Abstract
Hookworms infect more than 700 million people worldwide and cause more morbidity than most other human parasitic infections. Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (the rat hookworm) has been used as an experimental model for human hookworm because of its similar life cycle and ease of maintenance in laboratory rodents. Adult N. brasiliensis, like the human hookworm, lives in the intestine of the host and releases excretory/secretory products (ESP), which represent the major host-parasite interface. We performed a comparative proteomic analysis of infective larval (L3) and adult worm stages of N. brasiliensis to gain insights into the molecular bases of host-parasite relationships and determine whether N. brasiliensis could indeed serve as an appropriate model for studying human hookworm infections. Proteomic data were matched to a transcriptomic database assembled from 245,874,892 Illumina reads from different developmental stages (eggs, L3, L4, and adult) of N. brasiliensis yielding∼18,426 unigenes with 39,063 possible isoform transcripts. From this analysis, 313 proteins were identified from ESPs by LC-MS/MS—52 in the L3 and 261 in the adult worm. Most of the proteins identified in the study were stage-specific (only 13 proteins were shared by both stages); in particular, two families of proteins—astacin metalloproteases and CAP-domain containing SCP/TAPS—were highly represented in both L3 and adult ESP. These protein families are present in most nematode groups, and where studied, appear to play roles in larval migration and evasion of the host's immune response. Phylogenetic analyses of defined protein families and global gene similarity analyses showed that N. brasiliensis has a greater degree of conservation with human hookworm than other model nematodes examined. These findings validate the use of N. brasiliensis as a suitable parasite for the study of human hookworm infections in a tractable animal model.
Nematodes belonging to the order Strongylida are, from an epidemiological and a socio-economic perspective, among the most relevant parasites in the world. Within this suborder, species from the genera Necator and Ancylostoma (also known as hookworms) infect more than 700 million people in tropical areas, and are considered to cause one of the most important human helminth infections along with schistosomiasis in terms of disability-adjusted life years lost (1–3).
Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (order Strongylida, superfamily Trichostrongyloidea) is a soil-transmitted nematode, also known as the “rodent hookworm” because of the similarities in life cycle and morphology between this species and the human hookworms Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale. For these reasons, N. brasiliensis has been extensively used as a model to study the immunobiology of gastrointestinal nematode infections (4–6). Like the human hookworms, the life cycle of N. brasiliensis is direct with no intermediate hosts; first-stage rhabditiform larvae (L1) hatch from eggs after 24 h at optimal conditions, and develop through two moults to become the infective stage, the filariform L3. L3 penetrate the skin of the host and migrate through the subcutaneous connective tissue where they enter the circulatory system and travel to the lungs before exiting into the alveolar spaces and moulting to the L4 stage. From here, they migrate up the trachea and are swallowed, finally entering the gastrointestinal tract as L4 larvae and maturing to sexually dioecious male and female adults in the small intestine where they feed and mate.
The N. brasiliensis-rodent model has been widely used as a model for human hookworm disease (4, 7–9). As a consequence of L3 migration through the tissues, N. brasiliensis stimulates a profound T helper type 2 (Th2) immune response in the skin, lungs, and intestine, including IgE production increased mucus production and inflammatory cell infiltrates consisting of eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, and innate lymyphocytes (10–16). Despite an abundance of studies addressing the mechanistic aspects of rodent immunity to N. brasiliensis infections, there is a distinct paucity of molecular information about the parasite itself. A search of the NCBI database for N. brasiliensis retrieves only 116 proteins (most of them redundant), although an early transcriptomic analysis (pre-Next Generation Sequencing technologies) described ∼1300 expressed sequence tags corresponding to 742 distinct genes (17).
Herein we present the first high-throughput proteomic characterization of the proteins present in the excretory/secretory products (ESP)1 of N. brasiliensis infective stage L3 and intestinal-dwelling adult worms based on a full exploration of the transcriptome using Illumina-based sequencing technology. Large-scale data comparisons between the secreted proteome from N. brasiliensis and available genomic and proteomic data for N. americanus were performed (18). This comprehensive analysis of the proteins and mRNAs produced by N. brasiliensis provides new insights into the molecular interactions at the host-parasite interface and highlight the molecular similarities between N. brasiliensis and N. americanus, emphasizing the utility of this model rodent nematode for exploring the immunobiology of hookworm infections, and as a model for the discovery and development of new therapeutic approaches to controlling gastrointestinal nematodes.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Parasite Material
N. brasiliensis was maintained in Sprague-Dawley rats as previously described (4, 19) and in accordance with UK Home Office and local Ethical Review Committee approvals. Infective L3s were prepared from two-week rat fecal cultures with careful preparation to ensure 100% viability. Adult worms were recovered from gastrointestinal tissue using a Baermann apparatus on day 6 post-infection following subcutaneous injection of 3000 infective L3. In addition, eggs and lung-stage larvae were included in the transcriptomic analysis to ensure that transcripts encoding proteins present in the subsequent L3 and adult worm secretomes were fully represented.
RNA Sequencing and Transcript Annotation
The RNA extraction was performed as described previously by Harcus et al. (17). Briefly, total RNA was extracted from different stages of N. brasiliensis (egg, L3, L4, and adult) and homogenized in 1 ml Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The homogenate was centrifuged (12,000 × g, 10 min), and the supernatant extracted with chloroform before isopropanol precipitation of RNA from the aqueous phase and DNase treatment. Polyadenylated (Poly(A)+) RNA was purified from 10 μg of total RNA, fragmented to a length of 100–500 bases, reverse-transcribed to cDNA, adaptor-ligated and paired-end sequenced on a Genome Analyzer II (Illumina, San Diego), obtaining paired-end reads with a length of 108 bp each. The resulting data passed a quality control (QC) where sequencing adapters and reads with low quality (< 30 PHRED) were removed. Transcript reconstruction was performed using the Trinity assembler (rev 2013–02-25) (20) using default parameters, from a pool of reads for all life stages. Also, downstream analysis for transcript abundance estimation and differential expression between life stages was performed following the protocol described in (21). Reconstructed transcripts were annotated using the Trinotate pipeline (http://trinotate.sourceforge.net/), a blastx search against the NEMBASE4 (http://www.nematodes.org/nembase4/), and against the entire genome sequence of the human hookworm N. americanus (18) to confirm their origin and rule out contamination from host or bacterial sources. Proteins were then conceptually translated from the predicted coding domains of individual cDNA sequences.
Isolation of ESP
Adult worms and L3 were recovered in saline at 37 °C, washed 6× in saline and 6× in RPMI 1640 containing 100 μg/ml penicillin and 100 U/ml streptomycin (complete medium), and viability was determined by microscopy. The collection of ESP from L3 larvae and adult worms in vitro followed previously described protocols (6, 22). Briefly, parasites recovered as above were cultured in complete medium supplemented with glucose (to 1%), at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Supernatants were collected daily from worms cultured for 2–7 days, pooled, centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min to remove any eggs, passed through a 0.2 μm Millex filter, concentrated over a 10,000 Da Amicon membrane, and stored at ∼1.0 mg/ml in PBS at −80 °C until required. N. brasiliensis adult worm somatic extract (NEx) was prepared by homogenization on ice of freshly-isolated adult worms in PBS followed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 30 min and recovery of the supernatant.
2D Electrophoresis and In-gel Digestion
The ESP of N. brasiliensis was subjected to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) and silver stained as described previously (23). Briefly, 10 μg of protein was resuspended in 125 μl of rehydration buffer (7 m Urea (Electran, BDH, Hinckley UK), 2 m thiourea (BDH), 4% CHAPS (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), 65 mm DTE (Sigma), 0.8% IPG buffer 3–10 (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont UK), and trace bromphenol blue (Sigma)), and used to rehydrate a 7 cm strip pH 3–10 (Immobiline; GE Healthcare) for 14 h at 20 °C. Proteins were then subjected to isoelectric focusing on an IPGphor (Pharmacia Biotech, Sandwich UK) at 20 °C using the following program: 1) 500 V for 30 min; 2) 1000 V for 30 min; 3) gradient to 8000 V for 6 h; 4) total ∼20 kVh. Strips were reduced and alkylated as described previously (24), and proteins were separated by molecular weight using NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris ZOOM gels (Invitrogen) and Nu-PAGE MES SDS running buffer (Invitrogen) for 2 h 10 min at constant 100 V. Gels were silver stained using PlusOne (GE Healthcare) with a few modifications as described by Yan et al. (25).
In-gel digestion of the 56 spots sliced from the gel was performed as described by Mulvenna et al. (26) with some modifications. Gel spots were washed in 50% acetonitrile, 25 mm NH4CO3 for 5 min three times at 37 °C, and then dried under a vacuum centrifuge. The spots were then reduced in 20 mm dithiothreitol (DTT) for 1 h at 65 °C, the supernatant was removed, and samples were alkylated by the addition of 55 mm iodoacetamide (IAM) and incubated at room temperature in darkness for 40 min. Gel spots were washed 3× in 25 mm NH4CO3 and dried in a vacuum centrifuge. The dried spots were rehydrated with 20 μl of 40 mm NH4CO3 containing 20 μg/ml trypsin (Sigma) for 45 min at 22 °C. An additional 50 μl of 40 mm NH4CO3, 9% acetonitrile was added to the samples and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The digest supernatant was removed from the spots, and residual peptides were removed from the gel slices by washing 3 × 0.1% TFA for 45 min at 37 °C. The original supernatant and extracts were combined and dried in a vacuum centrifuge. Samples were desalted and concentrated using Zip-Tip® (Merck Millipore, Waterford, UK) and eluted in ∼5 μl of 50% acetonitrile 0.1% TFA before mass spectral analysis.
Two-dimensional Differential In-gel Electrophoresis
The adult and L3 ESP from N. brasiliensis (5 μg) were labeled with CyDye DIGE Fluor (minimal dyes) Cy3 (green) and Cy5 (red) respectively according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were combined and subjected to IEF using IPG strips (7 cm, pH 3–10 - source) under the following settings: rehydration for 14 h at room temperature, 300 V for 30 min, 1000 V for 30 min, and gradient to 5000 V for 2 h, and followed by a second dimension separation in a NuPAGE Novex 4–12% Bis-Tris ZOOM protein gel. The gels were scanned using Fujifilm Image reader FLA-5000 series V1.0.
OFFGEL Electrophoresis
For peptide separation, OFFGEL fractionation was performed as described by Cantacessi et al. (27) with some modifications. A total of 100 μg of ESP and NEx products were resuspended in 2% SDS, 20 mm DTT and were incubated at 65 °C for 1 h. Alkylation was then achieved by adding IAM to 55 mm and incubating the solution for 40 min in darkness at 22 °C. The sample was co-precipitated with 1 μg of trypsin (Sigma) and the addition of 9 volumes of methanol and was incubated overnight at −20 °C. The sample was centrifuged and the pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of 50 mm NH4CO3 and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. After the addition of an extra 1 μg of trypsin, the sample was incubated overnight at 37 °C. The samples were then fractionated using a 3100 OFFGEL fractionator and OFFGEL kit (pH 3–10; 24-well format) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The digested proteins were diluted in peptide-focusing buffer to a final volume of 3.6 ml and 150 μl of sample were loaded into each of the 24 wells. The sample was focused in a current of 50 μA until 50 kilovolt hours (kVh) was reached. Peptide fractions were collected, dried under a vacuum centrifuge, and resuspended in 10 μl of 0.1% TFA. Finally, samples were desalted using Zip-Tip® (Merck Millipore) and dried again under a vacuum centrifuge.
Mass Spectrometry and Protein Identification
An AB SCIEX TOF/TOF 5800 mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used for acquiring MALDI-MS/MS data from gel spots, and samples without a positive identification were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. ESP separated by OFFGEL were analyzed by LC-MS/MS on a Shimadzu Prominance Nano HPLC coupled to an AB SCIEX Triple Tof 5600 mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems) equipped with a nano electrospray ion source. Six microliters of sample was injected onto a 50 mm 300 μm C18 trap column (Agilent Technologies). The samples were desalted on the trap column for 5 min using 0.1% formic acid (aq) at 30 μl/min. Peptides were then eluted onto an analytical nano HPLC column (150 mm x 75 μm 300SBC18, 3.5 μm, Agilent Technologies) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min and separated using a 35 min gradient of 1–40% buffer B followed by a steeper gradient from 40–80% buffer B in 5 min. Buffer B contained 90/10 acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid, and buffer A consisted of 0.1% formic acid (aq). The mass spectrometer acquired 500 ms full scan TOF-MS data followed by 50ms full scan product ion data in an Information Dependent Acquisition, IDA, mode. Full scan TOFMS data was acquired over the mass range 350–1400, and for product ion ms/ms 80–1400 m/z ions observed in the TOF-MS scan exceeding a threshold of 100 counts and a charge state of +2 to +5 were set to trigger the acquisition of product ion, ms/ms spectra of the resultant 20 most intense ions. The data was acquired and processed using Analyst TF 1.6.1 software (ABSCIEX, Canada).
Bioinformatic Analysis of Proteomic Sequence Data
Database searches were performed against NCBInr database (March 2013 version) to detect possible contamination and on the peptide sequences predicted from the N. brasiliensis transcriptomic data (20,136 entries) using MASCOT search engine v4.0 (Matrix-Science, Boston MA). The parameters used for MALDI-TOF/TOF were: enzyme; trypsin; precursor ion mass tolerance = ±0.8 Da; fixed modifications = methionine oxidation; variable modifications = carbamidomethylation; number of missed cleavages allowed = 2; charges states = +1. The parameters used for LC-TOF/TOF were similar except for the precursor ion mass tolerance = ±0.1 Da and for the charges states = +2, +3. The results from the Mascot searches were validated using the program Scaffold v.4.2.1 (Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR) (28). Peptides and proteins were identified using the Peptide Prophet algorithm (29), using a probability cut-off of 95% (peptides) or 99% probability (proteins), and contained at least two identified peptides (proteins) (30). Proteins containing similar peptides that could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony. A false discovery rate of <0.1% was calculated using protein identifications validated using the Scaffold program (v.4.2.1).
Proteins were classified according to GO categories using the program Blast2Go (31) and Pfam using HMMER v3.1b1 (32) and CD-domain, putative signal peptides and transmembrane domain(s) were predicted using the programs CD-Search tool (33), SignalP (34), and TMHMM (35), respectively. Putative mannose 6-phosphate glycosylation sites were identified using the NetNGlyc server (36).
The similarity analysis was based on the model described by Parkinson and Blaxter (37) using an in-house built script as previously described (38) with the N. americanus predicted proteome (18), the secreted proteome of Heligmosomoides polygyrus adult worms (39) and the secreted proteome of Brugia malayi adult worms (40).
Phylogenetic Analyses
Homologs of Sperm-coating protein (SCP)-like extracellular proteins (SCP/TAPS) and astacins, respectively, were identified from sequence datasets available for species of parasitic nematodes from Clade I-V (41) in the NCBInr database (August 2013 version), as well as in the N. brasiliensis L3 and adult secretomes, the N. americanus predicted proteome (18), and the H. polygyrus adult secretome (39). The signature conserved protein motifs for SCP/TAPS (PF01400) and astacins (PF00188), respectively, were aligned using the MUSCLE software. Best-fit evolutionary models for maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses of SCP superfamily and astacin-peptidase family amino acid sequences were predicted using ProtTest (42). The best-fit model inferred from the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) was used in the amino acid dataset analyses. For each amino acid sequence alignment, ML and Bayesian Inference (BI) trees were derived using MEGA v.5.2 (43) and MrBayes 3.2.2 on XSEDE (44), respectively. The different trees were rooted using the RTVP-1 protein from Homo sapiens (GenBank accession number X91911) and the human astacin-like metallo-endopeptidase (GenBank accession number AAI07128) for the SCP/TAPS and astacin trees, respectively. The ML phylogenetic trees of amino acid sequences for astacins and SCP/TAPS were constructed using the WAG model assuming uniform rates among sites (+G + I; i.e. including gamma, proportion of invariant sites, and +G respectively). For each ML analysis, the bootstrapped confidence interval was based on 1000 replicates. BI analyses alignments were run over 3,000,000 generations (ngen = 3,000,000) with two runs each containing four simultaneous Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains (nchains = 4) and every 100th tree being saved (samplefreq = 6000). The parameters used were as follows: “nst = 6,” “rates = invgamma,” with MCMC left at default settings, “ratepr = fixed” and “burnin = 5000”. Consensus trees were constructed, with “contype = allcompat” nodal support being determined using consensus posterior probabilities. All trees were displayed using FigTree v1.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).
RESULTS
Transcriptomic Database
A transcriptomic database was constructed from 245,874,892 Illumina reads derived from four developmental stages of N. brasiliensis. The initial assembly was filtered using read abundance criteria, where transcripts with at least 10 reads supporting the reconstruction, in at least one of the four developmental stages, were retained. After filtering, a total of 18,426 unigenes producing 39,063 possible isoform transcripts were obtained. These transcripts were used for conceptual translation, resulting in 48,583 ORFs that were annotated. A more detailed analysis of annotation, GO, Pfam EGGNOG, and SignalP analysis will be presented in a future publication, however we noted that a total of 2025 (10%) proteins from the predicted proteome of N. brasiliensis presenting homologies with other nematodes were predicted to have a signal peptide, 10.17% of which were inferred to be astacins and 10.96% were predicted to contain a SCP/TAPS domain (n = 222).
2DE of Adult N. brasiliensis ESP
As an initial analysis of the secretome of N. brasiliensis, adult ESPs were electrofocused using 3–10 linear immobilized pH gradient strips and electrophoresed in NuPAGE 4–12% gels. After silver staining the gel, more than 100 spots could be differentiated, most of them located at a range of 8–216 kDa and a pH range of 4.4–10 (Fig. 1). Fifty-six spots detected in the 2D gel were analyzed by MALDI-TOF/TOF and LC-MS/MS, one of which was discarded as human keratin. Subsequently, the search was performed using the proteome derived from transcriptomic analysis and only two of the spots (spots 10 and 34) were unable to be identified as their individual ion scores were below 38 (p < 0.05). The result of the mass spectrometry analysis is shown in Table I, and a more detailed analysis, including the Pfam analysis, sequence information and annotation with NEMBASE and N. americanus genome is provided in supplemental Table SI.
Fig. 1.
Silver stained analytical 2-DE gel of N. brasiliensis adult excretory/secretory proteins. Numbered circles indicate the spots that were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Annotation of the individual spots can be found in Table I.
Table I. Proteins identified in the 2D-PAGE of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis using MASCOT search engine. Asterisks (*) represent proteins identified by LC-MS/MS. Abbreviations used: NP- number of peptides; SP- signal peptide; TD- transmembrane domain; GS- glycosylation site. Individual ions scores > 38 indicate identity or extensive homology (p < 0.05). ? represents sequences where absence of signal peptide could not be confirmed.
Spot number | Protein Number | Mascot score | MW (exp/theo) | pI (exp/theo) | NP | Blast annotation | Species | SP | TD | GS | Domain |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | m.127459 | 104 | 94.73/42.6 | 4.7/4.69 | 1 | sp P10736 Venom allergen_5.01 | Dolichovespula | Y | N | Y | Double SCP |
2 | m.127468 | 96 | 94.74/47.50 | 4.9/8.95 | 1 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
3* | m.127554 | 1003 | 85.89/49.91 | 5.7/4.91 | 5 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma_secreted_protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | Y | Double SCP |
4 | m.127459 | 114 | 83.15/42.60 | 6/4.69 | 1 | sp P10736 Venom allergen_5.01 | Dolichovespula | Y | N | Y | Double SCP |
5* | m.282979 | 1515 | 80.50/22.10 | 6.35/9.3 | 6 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma_secreted_protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Single SCP |
6* | m.130034 | 980 | 75.50/23.36 | 6.85/9.31 | 9 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma_secreted_protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Single SCP |
7 | m.130034 | 201 | 73.13/23.48 | 7.25/9.31 | 5 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Single SCP |
8 | m.130034 | 136 | 70.85/23.48 | 7.6/9.31 | 3 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Single SCP |
9 | m.130034 | 217 | 70.85/23.48 | 8/9.31 | 3 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Single SCP |
10 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
11 | m.36493 | 91 | 85.89/20.64 | 8.35/9.37 | 2 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | N | Single SCP |
12 | m.210487 | 255 | 77.96/49.81 | 7.9/6.2 | 4 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
13* | m.68479 | 55 | 216.54/19.46 | 9.5/9.74 | 9 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | N | Single SCP |
14 | m.50190 | 91 | 77.96/25.03 | 9.05/9.38 | 2 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
15 | m.50190 | 97 | 64.49/25.03 | 9/9.38 | 2 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
16* | m.210487 | 524 | 53.73/49.81 | 8.05/6.2 | 4 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
17* | m.210487 | 766 | 53.73/49.81 | 8.75/6.2 | 4 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
18 | m.210487 | 125 | 53.73/49.81 | 7.95/6.2 | 2 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
19 | m.210487 | 213 | 53.73/49.81 | 7.6/6.2 | 4 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
20* | m.210487 | 587 | 53.73/49.81 | 7.4/6.2 | 4 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
21* | m.394113 | 463 | 68.65/36.21 | 6/5.01 | 6 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma_secreted_protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Single SCP |
22 | m.280800 | 87 | 70.85/64.96 | 4.45/4.74 | 1 | Acetylcholinesterase 4 | Caenorhabditis | Y | N | Y | Esterase lipase |
23* | m.425554 | 1566 | 47.81/94.55 | 4.5/5.43 | 11 | sp Q18673 Neprilysin-1 | Caenorhabditis | N | Y | Y | Gluzincin superfamily |
24 | m.271310 | 74 | 49.20/49.04 | 6.7/6.95 | 1 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | Y | Double SCP |
25* | m.210487 | 274 | 53.73/49.81 | 6.95/6.2 | 3 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
26 | m.271310 | 81 | 47.81/49.04 | 7.3/6.95 | 2 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | Y | Double SCP |
27* | m.271310 | 888 | 46.46/49.04 | 8/6.95 | 8 | sp Q16937Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | Y | Double SCP |
28 | m.209558 | 188 | 40.47/40.83 | 9.35/8.7 | 3 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | Y | Double SCP |
29* | m.21970 | 1193 | 33.83/95.10 | 8.8/6.6 | 10 | sp O16796 Neprilysin-2 | Caenorhabditis | N | Y | Y | Gluzincin superfamily |
30* | m.161819 | 1467 | 52.16/58.36 | 7.95/8.79 | 16 | sp Q7JLI1 Zinc_metalloproteinase_nas-31 | Caenorhabditis | Y | Y | Y | Astacin |
31 | m.223466 | 97 | 42.73/46.89 | 7/6 | 2 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | Y | Double SCP |
32 | m.285697 | 109 | 43.93/46.27 | 6.6/5.56 | 2 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | N | DUF Superfamily |
33* | m.418883 | 1492 | 33.83/52.11 | 4.95/7.24 | 12 | sp O93428 Cathepsin_D | Chionodraco | N | N | Y | Asp |
34 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
35* | m.55433 | 980 | 33.83/43.33 | 6.6/6.32 | 10 | sp P46563 Fructose-bisphosphate_aldolase_2 | Caenorhabditis | Y | N | N | Aldolase |
36* | m.55433 | 1603 | 33.83/43.33 | 8.75/6.32 | 13 | sp P46563 Fructose-bisphosphate_aldolase_2 | Caenorhabditis | Y | N | N | Aldolase |
37 | Keratin | 508 | 27.01/65.98 | 9.35/8.16 | 7 | – | Homo sapiens | – | – | – | – |
38* | m.127462 | 577 | 27.57/48.65 | 8.35/8.39 | 3 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma_secreted_protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | Y | Double SCP |
39* | m.233248 | 2323 | 23.20/25.54 | 4.5/5.32 | 13 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | N | Single SCP |
40 | m.122208 | 330 | 21.71/28.30 | 4.6/5.05 | 5 | sp Q86KC1 Probable_GH_family_25_lysozime | Dictyostelum | Y | N | GH25_muramidase | |
41 | m.233248 | 223 | 23.20/25.54 | 4.9/5.32 | 5 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | N | Single SCP |
42 | m.233248 | 88 | 23.61/25.54 | 5.25/5.32 | 1 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | N | Single SCP |
43 | m.233248 | 61 | 23.61/25.54 | 5.45/5.32 | 1 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma secreted protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | N | Single SCP |
44 | m.233245 | 163 | 22.06/19.40 | 6.25/7.23 | 4 | sp B2MVK7 Venom_allergen_5 | Rhynchium | Y | N | Y | Single SCP |
45 | m.233245 | 121 | 22.06/19.40 | 6.5/7.23 | 2 | sp B2MVK7 Venom_allergen_5 | Rhynchium | Y | N | Y | Single SCP |
46 | m.233245 | 80 | 22.06/19.40 | 6.7/7.23 | 3 | sp B2MVK7 Venom_allergen_5 | Rhynchium | Y | N | Y | Single SCP |
47* | m.37549 | 1846 | 21.37/21.10 | 7.65/8.05 | 10 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma_secreted_protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | N | Single SCP |
48* | m.233245 | 999 | 52.16/19.40 | 8.75/7.23 | 6 | sp B2MVK7 Venom_allergen_5 | Rhynchium | Y | N | Y | Single SCP |
49* | m.37549 | 1544 | 20.44/21.10 | 8.4/8.05 | 8 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma_secreted_protein | Ancylostoma | ? | N | N | Single SCP |
50 | m.433945 | 90 | 17.83/19.76 | 9.35/9.38 | 2 | Globin | Nippostrongylus | Y | N | Y | Globin |
51* | m.229449 | 782 | 17.30/19.70 | 8.85/6.59 | 3 | sp P51535 Myoglobin | Nippostrongylus | Y | N | N | Globin |
52* | m.417418 | 2990 | 16.83/20.32 | 8.2/6.32 | 6 | sp P48817 Nucleoside_diphosphate_kinase | Nippostrongylus | N | N | N | kinase |
53* | m.229449 | 539 | 17.73/19.70 | 8.05/6.59 | 4 | sp P51535 Myoglobin | Nippostrongylus | Y | N | N | Globin |
54* | m.123267 | 595 | 19.87/22.04 | 6.3/6.9 | 8 | sp Q9NL98 Peroxiredoxin | Ascaris | N | N | N | Thioredoxin |
55* | m.285697 | 2022 | 45.17/46.15 | 6/5.56 | 11 | sp Q16937 Ancylostoma_secreted_protein | Ancylostoma | Y | N | N | DUF Superfamily |
56* | m.211569 | 960 | 42.16/47.10 | 8.75/6.61 | 14 | sp Q27527 Enolase | Caenorhabditis | N | N | Y | Enolase |
The most abundant family of proteins was a subfamily of the CAP-domain Cysteine-rich SCP/TAPS family (PF00188), otherwise termed Venom Allergen/Ancylostoma secreted protein-like (VAL) products (45, 46); no fewer than 37 of the 53 spots identified belonged to this family (namely spots 1–9, 11–21, 24–28, 31, 38–39, and 41–49) and the corresponding protein sequences contained either a single or double CAP domain. The second most highly represented protein family was the globin-like superfamily (PF00042.17), with three spots containing a globin domain (e.g. spots 50, 51, and 53). Other proteins belonging to different families such as peptidases, esterases, kinases or metabolic enzymes were identified and only two spots contained a domain of unknown function (spots 32 and 55). A total of 27 spots contained proteins for which a signal peptide could be identified in the transcriptome assembly, although not all N-terminal amino acid sequences were available for inspection; in addition three spots included proteins with at least one transmembrane domain (Table I). Following NetNGlyc analysis, proteins from 36 spots had at least one putative N-glycosylation site.
Proteomic Analysis of ESP
For a more comprehensive analysis of the secretome, ESP from L3 and adult worms, as well as an adult NEx were fractionated using OGE, and the tryptic peptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS, generating a total of 57,079 and 54,529 spectra for L3 and adults, respectively and 32,878 for NEx. Mascot searches were performed against the predicted proteins from the generated transcriptome, and Scaffold software (v.4.2.1) was used to validate the protein identifications. Using Scaffold, 52 proteins for L3 ESP and 261 and 275 for adult ESP and NEx were identified, respectively, by at least two peptides at a 99.0% probability and an estimated false discovery rate <0.1% (supplemental Tables S2–S7).
The number of shared proteins common to the different developmental stages is shown in Fig. 2A. In addition, a 2D-DIGE comparison of the N. brasiliensis L3 and adult ESP was performed in order to highlight the limited number of shared proteins common to both samples. The results (Fig. 2B) confirm the lack of common proteins in the ESP of these two developmental stages as very few spots overlapped in the gel. A total of 13 proteins were found in both L3 and adult ESP, whereas 102 proteins were shared between adult ESP and adult NEx (Fig. 2A). Only six proteins were found in both L3 ESP and adult NEx. The complete lists of proteins and peptides identified for L3 ESP, adult ESP, and NEx can be found in supplemental Tables S2–S7, respectively.
Fig. 2.
Overlap between L3 and adult excretory/secretory proteins. A, Venn diagram showing the common proteins between L3 ESP, adult ESP, and adult NEx N. brasiliensis. Abbreviations used: ESP- excretory/secretory products from N. brasiliensis; NEx- whole worm extract from N. brasiliensis. B, 2D-DIGE image comparing L3 ESP (green spots) and adult ESP (red spots) from N. brasiliensis.
The proteins identified from L3 and adult stages were annotated using Blast2GO (31). In total, 1244 GO terms were returned from the three categories of the GO database: biological process, molecular function, and cellular component (supplemental Fig. S1). There were 88 and 768 biological process returned terms for L3 and adult ESP fractions respectively, and “metabolic process” and “multicellular organismal process” represented the most frequently predicted category in L3 (19.3% of the total) and adult ESP fractions (12.5%), respectively. Twenty-five (51%) molecular function terms were returned with “catalytic activity” and 97 (43.3%) returned terms with “binding,” both representing the highest terms for L3 and adult ESP respectively. A total of 25 and 252 location terms were returned for the L3 and adult ESP secretomes, with the “cell” location representing the most frequently predicted category in both fractions (44% and 37.6%, respectively) (supplemental Fig. S1). The GO analysis of the ESP returned 30 and 50 molecular function terms for L3 and adult sequences, respectively (supplemental Fig. S1). The most prominent terms in the L3 ESP were peptidase activity, protein binding and hydrolase activity. Similarly, protein binding, ATP binding and hydrolase activity were also key terms in adult ESP, whereas terms related to binding activities including heme binding, iron ion binding and oxygen binding were only prominent in the ESP of adult (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Gene Ontology analysis. Bar graph showing the most abundantly represented gene ontology molecular function terms in excretory/secretory proteins derived from N. brasiliensis L3 A, and adult B.
The L3 and adult ESP proteome fractions were subjected to a Pfam analysis using HMMER v3.1b1 (32) and compared with the corresponding analysis of the transcripts from each stage that contained a signal peptide (Fig. 4). The greatest proportion (eight proteins) of the proteins from L3 belonged to the astacin peptidase family M12A (PF01400) (Fig. 4A), followed by a group of five proteins containing CAP domains (PF00188). In the adult ESP fraction, members of the SCP/TAPS family were the most highly represented (45 proteins), followed by astacin family M12A metallopeptidases (PF01400, 10 proteins) (Fig. 4B). The Pfam analysis of the L3 and adult predicted proteins from N. brasiliensis returned five major protein groups common to both samples, with protein kinase domain-containing proteins and tyrosine kinase proteins as the most highly represented (Fig. 4C, 4D). In contrast, the Pfam analysis of the predicted proteins containing a signal peptide showed a high representation of proteins with immunoglobulin domains, neurotransmitter domains and metallopeptidases in both L3 and adult (Fig. 4E, 4F). In addition, proteins with astacins and SCP/TAPS domains were abundant in the predicted secretome (Fig. 4E, 4F).
Fig. 4.
Pfam analysis. Bar graph showing the most represented protein families (Pfam) in the excretory/secretory proteins of N. brasiliensis L3 A, and adult B, the predicted proteome from L3 C, and adult D, and the predicted proteome containing a signal peptide from L3 E, and adult F. Colored bars represent the families present in more than two panels.
A quantitative measure of protein abundance is the exponential modified protein abundance index (emPAI), from which the 25 highest-scoring L3 ESP, adult ESP, and adult NEx proteins are shown in Fig. 5A–5C respectively. Supplemental Tables SII, SIV, and SVI show the complete list of proteins ranked by the emPAI. The most abundant constituent of the L3 ESP fraction is a metalloproteinase inhibitor (Merops family: I35), which is a tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases (TIMP), although some proteases and peptidases were also abundant in this fraction (Fig 5A). In addition, lysozyme-like proteins (GH family 25 lysozyme 2) were notable in L3 ESP, and also detected in the adult ESP. In the adult ESP, the most abundant proteins were two proteins belonging to the SCP/TAPS family (m.233248 Ancylostoma secreted protein (ASP) and m.68479 ASP) and a transthyretin-like protein (m.436569 transthyretin-like protein 15). Other SCP/TAPS proteins were represented in adult ESP but were less abundant (Fig 5B). For the adult NEx proteome, the highest emPAI-scoring proteins were tropomyosin (m.198775) and actin (m.242612), although other globin-, structural-related proteins and metabolic enzymes were also highly represented (Fig. 5C).
Fig. 5.
Comparison of the protein abundance in the L3 excretory/secretory proteins (ESP), adult ESP and adult adult worm extract (NEx) samples. A, The 50 most abundant proteins in L3 ESP ranked by total spectrum count (left) compared with the same proteins in adult ESP (center) and adult NEx (right). Maximum values are colored in red and minimum in blue. B, The 50 most abundant proteins in adult ESP ranked by total spectrum count (center) compared with the same proteins in L3 ESP (left) and adult NEx (right). The 50 most abundant proteins in adult NEx ranked by total spectrum count (right) compared with the same proteins in L3 ESP (left) and adult ESP (center).
Phylogenetic Analysis
The Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses of astacin and SCP/TAPS amino acid sequence alignments resulted in consensus trees with clades supported by relatively high bootstrap values (ML) and posterior probabilities (pp; BI), respectively (Figs. 6 and 7). For the astacins, the consensus tree consisted of two distinct monophyletic clades, with high bootstrap/pp support (i.e. 100/1.0), both including sequences from N. brasiliensis and N. americanus (Fig. 6). Within one of these clades, sequences from the rat and human hookworms formed paraphyletic clades, with one N. brasiliensis sequence (m72921) grouping to the exclusion of homologs from the free-living nematodes Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis brenneri (Fig. 6. The larger astacin monophyletic clade included sequences from all the remaining taxa included in the analyses, including representatives of the Spirurida (Brugia malayi), Ascaridida (Ascaris suum), Rhabditida (Caenorhabditis elegans, C. briggsae, and Strongyloides stercoralis), and Trichocephalida (Trichinella spiralis) (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Phylogenetic relationships of astacins based on Bayesian Inference (BI). The posterior probability supporting each clade is indicated. The accession numbers of each protein are shown.
Fig. 7.
Phylogenetic relationships of SCP/TAPS proteins based on Bayesian Inference (BI). The posterior probability supporting each clade is indicated. The accession numbers of each protein are shown.
For the SCP/TAPS, the ML/BI consensus tree included one main clade comprising all sequences analyzed to the exclusion of a T. spiralis homolog (Fig. 7). Although sequences from free-living nematodes (i.e. C. elegans and C. remanei), spirurids (i.e. B. malayi), and ascaridids (i.e. A. suum) clustered to the exclusion of most SCP/TAPS from strongylids, a single subclade included a conserved subset of SCP/TAPS from N. americanus and N. brasiliensis (Fig. 7); the latter clustered to the exclusion of other hookworm SCP/TAPS, as well as homologs from H. polygyrus (Fig. 7).
Comparative Analysis of Nematoda ESP
To assess the similarity between N. brasiliensis and N. americanus ESP, a comparative analysis of the sequences based on the methodology described by Parkinson and Blaxter (37), but employing an in-house built script, was performed. A morphologically similar gastrointestinal nematode of rodents (H. polygyrus) and a nonrelated nematode (B. malayi) belonging to clades V and III, respectively (41) were included in order to determine the similarities between different nematodes and N. americanus. The results obtained are shown in Fig. 8. A total of 216 proteins were uniquely homologous to N. brasiliensis ESP, whereas 100 and 27 ESP had unique homology to H. polygyrus and B. malayi respectively. Furthermore, 70 proteins had homology with N. brasiliensis and H. polygyrus proteins, and only one and two proteins were homologous with both N. brasiliensis and B. malayi and with H. polygyrus and B. malayi, respectively. Interestingly, no proteins from N. americanus matched a common homolog in all three nematodes.
Fig. 8.
Similarity analysis. Relationships of ESP from Brugia malayi, Heligmosomoides polygyrus and Nippostrongylus brasiliensis were compared with the ESP predicted from the genome of Necator americanus and displayed in a Simitri plot (37).
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we provide the first proteomic analysis of the two key developmental stages of the rodent hookworm N. brasiliensis, coupled with a high-density transcriptomic profile of this parasite. N. brasiliensis is characterized by a life cycle and morphological features that are very similar to N. americanus, and it has been extensively used as a model for the study of human hookworm infection (4, 7, 9, 47). The analysis of the transcriptome of N. brasiliensis shows that more than two-thirds of the sequences with homology to sequences present in the NEMBASE database had significant similarity to N. americanus genes, which is in accordance with the conserved morphological features and life history of these two strongylid nematodes.
Many of the proteins predicted from the N. brasiliensis transcriptome contain a signal peptide, which is in accordance with findings for other helminths (27, 48); of these putative secreted proteins, a total of 6.27% (127) sequences were identified in the ESP of N. brasiliensis, in line with findings from other parasitic helminths (26, 27, 49, 50). However, some of the proteins (56.2%) detected in ESP did not contain a classical signal peptide, suggesting alternative secretion pathways including the presence of nonclassical secretory signals or release from the parasite via exosomes (51).
The proteins present in the ESP of parasites in general, and nematodes in particular, represent the major interface between the host and the parasite, and contribute directly or indirectly to the survival or the expulsion of the parasite. Furthermore, the parasite needs to adapt to different physiological niches, depending on the developmental stage and its pattern of migration. The infective L3 stage of N. brasiliensis penetrates through the skin and migrates through the vasculature, whereas the adult worm lives in a physiologically distinct niche, the gut. In the present work, we have identified 52 and 261 proteins in the ESP of the larval and adult stages of N. brasiliensis. In addition to this, we have shown that the proteins identified in the ESP are different to those identified in the NEx, suggesting their true secretory origin as opposed to leakage of intracellular and structural proteins from dead or damaged worms.
In our analysis of N. brasiliensis, only eight proteins are detected in ESPs from both larval and adult stages, whereas in other nematodes such as Strongyloides ratti, more than 50% of the proteins identified in the ESP of parasitic adult females and infective larvae are common to both developmental stages. This intriguing finding suggests the need for different proteins as a consequence of adaptation to different niches; N. brasiliensis infective larvae and adult worms occupy distinct anatomical locations in the host, whereas S. ratti L3 can develop in the intestine of the host, cohabiting with adults in the same niche.
From the proteins detected in L3 ESP, two particular proteins were also highly represented in the adult secretome (Fig. 5). Both proteins had homology to GH Family 25 lysozyme 2 (GH 25 muramidase superfamily). This family of proteins has been identified at the transcript level in other hookworms (26) and in the secretome of adult H. polygyrus (39). In addition, in the nematode C. elegans and the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum lysozyme has been reported to exert an antimicrobial and bacteriolytic effect, which is likely to be associated with its expression in both developmental stages (52, 53).
Other proteins that have been identified in both developmental stages include actin, a fatty-acid binding protein, two proteins of unknown function and proteases and other enzymes including cathepsin D, apyrase, acetylcholinesterase, cell death-related nuclease 7, and extracellular superoxide dismutase. Although actin is a cytoskeletal protein, it has been detected in the ESP of different helminths such as Echinostoma caproni or Angiostrongylus cantonensis (54, 55). Recently, parasitic trematodes were shown to secrete extracellular microvesicles that resembled mammalian exosomes (51), and accounts for the secretion of some proteins that lack a signal peptide. Although exosome-like microvesicles have not yet been reported from parasitic nematodes, this phenomenon is entirely plausible and might explain the presence of molecules lacking a signal peptide in the ESP of N. brasiliensis (and most other parasitic helminths). Superoxide dismutase is an anti-oxidative protein and is involved in protection of N. brasiliensis and Ancylostoma ceylanicum against reactive oxygen species from host inflammatory cells (56). Different apyrases have been described also in the related nematode H. polygyrus (57), and they have been related with clot prevention in blood-feeding arthropods and nematodes (39, 58–60) and anti-coagulant. The protein acetylcholinesterase has been extensively described in N. brasiliensis and other nematodes and has a role in the inhibition of secretory responses by hydrolyzing acetylcholine (61) and in the reduction of inflammation (62). The proteins detected in both developmental stages could be of importance in the development of future vaccines and treatments against N. brasiliensis, which could reduce both the infection and the establishment of this nematode.
The most abundant larval stage specific ESPs included a metalloproteinase-inhibitor, a tyrosinase, a superoxide-dismutase and a serine protease inhibitor whereas, in the adult, different ASPs, globin-like proteins, transthyretin-like proteins and vitellogenins were stage-specific. The putative metalloproteinase-inhibitor was by far the most highly represented protein in L3. It shared greatest homology with tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase from N. americanus and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase from A. caninum, and belongs to the MEROPS family I35 (TIMP family). Other TIMPs have been found to be up-regulated in larval stages of N. americanus (63) and the adult stage of A. caninum and A. ceylanicum (64, 65). Furthermore, these proteins are implicated in host-parasite relationships and modulation of the immune response (66). In contrast, the most abundant protein in adult worms was an ASP that shared sequence identity with N. americanus ASP-2. Na-ASP-2 is only expressed by hookworm L3 and not by the adult stages, and has been extensively explored as a vaccine candidate (67, 68).
ESP from both developmental stages were also categorized according to the presence of conserved (Pfam) domains. The most abundantly represented family of proteins in the L3 ESP was the astacin metalloproteases (Peptidase family M12A (PF01400)). In eukaryotes, astacins adopt a range of functions, including the activation of growth factors, degradation of polypeptides, and the processing of extracellular proteins (69). Astacins have been found in other free-living and parasitic nematodes (50, 70–72) including the canine hookworm A. caninum (73); A. caninum L3 secrete an astacin which digests connective tissues upon invasion of the host skin, and the protein has shown potential as a hookworm vaccine (73, 74). S. stercoralis strongylastacin is only expressed by L3, and it is thought to be involved in the invasion process (75). Other astacins such as NAS-36 and NAS-37 from the free-living nematode C. elegans, play important roles in cuticle ecdysis during moulting (71, 76), whereas NAS-36 homologs from the parasitic nematodes H. contortus and B. malayi play important functions in parasite development (77, 78). A phylogenetic analysis of astacins from N. brasiliensis and other nematodes revealed a monophyletic clade formed exclusively by selected sequences from adult N. brasiliensis ESP (i.e. m72921, m440287, and m440290) and homologs from the predicted proteome of N. americanus and the free-living nematode C. brenneri, to the exclusion of sequences from all other nematode species included in the analysis, as well as other hookworm homologs (Fig. 6). The fact that, to the best of our knowledge, some members of the (parasite) astacin family are shared exclusively between N. americanus and N. brasiliensis raises questions about the specific roles that these proteins may play in the biology of these hookworm species, and serves to highlight the biological similarities between the human and the rat hookworm.
In contrast, the most abundant family of proteins in the adult ESP was the SCP/TAPS (PF00188). The abundance of this subfamily of proteins was also confirmed by the 2D gel analysis, where almost 70% of the spots identified presented a single or double CAP motif. We identified more than 30 SCP/TAPS proteins in the ESP of L3 and adult stages from N. brasiliensis, which is in accordance with the diversity of this group of proteins in most nematodes (57), most notably hookworms, where they constitute more than 30% of the adult worm ESP (26, 79). Most of the SCP/TAPS proteins from N. brasiliensis were secreted only by adult worms, and only three proteins were detected from L3 ESP, and one protein (m259086) was common to the ESP of both developmental stages. SCP/TAPS proteins with CAP motifs are generally abundant in helminth secretomes, and while at least two members from parasitic nematodes appear to have immunomodulatory properties (80, 81), relatively little functional information is available despite the recent advances in the structural biology of this protein family (82). Because of the relative ease of genetic manipulation of C. elegans compared with parasitic nematodes, additional functional roles for SCP/TAPS proteins have been identified, including antimicrobial activity, normal body formation and lifespan (83–85), highlighting the extensive array of functions that this intriguing protein family has adopted.
The phylogenetic analysis of SCP/TAPS proteins revealed that, while the vast majority of hookworm SCP/TAPS clustered together with homologs from other parasitic nematodes with varying bootstrap/posterior probabilities support (cf. Fig. 7), a small subset of sequences from the rat and human hookworms formed a separate clade (cf. Fig. 7), thus leading to the hypothesis that, within the SCP/TAPS family, these members might have evolved biological functions specific to N. brasiliensis and N. americanus only, and distinct from their homologous counterparts
To assess the overall sequence similarities between the secretomes of N. brasiliensis and related nematodes, we performed a similarity analysis using ESP from N. brasiliensis, H. polygyrus, B. malayi and N. americanus. This type of analysis plots in a two-dimensional scale the relative similarities of protein sequences between one species (N. americanus) and three comparators as described previously for other nematodes (17, 37). As highlighted in Fig. 8, N. americanus ESP had more homologs in the ESP from N. brasiliensis than from either H. polygyrus or B. malayi. We selected these species as comparators because they can complete their life cycles in rodents and their ESP had been characterized using proteomics techniques (as opposed to predicted using bioinformatics tools). We believe that the sequence identities between the secretomes of N. brasiliensis and N. americanus support the morphological and developmental similarities between these two species, and lends strong support for the use of N. brasiliensis as a model for human hookworm disease (7, 9, 39, 47).
This is the first study that provides an in-depth overview of the proteins secreted by N. brasiliensis, which could be of importance in unraveling the molecular architecture of a complex host-parasite relationship. Our data lends strong molecular support for the use of N. brasiliensis as a robust animal model for human hookworm infection, and reveals groups of proteins that have expanded to play critical roles in the biology of migrating larvae and establishment, feeding, and modulation of immunity by the adult worm in the host gut. The ESP described herein present potential targets for the development of new drugs and vaccines against gastrointestinal nematodes of humans and animals, and might also hold promise as a novel approach to control autoimmune and allergic inflammatory disorders (86) that are increasing at an alarming rate in developed countries.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Author contributions: J.S., G.L., R.M.M., and A.L. designed research; J.S., A.S., Y.H., and D.P. performed research; J.S., A.S., Y.H., T.B., M.C., S.T., M.B., G.L., and R.M.M. contributed new reagents or analytic tools; J.S., A.S., C.C., T.B., P.G., J.M., M.M., M.B., G.L., R.M.M., and A.L. analyzed data; J.S., A.S., C.C., G.L., R.M.M., and A.L. wrote the paper.
* This work was supported by a program grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC), the Wellcome Trust, and the Health Research Council of New Zealand. AL and CC are supported by a NHMRC principal research fellowship and early-career research fellowship, respectively. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
This article contains supplemental Tables S1 to S8 and Fig. S1.
1 The abbreviations used are:
- ESP
- Excretory/secretory products
- BLAST
- Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
- CAP
- Cysteine-rich protein
- Antigen 5
- Pathogenesis-related protein 1 domain
- DTE
- Dithioerythritol
- emPAI
- exponential modified protein abundance index
- GO
- Gene Ontology
- IAM
- Iodoacetamide
- NEx
- whole worm extract
- OGE
- OFF-GEL electrophoresis
- SCP
- Sperm coat protein
- TAPS
- Tpx-1
- Antigen 5
- Pathogenesis-related protein 1, SCP-like
- VAL
- Venome allergen/Ancylostoma secreted protein-Like.
REFERENCES
- 1. Hotez P. J., Brooker S., Bethony J. M., Bottazzi M. E., Loukas A., Xiao S. (2004) Hookworm infection. N. Engl. J. 351, 799–807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hotez P. J., Fenwick A., Savioli L., Molyneux D. H. (2009) Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases. Lancet 373, 1570–1575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. World Health Organization. Global Health Estimates (GHE) 2013: DALYs by age, sex and cause. DALY estimates, 2000–2011. Geneva: World Health Organization, November 2013 [Google Scholar]
- 4. Camberis M., Le Gros G., Urban J., Jr. (2003) Animal model of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis and Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Current protocols in immunology / edited by John E. Coligan. [et al.] Chapter 19, Unit 19 12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ehigiator H. N., Stadnyk A. W., Lee T. D. (2000) Extract of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis stimulates polyclonal type-2 immunoglobulin response by inducing de novo class switch. Infect. Immun. 68, 4913–4922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Holland M. J., Harcus Y. M., Riches P. L., Maizels R. M. (2000) Proteins secreted by the parasitic nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis act as adjuvants for Th2 responses. Eur. J. Immunol. 30, 1977–1987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. McSorley H. J., Loukas A. (2010) The immunology of human hookworm infections. Parasite Immunol. 32, 549–559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. McSorley H. J., Maizels R. M. (2012) Helminth infections and host immune regulation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 25, 585–608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ohnmacht C., Voehringer D. (2010) Basophils protect against reinfection with hookworms independently of mast cells and memory Th2 cells. J. Immunol. 184, 344–350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Conrad D. H., Ben-Sasson S. Z., Le Gros G., Finkelman F. D., Paul W. E. (1990) Infection with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis or injection of anti-IgD antibodies markedly enhances Fc-receptor-mediated interleukin 4 production by non-B, non-T cells. J. Exp. Med. 171, 1497–1508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Harvie M., Camberis M., Le Gros G. (2013) Development of CD4 T cell dependent immunity against N. brasiliensis infection. Front. Immunol. 4, 74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Harvie M., Camberis M., Tang S. C., Delahunt B., Paul W., Le Gros G. (2010) The lung is an important site for priming CD4 T-cell-mediated protective immunity against gastrointestinal helminth parasites. Infect. Immun. 78, 3753–3762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kopf M., Le Gros G., Bachmann M., Lamers M. C., Bluethmann H., Kohler G. (1993) Disruption of the murine IL-4 gene blocks Th2 cytokine responses. Nature 362, 245–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lebrun P., Spiegelberg H. L. (1987) Concomitant immunoglobulin E and immunoglobulin G1 formation in Nippostrongylus brasiliensis-infected mice. J. Immunol. 139, 1459–1465 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Neill D. R., Wong S. H., Bellosi A., Flynn R. J., Daly M., Langford T. K., Bucks C., Kane C. M., Fallon P. G., Pannell R., Jolin H. E., McKenzie A. N. (2010) Nuocytes represent a new innate effector leukocyte that mediates type-2 immunity. Nature 464, 1367–1370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Shin E. H., Osada Y., Chai J. Y., Matsumoto N., Takatsu K., Kojima S. (1997) Protective roles of eosinophils in Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infection. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 114, 45–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Harcus Y. M., Parkinson J., Fernandez C., Daub J., Selkirk M. E., Blaxter M. L., Maizels R. M. (2004) Signal sequence analysis of expressed sequence tags from the nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis and the evolution of secreted proteins in parasites. Genome Biol. 5, R39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tang Y. T., Gao X., Rosa B. A., Abubucker S., Hallsworth-Pepin K., Martin J., Tyagi R., Heizer E., Zhang X., Bhonagiri-Palsikar V., Minx P., Warren W. C., Wang Q., Zhan B., Hotez P. J., Sternberg P. W., Dougall A., Gaze S. T., Mulvenna J., Sotillo J., Ranganathan S., Rabelo E. M., Wilson R. K., Felgner P. L., Bethony J., Hawdon J. M., Gasser R. B., Loukas A., Mitreva M. (2014) Genome of the human hookworm Necator americanus. Nat. Genet. 10.1038/ng.2875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lawrence R. A., Gray C. A., Osborne J., Maizels R. M. (1996) Nippostrongylus brasiliensis: cytokine responses and nematode expulsion in normal and IL-4-deficient mice. Exp. Parasitol. 