Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 2014 Oct;60(10):905–906.

Safety of tacrolimus in pregnancy

Sécurité du tacrolimus durant la grossesse

Will Nevers, Anna Pupco, Gideon Koren, Pina Bozzo
PMCID: PMC4196812  PMID: 25316742

Abstract

Question I have a 30-year-old patient who had a kidney transplant 2 years ago. She is now planning a pregnancy. She has been treated with tacrolimus since her transplant. Will it be safe for the fetus if she continues to take it during the pregnancy or should she switch to a different antirejection medication?

Answer If your patient is stable while taking tacrolimus, there is no reason to switch. The current available information does not suggest that tacrolimus increases the risk of major congenital malformations above the baseline risk in the general population. Premature birth and low birth weight are often reported in this population; however, these effects are frequently reported in pregnant transplant patients treated with other immunosuppressant agents and probably reflect the effects of the maternal condition. As there are some reports of hyperkalemia and renal impairment in infants exposed to tacrolimus in utero, kidney function and electrolytes should be monitored in exposed neonates.


In 2012 there were 2287 solid-organ transplants performed in Canada. By the end of 2012 there were 6593 women living in Canada with functioning transplanted kidneys1; approximately 22% of them were 20 to 44 years old. Thus, a substantial number of recipients are women of childbearing age. As all transplant recipients require immunosuppressant therapy, and as tacrolimus is a widely used immunosuppressant (for transplant recipients and for patients with certain autoimmune conditions), more and more fetuses are exposed to it.

Pharmacokinetics

Tacrolimus is highly bound to plasma proteins (albumin) and erythrocytes (orosomucoid and hemoglobin), which are present in lower levels during pregnancy, resulting in potential changes in tacrolimus concentrations. However, if no change in unbound intrinsic clearance of tacrolimus is seen, this decrease would lead to a fall in whole blood concentration, but no change in the unbound concentration. In clinical practice, trough tacrolimus concentrations are measured in whole blood; thus, dose titration during pregnancy to keep the trough concentrations in the therapeutic range might lead to an increase in the unbound concentrations, resulting in toxicity. Monitoring of tacrolimus levels in pregnant patients with anemia and hypoalbuminemia using plasma or unbound trough concentrations might better predict drug efficacy than whole blood concentrations do. If whole blood concentrations are the only assay available, red blood cell count and serum albumin concentration should be taken into account when considering dose titration.2,3

Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes

Tacrolimus has been shown to cross the placenta into the fetal circulation in humans.4

There have been reports of case series of human pregnancies with tacrolimus exposure (approximately 200 pregnancies) in post-transplant patients. Most authors reported favourable pregnancy outcomes, with no evidence of increased risk of congenital malformations. However, all authors report higher rates of preterm delivery and low birth weight. There are also several reports of transient neonatal hyperkalemia and renal dysfunction, which resolve in infancy without further adverse effects.510

In 2012, the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR) reported data on fetuses exposed to tacrolimus in pregnant recipients of kidney (n = 334), liver (n = 180), pancreas-kidney (n = 50), heart (n = 45), and small-bowel (n = 2) transplants. The outcomes reported were spontaneous abortion rates of 22% to 33%, stillbirth rates of 0% to 2%, live birth rates of 65% to 74%, premature birth rates of 43% to 72%, mean gestational age of about 34 to 36 weeks, and low birth weight rates of 29% to 53%.11 The report is available on request from the NTPR (www.ntpr.giftoflifeinstitute.org). Although no comparisons have been made, these values seem to be within ranges reported in transplant patients regardless of treatment received.12,13

A study comparing pregnancy outcomes of 23 kidney recipients (29 pregnancies) taking different immunosuppressive therapies reported no statistical difference in perinatal or maternal complications and graft survival rates (11 taking cyclosporine, 9 taking tacrolimus, 1 taking mycophenolate mofetil, and 12 taking azathioprine). Of the 29 pregnancies, 26 resulted in live births, 2 in stillbirths, and 1 in a miscarriage. The median birth weight of the newborns was 2650 g (range 900 to 4350 g). Perinatal complications were reported in 58.6% of the pregnancies, with premature birth being the most common (35.7%). No major congenital malformations were reported in the 9 infants born to women taking tacrolimus.14

A 2008 abstract based on data from the NTPR reported 3 infants (4.2%) with birth defects among 102 pregnancies in kidney transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus (without mycophenolate mofetil) during pregnancy. No difference in the incidence of birth defects was reported among liver, pancreas-kidney, and heart recipients. However, an increase in incidence of birth defects was reported in the fetuses of kidney recipients exposed to tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil, which probably reflects the known teratogenicity of mycophenolate mofetil.15

Conclusion

The current available data do not suggest an increased risk of major congenital malformations following in utero exposure to tacrolimus. An increased risk of low birth weight and preterm birth was reported; however, it is probably related to the maternal condition and not to the medication. Owing to reports of hyperkalemia and renal impairment in exposed infants, renal function and potassium levels should be monitored in such newborns.

As all transplant recipients require immunosuppressant therapy, based on the above data tacrolimus can be considered a viable option during pregnancy.

MOTHERISK

Motherisk questions are prepared by the Motherisk Team at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ont. Dr Nevers is a graduate of the doctoral program in the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Toronto. Dr Pupco is a member, Dr Koren is Director, and Ms Bozzo is Assistant Director of the Motherisk Program. Dr Koren is supported by the Research Leadership for Better Pharmacotherapy during Pregnancy and Lactation.

Do you have questions about the effects of drugs, chemicals, radiation, or infections in women who are pregnant or breastfeeding? We invite you to submit them to the Motherisk Program by fax at 416 813-7562; they will be addressed in future Motherisk Updates. Published Motherisk Updates are available on the Canadian Family Physician website (www.cfp.ca) and also on the Motherisk website (www.motherisk.org).

Footnotes

Competing interests

None declared

References

  • 1.Canadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Organ Replacement Register annual report: treatment of end-stage organ failure in Canada, 2003 to 2012. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zheng S, Easterling TR, Umans JG, Miodovnik M, Calamia JC, Thummel KE, et al. Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus during pregnancy. Ther Drug Monit. 2012;34(6):660–70. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3182708edf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hebert MF, Zheng S, Hays K, Shen DD, Davis CL, Umans JG, et al. Interpreting tacrolimus concentrations during pregnancy and postpartum. Transplantation. 2013;95(7):908–15. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318278d367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zheng S, Easterling TR, Hays K, Umans JG, Miodovnik M, Clark S, et al. Tacrolimus placental transfer at delivery and neonatal exposure through breast milk. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76(6):988–96. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12122. Epub 2013 Nov 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jain A, Venkataramanan R, Fung JJ, Gartner JC, Lever J, Balan V, et al. Pregnancy after liver transplantation under tacrolimus. Transplantation. 1997;64(4):559–65. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199708270-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kainz A, Harabacz I, Cowlrick IS, Gadgil SD, Hagiwara D. Review of the course and outcome of 100 pregnancies in 84 women treated with tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2000;70(12):1718–21. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200012270-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jain AB, Reyes J, Marcos A, Mazariegos G, Eghtesad B, Fontes PA, et al. Pregnancy after liver transplantation with tacrolimus immunosuppression: a single center’s experience update at 13 years. Transplantation. 2003;76(5):827–32. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000084823.89528.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jain AB, Shapira R, Scantlebury VP, Potdar S, Jordan ML, Flohr J, et al. Pregnancy after kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation under tacrolimus: a single center’s experience. Transplantation. 2004;77(6):897–902. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000117564.50117.fb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Christopher V, Al-Chalabi T, Richardson PD, Muiesan P, Rela M, Heaton ND, et al. Pregnancy outcome after liver transplantation: a single-center experience of 71 pregnancies in 45 recipients. Liver Transpl. 2006;12(7):1138–43. doi: 10.1002/lt.20810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jabiry-Zieniewicz Z, Kamiński P, Pietrzak B, Cyganek A, Bobrowska K, Ziółkowski J, et al. Outcome of four high-risk pregnancies in female liver transplant recipients on tacrolimus immunosuppression. Transplant Proc. 2006;38(1):255–7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.12.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry. 2012 annual report. Philadelphia, PA: Gift of Life Institute; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gill JS, Zalunardo N, Rose C, Tonelli M. The pregnancy rate and live birth rate in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(7):1541–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02662.x. Epub 2009 May 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sibanda N, Briggs JD, Davison JM, Johnson RJ, Rudge CJ. Pregnancy after organ transplantation: a report from the UK Transplant pregnancy registry. Transplantation. 2007;83(10):1301–7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000263357.44975.d0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Perales-Puchalt A, Vila Vives JM, López Montes J, Diago Almela VJ, Perales A. Pregnancy outcomes after kidney transplantation-immunosuppressive therapy comparison. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(8):1363–6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.634461. Epub 2011 Nov 25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sifontis NM, Coscia LA, Schiraldi M, Constantinescu S, Moritz MJ, Armenti VT. Structural birth defects in the newborn of solid organ transplant recipients [abstract 1693] Am J Transplant. 2008;8(Suppl s2):628. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES