Abstract
Puccinellia tenuiflora is a monocotyledonous halophyte that is able to survive in extreme saline soil environments at an alkaline pH range of 9–10. In this study, we transformed full-length cDNAs of P. tenuiflora into Saccharomyces cerevisiae by using the full-length cDNA over-expressing gene-hunting system to identify novel salt-tolerance genes. In all, 32 yeast clones overexpressing P. tenuiflora cDNA were obtained by screening under NaCl stress conditions; of these, 31 clones showed stronger tolerance to NaCl and were amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced. Four novel genes encoding proteins with unknown function were identified; these genes had no homology with genes from higher plants. Of the four isolated genes, two that encoded proteins with two transmembrane domains showed the strongest resistance to 1.3 M NaCl. RT-PCR and northern blot analysis of P. tenuiflora cultured cells confirmed the endogenous NaCl-induced expression of the two proteins. Both of the proteins conferred better tolerance in yeasts to high salt, alkaline and osmotic conditions, some heavy metals and H2O2 stress. Thus, we inferred that the two novel proteins might alleviate oxidative and other stresses in P. tenuiflora.
Keywords: salt stress, halophyte, Puccinellia tenuiflora, salt-tolerant FOX-yeast lines
1. Introduction
In the natural environment, plants are often subjected to salinity, drought, low temperature and other external abiotic stresses. These adverse stresses affect normal physiological and biochemical activities, which seriously hinder the normal growth of plants. Salt stress is one of the major important abiotic stress factors in nature [1,2,3]. More than 6% of the land area (about 800 million hectares) worldwide is adversely affected by salt [4]. In northeast China, the area covered by saline-alkaline soil has reached 32 million ha, and the pH of such soils is more than 9.8 [5]. Saline-alkaline erosion might accelerate the loss of arable land in the medium term, with a projected loss of up to 50% by 2050 [6]. The effect of salt stress on plant growth is a result of the combined action of many factors. These factors affect photosynthesis and various physiological and biochemical pathways, thereby retarding the growth of plants and probably even leading to their death [7,8,9,10,11]. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms by which halophytes tolerate salt stress is critical. Indeed, the discovery of genes responsible for the core signaling pathways involved in the mitigation of salt stress might allow the generation of genetically engineered plants with more favorable agricultural properties.
Loss-of-function knockout mutants and activation-tagged gain-of-function mutants are widely used for the screening and analysis of gene functions in model plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. On the basis of these approaches, researchers have developed an alternative approach, the full-length cDNA over-expressing gene (FOX)-hunting system, which is faster and more economical. This method does not require any prior knowledge regarding the genome of interest or genetic mapping. The FOX-hunting system was first proposed as a selective screening technique for plant functional genes in 2006. In A. thaliana, this technique has been used to produce numerous dominant mutants, which has facilitated the elucidation of gene functions through phenotypic analysis [23]. Nakamura et al. [24] generated 12,000 transgenic rice strains, named as FOX-rice lines, which ectopically expressed rice full-length cDNAs under the control of the maize ubiquitin promoter and revealed that OsGLK1 regulated chloroplast development. Nonetheless, this technique is not limited to intraspecific strategies. Thellungiella salsuginea is a halophilic plant with a close phylogenetic relationship with A. thaliana. A method similar to FOX-hunting was applied to identify salt-tolerance genes in transgenic Arabidopsis that overexpressed cDNAs from an expression library derived from T. salsuginea [25]. In all, 130 Arabidopsis FOX-superroot lines have been generated in bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) for the systematic functional analysis of root genes and the selection of mutants with interesting root growth characteristics [26]. This technique is suggested to be extremely well-suited for the analysis of genes that control root length in L. corniculatus. Furthermore, this technique was successfully applied to identify genes that facilitated the survival of Eichhornia crassipes under low sulfur conditions [27]. Taken together, these data show that the FOX-hunting system is a very effective tool in plant functional gene research and that it facilitates the elucidation of the function of genes that control metabolic pathways and determine plant morphological characteristics.
Puccinellia tenuiflora (family, Gramineae) is a monocotyledonous halophyte distributed in the northeast region of China. Unlike other halophytes, P. tenuiflora can survive in extreme saline soil environments at an alkaline pH range of 9–10 [28,29]. Thus, this plant can be considered as an excellent model system for elucidating the genes involved in salt tolerance. Our previous cDNA microarray and expressed sequence tag analyses revealed many biotic and abiotic stress-induced genes that are abundantly expressed in P. tenuiflora [30,31]. These analyses allowed us to better understand the mechanisms of salt tolerance mechanisms in this plant. However, numerous other genes with unknown function have been reported to be differentially expressed in P. tenuiflora under salt stress, indicating that other genetic networks are involved in the response to stress conditions.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Selection of Salt-Tolerant FOX (Full-Length cDNA Over-Expressing Gene)-Yeast Lines from Yeast Full-Length P. tenuiflora cDNA Libraries
More than 1.6089 × 106 full-length cDNAs were obtained, of which 1000 colonies were randomly obtained for sequencing. This revealed that over 90% of the cDNAs were full length, and the length of most of these cDNAs was distributed between 0.2 and 4.0 kb, confirming the quality of the cDNA libraries [32]. These cDNA libraries were used to transform S. cerevisiae strain InVscI and used to screen salt-tolerant FOX-yeast lines. During the first selection, 170 yeast colonies were obtained and named as NaCl-1# through NaCl-170#. Monoclonal yeast colonies were used for secondary selection and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) identification; from these, 32 salt-tolerant FOX-yeast lines containing cDNA insertions were found.
2.2. Multi-Resistance and Sequence Analyses of Salt-Resistant FOX-Yeast Lines
Under normal growth conditions, the growth of the 32 salt-tolerant FOX-yeast lines was similar to that of the control yeast transformed with the empty pAUR101 vector (vector control, Figure 1a). When the medium was supplemented with 1 M NaCl, the growth of most salt-tolerant FOX-yeast lines were slightly improved compared with that of the vector control. When the NaCl concentration was increased to 1.3 M, the growth of the vector control was essentially blocked, whereas 31 of the 32 FOX-yeast lines continued to grow. Clones NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# were particularly salt-tolerant. Thus, most colonies of FOX-yeast lines showed significantly increased salt tolerance.
The relationship between the 32 FOX-yeast lines and other adverse stresses was explored by conducting multi-resistance analysis under alkaline, oxidative, osmotic and heavy metal stresses (Figure 1b). In the presence of 26 mM Na2CO3, 12 mM NaHCO3, 3 M H2O2 and 1.8 M sorbitol, most salt-tolerant FOX-yeast lines grew better than the vector control. The resistance profile was altered between FOX-yeast lines and the vector control after treatment with 8 mM Cu2+, which induced heavy metal stress (Figure 1). These data indicated that most colonies of FOX-yeast lines showed improved resistance to alkaline, oxidative and osmotic stresses. However, the FOX-yeast lines showed different resistance responses to heavy metal stress; the reason for this phenomenon was not investigated in the present study.
After multi-resistance analysis, the salt-tolerant FOX-yeast lines were subjected to molecular analysis. The sequences of primers used are listed in Table 1. Sequences were compared and analyzed using the BLAST program of the National Centre of Biotechnology Information [33]. Open reading frame (ORF) searches were conducted using ORF Finder from NCBI [34]. Full-length cDNA sequences are listed in Table 2. Thirty-two sequences were full-length cDNAs, and they had complete coding sequences with fragment lengths between 650 and 4000 bp. Inserts from the 25 FOX-yeast lines had known functions and high homology with the genes found in higher plants (such as Arabidopsis, rice, barley and corn). The homology of one unknown gene was similar to that of Zea mays, and four unknown genes were slightly homologous with those in lower organisms.
Table 1.
Primer Name | Sequences (from 5' to 3') |
---|---|
pAUR101-FW | CCGGATCGGACTACTAGCAGCTG |
pAUR101-RV | TAGGGACCTAGACTTCAGGTTGTC |
pYES2-construct-F158 | GGATCCCCGGATCGGACTATAGCAGCTG |
pYES2-construct-R158 | TCTGGATAGGGACCTAGACTTCAGGTTGTC |
pYES2-construct-F167 | GAATTCCCGGATCGGACTATAGCAGCTG |
pYES2-construct-R167 | CTCGAGTAGGGACCTAGACTTCAGGTTGTC |
Put-tubulin-F | GTGTCAGCCATACTGTGCCAATC |
Put-tubulin-R | TTGCTCATGCGGTCAGCAATACC |
NaCl-158#-F | GAGCAGAGGAGCAAGATG |
NaCl-158#-R | TTACACGGAGGACAGACAC |
NaCl-167#-F | ACAGTTGGGAGGAGCGTC |
NaCl-167#-R | CCACTCGATCTGCATTTCT |
Underlines were restriction sites.
Table 2.
NO. | Superfamily | Description | E-Value | Species and Accession |
---|---|---|---|---|
NaCl-3 | RbcS superfamily | ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase | 8 × 10−117 | Triticum aestivum [P00871.2] |
NaCl-9 | Metallothio 2 superfamily | metallothionein-like protein type 2 | 2 × 10−21 | Zea mays [ACF85243.1] |
NaCl-30 | Chloroa b bind superfamily | PSI type III chlorophyll a/b-binding protein | 6 × 10−92 | Arabidopsis thaliana [NP_001031217.1] |
NaCl-40 | - | glycine-rich cell wall structural protein | 3 × 10−5 | Oryza sativa [EAY86471.1] |
NaCl-41 | NAD binding 8 superfamily | thiamin biosynthetic enzyme | 0.0 | Triticum urartu [EMS66450.1] |
NaCl-42 | - | hypothetical protein ZEAMMB73879106 | - | Zea mays [AFW58868.1] |
NaCl-44 | AAI LTSS superfamily | lipid transfer protein | 8 × 10−44 | Triticum aestivum [ABB90546.1] |
NaCl-46 | PP-binding superfamily | acyl carrier protein 3 | 9 × 10−63 | Zea mays [ACG24988.1] |
NaCl-47 | Plant peroxidase like superfamily | Peroxidase | 1 × 10−165 | Glycine max [XP_003517206.1] |
NaCl-48 | - | Dehydrin | 3 × 10−58 | Hordeum vulgare [CAA50499.1] |
NaCl-51 | DIOX-N superfamily ACC oxidase | ACC oxidase | 5 × 10−140 | Glycine max [NP_001276303.1] |
NaCl-53 | - | nucleic acid binding/zinc ion binding | 2 × 10−31 | Arabidopsis thaliana [NP_001154741.1] |
NaCl-54 | - | unknown | 0.35 | - |
NaCl-55 | UBQ superfamily | Polyubiquitin3 | 2 × 10−167 | Arabidopsis thaliana [NP_851029.1] |
NaCl-57 | Ribosomal-S7e superfamily | 40S ribosomal protein S7 | 2 × 10−5 | Cucumis sativus [XP_004137317.1] |
NaCl-60 | - | neurogenic locus notch protein precursor-like | 5 × 10−89 | Zea mays [NP_001158958.1] |
NaCl-61 | Ribokinase-pfkB-like superfamily | fructokinase-2 | 5 × 10−154 | Arabidopsis thaliana [NP_191507.1] |
NaCl-62 | Cupin-2 superfamily | germin-like protein | 2 × 10−92 | Arabidopsis thaliana [AAB51752.1] |
NaCl-63 | - | Unknown | - | - |
NaCl-74 | TIM-phosphate binding superfamily | glycolate oxidase | 6 × 10−72 | Arabidopsis thaliana [AAB80700.1] |
NaCl-77 | Duf1313 superfamily | EARLY flowering protein | 5 × 10−33 | Zea mays [ACG45265.1] |
NaCl-79 | DOMON superfamily | auxin-responsive protein | 3 × 10−116 | Arabidopsis thaliana [NP_199564.1] |
NaCl-81 | Glycosyltransferase-GTB-type superfamily | trehalose-6-phosphate synthase | 0.0 | Oryza sativa [NP_001063104.1] |
NaCl-84 | PSI-psaK superfamily | photosystem I reaction center subunit psaK | 4 × 10−52 | Arabidopsis thaliana [CAB53033.1] |
NaCl-93 | Rubredoxin-like superfamily | rubredoxin family protein | 7 × 10−62 | Arabidopsis thaliana [NP_001078598.1] |
NaCl-101 | - | Unknown | 6 × 10−11 | Zea mays [DAA58889.1] |
NaCl-109 | PsbR superfamily | PSBR (photosystem II subunit R) | 7 × 10−63 | Oryza sativa Japonica Group [BAC83336.1] |
NaCl-116 | Ntn-hydrolase superfamily | proteasome subunit beta type 4 precursor | 3 × 10−156 | Zea mays [ACG33740.1] |
NaCl-125 | - | homeodomain leucine zipper protein | 2 × 10−106 | Zea mays [AFW63782.1] |
NaCl-128 | Ribosomal-L21e superfamily | 60S ribosomal protein L21 | 3 × 10−38 | Zea mays [DAA49694.1] |
NaCl-158 | - | Unknown | - | - |
NaCl-167 | - | Unknown | - | - |
2.3. Discovery of Two Novel Endogenous Genes of P. tenuiflora
Two of the isolated genes (NaCl-158# and NaCl-167#) that conferred strong salt resistance had only low homology with some genes found in lower organisms, and their functions are not yet known. RT-PCR was used to amplify RNA from cultured cells of P. tenuiflora that were treated with 200 mM NaCl for 12 h or that were left untreated. These two genes were highly expressed in P. tenuiflora after treatment with 200 mM NaCl. This revealed that the two genes were strongly induced after salt stress (Figure 2). As we knew that culture cells were grown under strict sterile conditions, these exclude the possibility that we had inadvertently selected for growth of other microorganisms. These results further confirmed that the genes encoded by the cDNA inserts of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# were expressed endogenously in P. tenuiflora and that these genes were salt inducible. Thus, we then investigated the expression patterns of the isolated genes under NaCl stress.
The primers shown in Table 1 were used to clone the full-length sequence of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167#. The cDNA of NaCl-158# was 1036 bp in length and encoded a protein of 84 amino acids (Figure 3a). The protein had two transmembrane structural domains, as predicted by an online software TMHMM-2.0 [35] (Figure 3a). Homologous nucleotide sequences were not detected in the NCBI database by BLASTN analysis. At the amino acid level, NaCl-158# showed a low level of homology with the suppressor for copper sensitivity (ScsB), a transmembrane protein isolated from Morganella morganii (ref|WP_004240832.1|). The cDNA of NaCl-167# was 867 bp and encoded a protein of 174 amino acids (Figure 3b). The protein encoded by this gene also had two transmembrane domains (Figure 3b). Homologous nucleotide sequences were not detected in the NCBI database by BLASTN analysis. At the amino acid level, NaCl-167# had low homology with a protein of unknown function, Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 (ref|YP_005030162.1|).
2.4. Expression Patterns of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167#
The expression patterns of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# were analyzed using northern blot analysis. NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# were found to be constitutively expressed in P. tenuiflora. NaCl-158# was expressed in stems and flowers, as well as in leaves and roots at high levels, but not in seeds (Figure 4a). NaCl-167# was expressed in roots, stems, leaves and seeds; it was highly expressed in roots, in low levels in leaves, but not in flowers (Figure 4b).
Subsequently, the expression of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# was monitored over a time course after cultured P. tenuiflora was treated with 200 mM NaCl. The NaCl-158# transcript levels in the cultured cells increased remarkably after NaCl treatment, peaked at 6 h and remained high until 48 h (Figure 4a) On the other hand, the NaCl-167# transcript levels in the cultured cells increased remarkably after NaCl treatment, peaked at 24 h and then decreased (Figure 4b). These results showed that NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# are constitutively expressed in P. tenuiflora and can be induced by NaCl stress.
2.5. Overexpression of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# in Yeast under Various Stress Conditions
NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# are genes encoding proteins with unknown function; both proteins have two predicted transmembrane helices (Figure 3). Therefore, we speculated that these proteins might be involved in ion transport and, thus, performed metal cation-resistance analysis experiments. The two cDNAs (NaCl-158# and NaCl-167#) were cloned into the expression vector, pYES2, to generate transgenic yeast. The strains were used to determine whether NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# could confer resistance to various metal cations. Each gene showed slightly different growth profiles in their hosts in response to different cations (Figure 5).
The growth of NaCl-158# transformants was similar to that of the vector control (pYES2) on contrast check (CK) media, but was considerably better than that of the vector control on media containing Ag+, Al3+ and Fe3+; growth was slightly improved in the presence of K+, Zn2+, Ni2+ and Cd2+ and was almost the same as that of the control in the presence of Mg2+, Ba2+, Mn2+ and Ca2+. In contrast, the cells were hyper-sensitive to Cu2+ and Co2+.
The growth of NaCl-167# transformants was similar to that of the vector control (pYES2) on CK media, but was considerably better than that of the vector control on media containing K+, Ag+, Mn2+, Al3+ and Fe3+; growth was slightly improved in the presence of Cd2+ and Mg2+ and was almost the same as that of control in the presence of Ba2+, Ca2+ and Zn2+. In contrast, the cells were slightly sensitive to Ni2+ and hyper-sensitive to Cu2+ and Co2+. Because of this heterogeneous response, the two transmembrane proteins could not be categorized as specific mediators of cation resistance.
The two yeast transformants of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# were also used to confirm salt tolerance (Figure 6). Under normal conditions, the growth of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# transformants was similar to that of the vector control (pYES2) on CK media. The growth of the vector control was blocked when the NaCl concentration reached 1.3 M, whereas the two yeast transformants continued to grow (Figure 1a. The protective effects of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# in response to stress were generalized by challenging the yeast transformants to other abiotic stresses, including NaHCO3, Na2CO3, sorbitol and heavy metal (CdCl2). Both NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# showed enhanced growth compared to that of the vector control on all of the media. A common adverse effect of all of these treatments was the generation of oxidative stress [36,37,38,39]. The growth of the two yeast transformants was considerably better than that of the vector control on media containing H2O2. Thus, we inferred that the two genes could confer resistance to oxidative stress. This might partially explain the resistance to metal cations, since they cause oxidative stress. However, two notable exceptions were Cu2+ and Co2+, since yeast cells overexpressing NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# were sensitive to these ions. This might be due to the specific aspects of Cu2+/Co2+ metabolism in yeast. Yeasts are eukaryotes; their metabolic pathways are similar to those of plants. Our experimental results in yeasts provided the primary basis for performing further studies. Investigating the function of these two genes in plants is necessary to determine the mechanism of how these two genes confer stress tolerance.
3. Experimental Section
3.1. Materials
Wild-type P. tenuiflora plants, tissues and organs (roots, stems, leaves, flowers and seeds) were collected from the Experimental Base Alkali Soil Natural Environmental Science Center (ASNESC), Northeast Forestry University (Harbin, China). These materials were used for RNA extraction and northern blot analysis. Cultured P. tenuiflora cells were treated with 200 mM NaCl for 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. RNA from these samples was used for RT-PCR and northern blot analyses. S. cerevisiae strain InVscI was used in the yeast transformation experiments.
3.2. Constructs
Construction of yeast expressing full-length cDNA libraries derived from P. tenuiflora: RNA samples extracted from seedlings (P. tenuiflora) treated with 200 mM NaCl were used. Full-length cDNA libraries of P. tenuiflora were constructed using the pGCAP10 vector in 2008. SwaI and NotI restriction enzyme sites were introduced at the 5' and 3' ends of each cDNA. Libraries of yeast expressing full-length cDNAs were constructed by ligating the cDNAs to the pAUR101 vector (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) after digestion with SwaI and NotI; the vectors were then transformed into S. cerevisiae strain InVscI byYeast Extract Peptone Dextrose Medium (YPD) using the LiAc/PEG yeast transformation method [40]. The transformed yeasts were cultivated on medium containing 50 mg/L abscisic acid (aba), with 3000–4000 clones on every plate. All yeast colonies were washed off the agar plates and completely resuspended. Suspensions were mixed with an equal volume of 80% glycerol, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.
Plasmid constructs: Full-length sequences of NaCl-158# and NaCl-167# clones were amplified from yeast DNA by using the primers, pYES2-construct-F158/pYES2-construct-R158 and pYES2-construct-F167/pYES2-construct-R167, respectively (Table 1). The amplified product was digested with restriction endonuclease and cloned into the yeast expression vector, pYES2 (TaKaRa), to form pYES2-NaCl-158# and pYES2-NaCl-167# plasmids. All products were confirmed by sequencing before use in yeast resistance tests.
3.3. Multiple Screening for Salt-Tolerant Transgenic Yeast Lines
Salt-tolerant yeast lines were isolated from the full-length cDNA libraries by using multiple screening and high NaCl concentration (1.3 M). Yeast library suspensions were activated, washed with sterile water 2–3 times, diluted with sterile water and coated with the solid medium, Yeast Extract Peptone Galactose Medium (YP-U), which contains 1.3 M NaCl and 2% galactose. Fifty replicates of plates containing 3000–4000 colonies/plate were interrogated to ensure full coverage of the cDNA libraries. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3–6 days; monoclonal FOX-yeast lines were selected and then cultured overnight in YPD liquid containing 50 mg/L aba. Cell density was adjusted on the basis of an OD600 of 0.5, and cells were washed twice with sterile water; 5 μL of diluted cells were spotted on 1.3 M solid NaCl YP-U medium containing 2% galactose for secondary screening. The following day, FOX-yeast lines that grew normally in 1.3 M NaCl YP-U medium were selected. Concomitantly, universal primers (pAUR101-FW and pAUR101-RV) were used to amplify DNA from the FOX-yeast lines identified in secondary screens. FOX-yeast lines that did not contain insertions were excluded from further analysis (the primers are shown in Table 1).
3.4. Yeast Resistance Analysis Media and Growth Conditions
All FOX-yeast lines and control strains cultured overnight were adjusted to an OD600 of 0.5. Ten-fold serial dilutions of all yeast were prepared (diluted over a five-log range of 10−1, 10−2, 10−3, 10−4 and 10−5). Five microliters of each dilution were spotted on solid YP-U medium containinga range of stress-inducing agents, including 1.0 M and 1.3 M NaCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 12 mM Na2CO3, 3 M H2O2, 1.8 M sorbitol and 8 mM CuCl2 (containing 2% galactose), and YPD medium was used as the control. All plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3–6 days before growth was scored.
The plasmids, pYES2-NaCl-158# and pYES2-NaCl-167#, and pYES2 empty vector were introduced into yeast strain INVSCI. Ten-fold serial dilutions of yeast were prepared, and 5 μL of each dilution were spotted on Solid yeast nitrogen base (YNB) medium (without amino acids Ura) SC-Ura medium containing a range of metal salts, including KCl, AgCl, CdCl2, ZnCl2, MgCl2, BaCl2, MnCl2, CaCl2, NiSO4, CuCl2, CoCl2, AlCl3, FeCl3, NaCl, NaHCO3, Na2CO3, sorbitol and H2O2. All of the plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3–7 days. All experiments were repeated three times.
3.5. Northern Blot Analysis
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) from various organs of P. tenuiflora and cultured P. tenuiflora cells treated with 200 mM NaCl for 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. For northern blot analysis, hybridization signals were detected using anti-DIG antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and CDP-Star (Roche), as described by Sambrook et al. [41]. Signals were detected using a luminescent image analyzer (Fujifilm, LAS-4000 mini, Tokyo, Japan).
4. Conclusions
In all, 32 FOX-yeast lines that had stronger tolerance to salt stress, alkali stress, osmotic stress and oxidative stress were identified. These results suggest that the FOX hunting system is a rapid and effective tool for the isolation of stress tolerance genes.
In this study, two genes (NaCl-158# and NaCl-167#) that conferred salt resistance were isolated using this method; intriguingly, these genes had only low homology with those from some lower organisms, and their functions were not yet known. In this regard, the resistance of transformed yeast to salt, alkaline conditions, osmotic stress and heavy metals indicates that the protective effect of both of the genes is directed via a common cellular pathway that is activated by all of these stresses. The oxidative stress pathway might be a prime candidate in this regard. In the future, we intend to elucidate the specific molecular mechanisms by which these genes exert their activity.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (C201406), the Program for Innovative Research Team by Chinese Ministry of Education (IRT13053), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2572014BA20) and The Open Project of the Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Improvement and Cultivation in Cold Regions of Heilongjiang Province (CGIC201204), awarded to Ying Li. We thank Editage for providing English editing services.
Author Contributions
Ying Li and Shenkui Liu designed the study. Ying Li performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. Shenkui Liu and Tetsuo Takano supervised the study and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Degenhardt B., Gimmler H., Hose E., Hartung W. Effect of alkaline and saline substrates on ABA contents, distribution and transport in plant roots. Plant Soil. 2000;225:83–94. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Greenway H., Munns R. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1980;31:149–190. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhu J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002;53:247–273. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Munns R., Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang C.M., Zhang J.L., Liu X.S., Li Z., Wu G.Q., Cai J.Y., Flowers T.J., Wang S.M. Puccinellia tenuiflora maintains a low Na+ level under salinity by limiting unidirectional Na+ influx resulting in a high selectivity for K+ over Na+ Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32:486–496. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01942.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang W., Vinocur B., Altman A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta. 2003;218:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Glenn E.P., Brown J.J., Blumwald E. Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1999;18:227–255. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25:239–250. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Niu X., Bressan R.A., Hasegawa P.M., Pardo J.M. Ion homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiol. 1995;109:735–742. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.3.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang C.W., Li C.Y., Zhang M.L., Liu J., Ju M., Shi D.C. pH and ion balance in wheat-wheatgrass under salt- or alkali stress. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008;19:1000–1005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yeo A. Molecular biology of salt tolerance in the context of whole-plant physiology. J. Exp. Bot. 1998;49:915–929. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alonso J.M., Stepanova A.N., Leisse T.J., Kim C.J., Chen H., Shinn P., Stevenson D.K., Zimmerman J., Barajas P., Cheuk R., et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003;301:653–657. doi: 10.1126/science.1086391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hirochika H., Guiderdoni E., An G., Hsing Y.I., Eun M.Y., Han C.D., Upadhyaya N., Ramachandran S., Zhang Q., Pereira A., et al. Rice mutant resources for gene discovery. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004;54:325–334. doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000036368.74758.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hsing Y.I., Chern C.G., Fan M.J., Lu P.C., Chen K.T., Lo S.F., Sun P.K., Ho S.L., Lee K.W., Wang Y.C., et al. A rice gene activation/knockout mutant resource for high throughput functional genomics. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007;63:351–364. doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-9093-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kolesnik T., Szeverenyi I., Bachmann D., Kumar C.S., Jiang S., Ramamoorthy R., Cai M., Ma Z.G., Sundaresan V., Ramachandran S. Establishing an efficient Ac/Ds tagging system in rice: large-scale analysis of Ds flanking sequences. Plant J. 2004;37:301–314. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01948.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kuromori T., Hirayama T., Kiyosue Y., Takabe H., Mizukado S., Sakurai T., Akiyama K., Kamiya A., Ito T., Shinozaki K. A collection of 11 800 single-copy Ds transposon insertion lines in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2004;37:897–905. doi: 10.1111/j.1365.313x.2004.02009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li J., Lease K.A., Tax F.E., Walker J.C. BRS1, a serine carboxypeptidase, regulates BRI1 signaling in Arabidopsis thalian. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:5916–5921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091065998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nakazawa M., Ichikawa T., Ishikawa A., Kobayashi H., Tsuhara Y., Kawashima M., Suzuki K., Muto S., Matsui M. Activation tagging, a novel tool to dissect the functions of a gene family. Plant J. 2003;34:741–750. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Upadhyaya N.M., Zhou X.-R., Zhu Q.-H., Ramm K., Wu L., Eamens A., Sivakumar R., Kato T., Yun D.-W., Santhoshkumar C., et al. An iAc/Ds gene and enhancer trapping system for insertional mutagenesis in rice. Funct. Plant Biol. 2002;29:547–559. doi: 10.1071/PP01205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Van Enckevort L.J., Droc G., Piffanelli P., Greco R., Gagneur C., Weber C., Gonzalez V.M., Cabot P., Fornara F., Berri S., et al. EU-OSTID: A collection of transposon insertional mutants for functional genomics in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005;59:99–110. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-8532-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Weigel D., Ahn J.H., Blazquez M.A., Borevitz J.O., Christensen S.K., Fankhauser C., Ferrandiz C., Kardailsky I., Malancharuvil E.J., Neff M.M., et al. Activation tagging in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000;122:1003–1013. doi: 10.1104/pp.122.4.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yoshizumi T., Tsumoto Y., Takiguchi T., Nagata N., Yamamoto Y.Y., Kawashima M., Ichikawa T., Nakazawa M., Yamamoto N., Matsui M. Increased level of polyploidy1, a conserved repressor of CYCLINA2 transcription, controls endoreduplication in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2452–2468. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.043869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ichikawa T., Nakazawa M., Kawashima M., Iizumi H., Kuroda H., Kondou Y., Tsuhara Y., Suzuki K., Ishikawa A., Seki M., et al. The FOX hunting system: An alternative gain-of-function gene hunting technique. Plant J. 2006;48:974–985. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02924.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nakamura H., Hakata M., Amano K., Miyao A., Toki N., Kajikawa M., Pang J., Higashi N., Ando S., Toki S., et al. A genome-wide gain-of function analysis of rice genes using the FOX-hunting system. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007;65:357–371. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9243-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Du J., Huang Y.P., Xi J., Cao M.J., Ni W.S., Chen X., Zhu J.K., Oliver D.J., Xiang C.B. Functional gene-mining for salt-tolerance genes with the power of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008;56:653–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03602.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Himuro Y., Tanaka H., Hashiguchi M., Ichikawa T., Nakazawa M., Seki M., Fujita M., Shinozaki K., Matsui M., Akashi R., et al. FOX-superroots of Lotus corniculatus, overexpressing Arabidopsis full-length cDNA, show stable variations in morphological traits. J. Plant Physiol. 2011;168:181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu X., Chen X., Oliver D.J., Xiang C.B. Isolation of a low-sulfur tolerance gene from Eichhornia crassipes using a functional gene-mining approach. Planta. 2009;231:211–219. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-1045-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wan C.G., Zou X. A study on salt tolerance of Puccinellia chinampoensis and its’ desalinizing effect on the soil. Pratacult. Sci. 1990;3:3–8. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Peng Y.H., Zhu Y.F., Mao Y.Q., Wang S.M., Su W.A., Tang Z.C. Alkali grass resists salt stress through high [K+] and an endodermis barrier to Na+ J. Exp. Bot. 2004;55:939–949. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang Y., Chu Y., Liu G., Wang M.H., Jiang J., Hou Y., Qu G., Yang C. Identification of expressed sequence tags in an alkali grass (Puccinellia tenuiflora) cDNA library. J. Plant Physiol. 2007;164:78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang Y., Yang C., Liu G., Jiang J. Development of a cDNA microarray to identify gene expression of Puccinellia tenuiflora under saline-alkali stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007;45:567–576. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu H., Zhang X., Takano T., Liu S. Characterization of a PutCAX1 gene from Puccinellia tenuiflora that confers Ca2+ and Ba2+ tolerance in yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;383:392–396. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.National Center for Biotechnology Information. [(accessed on 12 September 2014)]. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
- 34.ORF Finder. [(accessed on 12 September 2014)]. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/orfig.cgi.
- 35.TMHMM-2.0. [(accessed on 12 September 2014)]. Available online: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/
- 36.Dat J., Vandenabeele S., Vranova E., van Montagu M., Inze D., van Breusegem F. Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS. 2000;57:779–795. doi: 10.1007/s000180050041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Foyer C.H., Noctor G. Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: A re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant Cell Environ. 2005;28:1056–1071. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gomez J.M., Hernandez J.A., Jimenez A., del Rio L.A., Sevilla F. Differential response of antioxidative enzymes of chloroplasts and mitochondria to long-term NaCl stress of pea plants. Free Radic. Res. 1999;31:S11–S18. doi: 10.1080/10715769900301261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Van Assche F., Clijsters H. Effects of metals on enzyme activity in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1990;13:195–206. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gietz R.D., Schiestl R.H., Willems A.R., Woods R.A. Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast. 1995;11:355–360. doi: 10.1002/yea.320110408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sambrook J., Russell D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA: 2001. [Google Scholar]