Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2013 Dec 4;54(2):123–128. doi: 10.1007/s12088-013-0442-8

Advances in Taxonomy of Genus Phoma: Polyphyletic Nature and Role of Phenotypic Traits and Molecular Systematics

Mahendra Kumar Rai 1, Vaibhav V Tiwari 1, László Irinyi 2, György János Kövics 2,
PMCID: PMC4188486  PMID: 25320410

Abstract

Phoma is a highly polyphyletic genus with its unclear species boundaries. The conventional system of identification is functional but it has its limitations. Besides morphological studies, chemotaxonomy, secondary metabolite and protein profiling have been assessed for the classification and identification of these fungi. Molecular datasets have provided a better outlook towards the phylogenetic and evolutionary trends of Phoma. Molecular markers such as ITS-rDNA, tubulin, actin, translation elongation factor have been widely used by the taxonomists to demarcate species. However, outcomes gained up till now represent preliminary step towards the study of Phoma systematics and a combined approach would be beneficial in the understanding of this polyphyletic group members. Lately, on the base of molecular phylogeny of the type species of the seven Phoma sections a new teleomorph family, Didymellaceae has been established, besides the Phaeosphaeriaceae related to sect. Paraphoma anamorphs, and the Leptosphaeriaceae to sect. Heterospora anamorphs. The estimated ratio is about 70 % of the recognized Phoma-like species can be associated with the Didymellaceae ascomycetous family.

Keywords: Phoma, Systematics, Didymellaceae, ITS-rDNA, Translation elongation factor, tef1 sequences, β-tubulin

Introduction

Phoma species are geographically prevalent and are found in diverse ecological niches. In spite of having numerous harmless saprobic species, Phoma species have been well known as imperative plant pathogen on economically important plants [1, 2]. The identification of isolates based on morphological characters is often conceded beneath extreme time restraints. However, generation of vast morphological and anatomical data over the years had built up a strong base for the taxonomic studies of Phoma. But, this often lacked satisfactory resolution and thus should always be compared with the conclusions from molecular data sources. Moreover, there have been efforts to classify fungi based on secondary metabolite profiles [3]. Chemotaxonomy is the use of chemical diversity as a taxonomic tool which means classification and identification of filamentous fungi based on profiles of secondary metabolites.

The major objective of any taxonomic study includes systematic grouping of taxa of interest through generation of robust natural classification based on constant characteristics which reveal their factual evolutionary record and development of trustworthy identification key(s) for uncomplicated taxon determination. Molecular taxonomic methods are the most widely accepted tools for identification of the appropriate taxonomic level at which it would be most informative and its correlation with morphologically definable taxonomic groupings.

Identification on the Basis of Phenotypic Characteristics

Phoma is taxonomically a controversial genus. It consists of over 200 known species, found all over the world. The original genus concept of Saccardo [4] was emended by Boerema and Bollen [5] and after more than 40 years of taxonomical research, the admitted Phoma species were arranged in nine sections [6, 7], which are mainly based on a single or just a few morphological characters and have not been confirmed as biologically realistic by molecular biological studies [2, 8].

Recently there is a convention of using a single generic name, based on priority but regardless of whether the genus is “anamorphic” or “teleomorphic”. This classification is used for all unambiguous monophyletic phylogenetic lineages [2].

The nine Phoma sections have teleomorph relations described in the genera Didymella, Mycosphaerella, Leptosphaeria and Pleospora [6] indicating that Phoma anamorphs represent a polyphyletic group. For a long time the genera Phoma and Ascochyta, both classified in the Pleosporales of Ascomycota, have already been considered as closely related [9]. The species of genus Phoma fungi reproduce asexually and a typical colony of the genus has a velvety texture which can be slightly powdery, depending on the species. It may be white to gray with pink, yellow, and reddish purple colourations. Pycnidia contain single celled masses of spores which are known as pycn(idi)ospores or conidia. With the effect of different factors like pH, temperature, light, etc. the culture characteristics and morphology differs [1012]. They are also known to produce variety of secondary metabolites in the form of dyes, antibiotics, etc. [1329].

