Abstract
Gap junction (GJ) channels have been recognized as an important mechanism for synchronizing neuronal networks. Herein, we investigated the participation of GJ channels in the pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus (SE) by analyzing electrophysiological activity following the blockade of connexins (Cx)-mediated communication. In addition, we examined the regulation of gene expression, protein levels, phosphorylation profile and distribution of neuronal Cx36, Cx45 and glial Cx43 in the rat hippocampus during the acute and latent periods. Electrophysiological recordings revealed that the GJ blockade anticipates the occurrence of low voltage oscillations and promotes a marked reduction of power in all analyzed frequencies.Cx36 gene expression and protein levels remained stable in acute and latent periods, whereas upregulation of Cx45 gene expression and protein redistribution were detected in the latent period. We also observed upregulation of Cx43 mRNA levels followed by changes in the phosphorylation profile and protein accumulation. Taken together, our results indisputably revealed that GJ communication participates in the epileptiform activity induced by pilocarpine. Moreover, considering that specific Cxs undergo alterations through acute and latent periods, this study indicates that the control of GJ communication may represent a focus in reliable anti-epileptogenic strategies.
Introduction
Gap junction (GJ) channels couple adjacent cells, allowing transfer of second messengers, ions, and molecules up to 1 kDa. These channels are composed by a multigene family of integral membrane proteins called connexins (Cx). So far, at least 20 Cx genes were identified in the mouse and human genome [1]. Notably, communication through GJ channels has been recognized as an important mechanism for synchronizing neuronal networks in both physiological and pathological conditions [2]–[4]. In fact, several evidences from animal models [5]–[11] and human slices from epileptic patients [12], [13] indicate the participation of GJ channels in the generation and maintenance of epileptic seizures. Moreover, specific alterations of Cx expression have been described in tissue from epileptic patients [14]–[16] and in experimental models [11], [17]–[20].
The aim of this study was to determine the involvement of GJ channels in the epileptiform activity induced by pilocarpine by examining the changes in electrophysiological patterns produced by uncoupling of these channels with carbenoxolone (CBX). After we established the participation of GJ in the ictal discharges, we thoroughly analyzed the regulation of gene expression, changes in protein levels, phosphorylation profile and distribution of the neuronal Cx36 and Cx45 and the glial Cx43, three of the most highly expressed Cxs in the rat hippocampus, [1], [18], [21]–[24] during acute seizures and the epileptogenic process. We observed that pharmacological blockade of GJ channels decreases the epileptiform activity, which in turn regulates Cx gene expression, protein levels and phosphorylation. Thus, our results revealed a reciprocal, mutual regulation of Cx-mediated communication and the epileptiform phenomenon.
Methods
Ethics Statement
All experiments were carried out with healthy male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) weighing between 270 and 300 g and mean age ranging from 80–90 days. Experiments with animals were conducted in accordance with guidelines of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Brazilian Scientific Society for Laboratory Animals. Experimental protocol (#19, page 67, book 02/2009) was approved by the Ethics Committee in Animal Experimentation of the Institute of Biomedical Sciences/University of São Paulo (ICB/USP). All animals were housed in groups of five in plastic cages under controlled conditions of temperature (22°C±2), relative humidity (45% to 50%) and light/dark cycles (12 hours of light/12 hours of darkness) in a vivarium approved by ICB/USP Ethics Committee in Animal Experimentation. Rats were given ad libitum access to a standard rodent maintenance diet (Nuvilab, Curitiba, PR, Brazil) and tap water. Surgeries were performed under diazepam sedation followed by ketamine anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Implantation of recording electrodes
Animals underwent sedation with diazepam (6 mg/kg, i.p., União Química, Embu-Guaçu, SP, BRA), anesthesia with ketamine (100 mg/kg, i.p., Parke-Davis, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and stereotaxic surgery for bilateral electrode implantation. All surgeries were performed in the laboratory in the morning. Bipolar 150-µm-diameter nichrome bipolar electrodes were implanted over neocortical area (AP: −1.5 mm, ML: ±3.0 mm) according to skull references [25].
ECoG recordings and drug administration
Ten days after the surgical procedure, the rats were placed in a Faraday cage and connected to the input panel of a 21-channel Nihon–Koden electroencephalograph (Neurofax EEG 4400) for habituation 1 day before the experiment. In the day of the experiment, which was always performed in the laboratory between 08 AM and 17 PM, after thirty minutes recording of the basal activity, the first group of animals (SE+CBX; n = 6 animals) was submitted to the injection of methyl-scopolamine (1 mg/kg, s.c.; Sigma-Aldrich, USA), used to reduce the peripheral cholinergic effects, followed by pilocarpine hydrochloride (360 mg/kg, i.p.; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) injection thirty minutes later. Thirty minutes after the establishment of status epilepticus (SE), the animals were treated with CBX (60 mg/kg, i.p., dissolved in saline; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and the ECoGs were continuously recorded for two hours at different time points (0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min).The second group (SE group; n = 5 animals) was treated in a similar way as the first one, except for the approximate volume of sterile saline (i.p.) injected instead of CBX, and the ECoGs were also continuously registered for two hours. The third group (Control CBX; n = 5 animals) received saline instead of pilocarpine, followed by CBX injection. The behavior of the rats was continuously monitored during the ECoG recordings. Recordings were acquired at 512 Hz, notch filter of 60 Hz, low pass of 35 Hz. A Matlab (Mathworks) script run off line ECoG analysis to detect flat periods longer than 250 ms between the on-SE and off-SE raw recordings for each rat, and minimum time interval for each animal to present flat periods were averaged for both groups. ECoG data were sampled in 5 epochs of 10 seconds to represent each period (basal, methyl-scopolamine, SE, t0, t30, t60, t90, t120) with ECoG power spectrum and spectrogram. Power spectrum analysis was performed using Welch's Method, window 128 and overlap 64. Spectrogram used Kaiser window 1024 and overlap 516. The software to run statistical comparisons as analysis of variance and T-test was SPSS. All statistical comparisons considered significance level set at 5%.
SE induction for molecular analysis
Animals were previously treated with methyl-scopolamine nitrate (1 mg/kg, s.c.; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to reduce peripheral cholinergic effects. Thirty minutes later animals of the experimental group received a single dose of pilocarpine hydrochloride (360 mg/kg, i.p.; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to induce SE, and control animals received a similar volume of sterile saline. SE induction was always performed in the laboratory between 08 AM and 10 PM.
Euthanasia of animals of the acute group was performed by decapitation 2 hours after the onset of SE. Animals of the latent group received a single dose of diazepam (10 mg/kg, s.c., União Química, Embu-Guaçu, SP) 2 hours after SE initiation to interrupt seizures, and euthanasia was conducted 3 days after SE induction.
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and Real-Time PCR
Hippocampi from control (n = 8), acute (n = 8) and latent (n = 8) animals were directly homogenized in 1–1.5 ml TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and total RNA was extracted following the manufacturer suggested protocol and previously described [26]. Briefly, following two chloroform extraction steps, RNA was precipitated with isopropanol and the pellet washed twice in 70% ethanol. After air-drying, RNA was resuspended in DEPC-treated water and the concentration of each sample obtained from A260 measurements. Residual DNA was removed using DNase I (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA) following manufacturer protocol. Quantitative analysis of gene expression was carried out with a Rotor-Gene 6000 Real-Time Rotary Analyzer (Corbett Robotics Inc., San Francisco, CA) with specific primers for rat Cx36 (forward, 5′- GGGGAATGGACCATCTTGGA-3′; reverse, 5′- TCCCCTACAATGGCCACAAT-3′), Cx45 (forward, 5′- GGGTAACGGAGGTTCTGGTTACAGGGTTGTCTACGCCGCC-3′; reverse, 5′- AAGCTCCAACTCATGGTGGT-3′) and Cx43 (forward, 5′-ACTTCAGCCTCCAAGGAGTT-3′; reverse 5′-TGGAGTAGGCTTGGACCTTG-3′). cDNA abundance for cyclophilin A (forward, 5′- GCGTTTTGGGTCCAGGAATGGC-3′; reverse, 5′- TTGCGAGCAGATGGGGTGGG-3′) was determined as internal control. For each 20 µl reverse transcription reaction, 4 µg total RNA was mixed with 1 µl oligodT primer (0.5 µg; Invitrogen) and incubated for 10 min at 65°C. After cooling on ice the solution was mixed with 4 µl 5× first strand buffer, 2 µl of 0.1 M DTT, 1 µl of dATP, dTTP, dCTP and dGTP (each 10 mM), and 1 µl SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (200 U; Invitrogen) and incubated for 60 min at 50°C. Reaction was inactivated by heating at 70°C for 15 min. All PCR assays were performed as follows: after initial activation at 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min, cycling conditions were 95°C, 10 s and 60°C, 1 min. Dissociation curves of PCR products were obtained by heating samples from 60 to 95°C, in order to evaluate primer specificity. Relative quantification of target gene expression was evaluated using the comparative CT method as previously described in detail [27], [28]. Values were entered into one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test, with the significance level set at 5%.
Western Blotting
Hippocampi from control (n = 7), acute (n = 7) and latent (n = 7) animals were rapidly dissected, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and homogenized in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors). Homogenates were centrifuged for 20 min at 14,000 G, 4°C to remove insoluble material. Protein concentration was determined by the BCA method (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and bovine serum albumin was used as the standard, following manufacturer protocol. Proteins in the membrane preparations were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; 10% gel) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Blots were incubated with 5% non-fat milk in TBST buffer for 2 h at room temperature to block nonspecific binding of the antibodies. After rinsed in TBST, blots were incubated overnight with primary antibodies raised against Cx36 (rabbit polyclonal 36-4600, Zymed/Invitrogen, 1∶1000), Cx45 (rabbit polyclonal AB1745, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA, 1∶1000), Cx43 (rabbit polyclonal 71-0700, mouse monoclonal 13-8300, Zymed/Invitrogen, 1∶1000) and beta-actin (mouse monoclonal A5316, Sigma-Aldrich, 1∶10000) diluted in TBST/3% non-fat milk. After the primary antibody incubation, blots were rinsed in TBST and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody raised against rabbit or mouse conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) enzyme (1∶5000, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. Detection of labeled proteins was achieved by using the enhanced chemiluminescent system (ECLTM kit; Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Measurements of optical densities (OD) were performed using Alliance 2.7 system (UVItec Limited, Cambridge, United Kingdom). ODs of the bands were normalized using the value found for the beta-actin. Data from the experiments were entered into T-Test analysis with the significance level set at 5%.
Immunohistochemistry
Brains were collected and fixed for 8 hours in 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate buffer 0.1 M pH 7.3 (PB), and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose solution for at least 48 hours at 4°C. Brain coronal sections (12 µm) were obtained on a cryostat. Brain sections containing the hippocampus were incubated overnight with primary antibodies raised against Cx36 (36-4600, Zymed/Invitrogen, 1∶100), Cx45 (AB1745, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA, 1∶200), Cx43 (710700, Zymed/Invitrogen, 1∶100) and parvalbumin (P3088, Sigma-Aldrich, 1∶200) in a solution containing 5% normal goat serum and 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS at room temperature. After several washes, brain sections were incubated with goat antiserum against rabbit or mouse IgG tagged to Alexa 488 (1∶200–1∶500, Invitrogen) and 3% normal goat serum diluted in 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 2 hours at room temperature. For double-labeling experiments, secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa 546 or Alexa 647 (1∶200–1∶500, Invitrogen) were used. Controls for the experiments consisted of the omission of primary antibodies; no staining was observed in these cases. Counterstaining of brain sections was achieved using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), diluted in the same 0.3% Triton X-100 of the secondary antibodies. After washing, the tissue was mounted using Vecta Shield (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA), and analyzed in Nikon TS100F inverted microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA). Figures were mounted with Adobe Photoshop CS5 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Manipulation of the images was restricted to brightness and contrast adjustments of the whole image.
Image Quantification
Image analyses were performed with ImageJ software (National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) and NIS elements (Nikon Instruments Inc.), as previously described [29], employing approximately 30 hippocampal slices from 4 animals (6–8 hippocampal slices from each animal). For Cx36 analyses, after channel separation (RGB) of color images, we performed quantification of the mean pixel intensity, where values correspond to the brightness of the pixels, of Cx36 labeling in the green channel within an area of interest (AOI) defined by the labeling of parvalbumin in the red channel. For analyses of Cx45 and Cx43 images (green channel), we performed quantification of the mean pixel intensity of each AOI (strata oriens, pyramidale, lucidum, radiatum and lacunosum-moleculare). Values were normalized by the mean pixel intensity of the whole image. Mander's colocalization coefficient between Cx36 and parvalbumin was performed. Values from all analyses were entered into one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by pairwise comparisons in Tukey's HSD test, with the significance level set at 5%. Images and charts were prepared using Adobe Photoshop CS5.
Results
GJ communication is involved in the epileptiform activity
As a first approach, we first verified the contribution of GJ communication in epileptiform electrical activity. For this purpose, we induced SE by injecting pilocarpine in two groups of rats, named SE group and SE+CBX group. After pilocarpine administration, animals experienced a progressive evolution of seizures, and approximately 45 minutes later, 80% of the animals had developed SE, characterized by tonic-clonic generalized seizures [30], [31]. Animals treated with CBX without pilocarpine (Control CBX group) did not present behavioral alterations.
Figure 1 (A–H) shows the representative ECoGs of SE+CBX group. During the basal and methyl-scopolamine periods, ECoGs display electrical activity of low frequency and amplitude. After pilocarpine administration, ECoGs exhibited increasing epileptiform potentials characterized by isolated spikes (I, arrows) which evolved to continuous poly-spikes and spike-wave complexes (Ja and Jb, respectively), characterizing the establishment of SE (C). Thirty minutes after the establishment of SE, CBX was injected in the animals of SE+CBX group (D). We observed that CBX treatment induced changes in the epileptiform activity, as illustrated during all analyzed periods (E–H). A prominent aspect of the epileptiform potentials also associated with the signal is the occurrence of low voltage oscillations, which resemble flat periods (K, arrows). While we did not detect differences in the total number or duration of these flat periods, the time frame for the manifestation of these events was significantly reduced in the SE+CBX group compared to the SE group, which received saline instead of CBX (476±116 seconds vs. 2565±881 seconds, respectively; P<0.01) (L), demonstrating the effects of the GJ blocker on pilocarpine-induced SE. The Control CBX group, which received saline followed by the CBX injection, did not present any of the above described alterations related to CBX treatment (data not shown).
In addition to the alterations in the epileptiform potentials, we also observed changes in frequency composition. Figure 2 (A–C) shows the frequency composition of ECoGs following 2 hours after CBX or saline injection. (A) The spectrogram of Control CBX group shows greater contribution of low frequencies. On the other hand, the spectrogram of SE group (B) shows high intensity in full range frequencies after saline administration, whereas the spectrogram of SE+CBX group exhibits reduction of intensity of all frequencies that compose the signal (C). In addition, Fig. 2 also shows the representative power spectra of SE+CBX group during all analyzed periods (D–K). We observed that compared with basal and methyl-scopolamine periods (D, E), pilocarpine-induced SE promoted marked changes in the power spectrum (F). Although the potentials observed during the SE period oscillated in the same frequency ranges of the basal and methyl-scopolamine periods (frequencies <5 Hz, 5–11 Hz, 12–35 Hz, known as delta, theta and beta oscillations, respectively), there was a global increase of the power of all frequency ranges. After CBX administration, which occurred 30 minutes after the establishment of SE (G), we visualized changes in the profile of frequency contribution, especially the reduction of the power of frequencies between 15–30 Hz (H–K). Indeed, the time period for the decrease of the power of this frequency band was significantly minor in the SE+CBX group comparing with SE group, which received saline instead of CBX (3925±326 seconds vs. 5599±473 seconds, respectively; P<0.01) (L). While CBX administration promoted changes on the above electrophysiological parameters of SE, no behavioral alterations were detected on seizure manifestations.
Epileptiform activity changes Cxs gene expression during the latent period
By using primers specifically designed for Cx36, Cx45 and Cx43 we generated amplification plots from cDNA serial dilutions. Dissociation curves of these PCR products were obtained by heating samples from 60 to 95°C. The single peak observed matched to theoretical melting temperature calculated previously, indicating specificity of the primers. Amplification plots indicated that pilocarpine-induced SE did not alter gene expression of any of the analyzed Cxs, as shown in Fig. 3. However, both Cx45 and Cx43 transcript levels have higher expression (2∧2.88 = 7.36 fold-expression and 2∧2.49 = 5.62 fold expression, respectively; P<0.001) in the hippocampus of animals evaluated during the latent period when compared to controls. Cyclophilin A gene expression was used as an internal control (Fig. 3).
Epileptiform activity induces changes in the total and phosphorylated forms of Cx43
In order to verify the protein levels of Cxs in the hippocampi of rats during the acute and latent periods, we performed Western blot analysis. We were not able to detect changes in protein levels of the analyzed Cxs in the acute period (Fig. 4, A–D). During the latent period, Cx36 and Cx45 protein levels did not differ compared with control group (Fig. 4, E–G, respectively). However, both Cx43 total protein levels (phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms, antibody 71-0700) and one of the unphosphorylated forms (antibody 13-8300) of the protein showed higher levels (193%, P<0.01 and 168%, P<0.001, respectively) when compared to controls (Fig. 4H).
Cx36 expression in interneurons is not modulated in CA3 by epileptiform activity
Once we determined that GJ communication is involved in the epileptiform activity induced by pilocarpine and that Cxs undergo alterations in gene expression and posttranslational modifications, we focused on Cx distribution in CA3. For this purpose, we conducted double-labeling experiments using parvalbumin (PV), a calcium binding protein which is known to label a subset of GABAergic interneurons that are electrically coupled by Cx36 [32]–[34]. Indeed, we confirmed the co-expression of Cx36 and PV in the CA3 (Fig. 5, A–D). To determine whether Cx36 amount in PV-positive cells changes in the acute and latent periods, we performed analysis combining pixel intensity profiles and quantification of the mean pixel intensity after RGB decomposition data. We were not able to detect significant differences in pixel quantification analysis (Fig. 5, E–H). Moreover, we did not detect changes in Mander's coefficient from Cx36 and PV signals. Taking together, these results revealed a stable spatial pattern of Cx36 throughout acute and latent periods (Fig. 5, I–L).
Epileptiform activity induces changes in Cx45 spatial pattern within CA3
As we observed widespread Cx45 immunoreactivity in CA3 region, we conducted quantification of the mean pixel intensity in each strata (Fig. 6A) to examine whether Cx45 distribution is altered in the acute and latent periods. We were not able to detect changes in Cx45 distribution during the acute period (Fig. 6B, 6C and data not shown). During the latent period, our quantitative analyses revealed more pronounced labeling in the stratum oriens (119%, P<0.05), as well as decreased staining in stratum lacunosum-moleculare (65%, P<0.01) when compared to controls (Fig.6, B–I).
Epileptiform activity induces changes in Cx43 spatial pattern within CA3
To further examine the regulation of specific Cxs within the CA3 region, we evaluated the distribution of Cx43 in CA3 subfields, similarly to the analysis performed for Cx45. The quantification of the mean pixel intensity in each strata (Fig. 7A) revealed that during the acute period, Cx43 immunolabeling was increased in stratum pyramidale (171%, P<0.05), whereas reduction of 48% (P<0.05) was observed in stratum radiatum (Fig. 7, B–E). In the latent period, we were not able to detect significant changes in Cx43 distribution (Fig. 7, B–D, 7F and data not shown).
Discussion
The main purposes of this work were to demonstrate the involvement of GJ communication in the epileptiform activity and the possible alterations in Cx gene expression, protein levels, phosphorylation profile and distribution in the hippocampus triggered by pilocarpine. Indeed, our results showed that blockade of Cx channels produced antiepileptiform effects, indisputably correlating the GJ coupling with the epileptiform activity induced by pilocarpine. In spite of previous evidences in the literature regarding the anticonvulsant effects of GJ blockers, based on both in vitro [5]–[9], [35] and in vivo models [10], [11], this is the first report addressing this issue in the pilocarpine model, which reproduces most of the characteristics of human temporal lobe epilepsy [30], [31], [36], such as histopathological features associated with neuronal network reorganization, the occurrence of an initial precipitant injury (the acute phase), a seizure-free interval (latent period), and the occurrence of spontaneous recurrent seizures (chronic phase).
The mechanisms governing oscillations at the cellular and network levels underlie processes related to cognitive and pathological brain states [37], [38]. In this study, we were able to detect a marked increase in the power of beta frequency band following pilocarpine administration. Accordingly, a pronounced contribution of 20–80 Hz frequency band was reported in the kainic acid and in the lithium-pilocarpine models of temporal lobe epilepsy [39], [40]. Furthermore, we also showed that GJ communication participates in this oscillatory activity, since blockade of GJ channels promoted a significant decrease in the power of several frequencies, especially in the beta range.
Another evidence supporting the involvement of GJs in the epileptiform activity presented herein was the anticipation of the low voltage periods after CBX treatment. These events resemble the flat periods previously described [41]. According to that study, flat periods occur in the last two of the five electrographic stages described, namely continuous ictal discharges with flat periods and periodic epileptiform discharges on a flat background, which could be related to the increased inhibitory activity due to the prolonged SE.
Several studies deliberate about the optimal electrographic pattern after management of refractory SE with standard clinical treatments. A number of works point the EEG burst suppression pattern as the model for electrographic pattern (suppression consists of a flat EEG pattern – [42]–[46]), although others support a flat record pattern, which comprises total suppression of EEG signal background [47]. In spite of these controversies, our results regarding anticipation of flat-like periods after GJ blockade exhibit a certain similarity with the EEG recording expected after SE standard treatment, suggesting that Cx channels could serve as a potential target in refractory SE management.
Moreover, the earlier onset of flat periods after CBX treatment observed in our study could be explained by a hyperpolarization over a large number of cortical neurons [48]. It is known that GABAergic interneurons are important players in the regulation of cortical principal cells discharge. Additionally, synchronized activity of GABAergic interneurons is a mandatory feature that leads to synchronization of action potential of principal cells [49]–[51]. GJ composed of Cx36 are important structures that participate in the regulation of GABAergic interneuron synchronization [32]–[34]. In fact, disruption of GJ communication by deletion of Cx36 promotes a higher inhibitory response in neurons during high frequency discharges [52], [53]. Therefore, our results obtained with CBX treatment might be due to the desynchronization of GABAergic interneurons following uncoupling, demonstrating an important role of GJ communication in epileptiform potentials.
Although it has been demonstrated that CBX has effects other than on GJ channels, such as on intrinsic neuronal properties [54], antagonism of GABAA receptors [20], blocking of calcium channels [55] and on endogenous glucocorticoid metabolism [56], there are also evidences that CBX does not affect neuronal excitability and GABA responses [6], [57], [58], and that the depressed spontaneous epileptiform activity observed in hippocampal slices was not due to the mineralocorticoid agonist action of CBX [59]. In spite of these controversies, CBX has been widely used in GJ studies, where neuroprotective effects were examined [60], often in parallel to the demonstration of its uncoupling properties [35], [61], [62]. Indeed, the effects of CBX and its analogous on neuronal coupling and synchronization convincingly recapitulated Cx KO models [62], [63]. Taken together, these independent evidences from distinct groups allows for the use of CBX in GJ studies [64], [65].
In addition to the participation of GJ communication in the epileptiform activity, we also determined several changes in Cx expression during the acute and latent periods. Although there are studies pointing to the participation of Cx36 in epileptiform discharges [19], [66]–[68], we were not able to detect changes in Cx36 mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, the spatial pattern distribution of Cx36 throughout acute and latent periods remains constant, evidencing the stability of this protein in conditions of epileptiform discharges and subsequent epileptogenesis. However, considering that pilocarpine model induces neuronal loss [69]–[73], Cx36 stability might reflect an important role of GJ communication in the networks of GABAergic interneurons and principal cells that express this protein. Moreover, it is possible that even small differences in Cx expression play a significant role in the network coupled by electrical synapses [17], which in turn could participate in the seizure activity and the following process of epileptogenesis.
In agreement with previous studies, we detected the presence of Cx45 in hippocampal neurons [18], [23], [74]. Moreover, we detected changes in Cx45 distribution in the SO in the latent phase, which is consistent with the enhanced Cx45 transcript levels. Indeed, electronic coupling via GJ was reported between SO interneurons presumably in dendrites [75]. Additionally, the typical low pass filter feature imposed by GJ coupling over of the signal conductance could support synchronization of slow oscillations in the distal dendrites between SO interneurons. Also, it was reported the possible involvement of GABAergic interneurons presumably coupled by GJ in the slow oscillations recorded in hippocampal pyramidal cells [76]. Thus, our data regarding increase of Cx45 in SO could indicate the enhancement of coupling between the interneurons, which might intensify the occurrence of slow oscillations that, in turn, are noticed in a variety of epileptic activities [77], [78].
Furthermore, the expression of Cx45 in the SO hippocampal region, as pointed out in our work, could represent a substrate for the GJ coupling between axons of principle cells previously reported in the hippocampus [57], [79]. During the latent period, we observed an increased amount of Cx45 in this region. Interestingly, collateral connections from CA3 to CA1 are located within SO, and this is probably the site of occurrence of GJ connections [57]. Taking together, if the axo-axonal coupling that possibly takes place at SO involves Cx45, the upregulation of this protein could account for the generation of high frequency oscillations and the increased excitability observed in epileptic conditions [79].
Contrasting the increased levels in the SO, we noticed a decrease of Cx45 in the SLM during the latent period. It is well established that interneuron-mediated GABAergic synchronous potentials might play an important role in epilepsy [80], [81], and that the mechanisms underlying these responses could be mediated by electrical coupling [82], [83]. Indeed, propagation of GABAergic synchronized potentials recorded from SLM seems to be under control of electrical coupling [83], [84]. Interestingly, the synchronous synaptic release of GABA from interneurons of SLM promoted CA3 pyramidal cell activation [84]. Thus, the reduction of Cx45 could lead to desynchronization of GABA release from the interneurons, consequently decreasing CA3 pyramidal cell activity. Therefore, downregulation of Cx45 in the SLM during the latent period could indicate a plastic homeostatic change of the coupled network in order to restore its activity after the epileptogenic insult, since interneuron networks within SLM could regulate the input from the entorhinal cortex to the hippocampus [85].
Whether modulation of Cx45 expression in SO and SLM remains at later time points (e.g. from the time that animals present spontaneous recurrent seizures) is not known, but it would be worth evaluating the issue.
Interestingly, whereas changes in Cx45 distribution were seen in the latent period, alterations in Cx43 distribution through CA3 layers were observed in the acute period. Astroglial networks provide the supply of glucose and lactate necessary for the maintenance of hippocampal synaptic activity in an activity-dependent manner, and it has been shown that this metabolic network of astrocytes is mediated by GJ composed by Cx43 and Cx30 [86]. Thus, the increase in Cx43 distribution pattern observed in the SP is probably due to the high energetic demand promoted by the sustained epileptic activity. Additionally, the coupled astrocytes could provide an important intercellular pathway for both delivery of metabolites to distant locations during episodes of epileptic discharges and buffering of ions such as potassium [87], [88]. Increase of Cx43 in SP could account for two opposite situations: (1) besides providing distribution of metabolites of neurotransmitters and potassium (for review see ref. [89], [90]) to distant locations during episodes of epileptic discharges, a Cx43 increase could lead to the formation of GJ hemichannels, a pathway for adenosine release [91], which could also contribute to the local neuroprotective effects; (2) by allowing the propagation of toxic metabolites and death signals to adjacent cells, the increase in astroglial network coupling could amplify the damage to more distant sites, in addition to the possible contribution to the rapid propagation of the electrical signal [15].
Contrary to the observed in SP, we found decreased labeling of Cx43 in the CA3 SR. It has been demonstrated that the contribution of GJ in potassium buffering in the hippocampus is layer-dependent [92]. By comparing the properties of astrocytes from mice with Cx30/Cx43 deficiencies, those authors found that single astrocytes from SR reach larger areas than those from SLM, indicating the unequal size and orientation of astrocytes from those areas. Additionally, they found no impairment of potassium buffering in SR of transgenic mice, in contrast to the observed in the SLM, evidencing the participation of other elements in the potassium redistribution in the SR. Therefore, the reduction of Cx43 labeling noticed here in the SR is unlikely to have a great impact in spatial buffering of potassium during SE; moreover, as CA3 SR is well supplied by a vascular source [93], which in turn accounts for the degree of astrocyte coupling [94], such decrease of Cx43 labeling in this layer during epileptic activity may not have a significant impact in the physiology of CA3 SR cells.
Remarkably, our results disclosed enhancement of the non-phosphorylated form of Cx43 during the latent period, suggesting reduction of astrocyte coupling, since the unphosphorylated form is not related with the assembly into GJ [95], [96]. This result is quite in accordance with the immunofluorescence data, once both point to a smaller participation of Cx43-mediated GJ during the latent period, despite the increase in transcript levels at the same period, which could account for upregulation of protein levels in later time points.
In summary, we demonstrated the involvement of GJ channels in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy by describing the antiepileptiform effects of GJ blockade on pilocarpine-induced SE. Additionally, we depicted alterations of specific Cxs genes and protein, and changes in Cx distribution at different sites within the hippocampus throughout acute and latent periods. Taken together, our results revealed a reciprocal regulation of neuronal oscillations and electrical synapses, indicating that the control of Cx-mediated communication may take part in reliable anti-epileptogenic therapies.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Adilson S. Alves and Ana M. Alves for technical assistance.
Funding Statement
The work was supported by the following funders: FAPESP and CNPq. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Sohl G, Maxeiner S, Willecke K (2005) Expression and functions of neuronal gap junctions. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 191–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Perez Velazquez JL, Carlen PL (2000) Gap junctions, synchrony and seizures. Trends Neurosci 23: 68–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Nakase T, Naus CC (2004) Gap junctions and neurological disorders of the central nervous system. Biochim Biophys Acta 1662: 149–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bennett MV, Zukin RS (2004) Electrical coupling and neuronal synchronization in the Mammalian brain. Neuron 41: 495–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Perez-Velazquez JL, Valiante TA, Carlen PL (1994) Modulation of gap junctional mechanisms during calcium-free induced field burst activity: a possible role for electrotonic coupling in epileptogenesis. J Neurosci 14: 4308–4317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kohling R, Gladwell SJ, Bracci E, Vreugdenhil M, Jefferys JG (2001) Prolonged epileptiform bursting induced by 0-Mg(2+) in rat hippocampal slices depends on gap junctional coupling. Neuroscience 105: 579–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Traub RD, Bibbig R, Piechotta A, Draguhn R, Schmitz D (2001) Synaptic and nonsynaptic contributions to giant ipsps and ectopic spikes induced by 4-aminopyridine in the hippocampus in vitro. J Neurophysiol 85: 1246–1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Maier N, Guldenagel M, Sohl G, Siegmund H, Willecke K, et al. (2002) Reduction of high-frequency network oscillations (ripples) and pathological network discharges in hippocampal slices from connexin 36-deficient mice. J Physiol 541: 521–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bragin A, Mody I, Wilson CL, Engel J Jr (2002) Local generation of fast ripples in epileptic brain. J Neurosci 22: 2012–2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Szente M, Gajda Z, Said Ali K, Hermesz E (2002) Involvement of electrical coupling in the in vivo ictal epileptiform activity induced by 4-aminopyridine in the neocortex. Neuroscience 115: 1067–1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gajda Z, Gyengesi E, Hermesz E, Ali KS, Szente M (2003) Involvement of gap junctions in the manifestation and control of the duration of seizures in rats in vivo. Epilepsia 44: 1596–1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gigout S, Louvel J, Kawasaki H, D'Antuono M, Armand V, et al. (2006) Effects of gap junction blockers on human neocortical synchronization. Neurobiol Dis 22: 496–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Roopun AK, Simonotto JD, Pierce ML, Jenkins A, Nicholson C, et al. (2010) A nonsynaptic mechanism underlying interictal discharges in human epileptic neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 338–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Aronica E, Gorter JA, Jansen GH, Leenstra S, Yankaya B, et al. (2001) Expression of connexin 43 and connexin 32 gap-junction proteins in epilepsy-associated brain tumors and in the perilesional epileptic cortex. Acta Neuropathol 101: 449–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Fonseca CG, Green CR, Nicholson LF (2002) Upregulation in astrocytic connexin 43 gap junction levels may exacerbate generalized seizures in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Res 929: 105–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Collignon F, Wetjen NM, Cohen-Gadol AA, Cascino GD, Parisi J, et al. (2006) Altered expression of connexin subtypes in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy in humans. J Neurosurg 105: 77–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Sohl G, Guldenagel M, Beck H, Teubner B, Traub O, et al. (2000) Expression of connexin genes in hippocampus of kainate-treated and kindled rats under conditions of experimental epilepsy. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 83: 44–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Condorelli DF, Trovato-Salinaro A, Mudo G, Mirone MB, Belluardo N (2003) Cellular expression of connexins in the rat brain: neuronal localization, effects of kainate-induced seizures and expression in apoptotic neuronal cells. Eur J Neurosci 18: 1807–1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Beheshti S, Sayyah M, Golkar M, Sepehri H, Babaie J, et al. (2010) Changes in hippocampal connexin 36 mRNA and protein levels during epileptogenesis in the kindling model of epilepsy. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 34: 510–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Beaumont M, Maccaferri G (2011) Is connexin36 critical for GABAergic hypersynchronization in the hippocampus? J Physiol 589: 1663–1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Dere E, Zlomuzica A (2012) The role of gap junctions in the brain in health and disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36: 206–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Condorelli DF, Belluardo N, Trovato-Salinaro A, Mudo G (2000) Expression of Cx36 in mammalian neurons. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 32: 72–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Maxeiner S, Kruger O, Schilling K, Traub O, Urschel S, et al. (2003) Spatiotemporal transcription of connexin45 during brain development results in neuronal expression in adult mice. Neuroscience 119: 689–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Nagy JI, Dudek FE, Rash JE (2004) Update on connexins and gap junctions in neurons and glia in the mammalian nervous system. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 47: 191–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Timo-Iaria C, Negrao N, Schmidek WR, Hoshino K, Lobato de Menezes CE, et al. (1970) Phases and states of sleep in the rat. Physiol Behav 5: 1057–1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kihara AH, Moriscot AS, Ferreira PJ, Hamassaki DE (2005) Protecting RNA in fixed tissue: an alternative method for LCM users. J Neurosci Methods 148: 103–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Medhurst AD, Harrison DC, Read SJ, Campbell CA, Robbins MJ, et al. (2000) The use of TaqMan RT-PCR assays for semiquantitative analysis of gene expression in CNS tissues and disease models. J Neurosci Methods 98: 9–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kihara AH, Paschon V, Akamine PS, Saito KC, Leonelli M, et al. (2008) Differential expression of connexins during histogenesis of the chick retina. Dev Neurobiol 68: 1287–1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kinjo ER, Higa GS, de Sousa E, Casado OA, Damico MV, et al. (2013) A possible new mechanism for the control of miRNA expression in neurons. Exp Neurol 248: 546–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Cavalheiro EA (1995) The pilocarpine model of epilepsy. Ital J Neurol Sci 16: 33–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Curia G, Longo D, Biagini G, Jones RS, Avoli M (2008) The pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci Methods 172: 143–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Venance L, Rozov A, Blatow M, Burnashev N, Feldmeyer D, et al. (2000) Connexin expression in electrically coupled postnatal rat brain neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 10260–10265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Deans MR, Gibson JR, Sellitto C, Connors BW, Paul DL (2001) Synchronous activity of inhibitory networks in neocortex requires electrical synapses containing connexin36. Neuron 31: 477–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hormuzdi SG, Pais I, LeBeau FE, Towers SK, Rozov A, et al. (2001) Impaired electrical signaling disrupts gamma frequency oscillations in connexin 36-deficient mice. Neuron 31: 487–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chang WP, Wu JJ, Shyu BC (2013) Thalamic modulation of cingulate seizure activity via the regulation of gap junctions in mice thalamocingulate slice. PLoS One 8: e62952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Scorza FA, Arida RM, Naffah-Mazzacoratti Mda G, Scerni DA, Calderazzo L, et al. (2009) The pilocarpine model of epilepsy: what have we learned? An Acad Bras Cienc 81: 345–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Buzsaki G, Draguhn A (2004) Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 304: 1926–1929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Uhlhaas PJ, Singer W (2006) Neural synchrony in brain disorders: relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology. Neuron 52: 155–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Medvedev A, Mackenzie L, Hiscock JJ, Willoughby JO (2000) Kainic acid induces distinct types of epileptiform discharge with differential involvement of hippocampus and neocortex. Brain Res Bull 52: 89–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Lehmkuhle MJ, Thomson KE, Scheerlinck P, Pouliot W, Greger B, et al. (2009) A simple quantitative method for analyzing electrographic status epilepticus in rats. J Neurophysiol 101: 1660–1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Treiman DM, Walton NY, Kendrick C (1990) A progressive sequence of electroencephalographic changes during generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsy Res 5: 49–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Swank RL, Watson CW (1949) Effects of barbiturates and ether on spontaneous electrical activity of dog brain. J Neurophysiol 12: 137–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Rashkin MC, Youngs C, Penovich P (1987) Pentobarbital treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Neurology 37: 500–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Van Ness PC (1990) Pentobarbital and EEG burst suppression in treatment of status epilepticus refractory to benzodiazepines and phenytoin. Epilepsia 31: 61–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Meierkord H, Boon P, Engelsen B, Gocke K, Shorvon S, et al. (2010) EFNS guideline on the management of status epilepticus in adults. Eur J Neurol 17: 348–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Parviainen I, Uusaro A, Kalviainen R, Kaukanen E, Mervaala E, et al. (2002) High-dose thiopental in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in intensive care unit. Neurology 59: 1249–1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Ramsay RE (1993) Treatment of status epilepticus. Epilepsia 34 Suppl 1: S71–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Steriade M, Amzica F, Contreras D (1994) Cortical and thalamic cellular correlates of electroencephalographic burst-suppression. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90: 1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Kullmann DM, Moreau AW, Bakiri Y, Nicholson E (2012) Plasticity of inhibition. Neuron 75: 951–962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Buzsaki G (1997) Functions for interneuronal nets in the hippocampus. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 75: 508–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Soltesz I, Deschenes M (1993) Low- and high-frequency membrane potential oscillations during theta activity in CA1 and CA3 pyramidal neurons of the rat hippocampus under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia. J Neurophysiol 70: 97–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Postma F, Liu CH, Dietsche C, Khan M, Lee HK, et al. (2011) Electrical synapses formed by connexin36 regulate inhibition- and experience-dependent plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 13770–13775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Butovas S, Hormuzdi SG, Monyer H, Schwarz C (2006) Effects of electrically coupled inhibitory networks on local neuronal responses to intracortical microstimulation. J Neurophysiol 96: 1227–1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Rouach N, Segal M, Koulakoff A, Giaume C, Avignone E (2003) Carbenoxolone blockade of neuronal network activity in culture is not mediated by an action on gap junctions. J Physiol 553: 729–745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Vessey JP, Lalonde MR, Mizan HA, Welch NC, Kelly ME, et al. (2004) Carbenoxolone inhibition of voltage-gated Ca channels and synaptic transmission in the retina. J Neurophysiol 92: 1252–1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Jellinck PH, Monder C, McEwen BS, Sakai RR (1993) Differential inhibition of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase by carbenoxolone in rat brain regions and peripheral tissues. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 46: 209–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Schmitz D, Schuchmann S, Fisahn A, Draguhn A, Buhl EH, et al. (2001) Axo-axonal coupling. a novel mechanism for ultrafast neuronal communication. Neuron 31: 831–840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Draguhn A, Traub RD, Schmitz D, Jefferys JG (1998) Electrical coupling underlies high-frequency oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro. Nature 394: 189–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ross FM, Gwyn P, Spanswick D, Davies SN (2000) Carbenoxolone depresses spontaneous epileptiform activity in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. Neuroscience 100: 789–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Paschon V, Higa GS, Resende RR, Britto LR, Kihara AH (2012) Blocking of connexin-mediated communication promotes neuroprotection during acute degeneration induced by mechanical trauma. PLoS One 7: e45449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. de Pina-Benabou MH, Szostak V, Kyrozis A, Rempe D, Uziel D, et al. (2005) Blockade of gap junctions in vivo provides neuroprotection after perinatal global ischemia. Stroke 36: 2232–2237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Striedinger K, Petrasch-Parwez E, Zoidl G, Napirei M, Meier C, et al. (2005) Loss of connexin36 increases retinal cell vulnerability to secondary cell loss. Eur J Neurosci 22: 605–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Volgyi B, Pan F, Paul DL, Wang JT, Huberman AD, et al. (2013) Gap junctions are essential for generating the correlated spike activity of neighboring retinal ganglion cells. PLoS One 8: e69426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Cusato K, Bosco A, Rozental R, Guimaraes CA, Reese BE, et al. (2003) Gap junctions mediate bystander cell death in developing retina. J Neurosci 23: 6413–6422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Kihara AH, Santos TO, Osuna-Melo EJ, Paschon V, Vidal KS, et al. (2010) Connexin-mediated communication controls cell proliferation and is essential in retinal histogenesis. Int J Dev Neurosci 28: 39–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Pais I, Hormuzdi SG, Monyer H, Traub RD, Wood IC, et al. (2003) Sharp wave-like activity in the hippocampus in vitro in mice lacking the gap junction protein connexin 36. J Neurophysiol 89: 2046–2054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Jacobson GM, Voss LJ, Melin SM, Mason JP, Cursons RT, et al. (2010) Connexin36 knockout mice display increased sensitivity to pentylenetetrazol-induced seizure-like behaviors. Brain Res 1360: 198–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Gajda Z, Szupera Z, Blazso G, Szente M (2005) Quinine, a blocker of neuronal cx36 channels, suppresses seizure activity in rat neocortex in vivo. Epilepsia 46: 1581–1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Fujikawa DG (2005) Prolonged seizures and cellular injury: understanding the connection. Epilepsy Behav 7 Suppl 3: S3–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Fujikawa DG (1996) The temporal evolution of neuronal damage from pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. Brain Res 725: 11–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Pitkanen A, Lukasiuk K (2009) Molecular and cellular basis of epileptogenesis in symptomatic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 14 Suppl 1: 16–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Pestana RR, Kinjo ER, Hernandes MS, Britto LR (2010) Reactive oxygen species generated by NADPH oxidase are involved in neurodegeneration in the pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurosci Lett 484: 187–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Weise J, Engelhorn T, Dorfler A, Aker S, Bahr M, et al. (2005) Expression time course and spatial distribution of activated caspase-3 after experimental status epilepticus: contribution of delayed neuronal cell death to seizure-induced neuronal injury. Neurobiol Dis 18: 582–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Weickert S, Ray A, Zoidl G, Dermietzel R (2005) Expression of neural connexins and pannexin1 in the hippocampus and inferior olive: a quantitative approach. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 133: 102–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Zhang XL, Zhang L, Carlen PL (2004) Electrotonic coupling between stratum oriens interneurones in the intact in vitro mouse juvenile hippocampus. J Physiol 558: 825–839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Zhang Y, Perez Velazquez JL, Tian GF, Wu CP, Skinner FK, et al. (1998) Slow oscillations (</ = 1 Hz) mediated by GABAergic interneuronal networks in rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 18: 9256–9268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Gambardella A, Gotman J, Cendes F, Andermann F (1995) Focal intermittent delta activity in patients with mesiotemporal atrophy: a reliable marker of the epileptogenic focus. Epilepsia 36: 122–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kirkpatrick MP, Clarke CD, Sonmezturk HH, Abou-Khalil B (2011) Rhythmic delta activity represents a form of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis. Epilepsy Behav 20: 392–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Traub RD, Whittington MA, Buhl EH, LeBeau FE, Bibbig A, et al. (2001) A possible role for gap junctions in generation of very fast EEG oscillations preceding the onset of, and perhaps initiating, seizures. Epilepsia 42: 153–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Avoli M (1996) GABA-mediated synchronous potentials and seizure generation. Epilepsia 37: 1035–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Taira T, Lamsa K, Kaila K (1997) Posttetanic excitation mediated by GABA(A) receptors in rat CA1 pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol 77: 2213–2218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Uusisaari M, Smirnov S, Voipio J, Kaila K (2002) Spontaneous epileptiform activity mediated by GABA(A) receptors and gap junctions in the rat hippocampal slice following long-term exposure to GABA(B) antagonists. Neuropharmacology 43: 563–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Zsiros V, Aradi I, Maccaferri G (2007) Propagation of postsynaptic currents and potentials via gap junctions in GABAergic networks of the rat hippocampus. J Physiol 578: 527–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Perkins KL (2002) GABA application to hippocampal CA3 or CA1 stratum lacunosum-moleculare excites an interneuron network. J Neurophysiol 87: 1404–1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Steward O (1976) Topographic organization of the projections from the entorhinal area to the hippocampal formation of the rat. J Comp Neurol 167: 285–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Rouach N, Koulakoff A, Abudara V, Willecke K, Giaume C (2008) Astroglial metabolic networks sustain hippocampal synaptic transmission. Science 322: 1551–1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Giaume C, Koulakoff A, Roux L, Holcman D, Rouach N (2010) Astroglial networks: a step further in neuroglial and gliovascular interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 11: 87–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Xu L, Zeng LH, Wong M (2009) Impaired astrocytic gap junction coupling and potassium buffering in a mouse model of tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurobiol Dis 34: 291–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Theis M, Sohl G, Eiberger J, Willecke K (2005) Emerging complexities in identity and function of glial connexins. Trends Neurosci 28: 188–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Binder DK, Steinhauser C (2006) Functional changes in astroglial cells in epilepsy. Glia 54: 358–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Lin JH, Lou N, Kang N, Takano T, Hu F, et al. (2008) A central role of connexin 43 in hypoxic preconditioning. J Neurosci 28: 681–695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Wallraff A, Kohling R, Heinemann U, Theis M, Willecke K, et al. (2006) The impact of astrocytic gap junctional coupling on potassium buffering in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 26: 5438–5447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Coyle P (1978) Spatial features of the rat hippocampal vascular system. Exp Neurol 58: 549–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. D'Ambrosio R, Wenzel J, Schwartzkroin PA, McKhann GM 2nd, Janigro D (1998) Functional specialization and topographic segregation of hippocampal astrocytes. J Neurosci 18: 4425–4438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Crow DS, Beyer EC, Paul DL, Kobe SS, Lau AF (1990) Phosphorylation of connexin43 gap junction protein in uninfected and Rous sarcoma virus-transformed mammalian fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 10: 1754–1763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Hossain MZ, Murphy LJ, Hertzberg EL, Nagy JI (1994) Phosphorylated forms of connexin43 predominate in rat brain: demonstration by rapid inactivation of brain metabolism. J Neurochem 62: 2394–2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]