Abstract
Hyperammonemia is the principal consequence of urea cycle defects and liver failure, and the exposure of the brain to elevated ammonia concentrations leads to a wide range of neurocognitive deficits, intellectual disabilities, coma and death. Current treatments focus almost exclusively on either reducing ammonia levels through the activation of alternative pathways for ammonia disposal or on liver transplantation. Ammonia is toxic to most fish and its pathophysiology appears to be similar to that in mammals. Since hyperammonemia can be induced in fish simply by immersing them in water with elevated concentration of ammonia, we sought to develop a zebrafish (Danio rerio) model of hyperammonemia. When exposed to 3 mM ammonium acetate (NH4Ac), 50% of 4-day old (dpf) fish died within 3 hours and 4 mM NH4Ac was 100% lethal. We used 4 dpf zebrafish exposed to 4 mM NH4Ac to test whether the glutamine synthetase inhibitor methionine sulfoximine (MSO) and/or NMDA receptor antagonists MK-801, memantine and ketamine, which are known to protect the mammalian brain from hyperammonemia, prolong survival of hyperammonemic fish. MSO, MK-801, memantine and ketamine all prolonged the lives of the ammonia-treated fish. Treatment with the combination of MSO and an NMDA receptor antagonist was more effective than either drug alone. These results suggest that zebrafish can be used to screen for ammonia-neuroprotective agents. If successful, drugs that are discovered in this screen could complement current treatment approaches to improve the outcome of patients with hyperammonemia.
Keywords: Urea cycle, Hyperammonemia, Zebrafish, Drug screen, Neurotoxicity
1. Introduction
Ammonia is a nitrogen waste product of protein catabolism and a potent neurotoxin [1]. Six enzymes and two membrane transporters comprise the urea cycle, which converts ammonia to urea in the liver. Defects in any of the urea cycle enzymes or transporters lead to hyperammonemia, which is also a primary cause of hepatic encephalopathy due to acute and chronic liver failure [2]. Patients with hyperammonemia develop a wide range of neurocognitive abnormalities, intellectual disabilities and, in most severe cases, coma and death [3,4]. Although hyperammonemia often results in brain damage, current treatments for hyperammonemia focus almost exclusively on reducing blood ammonia levels through dietary manipulations, activation of alternative pathways of ammonia disposal or liver transplantation [5–9]. Drugs that could protect the central nervous system from damage by ammonia could transform the treatment of urea cycle disorders and also benefit patients with hepatic encephalopathy.
1.1. Ammonia toxicity to the brain
Currently, there is only a limited understanding of ammonia toxicity to the brain. Ammonia neurotoxicity has been traditionally studied in animal models of hepatic encephalopathy caused by either acute or chronic liver failure, because ammonia seems to be the most important neurotoxin in these conditions [10]. Animal models of urea cycle disorders [11–13] and animals exposed to high concentrations of ammonium salts [14–18] have also been used to study acute ammonia toxicity to the brain. These studies revealed that hyperammonemia triggers changes in metabolism, signaling pathways and gene expression. Metabolic changes associated with acute hyperammonemia include reduced levels of ATP in the brain, accumulation of lactate in the cerebrospinal fluid and increased turnover of serotonin and dopamine [10, 19]. Elevated ammonia also causes biochemical and molecular changes in the endothelial cells of the blood–brain-barrier (BBB), astrocytes and neurons (Supplemental Fig. 1). Changes within the BBB include the activation of the NF-kB transcription factor, which leads to activation of matrix metalloprotease 9 and disruption of tight junctions [20,21]. Increased ammonia levels lead to increased production of glutamine in astrocytes, which may lead to astrocyte swelling and/or disruption of their mitochondrial function [22–26]. Elevated ammonia concentration also causes disruption of the Na+K+ATPase function, which in turn results in the increased extracellular concentration of potassium ions [11,27]. This leads to over-activation of the Na+K+2Cl− co-transporter isoform 1 (NKCC1), which disrupts the function of the GABAA-receptor complex [11]. Additionally, hyperammonemia leads to elevated extracellular glutamate concentration, which leads to over-stimulation of the NMDA receptors, increased influx of Ca2+ ions, activation of NO and cGMP signaling, destruction of cellular proteins and neuronal death [16,28].
Neurotoxic effects of ammonia are not restricted to the mammalian brain. Ammonia is toxic to all fish and its effects appear to be similar in fish and mammals. Although fish genomes encode genes for all six urea cycle enzymes and two transporters [29,30], hyperammonemia can be induced in fish simply by immersing them in water with an elevated concentration of ammonia, which is transferred from the water into the blood [31–35]. The enzymatic activity of glutamine synthetase (GS) and the concentration of glutamine are increased in the brains of African sharptooth catfish, rainbow trout and gulf toadfish immersed in water containing sub-lethal concentrations of ammonia [36–38]. Exposure to ammonia also affects fish neurons; MK-801, an NMDA receptor antagonist with neuroprotective effects in hyperammonemic rats [15,39], also protects goldfish from the harmful effects of acute exposure to ammonia [40]. Similar to rats, ammonia exposure leads to increased turnover of serotonin in fathead minnows [41,42].
