Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2014 Aug 14;55(40):5570–5571. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.08.028

An efficient synthesis of 3-(N-piperidinemethyl)-2, 2, 5, 5-tetramethyl-1-oxy-3-pyrroline, a promising radioprotector for cancer radiotherapy

Haitao Wu a,*, Vincent Coble a, Olga Vasalatiy a, Rolf E Swenson a, Murali C Krishna b, James B Mitchell b
PMCID: PMC4190098  NIHMSID: NIHMS625550  PMID: 25309004

Abstract

Nitroxides can ameliorate the toxic effects of radiation during cancer therapy. Nitroxides are paramagnetic and can be used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (EPRI) to monitor in vivo oxidative stress status. Compound 5 (3-(N-piperidinemethyl)-2, 2, 5, 5-tetramethyl-1-oxy-3-pyrroline) was found to be the most effective nitroxide radioprotector. An efficient synthesis for this promising radioprotector was developed.

Keywords: Nitroxide, redox, radioprotector, MRI, EPRI


Protection from radiation exposure is important for radiation cancer treatment or a nuclear accident. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, exceeded only by heart disease. The estimated number of new cancer cases is 1.66 million and about 580,350 people are expected to die in US alone in 2013.1 The death rates of cancer did not change much over the past 80 years except for lung and bronchus cancers. It is well known that cancer can be treated with ionizing radiation, but the inevitable normal tissues exposure during cancer radiotherapy or a nuclear accident can promote carcinogenesis and a variety of toxicities.2, 3 Pre-exposure administration of a radiation protective drug can reduce radiation damage by ameliorating the toxic effects of radiation. Preclinical studies in mice have shown that administration of Tempol (1-oxyl-2, 2, 6, 6-tetramethyl-4-hydroxypiperidine) decreases the severity of xerostomia (dry mouth) after salivary gland irradiation and increases the LD50/30 after whole-body irradiation.46 Nitroxides are paramagnetic and their pharmacokinetics can therefore be monitored with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (EPRI), and their concentration in tissues can be quantified.5, 6 The in vivo redox reactions among nitroxides, reactive oxygen species and intracellular antioxidants can also be used for redox imaging study. Formation of diamagnetic hydroxylamine from nitroxide redox reaction results in signal loss in T1-weighted MRI scan which can provide an imaging-based assay of tissue redox status.7 Based on the initial findings on the radioprotective effects of the model compound Tempol 4, 8, 9 and a systematic in vitro survey of a variety of nitroxide-related radioprotectors,10 compound 3-(N-piperidinemethyl)-2, 2, 5, 5-tetramethyl-1-oxy-3-pyrroline, 5 was found to be the most effective radioprotector against lethal doses of radiation in mice.11 In addition, the compound readily passes the blood–brain barrier (BBB). A previous synthesis of compound 5 produced about 5% overall yield over a 6-step synthesis (Scheme 1).10 Following this procedure we noticed a UV invisible byproduct next to product 5 on TLC plate that can be detected by I2 staining. The separation of the two products was difficult. In addition the product purity cannot be accurately characterized by NMR due to the paramagnetic property of the product or by HPLC due to the weak UV absorption of the byproduct and the similarity of their retention times. The byproduct was found to be hydroxylamine compound 7. Contamination of the diamagnetic hydroxylamine would adversely affect the MR and EPR imaging quality. The availability of a more convenient and efficient synthesis method of this promising agent would be beneficial.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Reagents and conditions: (i) Br2, AcOH, 12h, 90%; (ii) NaOMe in MeOH, rt, 1h, 40%; (iii) Red-Al in toluene, 40°C, 1h, 61%; (iv) H2O2, Na2WO4 in MeOH, 0°C-rt, 36h, 50%; (v) MsCl, TEA in DCM, 0°C-rt, 3h, 87%; (vi) piperidine, NaH in DMF, 0°C-rt, 4h, 47%.

We found that the Favorskii rearrangement of 3, 5-dibromo-4-oxo-2, 2, 6, 6-tetramethylpiperidine 2 could be done in the presence of piperidine to form the piperidine derivative 3 directly in 89% yield (Scheme 2).12 The conversion of the amine 3 to the nitroxide 4 was carried out in 90% yield by stirring with the H2O2 and Na2WO4 oxidants at room temperature for 2 days. Amide carbonyl reduction of 4 using LiAlH4 instead of Red-Al also gave an improved yield of 92%.13 However trace amount of hydroxylamine byproduct 7 (< 5%) was still present. The byproduct can be completely converted to product 5 by adding m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA) oxidant to the reaction mixture and then stirring for 2 h; m-CPBA can be easily removed afterward by liquid extraction workup in basic aqueous solution. The improved synthesis route to 5 reduced the total synthesis to four steps and increased the overall yield to 65% while completely eliminating the contamination of hydroxylamine byproduct 7. The purification procedures were also simplified.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reagents and conditions: (i) Br2, AcOH, 12h, 90%; (ii) Piperidine, TEA-H2O, rt, 6h and then 50°C, 6h, 89%; (iii) H2O2, Na2WO4 in H2O, rt, 2d in dark, 90%; (iv) LiAlH4 in THF, rt, 24h, 92%; (v) p-TSA in ether, rt. 96%; (vi) m-CPBA, rt, 2h.

Supplementary Material

NIHMS625550-supplement.docx (878.7KB, docx)

Highlights.

  • An improved strategy to synthesize a nitroxide radio protector is described.

  • The previously reported six-step synthesis procedure is reduced to four steps.

  • A number of synthetic steps and over all yield are significantly improved.

  • The simplified synthesis conveniently removes the major byproduct contamination.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported [in part] by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research and through intramural research funds for the Imaging Probe Development Center as administered by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Supplementary data Experimental procedures and complete spectral data and the copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra of all intermediates and final product are available. Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version.

References and Notes

  • 1.American Cancer Society Cancer Facts & Figs. American Cancer Society; Atlanta: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Henderson TO, Amsterdam A, Bhatia S, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, Neglia JP, Diller LR, Constine LS, Smith RA, Mahoney MC, Morris EA, Montgomery LL, Landier W, Smith SM, Robison LL, Oeffinger KC. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2010;152:444. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.DiCarlo AL, Maher C, Hick JL, Hanfling D, Dainiak N, Chao N, Bader JL, Coleman CN, Weinstock DM. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:S32. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2011.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hahn SM, Tochner Z, Krishna CM, Glass J, Wilson L, Samuni A, Sprague M, Venzon D, Glatstein E, Mitchell JB, Russo A. Cancer Research. 1992;52:1750. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cotrim AP, Hyodo F, Matsumoto KI, Sowers AL, Cook JA, Baum BJ, Krishna MC, Mitchell JB. Clinical Cancer Research. 2007;13:4928. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cotrim AP, Sowers AL, Lodde BM, Vitolo JM, Kingman A, Russo A, Mitchell JB, Baum BJ. Clinical Cancer Research. 2005;11:7564. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Davis RM, Mitchell JB, Krishna MC. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. 2011;11:347. doi: 10.2174/187152011795677526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hahn SM, Sullivan FJ, DeLuca AM, Krishna CM, Wersto N, Venzon D, Russo A, Mitchell JB. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 1997;22:1211. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(96)00556-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mitchell JB, Degraff W, Kaufman D, Krishna MC, Samuni A, Finkelstein E, Ahn MS, Hahn SM, Gamson J, Russo A. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 1991;289:62. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90442-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Krishna MC, DeGraff W, Hankovszky OH, Sár CP, Kálai T, Jekő J, Russo A, Mitchell JB, Hideg K. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1998;41:3477. doi: 10.1021/jm9802160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Davis RM, Sowers AL, DeGraff W, Bernardo M, Thetford A, Krishna MC, Mitchell JB. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2011;51:780. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stork SW, Makinen MW. Synthesis. 1999;8:1309. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Powell JH, Johnson EM, Gannett PM. Molecules. 2000;5:1244. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

NIHMS625550-supplement.docx (878.7KB, docx)

RESOURCES