Abstract
The temporal bone encases conductive and sensorineural elements of the ear. Mutations of POU3F4 are associated with unique temporal bone abnormalities and X-linked mixed deafness (DFNX2/DFN3). However, the target genes and developmental processes controlled by POU3F4 transcription factor activity have remained largely uncharacterized. Ephrin-B2 (Efnb2) is a signaling molecule with well-documented effects on cell adhesion, proliferation, and migration. Our analyses of targeted mouse mutants revealed that Efnb2 loss-of-function phenocopies temporal bone abnormalities of Pou3f4 hemizygous null neonates: qualitatively identical malformations of the stapes, styloid process, internal auditory canal, and cochlear capsule were present in both mutants. Using failed/insufficient separation of the stapes and styloid process as a quantitative trait, we found that single gene Efnb2 loss-of-function and compound Pou3f4/Efnb2 loss-of-function caused a more severe phenotype than single gene Pou3f4 loss-of-function. Pou3f4 and Efnb2 gene expression domains overlapped at the site of impending stapes-styloid process separation and at subcapsular mesenchyme surrounding the cochlea; at both these sites, Efnb2 expression was attenuated in Pou3f4 hemizygous null mutants relative to control. Results of immunoprecipitation experiments using chromatin isolated from nascent middle ear mesenchyme supported the hypothesis of a physical association between Pou3f4 and specific non-coding sequence of Efnb2. We propose that Efnb2 is a target of Pou3f4 transcription factor activity and an effector of mesenchymal patterning during temporal bone development.
Introduction
Paired temporal bones at the sides and base of the skull house conductive and sensori-neural components of the peripheral auditory system [1]. The tympanic part (middle ear) is air-filled and contains structures that conduct sound energy to the cochlea: the tympanic membrane, auditory ossicles (malleus, incus, stapes), muscles, and ligaments (Fig. 1A). The petrous portion of the temporal bone (bony capsule) encases inner ear sensory end organs and neuronal ganglia within a labyrinthine space, and forms canals for passage of cranial nerves and major vessels. It protects the auditory-vestibular system and contributes to the architecture of partitioned, fluid-filled spaces that comprise the inner ear.
Various parts of the temporal bone form by either endochondral or intramembranous ossification [2]. The auditory ossicles and petrous portion form by endochondral ossification, and in mice, these structures are cartilaginous at the time of birth. The petrous portion and its developmental precursor (cartilaginous otic capsule) derive from head mesoderm [3]. The distal ossicles (malleus and incus) derive from cranial neural crest [4]. The stapes is of mixed origin [5]; head and crura derive exclusively from neural crest, and the footplate is a mixed derivative of neural crest and head mesoderm (Fig. 1B).
Genetic classification of otologic conditions and identification of pathogenic gene mutations provide insights into temporal bone development. X-linked mixed (conductive and sensorineural) progressive deafness with stapes fixation and perilymphatic gusher (a profuse discharge of inner ear and cerebrospinal fluid) correlates with unique temporal bone abnormalities (cochlear hypoplasia; dilated internal auditory canal) upon radiological examination [6]–[9]. The genetic locus for this non-syndromic form of deafness (DFNX2, formerly DFN3; OMIM 304400) maps to Xq21.1 [10] and is associated with mutations of coding or regulatory sequence for the POU3F4 gene [11], [12]. POU family transcription factors bind to DNA in a sequence-specific manner through the bipartite motif of POU homeodomain and POU-specific domains [13]. In the mouse, Pou3f4 is expressed in mesenchyme surrounding the embryonic inner ear epithelium, and targeted mutagenesis of Pou3f4 causes multiple developmental malformations of the ear, including cochlear hypoplasia, thin cochlear bony capsule (petrous temporal bone), dilated internal auditory canal, and malformed stapes [14]–[16]. Mice lacking Pou3f4 also show abnormalities of specialized fibrocytes apposed to the bony cochlear wall, a dramatically reduced endolymph potential, and profound deafness, suggesting that loss of Pou3f4 disrupts cochlear fluid homeostasis [17], [18]. However, very little is known about target genes that mediate the effects of Pou3f4 on ear development.
Ephrin-B2 (Efnb2) encodes a Type I transmembrane protein that functions as a cell contact-dependent ligand for multiple Eph receptor tyrosine kinases. Upon binding to a cognate Eph protein, Efnb2 can also function cell-autonomously by signaling from its cytoplasmic domain through SH2 and PDZ domain-containing adaptor proteins [19], [20]. Eph/ephrin-B signaling influences cell migration, progenitor cell sorting, and tissue boundary formation in the developing embryo through effects on cytoskeletal organization and adhesion between adjacent cells [21], [22]. Eph/ephrin-B signaling also controls cell proliferation in the embryo and adult stem cell niches of mice [23]–[27]. Recent evidence indicates that Pou3f4 transcription factor regulates Eph-ephrin signaling: Pou3f4 in mesenchyme surrounding the cochlea binds to specific non-coding sequence of Epha4 and is necessary for proper expression of Epha4 [28], the product of which is a canonical receptor for Efnb2 [21]. This regulation is associated with proper fasciculation of axons that innervate the cochlea [28]. Here, we report on temporal bone morphologies of single and compound Pou3f4 and Efnb2 loss-of-function mutants, developmental gene expression in wild type and mutant embryos, and anti-Pou3f4-mediated pull-down of Efnb2 sequence from chromatin of the embryonic ear. The results provide evidence that Efnb2 is a direct effector of Pou3f4 activity during temporal bone development.
Results
Adult Pou3f4 Cre/Y mice exhibit defects of the stapes, facial canal, internal auditory canal, and bony capsule of the cochlea
Mutant mice wherein cre replaces the coding region of Pou3f4 (resulting in a null allele of Pou3f4) were previously characterized with respect to spiral ganglion development [28]. We analyzed excised temporal bones from 16–20 week old Pou3f4 Cre/Y hemizygous null males (n = 40) and wild-type male littermate controls (n = 62). The stapedio-vestibular (S–V) joint, which forms a functional interface between middle and inner ear chambers, comprises articular surfaces of the stapes footplate and oval window of the inner ear bony capsule (Fig. 1A, B). At the S–V joint of wild-type controls, articular surfaces were closely apposed and joined by elastic fibers; collectively, these fibers form the annular ligament (Fig. 2A, C, E) [29]. By contrast, all mutant footplates were disarticulated from the oval window to varying degrees (Fig. 2B, D), with both footplate hypoplasia and oval window dysplasia contributing to the defect. Severely affected ‘floating’ footplates (Fig. 2D) were tethered to the oval window by a thin elastin- and collagen-containing membrane (Fig. 2F). Less affected regions of the mutant S-V joint showed disorganized elastic fibers, irregular articular surfaces, and reduced thickness of footplate and oval window bone compared to controls (Fig. 2E, F′). The entire mutant cochlear bony labyrinth was abnormally thin (Fig. 2A, B; arrows) and fragile upon dissection.
The facial canal is a bony sulcus running along the dorsal aspect of the middle ear cavity; it contains the stapedius muscle and a segment of the VIIth cranial nerve (Fig. 1A), tissues that mediate the acoustic reflex and modify stapes mobility. Compared to controls, Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutant stapes were shifted dorsally and set more closely to the facial canal (data not shown). In 45% of mutant ears analyzed (18/40), a thin sheath of periostium connected the dorsal crus of the stapes to an abnormal prominence on the lateral wall of the facial canal (Fig. 3A–D); this soft tissue bridge always co-occurred with an intact stapedial tendon and did not grossly limit stapes mobility as assessed by palpation. In 33% of mutant ears analyzed (13/40), this same region of the dorsal crus was fused to the lateral wall of the facial canal by a bone bridge (Fig. 3E, F), causing an immobile stapes. All mutant ears with a bony coalition lacked the stapedial tendon.
To assess the validity of scoring individual temporal bones in generating data sets (denoted as ‘occurrence’ of a defect, where n = the number of temporal bone specimens), we analyzed phenotypic penetrance by tabulating the prevalence of every possible combination of stapes-facial canal connections (unilateral vs. bilateral; soft tissue vs. bone) in the sample of Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutants (n = the number of mutant animals sampled; Table S1). The distribution did not deviate significantly from the case where each category is equally prevalent (P = 0.6526, Chi-square 3.308; 5 df). This supports the assumption that stapes-facial canal connection type (soft or bone) and unilaterality/bilaterality of the defect within an individual are independent events. No left- or right-sided bias was noted among animals with a unilateral defect.
At the medial side of the temporal bone, the internal auditory canal comprises three foramina for passage of VIIth and VIIIth cranial nerve branches between the bony labyrinth and brain. Pou3f4 null hemizygosity caused incomplete septation and dilation of these foramina (Fig. S1A, B), as previously shown [14]. Together, these results extend previous characterizations [14], [15], [30] of bony defects in the Pou3f4 mutant ear.
Most temporal bone defects of Pou3f4 Cre/Y mice are evident at the endochondral cartilage stage of development
We next investigated the developmental origins of Pou3f4 Cre/Y temporal bone defects. Analyses of normally developing middle ears between post-natal days 5 and 15 indicated that the lateral wall of the facial canal is formed by fusion and growth of the endochondral styloid process and intramembranous tympanic ring (Fig. 1, S2). At perinatal stages, the styloid process is a rod of cartilage extending from the dorso-lateral aspect of the inner ear capsule (Fig. 3K, arrowheads; Fig S2A, D, G). To determine whether bony fixation of the stapes and facial canal in Pou3f4 Cre/Y adults is caused by ossification of an abnormal cartilage rudiment, we analyzed serial sections of Pou3f4 Cre/Y (n = 22) and wild-type (n = 17) temporal bones from E18.5-P0 littermates. All wild-type ossicles were discrete, cartilaginous structures enveloped by perichondrium and surrounded by loose mesenchyme or a developing joint space (Fig. 3G, J). However, in 36% of perinatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y ears analyzed (8/22), the cartilaginous dorsal crus and styloid process were connected (Fig. 3I), and the stapedius muscle and tendon were present but dysmorphic (Fig. 3G, I, arrowheads). In 32% of the perinatal mutant ears analyzed (7/22), distance between the unconnected stapes and styloid process was markedly reduced compared to control and a common perichondrium enveloped both structures (Fig. 3H, arrow). Thus, the Pou3f4 Cre/Y perinatal-stage phenotype can be categorized as a partially or fully coalesced stapes and styloid process. The relative occurrence of these defects in our perinatal stage sample did not differ from the relative occurrence of soft and bone bridges identified in adult mutants (Table 1; Chi-square 1.152; df, 2; P = .5622; also see Table S1). Thus, the soft tissue bridge and bone bridge abnormalities identified in adult Pou3f4 Cre/Y mice are likely consequences of perinatal ‘close proximity/common perichondrium’ and ‘continuous cartilage’ abnormalities, respectively. Other malformations evident in neonatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutants included a thin cochlear cartilage capsule (Fig. 3G–I, asterisks) and dilation/incomplete septation of the internal auditory canal (Fig. S1D, E). However, we found no perinatal cartilage abnormality that might account for S–V joint disarticulation observed in adult mutants (data not shown). Thus, a subset of Pou3f4 Cre/Y temporal bone malformations is manifested at the cartilaginous stage of endochondral bone formation. These results are consistent with immunohistochemical evidence of Pou3f4 activity during early phases of periotic mesenchymal patterning and/or condensation [31].
Table 1. Occurrence of stapes-facial canal or -styloid connectivity in Pou3f4 Cre/Y and Efnb2 CKO mice.
Genotype/Stage | n a | Soft Tissue Bridge | Bone or Cartilage Bridge | Total Affected |
Pou3f4 Cre/Y adult | 40 | 18 (.45) | 13 (.33) | 31 (.78) |
Pou3f4 Cre/Y neonate | 22 | 7 (.32) | 8 (.36) | 15 (.68) |
Efnb2 CKO fetal (E19) | 20 | 2 (.10) | 14 * (.70) | 16 (.80) |
sample size refers to the number of ears analyzed.
* P = 0.0365, compared to Pou3f4 Cre/Y neonate by Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance set at P<0.05.
Efnb2 and Pou3f4 mRNA signals overlap in mesenchyme surrounding the VIIth nerve, condensing stapes, spiral ganglion, and cochlear duct
Periotic mesenchymal patterning and condensation in the mouse are evident between stages E11 and E13.5 [32], and we identified Efnb2 mRNA surrounding periotic mesenchymal condensations during these and later stages of development (Fig. 4A, D). At E13.5, Efnb2 and Pou3f4 mRNA expression patterns in the developing middle ear were complementary and partially overlapping. Overlap was noted in mesenchyme apposed to the stapes footplate, within the developing S–V joint, dorsal to the stapes, and surrounding the VIIth nerve (Fig. 4A, B). Efnb2 and Pou3f4 signals also overlapped in sub-capsular mesenchyme surrounding the cochlear duct and spiral ganglion, as previously shown [28]. Efnb2 and Pou3f4 expression was complementary across the lateral wall of the cochlear capsule (Fig. 4A, B; denoted by c). As previously shown [14], [28], [31], Pou3f4 was not expressed in the developing inner ear epithelium, spiral ganglion, or mesenchyme surrounding the incus and malleus, all of which express Efnb2.
By RNA hybridization, we first detected Efnb2 signal in the nascent middle ear between E11.5 and E12.5; at E12.5, Efnb2 and Pou3f4 signals overlapped in branchial arch mesenchyme dorsal to the stapedial artery and surrounding the VIIth cranial nerve (Fig. 5A, B). At E16.5, Pou3f4 signal intensity in mesenchyme surrounding the stapes had decreased relative to earlier stages, whereas Efnb2 signal within the developing S–V joint had intensified relative to earlier stages (Fig. 4A, B, D, E); conversely, Efnb2 signal in E16.5 cochlear subcapsular mesenchyme was weak compared to earlier stages, whereas Pou3f4 signal remained robust in mesenchyme surrounding the E16.5 cochlea and spiral ganglion.
In summary, Efnb2 and Pou3f4 mRNA signals show the greatest degree of overlap between stages E12.5 and E13.5, as periotic mesenchyme is patterned and condensed into pre-chondrogenic rudiments (Fig. 5C, D). Overlap of signals between stages E12.5 and E13.5 occurs at sites relevant to the Pou3f4 Cre/Y stapes phenotype described above.
Sox9-IRES-Cre-mediated inactivation of Efnb2 phenocopies cartilage abnormalities of the perinatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y ear
To assess the function of Efnb2 in ossicular development, we inactivated Efnb2 broadly in mesenchymal and epithelial components of the ear using the Sox9-IRES-Cre driver (Fig. 5E; S3) [24]. Sox9-IRES-Cre+;Efnb2 flox/null (Efnb2 CKO) pups were delivered live, but died within 12 hours of birth. Alcian blue-stained whole skeletal preparations of late-stage Efnb2 CKO fetuses had no obvious axial, appendicular, or craniofacial deformities. However, of 20 Efnb2 CKO ears analyzed at E19 by either histological or whole mount cartilage/bone staining, 14 showed complete coalition of the stapes and styloid process and 2 showed reduced distance between stapes and styloid process cartilages and a shared perichondrium (Fig. 3K–N). These phenotypes were morphologically indistinguishable from those of the perinatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y male (compare Fig. 3M, N and H, I). The total occurrence of all identified stapes abnormalities in the fetal Efnb2 CKO sample (Table 1, Total Affected; see also Table S1) did not differ from that of the perinatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y sample (P = 0.4913; Fisher's exact test). However, the occurrence of a fully connected stapes-styloid cartilage bridge phenotype in the fetal Efnb2 CKO sample was increased over that of the perinatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y male by roughly 2-fold (P = 0.0365; Fisher's exact test). Other endochondral cartilage-stage temporal bone defects observed in both Efnb2 CKO and Pou3f4Cre/Y mutants included a thin cochlear cartilaginous capsule compared to control (Fig. 3G, H, I, M, N, asterisks) and dilation/incomplete septation of the internal auditory canal (Fig. S1D–F). As with neonatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y mice, we found no abnormality at the developing S–V joint in stage E19 Efnb2 CKO fetuses (data not shown). Distal ossicles (incus and malleus) in the Efnb2 CKO were judged to be of normal size and morphology. Together, these results indicate that Sox9-IRES-Cre-mediated loss of Efnb2 phenocopies cartilage abnormalities of the perinatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y ear.
We next analyzed a sample of E19 fetuses homozygous for an Efnb2 C-terminal truncation (ephrin-B2LacZ mice in [33]–[35]). This allele produces an Efnb2:ß-galactosidase fusion protein that is targeted to the plasma membrane and binds cognate EphB receptors on adjacent cells, but is unable to transduce signals to the cytoplasmic side of the membrane; thus, it can provide evidence of whether a phenotype is due to a specific loss of (forward) signaling through an Eph receptor or (reverse) signaling through the Efnb2 C-terminus. Histological analyses of 7 ears from 5 Efnb2 C-terminal deletion homozygotes revealed neither a coalesced stapes-styloid process nor reduced distance between the two structures, and other components of the developing middle ear appeared normal (Fig. S4). These results suggest that the Efnb2 C-terminus is dispensable in forming separate stapes and styloid process cartilages during development.
Compound loss of Efnb2 and Pou3f4 potentiates the Pou3f4 Cre/Y adult stapes phenotype
Recapitulation and increased severity of the perinatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y stapes-styloid defect in Sox9-IRES-Cre+;Efnb2 flox/null E19 fetuses prompted us to ask whether Pou3f4 Cre/Y;Efnb2 flox/null compound mutant mice are viable and exhibit a more severe middle ear phenotype than that of Pou3f4 Cre/Y adult mice. We therefore generated and analyzed the series of compound mutant phenotypes listed in Table 2. Analyses of Pou3f4-Cre;ROSA-YFP mice revealed that this cross should inactivate the floxed Efnb2 allele in subcapsular cochlear mesenchyme, mesenchyme within the forming S–V joint, and branchial arch mesenchyme dorsal to the stapes and surrounding the VIIth nerve (Fig. 5F; data not shown). Pou3f4-Cre-mediated Efnb2 CKO mice were viable through at least 6 months of age. We therefore analyzed the ears of 16–20 week old adult male mice. This allowed for rapid categorization of the stapes phenotype as either a soft tissue bridge or bone bridge, as well as an assessment of the S-V joint and internal auditory canal. All compound mutants were of the same mixed genetic background as the Pou3f4 Cre/Y males described above (see Materials and Methods, Animals).
Table 2. Occurrence of stapes-facial canal connectivity in adult Pou3f4 and Efnb2 single and compound mutant mice.
Genotype | n a | Soft Tissue Bridge | Bone Bridge | Total Affected |
Pou3f4 Cre/Y; Efnb2 +/+ | 40 | 18 (.45) | 13 (.33) | 31 (.78) |
Pou3f4 Cre/Y; Efnb2 +/flox | 38 | 9 (.24) | 13 (.34) | 22 (.57) |
Pou3f4 Cre/Y; Efnb2 null/+ | 32 | 10 (.31) | 8 (.25) | 18 (.56) |
Pou3f4 Cre/Y; Efnb2 null/flox | 39 | 1** (.03) | 23* (.59) | 24 (.62) |
Pou3f4 +/Y; Efnb2 null/+ | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pou3f4 +/Y; Efnb2 +/+ | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
sample size refers to the number of ears analyzed.
* 0.02<P<0.05;
** p<0.0001; all pairwise Fisher's exact tests were performed relative to the Pou3f4 Cre/Y; Efnb2 +/+ genotype. Statistical significance set at P<0.05.
Table 2 shows genotypes and categorical data for the stapes-facial canal abnormality. No such abnormalities were observed in a sample of Efnb2 null heterozygote temporal bones (Pou3f4 +/Y; Efnb2 null/+ or Pou3f4 +/Y; Efnb2 null/flox, n = 30), so these genotypes were excluded from further analyses. A Chi-square test of independence on the remaining data shown in Table 2 indicated that the variables of genotype and phenotype are related (Chi-square = 23.82; df = 6; P = 0.0006). Pair-wise comparisons between Pou3f4 Cre/Y; Efnb2 +/+ and Pou3F4 Cre/Y; Efnb2 +/flox or Pou3F4 Cre/Y; Efnb2 null/+ genotypes revealed no differences in occurrence for any category (soft tissue bridge; bone bridge; and total affected, ie., soft + bony connections), indicating that Efnb2 heterozygosity does not potentiate the Pou3f4 hemizygous null stapes-facial canal phenotype. Comparisons between Pou3f4 Cre/Y;Efnb2 +/+ and Pou3f4 Cre/Y;Efnb2 null/flox genotypes revealed that the total occurrence of affected stapes (Total Affected) was similar across genotypes (P = 0.1471; Fisher's exact test). However, the sample of mice lacking both genes had a roughly 2-fold increase in occurrence of bony connections over that of Pou3f4 Cre/Y hemizygous null males (P = 0.0243; Fisher's exact test) and a decrease in soft tissue connections compared to Pou3f4 Cre/Y hemizygous null males (P <0.0001; Fisher's exact test). In analyzing penetrance of phenotypic categories for the Pou3f4 Cre/Y;Efnb2 null/flox sample, we found that the distribution for all six possible categories does deviate from the case where each category is equally prevalent (P = 0.0419, Chi-square: 11.53, 5 df), but bilateral and unilateral bony defects (which dominate the distribution) are equally prevalent in the sample (P >0.7232, by Chi-square or Fisher's exact test; Table S1). In summary, compound Pou3f4 null hemizygosity;Efnb2 conditional null homozygosity biases expressivity of the Pou3f4 Cre/Y stapes-facial canal defect toward the more severe form (bone bridge) independently of its bilateral or unilateral configuration. Severity of defects at the S–V joint and internal auditory canal were judged to be similar across Pou3f4 Cre/Y;Efnb2 +/+ and Pou3f4 Cre/Y;Efnb2 null/flox genotypes (Fig. S1B, C; data not shown).
Eph receptor gene expression foreshadows borders of distinct middle ear structures
As described in a previous section, we found no stapes-styloid defects in a small sample of Efnb2 C-terminal deletion mutants, so Efnb2 may function as a ligand to activate Eph receptor (forward) signaling [19]–[21] in the present context. We surveyed the middle ear rudiment for expression of Ephb1, Ephb2, Ephb3, Ephb4, and Epha4, each of which encodes a cognate receptor for Efnb2. Sox9 hybridization signal, a marker of osteo-chondroprogenitor cells [36], was used in conjunction with histological appearance and anatomical landmarks to identify territories of nascent middle ear rudiments. Of the set of Eph receptor genes tested, Ephb4 was expressed widely throughout developing middle ear mesenchyme between E11.5 and E13.5 (data not shown), whereas Epha4 and Ephb2 were expressed in patterns that foreshadow borders of distinct middle ear structures.
At E11.5, Epha4 mRNA signal marked a lateral region of the nascent middle ear and appeared to overlap slightly with Pou3f4 signal in mesenchyme adjacent to the anterior cardinal vein (Fig. 6A–C, E). By E13, Epha4 signal had intensified lateral to the stapes and VIIth nerve and formed a domain complementary to that of Pou3f4 (Fig. 7A, D, M, P). By E14.5, Epha4 signal was detected in loose mesenchyme surrounding the ossicular condensations (Fig. 7C, F).
At E11.5, Ephb2 mRNA signal marked a medial region of the nascent middle ear, with strong signal in mesenchyme dorsal to the stapedial artery and surrounding the VIIth cranial nerve; this overlapped with a portion of Pou3f4 signal (Fig. 6B, D, F). By E13.5, strong Ephb2 signal surrounding the VIIth nerve had resolved to a medial-lateral coursing stripe just dorsal to the stapes. The Ephb2 stripe overlapped with Pou3f4 and Efnb2 signals at E13.5 (Fig. 7H, K, N), prior to detectable cartilage matrix deposition in the stapes condensation (Fig. 7B, C). At E14.5, Ephb2 and Pou3f4 signals dorsal to the stapes were attenuated relative to earlier stages (Fig. 7I, O). Pou3f4-Cre;ROSA-YFP genetic labeling at E14.5 recapitulated the medial-lateral coursing stripe dorsal to the stapes (Fig. 7R).
In summary, Epha4 mRNA signal distinguishes lateral middle ear rudiments (incus, malleus) from the more medially situated stapes, VIIth nerve, and cardinal vein; at E13.5, the Epha4 domain border defines an apparent plane at which the stapes head and incus will articulate (Fig. 7Q, red dots, compare with Fig. 7E). By contrast, Ephb2 mRNA signal distinguishes the stapes from more dorsally situated rudiments, such as otic capsule surrounding the vestibular canals, VIIth nerve, and styloid process (Fig. 7Q, cyan dots, compare with Fig. 7H).
Pou3f4 Cre/Y null hemizygosity dysregulates Efnb2 and Sox9 expression dorsal to the stapes
The mutant phenotypes described above, together with co-localization of Ephb2, Efnb2, and Pou3f4 in a stripe distinguishing the nascent stapes from more dorsally located rudiments, led us to ask whether Pou3f4 is required for normal expression of Efnb2, Ephb2, or Epha4 in the developing middle ear. We hybridized serial sections of E13–13.5 Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutant and Pou3f4 +/Y wild-type littermates with RNA probes and rated the extent and intensity of signals in the region of interest. We found no consistent differences in Epha4 (4 littermate pairs) or Ephb2 (6 littermate pairs) signals across genotypes. However, all Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutants (from 6 littermate pairs) showed a reduced intensity of Efnb2 signal immediately dorsal to the stapes and surrounding the VIIth nerve (Fig. 8A, A′, B, B′; S5), as well as in subcapsular mesenchyme surrounding the cochlear epithelium and spiral ganglion (Fig. S6). By contrast, Efnb2 signals at sites outside the domain of Pou3f4 expression – the stapedial artery or malleus/incus rudiment, for example - were unchanged across genotypes (Fig. 8A, A′, B, B′; S5). In a converse experiment, we assayed Pou3f4 expression by RNA hybridization to E13–13.5 Efnb2 CKO and control embryos (5 littermate pairs) and found no differences in Pou3f4 signal across genotypes (Fig. 8C, C′,D, D′).
To determine whether attenuated Efnb2 signal dorsal to the Pou3f4 Cre/Y stapes correlates with failed separation of pre-cartilaginous mesenchymal condensations, we assessed Sox9 hybridization signal in Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutant and Pou3f4 +/Y wild-type littermate pairs. In E12.5 wild-type embryos, the chondrogenic marker Sox9 formed a continuous domain comprising Meckel's (1st branchial arch) cartilage, the malleus/incus territory, stapes condensation, otic capsule condensation, styloid process territory, and Reichert's (2nd branchial arch) condensation (Fig. S7). Continuity of Sox9 expression across the stapes and styloid process condensations was maintained until E13.5 (Fig. 4C, F; black arrowheads), but all E14.5 wild-type embryos (4/4) showed a sharply bordered region of Sox9 negativity dorsal to the stapes and adjacent to the VIIth nerve (Fig. 8E, E′). E14.5 Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutants did not have a sharply bordered region of Sox9 negativity dorsal to the stapes (0/4); instead, a continuous Sox9 signal of graded intensity – similar to the Sox9 pattern in normal E13.5 ears - persisted in the E14.5 mutants (Fig. 8F, F′). In summary, these results are consistent with a model in which Pou3f4 lies upstream of Efnb2 in a genetic hierarchy, and attenuated Efnb2 expression in the Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutant is causal for insufficient separation of stapes and styloid process rudiments prior to the onset of local cartilage matrix deposition.
Pou3f4 protein associates with the Efnb2 locus in nascent middle ear mesenchyme
To determine whether Pou3f4 physically interacts with the Efnb2 locus in nascent middle ear mesenchyme, we first scanned the Efnb2 genomic locus on mouse chromosome 8 for putative Pou3f4 DNA binding/regulatory motifs [37]. Six consensus motifs (ATTATTA) were distributed across intronic regions of Efnb2 (Fig. 9A). Motifs at sites 3, 5, and 6 were fully conserved across two or more species (mouse/rat or mouse/rat/human), and the site 1 motif, though non-conserved, was localized to an intronic region of high phylogenetic conservation. We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) on sites 1, 3, 5, 6, as well as a non-consensus site (NC), using purified chicken anti-Pou3f4 IgY antibody and purified non-specific IgY as a negative control condition [28]. This was followed by SYBR-green-based qPCR and absolute quantification (see Materials and Methods) to measure concentrations of Efnb2 target sequences in the anti-Pou3f4 and control IgY IPs. Chromatin was obtained from either E12.25 middle ear mesenchyme or E10.5 limb mesenchyme, the latter of which lacks detectable expression of Pou3f4 [31], [38]. Differences in target sequence concentration across paired experimental (anti-Pou3f4) and control (IgY) sample sets were assessed for each site/tissue combination.
Site 1, 3, 5, 6, and NC target concentrations in anti-Pou3f4 (experimental) and IgY (control) eluates were statistically indistinguishable using immunoprecipitated chromatin from limb mesenchyme (Fig. 9B; data not shown). Likewise, using immunoprecipitated chromatin from middle ear mesenchyme, site 1, 5, and NC target concentrations in anti-Pou3f4 and IgY eluates were statistically indistinguishable (Fig. 9B). Site 3 could not be evaluated statistically in middle ear chromatin eluates due to lack of fluorescence signal across 40 PCR cycles in roughly one-half of the assays. However, experimental and control eluates of middle ear chromatin differed significantly in their concentrations of target site 6 (p = 0.008; Wilcoxon signed rank test), with anti-Pou3f4 eluates showing a 5.5 fold average enrichment over IgY eluates (Fig. 9B). These results suggest that Pou3f4 transcription factor physically associates with specific non-coding sequence of the Efnb2 locus during early stages of middle ear development.
Discussion
Pou3f4 and Efnb2 function within a common pathway to promote temporal bone development
Our results indicate that Efnb2 lies downstream of Pou3f4 in a genetic pathway governing embryonic-stage development of the mouse temporal bone. Previous work demonstrates that Pou3f4 transcript and gene product are expressed in proximal branchial mesenchyme (where the stapes and styloid process will form) and in mesenchyme surrounding the nascent cochlea as early as E10.5 [31]. Although Efnb2 is expressed in early migrating cranial neural crest cells [39], we could not - by mRNA hybridization - identify Efnb2 transcript in mesenchyme surrounding the otic epithelium until after E11.5. We found qualitatively identical malformations of the stapes, styloid process, internal auditory canal, and cochlear capsule in both Pou3f4 Cre/Y and (Sox9-IRES-Cre-mediated) Efnb2 CKO perinates, and – between E12.5 and E14.5 - Efnb2 and Pou3f4 expression overlapped in mesenchyme that contributes to the formation of these structures. In mesenchyme surrounding the E13 stapes and cochlear rudiments, Efnb2 expression was attenuated in the Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutant compared to control, but Pou3f4 expression appeared unaltered by conditional loss of Efnb2. Conditional loss of Efnb2 (by Sox9-IRES-Cre) correlated with a 2-fold greater occurrence of full stapes-styloid process coalition than that of Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutants; this is consistent with the finding that Efnb2 signal is attenuated (rather than eliminated) in mesenchyme surrounding the Pou3f4 Cre/Y stapes rudiment. Adult double mutants lacking both Pou3f4 and Efnb2 (Pou3f4 Cre/Y;Efnb2 flox/null) also displayed a 2-fold increased occurrence of stapes-facial canal bony coalition over adult Pou3f4 Cre/Y single gene mutants. Thus, with respect to this phenotypic feature, the effect of losing both genes appears to be neither additive nor synergistic compared to loss of Efnb2 alone.
We also provide evidence that, at the developing mouse middle ear, Efnb2 transcription is potentiated by a physical interaction between Pou3f4 and the Efnb2 locus. Pou3f4 protein is localized to nuclei of prospective middle ear mesenchyme cells by E11.5 [31]. Using chromatin isolated from E12.25 nascent middle ear mesenchyme, we found a 5.5 fold enrichment of specific intronic sequence near the 3′ end of Efnb2 in anti-Pou3f4 eluate compared to IgY eluate. The relatively modest (though statistically significant) magnitude of fold increase may be due to the following factors. Our manual dissection undoubtedly captured a heterogeneous isolate, with Pou3f4+:Efnb2+ cells forming a small minority of cells from which chromatin was obtained. Efnb2 signal in the region of interest (surrounding the stapes and within the domain of Pou3f4) was attenuated but not entirely eliminated in the Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutant, indicating that Pou3f4 activity is not an absolute requirement for Efnb2 expression at this site. Transcriptional regulation of Efnb2 is complex, as evidenced by ChIP and transactivation analyses of the 5′ promoter region in cultured mouse arterial endothelial cells [40]. This study [40] revealed strong transactivation of Efnb2 from the 5′ promoter region by a TALE homeodomain superfamily member, Meis1. In chicken embryos of equivalent maturity to E12.5–13.5 mouse, Meis1 is expressed broadly in proximal 2nd brachial arch mesenchyme encompassing the stapes rudiment and surrounding structures [41]. In E14.5 mouse, Meis1 is strongly and widely expressed in mesenchyme surrounding the ossicles [42]. These considerations suggest a model wherein region-specific potentiation of Efnb2 expression in periotic/branchial mesenchyme occurs through specific binding of Pou3f4 to 3′ intronic sequence.
We focused our ChIP and quantitative genetic analyses on the middle ear (stapes-styloid/facial canal region in particular) because the phenotype was efficiently scored by careful inspection of whole temporal bone preparations, and this allowed adequate sample sizes for statistical comparisons of multiple mutant genotypes. However, additional qualitative similarities between Pou3f4 and Efnb2 mutant phenotypes described here (e.g., thin cochlear capsule; dilated internal auditory canal) and the finding of attenuated Efnb2 mRNA signal in cochlear subcapsular mesenchyme of Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutants compared to that of control (Fig. S6) raise the question of whether Pou3f4-mediated Efnb2 regulation has a more comprehensive role in temporal bone development. A previous study indicates that Epha4, encoding a cognate receptor for Efnb2, is a direct target of Pou3f4 transcription factor within cochlear sub-capsular mesenchyme [28]. This regulatory relationship is associated with mesenchyme-dependent fasciculation of spiral (VIIIth) ganglion axons. It is therefore reasonable to ask whether Pou3f4 directly coordinates temporal-spatial patterns of transcription for cognate Eph and ephrin genes, the products of which then mediate developmental events through ligand-receptor interaction. By RNA in situ hybridization, we were unable to detect altered expression of Ephb2 or Epha4 at the developing Pou3f4 Cre/Y middle ear. More sensitive techniques for assessing change in Eph receptor transcript levels may be required in future studies, as we found overlapping expression of Pou3f4 and Ephb2 in mesenchyme dorsal to the stapes and multiple Pou3f4 DNA binding site motifs distributed across non-coding regions of the Ephb2 gene (Coate and Raft, unpublished observations).
How the genetic regulatory mechanism proposed here affects cellular behavior during ear development remains to be determined. Genetic fate mapping in the mouse reveals that both the stapes crura/head and styloid process derive from 2nd pharyngeal arch neural crest [4], [5]. Embryological studies of humans [43]–[45] and rodents [46], [47] indicate that discrete bony elements of the middle ear originate by splitting of one or more continuous mesenchymal condensations. We have shown that a continuous domain of mesenchymal Sox9 gene expression encompasses primordia of the ossicles, styloid process, and otic capsule at stage E12.5. In Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutant embryos, attenuated Efnb2 mRNA signal correlated with failure to properly pattern or downregulate Sox9 mRNA signal between the nascent stapes and styloid process rudiments. It is therefore possible that Eph-Efnb2 signaling promotes splitting of a continuous mesenchymal condensation into separate elements through effects on gene expression, cell adhesion and re-arrangement, or some combination of these processes. Our evidence to date suggests that the stapes-styloid phenotype of Sox9-IRES-Cre-mediated Efnb2 CKO embryos is caused by a loss of forward signaling through one or more cognate Eph receptors, as we failed to find this phenotype in perinatal mouse mutants lacking only the Efnb2 C-terminus.
Reverse genetics offers insight into the etiology of DFNX2/DFN3 conductive hearing loss
Conductive hearing loss is typically due to inefficient transfer of sound energy through the middle ear. However, the precise anatomical bases for conductive hearing loss in humans with POU3F4 mutations and DFNX2/DFN3 remain in question. Early reports of DFNX2/DFN3-type patients cite congenital fixation of the stapes footplate or absence of the annular ligament as causing conductive hearing loss [48], [49]. Other investigators attribute reduced (or absent) stapes mobility to increased perilymph fluid pressure within the bony capsule, which could result from a widened internal auditory canal and abnormal communication with the sub-dural space [6], [50], [51]. More recently, it has been proposed that the dilated internal auditory canal and other bony abnormalities characteristic of DFNX2/DFN3 dissipate acoustic energy at the level of the inner ear and amplify bone-conducted sounds [52], [53]. This so-called ‘third-window effect’ confounds interpretation of routine audiometric testing and causes ‘inner ear conductive hearing loss’, which can occur in the presence of a normally functioning middle ear [54].
We found the internal auditory canal of perinatal Pou3f4 Cre/Y and Efnb2 CKO mutants to be dilated and dysmorphic at the cartilaginous stage of temporal bone development, thus extending previous findings on the adult Pou3f4 mutant temporal bone [14]. By contrast, we found no apparent malformation of the developing stapes footplate/oval window in either mutant at perinatal stages, suggesting that the footplate/oval window dysplasia of adult Pou3f4 hemizygous null males arises during post-natal ossification or bone remodeling. The stapes footplate/oval window dysplasia observed in our sampling of adult Pou3f4 Cre/Y and Pou3f4 Cre/Y;Efnb2 flox/null temporal bones is consistent with previous observations of Pou3f4 hemizygous null mice by Samadi et al. [55], but is inconsistent with reports of stapes footplate fixation in DFNX2/DFN3 patients [48], [49]. Rather than a footplate fixation, the Pou3f4 Cre/Y, Pou3f4 Cre/Y:Efnb2 flox/null, and Sox9-IRES-Cre-mediated Efnb2 CKO stapes was immobilized by a bony and/or cartilaginous connection to the facial canal/styloid process. In humans, this so-called supra-structure fixation of the stapes dorsal crus and facial canal is rare and of unknown genetic etiology [56].
What might account for the apparent differences in stapes/oval window/facial canal morphology across mice and humans lacking Pou3f4/POU3F4 activity? Variation in the developmental regulation of Pou3f4/POU3F4 expression is one likely explanation. Breakpoint analyses of DFNX2/DFN3 microdeletions, cross-species non-coding sequence comparisons, and transgenic activities of putative cis regulatory sequences suggest that the temporal-spatial pattern of Pou3f4/POU3F4 expression during ear development is a composite of multiple 5′ cis-enhancer activities; phylogenetically conserved enhancers are distributed across a 1Mb region and respond differentially to major signaling pathways in model organism transgenic assays [12], [57]–[59]. It is also relevant that a supra-structure fixation of the stapes and styloid process/facial canal has not previously been identified in mice carrying other null alleles of Pou3f4 [14], [15], [17], and the question of whether genetic background influences stapes morphology in mice lacking Pou3f4 has been raised [15]. Here again, developmental gene expression requiring integration of many signals across a vast 5′ regulatory region may be susceptible to background-specific modifiers. Finally, DFNX2/DFN3 anatomy may be incompletely characterized, given the small number of cases that have been documented radiologically and lack of post-mortem temporal bone pathology studies.
Fixation of the stapes and styloid process/facial canal is found in other targeted mouse mutants. Mice heterozygous for the BMP antagonist noggin show genetic background-specific and incompletely penetrant coalition of the stapes and styloid process/facial canal without other apparent temporal bone defects [60]. By contrast, Wnt1-Cre-mediated inactivation of the endothelin-A receptor can result in coalition of the stapes and styloid process in the context of a severely dysmorphic middle ear and jaw [61]. The current model of early-stage jaw development places Endothelin-1 and BMP signaling upstream of several transcription factor families (Dlx, Msx, Hand) that pattern dorso-ventral axes of the 1st and 2nd pharyngeal arches [62]. Dlx transcription factors are required for proper expression of another POU family transcription factor gene, Pou3f3, in pharyngeal arch mesenchyme, and Pou3f3 loss-of-function causes coalition of the stapes and styloid process [63]. Functional redundancy of Pou3f3 and Pou3f4 is another reasonable explanation for the lack of a reported stapes fixation in previous characterizations of Pou3f4 mutants, and may also explain the variable expressivity/incomplete penetrance of stapes-styloid process coalition in the sample of Pou3f4 Cre/Y mutants characterized here.
To date, no association exists between EFNB2 mutations and a human disease or congenital defect. Complete loss of the human gene activity may cause early embryonic lethality due to failed remodeling of the primary embryonic vasculature into a system of arteries and veins, as is the case in the mouse [39], [64]. However, a growing list of roles for Efnb2 in forming the murine auditory-vestibular system [24], [28], [35], [65], [66] raises the possibility that regulatory or hypomorphic mutations of EFNB2 underlie functional variation in human hearing and balance.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Pou3f4 mutant females of mixed (B6/129:Swiss Webster:CD1) genetic background, in which Cre is fused in frame with the Pou3f4 start codon [28], were crossed to congenic C57BL/6 Efnb2 LacZ/+ null heterozygote males [63] (Jax stock 006039) to obtain F1 hybrids, which were maintained through 11 generations of intercrosses. Sperm was cryopreserved from F1:N10 males carrying both null alleles. A second Efnb2 allele, with exon1 flanked by loxP sites [67] (Jax stock 006042), was maintained in the homozygous state on the C57BL/6 background as a separate colony. All Pou3f4 mutant specimens (and controls) analyzed were male progeny of F1 Pou3f4-Cre+;Efnb2 +/+ or Pou3f4-Cre+;Efnb2 LacZ/+ hybrids crossed to congenic C57BL/6 Efnb2 +/+ or Efnb2 flox/flox mice. Therefore all Pou3f4 mutants (and controls) analyzed were F2 generation mixed:C57BL/6 hybrids. In some experiments, Pou3f4-Cre+ mice were bred to C57BL/6 ROSA-YFP reporter mice (Jax stock 006148). PCR assay of the Smcx and Smcy genes [68] was used to determine the sex of embryos. A separate congenic C57BL/6 breeding colony was used to generate Sox9-IRES-Cre+;Efnb2 LacZ/+ double heterozygous mice, which were mated with Efnb2 flox/flox mice to obtain congenic C57BL/6 Efnb2 CKO and control embryos, as previously described [24]. Fixed specimens of mixed 129/CD1 strain Efnb2 C-terminal deletion homozygotes (ephrin-B2LacZ mice in [33]–[35]) and wild-type littermate controls were kindly provided by Dr. Mark Henkemeyer (UT Southwestern Medical Center). All PCR genotyping of targeted alleles was conducted as previously described. CD1 embryos were used for studies of normal gene expression, histology, and chromatin isolation. All animal experiments were carried out in strict accordance with recommendations set forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All protocols were approved by the Investigational Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders.
Tissue fixation and preparation
Pregnant dams were euthanized with an anesthetic concentration of CO2 and cervical dislocation. For Alcian Blue/Nuclear Fast Red histology at mid-gestational stages (E12–E14.5) whole embryos were immersed in methacarn fixative (6∶3∶1 methanol:chloroform:glacial Acetic Acid) for 1 to 5 hours, trimmed, rinsed in methanol, cleared sequentially in methyl benzoate and xylene (1×30–60 minutes each), infiltrated with paraffin, and cut serially in the transverse plane of the embryo at 7 micron thickness on a Leica RM2145 microtome. For Alcian Blue/Nuclear Fast Red histology at perinatal stages, heads were split mid-sagittally, immersion-fixed overnight at 4 degrees Celsius in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4), cryoprotected in 30% sucrose/PBS, embedded in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek), and cut serially in the sagittal plane at 7 micron thickness on a Leica CM 3050 S cryostat. For Weigert's Resorcin Fuchin staining of the stapedio-vestibular joint, adult temporal bones were dissected and immersion-fixed overnight at 4 degrees Celsius in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, decalcified in 0.1M EDTA in PBS, washed, cleared sequentially in graded alcohols and xylene, infiltrated with paraffin, and cut serially in the longitudinal plane of the ear at 7 micron thickness on a Leica RM2145 microtome. For anti-GFP immunofluorescence and RNA in situ hybridization, mid-gestation embryos were immersion-fixed overnight at 4 degrees Celsius in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose/PBS, embedded in OCT medium, and cut serially in the transverse plane at 7 micron thickness on a Leica CM 3050 S cryostat. For whole mount Alcian Blue/Alizarin Red S staining of mid-sagitally split perinatal or adult heads, skin and brain were removed and specimens placed in 95% Ethanol for 3–5 days at room temperature.
Tissue processing
For Alcian Blue/Nuclear Fast Red histology, hydrated sections were dipped in 3% acetic acid for 3 minutes, stained in 1% Alcian Blue 8GX (Sigma A3157) at pH 2.5, washed in running water for 10 minutes, counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red (Vector Laboratories H-3403) for 5 minutes, washed in tap water for 10 minutes, dehydrated, cleared, and mounted in Permount. Weigert's Resorcin Fuchsin (EMS 26370) staining was carried out according to manufacturer's instructions. Anti-GFP immunofluorescence on tissue sections was performed by standard methods using a FITC-conjugated goat anti GFP antibody (Gene-Tex 1∶200), followed by counterstaining with rhodamine-phalloidin (Molecular Probes) and DAPI. RNA hybridzation to tissue sections was performed in slide mailers using digoxygenin-labeled probes in weakly acidic hybridization buffer (pH 4.5), anti-digoxigenin-AP Fab fragments (Roche 11093274910) in TBST buffer, and the NBT/BCIP colorimetric substrate reaction in AP buffer at pH 9.5. Whole mount Alcian Blue/Alizarin Red S staining of cartilage and bone was performed according to the method of McLeod [69].
RNA probes. Cre-mediated recombination at the floxed Efnb2 allele was validated with a 140bp exon 1-specific fragment (NM_010111.5, nt 139-278) PCR cloned from C57BL/6 tail DNA and ligated into pCR4-TOPO vector for in vitro transcription. Wild-type Efnb2 was detected with a ∼1 kb probe transcribed from NM_010111.5, nt136-1188. Other cDNAs used were as follows: Pou3f4 (NM_008901, a 511 base-pair NcoI fragment), Sox9 (NM-011448, 500 base-pair fragment), Epha4 (NM_007936, nt2782-4242), Ephb2 (NM_010142), Ephb3 (NM_010143, nt535-1207), and Ephb4 (BC090839.1, nt988-1947).
Histological and Anatomical Analyses
For qualitative comparisons of hybridization signals across genotypes, mutant-control littermate pairs were serially sectioned on the same day; each slide for a littermate pair contained mutant and control sections and these were distributed in equal proportions across the minimum number of slides needed to uniformly sample entire domains of interest from every second 7-micron serial section. Mutant and control sections were randomized in their placement from slide to slide. Four separate hybridization experiments were conducted, each containing one or more littermate pair section sets probed for each of the following genes: Efnb2, Ephb2, Epha4 , Pou3f4 , and Sox9.
Digital images of all sections in the area of the stapes were uniformly captured for each littermate pair/probe set during a single imaging session, and extent and intensity of signal in the area of the mutant and control stapes was rated from raw TIFF images. Scoring of defects at the stapes-styloid process or stapes-facial canal in perinatal or adult ears was accomplished by partial dissection and observation under a stereo-dissecting microscope and digital capture of images on a Leica M205FA stereomicroscope with motorized focusing. Statistical analyses of categorical data (using Prism 5 software) were carried out using a two-sided Fisher's exact test for 2×2 contingencies or a Chi Square test for data sets with 2 or more degrees of freedom. In the text, ‘occurrence’ denotes outcomes where n = the number of temporal bones analyzed; ‘penetrance’ denotes outcomes where n = the number of animals analyzed.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-PCR
A sharpened stainless-steel wire was used to isolate blocks of nascent middle ear mesenchyme from stage E12.25 CD1 mouse embryos. We generated four independent biological samples, each of which contained pooled tissue from eight ears. Each independent sample was collected in ice-cold 1X PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature, washed, pelleted, and frozen. Chromatin was isolated from each pellet by methods outlined in the Pierce Agarose ChIP Kit (Thermo Scientific, Catalog #26156). Chromatin was treated with micrococcal nuclease for 15 minutes at 37°C to produce DNA fragments ranging in size from 200–600 base pairs. Chromatin from E10.5 limb mesenchyme (where Pou3f4 is not expressed) [31], [38] was identically prepared. Each independent chromatin preparation was divided equally by volume and incubated overnight at 4 degrees Celcius with either 10 µg whole IgY (Jackson Immunoresearch, Catalog #003-000-003) or 10 µg anti Pou3f4-specific IgY [28]. Following incubation, Preciphen beads (Aves Labs, Catalog #P-1010) were added to the antibody/chromatin mixture and allowed to bind for 2 hours. After extensive rinsing in low- and high-salt buffers, antibody/chromatin complexes were eluted from the beads, treated with proteinase K, and column purified.
Concentrations of Efnb2 target sequences in IP eluates were quantified by qPCR on an Applied Biosystems StepOne Realtime PCR system using SYBR-green and the following primer sets derived from mouse chromosome 8 sequence GRCm38.p2 C57BL/6J (NC_000074.6): a negative control site lacking the Pou3f4 binding motif (non-consensus or NC site) CTTGTTCCCAGTGTGGATGA (forward) and ACCCCAAACAACTGAACCAG (reverse); site 1, TTACGAATTGGACACTAACAAGC (forward) and TGGCCTGAAAAACAGGTTC (reverse); site 3, ACACTAACAAGCCTCTTCTCCA (forward) and TGCAGGAATATAAGTGGCCTGA (reverse); site 5, TTTGGCTTTTCCTGGACATT (forward) and GCCCAAGTTAATGCGTTTTC (reverse); site 6, GACCTTGAGGCTCCTTTGC (forward) and GCAGAAACCCCGAAATGTAA (reverse). The annealing temperature used for all reactions was 55°C, with the exception of the site 3 primer pair reactions, which used an annealing temperature of 60°C. All qPCR reactions comprised 40 cycles and resulted in a single product, as determined by melt curve and gel electrophoretic analyses. Amplicon specificity was validated by direct sequencing. For absolute quantifications of template input to qPCR reactions, a standard curve was generated for each primer pair using total genomic DNA (gDNA) from pooled forelimb and hindlimb tissues of E10.5 CD1 mouse embryos; gDNA was purified, fixed, nuclease-digested as described above, and serially diluted for use in triplicate qPCR reactions. Semi-log transformation and linear regression gave Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from −.963 to −.999. Primer efficiencies, defined by the equation 10∧[−1/slope], ranged from 1.9 to 2.7. Concentrations of target site DNA from IgY and anti-Pou3f4 pull-downs were computed from Ct values and standard curve equations. Each of four independent chromatin preparations (middle ear or limb) was assayed twice by qPCR in technical triplicate, yielding 8 matched pairs of data (anti-Pou3f4 IP vs. control IgY IP) for each target site tested. Paired data sets were subjected to the Wilcoxon signed rank test (Prism 5 software), with a cut-off for statistical significance at P<0.05.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Drs. Robert Morell and Michael Hoa for critical readings of the manuscript, Dr. Haruhiko Akiyama for providing the Sox9-IRES-Cre mouse, and Dr. Mark Henkemeyer for providing fixed tissue for histological analyses of Efnb2 C-terminal deletion mutants and control littermates.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
Work was funded by the Intramural Program of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Adams JC, Liberman MC (2010) Anatomy. In: Merchant SN Nadol Jr JB, editors. Schuknecht's Pathology of the Ear. 3rd ed. Shelton: People's Medical Publishing House-USA. pp. 54–95. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Depew MJ, Tucker AS, Sharpe PT (2002) Craniofacial Development. In: Rossant J, Tam PPL, editors. Mouse Development: Patterning, Morphogenesis, and Organogenesis. Academic Press. pp. 421–481. [Google Scholar]
- 3. McBratney-Owen B, Iseki S, Bamforth SD, Olsen BR, Morriss-Kay GM (2008) Development and tissue origins of the mammalian cranial base. Dev Biol 322: 121–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. O'Gorman S (2005) Second branchial arch lineages of the middle ear of wild-type and Hoxa2 mutant mice. Dev Dyn 234: 124–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Thompson H, Ohazama A, Sharpe PT, Tucker AS (2012) The origin of the stapes and relationship to the otic capsule and oval window. Dev Dyn 241: 1396–1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cremers CW, Hombergen GC, Scaf JJ, Huygen PL, Volkers WS, et al. (1985) X-linked progressive mixed deafness with perilyphatic gusher during stapes surgery. Arch Otolarygol 111(4): 249–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Phelps PD, Reardon W, Pembrey M, Bellman S, Luxom L (1991) X-linked deafness, stapes gushers and a distinctive defect of the inner ear. Neuroradiology 33: 326–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bach I, Brunner HG, Beighton P, Ruvalcaba RHA, Reardon W, et al. (1992) Microdeletions in patients with gushjer-associated X-linked mixed deafness (DFN3). Am J Hum Genet 51: 38–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Piussan C, Hanauer A, Dahl N, Mathieu M, Kolski C, et al. (1995) X-linked progressive mixed deafness: A new microdeletion that involves a more proximal region in Xq21. Am J Hum Genet 56: 224–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Huber I, Bitner-Glindzicz M, de Kok YJ, van der Maarel SM, Ishikawa-Brush Y, et al. (1994) X-linked mixed deafnes (DFN3): cloning and characterization of the critical region allows the identification of novel microdeletions. Hum Mol Genet 3(7): 1151–1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. de Kok YJ, van der Maarel SM, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Huber I, Monaco AP, et al. (1995) Association between X-linked mixed deafness and mutations in the POU domain gene POU3F4. Science 267: 685–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. de Kok YJ, Vossenaar ER, Cremers CW, Dahl N, Laporte J, et al. (1996) Identification of a hot spot for microdeletions in patients with X-linked deafness type 3 (DFN3) 900 kb proximal to the DFN gene POU3F4. Hum Mol Genet 5(9): 1229–1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ryan AK, Rosenfeld MG (1997) POU domain family values: flexibility, partnerships, and developmental codes. Genes Dev 11(10): 1207–1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Phippard D, Lu L, Lee D, Saunders JC, Crenshaw EB 3rd (1999) Targeted mutagenesis of the POU-domain gene Brn4/Pou3f4 causes developmental defects in the inner ear. J Neurosci 19(14): 5980–5989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Phippard D, Boyd Y, Reed V, Gisher G, Masson WK, et al. (2000) The sex-linked fidget mutation abolishes Brn4/Pou3f4 gene expression in the embryonic inner ear. Hum Mol Genet 9(1): 79–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Braunstein EM, Crenshaw EB 3rd, Morrow BE, Adams JC (2000) Cooperative function of Tbx1 and Brn4 in the periotic mesenchyme is necessary for cochlea formation. J Assoc Res Otolarygol 9(1): 33–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Minowa O, Ikeda K, Sugitani Y, Oshima T, Nakai S, et al. (1999) Altered cochlear fibrocytes in a mouse model of DFN3 non-syndromic deafness. Science 285: 1408–1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Song MH, Choi S-Y, Wu L, Oh S-K, Lee HK, et al. (2011) Pou3f4 deficiency causes defects in otic fibrocytes and stria vascularis by different mechanisms. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 404: 528–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cowan CA, Henkemeyer M (2002) Ephrins in reverse, park and drive. Trends Cell Biol 12: 339–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Xu NJ, Henkemeyer M (2012) Ephrin reverse signaling in axon guidance and synaptogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23: 58–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Klein R (2012) Eph/ephrin signaling during development. Development 139: 4105–4109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Batlle E, Wilkinson DG (2012) Molecular mechanisms of cell segregation and boundary formation in development and tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4: a008227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bush JO, Soriano P (2010) Ephrin-B1 forward signaling regulates craniofacial morphogenesis by controlling cell proliferation across Eph-ephrin boundaries. Genes Dev 24: 2068–2080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Raft S, Andrade LR, Shao D, Akiyama H, Henkemeyer M, et al. (2014) Ephrin-B2 governs morphogenesis of endolymphatic sac and duct epithelia in the mouse inner ear. Dev Biol 390(1): 51–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Holmberg J, Genander M, Halford MM, Anneren C, Sondell M, et al. (2006) EphB receptors coordinate migration and proliferation in the intestinal stem cell niche. Cell 125: 1151–1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Genander M, Halford MM, Xu N-J, Eriksson M, Yu Z (2009) Dissociation of EphB2 signaling pathways mediating progenitor cell proliferation and tumor suppression. Cell 139: 679–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Chumley MJ, Catchpole T, Silvany RE, Kernie SG, Henkemeyer M (2007) EphB receptors regulate stem/projenitor cell proliferation, migration, and polarity during hippocampal neurogenesis. J Neurosci 27(49): 13481–13490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Coate TM, Raft S, Zhao X, Ryan AK, Crenshaw EB 3rd, et al. (2012) Otic mesenchyme cells regulate spiral ganglion axon fasciculation through a Pou3f4/EphA4 signaling pathway. Neuron 73(1): 49–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ohashi M, Ide S, Kimitsuki T, Komune S, Suganuma T (2006) Three dimensional regular arrangement of the annular ligament of the rat stapediovestibular joint. Hear Res 213: 11–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sobol SE, Teng X, Crenshaw EB 3rd (2005) Abnormal mesenchymal differentiation in the suprerior semicircular canal of Brn4/Pou3f4 knockout mice. Arch Otolarygol Head Neck Surg 131: 41–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Phippard D, Heydemann A, Lechner M, Lu L, Lee D, et al. (1998) Changes in subcellular localization of the Brn4 gene product precede mesenchymal remodeling of the otic capsule. Hear Res 120: 77–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. McPhee JR, Van De Water TR (1985) A comparison of morphological stages and sulfated glycosaminoglycan production during otic capsule formation: in vivo and in vitro. Anat Rec 213(4): 566–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Cowan CA, Yokoyama N, Saxena A, Chumley MJ, Silvany RE, et al. (2004) Ephrin-B2 reverse signaling is required for axon pathfinding and cardiac valve formation but not early vascular development. Dev Biol 271: 263–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dravis C, Yokoyama N, Chumley MJ, Cowan CA, Silvany RE, et al. (2004) Bidirectional signaling mediated by ephrin-B2 and EphB2 controls urorectal development. Dev Biol 271: 272–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Dravis C, Wu T, Chumley MJ, Yokoyama N, Wei S, et al. (2007) EphB2 and ephrin-B2 regulate the ionic homeostasis of vestibular endolymph. Hear Res 223: 93–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Akiyama H, Kim J-E, Nakashima K, Balmes G, Iwai N, et al. (2005) Osteo-chondroprogenitor cells are derived from Sox9 expressing precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 14665–14670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Okazawa H., Imafuku I., Minowa M.T., Kanazawa I., Hamada H., et al. (1996) Regulation of striatal D1A dopamine receptor gene transcription by Brn-4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11933–11938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Heydemann A, Nguyen LC, Crenshaw EB 3rd (2001) Regulatory regions from the Brn4 promoter direct LACZ expression to the developing forebrain and neural tube. Brain research Developmental brain research 128: 83–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Adams RH, Diella F, Hennig S, Helmbacher F, Deutsch U, et al. (2001) The cytoplasmic domain of the ligand ephrinB2 is required for vascular morphogenesis but not neural crest migration. Cell 104, 57–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Sohl M, Lanner F, Farnebo F (2009) Characterization of the murine Ephrin-B2 promoter. Gene 437(1–2): 54–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sanchez-Guardado LO, Ferran JL, Rodriguez-Gallardo L, Puelles L, Hidalgo-Sanchez M (2011) Meis gene expression patterns in the developing chicken inner ear. J Comp Neurol 519: 125–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Diez-Roux G, Banfi S, Sultan M, Geffers L, Anand S, et al. (2011) A high-resolution anatomical atlas of the transcriptome in the mouse embryo. Plos Biol 9(1): e10000582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hanson JR, Anson BJ, Strickland EM (1962) Branchial sources of the auditory ossicles in man. Part II: Observations of embryonic stages from 7mm to 28 mm (CR length). Arch Otolaryng 76: 200–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Cauldwell EW, Anson BJ (1942) Stapes, fissula ante fenestram, and associated structures in man. Arch Otolaryngol 36: 891–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Rodriguez-Vasquez JF (2005) Development of the stapes and associated structures in human embryos. J Anat 207: 165–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Amin S, Matalova E, Simpson C, Yoshida H, Tucker AS (2007) Incudomalleal joint formation: the roles of apoptosis, migration, and downregulation. BMC Dev Biol 7: 134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Amin S, Tucker AS (2006) Joint formation in the middle ear: lessons from the mouse and guinea pig. Dev Dyn 235: 1326–1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Nance WE, Steleff R, McLeod A, Sweeney A, Cooper C, et al. (1971) X-linked mixed deafness with congenital fixation of the stapedial footplate and perilymphatic gusher. Birth Defects Orig Art Ser VII(4): 64–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Glasscock ME (1973) The stapes gusher. Arch Otolaryngol 98: 82–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Cremers CW, Hombergen GC, Wentges RT (1983) Perilymphatic gusher and stapes surgery. A predictable complication? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 8(4): 235–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Cremers CW (1985) Audiologic features of the X-linked progressive mixed deafness syndrome with perilymphatic gusher during stapes surgery. Am J Otol 6(3): 243–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Snick A, Hombergen G, Mylanus E, Cremers CW (1995) Air-bone gap in patients with X-linked stapes gusher syndrome. Am J Otol 16(2): 241–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Choi BY, An Y-H, Park JH, Jang JH, Chung HC, et al. (2013) Audiological and surgical evidence for the presence of a third window effect for the conductive hearing loss in DFNX2 deafness irrespective of type of mutations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270: 3057–3062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ (2008) Conductive hearing loss caused by third-window lesions of the inner ear. Otol Neurotol 29: 282–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Samadi DS, Saunders JC, Crenshaw EB 3rd (2005) Mutation of the POU-domain gene Brn4/Pou3f4 affects middle ear sound conduction in the mouse. Hear Res 199: 11–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Nandapalan V, Tos M (2000) Isolated congenital stapes ankylosis: an embryologic survey and literature review. Am J Otol 21: 71–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ahn KJ, Passero F, Crenshaw EB 3rd (2009) Otic mesenchyme expression of cre recombinase directed by the inner ear enhancer of the Brn4/Pou3f4 gene. Genesis 47: 137–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Naranjo S, Voesenek K, de la Calle-Mustienes E, Robert-Moreno A, Kokotas H (2010) Multiple enhancers located in a 1-Mb region upstream of POU3F4 promote expression during inner ear development and may be required for hearing. Hum Genet 128: 411–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Robert-Moreno A, Naranjo S, de la Calle-Mustienes E, Gomez-Karmeta JL, Alsina B (2010) Characterization of new otic enhancers of the Pou3f4 gene reveal distinct signaling pathway regulation and spatio-temporal patterns. PLoS One 5(12): e15907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Hwang C-H, Wu DK (2008) Noggin heterozygous mice: an animal model for congenital conductive hearing loss in humans. Hum Mol Genet 17(6): 844–853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Ruest L-B, Clouthier DE (2009) Elucidating timing and function of endothelin-A receptor signaling during craniofacial development using neural crest cell-specific gene deletion and receptor anatagonsim. Dev Biol 328: 94–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Medeiros DM, Crump JG (2008) New perspectives on pharyngeal dorsoventral patterning in development and evolution of the vertebrate jaw. Dev Biol 371: 121–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Jeong J, Li X, McEvilly RJ, Rosenfeld MG, Lufkin T, et al. (2008) Dlx genes pattern mammalian jaw primordium by regulating both lower jaw-specific and upper jaw-specific genetic programs. Development 135: 2905–2916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Wang HU, Chen ZF, Anderson DJ (1998) Molecular distinction and angiogenic interaction between embryonic arteries and veins revealed by ephrin-B2 and its receptor Eph-B4. Cell 93: 741–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Miko IJ, Henkemeyer M, Cramer KS (2008) Auditory brainstem responses are impaired in EphA4 and ephrin-B2 deficient mice. Hear Res 235: 39–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Zhou CQ, Lee J, Henkemeyer MJ, Lee KH (2011) Disruption of EphrinB/Eph B interaction results in abnormal cochlear innervation patterns. Laryngoscope 121: 1541–1547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Gerety SS, Anderson DJ (2002) Cardiovascular ephrinB2 function is essential for embryonic angiogenesis. Development 129: 1397–1410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Mroz K, Carrel L, Hunt PA (1999) Germ cell development in the XXY mouse: Evidence that X chromosome reactivation is independent of sexual differentiation. Dev Biol 207(1): 229–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. McLeod MJ (1980) Differential staining of cartilage and bone in whole mouse fetuses by Alcian Blue and Alizarin Red S. Teratology 22: 299–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.