84, 65–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Grabherr M. G., Haas B. J., Yassour M., Levin J. Z., Thompson D. A., Amit I., Adiconis X., Fan L., Raychowdhury R., Zeng Q., Chen Z., Mauceli E., Hacohen N., Gnirke A., Rhind N., di Palma F., Birren B. W., Nusbaum C., Lindblad-Toh K., Friedman N., Regev A. (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Haas B. J., Papanicolaou A., Yassour M., Grabherr M., Blood P. D., Bowden J., Couger M. B., Eccles D., Li B., Lieber M., Macmanes M. D., Ott M., Orvis J., Pochet N., Strozzi F., Weeks N., Westerman R., William T., Dewey C. N., Henschel R., Leduc R. D., Friedman N., Regev A. (2013) De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Healer J., Ashall F., Maizels R. M. (1991) Characterization of proteolytic enzymes from larval and adult Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Parasitology 103, 305–314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hewitson J. P., Harcus Y. M., Curwen R. S., Dowle A. A., Atmadja A. K., Ashton P. D., Wilson A., Maizels R. M. (2008) The secretome of the filarial parasite, Brugia malayi: proteomic profile of adult excretory-secretory products. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 160, 8–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Sotillo J., Valero L., Sanchez Del Pino M. M., Fried B., Esteban J. G., Marcilla A., Toledo R. (2008) Identification of antigenic proteins from Echinostoma caproni (Trematoda) recognized by mouse immunoglobulins M, A, and G using an immunoproteomic approach. Parasite Immunol. 30, 271–279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yan J. X., Wait R., Berkelman T., Harry R. A., Westbrook J. A., Wheeler C. H., Dunn M. J. (2000) A modified silver staining protocol for visualization of proteins compatible with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 21, 3666–3672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Mulvenna J., Hamilton B., Nagaraj S. H., Smyth D., Loukas A., Gorman J. J. (2009) Proteomics analysis of the excretory/secretory component of the blood-feeding stage of the hookworm, Ancylostoma caninum. Mol. Cell Proteomics 8, 109–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Cantacessi C., Mulvenna J., Young N. D., Kasny M., Horak P., Aziz A., Hofmann A., Loukas A., Gasser R. B. (2012) A deep exploration of the transcriptome and “excretory/secretory” proteome of adult Fascioloides magna. Mol. Cell Proteomics 11, 1340–1353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Searle B. C. (2010) Scaffold: a bioinformatic tool for validating MS/MS-based proteomic studies. Proteomics 10, 1265–1269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A. I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. (2002) Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Nesvizhskii A. I., Keller A., Kolker E., Aebersold R. (2003) A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646–4658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Conesa A., Gotz S., Garcia-Gomez J. M., Terol J., Talon M., Robles M. (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization, and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21, 3674–3676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Finn R. D., Clements J., Eddy S. R. (2011) HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W29–W37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Marchler-Bauer A., Lu S., Anderson J. B., Chitsaz F., Derbyshire M. K., DeWeese-Scott C., Fong J. H., Geer L. Y., Geer R. C., Gonzales N. R., Gwadz M., Hurwitz D. I., Jackson J. D., Ke Z., Lanczycki C. J., Lu F., Marchler G. H., Mullokandov M., Omelchenko M. V., Robertson C. L., Song J. S., Thanki N., Yamashita R. A., Zhang D., Zhang N., Zheng C., Bryant S. H. (2011) CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D225–D229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Emanuelsson O., Brunak S., von Heijne G., Nielsen H. (2007) Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP, and related tools. Nat. Protoc. 2, 953–971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Krogh A., Larsson B., von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E. L. (2001) Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 567–580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Blom N., Sicheritz-Ponten T., Gupta R., Gammeltoft S., Brunak S. (2004) Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics 4, 1633–1649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Parkinson J., Blaxter M. (2003) SimiTri - visualizing similarity relationships for groups of sequences. Bioinformatics 19, 390–395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Cantacessi C., Mitreva M., Jex A. R., Young N. D., Campbell B. E., Hall R. S., Doyle M. A., Ralph S. A., Rabelo E. M., Ranganathan S., Sternberg P. W., Loukas A., Gasser R. B. (2010) Massively parallel sequencing and analysis of the Necator americanus transcriptome. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4, e684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hewitson J. P., Harcus Y., Murray J., van Agtmaal M., Filbey K. J., Grainger J. R., Bridgett S., Blaxter M. L., Ashton P. D., Ashford D. A., Curwen R. S., Wilson R. A., Dowle A. A., Maizels R. M. (2011) Proteomic analysis of secretory products from the model gastrointestinal nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus reveals dominance of venom allergen-like (VAL) proteins. J. Proteomics 74, 1573–1594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bennuru S., Semnani R., Meng Z., Ribeiro J. M., Veenstra T. D., Nutman T. B. (2009) Brugia malayi excreted/secreted proteins at the host/parasite interface: stage- and gender-specific proteomic profiling. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Blaxter M. L., De Ley P., Garey J. R., Liu L. X., Scheldeman P., Vierstraete A., Vanfleteren J. R., Mackey L. Y., Dorris M., Frisse L. M., Vida J. T., Thomas W. K. (1998) A molecular evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda. Nature 392, 71–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Abascal F., Zardoya R., Posada D. (2005) ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21, 2104–2105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Miller M. A., Pfeiffer W., Schwartz T. “Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees” in Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA pp 1–8, 8 [Google Scholar]
- 45. Hawdon J. M., Jones B. F., Hoffman D. R., Hotez P. J. (1996) Cloning and characterization of Ancylostoma-secreted protein. A novel protein associated with the transition to parasitism by infective hookworm larvae. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6672–6678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Murray J., Gregory W. F., Gomez-Escobar N., Atmadja A. K., Maizels R. M. (2001) Expression and immune recognition of Brugia malayi VAL-1, a homolog of vespid venom allergens and Ancylostoma secreted proteins. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 118, 89–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Reece J. J., Siracusa M. C., Southard T. L., Brayton C. F., Urban J. F., Jr., Scott A. L. (2008) Hookworm-induced persistent changes to the immunological environment of the lung. Infect. Immun. 76, 3511–3524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Young N. D., Jex A. R., Cantacessi C., Hall R. S., Campbell B. E., Spithill T. W., Tangkawattana S., Tangkawattana P., Laha T., Gasser R. B. (2011) A portrait of the transcriptome of the neglected trematode, Fasciola gigantica - biological and biotechnological implications. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5, e1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Garg G., Bernal D., Trelis M., Forment J., Ortiz J., Valero M. L., Pedrola L., Martinez-Blanch J., Esteban J. G., Ranganathan S., Toledo R., Marcilla A. (2013) The transcriptome of Echinostoma caproni adults: further characterization of the secretome and identification of new potential drug targets. J. Proteomics 89, 202–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Soblik H., Younis A. E., Mitreva M., Renard B. Y., Kirchner M., Geisinger F., Steen H., Brattig N. W. (2011) Life cycle stage-resolved proteomic analysis of the excretome/secretome from Strongyloides ratti - identification of stage-specific proteases. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10, M111 010157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Marcilla A., Trelis M., Cortes A., Sotillo J., Cantalapiedra F., Minguez M. T., Valero M. L., Sanchez del Pino M. M., Munoz-Antoli C., Toledo R., Bernal D. (2012) Extracellular vesicles from parasitic helminths contain specific excretory/secretory proteins and are internalized in intestinal host cells. PLoS One 7, e45974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Boehnisch C., Wong D., Habig M., Isermann K., Michiels N. K., Roeder T., May R. C., Schulenburg H. (2011) Protist-type lysozymes of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans contribute to resistance against pathogenic Bacillus thuringiensis. PLoS One 6, e24619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Eichinger L., Pachebat J. A., Glockner G., Rajandream M. A., Sucgang R., Berriman M., Song J., Olsen R., Szafranski K., Xu Q., Tunggal B., Kummerfeld S., Madera M., Konfortov B. A., Rivero F., Bankier A. T., Lehmann R., Hamlin N., Davies R., Gaudet P., Fey P., Pilcher K., Chen G., Saunders D., Sodergren E., Davis P., Kerhornou A., Nie X., Hall N., Anjard C., Hemphill L., Bason N., Farbrother P., Desany B., Just E., Morio T., Rost R., Churcher C., Cooper J., Haydock S., van Driessche N., Cronin A., Goodhead I., Muzny D., Mourier T., Pain A., Lu M., Harper D., Lindsay R., Hauser H., James K., Quiles M., Madan Babu M., Saito T., Buchrieser C., Wardroper A., Felder M., Thangavelu M., Johnson D., Knights A., Loulseged H., Mungall K., Oliver K., Price C., Quail M. A., Urushihara H., Hernandez J., Rabbinowitsch E., Steffen D., Sanders M., Ma J., Kohara Y., Sharp S., Simmonds M., Spiegler S., Tivey A., Sugano S., White B., Walker D., Woodward J., Winckler T., Tanaka Y., Shaulsky G., Schleicher M., Weinstock G., Rosenthal A., Cox E. C., Chisholm R. L., Gibbs R., Loomis W. F., Platzer M., Kay R. R., Williams J., Dear P. H., Noegel A. A., Barrell B., Kuspa A. (2005) The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature 435, 43–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Morassutti A. L., Levert K., Pinto P. M., da Silva A. J., Wilkins P., Graeff-Teixeira C. (2012) Characterization of Angiostrongylus cantonensis excretory-secretory proteins as potential diagnostic targets. Exp. Parasitol. 130, 26–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Sotillo J., Valero M. L., Sanchez Del Pino M. M., Fried B., Esteban J. G., Marcilla A., Toledo R. (2010) Excretory/secretory proteome of the adult stage of Echinostoma caproni. Parasitol. Res. 107, 691–697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Batra S., Singh S. P., Gupta S., Katiyar J. C., Srivastava V. M. (1990) Reactive oxygen intermediates metabolizing enzymes in Ancylostoma ceylanicum and Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 8, 271–274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Hewitson J. P., Ivens A. C., Harcus Y., Filbey K. J., McSorley H. J., Murray J., Bridgett S., Ashford D., Dowle A. A., Maizels R. M. (2013) Secretion of protective antigens by tissue-stage nematode larvae revealed by proteomic analysis and vaccination-induced sterile immunity. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Nisbet A. J., Zarlenga D. S., Knox D. P., Meikle L. I., Wildblood L. A., Matthews J. B. (2011) A calcium-activated apyrase from Teladorsagia circumcincta: an excretory/secretory antigen capable of modulating host immune responses? Parasite Immunol. 33, 236–243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Valenzuela J. G., Charlab R., Galperin M. Y., Ribeiro J. M. (1998) Purification, cloning, and expression of an apyrase from the bed bug Cimex lectularius. A new type of nucleotide-binding enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30583–30590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Zarlenga D. S., Nisbet A. J., Gasbarre L. C., Garrett W. M. (2011) A calcium-activated nucleotidase secreted from Ostertagia ostertagi 4th-stage larvae is a member of the novel salivary apyrases present in blood-feeding arthropods. Parasitology 138, 333–343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Hussein A. S., Chacon M. R., Smith A. M., Tosado-Acevedo R., Selkirk M. E. (1999) Cloning, expression, and properties of a nonneuronal secreted acetylcholinesterase from the parasitic nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 9312–9319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Lee D. L. (1996) Why do some nematode parasites of the alimentary tract secrete acetylcholinesterase? Int. J. Parasitol. 26, 499–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Cantacessi C., Hofmann A., Pickering D., Navarro S., Mitreva M., Loukas A. (2013) TIMPs of parasitic helminths - a large-scale analysis of high-throughput sequence datasets. Parasit. Vectors 6, 156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Mitreva M., McCarter J. P., Arasu P., Hawdon J., Martin J., Dante M., Wylie T., Xu J., Stajich J. E., Kapulkin W., Clifton S. W., Waterston R. H., Wilson R. K. (2005) Investigating hookworm genomes by comparative analysis of two Ancylostoma species. BMC Genomics 6, 58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Zhan B., Badamchian M., Meihua B., Ashcom J., Feng J., Hawdon J., Shuhua X., Hotez P. J. (2002) Molecular cloning and purification of Ac-TMP, a developmentally regulated putative tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease released in relative abundance by adult Ancylostoma hookworms. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 66, 238–244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Cuellar C., Wu W., Mendez S. (2009) The hookworm tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases (Ac-TMP-1) modifies dendritic cell function and induces generation of CD4 and CD8 suppressor T cells. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Bower M. A., Constant S. L., Mendez S. (2008) Necator americanus: the Na-ASP-2 protein secreted by the infective larvae induces neutrophil recruitment in vivo and in vitro. Exp. Parasitol. 118, 569–575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Diemert D. J., Pinto A. G., Freire J., Jariwala A., Santiago H., Hamilton R. G., Periago M. V., Loukas A., Tribolet L., Mulvenna J., Correa-Oliveira R., Hotez P. J., Bethony J. M. (2012) Generalized urticaria induced by the Na-ASP-2 hookworm vaccine: implications for the development of vaccines against helminths. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 130, 169–176 e166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Bond J. S., Beynon R. J. (1995) The astacin family of metalloendopeptidases. Protein Sci. 4, 1247–1261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Baska P., Wisniewski M., Krzyzowska M., Dlugosz E., Zygner W., Gorski P., Wedrychowicz H. (2013) Molecular cloning and characterisation of in vitro immune response against astacin-like metalloprotease Ace-MTP-2 from Ancylostoma ceylanicum. Exp. Parasitol. 133, 472–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Stepek G., McCormack G., Birnie A. J., Page A. P. (2011) The astacin metalloprotease moulting enzyme NAS-36 is required for normal cuticle ecdysis in free-living and parasitic nematodes. Parasitology. 138, 237–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Varatharajalu R., Parandaman V., Ndao M., Andersen J. F., Neva F. A. (2011) Strongyloides stercoralis excretory/secretory protein strongylastacin specifically recognized by IgE antibodies in infected human sera. Microbiol. Immunol. 55, 115–122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Williamson A. L., Lustigman S., Oksov Y., Deumic V., Plieskatt J., Mendez S., Zhan B., Bottazzi M. E., Hotez P. J., Loukas A. (2006) Ancylostoma caninum MTP-1, an astacin-like metalloprotease secreted by infective hookworm larvae, is involved in tissue migration. Infect. Immun. 74, 961–967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Hotez P. J., Ashcom J., Zhan B., Bethony J., Loukas A., Hawdon J., Wang Y., Jin Q., Jones K. C., Dobardzic A., Dobardzic R., Bolden J., Essiet I., Brandt W., Russell P. K., Zook B. C., Howard B., Chacon M. (2003) Effect of vaccination with a recombinant fusion protein encoding an astacinlike metalloprotease (MTP-1) secreted by host-stimulated Ancylostoma caninum third-stage infective larvae. J. Parasitol. 89, 853–855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Gomez Gallego S., Loukas A., Slade R. W., Neva F. A., Varatharajalu R., Nutman T. B., Brindley P. J. (2005) Identification of an astacin-like metallo-proteinase transcript from the infective larvae of Strongyloides stercoralis. Parasitol. Int. 54, 123–133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Davis M. W., Birnie A. J., Chan A. C., Page A. P., Jorgensen E. M. (2004) A conserved metalloprotease mediates ecdysis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 131, 6001–6008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Gamble H. R., Fetterer R. H., Mansfield L. S. (1996) Developmentally regulated zinc metalloproteinases from third- and fourth-stage larvae of the ovine nematode Haemonchus contortus. J. Parasitol. 82, 197–202 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Guiliano D. B., Hong X., McKerrow J. H., Blaxter M. L., Oksov Y., Liu J., Ghedin E., Lustigman S. (2004) A gene family of cathepsin L-like proteases of filarial nematodes are associated with larval molting and cuticle and eggshell remodeling. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 136, 227–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Cantacessi C., Campbell B. E., Visser A., Geldhof P., Nolan M. J., Nisbet A. J., Matthews J. B., Loukas A., Hofmann A., Otranto D., Sternberg P. W., Gasser R. B. (2009) A portrait of the ”SCP/TAPS“ proteins of eukaryotes - developing a framework for fundamental research and biotechnological outcomes. Biotechnol. Adv. 27, 376–388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. He Y., Barker S. J., MacDonald A. J., Yu Y., Cao L., Li J., Parhar R., Heck S., Hartmann S., Golenbock D. T., Jiang S., Libri N. A., Semper A. E., Rosenberg W. M., Lustigman S. (2009) Recombinant Ov-ASP-1, a Th1-biased protein adjuvant derived from the helminth Onchocerca volvulus, can directly bind and activate antigen-presenting cells. J. Immunol. 182, 4005–4016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Moyle M., Foster D. L., McGrath D. E., Brown S. M., Laroche Y., De Meutter J., Stanssens P., Bogowitz C. A., Fried V. A., Ely J. A., Soule H. R., Vlasuk G. P. (1994) A hookworm glycoprotein that inhibits neutrophil function is a ligand of the integrin CD11b/CD18. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10008–10015 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Osman A., Wang C. K., Winter A., Loukas A., Tribolet L., Gasser R. B., Hofmann A. (2012) Hookworm SCP/TAPS protein structure - A key to understanding host-parasite interactions and developing new interventions. Biotechnol. Adv. 30, 652–657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. O'Rourke D., Baban D., Demidova M., Mott R., Hodgkin J. (2006) Genomic clusters, putative pathogen recognition molecules, and antimicrobial genes are induced by infection of C. elegans with M. nematophilum. Genome Res. 16, 1005–1016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Ookuma S., Fukuda M., Nishida E. (2003) Identification of a DAF-16 transcriptional target gene, scl-1, that regulates longevity and stress resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 13, 427–431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Wang J., Kim S. K. (2003) Global analysis of dauer gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 130, 1621–1634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Navarro S., Ferreira I., Loukas A. (2013) The hookworm pharmacopoeia for inflammatory diseases. Int. J. Parasitol. 43, 225–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.