Abstract
We report the draft genome sequences of three vancomycin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. S. aureus strain MV8 is a sequence type 8 (ST-8) staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element type IV (SCCmec IV) derivative, while the other two strains (S. aureus MM25 and MM61) are ST-5 SCCmec II strains. MM61 is also closely related to the heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus strain MM66.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Here, we report the draft genome sequences of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains MM25, MM61, and MV8 (Table 1). These strains, along with the heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) strain MM66 (1), were isolated from hospitals in Las Cruces, New Mexico (2). The SmaI chromosomal DNA pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of MM61 and MM66 demonstrated that these strains are clonal (2).
TABLE 1.
Draft genome information
| Strain | Coverage (×)a | No. of scaffolds (≥1 kb) | Draft genome size (Mb) | No. of RAST predicted features | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM25 | 621 | 57 | 2.89 | 2,734 | CCCE000000000 |
| MM61 | 614 | 78 | 2.96 | 2,815 | CCCA000000000 |
| MV8 | 686 | 81 | 3.03 | 2,816 | CCCL000000000 |
Based on a genome size estimate of 3 Mbp.
Genomic libraries were constructed using the Phusion Illumina genomic DNA library protocol (average insert size, 380 bp) and sequenced with the Illumina Genome Analyzer II 90-bp paired-end reads. The raw sequence reads were then screened for sequencing artifacts and ΦX contamination. De novo assemblies were generated using filtered sequence reads utilizing the ABySS version 1.3.7 assembler (3). The GapCloser version 1.12-r6 module from the Short Oligonucleotide Analysis Package (SOAP) (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/) (4) was used to attempt to resolve the N-spacers introduced in the assembly scaffolding process. After the gap filling process, the percentage of gaps was <0.03% per strain, and scaffolds ≥1 kb were retained in the final assembly. An assembly assessment for validation was performed by mapping high-quality Illumina reads back to the assembly using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) (5). A high percentage of reads mapped uniquely to the assemblies in each strain (>95% uniquely mapped back, with >90% properly paired for all strains), validating the de novo assembly process. Gene prediction and annotation of final assemblies were carried out using RAST (6), incorporating the Glimmer algorithm (7, 8).
The G+C content of all strains (~33%) was similar to that of sequenced S. aureus strains (9), as determined by GAEMR evaluation (http://www.broadinstitute.org/software/gaemr/). Sequence analysis revealed that MM25 and MM61 are from multilocus sequence type 5 (ST-5) (http://saureus.mlst.net/) and possess a staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec element type II (SCCmec II) (http://www.ccrbtyping.net/), while strain MV8 is from ST-8 and harbors SCCmec IV. Out of the 152 MRSA strains analyzed in Delgado et al. (2), 123 were resistant to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, and erythromycin. The draft genomes of all three strains revealed the presence of ermA, which supports clindamycin and erythromycin resistance (10). Fluoroquinolone resistance in S. aureus is mediated by mutations in the genes encoding DNA gyrase (gyrA) or topoisomerase IV (grlA) subunits (11–13). MM25 and MM61 harbor gyrA and grlA mutations that lead to amino acid alterations in GyrA (S84L) and GrlA (S80F), respectively. MM25 also has another mutation in grlA leading to an alteration in GrlA (E84G). MM61 also harbors tetM, which encodes tetracycline resistance (14).
Vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strains, including hVISA, emerge in vivo or in vitro following vancomycin exposure, and these mutants often possess chromosomal mutation(s) that lead to altered cell wall metabolism (15). None of the three MRSA draft genomes contained the VISA-associated graS mutation previously found in MM66 and MM66 derivatives exhibiting altered vancomycin susceptibility (1). hVISA, VISA, and vancomycin-susceptible related strain sets (e.g., MM66, MM66 derivatives, and MM61) are routinely exploited to decipher mutations associated with S. aureus vancomycin-intermediate resistance mechanisms (15).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
These draft genome projects have been deposited at DDBL/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers described in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge prior support from the National Institutes of Health (SC1GM083882-01 (to J.E.G.) and P20GM103451 [NM-INBRE program]), as well as the Oklahoma Agricultural Experimental Station.
Footnotes
Citation Ramaraj T, Matyi SA, Sundararajan A, Lindquist IE, Devitt NP, Schilkey FD, Lamichhane-Khadka R, Hoyt PR, Mudge J, Gustafson JE. 2014. Draft genome sequences of vancomycin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus related to heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus. Genome Announc. 2(5):e01033-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01033-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Matyi SA, Ramaraj T, Sundararajan A, Lindquist IE, Devitt NP, Schilkey FD, Lamichhane-Khadka R, Hoyt PR, Mudge J, Gustafson JE. 2014. Draft genomes of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strain MM66 and MM66 derivatives with altered vancomycin resistance levels. Genome Announc. 2(4):e00688-14. 10.1128/genomeA.00688-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Delgado A, Riordan JT, Lamichhane-Khadka R, Winnett DC, Jimenez J, Robinson K, O’Brien FG, Cantore SA, Gustafson JE. 2007. Hetero-vancomycin-intermediate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate from a medical center in Las Cruces, New Mexico. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1325–1329. 10.1128/JCM.02437-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJ, Birol I. 2009. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 19:1117–1123. 10.1101/gr.089532.108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Pan Q, Liu Y, Tang J, Wu G, Zhang H, Shi Y, Liu Y, Yu C, Wang B, Lu Y, Han C, Cheung DW, Yiu SM, Peng S, Xiaoqian Z, Liu G, Liao X, Li Y, Yang H, Wang J, Lam TW, Wang J. 2012. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience. 1:18. 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gill SR, Fouts DE, Archer GL, Mongodin EF, Deboy RT, Ravel J, Paulsen IT, Kolonay JF, Brinkac L, Beanan M, Dodson RJ, Daugherty SC, Madupu R, Angiuoli SV, Durkin AS, Haft DH, Vamathevan J, Khouri H, Utterback T, Lee C, Dimitrov G, Jiang L, Qin H, Weidman J, Tran K, Kang K, Hance IR, Nelson KE, Fraser CM. 2005. Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain. J. Bacteriol. 187:2426–2438. 10.1128/JB.187.7.2426-2438.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White O. 1998. Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:544–548. 10.1093/nar/26.2.544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Fiebelkorn KR, Crawford SA, McElmeel ML, Jorgensen JH. 2003. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4740–4744. 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4740-4744.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wang T, Tanaka M, Sato K. 1998. Detection of grlA and gyrA mutations in 344 Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:236–240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Yoon EJ, Lee CY, Shim MJ, Min YH, Kwon AR, Lee J, Choi EC. 2010. Extended spectrum of quinolone resistance, even to a potential latter third-generation agent, as a result of a minimum of two GrlA and two GyrA alterations in quinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Chemotherapy 56:153–157. 10.1159/000313529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Costa SS, Falcão C, Viveiros M, Machado D, Martins M, Melo-Cristino J, Amaral L, Couto I. 2011. Exploring the contribution of efflux on the resistance to fluoroquinolones in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Microbiol. 11:241. 10.1186/1471-2180-11-241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Trzcinski K, Cooper BS, Hryniewicz W, Dowson CG. 2000. Expression of resistance to tetracyclines in strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45:763–770. 10.1093/jac/45.6.763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Howden BP, Davies JK, Johnson PD, Stinear TP, Grayson ML. 2010. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23:99–139. 10.1128/CMR.00042-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
