Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;141(20):3978–3987. doi: 10.1242/dev.111906

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

GATA factors bind to both GATA and Gli binding sites surrounding the Gli1 promoter. (A) Schematic of the mouse Gli1 gene showing putative Gli binding sites [identified by Dai et al. (1999)] and GATA binding sites (those confirmed by EMSA with in vitro translated GATA6 are depicted as black ovals). (B) ChIP for HA or FOG1-associated sequences in polyclones of Sufu−/− MEFs infected with pOZ-HA (parental retrovirus) or pOZ-GATA5-HA, employing the primers depicted in A. (C) Sufu−/− MEFs programmed to express GATA4 or GATA5 were infected with lentiviruses encoding shRNAs targeting GFP or FOG1, and gene expression was assayed by RT-qPCR. Expression of the various genes was normalized to that of Tbp. *P≤0.05, **P≤0.001, Student's t-test. Error bars indicate s.d. n=2 (B, FOG1) or n=3 (B, HA; C). (D) SHH induces the expression of Nkx3.2 in the sclerotome, which both blocks the induction of Gata4/5/6 by subsequent BMP signals and represses the expression of a repressor of hedgehog signaling (termed ‘X’). Conversely, BMP-mediated induction of Gata4/5/6 dampens the response of mesodermal cells to hedgehog signaling (in a FOG-dependent fashion) and consequently blocks SHH-mediated induction of Nkx3.2 and Sox9.