Increased production of glutamine by GS and activation of NMDA receptors suggests that various biomolecules that inhibit the function of these two proteins could be used as drugs to potentially protect the brain from hyperammonemia. Methionine sulfoximine (MSO) is a suicide inhibitor of GS that could prevent the accumulation of glutamine in astrocytes [43]. Although MSO extended the survival of rats with hepatic encephalopathy [44,45], it may not be suitable for use as a drug because it also provoked seizures presumably due to interference with methionine metabolism in the brain [46–48]. MSO may also have undesirable side effects due to production of toxic metabolites since it could be a substrate for the cystathionine γ-lyase, L-amino acid oxidase and glutamate cysteine ligase [49,50]. Several NMDA receptor antagonists, including the FDA-approved drug memantine, prolonged the lives of rats with hepatic encephalopathy [51]. A search for additional drugs for hyperammonemia would require an animal model of hyperammonemia that is suitable for high-throughput screens of drug libraries.
1.2. Zebrafish as an animal model for drug discovery
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) is a vertebrate model organism that is ideally suited for high-throughput drug screens. A pair of zebrafish can produce around 200 fertilized eggs on a regular basis and thus provide the large number of fish needed for screening hundreds to thousands of compounds. Because zebrafish embryos and larvae are transparent and develop outside the mother, it is easy to observe developing organs and their defects induced by chemicals or mutations [52]. Developing zebrafish embryos and larvae are permeable to small molecules [53] and their biological response to drugs, environmental toxins and small molecules are similar to those of mammals [54–58] due to conservation of cellular physiology in vertebrates [59,60]. The brain structures, neurotransmitter systems and locomotor activity are similar in zebrafish adults and larvae [61,62]. The functions of dopaminergic, glutamatergic and GABA-ergic neurons, oligodendrocytes and astrocytes in zebrafish larvae correspond to the functions of these cell types in neonatal mice [63–69]. Zebrafish larvae have been successfully used to screen for anticonvulsants [70], antidotes for organophosphates [71], psychotropic and neuroactive drugs [72], cardiotoxic compounds [73], angiogenesis drugs [74], and compounds that protect the brain from the L-hydroxyglutaric acid toxicity [75].
2. Materials and methods
The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Children’s National Medical Center approved all procedures involving zebrafish described herein.
Adult male and female zebrafish were housed in separate tanks that were kept at 28 °C and a 14 h light and 10 h dark photoperiod. Zebrafish embryos were obtained by natural, pair-wise mating, collected between 2 and 4 h after fertilization and allowed to develop for one day in 0.006% instant ocean and 0.1% methylene blue. Between seven and ten 1 day old (dpf) embryos were arrayed in 12-well plates and allowed to develop for an additional two or three days in 3 ml of blue embryo medium (BEM; 14 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM KCl, 0.025 mM Na2HPO4, 0.044 mM KH2PO4, 1.29 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM MgSO4, 4.2 mM NaHCO3 and 0.1% methylene blue). Three or four day old zebrafish larvae were treated with either sodium acetate (NaAc) or ammonium acetate (NH4Ac) at the indicated concentrations. Four day old zebrafish were treated with either 10 or 30 μM MSO, MK-801, memantine or ketamine for 20 min before the addition of either 4 mM NH4Ac or NaAc. The combined drug treatment consisted of 10 μM MSO and either 10 μM or 30 μM MK-801 for 20 min before the addition of either 4 mM NH4Ac or 4 mM NaAc. Zebrafish larvae were kept at 28 °C for the duration of experiment. Survival was scored every 20–30 min as judged by the presence/absence of a visible heartbeat. Leica MZ12.5 dissecting microscope was used to examine zebrafish larvae for heartbeats and brain appearance. Zebrafish larvae were photographed with the Leica MZ16.5 microscope equipped with Zeiss Axiocam/HrC camera and Zeiss Axiovision software package. Opaque appearance of the brain tissue is an indicator of cell death [76,77]. Experiments were repeated independently two or three times with 10–15 zebrafish larvae per treatment group, as indicated in figure legends. The Mantel–Cox log-rank test was used for statistical analysis of the data, which was carried out with Prism 6 software (GraphPad, Inc.).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Zebrafish model of hyperammonemia
Our long-term goal is to discover drugs that can protect the brain from hyperammonemia. A high throughput screen for such drugs requires a simple test of a drug’s ability to prolong survival of zebrafish exposed to high ammonia concentrations. Therefore, our immediate goal was to find the lowest NH4Ac concentration that would be 100% lethal to developing zebrafish within 2 to 3 hours. Prolonged survival at a given concentration of NH4Ac is a simple assay that can be carried out in a high throughput manner. Acute hyperammonemia was modeled in developing zebrafish by adding increasing amounts of either NH4Ac or NaAc to their water and monitoring survival using cessation of heartbeat as an endpoint. When three-day old (3 dpf) zebrafish were exposed to 1, 5, 7.5, 10 and 20 mM NH4Ac they succumbed to 10 mM and 20 mM NH4Ac within 2 h while 5 and 7.5 mM NH4Ac were 100% lethal within 3.5 h (data not shown). None of the fish exposed to 1 mM NH4Ac died during 3.5 h of observation (data not shown). Exposure of 3 dpf zebrafish to 5 mM NH4Ac leads to cell death in the brain (Figs. 1A and C), which is the likely cause of death. NaAc was not toxic to the 3 dpf fish and exposure to 5 mM NaAc did not result in visible effects (Figs. 1B and D).
Fig. 1.
Brain cell death in zebrafish larvae exposed to ammonia. 3 dpf zebrafish larvae exposed to either 5 mM NH4Ac (A and C) or 5 mM NaAc (B and D). Fish were monitored for heartbeats and photographed immediately after cessation of heartbeat in fish immersed in NH4Ac. Arrows indicate necrotic brain tissue.
Because high ammonia concentrations were needed for acute toxicity to 3 dpf fish, we tested whether four-day old (4 dpf) zebrafish larvae are more sensitive to ammonia toxicity. We found that lower concentrations of NH4Ac were lethal to 4 dpf zebrafish than to 3 dpf fish. The survival curves in Fig. 2 represent one of the three biological replicas; 50% of 4 dpf zebrafish died within 3 h when exposed to 3 mM NH4Ac, whereas, 4 mM NH4Ac was 100% lethal. Therefore exposure of 4 dpf zebrafish to 4 mM NH4AC was selected for the screen for drugs that can protect them from acute ammonia toxicity.
Fig. 2.

Survival of 4 dpf zebrafish immersed in NH4Ac. Fish were monitored for heartbeats every 30 min. Each survival curve represents one of three biological replicas with similar results.
The 3 dpf fish appeared to have a degree of tolerance to acute exposure to ammonia. To confirm this, we tested survival of 3 dpf and 4 dpf zebrafish larvae at different concentrations of NH4Ac. Fig. 3 shows that 3 dpf fish survive longer than 4 dpf fish when exposed to 3, 4 and 5 mM NH4Ac respectively. All fish immersed in 3, 4 and 5 mM NaAc survived (data not shown). Greater tolerance of ammonia in 3 dpf zebrafish could be due to greater ability to convert ammonia into urea at three days than at four days post fertilization [78, 79]. Alternatively, biomolecules and pathways in the brain that are affected by high ammonia may not yet be present or susceptible in 3 dpf zebrafish.
Fig. 3.

Survival of 3 dpf and 4 dpf zebrafish exposed to ammonia. Zebrafish larvae were exposed to 3, 4 and 5 mM NH4Ac. Each survival curve represents one of three biological replicates with similar results.
3.2. Protection of zebrafish larvae from ammonia toxicity
We sought to determine whether mechanisms of ammonia toxicity in developing zebrafish could be similar to those documented in gold-fish and mammals. Therefore, we tested whether NMDA-receptor antagonists and MSO prolong survival of 4 dpf zebrafish exposed to high ammonia. The fish were first exposed to two doses (10 μM and 30 μM) of the GS inhibitor, MSO, and three NMDA receptor antagonists, MK-801, memantine and ketamine, followed by the addition of 4 mM NH4Ac. All four compounds were effective in prolonging the survival of 4 dpf zebrafish in 4 mM NH4Ac (Figs. 4A–D). Higher doses of all three NMDA receptor antagonists appeared to be even more effective in protecting 4 dpf zebrafish from ammonia toxicity (Figs. 4B–D) whereas 30 μM MSO appeared to be less protective than 10 μM MSO (Fig. 4A). None of the tested compounds were in and of themselves toxic, since fish survival was not affected by exposure to MSO, MK-801, memantine and ketamine in 4 mM NaAc (data not shown). These observations suggest that certain concentrations of MSO combined with exposure to ammonia may be toxic to developing zebrafish. Increased survival of zebrafish larvae in the presence of MSO and NMDA receptor antagonists is not surprising because their targets, GS and NMDA receptors, are expressed in 4 dpf fish [80,81]. The zebrafish genome encodes three GS paralogs: glula, glulb and glulc [82]. While glulc is expressed in adult zebrafish [82], expression of both glula and glulb in 4 dpf zebrafish is restricted to the brain, retina and peripheral nervous system [81], and the two genes encode functional enzymes, GSa and GSb, with 94% amino acid similarity. The GSb protein abundance and enzymatic activity increase when adult zebrafish are placed in hyperammonemic conditions [82]. Our finding that MSO mitigates ammonia-induced toxicity in zebrafish larvae would be consistent with the block of glutamine accumulation in astrocytes due to the inhibition of glutamine synthetase activity in the brains of 4 dpf zebrafish. Zebrafish have ten genes that encode subunits of the NMDA receptor [80] due to genome duplication that occurred in the teleost lineage [83–85]. The amino acid sequences of the NMDA receptor 1 subunits from zebrafish are more than 90% identical to the corresponding human proteins while zebrafish NMDA receptor 2 subunits have between 35 and 50% sequence identity to the human homologs [80]. The role of NMDA receptors in brain function and the effects of MK-801, ketamine and memantine on learning, memory and behavior appear to be similar in zebrafish and mammals [86–94]. This suggests that mechanism(s) of neuroprotection against hyperammonemia by NMDA receptor antagonists may also be similar in zebrafish and mammals.
Fig. 4.
Survival of 4 dpf fish treated with either MSO or NMDA receptor antagonists and then exposed to NH4Ac. Zebrafish larvae were treated with either 10 μM or 30 μM MSO (A and E), MK-801 (B and F), memantine (C and G) and ketamine (D and H) for 20 min followed by addition of either 4 mM NH4Ac. Fish were monitored for heartbeats every 20–30 min. Solid black line — survival of fish in 4 mM NH4Ac; dashed gray line — survival in 10 μM drug and 4 mM NH4Ac; solid gray line — survival in 30 μM drug and 4 mM NH4Ac. Survival curves represent one of two biological replicates with similar results.
Because MSO and NMDA-receptor antagonists protect the brain from ammonia toxicity by different mechanisms [15,39,44,45,51], we tested whether the combination of MSO and MK-801 is more effective in prolonging the survival of 4 dpf zebrafish in 4 mM NH4Ac than either drug alone. Only the lower dose of MSO was tested because 30 μM MSO appeared to be less effective than 10 μM MSO in protecting zebrafish from ammonia toxicity. The combination of 10 μM MK-801 together with 10 μM MSO indeed protected 4 dpf zebrafish from ammonia toxicity better than either drug alone (Fig. 5A). Similarly, treatment with 30 μM MK-801 and 10 μM MSO was more effective than either drug alone, although the added benefit of combining 10 μM MSO with a 30 μM MK-801 treatment is less striking than with a 10 μM MK-801 treatment (compare Fig. 5B to A). Synergistic protection of developing zebrafish by MSO and MK-801 is consistent with the effects of ammonia on multiple pathways and cell types in the brain.
Fig. 5.

Survival of 4 dpf zebrafish treated with either MSO or MK-801 or both drugs and exposed to NH4Ac. A. 4 dpf zebrafish were treated with 10 μM MK-801 (dashed dark gray line), 10 μM MSO (dashed light gray line) or 10 μM MK-801 and 10 μM MSO (solid gray line) for 20 min followed by addition of 4 mM NH4Ac. Control fish were treated with NH4Ac alone (solid black line). Fish were monitored for the presence of heartbeat every 20–30 min. B. 4 dpf zebrafish were treated with 30 μM MK-801 (dashed dark gray line), 10 μM MSO (dashed light gray line) or 30 μM MK-801 and 10 μM MSO (solid gray line) for 20 min followed by addition of 4 mM NH4Ac. Control fish were treated with NH4Ac alone (solid black line). Fish were monitored for heartbeats every 20–30 min. Survival curves represent one of two biological replicates with similar results.
4. Concluding remarks
Despite our still rudimentary understanding of the mechanisms of ammonia toxicity to the brain, available data suggest that biomolecules such as GS, NMDA receptors, the NLCC1 co-transporter and possibly the GABAA receptor are affected by elevated ammonia and might therefore be effectively targeted with drugs to achieve neuroprotection. Preclinical studies in mice with hyperammonemia have shown effectiveness of the FDA-approved drugs memantine, ketamine and bumetanide in mitigating the toxic effects of hyperammonemia [11,15,39,51]. There may be other FDA-approved drugs that could be used to protect the brain from hyperammonemia. However, identifying such drugs would require a high-throughput screening approach. Our studies suggest that zebrafish larvae are well suited for high throughput chemical screen for drugs that protect against hyperammonemia because zebrafish brain cells appear to be as sensitive to ammonia as the human brain. Moreover, since zebrafish larvae have a fully functioning central nervous system [95] and BBB [96,97], they should be well suited for the identification of drugs with distinct mechanisms of neuroprotection against ammonia toxicity and for the subsequent testing of whether combinations of distinctly acting drugs have synergistic effects.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy National Institute for Child Health and Human Development and by the Public Health Service grant R21 DK099476.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.07.001.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Brusilow SW, Horwich AL. Urea Cycle Enzymes. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The Metabolic & Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. McGraw-Hill; 2001. pp. 1909–1963. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Belanger M, Butterworth RF. Acute liver failure: a critical appraisal of available animal models. Metab Brain Dis. 2005;20:409–423. doi: 10.1007/s11011-005-7927-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brusilow SW, Koehler RC, Traystman RJ, Cooper AJ. Astrocyte glutamine synthetase: importance in hyperammonemic syndromes and potential target for therapy. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7:452–470. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2010.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mew NAh, Caldovic L. N-acetylglutamate synthase deficiency: an insight into the genetics, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Appl Clin Genet. 2011;4:127–135. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S12702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Batshaw ML, Brusilow S, Waber L, Blom W, Brubakk AM, Burton BK, Cann HM, Kerr D, Mamunes P, Matalon R, Myerberg D, Schafer IA. Treatment of inborn errors of urea synthesis: activation of alternative pathways of waste nitrogen synthesis and excretion. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1387–1392. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198206103062303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Batshaw ML, MacArthur RB, Tuchman M. Alternative pathway therapy for urea cycle disorders: twenty years later. J Pediatr. 2001;138:S46–S54. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.111836. (discussion S54-45) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brusilow SW. Phenylacetylglutamine may replace urea as a vehicle for waste nitrogen excretion. Pediatr Res. 1991;29:147–150. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199102000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Burlina AB, Ogier H, Korall H, Trefz FK. Long-term treatment with sodium phenylbutyrate in ornithine transcarbamylase-deficient patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2001;72:351–355. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2001.3156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haeberle J, Boddaert N, Burlina A, Chakrapani A, Dixon M, Huemer M, Karall D, Martinelli D, Sanjurjo Crespo P, Santer R, Servais A, Valayannopoulos V, Lindner M, Rubio V, Dionisi-Vici C. Suggested guidelines for the diagnosis and management of urea cycle disorders. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:32. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Butterworth RF. Altered glial-neuronal crosstalk: cornerstone in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy. Neurochem Int. 2010;57:383–388. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rangroo Thrane V, Thrane AS, Wang F, Cotrina ML, Smith NA, Chen M, Xu Q, Kang N, Fujita T, Nagelhus EA, Nedergaard M. Ammonia triggers neuronal disinhibition and seizures by impairing astrocyte potassium buffering. Nat Med. 2013;19:1643–1648. doi: 10.1038/nm.3400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ratnakumari L, Audet R, Qureshi IA, Butterworth RF. Na+,K+-ATPase activities are increased in brain in both congenital and acquired hyperammonemic syndromes. Neurosci Lett. 1995;197:89–92. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(95)11906-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lichter-Konecki U, Mangin JM, Gordish-Dressman H, Hoffman EP, Gallo V. Gene expression profiling of astrocytes from hyperammonemic mice reveals altered pathways for water and potassium homeostasis in vivo. Glia. 2008;56:365–377. doi: 10.1002/glia.20624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cauli O, Lopez-Larrubia P, Rodrigues TB, Cerdan S, Felipo V. Magnetic resonance analysis of the effects of acute ammonia intoxication on rat brain. Role of NMDA receptors. J Neurochem. 2007;103:1334–1343. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04878.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hermenegildo C, Marcaida G, Montoliu C, Grisolia S, Minana MD, Felipo V. NMDA receptor antagonists prevent acute ammonia toxicity in mice. Neurochem Res. 1996;21:1237–1244. doi: 10.1007/BF02532401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hermenegildo C, Monfort P, Felipo V. Activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in rat brain in vivo following acute ammonia intoxication: characterization by in vivo brain microdialysis. Hepatology. 2000;31:709–715. doi: 10.1002/hep.510310322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kosenko E, Kaminski Y, Lopata O, Muravyov N, Felipo V. Blocking NMDA receptors prevents the oxidative stress induced by acute ammonia intoxication. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26:1369–1374. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00339-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kosenko E, Venediktova N, Kaminsky Y, Montoliu C, Felipo V. Sources of oxygen radicals in brain in acute ammonia intoxication in vivo. Brain Res. 2003;981:193–200. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)03035-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Felipo V, Butterworth RF. Neurobiology of ammonia. Prog Neurobiol. 2002;67:259–279. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Konopacka A, Zielinska M, Albrecht J. Ammonia inhibits the C-type natriuretic peptide-dependent cyclic GMP synthesis and calcium accumulation in a rat brain endothelial cell line. Neurochem Int. 2008;52:1160–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Skowronska M, Zielinska M, Wojcik-Stanaszek L, Ruszkiewicz J, Milatovic D, Aschner M, Albrecht J. Ammonia increases paracellular permeability of rat brain endothelial cells by a mechanism encompassing oxidative/nitrosative stress and activation of matrix metalloproteinases. J Neurochem. 2012;121:125–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07669.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brusilow SW, Maestri NE. Urea cycle disorders: diagnosis, pathophysiology, and therapy. Adv Pediatr. 1996;43:127–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jayakumar AR, Norenberg MD. Endothelial-astrocytic interactions in acute liver failure. Metab Brain Dis. 2013;28:183–186. doi: 10.1007/s11011-012-9344-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Suarez I, Bodega G, Fernandez B. Glutamine synthetase in brain: effect of ammonia. Neurochem Int. 2002;41:123–142. doi: 10.1016/s0197-0186(02)00033-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Swain MS, Blei AT, Butterworth RF, Kraig RP. Intracellular pH rises and astrocytes swell after portacaval anastomosis in rats. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:R1491–R1496. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1991.261.6.R1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Willard-Mack CL, Koehler RC, Hirata T, Cork LC, Takahashi H, Traystman RJ, Brusilow SW. Inhibition of glutamine synthetase reduces ammonia-induced astrocyte swelling in rat. Neuroscience. 1996;71:589–599. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00462-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xue Z, Li B, Gu L, Hu X, Li M, Butterworth RF, Peng L. Increased Na, K-ATPase alpha2 isoform gene expression by ammonia in astrocytes and in brain in vivo. Neurochem Int. 2010;57:395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Saransaari P, Oja SS, Borkowska HD, Koistinaho J, Hilgier W, Albrecht J. Effects of thioacetamide-induced hepatic failure on the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex in the rat cerebral cortex, striatum, and hippocampus. Binding of different ligands and expression of receptor subunit mRNAs. Mol Chem Neuropathol. 1997;32:179–193. doi: 10.1007/BF02815175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Haskins N, Panglao M, Qu Q, Majumdar H, Cabrera-Luque J, Morizono H, Tuchman M, Caldovic L. Inversion of allosteric effect of arginine on N-acetylglutamate synthase, a molecular marker for evolution of tetrapods. BMC Biochem. 2008;9:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2091-9-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Amemiya CT, Alfoldi J, Lee AP, Fan S, Philippe H, Maccallum I, Braasch I, Manousaki T, Schneider I, Rohner N, Organ C, Chalopin D, Smith JJ, Robinson M, Dorrington RA, Gerdol M, Aken B, Biscotti MA, Barucca M, Baurain D, Berlin AM, Blatch GL, Buonocore F, Burmester T, Campbell MS, Canapa A, Cannon JP, Christoffels A, De Moro G, Edkins AL, Fan L, Fausto AM, Feiner N, Forconi M, Gamieldien J, Gnerre S, Gnirke A, Goldstone JV, Haerty W, Hahn ME, Hesse U, Hoffmann S, Johnson J, Karchner SI, Kuraku S, Lara M, Levin JZ, Litman GW, Mauceli E, Miyake T, Mueller MG, Nelson DR, Nitsche A, Olmo E, Ota T, Pallavicini A, Panji S, Picone B, Ponting CP, Prohaska SJ, Przybylski D, Saha NR, Ravi V, Ribeiro FJ, Sauka-Spengler T, Scapigliati G, Searle SM, Sharpe T, Simakov O, Stadler PF, Stegeman JJ, Sumiyama K, Tabbaa D, Tafer H, Turner-Maier J, van Heusden P, White S, Williams L, Yandell M, Brinkmann H, Volff JN, Tabin CJ, Shubin N, Schartl M, Jaffe DB, Postlethwait JH, Venkatesh B, Di Palma F, Lander ES, Meyer A, Lindblad-Toh K. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature. 2013;496:311–316. doi: 10.1038/nature12027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Avella M, Bornancin M. A new analysis of ammonia and sodium transport through the gills of the freshwater rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) J Exp Biol. 1989;142:155–175. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cameron JN. Responses to reversed NH3 and NH4+ gradients in a teleost (Ictalurus punctatus), an elasmobranch (Raja erinacea), and a crustacean (Callinectes sapidus): evidence for NH4+/H+ exchange in the teleost and the elasmobranch. J Exp Zool. 1986;239:183–195. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402390206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Claiborne JB, Evans DH. Ammonia and acid–base balance during high ammonia exposure in a marine teleost (Myoxocephalus Octodecimspinosus) J Exp Biol. 1988;140:89–105. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wilson RW, Taylor EW. Transbranchial ammonia gradients and acid-base responses to high external ammonia concentration in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) acclimated to different salinities. J Exp Biol. 1992;166:95–112. doi: 10.1242/jeb.166.1.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fromm PO, Gillette JR. Effect of ambient ammonia on blood ammonia and nitrogen excretion of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) Comp Biochem Physiol. 1968;26:887–896. doi: 10.1016/0010-406x(68)90008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wee NL, Tng YY, Cheng HT, Lee SM, Chew SF, Ip YK. Ammonia toxicity and tolerance in the brain of the African sharptooth catfish,Clarias gariepinus. Aquat Toxicol. 2007;82:204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Veauvy CM, McDonald MD, Van Audekerke J, Vanhoutte G, Van Camp N, Van der Linden A, Walsh PJ. Ammonia affects brain nitrogen metabolism but not hydration status in the Gulf toadfish (Opsanus beta) Aquat Toxicol. 2005;74:32–46. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wright PA, Steele SL, Huitema A, Bernier NJ. Induction of four glutamine synthetase genes in brain of rainbow trout in response to elevated environmental ammonia. J Exp Biol. 2007;210:2905–2911. doi: 10.1242/jeb.003905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Marcaida G, Felipo V, Hermenegildo C, Minana MD, Grisolia S. Acute ammonia toxicity is mediated by the NMDA type of glutamate receptors. FEBS Lett. 1992;296:67–68. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80404-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ip YK, Leong MW, Sim MY, Goh GS, Wong WP, Chew SF. Chronic and acute ammonia toxicity in mudskippers, Periophthalmodon schlosseri and Boleophthalmus boddaerti: brain ammonia and glutamine contents, and effects of methionine sulfoximine and MK801. J Exp Biol. 2005;208:1993–2004. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lozeva V, Montgomery JA, Tuomisto L, Rocheleau B, Pannunzio M, Huet PM, Butterworth RF. Increased brain serotonin turnover correlates with the degree of shunting and hyperammonemia in rats following variable portal vein stenosis. J Hepatol. 2004;40:742–748. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ronan PJ, Gaikowski MP, Hamilton SJ, Buhl KJ, Summers CH. Ammonia causes decreased brain monoamines in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) Brain Res. 2007;1147:184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Meister A. Catalytic mechanism of glutamine synthetase; overview of glutamine metabolism. In: Mora J, Palacios R, editors. Glutamine Metabolism, Enzymology, and Regulation. Academic Press; New York: 1980. pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tanigami H, Rebel A, Martin LJ, Chen TY, Brusilow SW, Traystman RJ, Koehler RC. Effect of glutamine synthetase inhibition on astrocyte swelling and altered astroglial protein expression during hyperammonemia in rats. Neuroscience. 2005;131:437–449. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.10.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jambekar AA, Palma E, Nicolosi L, Rasola A, Petronilli V, Chiara F, Bernardi P, Needleman R, Brusilow WS. A glutamine synthetase inhibitor increases survival and decreases cytokine response in a mouse model of acute liver failure. Liver Int. 2011;31:1209–1221. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schatz RA, Sellinger OZ. Effect of methionine and methionine sulphoximine on rat brain S-adenosyl methionine levels. J Neurochem. 1975;24:63–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1975.tb07628.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sellinger OZ, Azcurra JM, Ohlsson WG. Methionine sulfoximine seizures. 8. The dissociation of the convulsant and glutamine synthetase inhibitory effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1968;164:212–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sellinger OZ, Schatz RA, Porta R, Wilens TE. Brain methylation and epileptogenesis: the case of methionine sulfoximine. Ann Neurol. 1984;16(Suppl):S115–S120. doi: 10.1002/ana.410160717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cooper AJ, Stephani RA, Meister A. Enzymatic reactions of methionine sulfoximine. Conversion to the corresponding alpha-imino and alpha-keto acids and to alpha-ketobutyrate and methane sulfinimide. J Biol Chem. 1976;251:6674–6682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Griffith OW, Meister A. Differential inhibition of glutamine and gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetases by alpha-alkyl analogs of methionine sulfoximine that induce convulsions. J Biol Chem. 1978;253:2333–2338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cauli O, Rodrigo R, Boix J, Piedrafita B, Agusti A, Felipo V. Acute liver failure-induced death of rats is delayed or prevented by blocking NMDA receptors in brain. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;295:G503–G511. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00076.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Haffter P, Nusslein-Volhard C. Large scale genetics in a small vertebrate, the zebrafish. Int J Dev Biol. 1996;40:221–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Parng C, Seng WL, Semino C, McGrath P. Zebrafish: a preclinical model for drug screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2002;1:41–48. doi: 10.1089/154065802761001293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Peterson RT, Link BA, Dowling JE, Schreiber SL. Small molecule developmental screens reveal the logic and timing of vertebrate development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:12965–12969. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.24.12965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lam SH, Mathavan S, Tong Y, Li H, Karuturi RK, Wu Y, Vega VB, Liu ET, Gong Z. Zebrafish whole-adult-organism chemogenomics for large-scale predictive and discovery chemical biology. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lam SH, Winata CL, Tong Y, Korzh S, Lim WS, Korzh V, Spitsbergen J, Mathavan S, Miller LD, Liu ET, Gong Z. Transcriptome kinetics of arsenic-induced adaptive response in zebrafish liver. Physiol Genomics. 2006;27:351–361. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00201.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lam SH, Wu YL, Vega VB, Miller LD, Spitsbergen J, Tong Y, Zhan H, Govindarajan KR, Lee S, Mathavan S, Murthy KR, Buhler DR, Liu ET, Gong Z. Conservation of gene expression signatures between zebrafish and human liver tumors and tumor progression. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:73–75. doi: 10.1038/nbt1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yang L, Kemadjou JR, Zinsmeister C, Bauer M, Legradi J, Muller F, Pankratz M, Jakel J, Strahle U. Transcriptional profiling reveals barcode-like toxicogenomic responses in the zebrafish embryo. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R227. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chen JN, Fishman MC. Zebrafish tinman homolog demarcates the heart field and initiates myocardial differentiation. Development. 1996;122:3809–3816. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.12.3809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen JN, Haffter P, Odenthal J, Vogelsang E, Brand M, van Eeden FJ, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Hammerschmidt M, Heisenberg CP, Jiang YJ, Kane DA, Kelsh RN, Mullins MC, Nusslein-Volhard C. Mutations affecting the cardiovascular system and other internal organs in zebrafish. Development. 1996;123:293–302. doi: 10.1242/dev.123.1.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hortopan GA, Dinday MT, Baraban SC. Zebrafish as a model for studying genetic aspects of epilepsy. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3:144–148. doi: 10.1242/dmm.002139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lambert AM, Bonkowsky JL, Masino MA. The conserved dopaminergic diencephalospinal tract mediates vertebrate locomotor development in zebrafish larvae. J Neurosci. 2012;32:13488–13500. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1638-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mueller T, Vernier P, Wullimann MF. A phylotypic stage in vertebrate brain development: GABA cell patterns in zebrafish compared with mouse. J Comp Neurol. 2006;494:620–634. doi: 10.1002/cne.20824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kawai H, Arata N, Nakayasu H. Three-dimensional distribution of astrocytes in zebrafish spinal cord. Glia. 2001;36:406–413. doi: 10.1002/glia.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Szobota S, Gorostiza P, Del Bene F, Wyart C, Fortin DL, Kolstad KD, Tulyathan O, Volgraf M, Numano R, Aaron HL, Scott EK, Kramer RH, Flannery J, Baier H, Trauner D, Isacoff EY. Remote control of neuronal activity with a light-gated glutamate receptor. Neuron. 2007;54:535–545. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Delgado L, Schmachtenberg O. Immunohistochemical localization of GABA, GAD65, and the receptor subunits GABAAalpha1 and GABAB1 in the zebrafish cerebellum. Cerebellum. 2008;7:444–450. doi: 10.1007/s12311-008-0047-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Klooster J, Yazulla S, Kamermans M. Ultrastructural analysis of the glutamatergic system in the outer plexiform layer of zebrafish retina. J Chem Neuroanat. 2009;37:254–265. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2009.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mueller T, Wullimann MF. An evolutionary interpretation of teleostean forebrain anatomy. Brain Behav Evol. 2009;74:30–42. doi: 10.1159/000229011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wullimann MF, Rink E. Detailed immunohistology of Pax6 protein and tyrosine hydroxylase in the early zebrafish brain suggests role of Pax6 gene in development of dopaminergic diencephalic neurons. Dev Brain Res. 2001;131:173–191. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(01)00270-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Berghmans S, Hunt J, Roach A, Goldsmith P. Zebrafish offer the potential for a primary screen to identify a wide variety of potential anticonvulsants. Epilepsy Res. 2007;75:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2007.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jin S, Sarkar KS, Jin YN, Liu Y, Kokel D, Van Ham TJ, Roberts LD, Gerszten RE, Macrae CA, Peterson RT. An in vivo zebrafish screen identifies organophosphate antidotes with diverse mechanisms of action. J Biomol Screen. 2012;18:108–115. doi: 10.1177/1087057112458153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rihel J, Prober DA, Arvanites A, Lam K, Zimmerman S, Jang S, Haggarty SJ, Kokel D, Rubin LL, Peterson RT, Schier AF. Zebrafish behavioral profiling links drugs to biological targets and rest/wake regulation. Science. 2010;327:348–351. doi: 10.1126/science.1183090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Milan DJ, Peterson TA, Ruskin JN, Peterson RT, MacRae CA. Drugs that induce repolarization abnormalities cause bradycardia in zebrafish. Circulation. 2003;107:1355–1358. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000061912.88753.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chan J, Bayliss PE, Wood JM, Roberts TM. Dissection of angiogenic signaling in zebrafish using a chemical genetic approach. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:257–267. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00042-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Parng C, Ton C, Lin YX, Roy NM, McGrath P. A zebrafish assay for identifying neuroprotectants in vivo. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006;28:509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Abdelilah S, Mountcastle-Shah E, Harvey M, Solnica-Krezel L, Schier AF, Stemple DL, Malicki J, Neuhauss SC, Zwartkruis F, Stainier DY, Rangini Z, Driever W. Mutations affecting neural survival in the zebrafish Danio rerio. Development. 1996;123:217–227. doi: 10.1242/dev.123.1.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Jao LE, Wente SR, Chen W. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:13904–13909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308335110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bucking C, Lemoine CM, Walsh PJ. Waste nitrogen metabolism and excretion in zebrafish embryos: effects of light, ammonia, and nicotinamide. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2013;319:391–403. doi: 10.1002/jez.1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Caldovic L, Haskins N, Mumo A, Majumdar H, Pinter M, Tuchman M, Krufka A. Expression pattern and biochemical properties of zebrafish N-acetylglutamate synthase. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Cox JA, Kucenas S, Voigt MM. Molecular characterization and embryonic expression of the family of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit genes in the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2005;234:756–766. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Rauch GJ, Lyons DA, Middendorf I, Friedlander B, Arana N, Reyes T, Talbot WS. Submission and curation of gene expression data. ZFIN Direct Data Submission. 2003 ( http://zfin.org)
- 82.Dhanasiri AK, Fernandes JM, Kiron V. Glutamine synthetase activity and the expression of three glul paralogues in zebrafish during transport. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;163:274–284. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2012.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Postlethwait JH, Woods IG, Ngo-Hazelett P, Yan YL, Kelly PD, Chu F, Huang H, Hill-Force A, Talbot WS. Zebrafish comparative genomics and the origins of vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res. 2000;10:1890–1902. doi: 10.1101/gr.164800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Postlethwait JH, Yan YL, Gates MA, Horne S, Amores A, Brownlie A, Donovan A, Egan ES, Force A, Gong Z, Goutel C, Fritz A, Kelsh R, Knapik E, Liao E, Paw B, Ransom D, Singer A, Thomson M, Abduljabbar TS, Yelick P, Beier D, Joly JS, Larhammar D, Rosa F, Westerfield M, Zon LI, Johnson SL, Talbot WS. Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nat Genet. 1998;18:345–349. doi: 10.1038/ng0498-345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Taylor JS, Van de Peer Y, Braasch I, Meyer A. Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication event in fish. Phil Trans R Soc London. 2001;356:1661–1679. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Blank M, Guerim LD, Cordeiro RF, Vianna MR. A one-trial inhibitory avoidance task to zebrafish: rapid acquisition of an NMDA-dependent long-term memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92:529–534. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Burgess HA, Granato M. Sensorimotor gating in larval zebrafish. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4984–4994. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0615-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chen J, Patel R, Friedman TC, Jones KS. The behavioral and pharmacological actions of NMDA receptor antagonism are conserved in zebrafish larvae. Int J Comp Psychol. 2010;23:82–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Riehl R, Kyzar E, Allain A, Green J, Hook M, Monnig L, Rhymes K, Roth A, Pham M, Razavi R, Dileo J, Gaikwad S, Hart P, Kalueff AV. Behavioral and physiological effects of acute ketamine exposure in adult zebrafish. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2011;33:658–667. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2011.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Seibt KJ, da Oliveira RL, Zimmermann FF, Capiotti KM, Bogo MR, Ghisleni G, Bonan CD. Antipsychotic drugs prevent the motor hyperactivity induced by psychoto-mimetic MK-801 in zebrafish (Danio rerio) Behav Brain Res. 2010;214:417–422. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sison M, Gerlai R. Associative learning performance is impaired in zebrafish (Danio rerio) by the NMDA-R antagonist MK-801. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011;96:230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Swain HA, Sigstad C, Scalzo FM. Effects of dizocilpine (MK-801) on circling behavior, swimming activity and place preference in zebrafish (Danio rerio) Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004;26:725–729. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Xu X, Scott-Scheiern T, Kempker L, Simons K. Active avoidance conditioning in zebrafish (Danio rerio) Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007;87:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Best JD, Berghmans S, Hunt JJ, Clarke SC, Fleming A, Goldsmith P, Roach AG. Non-associative learning in larval zebrafish. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:1206–1215. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203:253–310. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002030302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Jeong JY, Kwon HB, Ahn JC, Kang D, Kwon SH, Park JA, Kim KW. Functional and developmental analysis of the blood–brain barrier in zebrafish. Brain Res Bull. 2008;75:619–628. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.10.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Xie J, Farage E, Sugimoto M, Anand-Apte B. A novel transgenic zebrafish model for blood–brain and blood–retinal barrier development. BMC Dev Biol. 2010;10:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-10-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


