Skip to main content
Lippincott Open Access logoLink to Lippincott Open Access
letter
. 2013 Mar 15;51(4):374. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182836de8

The Bayesian Model on Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Italy Lacks Transparency

Livio Garattini 1, Katelijne van de Vooren 1
PMCID: PMC4196844  PMID: 23358389

To the Editor:

We refer to a recently published article1 that shows a new Bayesian method, applied to assess a vaccination strategy preventing human papillomavirus (HPV)-related diseases. The article basically describes a model for the economic evaluation of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine in Italy, concluding that it is a cost-effective strategy. Although any model, Bayesian or Frequentist, should be “populated” with reliable data,2 we felt some concern about many “inputs” regarding the Italian setting that could weaken the authors’ conclusions. We have listed some of the main ones.

  • Real data on Italian vaccination coverage are referenced by an abstract,3 without specifying that this refers to a very small region in Italy (Basilicata, 0.97% of the whole Italian population). Thereafter, table 1 refers for vaccination compliance and coverage to another article, published in Italian, focussed on the efficacy of the quadrivalent vaccine.4

  • Data on health states associated with HPV-related diseases refer to another abstract,5 then unspecified Italian utility weights for health states were applied, but to our knowledge, no utility tariffs have been validated so far in Italy.

  • Utilities of cervical cancer, genital and cervical lesions, all refer to an article on the costs of varicella-related hospitalizations in table 1.6

  • The vaccine price is not consistent with published data,7 and we could not find the figure used as a mean (€69.13, see table 1) in the references.8,9

More in general, the authors state that the cost-effectiveness of the quadrivalent vaccine is proven, ignoring the other, bivalent vaccine against HPV. As 3 recent critical reviews1012 on economic evaluations regarding HPV vaccines—not cited in the article—concluded that long-term models on HPV vaccination lack transparency in key assumptions and methodological choices, we wonder whether the results of this model (producing a “virtual” follow-up of 90 y) can really be considered more reliable than the others already published.

Livio Garattini, PhD

Katelijne van de Vooren
CESAV, Center for Health Economics, “Mario Negri” Institute for Pharmacological Research, Ranica, Italy

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Favato G, Baio G, Capone A, et al. Novel health economic evaluation of a vaccination strategy to prevent HPV-related diseases: the BEST Study. Med Care. 2012;50:1076–1085. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318269e06d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weinstein MC, O’Brien B, Hornberger J, et al. ISPOR Task Force on good research practices—modeling studies. Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices—modeling studies. Value Health. 2003;6:9–17. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.00234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mennini FS, Baio G, Montagano G, et al. Governance of preventive health intervention and on time verification of its efficiency in a region of southern Italy. Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) society, 7th annual meeting. Dublin, Ireland, 6th-9th June 2010. Abstract M5-18 176–177.
  • 4.La Torre G, Chiaradia G, de Waure C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on the efficacy of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine. HTA reports of quadrivalent anti-HPV vaccine, Gardasil. Ital J Public Health. 2009;2(suppl 2):S25–S32. [Italian] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mennini FS, Panatto D, Cristoforoni P, et al. The time-trade off approach to measure patients’ preferences for health states associated with HPV-related pathologies: a multicenter study performed in Italy. Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) society, 7th annual meeting. Dublin, Ireland, 6th-9th June 2010. Abstract M5-53; p. 192.
  • 6.Azzari C, Massai C, Poggiolesi C, et al. Cost of varicella-related hospitalizations in an Italian paediatric hospital: comparison with possible vaccination expenses. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:2945–2954. doi: 10.1185/030079907X242610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garattini L, Van de Vooren K, Curto A. Pricing human papillomavirus vaccines: lessons from Italy. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30:213–217. doi: 10.2165/11596560-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mennini FS, Giorgi Rossi P, Palazzo F, et al. Health and economic impact associated with a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in Italy. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112:370–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ferrandina G, Marcellusi A, Mennini FS, et al. Hospital costs incurred by the Italian National Health Service for invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119:243–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Koleva D, De Compadri P, Padula A, et al. Economic evaluation of human papilloma virus vaccination in the European Union: a critical review. Intern Emerg Med. 2011;6:163–174. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0529-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Newal AT, Beutels P, Wood JG, et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of human papillomavirus vaccination. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:289–296. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70083-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Puig-Junoy J, Lopez-Valcarcel BG. Economic evaluations of massive HPV vaccination: within study and between study variations in incremental cost per QALY gained. Prev Med. 2009;48:444–448. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Care are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES