Skip to main content
Journal of Medicinal Food logoLink to Journal of Medicinal Food
. 2014 Oct 1;17(10):1103–1112. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2013.0116

Flavonoid Detection in Hydroethanolic Extract of Pouteria torta (Sapotaceae) Leaves by HPLC-DAD and the Determination of Its Mutagenic Activity

Daryne LMG Costa 1,,2, Daniel Rinaldo 3, Eliana A Varanda 4, Juliana F de Sousa 4, Ana LM Nasser 4, Ana CZ Silva 1, Débora C Baldoqui 5, Wagner Vilegas 6, Lourdes Campaner dos Santos 1,
PMCID: PMC4185986  PMID: 25055245

Abstract

It is well known that phytotherapy has grown in popularity in recent years. Because a drug cannot be administered without ensuring its effectiveness and safety, the standardization and regulation of phytotherapeutic drugs are required by the global market and governmental authorities. This article describes a simple and reliable high-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection analysis method for the simultaneous detection of myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside, and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside present in the hydroethanolic extract (ethanol/H2O, 7:3, v/v) of Pouteria torta. The mutagenic activity of the extract was evaluated on Salmonella typhimurium and by an in vivo micronucleus test on the peripheral blood cells of Swiss mice. The linearity, sensitivity, selectivity, repeatability, accuracy, and precision of the assay were evaluated. The analytical curves were linear and exhibited good repeatability (with a deviation of less than 5%) and demonstrated good recovery (within the 83–107% range). The results demonstrate that the hydroethanolic extract exhibited a mutagenic activity in both assays, suggesting caution in the use of this plant in folk medicine.

Key Words: : flavonoids, liquid chromatography, mutagenicity, Pouteria torta, quantification

Introduction

The Sapotaceae family is subdivided into five tribes with 53 genera and ∼1250 species that are mainly found in the tropical and subtropical regions of Asia and South America.1 The genus Pouteria Aublet is a pantropical group consisting of 9 sections and 325 species.2 Many of these species produce high-quality timber and edible fruits, and several species have been used in folk medicine for a variety of ailments.

The biological activity has been attributed to some species of this genus, including antioxidant,3 antibacterial, and antifungal properties.4,5 However, the real potential of this genus as a source of new drugs or phytomedicine remains unknown.

Several Pouteria species have been used in folk medicine to treat fever, inflammation, skin eruptions, ulcers, diabetes,6,7 diarrhea,8 nausea, vomiting, and back pain and to promote lactation in milk feeding mothers.3 However, there is little scientific evidence for most of the purported biological activity.

Triterpenes, such as α- and β-amyrin, α- and β-amyrin acetate, lupeol, lupeol acetate, betulinic and ursolic acid, and flavonoids, such as myricetin, myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside, galic acid, (+)-gallocatechin, (+)-catechin, (−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin-3-O-gallate, and dihydromyricetin, are the main constituents of this genus.6,7,9

Pouteria torta (Mart.) Radlk is a perennial tree that is widespread in the Brazilian Cerrado, popularly called “guapeva,” “curiola,” “acá ferro,” “abiu do cerrado,” and “grão de galo.” The fruit and bark of this tree are used in folk medicine for anti-dysentery purposes.

P. torta branches contain α-amyrin acetate, β-amyrin acetate, betulinic acid, and ursolic acid, which have been isolated through a methanol extract.9 Three flavonoids were identified and isolated from the methanolic extract of P. torta leaves: myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside, and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside.10 Hexane extracts from the leaves contain lupeol acetate.8

Recently, it was reported that the methanol extract of P. torta leaves exhibited an antimicrobial activity against Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.11

One therapeutic approach for treating diabetes involves the inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities to reduce the postprandial blood glucose levels. The P. torta extract exhibited a strong α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity.12

Many plants containing mutagenic compounds have been reported in the literature, such as furocoumarins, tannins, anthraquinones, and flavonoids.13–15 Mutation events are involved in several degenerative diseases, such as cancer and arteriosclerosis.16 Therefore, research on the mutagenicity of medicinal plants is fundamental because the presence of mutagens can be dangerous to human health.

Once flavonoids may act as mutagens at high doses,17 their quantification in plant extracts becomes an important issue. In this study, we report a simple and reliable analytical high-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) method for simultaneous determination of myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside, and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside present in the hydroethanolic extract (ethanol/H2O, 7:3, v/v) of P. torta leaves.

HPLC occupies a very important position in the analysis of flavonoids. Traditional HPLC is most frequently coupled with simple ultraviolet (UV) or DAD, and HPLC-DAD is widely used due to its rapidity, simplicity, and convenience. Several works describe the use of HPLC-DAD to quantify phenolic compounds in plant extracts.18–20

The sensitivity, specificity, linearity, accuracy, and interday precision of the proposed method were evaluated. The efficiency of the analytical procedure was determined by calculating the recovery values. Furthermore, due to the use of these species in folk medicinal treatments, it is important to assess the risk of consuming this plant. Thus, the mutagenic activity of the hydroethanolic extract from leaves of P. torta was evaluated using a Salmonella/microsome assay and the micronucleus test, wherein the peripheral blood cells of mice were treated in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), acetic acid, acetonitrile, and methanol were HPLC grade and purchased from the Tedia Company (Fairfield, OH, USA). The myricetin standard (98% of purity) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Water was purified using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). All solutions prepared for HPLC were filtered through a 0.22-μm GHP filter (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) before use. Myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside were isolated and identified by Rodrigues et al.21 The purity of compounds, as determined by NMR and by HPLC, was found to be higher than 90%. Myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside was isolated and identified from a methanolic extract of P. torta aerial components by Silva et al.10

Plant material

The leaves of P. torta (voucher BOTU 27806) were obtained from the city of Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil and authenticated by Professor Dr. Luiz Fernando Rolim from the Institute of Biosciences, UNESP, Botucatu city, São Paulo State, Brazil. A voucher specimen was deposited at the Herbarium of São Paulo State University (BOTU). The leaves of P. torta were obtained from adult specimens, shadow dried, and stored away from light at room temperature.

Hydroethanolic extract preparation

This study is inserted into a project called Natural Products—Standardization of Phytotherapeutic Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Diseases. In this project, all plants extracts studied must be prepared by percolation at room temperature using a mixture of ethanol:H2O (7:3, v/v). The hydroethanolic extract was prepared by the extraction of dried and powdered P. torta leaves (500 g). The solvents were evaporated to dryness under a low pressure to afford 152 g of crude hydroethanolic extract (30.4%).

Instrumentation

The HPLC system used in this study was a JASCO 2010 HPLC (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with a PU-2089S Plus pump, a MD-2018 Plus Photodiode Array Detector (DAD), an AS-2055 Plus autosampler, and a column oven (CO-2065 plus). The Chrom Nav (Workstation JASCO-Chrom Nav 1.18.03) software was used to control the analytical system and perform the data collection and processing.

High-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-ion trap mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2) was performed on a HPLC coupled to a mass spectrometer LCQ Fleet (Thermo Scientific®, Madison, WI, USA) and equipped with a direct insertion deposition flow injection analyzer. The studied matrix was analyzed by using the ESI technique. The multistage (MS2) and the fragmentation in multiple stages (MS2) were performed at an IT interface. The Xcalibur version 1.3 (Thermo Finigan®, San Jose, CA, USA) software was used to acquire and process data.

Chromatographic conditions

For both HPLC-ESI-IT-MS and HPLC-DAD, liquid chromatography was performed using a Hydro RP18 (25 cm×4.6 mm×5 μm) reversed-phase column protected by a Hydro guard column (2.5 cm×3 mm) from Phenomenex, Inc. (Torrance, CA, USA). The sample injection volume was 20 μL. The signal was monitored at 254 nm. For the HPLC-ESI-IT-MS assay, a binary exploratory gradient elution system was employed, using solvent A (0.1% acetic acid in H2O) and solvent B (0.1% acetic acid in methanol), wherein the amount of solvent B increased linearly from 5% to 100% in 60 min. The flow rate was 0.8 mL min−1.

The elution system used for the HPLC-DAD assay was a binary gradient elution system with solvent A (0.1% TFA in H2O) and solvent B (0.1% TFA in acetonitrile) eluted at an initial linear gradient of 80:20 (A:B), which was changed to 58:42 (A:B) after 30 min. The flow rate was 1.0 mL min−1.

Standard solutions

Myricetin stock solutions were prepared in ethanol at a concentration of 980.0 μg mL−1 in the presence of 0.1% TFA. The stock solutions were stored at 4°C in the dark. The purity of the standard was taken into account when calculating the concentration.

Sample preparation

For the HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2 assay, 1 mg of the hydroethanolic crude extract was dissolved in 1 mL of methanol:H2O (5:95, v/v) in an ultrasonic bath for 5 min. The samples were then filtered through a 0.22-μm GHP filter, and 20-μL aliquots were directly injected into the HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2 system.

For the HPLC-DAD analysis, the hydroethanolic crude extract (60 mg) was dissolved in 2 mL of methanol:H2O (5:95, v/v) using an ultrasonic bath for 5 min. A clean-up step was performed to remove possible contaminants, wherein the solution was purified by solid-phase extraction using Phenomenex Strata C18 cartridges (500 mg of stationary phase). Before analysis, these columns were activated with 5 mL of methanol and equilibrated with 5 mL of methanol:H2O (5:95, v/v). Flavonoids were eluted from cartridges using 3 mL of methanol:H2O (5:95, v/v) to obtain a final volume of 5 mL. The samples were then filtered through a 0.22-μm GHP filter, and aliquots of 20 μL were directly injected into the HPLC.

Identification and quantification

The identification of the flavonoids in the hydroethanolic extract of P. torta leaves was performed by both HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2 and HPLC-DAD employing the conditions described in the Chromatographic Conditions section.

The identification of the compounds by HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2 was mainly performed on the basis of their fragmentation patterns in the MS2 experiments. The negative mode was selected for the generation and analysis of mass spectra for the first order (MS), and the remaining experiments were conducted in multiple stages under the following conditions: capillary voltage of −25 V, voltage spray of −5 kV, capillary temperature of 275°C, nitrogen (N2) carrier gas with a flow rate of 8 arbitrary units (A.U.), helium (He) collision gas, and a track acquisition of 100–2000 m/z. The collision energy for MS/MS was adjusted to 20–25%.

These extracts were also analyzed using HPLC-DAD (λ=254 nm) by coinjecting the pure standards at a 4:1 (extract:standard) ratio to confirm the different flavonoids identified in the chromatographic profile according to their retention times (tR). The UV spectra of these compounds (pure standard×hydroethanolic extract) were compared and the indices of spectral similarity were calculated using the EZChrom Elite 3.1.7 software. Finally, HPLC-DAD was employed to quantify each identified flavonoid.

The method of external standard was applied to quantify each compound. Quantification of analytes was performed using a regression curve, each point in triplicate.

The amount of analytes in the sample was determined by measuring the peak areas and comparing them with those obtained for the reference myricetin standard solution. The myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside, and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside identified in the samples were quantified using the myricetin calibration curves. This analysis could be performed because the electronic UV spectra of the standards are practically superimposable with those of the analyzed substances at the monitored wavelength.

Mutagenicity assays

Salmonella microsome assay

The mutagenic activity was evaluated using the Salmonella/microsome assay with Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA100, TA97a, and TA102, which were kindly provided by Dr. B.N. Ames (Berkeley, CA, USA). The assay was performed in the presence and absence of metabolization by the preincubation method.22 The strains were grown from frozen cultures overnight for 12–14 h in the Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2. The S9 fraction, prepared from the livers of Sprague Dawley rats treated with the polychlorinated biphenyl mixture Aroclor 1254, was purchased from Molecular Toxicology, Inc. (Boone, NC, USA). The metabolic activation system consisted of 4% of the S9 fraction, 1% of 0.4 M MgCl2, 1% of 1.65 M KCl, 0.5% of 1 M D-glucose-6-phosphate disodium, 4% of 0.1 M NADP, 50% of 0.2 M phosphate buffer, and 39.5% of sterile distilled water. The metabolic activation mixture (S9) was freshly prepared before each test. Five different doses of test extract were diluted in DMSO, the concentrations of which were selected based on a preliminary toxicity test. In all subsequent assays, the upper limit of the dose range was either the highest nontoxic dose or the lowest toxic dose determined in the preliminary assay. The toxicity was apparent either as a reduction in the number of His+ revertants or as an alteration in the auxotrophic background (i.e., the background lawn). Various concentrations (0.62, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 mg/plate) of hydroethanolic extract were added to 0.5 mL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) or 0.5 mL of a 4% S9 mixture with 0.1 mL of bacterial culture and then incubated at 37°C for 20–30 min. Subsequently, 2 mL of top agar was added to the mixture and poured onto a plate containing minimal agar. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and the His+ revertant colonies were counted manually. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The results were analyzed using the Salanal statistical software package (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, NV, USA; version 1.0, from Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) and adopting the Bernstein et al. model.23 The data (revertants/plate) were assessed by performing an analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a linear regression. The mutagenic index (MI) was calculated for each concentration as an average number of revertants per plate, and this value was compared with that of a test compound divided by the average number of revertants per plate with a negative (solvent) control. A sample was considered mutagenic when a dose–response relationship was detected and a twofold increase in the number of mutants (MI ≥2) was observed for at least one concentration.24 The standard mutagens used as positive controls in experiments in the absence of the S9 mix were 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (10 μg/plate) for TA98 and TA97a, sodium azide (2.5 μg/plate) for TA100, and mitomycin (0.5 μg/plate) for TA102. 2-Anthramine (1.25 μg/plate) was used with TA98, TA97a, and TA100, whereas 2-aminofluorene (10 μg/plate) was used with TA102 in the experiments with metabolic activation. DMSO served as the negative (solvent) control (75 μL/plate).

Micronucleus assay of peripheral blood cells

To perform the micronucleus assay, blood samples from 5- to 6-week-old albino Swiss mice (Mus musculus) weighing ∼30 g from the Central Animal Facility of the São Paulo State University (São Paulo, Brazil) were used. Each animal was kept in a single polypropylene cage, according to the conditions for animal care recommended by the Canadian Council on Animal Care.25 All the procedures were approved by the Ethics Research Committee of the São Paulo State University in Araraquara (UNESP, SP, Brazil - process number 22/2010). The mice were divided into five groups of 10 animals (5 males and 5 females) for the evaluation of the hydroethanolic extract: a negative control group that received distilled water; a positive control group treated with cyclophosphamide (50 mg kg−1 body weight [b.w.]); and the three groups that received the extract. The extract was assessed at three different doses: 15.0, 11.2, and 7.5 mg kg−1 b.w. These doses were based on the solubility limit of the extract in distilled water. In addition, the doses tested in this study were not toxic to the animals. Each animal in these groups was treated with 0.1 mL of each test solution per 10 g of body weight. The animals received water and food ad libitum between the treatment and the blood sampling. The treatments with plant extract and distilled water (negative control) were performed through gavage. The treatment with cyclophosphamide was performed intraperitoneally. The micronucleus test on the peripheral blood cells was conducted according to the method of Hayashi et al.26 using slides that were prestained with acridine orange. The staining was performed by heating glass slides to 70°C on a hot-plate and then adding an aqueous solution of the dye (10 μL, 1 mg mL−1) to each slide. The solution was then spread evenly over the surface with one end of another clean slide. After drying, the slides were kept in the dark at room temperature for at least 24 h. Blood samples were obtained from the tail veins of mice before treatment (T0) and 30 h (T1) after treatment by perforating the caudal vein of the mouse with a needle and collecting 5 μL aliquots of blood. Each aliquot was placed in the center of a slide prestained with acridine orange and covered with a coverslip (24×60 mm). These slides were then maintained in the dark at −20°C for a minimum of 24 h before performing the cytological examination of the blood cells. The cell preparations were examined under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon) with a blue (488 nm) excitation filter and yellow (515 nm) emission (barrier) filter using an immersion objective. Reticulocytes (2000 per treated animal) were analyzed and the proportion of micronucleated cells was determined. The results were analyzed using parametric (ANOVA/Tukey) or nonparametric tests (Kruskal–Wallis/Dunn's post hoc), according to the nature of the data distribution.

Results and Discussion

Identification and quantification

Figure 1 shows the chromatogram of the hydroethanolic extract from P. torta leaves by HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2. Peak 1 (Rt 27.23 min, Fig. 1) reveals the signal for the deprotonated molecule [M-H] with a m/z 479, peak 2 (Rt 28.56 min, Fig. 1) has a m/z 449, and peak 3 (Rt 28.86 min, Fig. 1) has a m/z 463. The second order fragmentation (MS/MS) of the most representative ions led to the identification of secondary metabolites, which confirmed the presence of O-glycoside flavonoids (Fig. 2 and Table 1). In the second order fragmentation pattern, a signal for the deprotonated molecule [M-H-162] is observed with a m/z 317 for peak 1, suggesting the loss of a hexose. Similarly, peak 2 contains the signal for a deprotonated molecule [M-H-132] at m/z 317 suggesting the loss of a pentose. Second order fragmentation generated the ion at m/z 317 [M-H-146] in peak 3 suggesting the loss of a deoxyhexose.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Negative ion HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2 analysis of hydroethanolic extract of P. torta leaves. Total ion chromatogram (a); extracted ion chromatograms for m/z 479 (b); m/z 449 (c); and m/z 463 (d). HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2, high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-ion trap mass spectrometry.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

MS2 spectra of (a) m/z 479 at tR=27.23 min corresponding to myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside; (b) m/z 449 at tR=28.56 min corresponding to myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside; and (c) m/z 463 at tR=28.86 min corresponding to myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside.

Table 1.

Flavonoids Identified in P. torta Leaf Hydroethanolic Extract by HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2

Peak tR (min) [M-H] Product ion scan fragments of [M-H] Compound
1 27.23 479 317 [M-162-H] Myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside
      316 [M-162-H]−•  
2 28.56 449 317 [M-132-H] Myricetin-3-O-α-D-arabinopyranoside.
      316 [M-162-H]−•  
3 28.86 463 317 [M-146-H] Myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside
      316 [M-162-H]−•  

HPLC-ESI-IT-MS2, high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-ion trap mass spectrometry.

