Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications
. 2014 Sep 25;70(Pt 10):1368–1371. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X14017981

Expression, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of cystathionine β-lyase from Acinetobacter baumannii OXA-23

Diem-Quynh Nguyen a,, Ho-Phuong-Thuy Ngo a,, Yeh-Jin Ahn b, Sang Hee Lee c, Lin-Woo Kang a,*
PMCID: PMC4188081  PMID: 25286941

Cystathionine β-lyase from multidrug-resistant A. baumannii OXA-23 (AbCBL), an enzyme involved in the methionine-metabolism pathway and a novel antibacterial drug target, was cloned, expressed, purified and crystallized. Preliminary X-ray crystallography was performed to analyse the AbCBL crystal.

Keywords: cystathionine β-lyase, PLP-dependent enzyme, multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Abstract

Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) has emerged as a leading nosocomial pathogen because of its resistance to most currently available antibiotics. Cystathionine β-lyase (CBL), a pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzyme, catalyzes the second step in the transsulfuration pathway, which is essential for the metabolic interconversion of the sulfur-containing amino acids homocysteine and methionine. The enzymes of the transsulfuration pathway are considered to be attractive drug targets owing to their specificity to microbes and plants. As a potential target for the development of novel antibacterial drugs, the AbCBL protein was expressed, purified and crystallized. An AbCBL crystal diffracted to 1.57 Å resolution and belonged to the trigonal space group P3112, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 102.9, c = 136.5 Å. The asymmetric unit contained two monomers, with a corresponding V M of 2.3 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 46.9%.

1. Introduction  

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) causes nosocomial infections such as pneumonia, bacteraemia, urinary-tract infections and surgical infections in approximately 50% of patients admitted to intensive-care units (Roca et al., 2012). Ab shows resistance to many classes of antibiotics, including β-lactams, aminoglycosides, quinolones, tetracyclines and polymyxins (Perez et al., 2007). Owing to its multiple drug resistance, Ab is an emerging nosocomial pathogen, with reported outbreaks in several countries around the world (Peleg et al., 2008). In order to discover new treatments for MDR Ab, enzymes that are essential for its growth or survival have been chosen as drug targets. Two of these enzymes have previously been reported (Huynh et al., 2014; Nguyen et al., 2013). Cystathionine β-lyase from Ab (AbCBL) is another drug target and is currently enzymatically and structurally uncharacterized.

Cystathionine β-lyase (CBL; EC 4.4.1.8) is a pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the second step of the transsulfuration pathway, in which cystathionine is converted into homocysteine, thereby producing pyruvate and ammonia as side products during a β-elimination reaction. The transsulfuration pathway includes cystathionine γ-synthase (CGS), cystathionine β-lyase (CBL), cystathionine γ-lyase (CGL) and cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) enzymes. CGS and CBL belong to the forward direction of the transsulfuration pathway, which is specific to microbes and plants and does not exist in humans, while CBS and CGL belong to the reverse direction of the transsulfuration pathway, which exists in bacteria, fungi and mammals (Steegborn & Clausen, 2000). The lack of CGS and CBL in humans makes these enzymes attractive drug targets. CBL evolved from the same ancestor protein and is structurally related to CGS, an enzyme that catalyzes the first step of the transsulfuration pathway, in which cystathionine is formed from homoserine and cysteine (Belfaiza et al., 1986; Clausen et al., 1998; Steegborn et al., 1999). To date, structures of Escherichia coli CBL (Clausen et al., 1996), Arabidopsis thaliana CBL (Breitinger et al., 2001), E. coli CGS (Clausen et al., 1998), Nicotiana tabacum CGS (Steegborn et al., 1999), Mycobacterium ulcerans CGS (Clifton et al., 2011) and Heclicobacter pylori CGS (PDB entry 4l0o; K. F. Tarique, S. A. A. Rehman, E. Ahmed & S. Gourinath, unpublished work) have been solved and their sequences share 29, 25, 26, 28, 25 and 30% sequence identity with AbCBL. All of them exist as homotetramers formed by monomers related by a crystallographic twofold axis.

Previous reports have demonstrated that CBL is necessary for virulence in Salmonella enterica and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Ejim et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2008). We set out to determine the crystal structure of AbCBL as a potential drug target. In this study, we report the cloning, expression, crystallization and preliminary diffraction analysis of CBL from MDR Ab. With this study, we hope to offer guidelines for future investigations into the catalytic role of this enzyme, which could facilitate the development of novel antibacterial drugs against MDR Ab.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Macromolecule production  

The genomic DNA for carbapenem-resistant Ab OXA-23 (Espinal et al., 2013) was isolated from a urine specimen from a patient hospitalized in Busan, Republic of Korea and was used as template for amplifying the AbCBL coding sequence of cystathionine-β-lyase by PCR (Table 1). The PCR reaction was performed using amfiECOPCR Premix (GenDEPOT, USA). Amplified DNA fragments were purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany), double-digested with BamHI and XhoI, cloned into pETDuet-1 vector (Novagen) containing a 6×His tag at the N-terminus and finally transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells.

Table 1. Macromolecule-production information.

Source organism A. baumannii OXA-23
DNA source Genomic DNA
Forward primer 5-CCCCCGGATCCCATGAAAAAGCATAACAATTTC-3
Reverse primer 5-CCCCCCCTCGAGTTACATTTGTTTCAAAGCATT-3
Cloning vector pETDuet-1 vector (Novagen)
Expression vector pETDuet-1 vector (Novagen)
Expression host E. coli BL21 (DE3)
Complete amino-acid sequence of the construct produced MGSSHHHHHHSGAPMKKHNNFQTQLIHAPRKAPQFIETVQPPLFRASTIIFKSTSHLFDRHWTDPYDYSYGTHGTPTTFTLGDNIAQVEGGLYCLLAPSGLSAINLVNSAVLATGDEVWVPDNIYGPNLEHLNYLKDQYGINVQVYNPIDVSSFQPSDKTKLLWLEAAGSVTLEFPDLKALVKKAKAHGVLTALDNTWGAGLAFNAFDFSDEHLSVDLTIHALTKYPSGGGDILMGSVVTRDEKLHHRLFRMHAILGISVSGDDTAQIQRSLAHMSLRYEQQSNNAKTLLTWLKEQPQFAQVLHPSDKAAPGHQYWQEICSTGKSAGLVSVVFKSDYDISAVRRFCDALKLFKIGFSWGGPVSLVMLYDLKMMRKLENTHLQQGLLVRFCIGLEDPQDLIQDIENALKQM

BamHI and XhoI restriction sites are underlined.

E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells harbouring pETDuet1-AbCBL were grown at 310 K in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium containing 50 µg ml−1 ampicillin until they reached an OD600 of 0.6. Protein expression was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalacto­pyranoside (IPTG). The cell pellet was collected by centrifugation at 3000g for 30 min at 277 K (Hanil Supra 30K A1000S-4 rotor), resuspended in ice-cold lysis buffer [25 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 15 mM imidazole, 10%(v/v) glycerol, 3 mM β-mercapto­ethanol] and homogenized by ultrasonication on ice (Sonomasher). The crude cell extract was centrifuged for 45 min at 19 960g (Hanil) and 277 K to remove cell debris. The supernatant was applied onto Ni–NTA His-Bind resin (Novagen) and affinity purification was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol at 277 K. The column was washed with buffer B consisting of 25 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 1 M NaCl, 25 mM imidazole. The AbCBL was then eluted using buffer C consisting of 25 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole. The eluted AbCBL was further purified using a HiTrap Q ion-exchange column (GE Healthcare) at 277 K with a 90 ml linear gradient of 0.0–1.0 M NaCl in a buffer consisting of 25 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 10%(v/v) glycerol at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1. The AbCBL protein eluted at 280 mM NaCl. Approximately 40 mg of AbCBL was purified from 2 l of cell culture.

2.2. Crystallization  

For crystallization, the protein solution was concentrated using Amicon spin concentrators (10 kDa cutoff, Millipore) to achieve a final concentration of 10 mg ml−1 in a buffer consisting of 25 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 30 mM NaCl, 10%(v/v) glycerol. Initial crystallization was carried out at 287 K by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method in 96-well Intelli-Plates (Art Robbins) using a Hydra II e-drop automated pipetting system (Matrix) and screening kits from Hampton Research (Index, Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen Cryo, Crystal Screen Lite, PEG/Ion and PEG/Ion 2) and Emerald Bio (Wizard Classic 1 and 2 and Wizard Precipitant Synergy). 0.5 µl protein solution was mixed with 0.5 µl reservoir solution and subsequently equilibrated against 70 µl reservoir solution. AbCBL crystals of various shapes (small sphere-shaped, droplet-shaped, small and irregular rod-shaped and large rod-shaped) were obtained after 1 d under several conditions. The crystals were reproduced and optimized starting from condition A6 of Wizard Classic 1 [20%(w/v) polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3000, 100 mM sodium citrate/citric acid pH 5.5]. Large rod-shaped crystals were obtained using the hanging-drop method. Each drop, consisting of 0.9 µl protein solution and 0.9 µl reservoir solution, was positioned over 1 ml reservoir solution. Optimization was achieved by varying the sodium citrate pH (4.5–6.0) and the concentration of PEG 3000 [10–30%(w/v)]. After 2 d, rod-shaped AbCBL crystals with adequate dimensions were obtained using a reservoir solution consisting of 0.1 M sodium citrate/citric acid pH 4.5, 19.8% PEG 3350 (Table 2).

Table 2. Crystallization.

Method Hanging-drop vapour diffusion
Plate type 24-well NeXtal crystallization plate
Temperature (K) 287
Protein concentration (mgml1) 10
Buffer composition of protein solution 25mM TrisHCl pH 7.5, 30mM NaCl, 10%(v/v) glycerol
Composition of reservoir solution 0.1M sodium citrate/citric acid pH 4.5, 19.8% PEG 3350
Volume and ratio of drop 1.8l (0.9l protein solution:0.9l reservoir solution)
Volume of reservoir (l) 1000

2.3. Data collection and processing  

The fully grown crystals (0.2 × 0.02 × 0.01 mm) were flash-cooled at 100 K in liquid nitrogen using 20%(v/v) glycerol in the reservoir as a cryoprotectant. X-ray diffraction data were collected from the cryoprotected crystals (at 100 K) on an ADSC 315r detector using 1° oscillations with a crystal-to-detector distance of 200 mm on beamline 5C SBII at the Pohang Light Source (PLS), Republic of Korea. The crystals diffracted to a resolution of 1.57 Å. Diffraction data were integrated and scaled using the HKL-2000 program package (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Data-collection and processing statistics are given in Table 3.

Table 3. Data collection and processing.

Values in parentheses are for the outer shell.

Diffraction source 5A SBII, PLS
Wavelength () 0.97949
Temperature (K) 100
Detector ADSC 315r
Crystal-to-detector distance (mm) 200
Rotation range per image () 1
Total rotation range () 360
Exposure time per image (s) 1
Space group P3112
Unit-cell parameters (, ) a = b = 102.9, c = 136.5, = = 90, = 120
Mosaicity () 0.2
Resolution range () 50.01.57 (1.681.57)
Total No. of reflections 1812882
No. of unique reflections 114594
R merge (%) 25.2 (82.5)
R meas (%) 26.0 (86.1)
R p.i.m. § (%) 6.4 (24.1)
CC1/2 (%) 99.5 (53.2)
Completeness (%) 99.9 (99.5)
Multiplicity 15.8 (12.2)
I/(I) 52.8 (8.1)

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where Ii(hkl) is the observed intensity and I(hkl) is the average intensity of multiple observations of symmetry-related reflections.

R meas = Inline graphic Inline graphic.

§

CC1/2 is the half-set correlation coefficient as described by Karplus Diederichs (2012).

3. Results and discussion  

The homogeneity of the purified protein was analyzed by SDS–PAGE (Fig. 1). The molecular weight of purified AbCBL (which includes 14 residues preceding the N-terminus of wild-type AbCBL) is 44.0 kDa. The optimized crystals obtained using condition A6 of Wizard Classic 1 (Fig. 2) were finally chosen for X-ray diffraction. The AbCBL crystal belonged to the trigonal space group P3112, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 102.9, c = 136.5 Å. The diffraction image did not show any signs of anisotropic diffraction; however, the R merge is quite high. This could result from decay of the crystals induced by X-rays or from an inadequate use of cryoprotectant. As per the calculated Matthews coefficient (Matthews, 1968), there are probably two monomers in the asymmetric unit, with a corresponding V M of 2.3 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 46.9%. Self-rotation functions were calculated by MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010) using data in the resolution range 50–4 Å at χ = 180, 120, 90 and 60° to detect twofold, threefold, fourfold and sixfold symmetry, respectively. Significant peaks were only found in the χ = 180 and 120° sections and confirmed three twofold and one threefold symmetries (Fig. 3). In addition to the crystallographic symmetry, the χ = 180 and 120° sections also showed weak peaks of noncrystallographic symmetry. Thus, the self-rotation function provides no conclusive information concerning the presence or location of noncrystallographic symmetry. The phase of the AbCBL structure is being determined by molecular replacement (MR) using cystathionine γ-synthase from N. tabacum (PDB entry 1qgn; Steegborn et al., 1999) with 28% sequence identity as the search model.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Purified AbCBL (lane P) is shown on a 10% SDS–PAGE gel. Lane M contains molecular-mass marker (labelled in kDa).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Crystals of AbCBL obtained from 0.1 M sodium citrate/citric acid buffer pH 4.5 containing 19.8%(w/v) PEG 3350. The scale bar represents 0.02 mm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Self-rotation functions calculated by MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010) using data from 50 to 4.0 Å resolution. (a) χ = 180°, (b) χ = 120°.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to staff members at beamline 5C SBII of Pohang Light Source, Republic of Korea. This research was supported by research grants from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (PJ009500), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea; the 2014 KU Brain Pool of Konkuk University; and the National Research Laboratory Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (No. 2011-0027928).

References

  1. Belfaiza, J., Parsot, C., Martel, A., de la Tour, C. B., Margarita, D., Cohen, G. N. & Saint-Girons, I. (1986). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 867–871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Breitinger, U., Clausen, T., Ehlert, S., Huber, R., Laber, B., Schmidt, F., Pohl, E. & Messerschmidt, A. (2001). Plant Physiol. 126, 631–642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Clausen, T., Huber, R., Laber, B., Pohlenz, H. D. & Messerschmidt, A. (1996). J. Mol. Biol. 262, 202–224. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Clausen, T., Huber, R., Prade, L., Wahl, M. C. & Messerschmidt, A. (1998). EMBO J. 17, 6827–6838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Clifton, M. C., Abendroth, J., Edwards, T. E., Leibly, D. J., Gillespie, A. K., Ferrell, M., Dieterich, S. H., Exley, I., Staker, B. L., Myler, P. J., Van Voorhis, W. C. & Stewart, L. J. (2011). Acta Cryst. F67, 1154–1158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Ejim, L. J., D’Costa, V. M., Elowe, N. H., Loredo-Osti, J. C., Malo, D. & Wright, G. D. (2004). Infect. Immun. 72, 3310–3314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Espinal, P., Macià, M. D., Roca, I., Gato, E., Ruíz, E., Fernández-Cuenca, F., Oliver, A., Rodríguez-Baño, J., Bou, G., Tomás, M. & Vila, J. (2013). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 589–591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Huynh, K. H., Tran, H.-T., Pham, T.-V., Ngo, H.-P.-T., Cha, S.-S., Chung, K. M., Lee, S. H. & Kang, L.-W. (2014). Acta Cryst. F70, 505–508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Karplus, P. A. & Diederichs, K. (2012). Science, 336, 1030–1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 32, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Nguyen, D.-D., Ngo, H.-P.-T., Hong, M., Pham, T.-V., Lee, J. H., Lee, J. J., Kwon, D. B., Lee, S. H. & Kang, L.-W. (2013). Acta Cryst. F69, 1041–1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 277, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Peleg, A. Y., Seifert, H. & Paterson, D. L. (2008). Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21, 538–582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Perez, F., Hujer, A. M., Hujer, K. M., Decker, B. K., Rather, P. N. & Bonomo, R. A. (2007). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 3471–3484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Roca, I., Espinal, P., Vila-Farrés, X. & Vila, J. (2012). Front. Microbiol. 3, 148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. Steegborn, C. & Clausen, T. (2000). Rec. Res. Dev. Biochem. 2, 191–207.
  17. Steegborn, C., Messerschmidt, A., Laber, B., Streber, W., Huber, R. & Clausen, T. (1999). J. Mol. Biol. 290, 983–996. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 22–25. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, J. C., So, B. H., Kim, J. H., Park, Y. J., Lee, B. M. & Kang, H. W. (2008). Plant Pathol. 57, 1136–1145.

Articles from Acta Crystallographica. Section F, Structural Biology Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES