Abstract
Spirogyra is found in a wide range of habitats, including small stagnant water bodies, rivers, and streams. Spirogyra ellipsospora is common in northern Thailand. Species identification of the Spirogyra species based only on morphological characteristics can be difficult. A reliable and accurate method is required to evaluate genetic variations. This study aims to apply molecular approaches for the identification of S. ellipsospora using microsatellites and rbcL markers. Based on DNA sequencing, the rbcL gene was sequenced and the data was analyzed using the BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) program in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database. The sequence of S. ellipsospora from this study revealed definitive identity matches in the range of 99% for the consensus sequences of S. ellipsospora. The 10 primers of ISSR could be amplified by 92 amplification fragments. The DNA fragments and the rbcL sequence data grouped the Spirogyra specimens into two distinct clusters.
Keywords: Spirogyra ellipsospora, rbcL, ISSR markers, Molecular identification
1. Introduction
Spirogyra is a genus of filamentous green algae in the order Zygnematales. The name indicates the helical or spiral arrangement of the chloroplasts, which is the main diagnostic characteristic of the genus. The Spirogyra species typically develops unbranched filaments and is one cell thick, which grows longer through normal cell division. There are more than 400 species of Spirogyra in the world. Identification of a particular Spirogyra species is accomplished by microscopic examination of the spores (Thiamdao and Peerapornpisal, 2011).
Vegetative growth of Spirogyra can be recognized by three characteristics: (i) type of cross walls (plane, replicate, semi-replicate or colligate), (ii) cell length and width and (iii) chloroplast numbers. The process of conjugation can be included for species identification (Berry and Lembi, 2000; Hainz et al., 2009). A morphological examination of Spirogyra reveals that it has spiral chloroplasts, pyrenoids, and a nucleus.
The morphology of some species of Spirogyra and Cladophora shows similar cell shapes and spiral chloroplasts. There have been few reports published on the diversity of Spirogyra in Thailand. Thiamdao and Peerapornpisal (2011) have previously investigated the morphology of Spirogyra ellipsospora in northern Thailand. This species is generally eaten raw in the north and northeast regions of Thailand. It goes by the local name tao, thao, or phakkai. Moreover, it is considered cosmopolitan and thrives in a wide range of habitats, including small stagnant water bodies and ditches, as well as in the littorals of lakes, rivers and streams. Cobble and gravel substrates are the preferred habitats of macroalgae. Spirogyra has been found to be in greater abundance during the hot, dry season and before the rainy season (Hainz et al., 2009).
However, the identification of S. ellipsospora has mainly been based on conjugation and zygospores, but is mostly found in the vegetative stage. Species identification of related Spirogyra species based on morphological characteristics can be difficult. Moreover, difficulties arise because this species is small and soft and also has only a few stable morphological characteristics and is subject to phenotypic variations. Thus, the identification of closely related species of Spirogyra has only been based on morphological characteristics and thus, it can be confused or misidentified. Molecular methods are useful in an evaluation of the genetic variations, as well as for accurate identification.
Molecular procedures using the PCR technique have been applied to support taxonomic evidence that is related to certain diverse organisms including algae. The microsatellite markers (ISSR) (Widmer et al., 2010) have been applied widely in the species identification of many living organisms, including fungus (Lihme et al., 2009; Alaniz et al., 2009), fruit plants (Hussein et al., 2008), beans (Galván et al., 2003), and green algae (Shen, 2008). This technique has been reported to be highly reproducible and to have a high level of specificity. ISSR markers have great potential and benefit in terms of studying genetic variations, phylogeny, gene tagging, genome mapping, and evolutionary biology. In addition, the ISSR PCR method has been reported to produce more complex marker patterns than the RAPD approach (Parsons et al., 1997), which is advantageous when differentiating between closely related cultivars. Moreover, the ISSR PCR approach is more reproducible than RAPD RCR, because the ISSR primers were designed to anneal to a microsatellite sequence. The ISSR PCR approach is more stable than the RAPD approach due to the fact that the primers for ISSR PCR are usually longer (16–20 bp) than those for RAPD (10 bp), which allows for a higher stringent condition. The ISSR approach has been proven to be more reliable than RAPD, because the primers of ISSR repeat sequences, can mutate more quickly than in the encoding region. If any differences appear in the genomes of the two species, they would be presented in polymorphic bands. Hence, the ISSR markers have been applied in many research studies and it is clear that the ISSR markers have great potential and could be highly beneficial in studying genetic variations, phylogeny, gene tagging, genome mapping and evolutionary biology (Wolff and Morgan-Richards, 1998; Reddy et al., 2002).
The ribulosebiphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) sequence method has been extensively used in studies of evolution, phylogeny, biogeography, population genetics, and systematics because it can be readily copied and not strikingly different for related species (Sheng-Guo et al., 2008; Doyle et al., 1997). The sequence of rbcL has been recorded in many studies and it is clear that this marker has great potential and benefit in terms of studying the genetic variations of the natural populations (Hamdam et al., 2013). This gene is far more variable in sequence. Because of the relatively rapid rate at which new mutants are fixed, these regions may be distinguished closely with other related species that otherwise would show little genetic divergence (Hamdam et al., 2013).
Our study aimed to determine the molecular identification, genetic relationships, and development of DNA markers of S. ellipsospora, using microsatellite markers and rbcL sequencing.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Spirogyra specimens
S. ellipsospora was collected from the Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. While Spirogyra sp.1, Spirogyra sp.2, Spirogyra sp.3, and Spirogyra sp.4 were collected from the Nakron Sawan, Nan, Loei, and Saraburi Provinces, Thailand, respectively. Fresh specimens were examined as wet mounts under a light microscope and were then visualized using an Olympus DP 20 Model visualizer. The length, width, number of spiral chloroplasts, and number of granules were recorded for species confirmation.
2.2. Total genomic DNA of Spirogyra extraction
Total genomic DNA of all Spirogyra specimens was extracted and purified using the modified plant tissue extraction protocol (Dellaporta et al., 1983). Analysis of DNA quality and quantity was performed by 1.4% gel electrophoresis and optical density using a spectrophotometer at 260 and 280 nm, respectively.
2.3. Issr-pcr
Total genomic DNA of Spirogyra specimens was recorded by the Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) PCR technique. Ten ISSR primers were used individually for ISSR-PCR (Table 1). PCR conditions were used as follows: 1 cycle of 94 °C for 5 min, 40 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 51 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 20 s and 1 cycle of final extension at 72 °C for 6 min, respectively.
Table 1.
Ten ISSR primers used to generate DNA fragment by PCR reactions.
| Primer | Sequence 5′ → 3′ | Length |
|---|---|---|
| UBC 807 | AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GT | 17 |
| UBC 808 | AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GC | 17 |
| UBC 809 | AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GG | 17 |
| UBC 825 | ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CT | 17 |
| UBC 826 | ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CC | 17 |
| UBC 827 | ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CG | 17 |
| UBC835 | AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GYC | 18 |
| UBC 857 | ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CYG | 18 |
| UBC864 | ATG ATG ATG ATG ATG ATG | 18 |
| UBC880 | GGA GAG GAG AGG AGA | 18 |
2.4. Amplification of the rbcL gene
Analysis of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was carried out using rbcL-F (ATGTCA CCACAAACAGAGACTAAAGC) and rbcL-R (GTAAAATCAAGTCCACCRCG) primers. PCR conditions were as follows; 1 cycle of 94 °C for 4 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s and 1 cycle of final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The 1.4% agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining was used to visualize rbcL PCR products. The sequences were performed in order for the products to be checked by the BLAST program in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database, to confirm the PCR target. The electropherograms of each sequence were examined for sequence accuracy using a Sequence Scanner version 1.0 and Bioedit version 7.1. All sequences were aligned automatically using Clustal X version 2.0.
2.5. Phylogenetic analysis
The rbcL sequences of all Spirogyra samples were determined by direct sequencing. Phylogenetic relationships among Spirogyra specimens were analyzed based on rbcL sequence data using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) in the MEGA program (version 5.0). Seven isolates of Spirogyra from the Genbank database were used to construct the phylogenetic tree (Table 2) (see Table 3).
Table 2.
List of materials and sequences of rbcL used for constructed phylogenetic analysis.
| Species of Spirogyra | References |
|---|---|
| S. ellipsospora | This study |
| S. neglecta | This study |
| Spirogyra Sp.1 | This study |
| Spirogyra Sp.2 | This study |
| Spirogyra Sp.2 | This study |
| S. ellipsospora | DQ 995996 |
| S. ellipsospora | DQ995997 |
| Spirogyra Sp. | KC779222 |
| Spirogyra Sp. | KC779220 |
| Spirogyra Sp. | KC779219 |
| S. maxima | KC779213 |
| S. maxima | KC779217 |
Table 3.
Morphological characteristic of each Spirogyra specimens.
| Details | S. ellipsospora | Sp.1 | Sp.2 | Sp.3 | Sp.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vegetative cell width (μm) | 45–90 | 40–55 | 40–60 | 41–50 | 40–60 |
| Vegetative cell length (μm) | 110–225 | 85–180 | 95–188 | 122–161 | 95–188 |
| L/W ratio vegetative cell | 2.4–2.5 | 2.13–3.27 | 2.38–3.13 | 2.97–3.22 | 2.35–3.13 |
| Number of chloroplasts | 2–3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4–5 |
| Shape of zoospore | Ellipsoid | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Zoospore width | 55–70 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Zoospore length | 80–90 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| L/W ratio zoospore | 1.3–1.4 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Shape of pyrenoid | Discoid |
Remark: ns = not seen.
3. Results
The general morphology of Spirogyra is characterized by a coiled chloroplast and a light green color. The cell is cylindrical. Apical cells are tapering, with rounded tips and thick cell walls. There are five different morphological triads of the Spirogyra specimens. The arrangement of chloroplast spirals and granules of patterns 1 and 5 was highly condensed and compacted, while patterns 2, 3 and 4 were relatively scattered, as indicated (Triads 1): condensed and slightly compacted chloroplast spiral, (Triads 2): short cell with scattered chloroplast spiral, (Triads 3): long cell with less chloroplast spiral, (Triads 4): short cell with less chloroplast spiral and (Triads 5): long cell with condensed and compacted chloroplast spiral (see Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

Five different morphological triads of Spirogyra specimens. (A) Spirogyra ellipsospora, (B) zoospore of S. ellipsospora, (C) Spirogyra sp.1, (D) Spirogyra sp.2, (E) Spirogyra sp.3, (F) Spirogyra sp.4 (scale bar = 30 μm).
In terms of the molecular investigation, ninety-two scorable markers were produced using ten ISSR primers. The cluster analysis of the ISSR markers separated S. ellipsospora, other Spirogyra species and Cladophora sp. as out-groups into two district clusters, which included (cluster 1): S. ellipsospora, Spirogyra sp.1, and Spirogyra sp.4 and (cluster 2): Spirogyra sp.3, Spirogyra sp.2, and Cladophora sp. (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.

ISSR profiles of Spirogyra (M): 100 bp marker, (SE): S. ellipsospora, (S1): Spirogyra sp.1, (S2): Spirogyra sp.2, (S3): Spirogyra sp.3, (S4): Spirogyra sp.4 and (CL): Cladophora sp.
Nucleotide amplification of rbcL revealed about 570 bp fragments in each Spirogyra specimen. Based on the rbcL sequencing data we obtained, they were trimmed to provide an equivalence sequence among each morphological triad. The specific DNA fragment of rbcL was analyzed using the BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) program in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database. Sequence data of S. ellipsospora from our study revealed definitive identity matches for S. ellipsospora for consensus sequences with 2 accession numbers of S. ellipsospora that are available on the NCBI database.
Phylogenetic trees were analyzed for the rbcL sequences using UPGMA. The phylogram could be separated into two district clusters (cluster 1): S. ellipsospora, Spirogyra sp.2, and Spirogyra maxima and (cluster 2): Spirogyra sp.1, Spirogyra sp.3, Spirogyra sp.4, and Spirogyra sp. (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

Phylogram derived from an UPGMA analysis depicting phylogenetic relationships of each morphological pattern of Spirogyra used in this study based on rbcL sequences.
4. Discussion
At present, classical morphologically based methods and molecularly based methods are used for the identification of Spirogyra specimens, which are wildly distributed throughout all parts of Thailand. However, the phenotypic traits may lead to misidentifications and they may be more sensitive than with the molecular identification approach. The Spirogyra specimens were collected and then classified into five patterns under a light microscope.
The species concept of Spirogyra is based on morphological characteristics, which are probably not accurately distinguishable in terms of classification, except by a specially trained individual (McCourt et al., 1986). Moreover, difficulties arise because they are small and soft and also have only a few stable morphological characteristics and are subject to phenotypic variations. Thus, an identification of the closely related species of Spirogyra has only been based on morphological characteristics and as a result they can be confused or misidentified.
A previous study has considered the utility of the analysis of other organisms (Métais et al., 2000). Songdong (2008) screened ISSR primers to amplified green algae, Chlorella vulgaris genomic DNA and 18 primers were found to give reproducibly amplified products. When their results were compared with ours, ten ISSR primers (UBC 809, UBC 826, UBC 835, UBC 808, UBC 825, UBC 827, UBC 864, UBC 857, UBC 880 and UBC 807) were used for the investigation of the genetic diversity of the Spirogyra specimens. Moreover, all ISSR primers can be used for the molecular markers of deference of the Spirogyra species. Hence, the ISSR primers generated highly reproducible fragments and these were further used to study the genetic relationships of the Spirogyra populations of each region of Thailand.
The ten ISSR primers amplified a total of 92 fragments, varying from 5 to 12 fragments per primer and ranged from 100 to 2800 bp. An analysis of the ISSR markers separated the five Spirogyra specimens into two distinct clusters. This result corresponds to the cluster analysis of the rbcL gene, but with fewer differences in the sister clusters. The previous reports of Ratnaparkhe et al. (1995) reported an average of 8 markers per primer in Cajanus cajan. Maciel et al. (2001) reported on the generation of RAPD fragments ranging from 7 to 31 in common beans. Such a high variation in the number of fragments produced by these primers may be attributed to the differences in the binding site throughout the genome of the genotype. Ajibade et al. (2000) reported on the generation of the ISSR fragments ranging from 4 to 12 markers in Vigna and 8 markers in Phaseolus vulgaris (Galván et al., 2003). The distribution of the different microsatellite sequences in different living genomes determined the possibility of using this method for the purpose of DNA fingerprinting. This indicates that the ISSR marker is applicable in assessing molecular relativity among species of Spirogyra.
According to our phylogenetic analysis, the partial sequences of rbcL of each Spirogyra specimen are now known, which were previously poorly known in Thailand. The molecular methods using DNA sequencing technologies have been successfully developed for studying their phylogenetic relationships and the classifications of the unknown species of living organisms. Alignment of the rbcL sequence of S. ellipsospora 1, revealed it to be 99% identical with the S. ellipsospora data in the Genbank database, while Spirogyra sp.2 revealed that it was only 93% identical with S. maxima. This result is in contrast with the results of the morphological characteristics of this sample of Spirogyra sp.2 from this investigation, according to Thiamdao (2011). Stancheva et al. (2013) studied the S. maxima in California and reported the morphological characteristics of this species as follows: (1) cell 120–150 μm in width and 90–280 μm in long, (2) 5–8 chloroplasts per cell and (3) lenticular zygospores. In addition, because the rbcL data of S. neglecta was not available in the Genbank database, the % identical of this species was analyzed with maximum identities of “S. maxima”. Therefore, from this study, new sequence data of rbcL of Spirogyra sp.2 was submitted to the NCBI databases.
An analysis of the rbcL gene confirmed the presence of five morphological patterns of Spirogyra in Thailand. The rbcL sequence obtained in this study confirmed the maximum identities compared with the sequence that was available in the Genbank databases. However, few genetic variations have been found among different patterns at the nucleotide level. Moreover, the individual Spirogyra clade found in this study is essentially the same as, and is well supported by, the bootstrap values. Drummond et al. (2005) indicated that Spirogyra is monophyletic, but still treated Sirogonium as a separate genus based on the rbcL data. They were unable to discover the morphological characteristics that were useful for a generic distinction, simply because the taxa are largely congruent (having a number of more or less loosely coiled chloroplasts, etc.). In addition, they also considered the shape and ornamentation of the chloroplast margin as a diagnostic feature, but our observations showed this characteristic to be variable and highly dependent on filament vitality. Other morphological characteristics, such as chloroplast number or cell width, are well known to be highly variable and could be related to polyploidy (Hoshow et al., 1987; Hoshaw and McCourt, 1998).
The UPGMA tree shows a group of multiples closely related to Spirogyra. The bootstrapping of the sequences indicates significant support for this group. Little genetic variations are observed among different morphological traits at the nucleotide level. Since rbcL sequences are used in the study of the phylogenetic relationships of Spirogyra, they have been used in a number of other reported studies (Hamdam et al., 2013).
The sequence data of rbcl can be used to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of Spirogyra. The analysis invariably revealed a monophyletic tree for morphological triads. Each clade of the different patterns for each morphological triad was separated into sister groups that correlated with the morphological characteristics, such as cell length, cell width, number of chloroplast spirals, and number of granules.
The phylogenetic and systematic analysis of Spirogyra can be determined by a molecular approach using the sequencing of rbcL. We have established that species-level identifications can be achieved, and rbcL analysis actually provides a phylogenetic for these algae.
In conclusion, the phylogenetic and systematic identification of Spirogyra can be determined by a molecular approach using the sequence data of rbcL. We have established that species-level identifications can be achieved, and rbcL analysis actually provides the phylogenetic data for these algae.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Applied Technology in Biodiversity Research Unit, Institute for Science and Technology Research and the Economic Plant Genomes Research and Service Center, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University for their facilities. Finally, we would like to thank Dr. Russell Kirk Hollis for editing our manuscript.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
References
- Ajibade S.R., Weeden N.F., Michite S. Inter simple sequence repeat analysis of genetic relationships in the genus Vigna. Euphytica. 2000;111:47–55. [Google Scholar]
- Alaniz S., Armengol J., Leo’n M., A-Jime’ N.G.J., Abad-Campos P. Analysis of genetic and virulence diversity of Cylindrocarpon liriodendri and C. macrodidymum associated with black foot disease of grapevine. Mycol. Res. 2009;113:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2008.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berry H.A., Lembi C.A. Effect of temperature and irradiance on the seasonal variation of a Spirogyra (Chlorophyta) population in a Midwestern Lake (USA) J. Phycol. 2000;36:841–851. [Google Scholar]
- Dellaporta S.L., Wood J., Hicks J.B. A plant DNA minipreparation Version 2. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 1993;1:19–21. [Google Scholar]
- Doyle J.J., Poyle J.L., Ballenger J.A., Dickson E.E., Kajita T., Ohashi H. A phylogenetic of the chloroplast gene rbcL in the Leguminosae: taxonomic correlations and insights into the evolution of nodulation. Am. J. Bot. 1997;84:541–554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drummond C.S., Hall J., Karol K.G., Delwiche C.F., McCourt R.M. Phylogeny of Spirogyra and Sirogonium (Zygnematophyceae) based on rbcL sequence data. J. Phycol. 2005;41:1055–1064. [Google Scholar]
- Galván M.Z., Bornet B., Balatti P.A., Branchard M. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers as a tool for the assessment of both genetic diversity and gene pool origin in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Euphytica. 2003;132:297–301. [Google Scholar]
- Hainz R., Wöber C., Schagerl M. The relationship between Spirogyra (Zygnematophyceae, Streptophyta) filament type groups and environmental conditions in Central Europe. Aquat. Bot. 2009;91:173–180. [Google Scholar]
- Hamdam N., Samad A.A., Hidyat T., Salleh F.M. Phylogenetic analysis of eight Malaysian pineapple cultivars using a chloroplast marker (rcbL gene) J. Teknolgi. 2013;64:29–33. [Google Scholar]
- Hoshaw R.W., McCourt R.M. The Zygnemataceae (Chlorophyta): a twenty year update of research. Phycologia. 1998;27:511–548. [Google Scholar]
- Hoshow R.W., Wells C.V., Mccourt R.M. A polyploidy species complex in Spirogyra maxima (Chlorophyta, Zygnemataceae), a species with large chromosomes. J. Phycol. 1987;23:267–273. [Google Scholar]
- Hussein T.S., Tawfik A.A., Khalifa M.A. Molecular identification and genetic relationships of six strawberry varieties using ISSR markers. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2008;10:677–680. [Google Scholar]
- Lihme M., Jensen A.B., Rosendahl S. Local scale population genetic structure of Entomophthora muscae epidemics. Fungal Ecol. 2009;2:81–86. [Google Scholar]
- Maciel F.L., Garald L.T.S., Echevarrigaray S. RAPD markers variability among cultivars and landraces of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of South Brazil. Euphytica. 2001;120:257–263. [Google Scholar]
- McCourt R.M., Hoshaw R.W., Wang J.C. Distribution, morphological diversity and evidence for polyploidy in North American Zygnemataceae (Chlorophyta) J. Phycol. 1986;22:307–315. [Google Scholar]
- Métais I., Aubry C., Hamon B., Jalouzot R., Peltier D. Description and analysis of genetic diversity between commercial bean lines (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Theory Appl. Gen. 2000;101:1207–1214. [Google Scholar]
- Parsons B.J., Newbury H.J., Jackson M.T., Ford-Lloyd B.V. Contrasting genetic diversity relationships are revealed in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using different marker types. Mol. Breeding. 1997;3:115–125. [Google Scholar]
- Ratnaparkhe M.B., Gupta V.S., Venmurthy M.R., Ranjekar P.K. Genetic fingerprinting of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) and its wild relatives using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Theor. Appl. Gen. 1995;91:893–898. doi: 10.1007/BF00223897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy M.P., Sarla N., Siddiq E.A. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica. 2002;128:9–17. [Google Scholar]
- Shen S. Genetic diversity analysis with ISSR PCR on green algae Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2008;26:380–384. [Google Scholar]
- Sheng-Guo J., Ke-Ke H., Jun W., Sheng-Li P. A molecular phylogenetic study of Huperziaceae based on chloroplast rbcL and psbA-trnH sequences. J. Syst. Evol. 2008;46:213–219. [Google Scholar]
- Songdong S. Genetic diversity analysis with ISSR PCR on green algae Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2008;26:380–384. [Google Scholar]
- Stancheva R., Hall J.D., McCourt R.M., Sheath R.G. Identity and phylogenetic placement of Spirogyra species. J. Phycol. 2013;49:588–607. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiamdao S. Chiang Mai University; 2011. Diversity of Edible Freshwater Macroalgae in Thailand During 2007–2008 (PhD diss.) [Google Scholar]
- Thiamdao S., Peerapornpisal Y. Morphological observation of Spirogyra ellipsosppora transeau, an edible freshwater macroalgae. J. Micros. Soc. Thailand. 2011;4(2):94–97. [Google Scholar]
- Widmer I., Dal, Grande F., Cornejo C., Scheidegger C. Highly variable microsatellite markers for the fungal and algal symbionts of the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria and challenges in developing biont-specific molecular markers for fungal associations. Fungal Biol. 2010;114:538–544. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolff K., Morgan-Richards M. PCR markers distinguish Plantago major subspecies. Theor. Appl. Gen. 1998;96:282–286. [Google Scholar]