Phoma species are ubiquitous and are common inhabitants of soil [1, 3035] and they may periodically infect plants by causing root infections and different spot/blotch diseases [3641]. Moreover, Phoma species have also been reported as opportunistic invasive pathogen in humans [4248].

A variety of significant agronomic crops are susceptible to the wide-ranging species of the genus Phoma [4952].

Until the late seventies, majority of the Indian species of Phoma were erected on the basis of host alone [5364], and thus the importance of host specificity for the taxonomy of Phoma has been much emphasized and overestimated. Up to eighties many mycologist in India did not consider morphological characters for identification and differentiation of Phoma species in culture. Usually, a morphological species may attack various host plants. For example, P. exigua was reported on different hosts [65]. The criterion of identification should be in such a way so that it should be possible to identify a Phoma species in case host identification is difficult particularly when floral parts are lacking, or when the fungus is grown on artificial media. These have created taxonomic dilemmas and misinterpretations with superfluous species descriptions.

The growth and colour of the colony helps in differentiating the species in the genus Phoma [66]. On the basis of cultural and morphological characteristics of Phoma was assembled in 20 broad groups [38, 6773]. Furthermore, there were studied effects of different factors such as different colours of light, temperature and different media on the morphology and cultural characteristics of different Phoma species [10, 14, 36, 74, 75].

Previously the erection of new species of Phoma was mostly based on host and sometimes on shape and size of pycnidia and pycnospores. The key to identification of Phoma was summarized by Boerema et al. [7] on the basis of their morphological appearances. This key is enormously helpful in identifying strains up to species level but it has its limitations as several taxa exhibit characters that are representative of different sections [76].

The erection of Phoma species on the basis of traditional methods particularly on host was a criterion which dominated up to early seventies. Later, mycologists realized the importance of morphological characters for creating a new Phoma species. The most important morphological characteristics include the formation of pycnidia, conidia and chlamydospores. Although, size and septation of the conidia are also important criteria for species identification, at times the conidium dimensions may differ in the strains of the same species.

As numbers of fungi grow on wide range of culture media, fungal taxonomists use these physiological and biochemical tools for the identification and classification purpose [53]. Growth rates on distinct media can also be exploited for the differential studies of filamentous fungi.

As Phoma species are morphologically similar and hence discrimination of the species based on the production of secondary metabolites, cultural characteristics, mostly depends on the growth conditions, which are not reliable. Thus, it can be conferred that phenotypic characters cannot always be distinctive between taxa and the aid of molecular systematics will rather helpful in delineating the unclear species boundaries of this controversial genus.

Determining the Identity of Phoma by Multiple Approach

Secondary metabolite profiling has also been assessed as one of the marker for differentiation among filamentous fungi including Phoma-like species [3, 77]. Secondary metabolites are usually a mixture of closely related molecules with a peculiar and exceptional chemical structure such as steroids, terpenes, alkaloids, cyclopeptides, and coumarins. Some of these are mycotoxins. With the advent of modern chromatographic techniques the profiling is easy fast and reliable which has resulted in a vast array of secondary metabolite data. Conversely, this method has a drawback as the production of these secondary metabolites can be affected by different factors such as environmental conditions, temperature and pH [53].

Isozyme comparative studies were made to delineate of α-esterase isozyme profiles of some Phoma species and varieties [78]. Simple band-counting technique is used for differentiation, although phylogenetic information can be retrieved from allelic frequencies and other genetic interpretation data. Furthermore, this analysis can be used to identify unknown species or to identify a pathogen in a mixed infection.

Identification Based on Molecular Datasets

Recently, the use of molecular datasets in phylogenetic assessment has gained much popularity among the mycologists. Molecular data such as RAPD, RFLP analyses and the use of DNA sequences are very commonly used by mycologists [79]. ITS-rDNA sequences are divergent and vary between species within a genus hence it is the most popular choice in molecular systematics.

Generic Regions Responsible for Identification of Phoma sp.

The molecular based phylogenetic analyses within Phoma genus have only been used for defining phylogenetic relationships among isolates within one or closely related species, however recently serial publications came out with re-classification consequences of Phoma-like fungi on the base of molecular data [1, 2, 8, 9, 49, 76, 8082].

Molecular taxonomy is an essential part for authentication of established species concept, identification and taxonomic revision of well-established species based on phenotypic and ecological characters and also desired for the detection of cryptic species (species where no morphological differences exist) [8385]. With the advent of PCR wide range of molecular markers viz. nuclear ribosomal markers (ITS-rDNA), protein coding genes (tubulin genes, translation elongation factor, actin, histone gene, etc.) have been expedited by fungal taxonomists for the study of both phylogenetic and population structure studies [86]. Some of these markers which are used predominantly have been discussed briefly below.

Nuclear rDNA Sequences

Bi-parental, nuclear ITS regions are one of the most popular choices for phylogenetic inference for genus level or below due to higher rate of base substitution than most of the organellar genes [2, 49, 79, 80]. Hence, it has typically been most useful for molecular systematics at the species level, and even within species to identify geographic races.

ITS, refers to a piece of non-functional RNA situated between structural ribosomal RNAs (rRNA) on a common precursor transcript. This polycistronic rRNA precursor transcript contains the 5′-external transcribed sequence (5′-ETS), 18S rRNA, ITS1, 5.8S rRNA, ITS2, 26S rRNA and finally the 3′-ETS. During rRNA maturation, ETS and ITS pieces are excised and as non-functional maturation by-products rapidly degraded. Genes encoding ribosomal RNA and spacers occur in tandem repeats that are thousands of copies long, each separated by regions of non-transcribed DNA termed intergenic spacer (IGS) or non-transcribed spacer (NTS) [86]. Sequence comparison of the ITS region is widely used in taxonomy and molecular phylogeny.

Tubulin Gene

Tubulin is one of the members of globular heterodimeric proteins. The most common classes are alpha (α) and beta (β) tubulin having molecular weight of about 55 kDa [8790]. These proteins are responsible for the production of microtubules. β-tubulin is encoded by highly conserved multigene families or in some cases single genes. On the basis of tubulin genes wide range of organisms are erected and characterized leading to the successful determination of inter- and intraspecific relationships [49, 80, 91].

Translation Elongation Factors (tef) Gene

Elongation factors are set of proteins used in protein synthesis. They facilitate translational elongation starting from the first to the last peptide bond in ribosome. The translation elongation factor 1 alpha gene (tef1) has been widely used for the phylogenetic and taxonomic evaluation study of Phoma [80]. Single-copy genes have the benefit that any sequence variation within a spore can be recognized explicitly to disparity among nuclei.

Actin Gene

The actin gene encodes actin, a multifunctional protein found in all eukaryotic cells and is one of the highly conserved proteins. These genes have been used to study evolutionary relationships among Phoma species [92]. Moreover, these genes assist in exploring the additional information about genetic structure in these fungi.

Histone Protein Gene

Eukaryotic genomic DNA is wrapped with histone proteins in nucleosomes the fundamental units of chromatin [9395]. The nucleosome comprises of the DNA enfolded around an octamer of core histones consisting of two copies each of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 assembled in one H3–H4 heterotetramer and two H2A–H2B heterodimers [96]. Histone protein gene helps in the comparative studies of intron insertion sites among the different organisms.

DNA Barcoding

With the advancement in sequencing and computational methodologies DNA sequences have become a major source of information for evolutionary and genetic relationships. Comparative sequence analysis has emerged in almost all fields of biological sciences. A short standardized sequence that can distinguish the individual from the species forms the basis of DNA barcoding [97]. Barcoding is usually carried out by the retrieval of a DNA sequence i.e. a barcode from a specific gene region. This unknown barcode is then compared with the other barcodes present in the library of reference barcode sequences.

The most preferred DNA barcode region for fungi is ITS but it not enough to delineate all the taxa [98, 99]. However, according to Aveskamp et al. [81] actin gene can also be considered for developing DNA barcodes for Phoma species.

Conclusions

Phoma with its unclear species boundaries still remains a taxonomically controversial genus. A vast array of morphological as well as molecular data have been generated still there are many questions that has to be addressed with numerous species yet to be discovered. Though the traditional method of identification lacks the specificity it still cannot be outlined in the presence of modern techniques of molecular systematics. Morphological studies still forms the basis of the preliminary level identification and thus is applicable and aid to morphological species recognition. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that a multiple approach, including molecular tools, would provide a better understanding for the constant and reliable identification of Phoma species. Lately, towards a reclassification of the Phoma complex, on the data of molecular phylogeny, a new ascomycetous teleomorph family, Didymellaceae has been established, besides to the Phaeosphaeriaceae and Leptosphaeriaceae [9]. Based on the sequence data, it is estimated that approximately 70 % of the species recognised by Boerema et al. [7] can be associated with the Didymellaceae [2].

References

  • 1.Aveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Crous PW. Biology and recent developments in the systematics of Phoma, a complex genus of major quarantine significance. Fung Diversity. 2008;31:1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Woudenberg JHC, Verkley GJM, Crous PW. Highlights of the Didymellaceae: a polyphasic approach to characterise Phoma and related pleosporalean genera. Stud Mycol. 2010;65:1–60. doi: 10.3114/sim.2010.65.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frisvad JC, Andersen B, Thrane U. The use of secondary metabolite profiling in chemotaxonomy of filamentous fungi. Mycol Res. 2008;112:231–240. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saccardo PA. Conspectus generum fungorum Italiae inferiorum, nempe ad Sphaeropsideas, Melanconieas et Hyphomyceteas pertinentium, systemate sporologico dispositorum. Michelia. 1880;2:1–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boerema GH, Bollen GJ. Conidiogenesis and conidial septation as differentiating criteria between Phoma and Ascochyta. Persoonia. 1975;8:111–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boerema GH. Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes)—V. subdivision of the genus in sections. Mycotaxon. 1997;64:321–333. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Boerema GH, de Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME, Hamers MEC. Phoma identification manual: differentiation of specific and infra-specific taxa in culture. Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kövics GJ, Sándor E, Rai MR, Irinyi L (2013) Phoma-like fungi of soybeans. Crit Rev Microbiol. http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/1040841X.2012.755948 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.de Gruyter J, Aveskamp MM, Woudenberg JHC, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. Molecular phylogeny of Phoma and allied anamorph genera: towards a reclassification of the Phoma complex. Mycol Res. 2009;113:508–519. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rajak RC, Rai MK. Effect of different factors on the morphology and cultural characters of 18-species and 5-varieties of Phoma. I. Effect of different media. Bibl Mycologia. 1983;91:301–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rajak RC, Rai MK. A new leaf-spot disease of Jasminum pubescence caused by Phoma herbarum. Indian J Mycol Plant Pathol. 1984;42:173. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Irinyi L, Kövics GJ, Rai MK, Sándor E (2006) Studies of evolutionary relationships of Phoma species based on phylogenetic markers. pp. 99–113 In: 4th International Plant Protection Symposium at Debrecen University, 18–19 October 2006. Recent developments of IPM. Proceedings. Kövics GJ, Dávid I (eds) Debrecen University, Hungary
  • 13.Heiny DK. Phoma probocis sp. nov. pathogenic on Convolvulus arvensis. Mycotaxon. 1990;36:457–471. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Heiny DK. Field survival of Phoma proboscis and synergism with herbicides for control of field bindweed. Plant Dis. 1994;78:1156–1164. doi: 10.1094/PD-78-1156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rajak RC, Farkya S, Hasija SK, Pandey AK. Fungi associated with congress weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) Proc Nat Acad Sci India. 1990;60:165–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heiny DK, Templeton GE. Effects of spore concentration, temperature and dew period on disease of field bindweed caused by Phoma proboscis. Phytopathology. 1991;81:905–909. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-81-905. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fogliano V, Marchese A, Scaloni A, Ritieni A, Visconti AG, Randazzo G, Graniti A. Characterization of a 60 kDa phytotoxic glycoprotein produced by Phoma tracheiphila and its relation to malseccin. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1998;53:149–161. doi: 10.1006/pmpp.1998.0172. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Baxter CJ, Magan N, Lane B, Wildman HG (1998) Influence of water activity and temperature on in vitro growth of surface cultures of a Phoma sp., and production of the pharmaceutical metabolites, squalestatin S1 and S2. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 3:328–332
  • 19.Pandey S, Pandey AK. Mycoherbicidal potential of some fungi against Lantana camara L.: a preliminary observation. J Trop For. 2000;16:28–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rai MK. Diversity and biotechnological applications of Indian species of Phoma. In: Rao GP, Manoharachari C, Bhat DJ, Rajak RC, Lakhanpal TN, editors. Frontiers of fungal diversity in India. Lucknow: International Book Distributing Co; 2002. pp. 179–204. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zimin L, Paul RJ, William F. A cyclic carbonate and related polyketides from a marine-derived fungus of the genus Phoma. Phytochemistry. 2003;64:571–574. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00272-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shibazaki M, Taniguchi M, Yokoi T, Nagai K, Watanabe M, Suzuki K, Yamamoto T. YM-215343, a novel antifungal compound from Phoma sp. QNO4621. J Antibiot. 2004;57:379–382. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.57.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Koyama N, Nagahiro T, Yamaguchi Y, Ohshiro T, Masuma R, Tomoda H, Omura S. Spylidone, a novel inhibitor of lipid droplet accumulation in mouse macrophages produced by Phoma sp. FKI-1840. J Antibiot. 2005;58:338–345. doi: 10.1038/ja.2005.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cimmino A, Andolfi A, Berestetskiy A, Evidente A. Production of phytotoxins by Phoma exigua var. exigua, a potential mycoherbicide against perennial thistles. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:630–634. doi: 10.1021/jf8004178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pedras M, Soledade C, Yang Y. Structural and biological activity of maculansin A, a phytotoxin from the phytopathogenic fungus Leptosphaeria maculans. Phytochemistry. 2008;69:2966–2971. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hoffman AM, Mayer SG, Strobel GA, Hess WM, Sovocool GW, Grange AH, Harper JK, Arif AM, Grant DM, Kelley-Swift EG. Purification, identification and activity of phomodione, a furandione from an endophytic Phoma species. Phytochemistry. 2008;69:1049–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liermann JC, Kolshorn H, Opatz T, Thines E, Anke H. Xanthepinone, an antimicrobial polyketide from a soil fungus closely related to Phoma medicaginis. J Nat Prod. 2009;72:1905–1907. doi: 10.1021/np9005234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rai MK, Deshmukh P, Gade A, Ingle A, Kövics GJ, Irinyi L. Phoma Saccardo: distribution, secondary metabolite production and biotechnological applications. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009;35:182–196. doi: 10.1080/10408410902975992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Qin S, Hussain H, Schulz B, Draeger S, Krohn K. Two new metabolites, epoxydine A and B, from Phoma sp. Helv Chim Acta. 2010;93:169–174. doi: 10.1002/hlca.200900199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pellegrino C, Gilardi G, Gullino ML, Garibaldi A. Detection of Phoma valerianellae in lamb’s lettuce seeds. Phytoparasitica. 2010;38:159–165. doi: 10.1007/s12600-010-0084-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Garibaldi A, Gilardi G, Gullino ML. First report of leaf spot caused by Phoma multirostrata on Fuchsia × hybrida in Italy. Plant Dis. 2010;94:382. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-3-0382A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Strobel G, Singh SK, Riyaz-Ul-Hassan S, Mitchell AM, Geary B, Sears J. An endophytic/pathogenic Phoma sp. from creosote bush producing biologically active volatile compounds having fuel potential. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;320:87–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02297.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang X, Wang J, Gao J, Yang L. First report of leaf spot disease on Schisandra chinensis caused by Phoma glomerata in China. Plant Dis. 2012;96:289. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-11-0760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li YP, Wright DG, Lanoiselet V, Wang CP, Eyres N, Real D, You MP, Barbetti MJ. First report of Phoma herbarum on tedera (Bituminaria bituminosa var. albomarginata) in Australia. Plant Dis. 2012;96:769. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-11-1040-PDN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Patil VB, Mali AM, Mahamuni RJ, Chavan NS, Kamble SS. First report of leaf spot caused by Phoma costarricensis on Delphinium malabaricum in Western Ghats of India. Plant Dis. 2012;96:1074. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-11-1012-PDN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rajak RC, Rai MK. Effect of different colours of light and temperatures on the morphology of three species of Phoma in vitro. Jabalpur Univ. 1982;1:6. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rai MK. Identity and taxonomy of hitherto unreported pathogen causing leaf-spot disease of ginger in India. Mycotaxon. 1993;46:329–333. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rai MK, Rajak RC. Effect of different factors on the morphology and cultural characters of 18 species and 5 varieties of Phoma III. effect of different carbon sources. Indian J Mycol Plant Pathol. 1993;23:311–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boerema GH, de Gruyter J. Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes)—VII. Section Sclerophomella: taxa with thick-walled pseudoparenchymatous pycnidia. Persoonia. 1998;17:81–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Boerema GH, de Gruyter J. Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) III.—Supplement. Additional species of section Plenodomus. Persoonia. 1999;17:273–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kövics GJ, Pandey AK, Rai MK. Phoma Saccardo and related genera: some new perspectives in taxonomy and biotechnology. In: Deshmukh SK, Rai MK, editors. Biodiversity of fungi: their role in human life. Plymouth: Science Publishers Inc, Enfield (NH); 2005. pp. 129–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bakerspigel A, Lowe D, Rostras A. The isolation of Phoma eupyrena from a human lesion. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:362–363. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1981.01650060052024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rai MK. Phoma sorghina infection in human being. Mycopathol. 1989;105:167–170. doi: 10.1007/BF00437250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rosen T, Rinaldi MJ, Tschen JA, Stern JK, Cernoch P. Cutaneous lesions due to Pleurophoma (Phoma) complex. Southern Med J. 1996;89:431–433. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199604000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rishi K, Font RL. Keratitis caused by an unusual fungus. Phoma species. Cornea. 2003;22:166–168. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200303000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Balis E, Velegraki A, Fragou A, Pefanis A, Kalabokas T, Mountokalakis T. Lung mass caused by Phoma exigua. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006;38:552–555. doi: 10.1080/00365540500400969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tullio V, Banche G, Allizond V, Roana J, Mandras N, Scalasa D, Panzoneb M, Cervetti O, Valle S, Carlone N, Cuffini AM. Non-dermatophyte moulds as skin and nail foot mycosis agents: Phoma herbarum, Chaetomium globosum and Microascus cinereus. Fung Biol. 2010;114:345–349. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Roehm CE, Salazar JC, Haqstrom N, Valdez TA. Phoma and Acremonium invasive fungal rhinosinusitis in congenital acute lymphocytic leukemia and literature review. Int J Pediatr Otorhi. 2012;76:1387–1391. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Irinyi L, Kövics GJ, Sándor E. Taxonomical re-evalution of Phoma-like soybean pathogenic fungi. Mycol Res. 2009;113:249–260. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kövics GJ. Comments to the taxonomical problems of some plant pathogenic fungi (genera Ascochyta,Phoma, Phyllosticta) Review. (in Hungarian with English summary) Növényvédelem (Plant Protection) 1995;31:307–315. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kövics GJ, de Gruyter J, van der Aa HA. Phoma sojicola comb. nov., and other hyaline-spored coelomycetes pathogenic on soybean. Mycol Res. 1999;103:1065–1070. doi: 10.1017/S0953756298007990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Castell-Miller CV, Zeyen RJ. Infection and development of Phoma medicaginis on moderately resistant and susceptible alfalfa genotypes. Can J Plant Pathol. 2007;29:290–298. doi: 10.1080/07060660709507472. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Guarro J, Gene J, Stchigel AM. Developments in fungal taxonomy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:454–500. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.3.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tandon RN, Bilgrami KS. A new species of Phoma on the phylloclades of Muehlenbeckia platyclados. Proc Nat Acad Sci India. 1960;30B:331–333. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bilgrami KS. Association of a new species of Phoma with Pleospora herbarum (Pers.) Rabh. Curr Sci. 1963;32:174–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Agarwal GP, Sahni VP. Fungi causing plant diseases at Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh)-IX. Mycopathol. 1964;22:245–248. doi: 10.1007/BF02049057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dutta BG, Ghosh GR. Soil fungi from Orissa IV. soil fungi of paddy fields. Mycologia. 1965;25:316–322. doi: 10.1007/BF02049919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chandra S, Tandon RN. Two new leaf-spot fungi. Curr Sci. 1965;34:565–566. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chandra S, Tandon RN. Three new leaf-infecting fungi from Allahabad. Mycopathol. 1966;29:273–276. doi: 10.1007/BF02128455. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hasija SK. Additions to the fungi of Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh) V. Mycopathol. 1966;28:33–41. doi: 10.1007/BF02276020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shreemali JL. Some new members of Sphaeropsidales from India. Indian Phytopathol. 1972;25:58–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shreemali JL. Some new leaf infecting fungi. Indian J Mycol Plant Pathol. 1973;3:112–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jamaluddin M, Tandon P, Tandon RN. A fruit rot of aonla (Phyllanthus emblica L.) caused by Phoma sp. Proc Nat Acad Sci India. 1975;45:75–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rai JN, Misra JK. A new species of Phoma from Indian alkaline soil. Curr Sci. 1981;50:377. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rao S, Thirumalachar U. Phoma exigua infecting brinjal leaves. Indian Phytopath. 1981;34:37. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rai MK. Taxonomic studies of species of Phoma isolated from air. J Econ Taxon Bot. 1985;7:645–647. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rai MK. Two new diseases of Albizzia lebbek and Jasminum sambac. Acta Bot Indica. 1986;14:170–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rai MK. Two new diseases of cultivated plant. Acta Bot Indica. 1986;14:238–239. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rai MK. Phoma research in India: a review. In: Rai MK, Varma A, Rajak RC, editors. Integrated management of plant resources. Jodhpur: Scientific Publisher (India); 2000. pp. 337–371. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rai MK, Rajak RC. A new leaf-spot disease of Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. Curr Sci. 1982;51:98–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rai MK, Rajak RC. A report of leaf-spot disease of Holoptelea integrifolia planch caused by Phoma sorghina. Indian J Mycol Plant Path. 1982;12:342. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rai MK, Rajak RC (1986/1987) A new disease of Citrus medica and the identity of its causal organism Phoma exigua var. foeveta (Foister) Boerema. Indian J Mycol Plant Pathol 16:320–321
  • 73.Rai MK, Rajak RC. Distinguishing characteristics of some Phoma species. Mycotaxon. 1993;48:389–414. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rajak RC, Rai MK. Species of Phoma from legumes. Indian Phytopath. 1982;35:609–611. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rajak RC, Rai MK. Effect of different factors on the morphology and cultural characters of 18 species and 5 varieties of Phoma. II. Effect of different pH. Nova Hedwigia. 1984;40:299–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Aveskamp MM, Verkley GJM, de Gruyter J, Murace MA, Perello A, Woudenberg JHC, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. DNA phylogeny reveals polyphyly of Phoma section Peyronellaea and multiple taxonomic novelties. Mycologia. 2009;101:363–382. doi: 10.3852/08-199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Noordeloos ME, de Gruyter J, Eijk GW, Roeijmans HJ. Production of dendritic crystals in pure cultures of Phoma and Ascochyta and its value as a taxonomic character relative to morphology, pathology and cultural characteristics. Mycol Res. 1993;97:1343–1350. doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80168-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kövics GJ, de Gruyter J. Comparative studies of esterase isozyme patterns of some Phoma species occurring on soybean. (in Hungarian with English summary) Sci Public Agric Univ Debrecen. 1995;31:191–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tiwari VV, Gade AK, Rai MK. A study of phylogenetic variations among Indian Phoma tropica species by RAPD-PCR and ITS-rDNA sequencing. Ind J Biotechnol. 2013;12:187–194. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Irinyi L, Gade AK, Ingle AP, Kövics GJ, Rai MK, Sándor E. Morphology and molecular biology of Phoma. In: Gherbawy Y, Mach RL, Rai MK, editors. Current advances in molecular mycology. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2009. pp. 171–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Aveskamp MM, Woudenberg JHC, de Gruyter J, Turco E, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. Development of taxon-specific sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers based on actin sequences and DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF): a case study in the Phoma exigua species complex. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10:403–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00540.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.de Gruyter J, Woudenberg JHC, Aveskamp MM, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. Systematic reappraisal of species in Phoma section Paraphoma, Pyrenochaeta and Pleurophoma. Mycologia. 2010;102:1066–1081. doi: 10.3852/09-240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Goker M, Garcia-Blazquez G, Voglmayr H, Telleria MT, Martin MP. Molecular taxonomy of phytopathogenic fungi: a case study in Peronospora. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Knowlton N. Sibling species in the sea. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1993;24:189–216. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Grube M, Kroken S. Molecular approaches and concept of species and species complexes in lichenized fungi. Mycol Res. 2000;104:1284–1294. doi: 10.1017/S0953756200003476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Glass NL, Donaldson GC. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous Ascomycetes. Appl Env Microbiol. 1995;61:1323–1330. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Cleveland DW, Sullivan KF. Molecular biology and genetics of tubulin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:331–365. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.001555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Joshi HC, Cleveland DW. Diversity among tubulin subunits: toward what functional end? Cell Motil Cytoskel. 1990;16:159–163. doi: 10.1002/cm.970160302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Löwe J, Li H, Downing KH, Nogales E. Refined structure of alpha beta-tubulin at 3.5 a resolution. J Mol Biol. 2001;313:1045–1057. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Saussede-Aim J, Dumontet C. Regulation of tubulin expression: multiple overlapping mechanisms. Int J Med Medic Sci. 2009;1:290–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lee RCH, Williams BAP, Brown AMV, Adamson ML, Keeling PJ. α- and β-tubulin phylogenies support a close relationship between the microsporidia Brachiola algerae and Antonospora locustae. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2008;55:388–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Dangre DM, Rathod DP, Gade AK, Rai MK. An in silico molecular evolutionary analysis of selected species of Phoma: a comparative approach. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2009;2:295–309. doi: 10.4172/jpb.1000089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hays SM, Swanson J, Selker EU. Identification and characterization of the genes encoding the core histones and histone variants of Neurospora crassa. Genetics. 2002;160:961–973. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Luger K. Dynamic nucleosomes. Chromosome Res. 2006;14:5–16. doi: 10.1007/s10577-005-1026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yun CS, Nishida H. Distribution of introns in fungal histone genes. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wunsch MJ, Bergstrom GC. Genetic and morphological evidence that Phomasclerotioides, a causal agent of brown root rot of alfalfa, is composed of a species complex. Phytopathology. 2011;101:594–610. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-10-0107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Goldstein PZ, DeSalle R. Integrating DNA barcode data and taxonomic practice: determination, discovery and description. BioEssays. 2010;33:135–147. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Seifert KA. Integrating DNA barcoding into the mycological sciences. Persoonia. 2008;21:162–167. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Seifert KA. Progress towards DNA barcoding of fungi. Mol Ecol Res. 2009;9:83–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02635.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES