Skip to main content
Eye logoLink to Eye
letter
. 2014 Jul 11;28(10):1266–1267. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.149

Patterns of ocular injury from paintball trauma

V L Tseng 1, J G Linakis 2,3,4, M J Mello 2,4, P B Greenberg 5,6,*
PMCID: PMC4194324  PMID: 25012638

Sir,

Paintballs pose a significant risk for devastating ocular trauma.1 ASTM International2 regularly publishes eye protection standards for paintball, and guidelines from the National Professional Paintball League3 in the United States require that players exposed to shooting areas wear eye protection that meets these standards. ASTM International has updated their standards four times since 1999, most recently in 2012. To assess the impact of these guidelines, this study investigated the patterns of ocular paintball trauma that presented to US emergency departments (EDs) from 2001 to 2010.

The study received Institutional Review Board exemption from Rhode Island Hospital. Data were extracted from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS-CPSC) and reviewed for demographics, diagnosis, locale, and eye protection status.4 Patients were included if they visited an ED from 2001 to 2010 with an injury that (1) involved paintball equipment and (2) affected the eye. Weighted estimates were calculated using SAS version 9.1.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

All statistical estimates represent weighted frequencies based on data from 100 representative US EDs. Of 11 827 paintball-related eye injuries from 2001 to 2010 (Table 1), most occurred in patients who were male (10 906; 92.2%) and aged 10–19 years (8055; 68.1%). The highest proportion of injuries occurred from 2001 to 2004 (13.7–15.2%). Of 1586 patients with eye protection data, 724 (45.6%) removed protection immediately before injury and 863 (54.4%) were not wearing protection.

Table 1. Demographics and characteristics of patients with ocular paintball trauma in the United States from 2001 to 2010.

Characteristic Actual frequency; n=333 National estimates (95% confidence interval); n=11 827a Percentage of patients with ocular paintball injury
Gender
 Male 302 10 906 (9837–11 976) 92.2
 Female 31 921 (490–1352)b 7.8
       
Age
 0–9 years 22 453 (156–750)b 3.8
 10–19 years 228 8055 (7007–9102) 68.1
 20–29 years 51 2138 (1464–2813) 18.1
 ≥30 years 32 1181 (675–1688)b 10.0
       
Race
 White 177 6947 (5892–8001) 58.7
 Black/African American 27 665 (328–1003)b 5.6
 Unknown 97 3295 (2510–4080) 27.9
 Other 32 920 (497–1343)b 7.8
       
Coded diagnosis
 Contusions, abrasions 163 6081 (1074–7089) 51.4
 Dermatitis, conjunctivitis 4 100 (0–229)b 0.8
 Foreign body 6 208 (0–442)b 1.8
 Hematoma 6 214 (0–428)b 1.8
 Hemorrhage 18 360 (104–616)b 3.0
 Internal injury 1 60 (0–180)b 0.5
 Laceration 7 306 (30–582)b 2.6
 Nerve damage 2 31 (0–73)b 0.3
 Puncture 4 179 (0–400)b 1.5
 Strain or sprain 2 85 (0–223)b 0.7
 Other/not stated 120 4203 (3351–5055) 35.5
       
Locale
 Home 84 3262 (2451–4074) 27.6
 Public property 17 596 (222–970)b 5.0
 Recreation/sports venue 54 2635 (1872–3398) 22.3
 Street/highway 2 22 (0–54)b 0.2
 Not recorded 176 5312 (4415–6210) 44.9
       
Year of injury
 2001 41 1802 (1386–2218) 15.2
 2002 40 1649 (1281–2016) 13.9
 2003 50 1625 (1228–2021) 13.7
 2004 49 1802 (1379–2225) 15.2
 2005 40 1152 (810–1493)b 9.7
 2006 40 1344 (960–1728) 11.4
 2007 18 680 (404–956)b 5.7
 2008 14 519 (263–776)b 4.4
 2009 25 918 (640–1196)b 7.8
 2010 16 336 (148–523)b 2.8
a

Weighted frequencies based on 100 representative emergency departments in the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System.

b

Estimates with frequencies <20, weighted frequencies <1200, and/or coefficient of variation >0.3 may not be statistically stable based on guidelines from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System.

This study found that ocular paintball injuries are decreasing over time but – despite clearly defined eye protection guidelines – remain a persistent challenge, especially in males and young patients. Several injuries were related to removing or not using eye protection. Moreover, similar proportions of injuries occurred at home and in commercial settings. This suggests the need for further enforcement of eye protection protocols, regardless of locale.

The interpretation of the type and severity of injuries was limited by minimal ocular code-based data within NEISS-CPSC.4 In addition, the NEISS-CPSC did not include cases that presented outside of EDs.

In conclusion, additional strategies are needed to reduce the incidence of preventable paintball injuries, including placing age or licensure limitations on paintball equipment sales and better enforcement of eye protection requirements.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alliman KJ, Smiddy WE, Banta J, Qureshi Y, Miller DM, Schiffman JC. Ocular trauma and visual outcome secondary to paintball projectiles. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:239–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ASTM International ASTM Standard F1776-10, “Standard Specification for Eye Protective Devices for Paintball Sports” ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2010. doi: 10.1520/F1776-10, , www.astm.org . [Google Scholar]
  3. National Professional Paintball League. Official Rule Book. 2012. Available at: : http://nppl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/NPPLRulebook2012.pdf . Accessed 15 December 2013.
  4. US Consumer Product Safety Commission. National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) On-Line. 2013. Available at: : http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Research—Statistics/NEISS-Injury-Data/ . Accessed 30 June 2013.

Articles from Eye are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES