Abstract
Background
The reported efficiency of differentiation of human bone marrow derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hBM MSC) into dopaminergic neurons with different inducers is found to vary. Thus, in the current study we have investigated the response of hBM MSC to some of the neuronal inducers and their combinations. Neuronal differentiation inducing agents Fibroblastic Growth Factor 2 (FGF2), Sonic Hedge Hog (Shh), Fibroblastic Growth Factor 8 (FGF8) & All Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA) were used either singly or in varied combinations.
Results
The differentiated and undifferentiated hBM MSC were characterized in terms of morphology, expression of cell markers at transcriptional and translational levels, amount of dopamine secreted by the cells in the media and changes in cell membrane potential by calcium ions imaging. Induced hBM MSC revealed neuron like morphology and expressed cellular markers suggesting neuronal differentiation with all the inducing agents. However, upon quantitative analysis through qPCR, cells induced with FGF2 were found to show maximum expression of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) by 47.5 folds. Immunofluorescence analysis of differentiated and undifferentiated cells also revealed expression of nestin, neurofilament, microtubule associated protein- 2, beta tubulin III and TH in differentiated cells, at translational level. This data was supported by immunoblotting analysis. Further, ELISA study also supported the release of dopamine by cultures induced with FGF2. When the cells were depolarised with KCl solution, those induced with Shh & FGF8 showed maximum calcium ion trafficking, followed by the cells induced with FGF2 only.
Conclusions
We conclude that hBM MSC can be coaxed to differentiate efficiently into dopaminergic neurons in the presence of a very simple media cocktail containing only one main inducer like FGF2 and thus contribute towards cellular therapy in Parkinson's and other related disorders. These dopaminergic neurons are also functionally active, as shown by calcium ion trafficking.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12929-014-0083-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: hBM MSC, Dopaminergic neurons, FGF2, Shh/FGF8, ATRA, Parkinson’s disease, Calcium ion imaging
Background
Parkinson’s Disorder (PD) is a neuro-degenerative disease caused by degeneration of nigrostraital system, affecting people worldwide. Progressive degeneration of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the pars compacta of the substantia nigra is the major cause of the disorder. Stem cells have the potential to generate lineage committed cells, showing great promise to regenerative medicine. Human bone marrow derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hBM MSC) are considered as one of the best candidates for regeneration because of their properties like easy isolation, robust expansion, immunological naivety and devoid of ethical issues [1-3]. The stimulation for commitment towards neuronal lineage given to MSC in various studies was in the form of chemicals or growth factors [4-10]. Use of growth factors as inducers of differentiation has led to the generation of better results in terms of efficiency, cytotoxicity, and long term maintenance of these cells in culture, instead of chemicals [11]. The efficiency of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) positive neuron generation from MSC has been reported variedly. This might be because of the different differentiation protocols followed to provide stimulation to MSC by various research groups. Thus, there is still a need for an optimum protocol which can generate TH positive neurons from hBM MSC.
The focus of the present study is on inducers like FGF2, Shh, FGF8 and ATRA as they all have role in the early developmental stages of the nervous system. Although these inducers have been studied earlier, but they have never been compared in terms of efficiency of TH positive cells generation using hBM MSC. We have explored the formulation of a defined efficient media by investigating the different growth factors and their combinations, with the aim of robust generation of DA neurons from hBM MSC.
Methods
The study was approved by the Institution Human Ethics Committee.
MSC isolation, culture and characterization
Normal human BM was collected from patients of age ranging from 13–58 yrs, undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation after taking prior informed consent from patient or legal guardian. Five BM samples, aspirated from iliac crest of the patients have been used in our study. Primary culture of hBM MSC was established and maintained as per described in our previous paper [12]. For all the subsequent experiments, cells from 3rd passage were used.
Characterization of expanded hBM MSC: flow cytometric analysis
Surface marker staining
Surface marker staining to characterize the isolated hBM MSC was done as per the protocol described in our previous publication [12]. CD73 PE, CD90 PECy5, HLA Class I APC, HLA Class II FITC, CD 34 PE (Becton Dickinson, USA) & CD105 APC (e Bioscience, USA) were used. Controls were made by corresponding isotypes: IgG1 coupled with PE, PECy5, APC & FITC.
Intracellular staining
hBM MSC after exposure to the differentiation inducing agents, were intracellularly stained for TH and Neuronal Nuclei (NeuN), as per described in our previous protocol [12].
Cell differentiation: osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic and neuronal lineages
hBM MSC were characterized by differentiating cells into osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic lineages according to the induction protocols described in our earlier published research article [12].
Neuronal Differentiation: Basic induction medium containing Neurobasal medium (Gibco, USA), B27 supplement (Gibco, USA), EGF (Peprotech Asia, Israel), L-Glutamine (Gibco, USA) and PenStrep (Gibco, USA) was used. FGF2 (10 ng/ml), Shh + FGF8 (10 ng/ml), ATRA (0.1µM) and Shh + FGF8 + ATRA were added to the basic induction media in different combinations (All the growth factors were procured from Peprotech Asia, Israel and ATRA from Sigma, USA). The induction protocol was carried out for 12 days in all the four study groups.
Cell growth kinetics assay
MTT (3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5- diphenyltertra-zolium bromide) assay was used to investigate cytotoxic effects of various inducers on hBM MSC. The assay was performed at various time points of induction period (Day1, day3, day5, day7, day9 and day12) in all the four study groups with different inducers. Briefly, 1 × 104 hBM MSC per well were plated onto flat-bottomed 48-well plates (Corning Glass Works, Corning, New York) with 500 μl of induction medium. At termination of different time points, the cells were subjected to 50 μl of MTT solution (5 mg/ml) for three hours at 37°C. Finally, 300 μl dimethylsulfoxide (Sigma, USA) was added to each well and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C to dissolve all the formazan crystals. The coloured solution (200 µl) was transferred to 96 well plates and read at 570 nm using EL 800 plate reader (Biotek, USA) and recorded with Gen5 1.08.4 software (Biotek, USA). All the experiments were performed in triplicates for three samples each.
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was isolated after termination of the differentiation induction period by phenol-chloroform method. cDNA was prepared using 1 μg of RNA by RT enzyme (Promega, USA). This cDNA was further used for amplification by PCR using primers for neuronal related genes (Table 1). Finally, PCR products were run on 2% agarose gel using gel electrophoresis system (Biorad Laboratories) and analysed on gel documentation system (Alpha Digi Doc).
Table 1.
Gene | Primer sequence | Annealing temp. |
---|---|---|
Nestin | GCCCTGACCACTCCAGTTTA | 55.0°C |
GGAGTCCTGGATTTCCTTCC | ||
Neurofilament | TGGGAAATGGCTCGTCATTT | 56.7°C |
CTTCATGGAAGCGGCCACTT | ||
TUJ I | GGGATCCACTCCACGAAGTA | 61.0°C |
CGAGACCTACTGCATCGACA | ||
MAP2 | CTCAACAGTTCTATCTCTTCTTCA | 60.0°C |
TCTTCTTGTTTAAATCCTAACACT | ||
TH (For RT & qPCR) | GGTCGCGCTGCCTGTACT | 53.9°C |
TCATCACCTGGTCACCAAGTT | ||
GAPDH | GACAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAG | 57.0°C |
GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGTCGT |
Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
The qPCR experiments were performed using a Realplex real time PCR detection system (Eppendorf, Germany). Human specific primers (MWG-Biotech AG) used are as mentioned in Table I. Reactions were carried out using SYBR Green Super Mix (Kapa Biosystems, USA) in a final volume of 10 μl with 0.3 μM of each primer. Negative controls were used as no template cDNA reactions and melting curves were used to confirm the results. The results were normalized using GAPDH concentration of each sample.
Immunoflorescence assay
The assay was performed as described previously [12], using primary monoclonal antibodies against nestin, neuronal nuclei (NeuN), microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP2), neurofilament (NF) and β- tubulin III (Tuj1) (Chemicon, USA), followed by incubation with respective secondary antibodies (TR conjugated for TH and FITC conjugated for nestin, NF, NeuN, Tuj1 and MAP2).
Dopamine estimation through enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
DA levels were quantified using an ELISA kit obtained from Rocky Mountain Diagnostics (Colarado Springs, CO) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. At the end of termination period, media was collected and 4 mM of Sodium Metabisulphite and 1 mM of EDTA was added and stored at −80°C till processed.
Functional assay for differentiated cells
Cell preparation and loading of dye
Human BM MSC were cultured in 2-chambered culture slides (Nunc, Denmark). These cells were exposed to neuronal differentiation media for induction as mentioned above. Post differentiation, these cells were washed twice with 1X HBSS (Sigma, USA) at room temperature under sterile condition. 10 nM of Fura-Red-AM (Invitrogen, USA) solution was made in phenol red free 1X HBSS which was then probed on to the cells in the chambered slides for 45 min at 37°C/5% CO2. The dye solution was then removed from the slides and cells were finally washed twice with 1X HBSS to remove the excess non diffused dye. The cells were kept in 1X HBSS for 30 min at 37°C/5% CO2 before acquisition. This was performed for both differentiated cells as well as uninduced (UI) hBM MSC.
Visualization and monitoring calcium concentration changes
The experiment was performed using Leica Confocal Microscope (Model TCS SP5). Recording for both the wavelengths (488 nm and 457 nm) were carried out for 6 min in HBSS. Then, HBSS was removed and 50 mM KCl solution was added before further recording for 10 min. Experiments were carried out in duplicates. The data was analysed using Leica LAS AF software. The intracellular calcium concentration was calculated according to the formulae derived by Grynkiewicz et. al. [13].
Immunoblotting analysis
Whole cell lysates were obtained by resuspension of cell pellets in 500 μl RIPA buffer (Sigma, USA) and 40 μl of protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, USA). The lysates were estimated for protein concentration using BCA Assay method. Protein extracts (40 μg) were subjected to SDS-PAGE using 12% Tris/HCl SDS gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Membrane Technologies, India). Membranes were blocked using 3% BSA (Himedia, India) for 2 hours, followed by incubation with primary antibody against β- actin (Abcam,UK, 1:500) and tyrosine hydroxylase (Santa Cruz, USA, 1:500) in 1% BSA- phosphate saline buffer (PBS) overnight at 4°C. Post incubation, membranes were washed thrice in TBST and incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP) - conjugated secondary antibody (1/4,000) (Dako, USA) for 2 hours at room temperature. Membranes were developed with chemiluminescence detection reagents (Pierce, USA) and acquired by using Gel Imager machine (Fluor Chem E, Cell Biosciences, Australia).
Statistical analysis
Means ± SD of independent experiments were analyzed by One-way ANOVA test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Characterization of human hBM MSC
The hBM MSC were characterized on the basis of immunophenotyping and tri-lineage differentiation assay. They expressed CD105, CD73, CD90 and HLA Class I and were negative for HLA Class II, CD45 and CD34 (Figure 1A and Additional file 1: Figure S1). These cells were able to appreciably differentiate into adipocytes, osteocytes and chondrocytes after induction (Figure 1B)
Different differentiation protocols lead hBM MSC towards neuronal lineage
Morphological analysis of induced hBM MSC
Analysis of morphological features revealed the transition from typical hBM MSC morphology i.e. spindle shaped with monolayer arrangement (whirlpool pattern) towards neuronal like cells during the 12 day induction period (Figure 2 A-B). Maximum cell death was found in media with Shh + FGF8 + ATRA followed by Shh + FGF8, ATRA and least in media with FGF2, as depicted by the MTT assay at various time points of neuronal induction (Figure 2C).
Expression of neuronal specific markers in hBM MSC
The different media were able to coax hBM MSC towards neuronal lineage as this was evident by the observations of transcriptional and translational studies. The expression of Nestin, NF, TUJI, MAP2 and TH were checked through immunofluorescence (Figure 3) and Reverse Transcriptase-PCR (Figure 4A) analysis. The results revealed the expression of all these markers, indicative of neuronal cell identity. Quantitative Flow cytometric analysis for NeuN expression in different induction protocols revealed equivalent prevalence of this marker for all cultures treated with different media (Figure 5B).
Induced hBM MSC showed traits of DA neurons
Presence of TH was observed at both translational and transcriptional levels. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed the presence of TH positive neurons in all the differentiation protocols (Figure 3 & 4A-B). Quantitatively, through flow cytometry, TH was found to express in 28.18 ± 10%, 12.5 ± 2.3%, 18.6 ± 9.1% and 12.06 ± 1.5% of cells in media with FGF2, ATRA, Shh + FGF8 & Shh + FGF8 + ATRA respectively, against almost equivalent percentage expression of NeuN in cell cultures treated with different media (Figure 5A-B). Basal level of expression of TH and NeuN was 1.25 ± 0.2% and 1.27 ± 0.23% respectively. Cells treated with media containing FGF2 showed maximum up regulation of TH followed by Shh/FGF8, Shh/FGF8/ATRA and ATRA (Figure 4B) when evaluated through quantitative PCR. Quantitative PCR data was also supported by western blot analysis. However, lower level of TH was observed in the uninduced group (Figure 6A).
Post induction culture is heterogenous: presence of astrocytic population
Flow cytometric analysis revealed that 9% of induced culture populations were positive for GFAP in case of media with Shh + FGF8 + ATRA followed by media containing ATRA (8.3%), FGF2 (5.5%) and Shh + FGF8 (4.9%) (Figure 5C).
TH positive neurons release dopamine in culture supernatant
The DA levels were measured with an ELISA kit based on the principal of competitive ELISA. Neurobasal Media and Neurobasal media + B-27 supplement were used as controls. Dopamine was detected only in cells treated with media containing FGF2, at a concentration of 69.1 ± 3.9 pg/ ml (Figure 6B)
Differentiated cells demonstrate active intracellular calcium changes in response to potassium chloride (KCl)
It is known that functional neurons express calcium channels which get activated by depolarization. We observed that stimulation with depolarizing agent, KCl; led to an increased calcium influx in the cells induced for differentiation (Additional file 2: Figure S2). It was presumably due to the activation of calcium channels. Interestingly, we did not observe any net change in the intracellular calcium influx before and after depolarization in UI MSC. Figure 6B shows the representative software generated graph of image ratio for all the treatment groups as well as the UI MSCs which have been supplemented with time lapse calcium imaging videos (See video uploads in Additional files 3, 4, 5, and 6: M1/FGF2, M2/FGF8 + Shh, M3/ATRA, M4/ Shh + FGF8 + ATRA).
Discussion
hBM MSC pre-differentiated towards DA neurons can contribute to the treatment of PD without raising issues of rejection, malignancy and ethics as in case of Embryonic Stem Cells (ESC). Much efforts have been laid to investigate the appropriate in vitro cues which drive these cells to differentiate into TH positive neurons. hBM MSC induction by ATRA [7], Shh [15], FGF8 [17] and FGF2 [11] has been widely used for neuronal differentiation. These induction strategies are based on the in vivo role of these factors during the development of the nervous system in embryonic stage. However, considering the previous literature, not much has been elaborated on the in vitro effect of these factors on hBM MSC, especially in the process of DA neuron generation. Thus, in this study we tried to elucidate the effect of these exogenous factors on BM MSC and provide with a comparative overview of the same.
The dose of Shh and FGF8 used in the current study is less as compared to that used in other studies involving ESC or MSC, in which Shh and FGF8 have been used in the range of 250–500 ng/ml and 100–250 ng/ml respectively. In our case, during initial standardization we have noticed that the higher concentrations of Shh and FGF8 were cytotoxic to the hBM MSC and the cells showed loss of adherence. We reduced the concentration to 10 ng/ml for both Shh and FGF8 after titration with concentrations 250, 200, 150, 100, 50, 25, 20 and 10 ng/ml. At the lowest concentration of 10 ng/ml of Shh and FGF8, we observed no significant cytotoxicity and maintenance of the adherence properties. One reason for this contradiction may be the use of adherence substrates like laminin and fibronectin by the previous studies.
The time period of induction of DA neurons generation in stem cells has shown variation ranging from 3 to 21 days. Especially in case of ESCs and sequential directed differentiation, the induction period is long as compared to the case of hBM MSC, where majority of studies have reported an induction period of not more than 2 weeks. In our study also, it was observed that the cells beyond 2 weeks were not healthy and there was increase in cell death. Thus, we optimized the induction period to day 12, after which, upon characterization we found the expression of neuronal markers as well as traits of DA neurons.
With the development of techniques and protocols to generate DA neurons, different types of strategies have been investigated, amongst which, sequential directed differentiation has been extremely common; with two variations, one with the use of chemical reagents and another with cytokines/ growth factors. In majority of cases, cells have been pre-primed with FGF2 before the initiation of the induction process. However, there was no report about the status of the DA neuron related molecular markers after treatment with FGF2 in these cells.
Upon getting positive cues in the direction of DA neuron generation, during the initial experiments using hBM MSC, we planned to include FGF2 as one of the inducers in the current comparative study. Also, FGF2 is reported to be involved in the development, maintenance, & survival of the nervous system [14]. It exerts neurotrophic activity on DA neurons both in vitro and in vivo. FGF2 along with Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) has previously been used for in vitro differentiation of MSC into neurons [11]. Apart from this, many other studies with the aim of DA neuron differentiation have used FGF2 for pre-priming of stem cells before exposure to the specific induction agents. However, its role in terms of efficient DA neuron generation needs to be evaluated in hBM MSC.
ATRA, through the Retinoid signaling pathway acts as an important mediator of cell differentiation and function during the development of the nervous system [15]. ATRA mediated in vitro induction of hBM MSC has shown differentiation towards neuronal lineage as analysed by the presence of neuronal specific markers. In the present study, ATRA alone and in combination with Shh and FGF8 was used, as these factors have shown to exert synergistic effects on neural competent MSCs to induce expression of a comprehensive set of genes and proteins that define peripheral nervous system (PNS) sensory neurons [16].
Shh and FGF8 have been specifically used in the differentiation of ESC into TH positive neurons, in vitro. It is believed that developing cells in vivo are signaled to differentiate into DA phenotype when they encounter intersecting signals occurring along the anterior-posterior (FGF8) and dorsal-ventral (Shh) axes [17]. In the present study, combination of both Shh and FGF8 is used as it has been observed previously that neither of the GFs i.e. Shh and FGF8 alone can adequately provide signal for DA neuron generation in vivo and the presence of both Shh and FGF8 simultaneously lead to the appearance of TH positive DA neurons
The present study comparatively evaluates the optimal inducer of neuronal lineage with significant inclination towards generation of neuronal subtype i.e. DA neurons from hBM MSC. As of now, very few studies have compared the chemicals/GFs to determine optimum induction media composition [18,19]. Different studies with the use of varied induction protocols reported induction efficiency of MSCs to DA neurons ranging from 12.7 to 67% [9,20-23]. Katarzyna et al., 2007 have reported the presence of 90% neurons as depicted by expression of the neuronal mature marker NeuN in differentiated hBM MSC when induced with Shh + FGF8 + FGF2 with an efficiency of ~ 67% to generate TH positive neurons (23). However, this and many other such studies do not throw light on the role of FGF2 alone in the differentiation of hBM MSC into dopamine secreting neuronal cells. Our study reveals a maximum efficiency of 66% with FGF2 alone as induction agent followed by Shh + FGF8 (42%), Shh + FGF8 + ATRA (32%) and ATRA (27.6%). This suggests that the DA neuron induction efficiency with only FGF2 is comparable in terms of induction efficiency obtained with Shh + FGF8 + FGF2. If we compare the induction studies of Katarzyna et al. (23) and ours, culture media containing FGF2 along with Shh and FGF8 fairs better than FGF2 alone as used in our study in terms of overall percentage of neuronal differentiation.
This study also indicated the presence of glial fibroblast acidic protein (GFAP) positive cell population in the induced cultures using different differentiation protocols. This can be a promoting and supporting factor for the generation and survival of DA neurons. It has also been reported that in vivo astrocytes are capable of regulating neurogenesis by apparently instructing the stem cells to adapt a neuronal fate [24]. A majority of previous studies have used glial derived neurotrophic protein (GDNF) or brain- derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as one of the constituents of the differentiation media cocktail [21]. However, it seems that the GFAP positive cells don’t have any role in neuronal sub type determination during in vitro differentiation.
We further investigated the functionality of these differentiated cells. Calcium ion acts as an important secondary messenger for signal transduction. Intracellular Ca2+ concentration changes caused by extracellular high K+ ions in cells is usually used as an indicator of excitability [25]. At variance with previous reports regarding hBM MSC [26,27], we and other groups have detected these features only after neuronal differentiation, but not in uninduced state. In the current study, we have found that there was a certain level of calcium activity post depolarization with KCl in neuronal differentiated MSCs. Cells treated with different induction media consisting of FGF2, Shh/FGF8, ATRA and Shh/FGF8/ATRA showed change in Ca2+ concentration upon depolarization. A total change of 8 folds in the calcium ion concentration was observed in case of media containing FGF8 and Shh, followed by 6.5 fold change in media with FGF2 alone. Although, the change in the calcium ion concentration with remaining two groups of media cocktails was found to be insignificant.
The present results are in line with previous reports stating the role of FGF2 and Shh + FGF8 during DA neuronal differentiation in vitro as well as in vivo. These were the two induction agents which yielded maximum DA neurons differentiated from hBM MSC. We conclude that FGF2 alone is an adequate signal to drive hBM MSC towards DA neuronal subtype.
Conclusion
FGF2 alone proves to be an efficient inducer to differentiate BM-MSC into functionally active dopaminergic neurons.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Indian Council of Medical Research, India through Grant No. 80/13/2006/BMS and Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India through DBT- Centre of Excellence Grant No. BT/01/COE/07/03.
Abbreviations
- hBM MSC
human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells
- BM MSCs
Bone marrow- mesenchymal stem cells
- FGF2
Fibroblast growth factor-2
- SHH
Sonic hedgehog
- FGF-8
Fibroblast growth factor-8
- ATRA
All- trans retinoic acid
- PD
Parkinson’s disease
- DA
Dopaminergic
- TH
Tyrosine hydroxylase
- NeuN
Neuronal nuclei
- NF
Neurofilament
- MAP-2
Microtubule associated protein-2
- Tuj1
β- tubulin III
- ELISA
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
- ESC
Embryonic stem cells
- EGF
Epidermal growth factor
- GFAP
Glial fibrillary acidic protein
Additional files
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
SB: Designing the work plan, executing the experiment, analyzing the data, manuscript writing; SM: Designing the work plan, analyzing the data and manuscript revision; MS: Designing and execution of the experiment, manuscript writing & modification; MB: Designing the work plan, providing bone marrow samples; BA: Providing bone marrow sample, arrangement of funds for the research. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Contributor Information
Sushmita Bose Nandy, Email: b_sush_2000@yahoo.com.
Sujata Mohanty, Email: drmohantysujata@gmail.com.
Manisha Singh, Email: write2manishasingh@gmail.com.
Madhuri Behari, Email: madhuribehari@hotmail.com.
Balram Airan, Email: iactscon_2004@yahoo.co.in.
References
- 1.Le Blanc K, Tammik L, Sundberg B, Haynesworth SE, Ringden O. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit and stimulate mixed lymphocyte culture and mitogenic response independently of the major histocompatibility complex. Scand J Immunol. 2003;57:11–20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2003.01176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chamberlain G, Fox J, Ashton B, Middleton J. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2739–2749. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC. Multilineage potential of adult Mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Woodbury D, Schwarz EJ, Prockop DJ, Black IB. Adult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons. J Neurosci Res. 2000;61:364–370. doi: 10.1002/1097-4547(20000815)61:4<364::AID-JNR2>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cho KJ, Trzaska KA, Greco SJ, McArdle J, Wang FS, Ye JH, Rameshwar P. Neurons derived from human mesenchymal stem cells show synaptic transmission and can be induced to produce the neurotransmitter substance P by interleukin-1 alpha. Stem Cells. 2005;23:383–391. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Greco SJ, Zhou C, Ye JH, Rameshwar An interdisciplinary approach and characterization of neuronal cells transdifferentiated from human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2007;16:811–826. doi: 10.1089/scd.2007.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jin K, Mao XO, Batteur S, Sun Y, Greenberg DA. Induction of neuronal markers in bone marrow cells: differential effects of growth factors and patterns of intracellular expression. Exp Neurol. 2003;184:78–89. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00133-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Qian L, Saltzman WM. Improving the expansion and neuronal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through culture surface modification. Biomaterials. 2007;25:1331–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tropel P, Platet N, Platel JC, Noël D, Albrieux M, Benabid AL, Berger F. Functional neuronal differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2868–2876. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wislet-Gendebien S, Hans G, Leprince P, Rigo JM, Moonen G, Rogister B. Plasticity of cultured mesenchymal stem cells: switch from nestin-positive to excitable neuron-like phenotype. Stem Cells. 2005;23:392–402. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khoo ML, Shen B, Tao H, Ma DD. Long-term serial passage and neuronal differentiation capability of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2008;17:883–896. doi: 10.1089/scd.2007.0185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sujata M, Sushmita B, Krishan Gopal J, Balram B, Balram A. TGFβ1 contributes towards the cardiomyogenic- like differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Cardiol. 2013;163(1):93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem. 1985;260(6):3440–3450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Timmer M, Cesnulevicius K, Winkler C, Kolb J, Lipokatic-Takacs E, Jungnickel J, Grothe C. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 and FGF receptor 3 are required for the development of the substantia nigra, and FGF-2 plays a crucial role for the rescue of dopaminergic neurons after 6-hydroxydopamine lesion. J Neurosci. 2007;27:459–471. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4493-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Niederreither K, Dollé P. Retinoic acid in development: towards an integrated view. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:541–553. doi: 10.1038/nrg2340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kondo T, Johnson SA, Yoder MC, Romand R, Hashino E. Sonic hedgehog and retinoic acid synergistically promote sensory fate specification from bone marrow-derived pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:4789–4794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408239102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stull ND, Iacovitti L. Sonic hedgehog and FGF8 inadequate signals for the differentiation of a dopamine phenotype in mouse and human neurons in culture. Exp Neurol. 2001;169:36–43. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ye W, Shimamura K, Rubenstein JL, Hynes MA, Rosenthal A. FGF and Shh signals control dopaminergic and serotonergic cell fate in the anterior neural plate. Cell. 1998;93:755–766. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81437-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Barzilay R, Kan I, Ben-Zur T, Bulvik S, Melamed E, Offen D. Induction of human mesenchymal stem cells into dopamine-producing cells with different differentiation protocols. Stem Cells Dev. 2008;1:547–554. doi: 10.1089/scd.2007.0172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fu YS, Cheng YC, Lin MY, Cheng H, Chu PM, Chou SC, Shih YH, Ko MH, Sung MS. Conversion of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in Wharton's jelly to dopaminergic neurons in vitro: potential therapeutic application for Parkinsonism. Stem Cells. 2006;24:115–124. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guo L, Yin F, Meng HQ, Ling L, Hu-He TN, Li P, Zhang CX, Yu S, Duan DS, Fan HX. Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into dopaminergic neuron-like cells in vitro. Biomed Environ Sci. 2005;18:36–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jiang Y, Henderson D, Blackstad M, Chen A, Miller RF, Verfaillie CM. Neuroectodermal differentiation from mouse multipotent adult progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(Suppl 1):11854–11860. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834196100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Trzaska KA, Kuzhikandathil EV, Rameshwar P. Specification of a dopaminergic phenotype from adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2797–2808. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Song H, Stevens CF, Gage FH. Astroglia induce neurogenesis from adult neural stem cells. Nature. 2002;417:39–44. doi: 10.1038/417039a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hung SC, Cheng H, Pan CY, Tsai MJ, Kao LS, Ma HL. In vitro differentiation of size-sieved stem cells into electrically active neural cells. Stem Cells. 2002;20(6):522–529. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.20-6-522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Heubach JF, Graf EM, Leutheuser J, Bock M, Balana B, Zahanich I, Christ T, Boxberger S, Wettwer E, Ravens U. Electrophysiological properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Physiol. 2004;554(3):659–672. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.055806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tao R, Lau CP, Tse HF, Li GR. Functional ion channels in mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;293:C1561–C1567. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00240.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]