Abstract
Aim
Protein kinase B (AKT) signaling frequently is deregulated in human cancers and plays an important role in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This preclinical study investigated the effect of MK-2206, a potent allosteric AKT inhibitor, on human NPC cells in vitro and in vivo.
Methods
The effect of MK-2206 on the growth and proliferation of CNE-1, CNE-2, HONE-1, and SUNE-1 cells was assessed by Cell Counting Kit 8 and colony formation assay. Flow cytometry was performed to analyze cell cycle and apoptosis. The effects of MK-2206 on the AKT pathway were analyzed by Western blotting. Autophagy induction was evaluated via electron microscopy and Western blot. To test the effects of MK-2206 in vivo, CNE-2 cells were subcutaneously implanted into nude mice. Tumor-bearing mice were treated orally with MK-2206 or placebo. Tumors were harvested for immunohistochemical analysis.
Results
In vitro, MK-2206 inhibited the four NPC cell line growths and reduced the sizes of the colonies in a dose-dependent manner. At 72 and 96 hours, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of MK-2206 in CNE-1, CNE-2, and HONE-1 cell lines were 3–5 μM, whereas in SUNE-1, IC50 was less than 1 μM, and MK-2206 induced cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase. However, our study found no evidence of apoptosis. MK-2206 induced autophagy in NPC cells, as evidenced by electron microscopy and Western blot, and inhibited the growth of tumors that were subcutaneously implanted in mice. Inhibition of downstream phosphorylation through the PRAS40 and S6 pathways seems to be the main mechanism for the MK-2206-induced growth inhibition.
Conclusion
Our preclinical study suggests that MK-2206’s antiproliferative effect may be useful for NPC treatment; however, strategies for reinforcing this effect are needed to maximize clinical benefit.
Keywords: AKT inhibitor, MK-2206, nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Introduction
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a squamous cell carcinoma arising from the epithelium lining of the posterior nasopharynx, although rare in most parts of the world, is particularly common in Southern China and Southeast Asia1 and has caused very serious health problems in these areas. NPC is highly sensitive to radiation and chemotherapy.2 However, even with combined radiation and chemotherapy treatment, the prognosis for the metastatic form of NPC is not ideal, with disease relapse rates as high as 82%.3,4 Therefore, there is an urgent need to improve NPC treatment, especially targeted therapy.
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represented a promising target against advanced NPC. Gefitinib, an oral quinazoline, is a highly selective EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor.5 However, phase 2 studies of patients with metastatic or locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma found limited activity of gefitinib in recurrent NPC.6,7 A preclinical study suggested that persistent Protein kinase B (AKT) activation in NPC may be an important reason for resistance to gefitinib.8 AKT (a serine/threonine kinase v-AKT murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog), also called protein kinase, which is an important downstream target of the phosphatidylinositol-3 OH kinase (PI3K), helps regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, glucose metabolism, and tumorigenesis.9,10 In NPC, the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway plays an important role in pathogenesis, and AKT promotes cell proliferation and survival.11,12 AKT can be deregulated through three different mechanisms:13 latent membrane proteins 1 can directly abnormally activate PI3K, leading to AKT phosphorylation,14 and AKT can also be directly abnormally activated by latent membrane proteins 2A15 and decreased levels of phosphatase and tensin homolog, which are partially responsible for the abnormal upregulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in NPC.16 AKT is deregulated in NPC as described earlier; therefore, it could be a potential target for cancer treatment.
MK-2206 is an orally active allosteric AKT inhibitor with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values in the nanomolar range and broad preclinical antitumor activity. It is equally potent toward purified recombinant human AKT1 (IC50, 5 nmol/L) and AKT2 enzyme (IC50, 12 nmol/L) and is approximately fivefold less potent against human AKT3 (IC50, 65 nmol/L).17 Recently, it has entered clinical development.18 In this study, we evaluated the antitumor growth effect of MK-2206 as a single agent in vitro and in vivo to investigate whether AKT was a promising new therapeutic target for NPC.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
One well-differentiated human NPC cell line, CNE-1, and three poorly differentiated human NPC cell lines, CNE-2, HONE-1, and SUNE-1, which were supplied as a present by Professor MS Zeng from State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, People’s Republic of China, were cultivated in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin (100 units/mL) in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere at 37°C. Logarithmically growing cells were used in the experiments.
Reagents and drug preparation
MK-2206 was obtained from Merck & Co., Inc., (Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA). The chemical name of MK-2206 is 8-[4-(1-aminocyclobutyl) phenyl]-9-phenyl-1, 2, 4-triazolo [3, 4-f]1 naphthyridin-3(2H)-one hydrochloride [1:1]. The stock solutions of MK-2206 were formulated in dimethyl sulfoxide, stored at −20°C, and diluted in fresh culture medium immediately before use for in vitro experiments. In vivo, 30% Captisol (CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lenexa, KS, USA) was used to dose the MK-2206.
Cell proliferation assay
The cells were seeded into 96-well plates at an appropriate density per well. Twenty-four hours after plating, varying concentrations of MK-2206 were added to the wells. Cell proliferation was determined by using the Cell Counting Kit 8 (Dojindo, Japan) at 72 or 96 hours after dosing. The optical density was measured at 450 nm on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader (SpectraMax M5; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The IC50 value was determined as the concentration resulting in 50% cell growth inhibition after a 72 or 96 hours exposure to the drug compared with untreated control cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate in at least three independent experiments.
Colony formation assay
Single-cell suspension at a density of 500 cells per well was seeded in six-well plates. On the second day, cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of MK-2206. The medium was replaced with fresh medium containing MK-2206 every 3 days. After 10 days, the medium was removed and the plates were stained for the formation of cell colonies with methylene blue trihydrate. The picture of the colonies was then taken using a digital camera.
Cell cycle analysis
Cells were grown in six-well plates, and after reaching 70% confluence, they were exposed to various concentrations of MK-2206 for 12, 24, and 48 hours. Cells were harvested by trypsinization, fixed with 70% ethanol, and stored at −20°C overnight. Cell nuclei were stained for 30 minutes in the dark with a solution containing RNase (0.2 mg/mL) and propidium iodide (0.05 mg/mL). Analysis was performed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Cytomics™ FC 500; Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA), and a total of 20,000 stained nuclei were analyzed. Cell cycle data were processed with CELL Quest software (Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). All experiments were performed in triplicate in at least three independent experiments.
Detection of cell apoptosis
The apoptosis in tumor cells was evaluated by Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) apoptosis assay and by diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) nuclear staining assay. For the Annexin V-FITC apoptosis assay, the cells were collected and washed with phosphate-buffered saline after exposure to MK-2206 at indicated concentrations for indicated times. Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide were used to determine the phosphatidylserine exposure on the outer plasma membrane. Flow cytometry analysis was performed using a Becton Dickinson FACScan.
For the DAPI nuclear staining assay, the cells on the coverglass in six-well plates were fixed with buffered formalin for 10 minutes, washed in ice cold phosphate-buffered saline, and soaked with DAPI staining solution in the dark. Then, the cover slips were put onto slides and the morphologic changes of apoptosis-characteristic nuclei were examined by fluorescent microscopy. Each test was repeated in triplicate.
Western blot analysis
After being treated with MK-2206, cells were harvested and lysed in cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). Proteins were resolved on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (F Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following antibodies from Cell Signaling Technologies: total AKT, phospho-AKT (S473), phospho-AKT (T308), phospho-glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3α/β (S21/9), phospho-proline-rich-Akt substrate, 40kDA (PRAS40) (T246), phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein (S235/236), and phospho-Tuberin/tuberous sclerosis complex2 (T1462), light chain 3 (LC3), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. After being incubated with an appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature, bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Cell Signaling Technology).
Electron microscopy
CNE-2 cells were cultured in the presence of media or MK-2206 (5 and 2.5 μmol/L, respectively) for 24 hours at 37°C. Cells were harvested with trypsin ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and fixed with 2.0% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). After fixation, samples were treated with 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, and embedded in resin. Ultrathin sections were placed on formvar-coated slot copper grids and then counterstained in uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate. Sections were finally viewed with an electron microscope (Tecnai G2 Spirit TWIN; FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
In vivo antitumor activity
All animal experiments were conducted according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the UK Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research. Four- to 6-week-old male BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Hunan Slac Jingda Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd., (Hunan, People’s Republic of China). CNE-2 cells at 1×107/mL were suspended in serum-free medium, and 0.2 mL medium was injected subcutaneously into the right flank of each nude mouse. When mean tumor volume reached approximately 50 mm3, the mice were randomized into three groups (n=7/group) with approximately equivalent ranges of tumor volume between groups. The MK-2206 was dosed with 30% Captisol (Cydex). MK-2206 (240 mg/kg, three times a week), MK-2206 (480 mg/kg, once a week), and 30% Captisol (Cydex) diluents were administered by oral gavage for 2 weeks for each group. Tumor growth was measured with calipers every other day, and the tumor volume was calculated by the following formula: volume (mm3) = length × width2 ×0.5.
Mice were killed when mean tumor volume in the control group was larger than 2,000 mm3. Harvested tumor specimens were weighed and fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin.
Immunohistochemical staining
Immunohistochemical staining was done on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of tumor excised from xenografts by using the standard avidin-biotin complex-peroxidase method, as described in our previous paper.19 Tumor sections were stained with anti-p-PRAS40 (T246), phospho-S6 ribosomal protein (S235/236).
Statistical analysis
Cell culture-based assays were repeated at least three times; data are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance, followed by Dennett’s test, was used to compare the percentages of cells in G1 phase under various concentrations of MK-2206, with the control group. Comparisons for mean final tumor volumes in the xenograft studies were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, and P-values of pairwise comparisons were adjusted with Bonferroni correction. Two-sided P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Proliferation inhibitory effects of MK-2206
The NPC cell lines CNE-1, CNE-2, HONE-1, and SUNE-1 were treated with increasing doses of MK-2206 (0–10 μmol/L) for 72 and 96 hours. As shown in Figure 1A–D, exposure to MK-2206 resulted in dose- and time-dependent inhibition of cell viability. At 72 and 96 hours, the IC50 values of MK-2206 in CNE-1, CNE-2, and HONE-1 cell lines were 3–5 μM, and in SUNE-1, they were less than 1 μM (Figure 1E). In the long-term colony formation assay, we obtained similar results; that is, that MK-2206 reduced the sizes of the colonies in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1F).
MK-2206 induced cell cycle arrest at G1 phase
The effects of MK-2206 on the cell cycle progression in poorly differentiated human NPC cell lines CNE-2, HONE-1, and SUNE-1 were determined by flow cytometry. In CNE-2 and HONE-1 cells, treatment with various concentrations of MK-2206 for 24 and 48 hours resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the percentage of cells in G0/G1 phase and a concomitant reduction of cell numbers in S phase. One-way analysis of variance followed by Dennett’s test was used to compare the percentages of cells in G1 phase under various concentrations of MK-2206 with the control group. Statistical significance (P<0.05) was observed when cells (CNE-2 and HONE-1) were treated with MK-2206 5 and 10 μmol/L for 24 hours and HONE-1 with MK-2206 10 μmol/L for 48 hours (Figure 2).
G1 arrest was also observed in SUNE-1 cell lines after being treated with MK-2206, although the trend was not as obvious as that in CNE-2 and HONE-1. Using HONE-1 and CNE-2 cells for subsequent studies, we next investigated the temporal pattern of G1 arrest after treatment with MK-2206 for 12 and 72 hours and found the G1 arrest was most typical in 24 hours treatment of MK-2206.
MK-2206 does not induce apoptosis
In our study, we also examined whether MK-2206 was capable of inducing apoptosis in NPC cells. Cell morphology stained with DAPI was observed to identify the apoptotic cell population. Treatment with MK-2206 for 24 and 48 hours did not appreciably induce apoptosis in NPC cell lines. One representative experiment is shown in Figure 3A (CNE-2 24 hours).
To further confirm our results, Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide double-staining assay was used to detect the apoptotic cells. Interestingly, no obvious increase in apoptotic cell death was detected when treated with an increasing dose of MK-2206 for 24, 48, or even 72 hours (Figure 3B).
MK-2206 inhibited phosphorylation of AKT downstream targets
GSK-3 is a substrate of PI3K/AKT.20 Proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa (PRAS40) is also one of the novel downstream target substrates of PI3K/AKT.21 Phosphorylated PRAS40 can mediate Akt signals to the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex, followed by phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein S6.22 That is to say, PRAS40, GSKα/β, and S6 are important downstream target substrates of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
We examined whether phosphorylation of downstream targets of AKT could be inhibited by MK-2206 in SUNE-1 and CNE-2 cell lines. As shown in Figure 4, after exposure to MK-2206 for 24 hours, the phosphorylation levels of PRAS40 and S6 were attenuated by MK-2206 in a dose-dependent manner. However, we did not see changes of phosphorylation of GSKα/β and AKT in our study.
MK-2206 induce autophagy in NPC cells
Autophagy is regulated by the AKT/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mTOR pathways,23 so we examined whether MK-2206 treatment triggers autophagy in NPC cells. Microtubule-associated protein 1 LC3, an essential autophagy protein, is a human homolog of the yeast ATG8.24 It is processed from a full-length protein (MAP-LC3-I) to a cleaved and lipidated form (LC3-II) during autophagy, and LC3-II has been used as a specific marker for autophagy.24,25 As shown in Figure 5A, after treatment with MK-2206 for 24 hours, the appearance of LC3-II in CNE-2 cells increased dose-dependently.
Formation of double membrane vacuoles that sequester organelles is also characteristic of autophagy.24 Electron microscopy visualized abundant double or multimembrane vacuoles in the cytoplasm of MK-2206-treated cells. In contrast, these vacuoles were rarely seen in the control cells (Figure 5B).
Antitumor activity of MK-2206 in vivo
We evaluated the efficacy of MK-2206 in CNE-2 xenografts in nude mice. In this experiment, we used two different doses of MK-2206. As presented in Figure 6A, compared with the control group (30% Captisol diluent), both MK-2206 doses (480 mg/kg once a week and 240 mg/kg three times a week) can inhibit the growth of human CNE-2 xenografts in nude mice. At the end of the experiment, we obtained identical results by directly measuring tumor weights. In the two MK-2206 groups, the tumor weights were much lighter than the control group (P<0.01; Figure 6B). Temporal body weight reduction was observed after receiving the MK-2206 treatment (Figure 6C). No other obvious toxicity was observed in mice.
Given the therapeutic efficacy of MK-2206 in our in vivo model, we examined the p-PRAS40 and p-S6 expressions in tumor samples. As shown in Figure 6D, phosphorylation levels of PRAS40 and S6 in the tumor were also inhibited by MK-2206.
Discussion
In the current study, in vitro dose-response curves showed that inhibition of AKT signaling with the allosteric inhibitor MK-2206 could attenuate cell growth. Furthermore, the IC50 value of MK-2206 was less than 1 μmol/L in SUNE-1 cell lines and was 3–5 μmol/L in the other three NPC cell lines. These results confirmed findings from previous studies of MK-2206 on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma26 and NPC.27 However, our in vivo data confirmed for the first time that AKT inhibition by MK-2206 could inhibit the growth of CNE-2 NPC cells subcutaneously implanted into nude mice.
Our in vitro data showed that MK-2206 reduced the phosphorylation levels of PRAS40 and S6 but did not change that of GSKα/β. This downstream regulation was also demonstrated in our in vivo model. PRAS40 is one of the novel downstream target substrates of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.21 Phosphorylation of PRAS40 at Thr246 by AKT facilitates efficient phosphorylation of Ser183 by mTORC1, which further results in phosphorylation of 4EBP1 and S6K1, followed by phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein S6.22 On the basis of these findings, we hypothesize that inhibition through the AKT/mTOR pathways seems to be the mechanism for NPC cell growth inhibition. In a clinical trial of MK-2206, immunofluorescence studies in hair follicles also indicated that the pThr246 signal on PRAS40 was effectively blocked.18
This trial, in patients with advanced solid tumors, also established that the maximum tolerated dose of MK-2206 administered on alternate days was 60 mg.18
Mean plasma concentration–time profiles after the first and last cycle 1 doses (60 mg, every other day) are less than 100 nM, which was slightly lower than the IC50 achieved in our in vitro study. Although preclinical data showed that MK-2206 monotherapy can inhibit the growth of NPC, clinical data suggest it may not be as effective as we expected. Strategies for reinforcing the activity of the AKT inhibitors are needed to make this type of drug more valuable.
We observed that a single treatment of MK-2206 can cause cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase in the NPC cell lines we tested. Cyclin D1, a cyclin required for G1 to S transition, which was found to be reduced on MK-2206 treatment, could be the main cause for the G1 block.28 However, it rarely induces any apoptosis. Because AKT/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mTOR pathways are related to autophagic activity,23 we supposed that this may be another possible mechanism of NPC cancer cell growth inhibition by MK-2206. As shown in our results, MK-2206 indeed caused autophagy in NPC cell lines, which was consistent with previous reports that autophagy is activated when AKT is inhibited.29
Although activation of autophagy (also termed type 2 programmed cell death) can promote autophagic cell death, this form of intracellular degradative process also has been noted to support cell survival.30 Cheng and colleagues reported that promoting the switch from autophagy to apoptotic cell death can enhance the effectiveness of MK-2206 against glioma.31 In NPC, the functional associations of autophagy with apoptosis in response to AKT inhibition remain largely unknown. Thus, whether suppressing autophagy would reinforce the antitumor activity needs to be clarified. Further evaluation is currently under way.
Only using four cell lines is one of the limitations of our study. It is not known whether other cell lines would respond differently to MK-2206 or yield additional insights in the differential response to AKT inhibition. Furthermore, there are potentially multiple strategies for reinforcing the activity of the AKT inhibitors that have yet to be tested. Despite these limitations, this study is one of very few preclinical studies that describe the use of AKT inhibition in NPC, suggesting a potential role for MK-2206 in the treatment of NPC in the future.
Acknowledgments
Martha Carroll Vollmer, MS, from Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA, provided editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. This work was also supported by National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA02A501).
Footnotes
Disclosures
Michael Lam and Li Yan are employed by Merck & Co., Inc. Merck supplied the drug MK-2206 used in this study but did not participate in the development of the protocol, the running of the trial, or analysis of results. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Altomare DA, Testa JR. Perturbations of the AKT signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene. 2005;24(50):7455–7464. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Altun M, Fandi A, Dupuis O, Cvitkovic E, Krajina Z, Eschwege F. Undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancer (UCNT): current diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32(3):859–877. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00516-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cheng SH, Jian JJ, Tsai SY, et al. Long-term survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma following concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48(5):1323–1330. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00779-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yamashita S, Kondo M, Hashimoto S. Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx. An analysis of failure patterns after radiation therapy. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1985;24(4):315–320. doi: 10.3109/02841868509136058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ranson M, Hammond LA, Ferry D, et al. ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well tolerated and active in patients with solid, malignant tumors: results of a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(9):2240–2250. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.10.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chua DT, Wei WI, Wong MP, Sham JS, Nicholls J, Au GK. Phase II study of gefitinib for the treatment of recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 2008;30(7):863–867. doi: 10.1002/hed.20792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ma B, Hui EP, King A, et al. A phase II study of patients with metastatic or locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma and evaluation of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA as a biomarker of efficacy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;62(1):59–64. doi: 10.1007/s00280-007-0575-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ma BB, Lui VW, Poon FF, et al. Preclinical activity of gefitinib in non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines and biomarkers of response. Invest New Drugs. 2010;28(3):326–333. doi: 10.1007/s10637-009-9316-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bellacosa A, Testa JR, Staal SP, Tsichlis PN. A retroviral oncogene, akt, encoding a serine-threonine kinase containing an SH2-like region. Science. 1991;254(5029):274–277. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5029.274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129(7):1261–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yip WK, Leong VC, Abdullah MA, Yusoff S, Seow HF. Overexpression of phospho-Akt correlates with phosphorylation of EGF receptor, FKHR and BAD in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2008;19(2):319–328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mei YP, Zhou JM, Wang Y, et al. Silencing of LMP1 induces cell cycle arrest and enhances chemosensitivity through inhibition of AKT signaling pathway in EBV-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cell Cycle. 2007;6(11):1379–1385. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.11.4274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chou J, Lin YC, Kim J, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma – review of the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Head Neck. 2008;30(7):946–963. doi: 10.1002/hed.20833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mainou BA, Everly DN, Jr, Raab-Traub N. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 CTAR1 mediates rodent and human fibroblast transformation through activation of PI3K. Oncogene. 2005;24(46):6917–6924. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Morrison JA, Raab-Traub N. Roles of the ITAM and PY motifs of Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2A in the inhibition of epithelial cell differentiation and activation of {beta}-catenin signaling. J Virol. 2005;79(4):2375–2382. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.4.2375-2382.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pedrero JM, Carracedo DG, Pinto CM, et al. Frequent genetic and biochemical alterations of the PI 3-K/AKT/PTEN pathway in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2005;114(2):242–248. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yan L. MK-2206: a potent oral allosteric AKT inhibitor; Presented at: 100th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; April 18–22, 2009; Denver, CO. Abstract DDT01–1. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yap TA, Yan L, Patnaik A, et al. First-in-man clinical trial of the oral pan-AKT inhibitor MK-2206 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(35):4688–4695. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.5263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhao YY, Xue C, Jiang W, et al. Predictive value of intratumoral microvascular density in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(1):71–75. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31823085f4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang H, Zhang Q, Wen Q, et al. Proline-rich Akt substrate of 40kDa (PRAS40): a novel downstream target of PI3k/Akt signaling pathway. Cell Signal. 2012;24(1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yap TA, Walton MI, Hunter LJ, et al. Preclinical pharmacology, antitumor activity, and development of pharmacodynamic markers for the novel, potent AKT inhibitor CCT128930. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10(2):360–371. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meric-Bernstam F, Gonzalez-Angulo AM. Targeting the mTOR signaling network for cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(13):2278–2287. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Takeuchi H, Kondo Y, Fujiwara K, et al. Synergistic augmentation of rapamycin-induced autophagy in malignant glioma cells by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3336–3346. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wu H, Yang JM, Jin S, Zhang H, Hait WN. Elongation factor-2 kinase regulates autophagy in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66(6):3015–3023. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mizushima N. Methods for monitoring autophagy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36(12):2491–2502. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Knowles JA, Golden B, Yan L, Carroll WR, Helman EE, Rosenthal EL. Disruption of the AKT pathway inhibits metastasis in an orthotopic model of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(11):2359–2365. doi: 10.1002/lary.22180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ma BB, Lui VW, Hui CW, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the AKT inhibitor MK-2206 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31(3):567–575. doi: 10.1007/s10637-012-9896-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jiao P, Zhou YS, Yang JX, et al. MK-2206 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HepG2 cells and sensitizes TRAIL-mediated cell death. Mol Cell Biochem. 2013;382(1–2):217–224. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1737-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Degtyarev M, De Mazière A, Orr C, et al. Akt inhibition promotes autophagy and sensitizes PTEN-null tumors to lysosomotropic agents. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(1):101–116. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200801099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kundu M, Thompson CB. Macroautophagy versus mitochondrial autophagy: a question of fate? Cell Death Differ. 2005;12(suppl 2):1484–1489. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cheng Y, Ren X, Zhang Y, et al. eEF-2 kinase dictates cross-talk between autophagy and apoptosis induced by Akt Inhibition, thereby modulating cytotoxicity of novel Akt inhibitor MK-2206. Cancer Res. 2011;71(7):2654–2663. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]