Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014 Apr 10;34(6):1193–1198. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302931

Fibrin-Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Allows In Vivo Quantification of Thrombus Fibrin Content and Identifies Thrombi Amenable for Thrombolysis

Marcelo E Andia 1,#, Prakash Saha 1,#, Julia Jenkins 1, Bijan Modarai 1, Andrea J Wiethoff 1, Alkystis Phinikaridou 1, Steven P Grover 1, Ashish S Patel 1, Tobias Schaeffter 1, Alberto Smith 1,, Rene M Botnar 1,
PMCID: PMC4195984  EMSID: EMS60197  PMID: 24723557

Abstract

Objective

Deep venous thrombosis is a major health problem. Thrombolytic therapies are effective in recanalizing the veins and preventing post-thrombotic complications, but there is no consensus on selection criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate a fibrin-specific MRI contrast agent (EP-2104R) for the accurate quantification of thrombus’ fibrin content in vivo and for the identification of thrombus suitable for thrombolysis.

Approach and Results

Venous thrombosis was induced in the inferior vena cava of 8- to 10-week-old male BALB/C mice and MRI performed 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, and 21 days later. Eighteen mice were scanned at each time point pre and 2 hours post injection of EP-2104R (8.0 μmol/kg) with 12 mice at each time point used to correlate fibrin contrast uptake with thrombus’ histological stage and fibrin content. Six mice at each time point were immediately subjected to intravascular thrombolytic therapy (10 mg/kg of tissue-type plasminogen activator). Mice were imaged to assess response to lytic therapy 24 hours after thrombolytic treatment. Two mice at each time point were scanned post injection of 0.2 mmol/kg of Gd-DTPA (gadolinium with diethylenetriaminepentacetate, Magnevist, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) for control purpose. Contrast uptake was correlated positively with the fibrin content of the thrombus measured by Western blotting (R2=0.889; P<0.001). Thrombus relaxation rate (R1) post contrast and the change in visualized thrombus size on late gadolinium enhancement inversion recovery MRI pre–EP-2104R and post–EP-2104R injection were the best predictors for successful thrombolysis (area under the curve, 0.989 [95% confidence interval, 0.97–1.00] and 0.994 [95% confidence interval, 0.98–1.00] respectively).

Conclusions

MRI with a fibrin-specific contrast agent accurately estimates thrombus fibrin content in vivo and identifies thrombi that are amenable for thrombolysis.

Keywords: fibrin, magnetic resonance imaging, molecular imaging, thrombolytic therapy, venous thrombosis


Deep vein thrombosis has an annual incidence of ≈1 to 2 per 1000 people.1-3 This condition can give rise to the post-thrombotic syndrome, which is a major cause of morbidity,4,5 and pulmonary emboli, which may be fatal.6-8 The main-stay of current treatment involves anticoagulation to prevent thrombus propagation,2 but this has little effect on the resolution of a thrombus.4,8,9 A recent randomized control trial has shown that early vein recanalization by thrombolysis reduces post-thrombotic complications in patients with acute proximal deep venous thrombosis.10 The advent of pharmacomechanical systems to deliver thrombolytics efficiently has also prompted a more aggressive approach to the treatment of this condition.11-13

Thrombolysis is indicated for young thrombi, with older thrombi thought to be less responsive to this treatment. Clinical history and signs at presentation used to determine thrombus age are, however, subjective and unreliable.12,14 Thrombus age is also not always an informative determinant of the susceptibility to lysis. Not all fresh thrombi respond to this treatment, which unnecessarily exposes some patients to hemorrhagic complications, whereas some patients with older thrombi seem to respond well.12,15,16 An objective method capable of identifying thrombi susceptible to lysis is therefore needed.16-18

Venous thrombi resolve by a process of organization that leads to vein recanalization.19-21 During this process, the structure of the thrombus changes with cross-linked fibrin being gradually replaced by collagen.19-24 Experimental data suggest that thrombi, rich in fibrin, are more susceptible to thrombolysis than organized, collagen-rich thrombi.25 As thrombolytic therapies target fibrin within a thrombus, we hypothesized that this molecule represents an imaging target that could better direct lytic therapy.17,24,26 A gadolinium-based fibrin-specific MRI (FSMRI) contrast agent has been used to detect arterial and venous thrombi in both animal models and man.27-32

In this study, we sought to investigate whether this fibrin-specific contrast agent allows estimation of the fibrin content of resolving venous thrombi and indicates thrombi that are susceptible fibrinolysis.

Results

R1 Relaxivity After Administration of EP-2104R During Thrombus Resolution

In precontrast images the average blood relaxation rate (R1) was 0.68±0.04 s−1, whereas in post–EP-2104R images the average blood R1, 2 hours after contrast agent, was 0.74±0.03 s−1 (P<0.01). Thrombus signal intensity and R1 were greater after administration of EP-2104R, compared with precontrast images and Gd-DTPA controls (Figure 1). The difference between R1 of thrombus post and pre contrast (ΔR1) changed during thrombus resolution (P<0.001, 1-way ANOVA) and was greatest at days 7 (ΔR1=0.945±0.049 s−1; P<0.01; Bonferroni post hoc test compared with day 2) and 10 (ΔR1=1.005±0.054 s−1; P<0.01; Bonferroni post hoc test compared with day 2; Figure 1A and 1C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A, Changes in thrombus relaxation rate ΔR1 (s−1) pre–EP-2104R and post–EP-2104R administration at different time point during thrombus organization. Greatest differences in ΔR1 pre and post contrast are observed at days 7 and 10. B, Thrombus gadolinium concentration (μmol/L) mirrored the changes in R1 over time. C, R1 mapping images pre–EP-2104R and post–EP-2104R injection and Martius Scarlet Blue (MSB) histology sections at the corresponding levels and fibrin selective segmentation. Gd-DTPA indicates gadolinium with diethylenetriaminepentacetate (Magnevist, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany).

The mean gadolinium concentration in thrombus of mice injected with EP-2104R mirrored the changes in R1 over time, reaching a maximum gadolinium concentration at days 7 (886±131 μmol/L) and 10 (1116±155 μmol/L; P<0.001; 1-way ANOVA; Figure 1B). Traces of gadolinium (<10 μmol/L) were detected in thrombus post injection of Gd-DTPA, but did not change during thrombus organization.

Fibrin Content of the Thrombus During Its Resolution

The fibrin content of the thrombus changed during its resolution (Figure 2A and 2B). Fibrin content was greatest at days 7 and 10 after induction. Fibrin content at days 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, and 21 was 1.7±1.1, 5.2±1.4, 9.3±1.9, 9.6±1.4, 6.6±2.4, and 0.9±1.0, respectively (P<0.01; 1-way ANOVA; Figure IIIA in the online-only Data Supplement). The fibrin content of the thrombus correlated with thrombus R1 (R2=0.89; P<0.001; Figure 2B), and the average fibrin content at each time point correlated with the average thrombus gadolinium concentration after the administration of EP-2104R (R2=0.95; P<0.001; Figure 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A, Western blot fibrin quantification during venous thrombus organization at different time points. B, Relation between thrombus R1 post–EP-2104R administration and its relative fibrin content measured with Western blot at different time points during thrombus organization (R2=0.889; P<0.001). C, Average thrombus gadolinium content and relative fibrin content at different time points during thrombus organization (R2=0.953; P<0.001).

Change in R1 Relaxation Rate After Thrombolysis

The inferior vena cava (IVC) blood flow in normal mice, without thrombus, was 0.55±0.05 mL/min. Blood flow in the IVC was not detected 2 days after the induction of thrombosis, and no significant differences were observed in the IVC blood flow at days 2, 4, and 7. After day 7 of thrombus induction, the IVC flow was seen to increase (Figure IIIB in the online-only Data Supplement). Thrombolysis was most effective between days 7 and 14 (Figure 3A; Figure IVA in the online-only Data Supplement), when ΔR1 was greatest after the administration of EP-2104R (Figure 3B). The R1 relaxation rate before the administration of the contrast agent resulted in a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 93% to predict successful lysis when R1 was >1.30 s−1. The thrombus R1 relaxation rate after the administration of EP-2104R improved the sensitivity and specificity to predict successful thrombolysis to 94% and 99%, respectively, when R1 thrombus relaxation rate was >1.59 s−1 post–EP-2104R injection.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A, Inferior vena cava (IVC) blood flow change pre- and post-thrombolytic treatment and percentage of lysis. Mice at days 7, 10, and 14 showed the greatest change in the IVC blood flow pre and post lysis, and the highest percentage of lysis. B, Percentage of lysis obtained after thrombolytic treatment and its corresponding change in R1 value (ΔR1) determined from pre- and postcontrast R1 maps. The highest rate of successful lysis was observed at days 7, 10, and 14 after thrombus induction.

Change in Visualized Thrombus After Administration of EP-2104R

Administration of EP-2104R increased the visualized thrombus volume. The difference between visualized thrombus volume pre and post contrast (ΔVt) is largest between days 7 and 14 on late gadolinium enhancement-FSMRI (Figure 4C; Figure IVB in the online-only Data Supplement). Mice with the greatest change in visualized thrombus volume, ΔVt, after the administration of EP-2104R were most susceptible to lysis (Figure 4; Figure IVB and IVC in the online-only Data Supplement). Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated that visualized thrombus volume before the administration of EP-2104R, Vt, was not a good predictor of successful lysis (area under the curve=0.748; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.92), but after the administration of EP-2104R, the visualized difference in thrombus volume, ΔVt, on late gadolinium enhancement-FSMRI had an area under the curve of 0.972 (95% confidence interval, 0.95–1.00), and an increase in visualized thrombus volume larger than ΔVt=3.5 mm3 had a sensitivity and specificity to determine successful lysis of 99% and 95%, respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Representative 3-dimensional thrombus reconstructed images pre–EP-2104R and post–EP-2104R injection and R1 maps at 3 levels of the inferior vena cava (IVC) for a (A) unsuccessfully and (B) successfully lysed thrombus. Successful thrombolysis was associated with a larger visualized difference in enhanced thrombus volume, ΔVt, measured from pre–EP-2104R and post–EP-2104R late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images and greater change in R1 post–EP-2104R injection. Unsuccessful thrombolysis was associated with a small difference in enhancement between pre–EP-2104R and post–EP-2104R LGE scans and smaller change in R1 post–EP-2104R injection. Recovery of IVC flow was observed in the successfully lysed cases (arrows). C, Successfully lysed thrombi showed a greater change in enhancement after EP-2104R administration.

Multivariate regression analysis showed that the change in the visualized thrombus volume pre and post contrast (ΔVt) and the R1 relaxation rate postcontrast administration were independent variables that significantly correlated with the change in the IVC blood flow pre and post contrast, β coefficients of 0.087 (P=0.001) and 2.383 (P=0.003), respectively.

Discussion

Tissue-type plasminogen activator, the main lytic agent used in clinical practice, specifically targets fibrin found in thrombus.23 In vivo quantification of the thrombus fibrin content has, therefore, the potential to direct therapy, both in terms of identifying patients suitable for treatment and in titering the dose of tissue-type plasminogen activator required. We have demonstrated previously that an FSMRI contrast agent, EP-2104R, can visualize acute thrombi in both experimental models and man27-32 but have never quantified previously the changes in contrast agent uptake during thrombus resolution. In this study, we show that uptake of the fibrin-specific contrast agent, EP-2104R, correlates with the fibrin content of a murine thrombus during its resolution and that thrombi with high EP-2104R uptake are more susceptible to lysis by tissue-type plasminogen activator.

The change in R1 relaxation rate and gadolinium content of murine thrombi after administration of EP-2104R was greatest between days 7 and 10 after thrombus induction. Although conventional wisdom suggests that fibrin content is greatest in the early thrombus, in this and our previous studies, we have shown that the fibrin content of thrombus in our model varies over time, with the highest content found at 7 to 10 days.33 Here, we also showed that the changes in fibrin content of the thrombus correlate well with the spatial and temporal uptake of EP-2104R. These data suggest, therefore, that quantification of EP-2104R uptake could be used as an in vivo measure of thrombus fibrin content.

Venous thrombus resolution in our murine model of thrombosis naturally occurs during a period of 4 weeks in a process reminiscent of wound healing.20-22 Accumulation of inflammatory cells and their mediators orchestrates resolution through processes involving fibrinolysis, proteolysis, and neovascularization.23 In the early thrombus, red blood cells are trapped within strands of fibrin and form the main body of thrombus. As the thrombus resolves, thicker mature fibrin strands predominate and are subsequently replaced by other extracellular matrix proteins, including collagen.20 As this process progresses, the thrombus gradually becomes incorporated into the vein wall. Thrombus resolution is therefore a dynamic process during which its structure changes over time. We have demonstrated previously that iron-processing mechanisms after the lysis of trapped red blood cells in thrombus determine its longitudinal (T1) relaxation time and that quantification of the relaxation rate (R1) can be used as a surrogate measure of thrombus fibrin content.33 Direct thrombus R1 estimation can therefore be used to identify thrombi that are suitable for lysis. However, the data in this study show that by specific targeting of fibrin using the novel contrast agent, EP-2104R, it is possible to significantly improve the sensitivity and specificity of this selection.

R1 rate without contrast agent cannot be used to determine the age of a thrombus. Short thrombus R1 rates indicate early or mature thrombus, which limits its clinical use if used alone. In addition, despite the development of fast T1-mapping protocols, long scan times are still required to accurately quantify thrombus R1 in vivo, whereas postprocessing software needs careful analysis. Faster late gadolinium enhancement sequences are readily available on commercial MRI scanners and do not require sophisticated postprocessing tools for analysis as needed for R1 maps. In this study, we used late gadolinium enhancement sequences with our fibrin-specific contrast agent and showed that an increase in the volume of visualized thrombus after the administration of EP-2104R was associated with thrombi that were most amenable to lysis. Although this combination has improved significantly the speed of analysis, 1 limitation is that a pre- and postcontrast agent scan is required.

Conclusions

These data show that the uptake of an FSMRI contrast agent, EP-2104R, changes during the resolution of an experimental venous thrombus. These changes strongly correlate with the fibrin content of the thrombus and uptake of the contrast agent can be used to identify thrombi that are susceptible to fibrinolysis. Although this study was conducted in an experimental model of thrombosis, it was performed using a clinical 3-Tesla field strength MRI scanner. Given that we used sequences that are readily available on commercial MRI scanners, and the safety of this contrast agent is already proven in man,34 EP-2104R should now be tested in the clinical setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Venous thrombosis mouse model

Venous thrombosis was induced in the inferior vena cava (IVC) of 8-10wk (25-30g) male BALB/C mice (n=120) using an established technique that involves reduced blood flow and mechanical endothelial disruption1-3. All procedures used in these studies were licensed under the United Kingdom Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.

Characterisation of fibrin-specific contrast uptake during resolution

MRI was carried out at 2, 4, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days after thrombus induction (n=12/time-point, Supplementary Figure 1A). Mice were imaged before and 2hrs after tail vein injection of a gadolinium based, fibrin-specific contrast agent: EP-2104R (EPIX Pharmaceuticals, Lexington, MA)4-6 and a dose of 8μmol/kg of EP-2104R dissolved in 20μl of saline was used4, 5, 7. EP-2104R is a Gd-based, fibrin-binding contrast agent with four Gd chelates per molecule4, 5, 8. This agent has a specificity for fibrin 100-fold larger than the specificity for fibrinogen and 1000-fold larger than the specificity for serum albumin4. The fibrin scans were carried out 2hrs after EP-2104R injection to allow for contrast agent blood clearance and to minimize background signal5,8, 9. Immediately after scanning, the IVC and thrombus were harvested for: gadolinium quantification using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (n=4/time-point); western blot analysis of fibrin content (n=4/time-point) and histological analysis (n=4/time-point). Additional mice (n=2/time-point) were scanned at each time point post injection of 0.2mmol/kg of Gd-DTPA (Magnevist, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) and the thrombi were analysed with ICP-MS to quantify non-specific contrast uptake.

Lysis

In further groups of animals, thrombus was imaged with EP-2104R at 2, 4, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days after thrombus induction (n=6/time-point, Supplementary Figure 1B), before undergoing thrombolysis with 10mg/kg of tissue plasminogen activator (Actilyse, Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany), infused via the tail vein over 5mins. 24hrs after thrombolysis, mice were imaged again after EP-2104R injection to examine the size of the remaining thrombus and the blood flow in the IVC calculated.

In vivo MRI protocol

Mice were anesthetized with 1.5-2% isofluorane and 100% oxygen delivered through a nose cone and scanned in prone position on a 3T Philips Achieva Gyroscan scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) equipped with a clinical gradient system (30mT m−1, 200mT/m/ms) and a single–loop receiver-only surface coil (diameter=47mm). Following a 3D gradient echo (GRE) scout scan, arterial and venous time-of-flight angiography (TOF) was performed as followed: arterial TOF with TR=40ms, TE=6.2ms, flip angle=60°, FOV=20×33×17mm, acquired matrix=68×110, slice thickness=0.3mm, resolution=0.3×0.3mm, reconstructed resolution=0.1×0.1mm, slices=50, averages=2, duration=7.5min, and a venous TOF with TR=50ms resulting in a duration of 9min with all other parameters maintained. The maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were used to visualize the abdominal aorta, the renal and iliac bifurcations, the vena cava and the region of flow obstruction corresponding to the thrombus (Supplementary Figure 2A&B). These images were used for planning the subsequent scans and for reference to guide the correlation between MRI images and histology. A late gadolinium enhancement inversion recovery 3D segmented gradient echo (TFE) sequence was performed to selectively visualise thrombus pre and post-contrast (late gadolinium enhancement fibrin selective magnetic resonance imaging: LGE-FSMRI). Slices (n=30) were acquired starting just above the renal veins and extending down to the union of the two common iliac veins (Supplementary Figure 2A&B). Imaging parameters included matrix size=448×448, acquired spatial resolution=100×100×500μm, TR/TE=27.4/8.2 ms, flip angle=30°, inversion time (TI)=450ms, and 2 signal averages. In addition, T1 mapping of thrombus and blood before and after contrast injection were performed using a Look-Locker based sequence that employs two non-selective inversion pulses with inversion times ranging from 20ms to 2000ms, followed by eight segmented readouts for eight individual images10. The two imaging trains result in a set of 16 images per slice with increasing inversion times. T1 and relaxation rate (R1 = 1/T1) maps from 20 slices were calculated using custom-made software implemented in Matlab (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA). T1 mapping imaging parameters included: acquired spatial resolution 200×200μm, slice thickness of 500μm, TR/TE=9.0/4.6ms and flip angle=10°. A phase contrast sequence was performed to measure blood flow in the infrarenal IVC pre and post thrombolysis (Supplementary Figure 2C&D) in order to evaluate the success of the thrombolytic therapy. Imaging parameters included spatial resolution=100×100μm, slice thickness=2mm, TR/TE=17.5/7.2ms, flip angle=30°, number of averages=6, and VENC=50cm/s.

Image Analysis

The visualised thrombus volume enhancement was calculated in the pre and post-contrast images. On LGE-FSMRI images, thrombus was defined as intravascular pixels with signal intensities greater than 2 standard deviations of the mean blood signal measured in normal vessel segments. On R1 maps thrombus size was estimated as intraluminal pixels with a R1 relaxation rate higher than the measured blood R1 in normal vessel segments plus two standard deviations. This criterion was used to estimate the thrombus volume and thrombus average R1 value. Blood R1 value was estimated in the pre-renal portion of the IVC. Phase contrast images were used to estimate blood flow in the IVC pre and 24hrs post thrombolytic therapy.

Thrombolysis was considered successful if an increase in IVC blood flow greater than 50% was observed on 24hrs post-lysis scans. We estimated the percentage of lysis (%Lysis) for each treated mouse, as the actual change in the IVC blood flow after treatment, compare with the maximum expected IVC blood flow change if 100% of the lumen were successfully cleared of thrombus, therefore:

A=IVC Blood flow prelysis [ml/min]

B=IVC Blood flow postlysis [ml/min]

C=Normal IVC Blood flow [ml/min]

%Lysis=BACA×100%

Histology

The length of the IVC, including the thrombus, from the renal branches down to the union of the two iliac veins was measured in situ and then was harvested en-bloc. The harvested IVC was pinned onto cork mats and stretched to its original length in vivo. The tissue was placed in 10% formalin for 24hrs before processing for impregnation and paraffin wax embedding. Individual animals (n=4/time-point) were analysed. Sections (5μm) of the entire IVC were taken at 500μm intervals. Renal and iliac veins were used as anatomical reference to allow comparison with the corresponding MRI slices. Sections were stained using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Martius Scarlet Blue (MSB) to provide morphological and compositional (fibrin) detail of the thrombus. Computer-assisted colour image analysis (Colour Threshold plug in, ImageJ, NIH, Bethesda, MD, US) was used to selective visualized the fibrin area on MSB-stained sections.

Analysis of fibrin content

Western blotting for fibrin was carried out using a fibrin-specific antibody (5F3 clone)11. Fibrin was extracted from thrombi by homogenisation in sodium phosphate buffer (10mmol/l, pH 7.5), with a cocktail of protease inhibitors that included, ε-amino-n-caproic acid (0.1mol/l), trisodium EDTA (5mmol/L), aprotinin (10U/ml), heparin (10U/ml), and polymethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, 2mmol/l). The homogenate was agitated for 14hrs at 4°C and sedimented by centrifugation at 10000g for 10mins. The sediment was resuspended in extraction buffer without PMSF, sedimented again, and dispersed in urea (3mol/l). The suspension was further agitated for 2hrs at 37°C, vigorously vortexed, and centrifuged at 14000g for 15mins. The supernatant was aspirated and the sediment dissolved at 65°C in reducing SDS buffer, subjected to SDS–polyacrylamide gel (8%) electrophoresis, followed by transfer to a polyvinylidine difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Immobilon-P; Millipore Corp) by electroblotting. Densitometiric values were obtained using Image Lab 4.1 software (Biorad, UK). Values were normalised to thrombus weight and values expressed relative to a mouse plasma clot.

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Gadolinium (Gd) concentrations were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) for a subset of thrombi (n=4/time-point). Thrombus was digested in 70% nitric acid at 37°C overnight followed by dilution with deionised water for ICP-MS analysis. A standard curve was run with each sample set for Gd concentration determination.

Statistical Analysis

Data was inserted into PRISM version 5 (GraphPad, USA) for analysis. Continuous data are expressed as mean±SEM. One-way ANOVA was used to measure changes between groups over time followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test. Paired Student’s t-test was used to compare pre and post contrast parameters in the same group of mice.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Significance.

Deep venous thrombosis is a major health problem. Our results show that the quantification of the fibrin-specific MRI contrast agent, EP-2104R, uptake changes during the resolution of an experimental venous thrombus. These changes strongly correlate with the fibrin content of the thrombus and uptake of the contrast agent can be used to identify thrombi that are susceptible to fibrinolysis. This approach has great potential to increasing the effectiveness of current venous thrombolytic therapy and decreasing the incidence of acute and chronic complications.

Acknowledgments

We thank David Eastham for his technical assistance and useful comments during the preparation of this article.

Sources of Funding: This study was partly supported by the British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence at King’s College London and Wellcome Trust, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Medical Engineering Centre at King’s College London (grant no. WT 088641/Z/09/Z), and the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre of Guy’s and St Thomas’ Trust and King’s College London. M.E. Andia was funded by the Chilean Agency for Research in Science and Technology (FONDECYT 1130379). P. Saha was funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Training Fellowship (WT 090252/Z/09/Z).

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

FSMRI

fibrin-specific MRI

IVC

inferior vena cava

Footnotes

Disclosures: None.

References

  • 1.Heit JA. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the community. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:370–372. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.162545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bates S, Ginsberg JS. Treatment Deep Vein Thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:268–277. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp031676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prandoni P, Bilora F, Marchiori A, Bernardi E, Petrobelli F, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Girolami A. An association between atherosclerosis and venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1435–1441. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kahn SR, Ginsberg JS. Relationship between deep venous thrombosis and the postthrombotic syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:17–26. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Frulla M, Marchiori A, Bernardi E, Tormene D, Mosena L, Pagnan A, Girolami A. Below-knee elastic compression stockings to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:249–256. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-4-200408170-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ., 3rd. Predictors of survival after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based, cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:445–453. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.5.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lensing A, Prandoni P, Prins M, Buller H. Deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1999;353:479–485. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04298-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schulman S, Lindmarker P, Holmström M, Lärfars G, Carlsson A, Nicol P, Svensson E, Ljungberg B, Viering S, Nordlander S, Leijd B, Jahed K, Hjorth M, Linder O, Beckman M. Post-thrombotic syndrome, recurrence, and death 10 years after the first episode of venous thromboembolism treated with warfarin for 6 weeks or 6 months. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:734–742. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01795.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Raju S, Neglen P. Chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2319–2327. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0802444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Enden T, Haig Y, Kløw NE, Slagsvold CE, Sandvik L, Ghanima W, Hafsahl G, Holme PA, Holmen LO, Njaastad AM, Sandbæk G, Sandset PM, CaVenT Study Group Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:31–38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61753-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Watson LI, Armon MP. Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;4:CD002783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002783.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patterson BO, Hinchliffe R, Loftus IM, Thompson MM, Holt PJ. Indications for catheter-directed thrombolysis in the management of acute proximal deep venous thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:669–674. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.200766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Popuri RK, Vedantham S. The role of thrombolysis in the clinical management of deep vein thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:479–484. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.213413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Comerota AJ. The ATTRACT Trial: rationale for early intervention for iliofemoral DVT. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2009;21:221–224. doi: 10.1177/1531003509359311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR, Meissner MH, Cynamon J, Labropoulos N, Haughton SH. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology. 1999;211:39–49. doi: 10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap4739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Klein SJ, Gasparis AP, Virvilis D, Ferretti JA, Labropoulos N. Prospective determination of candidates for thrombolysis in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:908–912. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, Goldhaber S, Raskob GE, Comerota AJ. American College of Chest Physicians. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest. 2008;133(6 Suppl):454S–545S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schweizer J, Kirch W, Koch R, Elix H, Hellner G, Forkmann L, Graf A. Short- and long-term results after thrombolytic treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1336–1343. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00863-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ali T, Humphries J, Burnand K, Sawyer B, Bursill C, Channon K, Greaves D, Rollins B, Charo IF, Smith A. Monocyte recruitment in venous thrombus resolution. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:601–608. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saha P, Humphries J, Modarai B, Mattock K, Waltham M, Evans CE, Ahmad A, Patel AS, Premaratne S, Lyons OT, Smith A. Leukocytes and the natural history of deep vein thrombosis: current concepts and future directions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:506–512. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.213405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Modarai B, Burnand KG, Humphries J, Waltham M, Smith A. The role of neovascularisation in the resolution of venous thrombus. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93:801–809. doi: 10.1160/TH04-09-0596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Modarai B, Burnand KG, Sawyer B, Smith A. Endothelial progenitor cells are recruited into resolving venous thrombi. Circulation. 2005;111:2645–2653. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.492678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Meissner MH, Zierler BK, Bergelin RO, Chandler WL, Strandness DE., Jr. Coagulation, fibrinolysis, and recanalization after acute deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:278–285. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wakefield TW, Myers DD, Henke PK. Mechanisms of venous thrombosis and resolution. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:387–391. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.162289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cesarman-Maus G, Hajjar KA. Molecular mechanisms of fibrinolysis. Br J Haematol. 2005;129:307–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mackman N. Triggers, targets and treatments for thrombosis. Nature. 2008;451:914–918. doi: 10.1038/nature06797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Overoye-Chan K, Koerner S, Looby RJ, Kolodziej AF, Zech SG, Deng Q, Chasse JM, McMurry TJ, Caravan P. EP-2104R: a fibrin-specific gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent for detection of thrombus. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:6025–6039. doi: 10.1021/ja800834y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Botnar RM, Perez AS, Witte S, Wiethoff AJ, Laredo J, Hamilton J, Quist W, Parsons EC, Jr, Vaidya A, Kolodziej A, Barrett JA, Graham PB, Weisskoff RM, Manning WJ, Johnstone MT. In vivo molecular imaging of acute and subacute thrombosis using a fibrin-binding magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Circulation. 2004;109:2023–2029. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127034.50006.C0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Katoh M, Wiethoff AJ, Parsons EC, Jr, Botnar RM, Weisskoff RM, Graham PB, Manning WJ, Günther RW. Molecular magnetic resonance imaging of coronary thrombosis and pulmonary emboli with a novel fibrin-targeted contrast agent. Circulation. 2005;111:1377–1382. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000158478.29668.9B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Katoh M, Haage P, Wiethoff AJ, Günther RW, Bücker A, Tacke J, Spuentrup E. Molecular magnetic resonance imaging of deep vein thrombosis using a fibrin-targeted contrast agent: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:146–150. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318195886d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vymazal J, Spuentrup E, Cardenas-Molina G, Wiethoff AJ, Hartmann MG, Caravan P, Parsons EC. Thrombus imaging with fibrin-specific gadolinium-based MR contrast agent EP2104R. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:697–704. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b092a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sirol M, Aguinaldo JGS, Graham PB, Weisskoff R, Lauffer R, Mizsei G, Chereshnev I, Fallon JT, Reis E, Fuster V, Toussaint J-F, Fayad ZA. Fibrin-targeted contrast agent for improvement of in vivo acute thrombus detection with MRI. Atherosclerosis. 2005;182:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Saha P, Andia ME, Modarai B, et al. Magnetic resonance T1-relaxation time of venous thrombus is determined by iron processing and predicts susceptibility to lysis. Circulation. 2013;128:729–736. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Spuentrup E, Botnar RM, Wiethoff AJ, Ibrahim T, Kelle S, Katoh M, Ozgun M, Nagel E, Vymazal J, Graham PB, Günther RW, Maintz D. MR imaging of thrombi using EP-2104R, a fibrin-specific contrast agent: initial results in patients. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1995–2005. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0965-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Supplementary References

  • 1.Singh I, Smith A, Vanzieleghem B, Collen D, Burnand K, Saint-Remy J-M, Jacquemin M. Antithrombotic effects of controlled inhibition of factor VIII with a partially inhibitory human monoclonal antibody in a murine vena cava thrombosis model. Blood. 2002;99:3235–40. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.9.3235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Singh I, Burnand KG, Collins M, Luttun A, Collen D, Boelhouwer B, Smith A. Failure of thrombus to resolve in urokinase-type plasminogen activator gene-knockout mice: rescue by normal bone marrow-derived cells. Circulation. 2003;107:869–75. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000050149.22928.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Modarai B, Burnand KG, Sawyer B, Smith A. Endothelial Progenitor Cells Are Recruited Into Resolving Venous Thrombi. Circulation. 2005;111:2645–2653. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.492678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Overoye-Chan K, Koerner S, Looby RJ, Kolodziej AF, Zech SG, Deng Q, Chasse JM, Mcmurry TJ, Caravan P. EP-2104R: A Fibrin-Specific Gadolinium-Based MRI Contrast Agent for Detection of Thrombus. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:6025–6039. doi: 10.1021/ja800834y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Botnar RM, Perez AS, Witte S, Wiethoff AJ, Laredo J, Hamilton J, Quist W, Parsons EC, Vaidya A, Kolodziej A, Barrett JA, Graham PB, Weisskoff RM, Manning WJ, Johnstone MT. In vivo molecular imaging of acute and subacute thrombosis using a fibrin-binding magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Circulation. 2004;109:2023–9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127034.50006.C0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Katoh M, Wiethoff AJ, Parsons EC, Botnar RM, Weisskoff RM, Graham PB, Manning WJ, Günther RW. Molecular magnetic resonance imaging of coronary thrombosis and pulmonary emboli with a novel fibrin-targeted contrast agent. Circulation. 2005;111:1377–82. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000158478.29668.9B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Botnar RM, Buecker A, Wiethoff AJ, Parsons EC, Katoh M, Katsimaglis G, Weisskoff RM, Lauffer RB, Graham PB, Gunther RW, Manning WJ, Spuentrup E. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of coronary thrombosis using a fibrin-binding molecular magnetic resonance contrast agent. Circulation. 2004;110:1463–6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134960.31304.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Katoh M, Haage P, Wiethoff AJ, Gunther RW, Bucker A, Tacke J, Spuentrup E. Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Deep Vein Thrombosis Using a Fibrin-Targeted Contrast Agent A Feasibility Study. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:146–150. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318195886d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vymazal J, Spuentrup E, Cardenas-Molina G, Wiethoff AJ, Hartmann MG, Caravan P, Parsons EC. Thrombus imaging with fibrin-specific Gadolinium-Based MR Contrast Agent EP2104R. Investigative Radiology. 2009;44:697–704. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b092a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Blume U, Orbell J, Waltham M, Smith A, Razavi R, Schaeffter T. 3D T 1-mapping for the characterization of deep vein thrombosis. Magn Reson Mater Phy. 2009;22:375–383. doi: 10.1007/s10334-009-0189-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Raut S, Gaffney PJ. Evaluation of the fibrin binding profile of two anti-fibrin monoclonal antibodies. Thromb Haemost. 1996;76:56–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

RESOURCES