All MS2 spectra obtained for the O-glycoside flavonoids (Fig. 2) reveal a signal with a m/z 316. This signal can be a attributed to the radical aglycone ions [M-162-H]−•, [M-146-H]−•, and [M-132-H]−• besides the regulars [M-162-H], [M-146-H], and [M-132-H] ion, corresponding to the deprotonated aglycones. The [M-162-H]−•, [M-146-H]−•, and [M-132-H]−• ions are formed by a hemolytic cleavage of the glycoside bond.27 According to Cuyckens and Claeys,27 the radical aglycone ion:deprotonated aglycone ion ratio suggests a certain glycosylation position; this is especially the case for flavonol 3-O-glycosides where this ratio is very high. A number of preliminary HPLC experiments employing samples were performed to establish the optimal conditions for the analysis of myricetin, myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside, and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside, structures of which can be seen in Figure 3.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Chemical structures of the flavonoids. Myricetin (R=OH); myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside (R=O-gal); myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside (R=O-ara); and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside (R=O-rha).

The identification of flavonoids from the hydroethanolic extract from the leaves of P. torta was performed as described in the Identification and Quantification section.

The indices of spectral similarity between the UV spectra of the flavonoid standards and those of the chromatographic profile were within the 0.9999 and 1.0000 range (Table 2).

Table 2.

Indices of Spectral Similarity Between the UltraViolet Spectra of the Flavonoid Standards and Those of the Chromatographic Profile Obtained by HPLC-DAD

Standard Peak Similarity index
myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside tR=5.89 min 1.0000
myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside tR=6.89 min 0.9999
myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside tR=7.20 min 1.0000

DAD, diode array detection.

As shown in Figure 4, the HPLC-DAD analysis provided excellent separation of the compounds of interest, which could be analyzed in a satisfactory amount of time (myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, Rt=5.89 min, myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside, Rt=6.89 min, and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside, Rt=7.20 min). Under the optimized sample preparation conditions, the intervals at which the compounds were eluted were free of interference in all tested samples.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

HPLC-DAD profiles obtained from the hydroethanolic extract of the leaves of P. torta employing the conditions described in the Chromatographic Conditions section. The chromatograms were recorded using the timed wavelength program registered at 254 nm. (a) Refers to the crude extract, while (b), (c), and (d) were spiked with myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside (1), myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside (2), and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside (3), respectively. DAD, diode array detection.

The results of the quantification assay are provided in Table 3.

Table 3.

Content of Myricetin Heterosides in Hydroethanolic Extract of P. torta

Analytes (mg g−1)a±RSD%
Miricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside 2.7±0.6
Miricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside 1.4±1.8
Miricetin-3-O-α-D-arabinopyranoside 2.1±2.8
a

The concentration data of flavonoids are shown as means (n=3) in mg of flavonoid per gram of hydroethanolic crude extract.

RSD, relative standard deviation.

Linearity and sensitivity

The linearity of the DAD detector was investigated at the λ=254 nm for myricetin by selecting the calibration range according to the amount of the flavonoid analytes in the samples. The experimental results for the curves were analyzed using the Huber Test to reject anomalous results; by using k=1, three of the seven available curves were rejected to achieve a correlation coefficient (R2) of less than 0.9993. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.81 μg mL−1 and 2.44 μg mL−1, respectively. The linear range was within 15.63–125.0 μg mL−1. Three injections were made for each solution, and the peak area (response, y) of the analyte was plotted as a function of the concentration (c) in μg ml−1 to obtain a calibration curve with four data points (15.63, 31.25, 62.5, and 125 μg mL−1; y=52550–217866.47c).

Selectivity

Selectivity was evaluated by comparing the Rt of each standard reference compound with that of the peaks obtained by analyzing the P. torta extract. Further confirmation of peak identities was obtained by performing spiking experiments (Fig. 4) and comparing the results with the recorded UV spectra (Fig. 4 and Table 2).

Repeatability and precision

The interday and intraday precision of the Rt was determined with five injections of the sample on 3 different days. The interday variation was 5%, whereas the intraday variation was between 1.0 and 3.0% for one of the three flavonoids.

Accuracy

The accuracy of the method was investigated by performing recovery studies. Recovery was calculated by comparing the amount of flavonoids in standard solutions subjected to the extraction procedure described in the Sample Preparation section and the amount of flavonoids in standard solutions that were not subjected to the extraction procedure. Three sample replicates were prepared for each case, and percentage of recovery was calculated for each flavonoid. The recovery values were 90%, 107%, and 83% for myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside, and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside, respectively.

Mutagenicity assays

In Table 4, the mutagenic activity was evaluated using the Ames test. The crude hydroethanolic extract was mutagenic to the TA97a and TA98 strains in the absence of metabolization, inducing a significant increase in the frequency of revertants per plate. Following metabolic activation with S9, the mutagenic effect was not observed. Therefore, these results reveal that the compounds present in the extract cause a frameshift-type mutation, which directly affects the DNA. The data in Table 4 indicate that following the metabolic activation, compounds that cause mutations in the TA98 and TA97a strains lose their activity. In Table 4, it was also observed that the highest nontoxic dose for TA98 strain (−S9) is 5.0 mg/plate. The highest dose used (7.5 mg/plate) has lower MI than the dose of 5.0 mg/plate in TA98 (−S9) indicating signs of cytotoxicity. For the TA100 and TA102 strains, the mutagenic effect was not observed.

Table 4.

Mutagenic Activity Expressed as the Mean and Standard Deviation of the Number of Revertants/Plate and the Mutagenic Index in Bacterial Strains TA98, TA100, TA97a, and TA102 Exposed to the Hydroethanolic Extract of P. torta, at Various Doses, With (+S9) or Without (−S9) Metabolic Activation

  Number of revertants His+/plate in S. typhimurium (MI)
  TA98 TA100 TA97a TA102
Treatments (mg/plate) −S9 +S9 −S9 +S9 −S9 +S9 −S9 +S9
DMSO 18±7 30±5 142±6 201±14 150±6 170±12 121±13 241±14
0.62 19±2 (1.0) 24±3 (0.8) 147±7 (1.0) 197±20 (0.9) 159±25 (1.0) 155±11 (0.9) 136±18 (1.1) 266±15 (1.1)
1.25 28±4 (1.5) 28±5 (0.9) 180±26 (1.3) 193±26 (0.9) 181±12 (1.2) 181±12 (1.0) 128±8 (1.0) 261±17 (1.0)
2.5 32±5 (1.7) 22±2 (0.7) 228±37 (1.6) 201±8 (1.0) 208±14 (1.4) 153±19 (0.9) 118±15 (1.0) 258±10 (1.0)
5.0 49±1** (2.7) 22±3 (0.7) 218±14 (1.5) 198±4 (0.9) 344±30** (2.3) 193±23 (1.1) 129±6 (1.1) 247±16 (1.0)
7.5 25±4 (1.3) 22±5 (0.7) 155±26 (1.0) 176±15 (0.8) 363±30** (2.4) 199±26 (1.1) 131±7 (1.1) 232±22 (0.9)
Control+ 492±69a 540±51b 1629±332c 2119±413b 1255±291a 1330±70b 835±22d 969±57e

DMSO, 75 μL/plate; control+ : positive control.

a

4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (10.0 μg/plate).

b

2-Anthramine (1.25 μg/plate).

c

Sodium azide (2.5 μg/plate).

d

Mitomycin (0.5 μg/plate).

e

2-aminofluorene (10.0 μg/plate).

**

P≤.01 analysis of variance.

MI, mutagenic index.

Because the in vitro Ames test did not completely represent the conditions found in a more complex in vivo system, we evaluated the mutagenic potential of the hydroethanolic extract in vivo.

In vivo micronucleus tests were performed on albino Swiss mice, which were treated with three different doses of the extract using a gavage. As shown in Table 5, all tested doses induced a significant proliferation of micronuclei after the acute treatment, which confirmed the mutagenic potential of the extract. This result indicates that compounds present in the hydroethanolic extract of P. torta may cause breaks in the DNA or aneugenesis. In this manner, these results confirm the in vitro assay results, which also indicated mutagenicity.

Table 5.

Micronucleated Reticulocytes Number, per 2000 Analyzed Cells, 30 H After the Acute Treatment with the Different Doses of the Hydroethanolic Extract of P. torta

  Control T0 30 h
Treatments Number of animals MNRETs x±SD/animal Number of animals MNRETs SD/animal x±SD/animal
Water 10 20 2.0±1.36 10 21 2.1±1.27
Cyclophosphamide 10 14 1.4±1.22 10 988 98.8±3.74*
Extract of P. torta (mg kg−1 b.w.)
 15.0 10 14 1.4±0.88 10 111 11.10±2.9*
 11.2 10 17 1.7±1.20 10 88 8.78±1.41*
 7.5 10 13 1.3±0.60 10 72 7.20±2.68*

Positive control: cyclophosphamide-50 mg kg−1 b.w.; negative control: water.

*

Statistically different of the negative control. (P<.001).

b.w., body weight; MNRET, micronucleated reticulocytes; SD, standard deviation.

Therefore, we used in vitro (Ames test) and in vivo (micronucleus test) assays to evaluate the genotoxic properties of extract from the leaves of P. torta and both assays are considered to be effective tests for this kind of evaluation.28,29

Ames30 pointed out that many elements found in the human diet could have noxious effects. Other studies have demonstrated that natural products can represent serious risks to the DNA integrity of different organisms.31,32

The methodology employed herein affirms that the extract of P. torta is mutagenic in vivo and in vitro in the absence of metabolic activation. The in vivo test would reflect the metabolism of the active constituents and the metabolization is more complex. However, the micronucleus assay identifies agents that cause DNA breaks (clastogenesis) or mitotic fails that result in chromosome loss (aneugenesis), and the S. typhimurium assay identifies agents that cause point mutations.

The phytochemical analysis of P. torta reveals the presence of α-amyrin acetate, β-amyrin acetate, betulinic acid, ursolic acid, and lupeol acetate.8,9 In addition, this work has demonstrated the presence of myricetin glycosides in P. torta.

Myricetin exhibits a more pronounced mutagenic activity than quercetin.33 Even though it has the same molecular characteristics as quercetin, the addition of a sixth hydroxyl on the 5′ carbon of the B ring results in a higher reactivity. Myricetin is a flavonol found in a wide variety of edible plants and although it has been proven to be genotoxic to bacteria and can induce a significant concentration-dependent nuclear DNA degradation concurrent with lipid peroxidation, very little is known about the mechanisms of its genotoxicity.34

Myricetin derivatives were identified in extracts of P. torta leaves. These secondary metabolites are flavonols, which are the most abundant subclass of flavonoids. Rietjens et al.15 reported that the mutagenic activity of flavonols is related to its quinone/quinone methide chemistry and is dependent on specific structural features. Based on these requirements, a metabolic pathway for the flavonol activation of DNA-reactive species was proposed, which included an enzymatic and/or chemical oxidation to O-quinone, followed by isomerization of the O-quinone to quinone methides. These quinone methides are expected to be the active alkylating DNA-reactive intermediates. Thus, it appears that flavonols present in P. torta leaves contribute to the induced mutations.

These types of mutation events may represent serious risks to human health. Mutations are involved in the initial steps of degenerative diseases, such as cancer. Thus, the results reported herein underline the risks of indiscriminate use of natural compounds and the importance of research on the mutagenicity of compounds obtained from plants, especially those used in popular medicines or foods.

In conclusion, a simple method was developed for the simultaneous determination of myricetin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside, and myricetin-3-O-α-L-rhaminopyranoside, which did not require tedious procedures to eliminate interfering materials and can be used to standardize the polar extracts of P. torta. The method is sensitive enough for the analysis of the three myricetin derivatives, with adequate limits of quantification, as defined by the Eurachem and ANVISA (Brazil) Legislation. Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision were obtained for the three myricetin heterosides. In addition, good results were obtained with respect to repeatability (a relative standard deviation of <5%) and recovery (90%, 83%, and 107%).

Based on the results presented in this article, we also conclude that the compounds present in the extract cause frameshift mutations in vitro (Ames assay) as well as breaks in and/or loss of entire chromosomes in vivo (micronucleus assay). The likely mutagenic agent that contributes to this activity are myricetin derivatives, which is present in P. torta.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for financial aid to L.C.S. and W.V. They also thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for grants to L.C.S., E.A.V., and W.V.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Swenson U, Anderberg AA: Phylogeny, character evolution, and classification of Sapotaceae (Ericales). Cladistics 2005;21:101–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Triono T, Brown AHD, West JG, Crisp MD: A phylogeny of Pouteria (Sapotaceae) from Malesia and Australasia. Aust Syst Bot 2007;20:107–118 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Manosroi A, Saraphanchotiwitthaya A, Manosroi J: In vitro immunomodulatory effect of Pouteria cambodiana (Pierre ex Dubard) Baehni extract. J Ethnopharmacol 2005;101:90–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Agripino DG, Lima MEL, Silva MR, Meda CI, Bolzani VS, Cordeiro I, Young MCM, Moreno PRH: Screening of Brazilian plants for antimicrobial and DNA-damaging activities. I. Atlantic rain forest-ecological station juréia-itatins. Biota Neotrop 2004;4:1–15 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boleti AP, Freire MG, Coelho MB, Silva W, Baldasso PA, Gomes VM, Marangoni S, Novello JC, Macedo ML: Insecticidal and antifungal activity of a protein from Pouteria torta seeds with lectin-like properties. J Agric Food Chem 2007;55:2653–2658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ma J, Yang H, Basile MJ, Kennelly EJ: Analysis of polyphenolic antioxidants from the fruits of three Pouteria species by selected ion monitoring liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 2004;52:5873–5878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Montenegro LHM, Oliveira PES, Conserva LM, Rocham EMM, Brito AC, Araújo RM, Trevisan MTS, Lemos RPL: Triterpenóides e avaliação do potencial antimalárico, larvicida, anti-radicalar e anticolinesterástico de Pouteria venosa L (Sapotaceae). Rev Bras Farmacogn 2006;16:611–617 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Perfeito JP, Santos ML, Lopez KSE, Paula JE, Silveira D: Characterization and biological properties of Pouteria torta extracts: a preliminary study. Rev Bras Farmacogn 2005;15:183–186 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Che CT, Koike K, Cordell GA, Fong HHS, Dobbehstetn RH: Triterpenes of Pouteria torta (Sapotaceae). J Nat Prod (Lloydia) 2005;43:420–421 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Silva ACZ, Vilegas W, Nasser ALM, Stefanini M: Isolamento e Identificação de Flavonóides em Pouteria torta. Presented at XXI Congresso de Iniciação Científica da UNESP Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil, November, 3–7, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alves TMA, Silva AF, Brandão MGL, Grandi TSM, Smânia EF, Zani CL: Biological screening of Brazilian medicinal plants. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2000;95:367–373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Souza PM, Sales PM, Simeoni LA, Silva EC, Silveira D, Magalhães PO: Inhibitory activity of α-amylase and α-glucosidase by plant extracts from the Brazilian Cerrado. Planta Med 2012;78:393–399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Varanda EA, Pozetti GL, Lourenço MV, Vilegas W, Raddi MSG: Genotoxicity of Brosimum gaudichaudii measured by the Salmonella/microsome assay and chromosomal aberrations in CHO cells. J Ethnopharmacol 2002;81:257–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ferreira ICDF, Vargas VMF: Mutagenicity of medicinal plant extracts in Salmonella/microsome assay. Phytother Res 1999;13:397–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rietjens IMCM, Boersma MG, Woude H, Jeurissen SMF, Schutte ME, Alink GM: Flavonoids and alkenylbenzenes: mechanisms of mutagenic action and carcinogenic risk. Mutat Res 2005;574:124–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.De Flora S: Mechanisms of inhibitors of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Mutat Res 1998;402:151–158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Skibola CF, Smith MT: Potencial health impacts of excessive flavonoid intake. Free Radic Biol Med 2000;29:375–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Irakli MN, Samanidou VF, Biliaderis CG, Papadoyannis IN: Simultaneous determination of phenolic acids and flavonoids in rice using solid-phase extraction and RP-HPLC with photodiode array detection. J Sep Sci 2012;35:1603–1611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saldanha LL, Vilegas W, Dokkedal AL: Characterization of flavonoids and phenolic acids in Myrcia bella Cambess. Using FIA-ESI-IT-MSn and HPLC-PAD-ESI-IT-MS combined with NMR. Molecules 2013;18:8402–8416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zehl M, Braunberger C, Conrad J, Crnogorac M, Krasteva S, Vogler B, Beifuss U, Krenn L: Identification and quantification of flavonoids and ellagic acid derivatives in therapeutically important Drosera species by LC–DAD, LC–NMR, NMR, and LC–MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 2011;400:2565–2576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rodrigues CL, Rinaldo D, Sannomiya M, Santos LC, Montoro P, Piacente S, Vilegas W: High-performance liquid chromatographic separation and identification of polyphenolic compounds from the infusion of Davilla elliptica St. Hill. Phytochem Anal 2008;19:17–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maron DM, Ames BN: Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 1983;113:173–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bernstein L, Kaldor J, McCann J, Pike MC: An empirical approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenesis data from the Salmonella test. Mutat Res 1982;97:267–281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Santos FV, Colus IMS, Silva MA, Vilegas W, Varanda EA: Assessment of DNA damage induced by extracts and fractions of Strychnos pseudoquina, a Brazilian medicinal plant with antiulcerogenic activity. Food Chem Toxicol 2006;44:1585–1589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Olfert ED, Cross BM, Mcwillan AA: The Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Toronto, Canada, 1993 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hayashi M, Morita T, Kodama Y, Sofuni T, Ishidate MJR: The micronucleus assay with mouse peripheral blood reticulocytes using acridine orange-coated slides. Mutat Res 1990;245:245–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cuyckens F, Claeys M: Determination of the glycosylation site in flavonoid mono-O-glycosides by collision-induced dissociation of electrospray-generated deprotonated and sodiated molecules. J Mass Spectrom 2005;40:364–372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mortelmans K, Zeiger E: The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutat Res 2000;455:29–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Krishna G, Hayashi M: In vivo rodent micronucleus assay: protocol, conduct and data interpretation. Mutat Res 2000;455:155–166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ames BN: Dietary carcinogens and anticarcinogens. Science 1983;221:1256–1264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Santos FV, Calvo TR, Colus IMS, Vilegas W, Varanda EA: Mutagenicity of two species of the genus Alchornea measured by Salmonella microsome assay and micronucleus test. Rev Bras Farmacogn 2010;20:382–389 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Resende FA, Vilegas W, Santos LC, Varanda EA: Mutagenicity of flavonoids assayed by bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test. Molecules 2012;17:5255–5268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yoshino M, Haneda M, Naruse M, Murakami K: Prooxidant activity of flavonoids: copper-dependent strand breaks and the formation of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in DNA. Mol Genet Metab 1999;68:468–472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Silva ID, Gaspar J, Rodrigues A, Costa GG, Laires A, Rueff J: Mechanisms of myricetin mutagenicity in V79 cells: involvement of radicalar species. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 1996;16:253–268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medicinal Food are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES