Abstract
In several recent studies transmissible prion disease was induced in animals by inoculation with recombinant prion protein amyloid fibrils produced in vitro. Serial transmission of amyloid fibrils gave rise to a new class of prion strains of synthetic origin. Gradual transformation of disease phenotypes and PrPSc properties was observed during serial transmission of synthetic prions, a process that resembled the phenomenon of prion strain adaptation. The current article discusses the remarkable parallels between phenomena of prion strain adaptation that accompanies cross-species transmission and the evolution of synthetic prions occurring within the same host. Two alternative mechanisms underlying prion strain adaptation and synthetic strain evolution are discussed. The current article highlights the complexity of the prion transmission barrier and strain adaptation and proposes that the phenomenon of prion adaptation is more common than previously thought.
Keywords: prion protein, prion diseases, synthetic prions, strain adaptation, species barrier, deformed templating mechanism, neurodegenerative diseases
When prions are transmitted between species, the transmission success is often significantly lower than serial transmission within the same host due to a species barrier.1 Species barrier manifestations are a low attack rate and long incubation time to clinical disease or lack of clinical disease in the initial passages.2,3 To a large extent, the species barrier is attributed to differences in amino acid sequence between host PrPC and donor PrPSc 4–6 and has also been referred to as a ‘sequence barrier’7. However, even for strains originating from the same species, the extent of a barrier largely depends on the strain-specific conformation of PrPSc. As such, it would be more appropriate to refer to the “species barrier” as a “structure-sequence barrier.” While “structure-sequence barrier” explains why some strain-specific structures are less compatible with the PrPC sequence of a new host than others, this concept cannot account for some puzzling observations. For instance, transmission of variant Creutzfeld-Jakob disease prions from a human to transgenic mice that express human PrPC exhibited a significant barrier, whereas transmission of the same prions to wild type mice showed little barrier if any.8,9 It is tempting to speculate that the barrier between two species, both of which express PrPC of identical amino acid sequences, could be due to species-specific cellular cofactors and/or species-specific PrPC glycosyl composition. Indeed, in resent studies, cellular co-factors and, in particular, lipids were found to be involved in maintaining infectious prion conformations and controlling strain-specific features.10,11 If the species barrier, at least under some circumstances, is attributable to changes in species-specific cofactors or differences in cellular environment, it should be referred to as a “cofactor barrier.”
Regardless of the molecular mechanisms underlying species barriers, prions are able to gradually adapt to a new host when serially transmitted within the same species following cross-species transmission. The most widely acknowledged manifestations of strain adaptation are an increase in attack rate and a decrease in incubation time to disease. A phenomenon similar to prion strain adaptation was also described in studies where transmissible prion diseases were initiated in animals by inoculating amyloid fibrils generated in vitro from recombinant PrP12-15 (Table 1). In several independent studies conducted on mice or Syrian hamsters, rPrP fibrils gave rise to prions strains that will be referred to as strains of synthetic origin.14,16-20 Despite the fact that synthetic prions were transmitted within the same species, multiple serial passages were required to stabilize the disease phenotypes.15,17,21,22 In a manner similar to adaptation of prions of natural origin, the attack rate increased while the incubation time to disease shortened in the course of serial transmission of synthetic prions.12-15,17,19,21,23 In addition, physical properties of PrPSc such as conformational stability as well as neuropathological features including neurotropism and PrPSc deposition patterns underwent gradual transformation during serial transmission.12-15,17,21,23 Moreover, during the initial passages of synthetic prions a dissociation between accumulation of PK-resistant forms of PrPSc and progression of clinical disease was observed.18,21 Previously dissociation between PrPSc and clinical disease was found to accompany cross-species prion transmission, for example, transmission of BSE to mice.24
Table 1. Common features observed during serial transmission of strains of synthetic origin and cross-species transmission of strain of natural origin.
Cross-species transmission | Transmission of synthetic strains | |
---|---|---|
Shortening of the incubation time | 3, 45–48 | 12-15, 17, 19, 21, 23 |
Change in neurotropism and PrPSc deposition pattern | 49 | 21 |
Change in PrPSc physical properties | 50 | 12–15, 17, 23 |
Dissociation between clinical disease and accumulation of PK-resistant PrPSc | 24 | 18, 21 |
Strain breakdown | 45, 46, 51, 52 | 21 |
The aforementioned observations are typical manifestation of prion strain adaptation to a new host (Table 1). These similarities suggest that the mechanisms that account for adaptation of strains of natural origin to a new host and evolution of strains of synthetic origin might be the same or very similar. Because serial transmissions of synthetic prions were conducted within the same host, long incubation time to disease and low initial attack rate could not be attributed to a “sequence barrier.” Recent studies revealed that PrP folding patterns within amyloid fibrils produced in vitro using rPrP were significantly different from patterns that PrP adapt within PrPSc.25,26 These structural differences could be due to lack of posttranslational modifications in rPrP found in PrPC. It is likely that posttranslational modifications limit the subset of self-replicating states accessible to PrPC creating a barrier for recruiting and converting PrPC.27 If this is true, synthetic strain adaptation should be attributable to transformation of rPrP amyloid structures to PrPSc-like structures accessible for PrPC. In addition, synthetic strain adaptation could also be attributed to evolution of co-factor dependency, i.e., a transformation of co-factor independent rPrP amyloid structures to PrPSc-like structures that rely on cellular co-factors.
While the evolution of synthetic strains exhibits remarkable parallels with prion strain adaptation, there are some differences between the two processes. For instance, following cross-species intracerebral inoculations prions replicate more effectively in lymphoid tissues than in brain.28 In opposition to the high permissiveness of lymphoid tissues to cross-species prion invasion, lymphotropism of synthetic strains appears to emerge slowly or at later stages, i.e., after more than one serial passages.21 However, the evolution of synthetic strain lymphotropism has not yet been fully explored, and the initial lack of lymphotropism could be attributed to intracerebral inoculation route.
What are the molecular mechanisms behind natural and synthetic strain adaptation? According to the “cloud” hypothesis, pools of PrPSc within individual strains are intrinsically heterogeneous.29 The heterogeneity presumably arises due to spontaneous ‘mutations’ or variations in PrPSc structure.29,30 Upon cross-species transmission, minor PrPSc variants that are the most compatible with the amino acid sequence of the new host PrPC and best fitted to replicate in a new environment receive selective advantage. An alternative to the “cloud” hypothesis is a deformed templating model. Contrary to “cloud” hypothesis, which proposes that “new” variants are selected from pre-existing cloud of variants, deformed templating model postulates that changes in replication environment including cross-species transmission play an active role in generating new PrPSc variants 31,32. According to this model, under circumstances where the strain-specific PrPSc template is not compatible with the new replication environment or the amino acid sequence of a new host PrPC, a range of new PrPSc variants are generated via deformed templating with the help of PrPSc seeds. While the majority of newly generated variants might not be effective in replicating either, a variant that fits well to the environment or is compatible with the PrPC sequence of the new host will eventually emerge through multiple trial and error seeding events. Both models, however, propose that changes in replication environment are important for selecting the variants (either pre-existing or generated de novo) that fit the best to the new environment.31,32
The “cloud” hypothesis does not clearly specify the origin of minor PrPSc variants and assumes that structural variations might arise spontaneously. In contrast to the “cloud” hypothesis, deformed templating proposes that changes in the replication environment play an active role in boosting conformational diversity of the PrPSc pool. In direct support of the deformed templating model, experiments on fibrillation of mouse rPrP seeded with amyloid fibrils made using hamster rPrP revealed a switching in the PrP folding pattern within individual fibrils.33 The change in folding pattern occurred only in those cross-seeded reactions, in which the folding pattern of hamster seeds was not compatible with the amino acid sequence of a mouse substrate.33,34 Remarkably, the hybrid fibrils produced as a result of cross-seeding were composed of hamster and mouse rPrP with two distinct cross-β structures.26,33 Other studies demonstrated that changes in prion replication environment and, specifically, adaptation of hamster strains 263K and Hyper to RNA-depleted brain homogenate and then re-adaptation to brain homogenate containing RNA in PMCA resulted in stable transformation of PrPSc physical properties.35 Remarkably, the newly emerged PrPSc variants were not present in the original 263K or Hyper brain-derived materials, but emerged de novo as a result of changes in replication environment. These studies provided a direct illustration that a change in replication environment, whether it is a change in the amino acid sequence of a substrate or in the biochemical environment, resulted in an emergence of new self-replicating states that were absent in the original pools of seeding material.
The remarkable ability of prions to adapt to new cellular environments is highlighted in recent studies on drug resistance. In the presence of carefully selected replication inhibitors, prions were found to gradually acquire drug resistance.30,36-39 Currently, it is unclear whether drug resistance develops as a result of selective amplification of pre-existing minor variants as proposed by the ‘cloud’ hypothesis, or drug-resistant PrPSc variants evolved de novo as postulated by deformed templating mechanism. While prions can acquire resistance to a diverse range of compounds, it is difficult to imagine that conformational heterogeneity of a “cloud” is boundless, i.e., a “cloud” consists of unlimited number of minor variants that fit well to replicate in any and every circumstance including diverse cellular environments or in the presence of chemical inhibitors. The mechanism where a novel PrPSc conformation can emerge de novo helps to explain the remarkable potential of prions for adapting to diverse new environments.
The “cloud” and deformed templating hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. The deformed templating does not exclude structural heterogeneity of PrPSc pools of natural or synthetic origin, but provides a mechanism by which conformational members of a “cloud” undergo structural alterations in a new environment and give a rise to a new “cloud.” It is not entirely clear what are the driving forces behind diversifying events and the frequency or rate of diversifying events under constant replication environment. The “cloud” hypothesis assumes that conformational diversity of a cloud is due to spontaneous ‘mutations’ that occur continuously at low rates.
When amplified in cultured cells or using different PMCA formats, prion properties were found to undergo gradual changes in a manner that appears similar to prion adaptation.30,36,40-42 For example, adding the glycosylation inhibitor swainsonin to cultured cells led to the gradual transformation of prion populations.30,42,43 In the course of serial amplification in PMCA, the strain-specific amplification rate increased gradually,41 and strain-specific secondary structure monitored by FTIR also underwent gradual changes.44 If partially deglycosylated PrPC was used as a substrate in PMCA, strain-specific proteinase K resistance profiles showed significant transformation.40 However, when tested in animal bioassay the changes in PrPSc properties acquired upon replication in PMCA or in cultured cells were often found to be reversible and, most importantly, did not lead to stable changes in disease phenotype.40-43 While PrPSc transformations in diverse cellular or biochemical environments are indicative of the dynamic nature of prions, they should not be confused with actual strain adaptation. Instead, it is worthwhile to compare this phenomenon to a norm of reaction, a concept that describes phenotypic variations of a single genotype across a range of environments. The concepts of norm of reaction and phenotypic plasticity were introduced into population genetics to describe variations in phenotype and the ability of an organism to change its phenotype, respectively, in response to changes in the environment. For instance, plants can acquire multiple morphologically distinct phenotypes within a single genotype to fit into a diverse range of environments. Noteworthy, phenotypic plasticity is not attributed to mutations but to an intrinsic norm of reaction. A concept analogous to norm of reaction could be useful for describing reversible changes in PrPSc features observed across diverse replication environments, such as different cultured cells and PMCA formats that do not lead to stable changes in disease phenotype or characteristics that define strain-ness.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grant NS045585 to I.V.B.
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- PrPC
normal cellular isoform of the prion protein
- PrPSc
abnormal, disease-associated isoform of the prion protein
- PrP
prion protein
- rPrP
recombinant PrP
- PMCA
Protein misfolding cyclic amplification
Published Online: 02/11/2014
References
- 1.Pattison IH. The relative susceptibility of sheep, goats and mice to two types of the goat scrapie agent. Res Vet Sci. 1966;7:207–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hill AF, Joiner S, Linehan J, Desbruslais M, Lantos PL, Collinge J. Species-barrier-independent prion replication in apparently resistant species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:10248–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.18.10248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Race R, Raines A, Raymond GJ, Caughey B, Chesebro B. Long-term subclinical carrier state precedes scrapie replication and adaptation in a resistant species: analogies to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans. J Virol. 2001;75:10106–12. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.21.10106-10112.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Prusiner SB, Scott M, Foster D, Pan KM, Groth D, Mirenda C, Torchia M, Yang SL, Serban D, Carlson GA, et al. Transgenetic studies implicate interactions between homologous PrP isoforms in scrapie prion replication. Cell. 1990;63:673–86. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90134-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bartz JC, McKenzie DI, Bessen RA, Marsh RF, Aiken JM. Transmissible mink encephalopathy species barrier effect between ferret and mink: PrP gene and protein analysis. J Gen Virol. 1994;75:2947–53. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-75-11-2947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Scott M, Foster D, Mirenda C, Serban D, Coufal F, Wälchli M, Torchia M, Groth D, Carlson G, DeArmond SJ, et al. Transgenic mice expressing hamster prion protein produce species-specific scrapie infectivity and amyloid plaques. Cell. 1989;59:847–57. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90608-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weissmann C, Li J, Mahal SP, Browning S. Prions on the move. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:1109–17. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hill AF, Desbruslais M, Joiner S, Sidle KCL, Gowland I, Collinge J, Doey LJ, Lantos P. The same prion strain causes vCJD and BSE. Nature. 1997;389:448–50, 526. doi: 10.1038/38925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bruce ME, Will RG, Ironside JW, McConnell I, Drummond D, Suttie A, McCardle L, Chree A, Hope J, Birkett C, et al. Transmissions to mice indicate that ‘new variant’ CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature. 1997;389:498–501. doi: 10.1038/39057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Deleault NR, Walsh DJ, Piro JR, Wang F, Wang X, Ma J, Rees JR, Supattapone S. Cofactor molecules maintain infectious conformation and restrict strain properties in purified prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E1938–46. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206999109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Deleault NR, Piro JR, Walsh DJ, Wang F, Ma J, Geoghegan JC, Supattapone S. Isolation of phosphatidylethanolamine as a solitary cofactor for prion formation in the absence of nucleic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:8546–51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204498109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Makarava N, Kovacs GG, Savtchenko R, Alexeeva I, Budka H, Rohwer RG, Baskakov IV. Genesis of mammalian prions: from non-infectious amyloid fibrils to a transmissible prion disease. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002419. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Makarava N, Kovacs GG, Savtchenko R, Alexeeva I, Ostapchenko VG, Budka H, Rohwer RG, Baskakov IV. A new mechanism for transmissible prion diseases. J Neurosci. 2012;32:7345–55. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6351-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Makarava N, Kovacs GG, Bocharova O, Savtchenko R, Alexeeva I, Budka H, Rohwer RG, Baskakov IV. Recombinant prion protein induces a new transmissible prion disease in wild-type animals. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:177–87. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0633-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Legname G, Nguyen HOB, Baskakov IV, Cohen FE, Dearmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Strain-specified characteristics of mouse synthetic prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:2168–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409079102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Legname G, Baskakov IV, Nguyen HOB, Riesner D, Cohen FE, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Synthetic mammalian prions. Science. 2004;305:673–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1100195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Colby DW, Giles K, Legname G, Wille H, Baskakov IV, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Design and construction of diverse mammalian prion strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:20417–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910350106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Colby DW, Wain R, Baskakov IV, Legname G, Palmer CG, Nguyen HO, Lemus A, Cohen FE, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Protease-sensitive synthetic prions. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000736. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Raymond GJ, Race B, Hollister JR, Offerdahl DK, Moore RA, Kodali R, Raymond LD, Hughson AG, Rosenke R, Long D, et al. Isolation of novel synthetic prion strains by amplification in transgenic mice coexpressing wild-type and anchorless prion proteins. J Virol. 2012;86:11763–78. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01353-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang F, Wang X, Yuan CG, Ma J. Generating a prion with bacterially expressed recombinant prion protein. Science. 2010;327:1132–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1183748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Makarava N, Kovacs GG, Savtchenko R, Alexeeva I, Budka H, Rohwer RG, Baskakov IV. Stabilization of a prion strain of synthetic origin requires multiple serial passages. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:30205–14. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.392985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ghaemmaghami S, Colby DW, Nguyen HO, Hayashi S, Oehler A, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Convergent replication of mouse synthetic prion strains. Am J Pathol. 2013;182:866–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.11.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ghaemmaghami S, Watts JC, Nguyen HO, Hayashi S, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Conformational transformation and selection of synthetic prion strains. J Mol Biol. 2011;413:527–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lasmézas CI, Deslys JP, Robain O, Jaegly A, Beringue V, Peyrin JM, Fournier JG, Hauw JJ, Rossier J, Dormont D. Transmission of the BSE agent to mice in the absence of detectable abnormal prion protein. Science. 1997;275:402–5. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5298.402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wille H, Bian W, McDonald M, Kendall A, Colby DW, Bloch L, Ollesch J, Borovinskiy AL, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB, et al. Natural and synthetic prion structure from X-ray fiber diffraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:16990–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909006106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ostapchenko VG, Sawaya MR, Makarava N, Savtchenko R, Nilsson KP, Eisenberg D, Baskakov IV. Two amyloid States of the prion protein display significantly different folding patterns. J Mol Biol. 2010;400:908–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.05.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Breydo L, Sun Y, Makarava N, Lee CI, Novitskaia V, Bocharova O, Kao JPY, Baskakov IV. Nonpolar substitution at the C-terminus of the prion protein, a mimic of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor, partially impairs amyloid fibril formation. Biochemistry. 2007;46:852–61. doi: 10.1021/bi061923v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Béringue V, Herzog L, Jaumain E, Reine F, Sibille P, Le Dur A, Vilotte JL, Laude H. Facilitated cross-species transmission of prions in extraneural tissue. Science. 2012;335:472–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1215659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Collinge J. Medicine. Prion strain mutation and selection. Science. 2010;328:1111–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1190815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li J, Browning S, Mahal SP, Oelschlegel AM, Weissmann C. Darwinian evolution of prions in cell culture. Science. 2010;327:869–72. doi: 10.1126/science.1183218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Makarava N, Baskakov IV. The evolution of transmissible prions: the role of deformed templating. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003759. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Makarava N, Baskakov IV. Genesis of tramsmissible protein states via deformed templating. Prion. 2012;6:252–5. doi: 10.4161/pri.19930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Makarava N, Ostapchenko VG, Savtchenko R, Baskakov IV. Conformational switching within individual amyloid fibrils. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:14386–95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900533200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Makarava N, Lee CI, Ostapchenko VG, Baskakov IV. Highly promiscuous nature of prion polymerization. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:36704–13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704926200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gonzalez-Montalban N, Lee YJ, Makarava N, Savtchenko R, Baskakov IV. Changes in prion replication environment cause prion strain mutation. FASEB J. 2013;27:3702–10. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-230466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ghaemmaghami S, Ahn M, Lessard P, Giles K, Legname G, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Continuous quinacrine treatment results in the formation of drug-resistant prions. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000673. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Berry DB, Lu D, Geva M, Watts JC, Bhardwaj S, Oehler A, Renslo AR, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB, Giles K. Drug resistance confounding prion therapeutics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E4160–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317164110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miller-Vedam L, Ghaemmaghami S. Strain specificity and drug resistance in anti-prion therapy. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13:2397–406. doi: 10.2174/15680266113136660168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oelschlegel AM, Weissmann C. Acquisition of drug resistance and dependence by prions. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003158. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Makarava N, Savtchenko R, Baskakov IV. Selective amplification of classical and atypical prions using modified protein misfolding cyclic amplification. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:33–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.419531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gonzalez-Montalban N, Baskakov IV. Assessment of strain-specific PrP(Sc) elongation rates revealed a transformation of PrP(Sc) properties during protein misfolding cyclic amplification. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li J, Mahal SP, Demczyk CA, Weissmann C. Mutability of prions. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:1243–50. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mahal SP, Browning S, Li J, Suponitsky-Kroyter I, Weissmann C. Transfer of a prion strain to different hosts leads to emergence of strain variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:22653–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013014108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Daus ML, Wagenführ K, Thomzig A, Boerner S, Hermann P, Hermelink A, Beekes M, Lasch P. Infrared Microspectroscopy Detects Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification (PMCA)-induced Conformational Alterations in Hamster Scrapie Progeny Seeds. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:35068–80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.497131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]