Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2014 Jun 7;18(9):1785–1796. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12305

Expression of dual Nucleotides/Cysteinyl-Leukotrienes Receptor GPR17 in early trafficking of cardiac stromal cells after myocardial infarction

Simona Cosentino a,#, Laura Castiglioni b,#, Francesca Colazzo a,#, Elena Nobili a, Elena Tremoli b, Patrizia Rosa c, Maria P Abbracchio b,#, Luigi Sironi b,#, Maurizio Pesce d,#,*
PMCID: PMC4196654  PMID: 24909956

Abstract

GPR17 is a Gi-coupled dual receptor activated by uracil-nucleotides and cysteinyl-leukotrienes. These mediators are massively released into hypoxic tissues. In the normal heart, GPR17 expression has been reported. By contrast, its role in myocardial ischaemia has not yet been assessed. In the present report, the expression of GPR17 was investigated in mice before and at early stages after myocardial infarction by using immunofluorescence, flow cytometry and RT-PCR. Before induction of ischaemia, results indicated the presence of the receptor in a population of stromal cells expressing the stem-cell antigen-1 (Sca-1). At early stages after ligation of the coronary artery, the receptor was expressed in Sca-1+ cells, and cells stained with Isolectin-B4 and anti-CD45 antibody. GPR17+ cells also expressed mesenchymal marker CD44. GPR17 function was investigated in vitro in a Sca-1+/CD31 cell line derived from normal hearts. These experiments showed a migratory function of the receptor by treatment with UDP-glucose and leukotriene LTD4, two GPR17 pharmacological agonists. The GPR17 function was finally assessed in vivo by treating infarcted mice with Cangrelor, a pharmacological receptor antagonist, which, at least in part, inhibited early recruitment of GPR17+ and CD45+ cells. These findings suggest a regulation of heart-resident mesenchymal cells and blood-borne cellular species recruitment following myocardial infarction, orchestrated by GPR17.

Keywords: myocardial ischaemia, cardiac stromal cell, GPR17, Cysteinyl-Leukotrienes, myofibroblasts

Introduction

The early response to acute myocardial ischaemia (MI) is dominated by an innate immunity-related process that prevents ventricular rupture through rapid formation of a granulation tissue. This is thereafter replaced by a collagen-abundant scar [1]. During the inflammatory phase, the first trigger for recruitment of leucocytes into the infarcted area is represented by local release of pro-inflammatory mediators. Neutrophils and macrophages then clear the wound from dead cells and matrix debris, and produce cytokines/growth factors promoting myofibroblasts recruitment (MFs) [24]. The progressive substitution of the contractile myocardium with fibrocellular, Collagen-I enriched and un-contractile tissue results in heart functional alteration; this condition is called post-ischaemic heart failure [3].

Cellular damage associated with tissue hypoxia causes local and systemic release of extracellular nucleotides (e.g. ATP/ADP and Uracil-nucleotides UTP/UDP) and Cysteinyl-Leukotrienes (cys-LTs). Extracellular nucleotides have been classically involved in hypoxic cell death [5] or cardioprotection [6,7], whereas Cys-LTs, generated by 5-Lipoxygenase metabolism of Arachidonic acid, play important roles in priming inflammatory signalling in ischaemic tissues [811]. In this framework, the P2Y-like GPR17 receptor responds to these ligand families as a dual Gi-coupled receptor, it is expressed in organs susceptible to ischaemic damage such as the heart, the kidney and the brain [12,13] and it has been recently classified as an oligodendrocyte precursors receptor with a potential function in glial cell differentiation [14,15].

Prompted by a recent appraisal of purinergic signalling in paracrine activity of cardiac stromal cells [16] and lines of evidence showing a complex function of the GPR17 receptor in brain ischaemic damage, in the present contribution, we investigated the expression of the receptor in the mouse heart, before and after MI and partially assessed its function by in vitro and in vivo studies

Materials and methods

Experimental design of the animal model and ethical declaration

Experiments were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines, conformed to national and international law and policies (4D.L. N.116, G.U., supplement 40, 18-2-1992; EEC Council Directive 86/609, OJ L 358,1,12-12-1987; National Institutes of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and US National Research Council 1996). C57Bl/6N mice (Charles River Laboratories, Calco, Italy), aged 8 weeks (18–20 g bw), were fed ad libitum with standard chow/water, and randomly assigned to two groups: sham-operated mice and MI-mice. Surgery and sacrifices were performed under anaesthesia with intraperitoneal 75 mg/kg ketamine cloridrate and 1 mg/kg medetomidine.

In vivo myocardial infarction/pharmacological treatments

Mice were anaesthetized, intubated and ventilated with positive airway pressure. After thoracotomy, MI was induced by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) as previously reported [17]. Sham-operated mice underwent identical surgical procedure without LAD-ligation. Mice (five animals/group/time-point) were sacrificed at 24 and 48 hrs post-MI for morphological and immunofluorescence (IF) analyses. Further details about surgical procedures, MI quantification, pharmacological treatments, hearts collection and histological processing are provided in the online supplementary material.

Sca-1+ cell line derivation and high-throughput cell sorting from infarcted hearts

To derive the Sca-1+ line, normal hearts (five animals/group) were excised and immediately processed. Isolation was performed by using the Cardiac Stem Cells Isolation kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), according to Manufacturer's instruction. Following isolation, cells were maintained in cardiac Stem Cell Maintenance Medium (Millipore). For isolation of Sca-1+/CD45+/− cells, a flow cytometry-based sorting method was adopted. Briefly, myocardial tissue was digested to obtain a single cell suspension, then labelled with anti Sca-1 and anti CD45 antibodies and finally sorted by using a BD FACSAria II™ Flow-Sorter. Further details about derivation, differentiation and functional characterization of these cells are provided in the online Data S1.

Histology/Immunofluorescence

Left Ventricle Transversal sections of paraffin-embedded hearts (five animals/group/time-point) were de-waxed and re-hydrated with conventional ethanol series. Gross morphology of the LV wall was revealed by haematoxylin/eosin staining followed by image acquisition under an Axioskop light microscope (Zeiss Italia, Arese, Italy) equipped with a high-resolution digital camera. For IF imaging, de-waxed slides were treated for antigen retrieval, followed by incubation with blocking and primary/secondary antibodies solutions. Three/four fluorescence-stained slides were observed with an LSM710 Confocal Microscope (Zeiss). Further details about histology and IF methods are provided in the online Data S1.

RNA interference and cell transfection

Validated high-performance purity grade small interfering RNAs (siRNA) against GPR17 were synthesized by Thermo Scientific Dharmacon by using the Acell siRNA design algorithm and a proprietary homology analysis tool. Control siRNA, with a non-silencing oligonucleotide sequence that does not recognize any known homology to mammalian genes, was also generated as a negative control. Cells, at 70–80% confluence, were transfected with siRNA by using Accell delivery medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lafayette, CO, USA). After 24 hrs, the transfection procedure was stopped by cell collection to RNA extraction. Expression of GPR17 and functional analysis were performed as described in the online supplementary material.

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Overall comparisons of the treatment groups were performed by using one-way anova method with Newman Keuls post-hoc test. In case of one-to-one comparisons, two tailed unpaired Student's t-test was used. P values <0.05 value were considered statistically significant and indicated by * in the figures.

Results

GPR17 is expressed in stromal Sca1+ cells in normal harts, in Sca-1+/CD31 cells, and in recruited myeloid cells after MI

To localize cells expressing GPR17 in the mouse heart, an IF staining with an antibody directed against the GPR17 C-terminal region was set up. The specificity of this antibody to recognize GPR17 has been previously determined [18]. The GPR17 staining was initially used in combination with the cardiac marker α-Sarcomeric Actin (SA) to discriminate between myocytes and non-myocyte cells. The results (Fig. 1A) identified abundant interstitial cells expressing GPR17; these cells were found in all heart compartments without a confined expression. GPR17 antibody staining was then performed in combination with TRITC-conjugated Isolectin-B4 (Iso-B4), which specifically recognizes endothelial cells and macrophages [19,20] (Fig. 1B). This showed a clearly non-overlapping expression of GPR17 in Iso-B4+ cells, thus excluding endothelial or myeloid phenotypes of GPR17+ cells in the normoxic heart.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Expression of GPR17 in normal mouse hearts and after infarction. (A and B) Confocal microscopy images of normal mouse hearts histological sections stained with GPR17, α-Sarc Actin (SA) specific antibodies and TRITC-conjugated Isolectin-B4 (Iso-B4). GPR17 was observed exclusively in interstitial cells between the myocytes and were not associated with capillaries (c). Arrows indicate the endocardial cells (en) covering the ventricular cavity, which were also negative for GPR17 in non-ischaemic mice. (C and D) the number of GPR17+ cells was dramatically increased already at 24 hrs after MI in ischaemic areas. GPR17+ cells were also found arterial-like structures (ar, arrows) present in the ischaemic areas. Iso-B4 staining showed that after MI induction, a population expressing GPR17 and labelled with the Lectin appeared in the ischaemic areas (arrowheads). These cells were found in association with groups of cells expressing, alternatively, only one of the markers (arrows). (E) RT-PCR analysis of the total RNA extracted from sham (Sh)-operated versus infarcted (MI) mice showed no changes in GPR17 before and after MI. The 18s rRNA was used as an internal control.

To assess the expression of GPR17 in the ischaemic myocardium, a mouse model of MI by permanent ligation of the LAD coronary artery was used [17]. As shown in Figure S1, in this model, a burst of infiltrating cells appeared in the ischaemic areas as early as at 24 after ischaemia. At this time-point, the presence of GPR17+ cells was markedly increased, especially at the infarct border zone (Fig. 1C). Following infarction, a portion of GPR17+ cells also displayed reactivity with Iso-B4 (Fig. 1D), suggesting a macrophage phenotype. Finally, the expression of GPR17 was confirmed by RT-PCR in ischaemic versus normal hearts (Fig. 1E).

The presence of Adenosine receptor A2B has been recently reported in Sca-1+/CD31 cardiac cells, implying purinergic signalling in the regulation of these cells [16]. We therefore hypothesized that GPR17 may be expressed, before and after ischaemia, in stromal cells with mesenchymal characteristics [21]. To this aim, an IF analysis was performed to assess the expression of Sca-1 marker in GPR17+ cells. The results showed that before MI induction the vast majority of GPR17+ cells expressed Sca-1 (Fig. 2A). Because of their paucity, cells expressing Sca-1 in the non-ischaemic ventricular tissue could not be quantified. At 24 and 48 hrs after ischaemia, there was a dramatic increase in the number of cells expressing both markers (Fig. 2B, Fig. S2) and the appearance of GPR17+ cells, which did not express Sca-1. Irrespectively of Sca-1 expression, GPR17+ cells appeared located in groups apparently migrating just beneath the living myocardial cells. Membrane expression of GPR17 was confirmed by Z-stack reconstruction of confocal images (Fig. S3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

GPR17+ expression in Sca-1+ cells before and after MI. (A) Staining with SA, Sca-1 and GPR17 antibodies showed that GPR17+ interstitial cells in the normal heart express the Sca-1 marker (arrowheads). Only occasionally, cells expressing GPR17 were Sca-1. (B) The number of GPR17+/Sca-1+ cells (arrowheads) in the border zone of the infarct and in the ischaemic areas were elevated at 24 hrs after MI. Interestingly, the cells expressing, alternatively, only one of the markers were also increased (arrowheads), suggesting a heterogeneous origin. Dashed line indicates the boundary between the ischaemic and non-ischaemic zone.

The appearance in the ischaemic myocardium of GPR17+/Iso-B4+ (Fig. 1D) and GPR17+/Sca-1 (Fig. 2B and Fig. S2) cells suggested that the receptor characterizes also a circulating inflammatory cells population recruited at short time after infarction. To substantiate this finding, we performed a CD45/GPR17 staining. This indicated the presence of CD45 in groups of GPR17+ cells (Fig. 3A), particularly in those located below the endocardium layer (Fig. 3A). To quantify the presence of cells expressing GPR17 in conjunction with the other considered markers, a cell counting on tissue sections was finally performed (Fig. S4). This revealed the most abundant cells to be the GPR17+ followed by those Iso-B4+. By contrast, the Sca-1+ cells were the less abundant.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Expression of CD45 and CD44 in subgroups of GPR17+ cells. (A) Panels on the top left show low magnification of CD45 marker expression in GPR17+ (arrowheads) and GPR17 (arrows) cells. The four panels on the bottom left show that some cellular clusters had a mutually exclusive expression of the two markers (* for CD45+ and # for GPR17+ cells). The high magnification panels on the right show the presence of CD45+ cells homing events. These cells (*) adhered to the endocardium (en, arrows) covering ventricular cavity (VC); note that endocardial cells in ischaemic mice expressed the receptor. CD45+ cells expressed GPR17 only after invading the sub-endocardial tissue (arrowheads). The dashed line indicates the boundary between the ischaemic and non-ischaemic zone. (B) CD44+ cells infiltrating the myocardium were observed at 48 hrs post-MI both in the sub-endothelium and in the ischaemic myocardium. Cells expressing both markers (arrowheads) or, alternatively, one of the markers were observed. As shown in the upper right panel, round cells co-expressing GPR17 and CD44 were found associated with the endothelium of an arterial-like vessel (ar) in the ischaemic myocardium. Note the presence of endothelial cells expressing GPR17. VC; ventricular cavity.

To exclude that GPR17+ cells are endothelial cells recruited by ischaemia in the infarcted myocardium, a CD31 immunostaining was performed (Fig. 4). This showed the absence of GPR17 and CD31 co-expression in the infiltrating cells at the border zone of the ischaemic myocardium, although an immunoreactivity for the receptor was clearly found in the endothelium of arterial-like vessels (Figs 3B and 4). Taken together, these results suggest that distinct GPR17+/CD31 cellular populations, one deriving from cardiac stromal cells (neither expressing CD45 nor stained with Iso-B4), and another from blood-derived inflammatory cells (expressing CD45 and stained with Iso-B4), are concomitantly recruited in the ischaemic myocardium.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Absence of endothelial marker CD31 in GPR17+ cells invading the ischaemic myocardium. (A) a GPR17 immunoreactivity was observed in the endothelium (en, arrows) of arterial-like vessels present in the ischaemic border zone. (B and C) high-power views of the ischaemia border zone, showing that GPR17+ cells (arrowheads) did not show CD31 immunoreactivity. This excludes the endothelial phenotype of GPR17+ cells invading the myocardium after MI. c: capillaries; ar: arterial-like vessels.

Cardiac GPR17+/Sca-1+/CD31/CD45 cells represent a myo-fibroblast (MF) progenitor cell population in vivo and in vitro

To determine whether cells expressing GPR17 have cardiac stromal cells characteristics with the potential to differentiate into MF-like cells [22], co-staining with CD44 and Collagen-I was performed (Fig. 3B and Fig. S5). CD44 was present in a high proportion of GPR17+ cells, while only a non-quantifiable amount of these cells was found to co-express Collagen-I, suggesting an immature phenotype. This was confirmed by a time-course of MF-specific marker α-SMA (Fig. S6), which started being expressed in the scar only 1 week after infarction [23]. A flow-sorting strategy was then used to separate Sca-1+/CD45+ from Sca-1+/CD45 cells in the ischaemic heart (Fig. 5A). Flow-sorted cells were used for RNA extraction, or to assess differentiation in culture. Results indicated GPR17 expression in both sorted cellular populations (Fig. 5B). In addition, Sca-1+/CD45 cells spontaneously differentiated into MFs, as demonstrated by the presence of polymerized smooth muscle actin fibres (Fig. 5C), a hallmark of MFs [24]. As the number and the viability of sorted cells from the ischaemic hearts were not appropriate to perform functional studies, a cardiac Sca-1+/CD31 cell line was derived by clonal amplification as already described [21]. Figures S7 and S8, show the principal characteristics of these cells. Consistent with previous characterizations, this cell line expressed high levels of mesenchymal markers CD29, CD44 and CD105 [21], and displayed a relatively high percentage of cells extruding the nuclear marker Hoechst 33342 in a ‘side-population’ (SP) flow cytometric assay [25]. Sca-1+ cells did not express haematopoietic lineage markers and the tyrosine kinase receptor c-kit (CD117), the marker characterizing cardiac stem cells and other relevant myocardial-resident cells such as telocytes and stromal cells in mice [2631] and humans [3234] (data not shown). The expression of GPR17 in these cells was confirmed by IF, flow cytometry and RNA analyses.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Expression of GPR17 characterizes a MF progenitor cell population in the infarcted heart. (A) Flow cytometry plots showing the logical gating strategy adopted to identify and separate Sca-1+/CD45 from Sca-1+/CD45+ in myocyte-free mononuclear cell suspension obtained by enzymatic dissociation of infarcted hearts at 48 hrs post-MI. (B) Sca-1+/CD45+ and Sca-1+/CD45 cells were sorted and analysed by RT-PCR for the expression of GPR17. (C) Flow-sorted Sca-1+/CD45 cells underwent spontaneous differentiation into MF-like cells, as revealed by polymerization of αSMA fibres.

The function of the derived GPR17+/Sca-1+/CD31/CD45 cells as MF progenitors was assessed in differentiation assays by using a medium containing transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), a cytokine playing a pivotal role in activating MFs in the ischaemic heart [4]. Under MF differentiation conditions (Fig. 6), a substantial change in cellular morphology was observed, with an increase in cell size, the adoption of a fibroblast morphology and the development of smooth muscle actin containing stress fibres. Interestingly, treatment with TGF-β also potently inhibited cell proliferation, shown by a decrease in the amount of cells expressing the cell-cycle marker Ki67. Flow cytometry analysis showed that CD44 and GPR17 expression were maintained at high levels in TGF-β-treated cells, while αSMA was significantly up-regulated. Finally, the percentage of Collagen-I+ cells showed a clear trend to increase, although it did not reach statistical significance.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Cardiac GPR17+/Sca-1+/CD31/CD45 cells represent a myo-fibroblast (MF) progenitor cell population. (A) the GPR17+/Sca-1+/CD31/CD45 cell line obtained from normal hearts (Fig. S6 and S7) was treated with a differentiation medium (DM) containing TGF-β to induce MF differentiation. The treatment caused up-regulation of MF marker αSMA and, although not significantly, Collagen-I. The increase in αSMA expression was also confirmed by the analysis of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), as well as by western blotting. DDR2 expression remained low, while CD44 did not change. (B) Immunofluorescence with a Ki-67 antibody (upper panels) and αSMA and GPR17 antibodies (lower panels) in maintenance (MM) and differentiation (DM) media revealed that the stromal cell line acquired MF characteristics as characterized by formation of αSMA fibres. Differentiation occurred in concert with a reduction in KI-67+ cell number (arrowheads). By contrast, GPR17 was not down-regulated.

GPR17 agonists promote Sca-1+ cells migration in vitro

The previous results indicated that the clonal cell line could be used bona fide as a model to investigate GPR17 functions in cardiac stromal cells. Experiments in the presence of agonists such as UDP-Glucose (100 μM) and LTD4 (100 nM), known to activate the receptor, were then performed. While neither UDP-Glucose nor LTD4 caused significant changes on (i) cell cycle, (ii) hypoxia-induced apoptosis (data not shown) or (iii) TGF-β-induced cells differentiation, treatment with both agonists had a potent effect in migration assays (Fig. 7A). Interestingly, the migratory effect was inhibited by adding two GPR17 pharmacological antagonists, Cangrelor (10 μM) and Montelukast (1 μM). The direct role of GPR17 in Sca-1+ cells migratory activity was univocally confirmed by siRNA studies, which showed a reduction in the agonist-dependent cell motility in GPR17 knockout cells (Fig. 7B).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

GPR17 promotes migration of Sca-1+ cells in vitro and in vivo. (A) A transwell-based migration assay was used to assess the ability of GPR17 agonists LTD4 [L] and UDP-Glucose [U] (purity ≥97% for LTD4 and ≥98% for UDP-Gluc) to induce Sca-1+ cells migration. FBS was used as a positive control, while treatments with Montelukast [M] and Cangrelor [C] were used to revert the agonists effect on migration. * indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) in the migration level of Sca-1+ cells in the presence of FBS, LTD4 and UDP-Glucose versus cells treated with the GPR17 antagonists Montelukast and Cangrelor, or the combined agonist+antagonist treatment (L+M; U+C); data were compared by one-way anova with Newman-Keuls post-hoc analysis (n > 4). $ indicates significant differences in the migration level of Sca-1+ cells in the presence of FBS and GPR17 agonists (LTD4 and UDP-Glucose versus cells maintained in serum-free medium during migration (negative control). (B) Reduction of Sca-1+ cells migration in the presence of small interfering RNAs (siRNA) against GPR17. The RT-PCR on the left shows a reduction in GPR17 expression at 48 hrs after siRNA transfection. Graph on the right indicates the migration index of siRNA treated cells compared to controls. As shown, GPR17 down-regulation had an overall effect on Sca-1+ cells motility. On the other hand, receptor down-regulation abolished the migratory activity elicited by LTD4 treatment and reduced, although not significantly, the migration induced by UDP-Glucose. $ indicates a P < 0.05 significance level by paired t-test comparisons of migration observed in Control siRNA and GPR17-siRNA cells in the indicated conditions (n = 4). * indicates a P < 0.05 significance level by comparing migration observed in Control siRNA versus GPR17-siRNA in the indicated conditions using unpaired t-test (n = 4). (C and D) Immunofluorescence detection of GPR17, CD44 and CD45 expressing cells in sections of infarcted mice treated with saline (C) or Cangrelor (D). (E) In vivo recruitment of GPR17+ and CD45+, but not of CD44+ cells in vivo was reduced by Cangrelor treatment. Data in the bar graph are expressed as percentages of marker+ cells/total cell number. Images were acquired and analysed by a double-blind analysis procedure. * indicates P < 0.05 by unpaired t-test; n > 20 independent images on saline-injected (n = 3) or Cangrelor-injected (n = 3) infarcted hearts stained with GPR17/CD44 or GPR17/CD45 antibody mixture.

Reduced recruitment of GPR17+ and CD45+, but not of CD44+, cells in infarcted hearts treated with P2Y antagonist Cangrelor

Given the involvement of GPR17 in Sca-1+ cells motility in vitro, we tested whether receptor blockade by antagonists alters the early recruitment of cells expressing GPR17, MSC (CD44) or myeloid cells (CD45) markers in vivo. The experiment was performed by pre-treating mice with Cangrelor followed by direct drug injection into the infarct border zone. Mice were killed 24 hrs later and the hearts were processed for immunohistochemical detection of the selected markers (Fig. 7C and D). Cell counting on serial confocal microscope images of the ischaemic zone showed a reduced presence of infiltrating GPR17+ and CD45+ cells in drug-treated versus saline-injected mice. By contrast, the drug did not modify the presence of CD44+ cells (Fig. 7E).

Discussion

[9,11][3][35]The importance of Cys-LTs and purinergic signalling in MI is well established. Indeed, studies in the early '90s showed that blockade of leukotriene synthesis or antagonism of Cys-LT receptor alleviates the consequences of MI [9,11]. These data, supported by other findings using anti-inflammatory agents in animal MI models, have led to the hypothesis, never confirmed in clinical trials, that modulation of early inflammatory events might be a feasible way to control the extent of hypoxic ischemic damage (discussed in [3]). P2 receptors have been also proposed as potential therapeutic targets in the cardiac ischemia setting; in particular, the P2X-type receptors with their pleiotropic functions on cardiac cells ion permeability, or the P2Y-type receptors, which are coupled to Gq, Gs or Gi proteins and elicit activator or inhibitory actions on PLC or adenylate cyclase in a variety of cardiac cells [35].

GPR17: a receptor preferentially expressed in resident stromal cells before ischaemia, but shared in inflammatory cells and cardiac mesenchymal cells with MF progenitor characteristics after infarction

GPR17 is a P2Y-like receptor responding to either uracil-nucleotides and Cys-LTs whose presence characterizes various organs susceptible to ischaemic damage (e.g. brain, kidney and heart) [12]. Its peculiar pharmacological profile, initially unveiled in heterologous expressing systems, has been independently confirmed by some [36,37], but not other Authors [38]. These contrasting data may be as a result of dependence of the activity tests on the conditions adopted in recombinant ‘artificial’ systems, which potentially give rise to artefacts, especially in the case of constitutive GPR17 activation [39]. On the other hand, GPR17 responses have been more recently fully confirmed by us [18,40,41] and other authors [42] in cells that natively express the receptors, like oligodendroglia [15,18,42] and PC12 cells [40]. GPR17 has been also reported to act as a negative regulator of the Cys-LT1 receptor [36,38]. This suggests that, in addition to responding to cys-LTs, depending on specific pathophysiological conditions, GPR17 can interact with other closely related receptors.

GPR17 functions have been mostly addressed in the brain and the central nervous system, particularly in brain ischaemia or spinal cord injury models [13,4345]. Interestingly, it was found that in vivo modulation of GPR17 by pharmacological or genetic targeting improves the outcome of these injuries, suggesting a central role of the receptor in nervous tissue damage sensing, healing and repair [13,45]. By contrast, except for studies addressing the expression at transcriptional level [12], no further indication has been provided concerning the identity of cells expressing the receptor in the normal heart and, most importantly, whether GPR17 is modulated following induction of MI.

The first part of the present study was therefore designed to address this crucial point. We found that before MI induction, the most abundant cells expressing GPR17 were located in the interstitium between adjacent cardiac myocytes. These cells were distributed in the ventricular myocardium without a preferential location and were not grouped into cellular clusters resembling the typical cardiac stem cell ‘niches’ [46,47]. As the majority of cells expressing GPR17 in non-injured hearts displayed Sca-1 but not Iso-B4 Lectin staining (Figs 1A, B and 2A), we conclude that in normal conditions, the receptor characterizes a unique population of cardiac-resident stromal cells that does not display endothelial or myeloid characteristics. This establishes a striking similarity between the heart and the central nervous system, where GPR17+ cells may have a role of damage ‘sensor’ able to activate healing programmes [43].

After the induction of ischaemia, GPR17 was found in at least two distinct populations. The first is represented by Iso-B4+ or CD45+ myeloid cells, probably recruited from peripheral circulation to the ischaemic tissue (Figs 1C, D and 3A); the other, characterized by Sca-1 and negative for CD31, probably deriving from an intra-cardiac stromal cells store (Fig. 4). This hypothesis is supported by the previous observations that myocardial infarction determines an increase in the amount of Sca-1+/CD31 cells [48], and recruitment of a multipotent cardiac MSC population which contributes to cardiac fibrosis [22]. Particularly interesting appeared, in this respect, also the expression of CD44 in GPR17+ cells in the infarct tissue (Fig. 3B) and the lack of mature MF marker αSMA at early times after MI, suggesting an immature phenotype. In fact, expression of CD44, in the presence or the absence of CD45, was the principal criterion to discriminate between inflammatory cells homing in the infarcted myocardium from peripheral circulation and stromal progenitors recruited from heart-resident pools [22]. For technical reasons (need of performing indirect GPR17 staining of living cells in conjunction with multicolour membrane marker analysis), it was not possible to proceed with a direct flow-sorting experiment of GPR17+/Sca-1+/CD44+/CD31/CD45 cells from infarcted hearts to resolve the cardiac MSC phenotype and the MF differentiation potency of the GPR17+ expressing cells in the infarct. On the other hand, the finding that Sca-1+/CD45 cells sorted from infarcted mice (Fig. 5) and that GPR17+/Sca-1+/CD31/CD45 cells cloned from the normal hearts (Fig. 6) expressed high levels of CD44 and were induced by TGF-β treatment to differentiate into cells with enhanced expression and intracellular polymerization of αSMA protein, strongly suggest the identity of the observed GPR17+/CD44+ cells in the ischaemic myocardium (Fig. 3B) as heart-resident MSCs, endowed with MF differentiation potency. This latter conclusion is also supported by the absence of c-kit, a marker typical of cardiac-resident stem cells in mice and humans [26,32] and of other stromal cells such as telocytes [28,30].

Possible function of GPR17 in cardiac-resident MF progenitors

Cys-LTs and purines are well-established initiators of the inflammatory responses. Their role is that of a ‘find-me signal’ attracting the phagocytes to sites of apoptotic cells clearance [49] and inducing a chemokine ‘milieu’ necessary for sequential chemo-attractant cascades involved in pro- inflammatory phases associated with tissue damage, innate host-defence, and autoimmunity [50]. Prompted by our preliminary investigations showing that blockade of Cys-LTs signalling alleviates the extent of hypoxic stress-related cardiac fibrosis [51], and other reports suggesting the relevance of Adenosine signalling in the protective function of cardiac stromal cells [16], we determined the function of GPR17 in the cloned cardiac Sca-1+/CD31 line. While the treatment of the cells with known Cys-LT/purinergic agonists (LTD4 and UDP-gluc) in vitro did not have an effect on proliferation and hypoxia-induced apoptosis (data not shown), both ligands exerted a potent chemotactic effect via GPR17 activation. This was shown by reversion of the migratory effect by co-treatment with known GPR17 pharmacological antagonists such as Montelukast and Cangrelor, as well as by a more specific siRNA knockout approach (Fig. 7). In our experiments, we also investigated whether treatment with the two ligands determined modifications in the TGF-β-induced MF differentiation programme. However, we did not observe remarkable differences (data not shown). Altogether, these findings point to a specific GPR17 role in chemotactic guidance of stromal cells towards the ischaemic sites.

A preliminary assessment of a possible in vivo GPR17 function was provided by treating infarcted mice with systemic and intra-myocardial injection of the GPR17 antagonist Cangrelor, followed by analysis of the principal cell types recruited in the forming scar (Fig. 7). The blockade of purinergic signalling transmission by Cangrelor led to an interesting and unexpected imbalance between the amount of the recruited cells in control versus treated mice. In fact, Cangrelor treatment determined a significant reduction in the number of GPR17+ cells and myeloid cells, characterized by CD45 expression, but not that of CD44+ cells (Fig. 7). As Cangrelor targets the purinergic, but not the Cys-LT GPR17 signal transduction pathway, this suggests the existence of redundant mechanisms, possibly linked to the dual receptor GPR17 nature. Alternatively, an antagonistic function of GPR17 signalling in distinct stromal and myeloid cells may justify the observed imbalance between cardiac-derived versus blood-derived infiltrating cells.

In summary, our results suggest a potential role of the Purinergic and Cys-LT GPR17 receptor in the early response of cardiac stromal cells to ischaemia. This is in agreement with a very recent study showing the involvement of the Adenosine A2B receptor in cardioprotection by Sca-1+ stromal cells [52]. Whether selective modulation of GPR17 signalling in cardiac-resident stromal cells translates into beneficial treatments to reduce the extent of myocardial fibrosis and to limit the functional consequences of heart ischaemia is still a matter of speculation, and it is the subject of our current analyses.

Acknowledgments

The present work was financed by Institutional Funding (Ricerca Corrente) at Centro Cardiologico Monzino and partially supported by Cariplo Foundation (ref. 2012 0546 to PR and LS).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article:

Figure S1. Left ventricle transversal sections showing the infract region at 24 and 48 hrs after ligation of the coronary artery.

Figure S2. Evaluation of GPR17+ and Sca-1+ cell populations at 48 hrs after MI by immunofluorescence analysis of transversal sections (see Fig. S1 for sections orientation) of the ischaemic LV zones.

Figure S3. Z-stack confocal image of the ischaemic myocardium 24 hrs after ischaemia.

Figure S4. Counting of cells single positive (A) or double/triple positive (B) cells for the indicated markers, after staining with multicolour immunofluorescence and confocal analysis.

Figure S5. GPR17+/CD44+ cells invading the infracted myocardium do not express mature MF marker Collagen-I.

Figure S6. Immunofluorescence showing expression of GPR17 in conjunction with mature myofibroblasts marker αSMA in the ischaemic myocardium at 48 hrs (48h; upper panels) and 1 week (1W; lower panels) after MI.

Figure S7. Phenotypic characterization of Sca-1+ cell line.

Figure S8. Stability of the Sca-1+ cells line and quantification of mesenchymal marker expression.

Data S1. Detailed materials and methods.

jcmm0018-1785-SD1.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Pesce M, Pompilio G, Gambini E. Cardiac stem cells: tales, mysteries and promises in heart generation and regeneration. In: Steinhoff G, et al., editors. The Netherlands: Springer; 2011. pp. 265–86. Regenerative Medicine: from protocol to patient. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Frangogiannis NG. The immune system and cardiac repair. Pharmacol Res. 2008;58:88–111. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frangogiannis NG. Regulation of the inflammatory response in cardiac repair. Circ Res. 2012;110:159–73. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.243162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weber KT, Sun Y, Bhattacharya SK, et al. Myofibroblast-mediated mechanisms of pathological remodelling of the heart. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013;10:15–26. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cosentino S, Banfi C, Burbiel JC, et al. Cardiomyocyte death induced by ischaemic/hypoxic stress is differentially affected by distinct purinergic P2 receptors. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16:1074–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01382.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wee S, Peart JN, Headrick JP. P2 purinoceptor-mediated cardioprotection in ischemic-reperfused mouse heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;323:861–7. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.125815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cohen R, Shainberg A, Hochhauser E, et al. UTP reduces infarct size and improves mice heart function after myocardial infarct via P2Y2 receptor. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:1126–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.07.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bäck M. Leukotriene signaling in atherosclerosis and ischemia. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2009;23:41–8. doi: 10.1007/s10557-008-6140-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hock CE, Beck LD, Papa LA. Peptide leukotriene receptor antagonism in myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 1992;26:1206–11. doi: 10.1093/cvr/26.12.1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peters-Golden M, Henderson WR. Leukotrienes. New Engl J Med. 2007;357:1841–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rossoni G, Sala A, Berti F, et al. Myocardial protection by the leukotriene synthesis inhibitor BAY X1005: importance of transcellular biosynthesis of cysteinyl-leukotrienes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;276:335–41. doi: 10.1163/2211730x96x00180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ciana P, Fumagalli M, Trincavelli ML, et al. The orphan receptor GPR17 identified as a new dual uracil nucleotides/cysteinyl-leukotrienes receptor. EMBO J. 2006;25:4615–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lecca D, Trincavelli ML, Gelosa P, et al. The recently identified P2Y-like receptor GPR17 is a sensor of brain damage and a new target for brain repair. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Boda E, Viganò F, Rosa P, et al. The GPR17 receptor in NG2 expressing cells: focus on in vivo cell maturation and participation in acute trauma and chronic damage. Glia. 2011;59:1958–73. doi: 10.1002/glia.21237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fumagalli M, Lecca D, Abbracchio MP. Role of purinergic signalling in neuro-immune cells and adult neural progenitors. Front Biosci. 2011;16:2326–41. doi: 10.2741/3856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ryzhov S, Goldstein AE, Novitskiy SV, et al. Role of A2B adenosine receptors in regulation of paracrine functions of stem cell antigen 1-positive cardiac stromal cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;341:764–74. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.190835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Franzosi M, Guerrini U, Castiglioni L, et al. Feasibility of quantitative analysis of regional left ventricular function in the post-infarct mouse by magnetic resonance imaging with retrospective gating. Comput Biol Med. 2011;41:829–37. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fratangeli A, Parmigiani E, Fumagalli M, et al. The regulated expression, intracellular trafficking, and membrane recycling of the P2Y-like receptor GPR17 in Oli-neu oligodendroglial cells. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:5241–56. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.404996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Laitinen L. Griffonia simplicifolia lectins bind specifically to endothelial cells and some epithelial cells in mouse tissues. Histochem J. 1987;19:225–34. doi: 10.1007/BF01680633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sorokin SP, Hoyt RF., Jr Macrophage development: I. Rationale for using Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin B4 as a marker for the line. Anat Rec. 1992;232:520–6. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092320409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Matsuura K, Honda A, Nagai T, et al. Transplantation of cardiac progenitor cells ameliorates cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2204–17. doi: 10.1172/JCI37456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Carlson S, Trial J, Soeller C, et al. Cardiac mesenchymal stem cells contribute to scar formation after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;91:99–107. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Burba I, Colombo GI, Staszewsky LI, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibition enhances self renewal and cardioprotection by human cord blood-derived CD34 cells. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e22158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tojkander S, Gateva G, Lappalainen P. Actin stress fibers – assembly, dynamics and biological roles. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:1855–64. doi: 10.1242/jcs.098087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oyama T, Nagai T, Wada H, et al. Cardiac side population cells have a potential to migrate and differentiate into cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2007;176:329–41. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200603014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, et al. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003;114:763–76. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00687-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dey D, Han L, Bauer M, et al. Dissecting the molecular relationship among various cardiogenic progenitor cells. Circ Res. 2013;112:1253–62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.300779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bani D, Nistri S. New insights into the morphogenic role of stromal cells and their relevance for regenerative medicine. lessons from the heart. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:363–70. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhao B, Chen S, Liu J, et al. Cardiac telocytes were decreased during myocardial infarction and their therapeutic effects for ischaemic heart in rat. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:123–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01655.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Manole CG, Cismasiu V, Gherghiceanu M, et al. Experimental acute myocardial infarction: telocytes involvement in neo-angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:2284–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01449.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Diaz-Flores L, Gutierrez R, Garcia MP, et al. CD34+ stromal cells/fibroblasts/fibrocytes/telocytes as a tissue reserve and a principal source of mesenchymal cells. Location, morphology, function and role in pathology. Histol Histopathol. 2014 doi: 10.14670/HH-29.831. (in press) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bearzi C, Rota M, Hosoda T, et al. Human cardiac stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:14068–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706760104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gambini E, Pesce M, Persico L, et al. Patient profile modulates cardiac c-kit+ progenitor cell availability and amplification potential. Transl Res. 2012;160:363–73. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gambini E, Pompilio G, Biondi A, et al. C-kit+ cardiac progenitors exhibit mesenchymal markers and preferential cardiovascular commitment. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89:362–73. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yang R, Liang BT. Cardiac P2X4 receptors. Circ Res. 2012;111:397–401. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.265959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Benned-Jensen T, Rosenkilde MM. Distinct expression and ligand-binding profiles of two constitutively active GPR17 splice variants. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;159:1092–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00633.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Buccioni M, Marucci G, Dal Ben D, et al. Innovative functional cAMP assay for studying G protein-coupled receptors: application to the pharmacological characterization of GPR17. Purinergic Signal. 2011;7:463–8. doi: 10.1007/s11302-011-9245-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Qi AD, Harden TK, Nicholas RA. Is GPR17 a P2Y/leukotriene receptor? examination of uracil nucleotides, nucleotide sugars, and cysteinyl leukotrienes as agonists of GPR17. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013;347:38–46. doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.207647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kenakin T. Inverse, protean, and ligand-selective agonism: matters of receptor conformation. FASEB J. 2001;15:598–611. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0438rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Daniele S, Lecca D, Trincavelli ML, et al. Regulation of PC12 cell survival and differentiation by the new P2Y-like receptor GPR17. Cell Signal. 2010;22:697–706. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fumagalli M, Daniele S, Lecca D, et al. Phenotypic changes, signaling pathway, and functional correlates of GPR17-expressing neural precursor cells during oligodendrocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:10593–604. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.162867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dougherty JD, Fomchenko EI, Akuffo AA, et al. Candidate pathways for promoting differentiation or quiescence of oligodendrocyte progenitor-like cells in glioma. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4856–68. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ceruti S, Villa G, Genovese T, et al. The P2Y-like receptor GPR17 as a sensor of damage and a new potential target in spinal cord injury. Brain. 2009;132:2206–18. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen Y, Wu H, Wang S, et al. The oligodendrocyte-specific G protein-coupled receptor GPR17 is a cell-intrinsic timer of myelination. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1398–406. doi: 10.1038/nn.2410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhao B, Zhao CZ, Zhang XY, et al. The new P2Y-like receptor G protein-coupled receptor 17 mediates acute neuronal injury and late microgliosis after focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Neuroscience. 2012;202:42–57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.11.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Urbanek K, Cesselli D, Rota M, et al. Stem cell niches in the adult mouse heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9226–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600635103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hosoda T, D'Amario D, Cabral-Da-Silva MC, et al. Clonality of mouse and human cardiomyogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:17169–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903089106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang X, Hu Q, Nakamura Y, et al. The role of the Sca-1+/CD31− cardiac progenitor cell population in postinfarction left ventricular remodeling. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1779–88. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Elliott MR, Chekeni FB, Trampont PC, et al. Nucleotides released by apoptotic cells act as a find-me signal to promote phagocytic clearance. Nature. 2009;461:282–6. doi: 10.1038/nature08296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sadik CD, Luster AD. Lipid-cytokine-chemokine cascades orchestrate leukocyte recruitment in inflammation. Journal Leuk Biol. 2012;91:207–15. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0811402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nobili E, Salvado MD, Folkersen L, et al. Cysteinyl leukotriene signaling aggravates myocardial hypoxia in experimental atherosclerotic heart disease. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e41786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ryzhov S, Zhang Q, Biaggioni I, et al. Adenosine A2B receptors on cardiac stem cell antigen (Sca)-1-positive stromal cells play a protective role in myocardial infarction. Am J Pathol. 2013;183:665–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Left ventricle transversal sections showing the infract region at 24 and 48 hrs after ligation of the coronary artery.

Figure S2. Evaluation of GPR17+ and Sca-1+ cell populations at 48 hrs after MI by immunofluorescence analysis of transversal sections (see Fig. S1 for sections orientation) of the ischaemic LV zones.

Figure S3. Z-stack confocal image of the ischaemic myocardium 24 hrs after ischaemia.

Figure S4. Counting of cells single positive (A) or double/triple positive (B) cells for the indicated markers, after staining with multicolour immunofluorescence and confocal analysis.

Figure S5. GPR17+/CD44+ cells invading the infracted myocardium do not express mature MF marker Collagen-I.

Figure S6. Immunofluorescence showing expression of GPR17 in conjunction with mature myofibroblasts marker αSMA in the ischaemic myocardium at 48 hrs (48h; upper panels) and 1 week (1W; lower panels) after MI.

Figure S7. Phenotypic characterization of Sca-1+ cell line.

Figure S8. Stability of the Sca-1+ cells line and quantification of mesenchymal marker expression.

Data S1. Detailed materials and methods.

jcmm0018-1785-SD1.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES