proliferation and IFN-γ by intracellular flow analysis.

Flow cytometric analysis

Flow cytometry data were acquired using an LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo v10 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Intracellular staining was carried out using Foxp3/Transcription Factor staining buffer set (eBioscience; San Diego, CA). All fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies were purchased from BioLegend, eBioscience, or BD Biosciences, except ST2 (MD Bioproducts; St. Paul, MN).

Cytokine quantitation

Supernatants from CD11c+ cells cultured for 18 h were harvested and IL-2 quantified using IL-2 Ready-SET-Go! (eBioscience) kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Other cytokines measured in DC supernatants were determined by Luminex (Life Technologies). IFN-γ, IL-17A, and IL-5 were quantitated in supernatants from MLR using ELISA Max kits (BioLegend) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Bone marrow chimeras and diphtheria toxin (DT) administration

Recipient B6 mice were given antibiotic-treated (Sulfatrim, Hi-Tech Pharmacal, Amityville, NY) water for 7 d prior to irradiation. Chimeric mice were generated by irradiating WT B6 recipient mice with 2 doses (900 cGy and 400 cGy) in a span of 6 hours. Two hours after the second radiation dose, mice received 1×107 syngeneic WT or CD11c-DTR B6 BM. Mice were continued on antibiotic-treated water for 7 d. For depletion of CD11c+ cells (starting 8 weeks post-bone marrow transplant; BMT), diphtheria toxin (DT; Sigma; St. Louis, MO) was administered (125 ng/mouse) every other day for 10 d (a total of 6 doses), and mice were euthanized 2 d after the last dose. Mice were also treated with PBS or IL-33 (0.5 μg/m/d; for 10 d) starting 1 d after the first DT treatment and ending 1 d after the last DT treatment. Spleens were harvested 1 d after the final treatment with IL-33 and total splenocytes stained for flow cytometric analysis.

Statistics

Statistical significance was determined by Student’s ‘t’ test, one- or two-way ANOVA where appropriate, using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software; San Diego, CA). A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. All experiments were carried out independently for a minimum of 3 times, unless indicated otherwise in the figure legends. All bar graphs represent statistical mean ± standard deviation.

Results

IL-33 expands an ST2+ subset of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells in the thymus and spleen

We reported previously that IL-33 systemically expands functionally-suppressive, Foxp3+ Treg that prolong experimental cardiac allograft survival17,18. Our precise characterization of the impact of IL-33 on Treg populations in the thymus and spleen now reveal that administration of IL-33 profoundly modulates Treg populations, particularly an ST2+ (IL-33R+) subset, in both primary and secondary lymphoid organs (Fig. 1). Interestingly, ST2+Foxp3+ cells were present at a low frequency in naïve, unmanipulated mice, comprising approximately ten percent of CD3+CD4+CD25+ cells found in both the thymus and spleen (Fig. 1A). Administration of IL-33 expanded CD4+CD25+ cells, particularly ST2+Foxp3+ cells, and in the spleen they approach a proportion similar to that of ST2Foxp3+ cells (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, IL-33 decreases the total number of cells in the thymus while increasing the total number of splenocytes (Fig. 1B), corresponding to a significant increase in total CD4+Foxp3+ cells, including ST2+Foxp3+ cells in the spleen (Fig. 1C). These data substantiate that ST2+Foxp3+ cells are an existing subset of Treg and are expanded following delivery of IL-33.

Figure 1. IL-33 administration expands an ST2+ subset of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells originating in the thymus.

Figure 1

(A) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequency of CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells from CD3+CD4+-gated total thymocytes or splenocytes from naïve or IL-33-treated (IL-33 Rx) C57BL/6J (B6) mice. (B) Absolute number of total cells and (C) indicated cell populations in the thymus and spleens averaged from n = 5 mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Phenotypic analysis of CD4+ Foxp3+ compared to Foxp3 cells (Fig. 2A) from untreated and IL-33-treated mice revealed expression of classical Treg markers on ST2+Foxp3+ cells, including PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, OX-40, LAP (TGF-β), CD39, CD73, CD103, and GARP (Fig. 2B). Several distinguishable characteristics of ST2+ Treg relative to their ST2 counterparts, especially following IL-33 administration, included higher GATA-3, ICOS, CD44 and CD69, with corresponding low expression of CD62L (Fig. 2B). Thus, ST2+Foxp3+ cells, while sharing expression of classical Treg markers, are distinct from their ST2Foxp3+ counterparts and display markers consistent with activated Treg29,30.

Figure 2. ST2+Foxp3+ cells express classical Treg markers and exhibit an activated phenotype.

Figure 2

IL-33 was administered to B6 mice for 10 d (0.5 μg/d, i.p.). On d 11, spleens were harvested and CD3+ cells were purified and stained for flow cytometric analysis. (A) Gating strategy on CD3+CD4+-gated cells and (B) expression of surface and intracellular markers on CD4+Foxp3 (G1; light grey; top), CD4+Foxp3+ST2 (G2; medium grey; middle), and CD4+Foxp3+ST2+ (G3; dark grey; bottom) cells as indicated in A. Bar graphs in B represent an average of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for each marker. Data are representative of an average of n = 5-9 individual mice from n = 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

IL-33-expanded Treg regulate effector T cell responses

We next tested the suppressive function of Treg from PBS- and IL-33-treated mice, including a comparative analysis of the ST2 and ST2+ subsets. We found at a Treg:T effector ratio where conventional Treg (Control ST2) failed to significantly suppress effector T cell proliferation, IL-33-expanded Treg exhibit significant suppressive capacity against both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3A). Although, ST2+ Treg consistently proved more potent then ST2 Treg, we did not observe a significant difference between the ST2 and ST2+ subsets isolated from IL-33-treated mice.

Figure 3. IL-33-expanded Treg suppress CD8+ effector T cell function.

Figure 3

B6 Foxp3-IRES-mRFP (FIR) mice were administered IL-33 (0.5 ug/d; for 10 d). CD4+ cells were purified on d 11 from total splenocytes and stained for flow sorting of CD4+ RFP(Foxp3)+ ST2 or ST2+ Treg. Sorted Treg were cultured with purified CellTrace Violet (CTV)-labeled, B6 CD4+ or CD8+ T cells at a Treg:Teffector ratio of 1:8 with CD3/CD28 T-activator beads for 4 d. Cultures were harvested and stained for flow cytometric analysis of T cell proliferation. (A) Representative flow plots and Division Index Relative to ‘No Treg’ group of T cell proliferation based on CTV dilution profile. (B) Representative flow plots and an average of IFN-γhiCD8+ T cells unstimulated or stimulated with 5 ng/ml IL-12 alone or in combination with 10 ng/ml IL-33. Data were generated from n = 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance in A and B were determined by one-way ANOVA. DI = Division Index. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Although much has been elucidated on the role of IL-33 and ST2 in promoting Th2 responses, work with our collaborators revealed that IL-12 induces ST2 expression on CD8+ T cells, thus promoting IL-33-augmented IFN-γ production13. Our present data recapitulate these observations (Fig. 3B). However, we also reveal that, while Treg from IL-33-treated mice did not inhibit CD8+ T cell IFN-γ driven by IL-12 alone, they potently suppressed IL-33-augmented CD8+ T cell IFN-γ expression (Fig. 3B). ST2+ Treg reduced IFN-γ production by approximately 50% and a displayed a trend towards greater suppressive capacity relative to ST2 Treg from IL-33-treated mice (Fig. 3B). In contrast, ST2 Treg from PBS-treated mice did not significantly impact IFN-γ expression at ratios examined (data not shown). In total, these data establish that IL-33-expanded Treg are effective T cell suppressors and are the first to make the important observation that IL-33-expanded Treg can limit IL-33-augmented IFN-γ production by CD8+ T cells.

IL-33-exposed DC promote Th2 cytokine responses and proliferation of ST2+Foxp3+ Treg in vitro

Administration of Flt3 ligand (L) in mice augments naturally-occurring Treg through a profound expansion of DC31,32. Yet, when we directly compared administration of IL-33 to Flt3L, IL-33 did not drastically augment CD11c+ cell numbers, despite its’ ability to increase the incidence of CD4+Foxp3+ Treg18. Thus, our past findings do not support increased DC numbers as a mechanism driving an increase in Treg following IL-33 delivery. However, DC express ST220,21,27 and therefore, we sought to determine if IL-33 expansion of Treg is mediated instead through a direct impact of IL-33 on DC function.

Consistent with previous observations21, DC exposed to IL-33 promoted Th2 responses in CD4+ T cells, manifested in increased secretion of IL-5, but not IFN-γ (Th1) or IL-17A (Th17) (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, we observed IL-33-exposed DC also promoted the proliferation of ST2+Foxp3+ Treg (Fig. 4B). Although TLR4 and ST2 are both part of the TLR/IL1R family, the function of IL-33-exposed DC was distinct relative to DC exposed to LPS, which augmented IFN-γ and IL-17A levels, but failed to increase IL-5 (Fig. 4A) or proliferation of ST2+ Treg (Fig. 4B). ST2+Foxp3+ cells expanded in vitro by IL-33-exposed DC expressed high levels of ICOS and CD44 (Fig. 4C), a phenotype that matches splenic ST2+Foxp3+ Treg expanded by IL-33 administration in vivo (Fig. 2B). Ex vivo-expanded ST2+ Treg were functionally suppressive (Fig. 4D). Confirming that ST2 expression on DC was central to this phenomenon, St2−/− DC were poor stimulators of ST2+ Treg proliferation (Fig. 4E) compared to WT (St2+/+) DC. This limited proliferation of ST2+ Treg occurred despite the addition of exogenous IL-33 in the MLR, and the presence of St2+/+ CD4+ T cells, which could potentially respond to IL-33 directly. Overall, these data support IL-33 targeting DC as a critical mechanism of ST2+ Treg expansion.

Figure 4. IL-33-exposed DC promote Th2 responses in allogeneic naïve CD4+ T cells and proliferation of ST2+Foxp3+ cells.

Figure 4

BALB/c BM-derived DC were generated in 7 d culture and CD11c-purified. CD11c+ cells were incubated for 18 h in medium alone, stimulated with LPS (100 ng/ml), or IL-33 (20 ng/ml), washed, and then used to stimulate CTV-labeled, naïve allogeneic B6 CD4+ T cells for 5 d. On d 5 (A) concentrations of IFN-γ, IL-17A and IL-5 in DC/T cell co-culture supernatants were quantitated by ELISA. (B) ST2+ and Foxp3+ CD4+ cells were quantitated by flow cytometry following surface and intracellular staining and averaged from n = 4 independent experiments. Dashed line (ST2) and solid line (ST2+) boxes correspond to populations in C. (C) Analysis of ICOS and CD44 expression on Foxp3+-gated cells expanded by IL-33-exposed DC shown in B (ST2, dashed; ST2+, solid). (D) BALB/c DC generated as described above were used to stimulate CD4+ T cells from B6 FIR reporter mice. Flow-sorted ST2+ Foxp3(RFP)+ CD4+ T cells from IL-33-exposed DC cultures displayed potent capacity to inhibit the anti-CD3/CD28-induced proliferation of CD4+CD25 T cells (Teff) at a ratio of 1 Foxp3+ cell to 8 Teff. (E) WT (St2−/−) or St2−/− BALB/c CD11c+ DC were cultured with CTV-labeled B6 CD4+ T cells in medium alone or supplemented with 10 ng/ml IL-33. After 5 d, proliferating ST2+Foxp3+ T cells (Foxp3+ cells from ST2+CTVlo gate in left panel) were quantified by flow cytometry and averaged from n = 4 independent experiments. Black boxes on flow plots indicate populations used to generate corresponding graphs. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

IL-33 stimulates IL-2 production by CD11c+ DC

Several groups have described limited phenotypic changes associated with the Th2-promoting capacity of DC exposed to IL-3321,22. However, mechanisms underlying the ability of IL-33-exposed DC to influence T cell responses are unknown. We characterized DC phenotype and cytokine production following overnight culture with IL-33, and compared these findings with DC exposed to LPS. In stark contrast to stimulation with LPS, exposure of BALB/c DC to IL-33 in vitro had a subtle impact on surface marker expression, as we observed a small but significant increase in CD86 and PD-L1, but no significant change in MHC class II (I-Ad), CD40, CD80, or PD-L2 (Fig. 5A). Similar results were observed when DC were propagated from B6 mice (data not shown). Furthermore, unlike LPS, IL-33 did not induce significant production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 5B), indicating that IL-33 fails to induce robust DC maturation. In fact, even when DC were pre-exposed to IL-33, they maintained their ability to respond to subsequent stimulation with LPS (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5. IL-33 induces IL-2 production by CD11c+ DC in the absence of classical phenotypic maturation.

Figure 5

BALB/c, B6 wild-type or IL-2−/− BM-derived CD11c+ DC were generated in 7 d culture and cultured for 18 h in medium alone or supplemented with IL-33 (20 ng/ml) or LPS (100 ng/ml) (A-E), or pre-exposed to IL-33 for 18 h or 2 h prior to stimulation with LPS (C). Cells were harvested and stained for flow cytometric analysis of surface marker expression (A,C) and supernatants were harvested for cytokine quantitation by (B) Luminex or (D) ELISA. Histograms (A) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. Data in (B,D) are representative of n = 4 (LPS) or n = 5 (Control; IL-33) independent experiments. (E) CD25 expression on BALB/c CD11c+ DC. For (C) * vs. Control, # vs. IL-33. ND = Not Detectable. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Past investigation revealed that IL-2 signaling promotes ST2 expression on CD4+ T cells33, and a growing body of literature suggests that pathogen-exposed DC are an unappreciated, yet significant source of IL-2 for T cells34,35. We now make the important observation that IL-33 stimulated a 5-6-fold increase in IL-2 secretion compared to levels produced by control DC (Fig. 5D and Supplemental Fig. 3). This finding was substantiated using IL-2−/− DC (Fig. 5D) and DC propagation conditions with (Fig. 5D) and without IL-4 (Supplemental Fig. 3). Interestingly, IL-33 did not increase CD25 expression on DC above levels on control DC, whereas LPS induced a 2.5 fold increase in its’ expression (Fig. 5E). Collectively, these data indicate that by maintaining low CD25 expression and significantly increasing IL-2 production, DC exposed to IL-33 provide a significant source of IL-2 to support ST2+ Treg expansion.

CD11c+ DC production of IL-2 is necessary for IL-33-mediated proliferation of ST2+ Treg

The role of IL-2 in driving T cell-mediated immune responses is well established36-38. More recently, DC delivery of IL-2 to Treg within the synapse has been suggested to facilitate Treg function and expansion39,40. Our data to this point argue that enhanced production of IL-2 by DC in response to IL-33 may be a critical mechanism through which IL-33 promotes ST2+ Treg proliferation. To test this, we added a neutralizing antibody against IL-2 to the MLR and observed complete inhibition of ST2+ Treg proliferation driven by IL-33-exposed DC (Fig. 6A-B). Importantly, IL-33-DC (and control DC + IL-33) demonstrated a preferential stimulation of ST2+Foxp3+ cells (Fig. 6C) over ST2Foxp3+ cells, and all Foxp3 T cells. To confirm that IL-2 produced by IL-33-exposed DC was critical for ST2+ Treg expansion, we repeated the experiment with DC propagated from IL-2−/− mice and observed that, unlike WT DC, IL-33-exposed IL-2−/− DC did not expand ST2+ Treg beyond that of their untreated counterparts (Fig. 6D). Interestingly, IL-2−/− DC also showed reduced expression of ST2 and CD25 (Supplemental Fig. 1). Overall, these data indicate that innate IL-2 signaling in DC is necessary for steady-state expression of ST2 and presumably, their subsequent ability to respond to IL-33 with IL-2 production that drives selective expansion of ST2+ Treg.

Figure 6. CD11c+ DC-derived IL-2 promotes selective expansion of ST2+ Treg following IL-33 exposure.

Figure 6

CD11c+ (A-C) BALB/c, (D) WT B6, or IL-2−/− DC were cultured overnight in media alone or supplemented with IL-33 (20 ng/ml). DC were cultured in MLR with CTV-labeled (A-C) B6 FIR or (D) BALB/c CD4+ T cells for 5 d. Some wells were supplemented with IL-33 (10 ng/ml), neutralizing IL-2 antibody (10 μg/ml), rhIL-2 (50 U/ml), or a combination as indicated. After 5 d, cells were harvested and stained for flow cytometric analysis. Representative flow plots and an average of (A) Foxp3 and (B) Foxp3 and ST2 expression on CD4+-gated cells or (C) ST2 expression versus CTV on CD4+ Foxp3+ (top panels) and CD4+Foxp3 (bottom panels) cells. Results in (A-C) were averaged from n = 4 independent experiments. (D) Representative flow plots of ST2 expression versus CTV on CD4+Foxp3+ cells from cultures with WT B6 or IL-2−/− DC and averaged from n = 3 independent experiments. The graph represents the fold change in proliferating ST2+ cells with IL-33 DC versus Control DC for WT and IL-2 KO. Black boxes on flow plots indicate populations used to generate corresponding graphs. AU = Arbitrary Units for fold change reported in graphs in (C,D). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

In both control DC and IL-33-exposed DC cultures, exogenous IL-2 alone did not significantly expand ST2+ Treg, nor did it augment IL-33-mediated ST2+ Treg expansion (Fig. 6A-B). Instead, the addition of exogenous IL-2 did display a trend towards increasing the incidence of ST2+ non-Treg (Fig. 6C). Addition of IL-33 to control DC cultures, however, profoundly increased ST2+ Treg (Fig. 6) and this effect was ablated by addition of anti-IL-2 antibodies (Fig. 6). Thus, treatment of DC with IL-33, either before or during culture with CD4+ T cells, supports the selective expansion of suppressive ST2+ Treg over ST2 Treg, and non-Treg.

Following IL-33 administration (Fig. 2B) or culture with IL-33-exposed DC (Fig. 4C), ICOShiCD44hiST2+ Treg are the dominant expanded Treg population. However, the addition of anti-IL-2 reduced ICOShiST2+ Treg incidence to the same level of that of control DC alone (Supplemental Fig. 2A), and similar results were observed for CD44hiST2+ Treg (Supplemental Fig. 2B). Correspondingly, unlike WT DC, IL-33-exposed IL-2−/− DC failed to significantly increase either CD44hi or ICOShi ST2+Foxp3+ cells (Supplemental Fig. 2C). These in vitro data further support a mechanism where IL-2 production by IL-33-exposed DC underlies ICOShiCD44hiST2+ Treg proliferation and correlate with our ex vivo analysis of ST2+ Treg following IL-33 administration (Fig. 2B). These data lend strong support for DC as the critical mediators of IL-33-induced expansion of ST2+ Treg in vivo.

CD11c+ DC mediate expansion of ST2+ Treg by IL-33 in vivo

The ability of IL-33 to increase Treg in vivo is dependent on expression of ST218, and the present data reveal that IL-33-exposed DC expand ICOShiCD44hiST2+ Treg in vitro that parallel those expanded by IL-33 in vivo. The failure of St2−/− DC to expand ST2+ Treg suggests DC may promote this phenomenon in vivo. To test this, we generated BM chimeras whereby WT B6 mice were reconstituted with BM from CD11c-DTR mice, or WT B6 as controls. Recipient mice were subsequently administered diphtheria toxin (DT) to effectively deplete CD11c+ DC concurrently during IL-33 administration (Fig. 7A). Non-irradiated controls, mice reconstituted with WT B6 BM, and mice reconstituted with CD11c-DTR BM all show significant expansion of ST2+ Treg following IL-33 treatment as compared to PBS-treated controls (Fig. 7B). As reported previously32, administration of DT alone to CD11c-DTR chimeric mice reduced the frequency of total CD4+Foxp3+ Treg (Fig. 7B). While depletion of CD11c+ cells alone did not modulate incidence of existing ST2+Foxp3+ cells, IL-33 administration failed to expand ST2+ Treg when CD11c+ cells were ablated concurrently (Fig. 7B). These critical data are in accord with our findings in vitro and again reveal that although T cells, including Treg, may express ST2, IL-33 does not facilitate expansion of ST2+ Treg in the absence of CD11c+ DC that can respond to IL-33.

Figure 7. Ablation of CD11c+ cells during IL-33 administration prevents IL-33-mediated expansion of ST2+Foxp3+ Treg in vivo.

Figure 7

(A) Representative flow plots and frequency of CD11c+ splenocytes in CD11c-DTR BM chimeras receiving PBS, IL-33, DT, or DT + IL-33. (B) Representative flow plots and frequency of CD4+-gated, ST2+Foxp3+ Treg in PBS or IL-33-treated control mice (No BMT) and irradiated mice reconstituted with WT B6 or CD11c-DTR BM and treated with DT alone, or DT + IL-33. Flow plots are representative and graphs are an average of n = 3-9 mice per group from n = 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Discussion

IL-33 is expressed by epithelial and endothelial cells in most organs1,41,42 and pro-inflammatory cytokines or TLR ligands increase its expression in tissues and myeloid cells14,43-46. Any means supporting IL-33 secretion are uncertain, yet unprocessed IL-33 is functional when released during necrosis6,47. Thus, IL-33 is described as an “alarmin”, or endogenous factor activating immune responses when released from damaged tissue14,48-50. DC, expressing TLR/IL1R family members like TLR4 and ST220,21,27, are well equipped to recognize alarmins, such as IL-33 or high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), which like LPS, targets TLR451. Both LPS and HMGB1 “mature” DC into potent immunostimulatory cells that provide the ample MHC, costimulatory molecules, and IL-1β, −6, −23, and IL-12p70 needed for Th1 and Th17 polarization52. Likewise, it has been recently established that IL-12p70 potently inhibits Treg proliferation53. Thus, IL-33 is an unconventional alarmin that fails to induce classical DC maturation or support Th1 immunity. While we substantiated a capacity of IL-33-exposed DC to generate Th2 responses21, we establish that IL-33-exposed DC support expansion of ST2+Foxp3+ Treg. In total, these data suggest IL-33 is an unconventional alarmin that preserves DC in a relatively immature state, but induces functional changes mediating their ability to polarize naïve T cells into Th2 effectors and expand Treg.

DC have the ability to produce IL-2 following TLR stimulation34,35 and our present analysis revealed significantly elevated IL-2 production by DC following overnight stimulation with IL-33. When DC were generated from BM in GM-CSF and IL-4, IL-33 stimulated more IL-2 production by DC compared to LPS, whereas LPS induced increased IL-2 compared to IL-33 when DC were propagated using GM-CSF alone. Nonetheless, IL-33 induced a significant increase over control DC in both culture conditions, and the overall fold increase was similar in DC from cultures with GM-CSF with or without IL-4. Also, while we observed lower IL-2 produced by DC generated in GM-CSF alone in response to LPS compared to amounts previously reported54, our studies utilized 100-fold less LPS (100 ng/ml vs. 10 μg/ml). In total, these data demonstrate that IL-33 stimulates DC IL-2 secretion in vitro and suggests that DC signaling induced by IL-4, or closely related IL-13, may shape ST2 signaling to promote IL-2 secretion.

IL-33 initiates ST2 signaling that leads to activation of NFAT and AP-155,56, two transcription factors that are critical for IL-2 production38. Interestingly, NFAT family members have also recently been implicated in the regulation of monocyte and macrophage TLR-mediated responses57. As ST2 is a member of the TLR/IL-1R superfamily, our observation that IL-33, like LPS, induces IL-2 is consistent with a common signaling pathway shared between TLR4 and ST27. However, IL-33 induces IL-2 production yet fails to initiate the profound DC maturation triggered by LPS exposure. Given these different functional outcomes, it will be important to complete future studies identifying overlap and divergence in NFAT, AP-1, and other pathways in DC involved in TLR-IL-1R family signaling following IL-33 stimulation to that generated by TLR ligands, such as LPS.

IL-2 is known to induce ST2 expression by CD4+ T cells, especially in conjunction with IL-3333,58. Moreover, IL-2 is both important for Th2 differentiation59 and critical for Treg development37,39,60. We demonstrate that neutralization of IL-2 in the presence of IL-33-exposed DC completely blocks ST2+ Treg expansion. Since activated T cells are a major source of IL-236, the importance of DC-derived IL-2 in ST2+ Treg expansion was established using DC generated from IL-2−/− mice. Significantly, IL-33-exposed IL-2−/− DC failed to induce proliferation of ST2+ Treg over that of untreated DC, which is in contrast to their WT counterparts. The importance of IL-2 derived from IL-33-exposed DC in selective ST2+ Treg expansion is further supported by our observation that addition of exogenous IL-2 alone to control or IL-33-exposed DC-T cell co-cultures failed to significantly augment ST2+ Treg proliferation. In total, our data support DC delivery of IL-2 to CD25hi Treg, potentially into the DC:Treg synapse40, as a driving factor underlying the ability of IL-33-exposed DC to selectively support proliferation of ST2+ Treg over other T cell subsets during interactions with the bulk CD4+ T cell population. However, our studies do not rule out the possibility that non-DC sources of IL-2, in the presence of IL-33 and TCR stimulation provided by DC, could contribute to ST2+ Treg proliferation. Further mechanistic studies into the relationships between TCR stimulation and DC/T cell IL-2 and IL-33 signaling are clearly warranted.

ST2+ cells, including Treg, are present in non-IL-33-treated mice, and the failure of IL-33 to expand ST2+ Treg in vivo when CD11c+ cells are depleted supports a dominant role for DC driving ST2+ Treg expansion. Since IL-33 only slightly modulates CD11c+ DC incidence18, it is unlikely that IL-33 expands Treg through amplification of DC numbers, as does Flt3L31. That IL-33 fails to potently expand ST2+ Treg in interacting CD4+ T cells when DC are St2−/− also supports IL-33 induced changes in DC underlying their ability to expand ST2+ Treg. We do not find evidence that IL-33 increases DC IL-33 message nor induces IL-33 secretion (data not shown), suggesting IL-33-exposed DC do not secrete IL-33 to directly expand ST2+ Treg. However, additional experimentation is necessary to precisely define if ST2-mediated cross-presentation of IL-33 by DC plays any role in the expansion of ST2+ Treg or how the function and homeostasis of ST2+ Treg are impacted by IL-33 once innate IL-2 has initiated their expansion.

A related and intriguing finding was that LPS induced a prominent increase in CD25 expression on DC, whereas IL-33 did not. Presumably, this permits maximum availability of innate IL-2 to target local cells. Furthermore, IL-2−/− DC themselves exhibit reduced ST2 expression, supporting a mechanism where innate IL-2 facilitates both autocrine and local cell expression of ST2. Based on these data, we propose a regulatory loop where innate IL-2 regulates ST2 expression on local leukocytes to promote Th2 responses and preferentially expand ST2+ Treg (Fig. 8).

Figure 8. IL-33 stimulates IL-2 secretion by CD11c+ DC that drives ST2 expression and ST2+ Treg expansion.

Figure 8

LPS signaling through TLR4 induces classical DC maturation characterized by upregulation of costimulatory molecules and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12 that drive Th1 immune responses in naïve CD4+ T cells. DC exposed to LPS secrete little IL-2, but upregulate CD25 to deplete available IL-2. A baseline level of IL-2 secretion is required for expression of ST2 on DC in the steady-state which may control their ability to respond to IL-33. Exposure of DC to IL-33 enhances their production of IL-2 but does not alter expression of costimulatory molecules or pro-inflammatory cytokine production. CD25 levels remain constant, thus allowing for maximum bioavailability of IL-2 for T cells. DC-derived IL-2 promotes ST2 expression and expansion of ICOShiCD44hiFoxp3+ Treg which constitutively express high levels of CD25. IL-2 may also support ST2 expression on naïve CD4+ T cells and promote the development of Th2 responses by IL-33-exposed DC.

We previously demonstrated that administration of IL-33 requires recipient ST2 expression and Treg to promote heart transplant survival18. The present examinations reveal that ST2+ Treg are present in the primary and secondary lymphoid organs of naïve mice and profoundly expand after IL-33 administration with the assistance of DC. A population of ST2 expressing Treg was shown recently to infiltrate damaged muscles and facilitate their repair61. Thus, ST2+ Treg may possess unique biologic functions in addition to their demonstrated suppressive capacity. Other groups have described CD44hi and ICOShi Treg subsets that exhibit enhanced suppressor function compared to their corresponding counterparts29,30. We found that ST2+ Treg exhibited the greatest suppressor activity against CD8+ effector T cell function, including an ability to dampen IL-33-augmented CD8+ T cell IFN-γ production. Therefore, in circumstances where IL-33, released as an alarmin, may act on other ST2+ leukocytes and promote disease immunopathology8-11, consumption of IL-33 by ST2+ Treg may be an important regulator of IL-33 associated inflammatory responses. Given the ability of IL-33-exposed DC to selectively expand ST2+ Treg over non-Treg, it is easy to envision the development of IL-33-exposed DC as a means to facilitate Treg expansion to support efforts for their use as regulatory cell therapy to prevent graft-versus-host disease following hematopoietic stem cell transplant or support induction of transplantation tolerance62,63.

This study makes several new observations regarding IL-33, DC, and Treg immunobiology. We identify an unappreciated mechanism of IL-33-mediated immune regulation where ST2+ Treg are expanded through IL-33-driven production of IL-2 by CD11c+ DC. The result of this newly-established IL-33/IL-2 axis in CD11c+ DC is the ability to preferentially expand an activated subset of suppressive Foxp3+ Treg expressing ST2. Finally, our demonstration, both in vitro and in vivo, that IL-33-exposed DC potently and selectively expand ST2+ Treg sets the stage to develop and potentially harness this new knowledge in ongoing experimental and clinical attempts to apply the regulatory capacity of both DC and Treg.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Hongmei Shen and the Starzl Transplant Institute Flow Cytometry Core Facility for their assistance.

1Support was derived from National Institutes of Health grants T32AI074490 (BMM) and R00HL097155 (HRT), a Merck/UNCF Science Initiative Postdoctoral Fellowship (JML), an American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship (BRR), an American Society of Transplantation Basic Science Faculty Development Grant (HRT), and a Roche Organ Transplantation Research Foundation Grant (HRT).

Footnotes

3
Abbreviations used in this paper:
DC
dendritic cell
Foxp3
Forkhead box p3
Treg
regulatory T cell
ST2
IL-33 receptor/IL-1 receptor-like 1
BM
bone marrow
BMT
bone marrow transplant
WT
wild-type
CTV
CellTrace Violet
MFI
mean fluorescence intensity
DT
diphtheria toxin
Flt3L
Flt3 ligand
HMGB1
high mobility group box-1
PD-1
Programmed death-1
PD-L1
Programmed death ligand-1
LAG-3
Lymphocyte activation gene-3
LAP
latency-associated peptide
GARP
Glycoprotein A repetitions predominant

References

  • 1.Pichery M, Mirey E, Mercier P, Lefrancais E, Dujardin A, Ortega N, Girard JP. Endogenous IL-33 is highly expressed in mouse epithelial barrier tissues, lymphoid organs, brain, embryos, and inflamed tissues: in situ analysis using a novel Il-33-LacZ gene trap reporter strain. J Immunol. 2012;188:3488–3495. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schmitz J, Owyang A, Oldham E, Song Y, Murphy E, McClanahan TK, Zurawski G, Moshrefi M, Qin J, Li X, Gorman DM, Bazan JF, Kastelein RA. IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity. 2005;23:479–490. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Licona-Limon P, Kim LK, Palm NW, Flavell RA. TH2, allergy and group 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:536–542. doi: 10.1038/ni.2617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mirchandani AS, Salmond RJ, Liew FY. Interleukin-33 and the function of innate lymphoid cells. Trends Immunol. 2012;33:389–396. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Koyasu S, Moro K. Innate Th2-type immune responses and the natural helper cell, a newly identified lymphocyte population. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;11:109–114. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283448808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu Q, Turnquist HR. Implications for Interleukin-33 in solid organ transplantation. Cytokine. 2013;62:183–194. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liew FY, Pitman NI, McInnes IB. Disease-associated functions of IL-33: the new kid in the IL-1 family. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:103–110. doi: 10.1038/nri2692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kurowska-Stolarska M, Kewin P, Murphy G, Russo RC, Stolarski B, Garcia CC, Komai-Koma M, Pitman N, Li Y, Niedbala W, McKenzie AN, Teixeira MM, Liew FY, Xu D. IL-33 induces antigen-specific IL-5+ T cells and promotes allergic-induced airway inflammation independent of IL-4. J Immunol. 2008;181:4780–4790. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xu D, Jiang HR, Li Y, Pushparaj PN, Kurowska-Stolarska M, Leung BP, Mu R, Tay HK, McKenzie AN, McInnes IB, Melendez AJ, Liew FY. IL-33 exacerbates autoantibody-induced arthritis. J Immunol. 2010;184:2620–2626. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abston ED, Barin JG, Cihakova D, Bucek A, Coronado MJ, Brandt JE, Bedja D, Kim JB, Georgakopoulos D, Gabrielson KL, Mitzner W, Fairweather D. IL-33 independently induces eosinophilic pericarditis and cardiac dilation: ST2 improves cardiac function. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:366–375. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Imai Y, Yasuda K, Sakaguchi Y, Haneda T, Mizutani H, Yoshimoto T, Nakanishi K, Yamanishi K. Skin-specific expression of IL-33 activates group 2 innate lymphoid cells and elicits atopic dermatitis-like inflammation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:13921–13926. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307321110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bourgeois E, Van LP, Samson M, Diem S, Barra A, Roga S, Gombert JM, Schneider E, Dy M, Gourdy P, Girard JP, Herbelin A. The pro-Th2 cytokine IL-33 directly interacts with invariant NKT and NK cells to induce IFN-gamma production. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:1046–1055. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang Q, Li G, Zhu Y, Liu L, Chen E, Turnquist H, Zhang X, Finn OJ, Chen X, Lu B. IL-33 synergizes with TCR and IL-12 signaling to promote the effector function of CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41:3351–3360. doi: 10.1002/eji.201141629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bonilla WV, Frohlich A, Senn K, Kallert S, Fernandez M, Johnson S, Kreutzfeldt M, Hegazy AN, Schrick C, Fallon PG, Klemenz R, Nakae S, Adler H, Merkler D, Lohning M, Pinschewer DD. The alarmin interleukin-33 drives protective antiviral CD8(+) T cell responses. Science. 2012;335:984–989. doi: 10.1126/science.1215418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang HR, Milovanovic M, Allan D, Niedbala W, Besnard AG, Fukada SY, Alves-Filho JC, Togbe D, Goodyear CS, Linington C, Xu D, Lukic ML, Liew FY. IL-33 attenuates EAE by suppressing IL-17 and IFN-gamma production and inducing alternatively activated macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42:1804–1814. doi: 10.1002/eji.201141947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Duan L, Chen J, Zhang H, Yang H, Zhu P, Xiong A, Xia Q, Zheng F, Tan Z, Gong F, Fang M. Interleukin-33 ameliorates experimental colitis through promoting Th2/Foxp3(+) regulatory T-cell responses in mice. Mol Med. 2012;18:753–761. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2011.00428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brunner SM, Schiechl G, Falk W, Schlitt HJ, Geissler EK, Fichtner-Feigl S. Interleukin-33 prolongs allograft survival during chronic cardiac rejection. Transpl Int. 2011;24:1027–1039. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01306.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Turnquist HR, Zhao Z, Rosborough BR, Liu Q, Castellaneta A, Isse K, Wang Z, Lang M, Stolz DB, Zheng XX, Demetris AJ, Liew FY, Wood KJ, Thomson AW. IL-33 expands suppressive CD11b+ Gr-1(int) and regulatory T cells, including ST2L+ Foxp3+ cells, and mediates regulatory T cell-dependent promotion of cardiac allograft survival. J Immunol. 2011;187:4598–4610. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yin H, Li XY, Jin XB, Zhang BB, Gong Q, Yang H, Zheng F, Gong FL, Zhu JY. IL-33 prolongs murine cardiac allograft survival through induction of TH2-type immune deviation. Transplantation. 2010;89:1189–1197. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181d720af. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Turnquist HR, Cardinal J, Macedo C, Rosborough BR, Sumpter TL, Geller DA, Metes D, Thomson AW. mTOR and GSK-3 shape the CD4+ T-cell stimulatory and differentiation capacity of myeloid DCs after exposure to LPS. Blood. 2010;115:4758–4769. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-251488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rank MA, Kobayashi T, Kozaki H, Bartemes KR, Squillace DL, Kita H. IL-33-activated dendritic cells induce an atypical TH2-type response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:1047–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Besnard AG, Togbe D, Guillou N, Erard F, Quesniaux V, Ryffel B. IL-33-activated dendritic cells are critical for allergic airway inflammation. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41:1675–1686. doi: 10.1002/eji.201041033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Darrasse-Jeze G, Deroubaix S, Mouquet H, Victora GD, Eisenreich T, Yao KH, Masilamani RF, Dustin ML, Rudensky A, Liu K, Nussenzweig MC. Feedback control of regulatory T cell homeostasis by dendritic cells in vivo. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1853–1862. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Swee LK, Bosco N, Malissen B, Ceredig R, Rolink A. Expansion of peripheral naturally occurring T regulatory cells by Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand treatment. Blood. 2009;113:6277–6287. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-161026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Townsend MJ, Fallon PG, Matthews DJ, Jolin HE, McKenzie AN. T1/ST2-deficient mice demonstrate the importance of T1/ST2 in developing primary T helper cell type 2 responses. J Exp Med. 2000;191:1069–1076. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.6.1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wan YY, Flavell RA. Identifying Foxp3-expressing suppressor T cells with a bicistronic reporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:5126–5131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501701102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Turnquist HR, Sumpter TL, Tsung A, Zahorchak AF, Nakao A, Nau GJ, Liew FY, Geller DA, Thomson AW. IL-1beta-driven ST2L expression promotes maturation resistance in rapamycin-conditioned dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2008;181:62–72. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rosborough BR, Raich-Regue D, Matta BM, Lee K, Gan B, DePinho RA, Hackstein H, Boothby M, Turnquist HR, Thomson AW. Murine dendritic cell rapamycin-resistant and rictor-independent mTOR controls IL-10, B7-H1, and regulatory T-cell induction. Blood. 2013;121:3619–3630. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-448290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Firan M, Dhillon S, Estess P, Siegelman MH. Suppressor activity and potency among regulatory T cells is discriminated by functionally active CD44. Blood. 2006;107:619–627. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vocanson M, Rozieres A, Hennino A, Poyet G, Gaillard V, Renaudineau S, Achachi A, Benetiere J, Kaiserlian D, Dubois B, Nicolas JF. Inducible costimulator (ICOS) is a marker for highly suppressive antigen-specific T cells sharing features of TH17/TH1 and regulatory T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:280–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.05.022. 289 e281-287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Swee LK, Bosco N, Malissen B, Ceredig R, Rolink A. Expansion of peripheral naturally occurring T regulatory cells by Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand treatment. Blood. 2009;113:6277–6287. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-161026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Darrasse-Jeze G, Deroubaix S, Mouquet H, Victora GD, Eisenreich T, Yao KH, Masilamani RF, Dustin ML, Rudensky A, Liu K, Nussenzweig MC. Feedback control of regulatory T cell homeostasis by dendritic cells in vivo. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1853–1862. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Guo L, Wei G, Zhu J, Liao W, Leonard WJ, Zhao K, Paul W. IL-1 family members and STAT activators induce cytokine production by Th2, Th17, and Th1 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13463–13468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906988106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Granucci F, Vizzardelli C, Pavelka N, Feau S, Persico M, Virzi E, Rescigno M, Moro G, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. Inducible IL-2 production by dendritic cells revealed by global gene expression analysis. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:882–888. doi: 10.1038/ni0901-882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zelante T, Fric J, Wong AY, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. Interleukin-2 production by dendritic cells and its immuno-regulatory functions. Front Immunol. 2012;3:161. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Boyman O, Sprent J. The role of interleukin-2 during homeostasis and activation of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:180–190. doi: 10.1038/nri3156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thornton AM, Donovan EE, Piccirillo CA, Shevach EM. Cutting edge: IL-2 is critically required for the in vitro activation of CD4+CD25+ T cell suppressor function. J Immunol. 2004;172:6519–6523. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.6519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Malek TR. The biology of interleukin-2. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:453–479. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cheng G, Yu A, Malek TR. T-cell tolerance and the multi-functional role of IL-2R signaling in T-regulatory cells. Immunol Rev. 2011;241:63–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01004.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kulhankova K, Rouse T, Nasr ME, Field EH. Dendritic cells control CD4+CD25+ Treg cell suppressor function in vitro through juxtacrine delivery of IL-2. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Moussion C, Ortega N, Girard JP. The IL-1-like cytokine IL-33 is constitutively expressed in the nucleus of endothelial cells and epithelial cells in vivo: a novel 'alarmin'? PLoS One. 2008;3:e3331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kuchler AM, Pollheimer J, Balogh J, Sponheim J, Manley L, Sorensen DR, De Angelis PM, Scott H, Haraldsen G. Nuclear interleukin-33 is generally expressed in resting endothelium but rapidly lost upon angiogenic or proinflammatory activation. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:1229–1242. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Talabot-Ayer D, Calo N, Vigne S, Lamacchia C, Gabay C, Palmer G. The mouse interleukin (Il)33 gene is expressed in a cell type- and stimulus-dependent manner from two alternative promoters. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;91:119–125. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0811425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao WH, Hu ZQ. Up-regulation of IL-33 expression in various types of murine cells by IL-3 and IL-4. Cytokine. 2012;58:267–273. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hazlett LD, McClellan SA, Barrett RP, Huang X, Zhang Y, Wu M, van Rooijen N, Szliter E. IL-33 shifts macrophage polarization, promoting resistance against Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1524–1532. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Polumuri SK, Jayakar GG, Shirey KA, Roberts ZJ, Perkins DJ, Pitha PM, Vogel SN. Transcriptional regulation of murine IL-33 by TLR and non-TLR agonists. J Immunol. 2012;189:50–60. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cayrol C, Girard JP. The IL-1-like cytokine IL-33 is inactivated after maturation by caspase-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9021–9026. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812690106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Haraldsen G, Balogh J, Pollheimer J, Sponheim J, Kuchler AM. Interleukin-33 - cytokine of dual function or novel alarmin? Trends Immunol. 2009;30:227–233. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Oboki K, Ohno T, Kajiwara N, Saito H, Nakae S. IL-33 and IL-33 receptors in host defense and diseases. Allergol Int. 2010;59:143–160. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.10-RAI-0186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chan JK, Roth J, Oppenheim JJ, Tracey KJ, Vogl T, Feldmann M, Horwood N, Nanchahal J. Alarmins: awaiting a clinical response. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2711–2719. doi: 10.1172/JCI62423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li G, Liang X, Lotze MT. HMGB1: The Central Cytokine for All Lymphoid Cells. Front Immunol. 2013;4:68. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yang D, Postnikov YV, Li Y, Tewary P, de la Rosa G, Wei F, Klinman D, Gioannini T, Weiss JP, Furusawa T, Bustin M, Oppenheim JJ. High-mobility group nucleosome-binding protein 1 acts as an alarmin and is critical for lipopolysaccharide-induced immune responses. J Exp Med. 2012;209:157–171. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhong H, Yazdanbakhsh K. Differential control of Helios(+/-) Treg development by monocyte subsets through disparate inflammatory cytokines. Blood. 2013;121:2494–2502. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-11-469122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Granucci F, Feau S, Angeli V, Trottein F, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. Early IL-2 production by mouse dendritic cells is the result of microbial-induced priming. J Immunol. 2003;170:5075–5081. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.10.5075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Andrade MV, Iwaki S, Ropert C, Gazzinelli RT, Cunha-Melo JR, Beaven MA. Amplification of cytokine production through synergistic activation of NFAT and AP-1 following stimulation of mast cells with antigen and IL-33. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41:760–772. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Brint EK, Fitzgerald KA, Smith P, Coyle AJ, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Fallon PG, O'Neill LA. Characterization of signaling pathways activated by the interleukin 1 (IL-1) receptor homologue T1/ST2. A role for Jun N-terminal kinase in IL-4 induction. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:49205–49211. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209685200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Minematsu H, Shin MJ, Celil Aydemir AB, Kim KO, Nizami SA, Chung GJ, Lee FY. Nuclear presence of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) c3 and c4 is required for Toll-like receptor-activated innate inflammatory response of monocytes/macrophages. Cell Signal. 2011;23:1785–1793. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.06.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Guo L, Junttila IS, Paul WE. Cytokine-induced cytokine production by conventional and innate lymphoid cells. Trends Immunol. 2012;33:598–606. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cote-Sierra J, Foucras G, Guo L, Chiodetti L, Young HA, Hu-Li J, Zhu J, Paul WE. Interleukin 2 plays a central role in Th2 differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:3880–3885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400339101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Burchill MA, Yang J, Vogtenhuber C, Blazar BR, Farrar MA. IL-2 receptor beta-dependent STAT5 activation is required for the development of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2007;178:280–290. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.1.280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Burzyn D, Kuswanto W, Kolodin D, Shadrach JL, Cerletti M, Jang Y, Sefik E, Tan TG, Wagers AJ, Benoist C, Mathis D. A special population of regulatory T cells potentiates muscle repair. Cell. 2013;155:1282–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Brunstein CG, Miller JS, Cao Q, McKenna DH, Hippen KL, Curtsinger J, Defor T, Levine BL, June CH, Rubinstein P, McGlave PB, Blazar BR, Wagner JE. Infusion of ex vivo expanded T regulatory cells in adults transplanted with umbilical cord blood: safety profile and detection kinetics. Blood. 2011;117:1061–1070. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-293795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wood KJ, Bushell A, Hester J. Regulatory immune cells in transplantation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:417–430. doi: 10.1038/nri3227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES