Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2014 Jan 27;71(3):145–156. doi: 10.1002/cm.21162

Visualization of cytoskeletal dynamics in podocytes using adenoviral vectors

Jing Bi 1,^, Christopher D Pellenz 1,^, Mira Krendel 1,*
PMCID: PMC4201508  NIHMSID: NIHMS622858  PMID: 24415679

Abstract

Glomerular visceral epithelial cells (podocytes) play a key role in maintaining selective protein filtration in the kidney. Podocytes have a complex cell shape characterized by the presence of numerous actin-rich processes, which cover the surface of glomerular capillaries and are connected by specialized cell-cell adhesion complexes (slit diaphragms). Human genetic studies and experiments in knockout mouse models show that actin filaments and actin-associated proteins are indispensable for the maintenance of podocyte shape, slit diaphragm integrity, and normal glomerular filtration. The ability to examine cytoskeletal protein organization and dynamics in podocytes and to test the effects of disease-associated mutations on protein localization provides valuable information for researchers aiming to dissect the molecular mechanisms of podocyte dysfunction. We describe how adenovirus-mediated transduction of cultured podocytes with DNA constructs can be used to reliably introduce fluorescently tagged cytoskeletal markers for live cell imaging with high efficiency and low toxicity. This technique can be used to study the dynamic reorganization of the podocyte cytoskeleton and to test the effects of novel mutations on podocyte cytoskeletal dynamics.

Keywords: kidney, podocyte, actin, cytoskeleton, imaging

Introduction

Renal glomeruli play an important role in selective filtration in the kidney by allowing the passage of water, small solutes, and waste products into the primary urinary filtrate while retaining high molecular weight proteins. Glomerular visceral epithelial cells, also known as podocytes, are essential for selective protein filtration in the glomerulus [Greka and Mundel 2012; Pavenstadt et al. 2003].

Podocytes extend numerous interdigitating processes (foot processes), which cover the entire surface of glomerular capillaries and are interconnected by specialized cell-cell junctions, known as slit diaphragms. Loss of podocytes or disruption of the podocyte foot process architecture and slit diaphragm integrity results in defects in protein filtration, leading to proteinuria (protein in the urine) [Greka and Mundel 2012; Reiser and Sever 2013]. Nephrotic syndrome, a disease state characterized by the massive proteinuria due to the loss of selective glomerular filtration, is a serious health-threatening condition, which can lead to chronic kidney disease and renal failure. Disruption of glomerular filtration significantly increases the risk of death and cardiovascular complications in affected patients. Therefore, understanding molecular mechanisms leading to glomerular dysfunction is of major health importance.

Podocyte cytoskeleton is necessary for the maintenance of normal podocyte structure, and disruption of the cytoskeletal organization in podocytes leads to the flattening (effacement) of foot processes, loss of slit diaphragm integrity, and defects in filtration [Faul et al. 2007; Mathieson 2012; Welsh and Saleem 2012]. Human genetic studies have identified mutations in several components of the actin cytoskeleton that are associated with glomerular dysfunction. These include actin crosslinker α-actinin-4, actin assembly regulator INF2, scaffolding protein CD2AP, and actin-dependent molecular motor myosin 1e [Brown et al. 2010; Kaplan et al. 2000; Kim et al. 2003; Mele et al. 2011; Sanna-Cherchi et al. 2011]. Many glomerular disorders have also been linked to the proteolytic degradation of the important regulators of podocyte actin organization, for example, synaptopodin [Mundel and Reiser 2010], further underscoring the importance of the actin cytoskeleton for normal podocyte functions. The ability to characterize the intracellular localization of normal and mutant cytoskeletal proteins and the effects of disease-associated mutations on the cytoskeletal dynamics in podocytes is important in order to establish the mechanistic links between specific mutations found in patients and the corresponding glomerular defects.

Many studies of podocyte biology that require detailed characterization of molecular mechanisms underlying glomerular disease rely on the use of cultured podocytes. Primary podocyte cultures can be derived from explants growing out from isolated glomeruli, which are obtained using differential sieving of the kidney cortex or magnetic bead isolation and plated onto collagen-coated culture dishes [Katsuya et al. 2006; Shankland et al. 2007]. Derivation of podocyte explants from the transgenic mouse strain carrying a temperature-sensitive, interferon-inducible version of the immortalizing large T-antigen of SV-40 virus (Immortomouse) [Jat et al. 1991], allows establishment of stable, conditionally immortalized podocyte cell lines [Mundel et al. 1997b; Schiwek et al. 2004]. Alternatively, podocyte cell lines (for example, those derived from human glomeruli) can be conditionally immortalized by the retrovirus-mediated expression of the temperature-sensitive large T antigen [Ni et al. 2012; Saleem et al. 2002]. Conditionally immortalized podocytes can be maintained under the permissive conditions (33°C + interferon) and switched to non-permissive conditions (37°C or 38°C) in order to induce differentiation. A detailed discussion of the technical challenges and advantages of maintaining podocytes in culture is provided in [Shankland et al. 2007]. While differentiated podocytes in culture do not fully recapitulate the complex architecture of podocytes in vivo, they do express many proteins characteristic of podocytes and represent a valuable in vitro model for testing the effects of disease-associated mutations. An additional advantage of conditionally immortalized podocyte lines is the ability to derive these cells from knockout animal models lacking the protein of interest. These knockout podocytes can then be used to reintroduce the wild type or mutant protein and to examine its effects on the podocyte phenotype [Bi et al. 2013].

One of the challenges in working with conditionally immortalized podocytes is the low efficiency of expression of recombinant proteins (for example, fluorescently tagged proteins for live imaging studies). Non-differentiated podocytes can be transiently transfected using standard transfection reagents; however, the transfection efficiency, even under optimized conditions, rarely exceeds 20% [Shankland et al. 2007]. Since a typical experiment utilizing differentiated podocytes requires 7–14 days of growth under non-permissive conditions to obtain fully differentiated cells, plasmids introduced by transient transfection are likely to be lost. Alternatively, stably transfected cell lines can be derived using either a transient transfection or lentiviral infection of non-differentiated podocytes with subsequent antibiotic selection [Kaufman et al. 2007; Reiser et al. 2004]. Establishment of stable cell lines is a lengthy process and it limits the ability to introduce multiple markers into the same cell line (for example, two proteins with distinct fluorescence tags).

Live cell imaging provides valuable information regarding protein dynamics within cells and the changes in cell shape and organization. Several techniques have been used to introduce plasmids encoding fluorescently tagged proteins into differentiated podocytes for live imaging, including transfection [Endlich et al. 2009; Welsch et al. 2005], microinjection [Lennon et al. 2008], and electroporation/nucleofection [Soda et al. 2012]. Proteins directly labeled with fluorophores can also be introduced into podocytes by microinjection [Welsch et al. 2005]. Adenoviral infection has also been successfully used to introduce fluorescently labeled constructs encoding actin-binding protein, α-actinin-4, into podocytes [Michaud et al. 2009].

In this paper, we provide a detailed characterization of the use of adenoviral vectors for expression of fluorescently tagged proteins in podocytes for live cell imaging. We test the efficiency of adenoviral infection and show that adenoviral vectors provide a versatile system for reliable protein expression in podocytes without significant toxicity, allowing simultaneous introduction of multiple constructs for multi-color imaging.

Reagents and instruments

Microscopes

Epifluorescence imaging was performed using either a Nikon Eclipse TE-2000E microscope equipped with a PlanApo TIRF 60×/1.45 NA objective, Harvard Instruments dish warmer for 37°C incubation, and Hamamatsu ORCAII CCD camera or a Leica AF6000 LX deconvolution microscope equipped with a 40×/1.25 NA and a 63×/1.3 NA HCX PL APO objectives, an environmental chamber, and Andor LucaR EMCCD camera. Confocal imaging was performed using Perkin-Elmer UltraView VoX Spinning Disk Confocal system mounted on a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope and equipped with a 60×/1.49 NA APO TIRF objective, Hamamatsu C9100-50 EMCCD camera, and an environmental chamber to maintain cells at 37°C.

Reagents

RPMI 1640 medium 1× (Hyclone), Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), and antibiotic/antimycotic solution (ABM) (100×) were purchased from Fisher Scientific. Rat tail collagen type I and type IV were obtained from BD Biosciences. Interferon-γ was purchased from EMD Chemicals. Adenovirus kits (AdEasy™ Adenoviral Vector System and AdEasy Virus Purification Kits) were from Agilent Technologies. Clarity enhanced chemiluminescence substrate for Western blot analysis was from Bio-Rad.

Mouse anti-synaptopodin antibody (clone G1D4) was from Meridian Life Science. Rabbit anti-myo1e antibody was prepared using GST-tagged human myo1e tail as the antigen, and its specificity was characterized using tissue lysates prepared from myo1e-null and wild type mice.

Methods

Podocyte maintenance

Undifferentiated podocytes originally isolated by [Mundel et al. 1997b] were cultured as described therein. Briefly, 1–2 ×105 undifferentiated podocytes were plated into a 100 mm collagen I-coated tissue culture dish in 10 ml complete RPMI (RPMI + antibiotic/antimycotic solution + 10% FBS + interferon-γ at 50 U/ml) at 33°C, 5% CO2 and subcultured every 2 – 3 days to avoid confluency.

Podocyte differentiation for imaging

1.5 × 104 undifferentiated podocytes were plated into a 35mm collagen IV coated glass bottom dish (Mattek, Ashland, MA) or into a 35mm dish containing collagen-coated glass coverslip in 2 ml complete RPMI without interferon-γ, shifted to 37°C and allowed to differentiate for 14 days. Medium was changed every 2 – 3 days. At the time of infection and imaging, podocytes were at approximately 60–70% confluency.

Collagen coating

For tissue culture plastic dishes:

Collagen I was diluted to 0.1 mg/ml in PBS with 20 mM acetic acid. 5 ml of diluted collagen I was added to 100mm dish, incubated at 37°C for 1 hour, dishes were washed 3 times with PBS, and used immediately or allowed to dry and stored at 4°C.

For Mattek glass bottom dishes or coverslips:

Collagen IV was diluted to 10 µg/ml in 0.05 N HCl, added to the glass substrate, incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. After 3 washes with PBS, dishes were used immediately or allowed to dry and stored at 4°C.

Adenoviral vector preparation

AdEasy XL Adenoviral System (Agilent Technologies) was used as the source of the vectors and cells required to clone and package recombinant adenovirus. cDNA encoding protein of interest fused with a fluorescent protein tag (EGFP or mCherry) was initially cloned into the pShuttle vector using either standard restriction/ligation mediated cloning or the InFusion cloning kit (Clontech). Coding sequences of human myo1e, human ZO-1 (obtained from Alan Fanning, UNC), human synaptopodin (long isoform, a generous gift from Peter Mundel, Mass General) [Asanuma et al. 2005], rat clathrin light chain (generous gift from Pietro De Camilli, Rushika Perera, and Roberto Zoncu), or Lifeact were used for cloning into the pShuttle vector. All constructs were expressed under the control of CMV promoter, which was either transferred into the promotorless pShuttle vector from the intermediate cloning vector (for example, pEGFP-C1 (Clontech)) or was contained within the pShuttle-CMV vector. The fusion constructs in pShuttle vector were tested by standard DNA transfection into an appropriate eukaryotic cell line (e.g., Cos-7) to confirm protein expression and localization prior to the investment of the effort required to make adenoviral particles.

Recombination of the shuttle vector with pAdEasy-1 plasmid, which contains most of the human adenoviral Ad5 genome, was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Agilent Technologies). Viral particles were obtained by transfection of HEK-293 or AD-293 cells. According to the standard protocol, the recombinant pAd DNA needs to be linearized before transfection, yielding a ~30Kb fragment and either a 3 or 4.5 Kb bacterial sequence fragment. The resulting adenoviral genome fragment (~30 Kb) can be isolated by gel purification. Due to the large size of the DNA fragment, standard resin column gel purification methods may not produce high yield of DNA necessary for productive transfection. We found that phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol extraction of the entire digest mixture followed by ethanol precipitation produced adequate yields of transfectable DNA.

60 mm dish of HEK-293 or AD293 cells was transfected using JetPEI (Polyplus) and 5 µg of linearized pAd plasmid. Transfected cultures were monitored for cytopathic effect (cells rounding up and floating). When cytopathic effect was evident, cells were scraped off and transferred along with the culture media (~ 5ml) into a 15ml screw top tube. Cells were lysed by three cycles of freezing at −80° C and thawing in a 25°C water bath followed by vigorous vortexing after each cycle. Alternatively, to shorten the time necessary to freeze the lysate, a dry ice / ethanol bath may be used. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 3000×g at 4°C for 15 minutes. The supernatant, containing the primary crude viral lysate (primary CVL), was transferred into a sterile tube and used to test protein expression and localization in podocytes.

For plaque purification of the virus, 5 × 105 293 cells were plated into each well of a 6 well tissue culture plate and incubated at 37° C, 5% CO2 overnight. 0.1 ml of serial dilutions of primary CVL from 10−3 to 10−7 or mock infection control were used to infect each well by incubation for 1 hour, 37°C, 5% CO2 with gentle rocking of plate every 15 minutes.

Prior to infection, we prepared 2× DMEM (from powder), 2× ABM, 15% FBS, warmed up to 37° C. 3% SeaPlaque agarose (Lonza) in water was melted by boiling and cooled to 42° C. Equal volumes of 2× media and agarose solution was mixed and 3 ml of the mixture was immediately but gently overlayed on infected cell monolayers. Cells were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cultures were overlayed with 1 ml newly prepared media / agarose mixture based on the color change of phenol red indicator to yellow, usually at least once per week. Plaques became visible within one to three weeks. Several well isolated plaques were collected using a micropipettor or a Pasteur pipette, by aspirating the plaque and dispensing into a microcentrifuge tube containing 300 ul infection media. Cells were lysed by freeze / thawing 3 times, vortexing after each thaw. Cellular debris and agarose were pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000 × g, 5 minutes, and supernatant (CVL0) was transferred to new tube.

Amplification 1

5×105 293 cells were plated into 35mm dish and grown overnight. 100 µl of CVL0 + 400 µl infection media was added to the monolayer for one hour, with gentle rocking every 15 minutes. After 1 hour, 1.5 ml medium was added to each dish. Cytopathic effect was typically observed after 2 – 3 days. At this point, cells were scraped off, media and cells were collected and transferred to a Falcon 2063 tube. Cells were lysed by freeze / thawing 3 times, vortexing after each thaw. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 3000 × g at 4° C for 15 minutes. The viral supernatant CVL1 was transferred into a sterile Falcon 2063 tube.

Amplification 2

2 × 106 293 cells were plated into 60mm dish and grown overnight. Using 500 µl CVL1, cell monolayer was infected for one hour, with gentle rocking every 15 minutes. After 1 hour, 2.5 ml medium was added to each dish. Cytopathic effect was typically complete after 2 days. Viral supernatant was collected as described for amplification 1, producing CVL2.

Large Scale Amplification

The day prior to infection, a 175 cm2 tissue culture flask of 293 cells was split in to five 175 cm2 flasks so that the monolayer was 80% confluent the day of infection. 2.5 ml CVL2 was diluted in 22.5 ml infection media. Each of the 5 flasks was infected with 5ml diluted CVL2 at 37°C, 5% CO2 for one hour, with gentle rocking every 15 minutes. After 1 hour, 15 ml of medium was added to each flask. When cytopathic effect was complete, cells were scraped and collected for purification of high titer viral stock. AdEasy Virus Purification Kit (Agilent Technologies) was used to purify high titer viral stocks. Purified virus was exchanged into the cryoprotective long-term storage buffer as suggested by the manufacturer.

Viral concentration (plaque forming units (PFU)/ml) was determined by plaque assay following the same procedure as described above for the isolation of the viral plaques. Generally, 1 ml viral stock of 1 × 108 PFU/ml was obtained from each preparation. Stocks were aliquoted and stored at −80°C

Infecting podocytes

Cells were infected by diluting virus in infection media (RPMI, ABM, 2% FBS) and adding to cells 24 hrs before imaging. Typical dilution used for live cell imaging was 1 × 105 PFU/ml; however, some viruses were diluted to a lower concentration as empirically determined to avoid overexpression (for example, mCherry-Lifeact). For expression of multiple markers, two viruses were combined and used for infection at the same time. Culture media was removed and replaced with the diluted virus in a minimum volume required to cover the cell monolayer, typically 0.1 ml in a 35 mm dish or 1 ml in a 100 mm dish. Using this infection protocol with virus concentration of 1 × 105 PFU/ml, the multiplicity of infection (MOI, or the ratio of virus particles to cells) was estimated to be approximately 1. It should be noted that, based on testing various infection protocols, we did not observe an increase in infection efficiency with increasing volume of virus-containing solution. Thus, infection efficiency appears to depend primarily on virus concentration (PFU/ml) rather than on the total number of virus particles in the dish.

Virus may be added directly to the entire culture volume at the same concentration. However, to minimize the chance of a spill as well as to conserve the viral material, the minimum volume method is preferable. The dishes were returned to 37° C, 5% CO2 for 1 hour with gentle rocking every 15 minutes to distribute the diluted virus across the monolayer. At the completion of the infection period, diluted virus was removed if desired and complete media was added to the culture (RPMI, ABM, 10% FBS).

For time-course infection, cells were infected at a concentration of 1 × 106 PFU/ml and transgenes were allowed to express for different amounts of time before being lysed and analyzed by western blot.

Western blotting and gel quantitation

WT podocytes were infected with different concentrations of adenoviral vector encoding GFP-myo1e for 24 hours. The cells were then lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50mM Tris-HCl pH=7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 10% glycerol) with Complete protease inhibitor (Roche), followed by SDS-PAGE. The samples were blotted using anti-myo1e antibody, and developed with Clarity enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (Bio-Rad).

For gel quantitation, the images were taken using a gel imager (ChemiDoc system, Bio-Rad) and quantified using ImageJ software.

Immunofluorescence staining

WT podocytes were plated on collagen IV coated coverslips and processed as described (Chase et al., 2012). The cells were stained for endogenous synaptopodin.

MTT assay for cell viability

Wild type podocytes were plated at 1000 cells/ well in a 96-well plate and allowed to differentiate at 37°C. Cells were mock-infected or infected with the indicated concentrations of the adenoviral vector encoding mCherry (pAd-mCherry) for the indicated time period. To perform the assay, the medium was removed and replaced with 100 µl of DMEM without phenol red and 10 µl of 5 mg/ml MTT (methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide), and the plate was incubated 4 hours at 37°C. Following the incubation, 85 µl of the medium were removed and 50 µl of DMSO were added to each well. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 10 min, and the absorbance at 540 nm wavelength was measured using a plate reader.

Results

Adenoviral vector infection has high efficiency and low toxicity

Using adenoviral vectors for infecting differentiated mouse podocytes in culture, we routinely observed high efficiency of infection (more than 50% of cells infected). To quantify the infection efficiency, we used an adenoviral vector encoding mCherry fluorescent protein (Ad-mCherry) to infect both differentiated and non-differentiated podocytes. Four different concentrations of adenovirus (PFU/ml of medium) were used in the experiments. To collect the images of infected cells, an identical exposure time (1.5 s) was used to capture mCherry fluorescence signal in all cells. More than 90% of cells were infected using adenovirus at 106 PFU/ml, with the efficiency of infection decreasing gradually at lower virus concentration (Figure 1A). Slightly higher infection efficiency was observed when applying adenovirus to non-differentiated podocytes compared to the differentiated cells. However, this difference was relatively small, confirming our observations that adenovirus can be used to readily infect differentiated, non-proliferating podocytes. Since mCherry is a relatively small protein (~20kD), we also used adenovirally encoded mCherry-synaptopodin long isoform (~120kD) to test the infection efficiency of a vector containing a larger expression construct. As shown in Figure 1B, the size of the fusion protein did not affect infection efficiency.

Figure 1. Adenoviral infection of podocytes is characterized by high efficiency and low toxicity.

Figure 1

A, adenoviral infection efficiency of non-differentiated vs. differentiated podocytes was determined using different concentrations of mCherry-encoding adenovirus. Fraction of infected cells was determined using a ratio of the number of cells expressing mCherry to the number of DAPI-labeled nuclei. B, adenoviral infection efficiency of differentiated podocytes infected with an adenoviral vector encoding mCherry vs. an adenoviral vector encoding mCherry-synaptopodin. Fraction of infected cells was determined as in A. C, MTT-based viability assay on differentiated podocytes 24 hours after being infected with an adenoviral vector encoding mCherry. Equal numbers of cells were plated into each well and infected with the adenovirus at indicated concentrations. OD540 is proportionate to the number of viable cells. D. MTT-based viability assay on differentiated podocytes at 96 hours (4 days) after being infected with adenovirus at indicated concentrations.

Some methods of introducing expression constructs into differentiated cells, such as electroporation, are accompanied by the high degree of cell death. Our observations indicated that adenoviral infection was not accompanied by toxic effects on cells, since very little cell detachment and death was observed in the infected cultures. To quantify the effects of adenoviral infection on cell viability, we used an MTT assay (Figure 1C–D). We did not observe an increase in cell death in virus-infected cells compared to the mock infection at one day post-infection (Figure 1C), and even after 4 days cell number was not decreased in the infected wells compared to the mock-infected cells (Figure 1D). Thus, at concentrations used in our experiments, adenoviral infection of podocytes does not affect cell viability.

Expression level of recombinant proteins

Overexpression of recombinant proteins compared to the endogenous level of the same protein is often a concern in transient transfection experiments, particularly those aimed at analyzing protein dynamics in live cells. In order to compare the expression level of a recombinant protein achieved using either adenoviral infection or a transient DNA tranfection, we used constructs encoding EGFP-tagged myosin 1e (Ad-GFP-myo1e or pEGFP-C1-myo1e). An antibody against myo1e was used to determine the amount of GFP-myo1e and the endogenous myo1e (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 2A, GFP-myo1e expression level in podocytes 24 hours after an infection with the adenovirus at 104 or 5 × 104 PFU/ml was 0.8 and 3-fold higher than the level of expression of endogenous myo1e, respectively. GFP-myo1e expression level in Cos-7 cells 24 hours after standard DNA transfection was so high that the endogenous myo1e band was completely obscured by the overexpressed protein (Figure 2B). According to Figure 1A, using adenovirus at 104 and 5 × 104 PFU/ml results in infection of approximately 15% and 45% of cells, respectively. When the fraction of cells infected was taken into account, we calculated that GFP-myo1e concentration in each infected cell was on average 4.6–4.7-fold higher than the level of endogenous myo1e (Figure 2A). While this level of overexpression was more moderate than that observed with the DNA transfection of Cos-7 cells, we decided to further investigate whether expression level of the recombinant protein could be modulated by changing the time of expression. We conducted a time course experiment using the adenoviral vector encoding GFP-myo1e to infect wild type podocytes at a concentration of 106 PFU/ml, at which more than 95% of cells should be infected. GFP-myo1e expression level was analyzed at different time points post-infection (Figure 2C). At 4 hours post infection, the expression level of GFP fusion protein was similar to the endogenous level of myo1e (91% of the endogenous level). Thus, adjusting the time of expression makes it possible to express adenovirally delivered constructs at the same level as the endogenous protein. This observation may be particularly useful in some rescue experiments to avoid potential negative effects of protein overexpression.

Figure 2. Western blot analysis of cell lysates prepared from differentiated podocytes infected with different concentrations of the adenoviral vector encoding GFP-myo1e.

Figure 2

A, wild type podocytes were infected with adenoviral vector encoding GFP-myo1e at indicated concentrations. Cells were lysed at 24 hours post-infection, and gel samples were processed for SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using anti-myo1e antibody. Ratio of GFP-tagged myosin to the endogenous myosin was calculated by dividing GFP fusion band intensity expression (upper band) by the intensity of the endogenous myo1e (lower band). Fold overexpression was calculated by taking into account the fraction of cells that are expected to be infected at a given adenovirus concentration. B, Cos-7 cells were transfected with GFP-myo1e plasmid. Cells were lysed 24 hours after the transfection and analyzed by Western blotting. C, wild type podocytes were infected with the adenoviral vector encoding GFP-myo1e at the concentration of 106 PFU/ml, which results in infection of >95% of cells. Cells were lysed every 4 hours post infection, and gel samples were analyzed by Western blotting.

Using adenovirally encoded cytoskeletal probes to visualize podocyte cytoskeleton

We have developed several adenoviral vectors encoding cytoskeletal marker proteins fused to EGFP or mCherry that can be used for live cell imaging. These proteins (Figure 3) represent important markers of the podocyte cytoskeleton and cytoskeleton-associated structures. All of the markers shown can be visualized using either confocal microscopy (spinning disk confocal microscope was used to allow rapid acquisition of images from live cells) or conventional epifluorescence microscopy. Since podocytes are fairly flat, satisfactory results were obtained using both confocal and epifluorescence imaging. All microscopes used in this study were equipped with temperature controlled chambers or stage warmers to maintain cells at 37°C.

Figure 3. Localization of fluorescently labeled cytoskeletal markers in differentiated podocytes.

Figure 3

A, B, single confocal images showing localization of GFP-tagged wild type myo1e (A) and disease-associated myo1e mutant (B). A, arrows indicate myo1e localization to filopodia-like projections and vesicle-bound myo1e. B, myo1e mutant (A159P) does not localize to actin-containing projections or to vesicles. C–F, epifluorescence images showing localization of mCherry-tagged synaptopodin (C), Lifeact (D), Clathrin Light Chain (E), and ZO-1 (F) in differentiated podocytes. C’, immunostaining against endogenous synaptopodin in a differentiated podocyte. E’: enlarged image of the boxed region in E. Arrows in F point to cell-cell junctions, where ZO-1 is enriched. Viral concentrations used to infect podocytes were 105 PFU/ml for all constructs. Scale bars: 10 µm.

Myosin 1e (myo1e) is an unconventional myosin necessary for normal podocyte development [Chase et al. 2012] and represents one of the protein components of the glomerular slit diaphragm [Bi et al. 2013]. Myo1e is involved in clathrin-dependent endocytosis [Cheng et al. 2012; Krendel et al. 2007] and formation of cell-cell contacts [Bi et al. 2013]. GFP-myo1e expressed in podocytes localized to the newly forming lamellipodia and filopodia (Figure 3A, arrows), to cell-cell junctions, and to clathrin-coated vesicles (Figure 5C–D; [Soda et al. 2012]). Mutations in MYO1E gene are associated with familial kidney disease focal segmental glomerulosclerosis [Al-Hamed et al. 2013; Mele et al. 2011; Sanna-Cherchi et al. 2011]. One of the disease-associated mutations in MYO1E replaces a highly conserved alanine 159, located near the Switch I region in the motor domain, with proline [Mele et al. 2011]. When adenovirally encoded GFP-myo1e-A159P was expressed in podocytes, it displayed a diffuse cytoplasmic localization, indicating the loss of the ability to localize to actin-containing structures (Figure 3B, [Bi et al. 2013; Mele et al. 2011]).

Figure 5. Visualization of podocyte cytoskeletal dynamics using multi-color live cell imaging.

Figure 5

Differentiated podocytes were co-infected with GFP-myo1e (A) and mCherry-synaptopodin (A’) (A–B), or GFP-myo1e (C) and mCherry-clathrin light chain (C’) (C–D) and imaged using epifluorescence microscopy. Arrows in A point to synaptopodin-labeled stress fibers, arrows in B indicate myo1e localization to lamellipodia, arrows in D indicate colocalization of myo1e and clathrin on endocytic vesicles. Scale bar: 10 µm.

Lifeact, a 17 amino acid-long peptide derived from a budding yeast actin filament-binding protein ABP140 [Riedl et al. 2008], is a good marker of the dynamic actin cytoskeletal structures since it does not interfere with actin assembly and disassembly [Riedl et al. 2010]. Using adenovirally encoded mCherry-Lifeact, we were able to visualize F-actin in live podocytes (Figure 3D, Figure 4E–F). Since Lifeact is also a good marker of actin-containing cortical structures, we were able to readily track the forward movement of the leading edge (Figure 4G kymograph).

Figure 4. Visualization of podocyte cytoskeletal dynamics using live-cell imaging.

Figure 4

Differentiated mouse podocytes were infected with either mCherry-tagged synaptopodin (A–D, confocal images) or mCherry-tagged Lifeact (E–G, epifluorescence images). B and C, enlarged images of the boxed regions in A at the indicated time points. Arrow in B points to a synaptopodin-labeled structure undergoing retrograde flow away from the cell edge. Arrows in C, pointing to synaptopodin speckles within stress fibers, illustrate stress fiber contraction (decreasing distance between the arrows over time). D, kymographs generated using red lines in B illustrate retrograde flow of synaptopodin-labeled actin bundles. F, a time-lapse sequence showing enlarged images of the boxed region in E. G, kymograph generated based on the time-lapse sequence shown in F illustrates protrusion of the cell edge. Scale bar: 10 µm.

Synaptopodin, an actin-binding protein, is an important regulator of the podocyte actin cytoskeleton [Asanuma et al. 2005; Asanuma et al. 2006; Deller et al. 2003; Faul et al. 2008; Mundel et al. 1997a]. mCherry-synaptopodin decorated actin stress fibers in podocytes, forming a characteristic punctate pattern reminiscent of myofibrils (Figure 3C). The localization of mCherry-synaptopodin was similar to that of the endogenous synaptopodin, as revealed by immunostaining (Figure 3C’). Because synaptopodin creates a discontinuous, speckle-like pattern of actin labeling, it can be used to trace contraction and lateral movements of stress fibers. Figure 4 (A–C) shows confocal images of live podocytes infected with adenovirus encoding mCherry-synaptopodin. Individual frames from a time-lapse movie of mCherry-labeled synaptopodin are shown in Figure 4 (B and C). Individual synaptopodin spots (arrow in 4B) underwent retrograde flow away from the cell edge, which is characteristic of actin-containing structures. Examples of retrograde flow of synaptopodin spots are shown using kymographs (Figure 4D). The rate of retrograde flow measured from the kymographs of synaptopodin spots (0.38 +/− 0.24 µm/min, N=4 cells) was similar to the relatively slow rate of retrograde actin flow observed in some fibroblast cell lines [Theriot and Mitchison 1992]. Synaptopodin labeling also allowed visualization of actin stress fiber contraction (Figure 4C). When paired with GFP-tagged myo1e, synaptopodin can be used to visualize stress fibers while myo1e highlights the cell edge and is enriched in lamellipodia (Figure 5).

Clathrin plays a key role in endocytosis, which is important for podocyte functions [Soda et al. 2012]. Transient expression of fluorescently labeled clathrin light chain using DNA transfection of cell lines such as Cos-7 often results in overexpression and loss of vesicular localization, based on our experience (data not shown). When using an adenoviral vector to introduce clathrin light chain into podocytes, overexpression of clathrin light chain was rarely observed, allowing successful imaging of endocytic vesicles. In Figure 3E’, clathrin coated endocytic vesicles can be easily visualized. Figure 5 C–D also show the colocalization of clathrin (red) and myo1e (green) in endocytic vesicles (arrows).

ZO-1 is an actin-associated protein and an important component of the glomerular slit diaphragm [Reiser et al. 2000; Schnabel et al. 1990]. We have previously shown that ZO-1 interacts with myo1e [Bi et al. 2013]. Induction of proteinuria in rats by an injection of the anti-nephrin antibody coincides with the loss of ZO-1 expression, indicating that ZO-1 and other slit diaphragm adaptor proteins may play important roles in maintaining glomerular filtration barrier integrity [Kawachi et al. 1997]. Therefore, we decided to examine localization of ZO-1 as a marker of cell-cell junctions. In Figure 3F, mCherry tagged ZO-1 localizes to the cell-cell contacts between podocytes (arrows).

Discussion

Imaging of podocyte cytoskeletal organization and dynamics can provide valuable insights into the functioning of the molecular machinery responsible for the complex architecture of the glomerular filtration barrier. Introduction of conditionally immortalized podocyte cell lines represented a key advancement in the ability to study podocyte cell biology in vitro [Shankland et al. 2007]. Following the development of podocyte cell lines, live imaging of podocyte cytoskeletal structures has been used to characterize such dynamic processes as formation of actin-containing protrusions [Akilesh et al. 2011], actin cytoskeletal reorganization in response to the treatment with growth factors and serum components [Endlich et al. 2009; Lennon et al. 2008], contraction of stress fibers and reorganization of focal adhesions [Endlich et al. 2009], and movement and internalization of endocytic vesicles and endosomal compartments associated with actin and other cytoskeletal proteins [Soda et al. 2012; Welsch et al. 2005]. Fluorescently labeled cytoskeletal proteins have also been utilized for measurements of protein turnover in podocytes by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) [Endlich et al. 2009].

Since transient transfection of podocytes is characterized by relatively low efficiency, the use of viral transduction for expression of fluorescently tagged proteins represents a promising technique for the studies of podocyte cell biology. Both lentiviral and adenoviral vectors have been used for podocyte transduction. The lentiviral and retroviral vectors are able to integrate into the host cell genome, resulting in stable transfection. This property is beneficial for the production of stable cell lines but could also result in insertional mutagenesis by disrupting or activating host cell genes. On the other hand, adenoviral vectors offer a highly efficient system for short-term protein expression, without the likelihood of disrupting endogenous gene expression.

Adenoviruses have been reported to cause changes in the cytoskeletal organization of host cells upon infection, due to activation of a number of cell signaling pathways [Taylor et al. 2011]. These effects of adenoviruses have been mapped primarily to the genes located in the E1 region [Jackson and Bellett 1985]. The E1 region has been removed from the adenoviruses engineered for use in laboratory studies, such as those produced using the AdEasy system. Removal of the E1 region renders adenovirus replication-incompetent so that infectious adenoviral particles can be produced only in special packaging cells, such as HEK-293, which supply the E1 gene products. This modification not only increases the safety of adenoviral vectors but also reduces the chances of adenoviral infection causing significant reorganization of the host cell cytoskeleton. However, even in the case of replication–incompetent adenoviral vectors, internalization of the virus may induce activation of PI-3-kinase and Rho GTPases [Li et al. 1998], which may, in turn, modulate cytoskeletal organization. Therefore, in every experiment using adenoviral vectors, a possibility of the viral infection inducing changes in the actin organization should be considered, and careful use of controls (such as infecting cells with an empty adenoviral vector and comparing localization of proteins of interest in infected and non-infected cells) may be advisable.

Recent advancements in the field of podocyte biology include development of the techniques that allow fluorescent labeling of glomerular podocytes in vivo using transgenic mice [Grgic et al. 2012; Hohne et al. 2013] and zebrafish [He et al. 2011] that express genetically encoded fluorescent labels in a podocyte-specific manner. In future studies, these cell type-specific fluorescent labels can be combined with the intravital imaging of renal glomeruli by multi-photon microscopy [Peti-Peterdi and Sipos 2010] to allow the direct observation of dynamic rearrangements of podocyte foot processes and changes in glomerular permeability in vivo.

Development of the techniques that allow efficient labeling of podocytes with specific fluorescent markers would further broaden the toolkit of the researchers interested in the cell biology of podocytes and allow the dissection of molecular pathways leading to the development of glomerular disorders. As described in this paper, adenoviral vectors encoding fluorescently tagged cytoskeletal proteins provide another valuable tool that can be used to analyze podocyte cytoskeletal dynamics. Our study shows that adenoviral vectors can be used to introduce fluorescently tagged cytoskeletal markers into differentiated cultured podocytes with high efficiency and low toxicity. Viral concentration and infection time can be adjusted to regulate the level of overexpression of the protein of interest, and multiple fluorescent markers can be combined in the same cell. In the future, this technique may be adapted to allow fluorescent labeling of podocytes in vivo for intravital imaging of glomerular dynamics.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Peter Mundel for generously sharing podocyte cell line and synaptopodin constructs and for his expert advice on podocyte biology and cell culture techniques. The authors are also grateful for help and advice on working with podocytes provided by Christian Faul, Kirk Campbell, and Michelle Rheault. The authors thank Alan Fanning for providing ZO-1 constructs and Pietro De Camilli and Roberto Zoncu for sharing clathrin light chain construct.

This work was supported by the NIH/NIDDK award R01DK083345 to MK. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Abbreviations

ABM

antibiotic-antimycotic

CVL

crude viral lysate

FBS

Fetal Bovine Serum

FRAP

fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

MTT

methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide

PFU

plaque forming units

References

  1. Akilesh S, Suleiman H, Yu H, Stander MC, Lavin P, Gbadegesin R, Antignac C, Pollak M, Kopp JB, Winn MP, et al. Arhgap24 inactivates Rac1 in mouse podocytes, and a mutant form is associated with familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(10):4127–4137. doi: 10.1172/JCI46458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Hamed MH, Al-Sabban E, Al-Mojalli H, Al-Harbi N, Faqeih E, Al Shaya H, Alhasan K, Al-Hissi S, Rajab M, Edwards N, et al. A molecular genetic analysis of childhood nephrotic syndrome in a cohort of Saudi Arabian families. J Hum Genet. 2013 doi: 10.1038/jhg.2013.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asanuma K, Kim K, Oh J, Giardino L, Chabanis S, Faul C, Reiser J, Mundel P. Synaptopodin regulates the actin-bundling activity of alpha-actinin in an isoform-specific manner. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(5):1188–1198. doi: 10.1172/JCI23371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Asanuma K, Yanagida-Asanuma E, Faul C, Tomino Y, Kim K, Mundel P. Synaptopodin orchestrates actin organization and cell motility via regulation of RhoA signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(5):485–491. doi: 10.1038/ncb1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bi J, Chase SE, Pellenz CD, Kurihara H, Fanning AS, Krendel M. Myosin 1e is a component of the glomerular slit diaphragm complex that regulates actin reorganization during cell-cell contact formation in podocytes. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;305(4):F532–F544. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00223.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown EJ, Schlondorff JS, Becker DJ, Tsukaguchi H, Uscinski AL, Higgs HN, Henderson JM, Pollak MR. Mutations in the formin gene INF2 cause focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet. 2010;42(1):72–76. doi: 10.1038/ng.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chase SE, Encina CV, Stolzenburg LR, Tatum AH, Holzman LB, Krendel M. Podocyte-specific knockout of myosin 1e disrupts glomerular filtration. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012;303(7):F1099–F1106. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00251.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng J, Grassart A, Drubin DG. Myosin 1E coordinates actin assembly and cargo trafficking during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23(15):2891–2904. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-04-0383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deller T, Korte M, Chabanis S, Drakew A, Schwegler H, Stefani GG, Zuniga A, Schwarz K, Bonhoeffer T, Zeller R, et al. Synaptopodin-deficient mice lack a spine apparatus and show deficits in synaptic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(18):10494–10499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1832384100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Endlich N, Schordan E, Cohen CD, Kretzler M, Lewko B, Welsch T, Kriz W, Otey CA, Endlich K. Palladin is a dynamic actin-associated protein in podocytes. Kidney Int. 2009;75(2):214–226. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Faul C, Asanuma K, Yanagida-Asanuma E, Kim K, Mundel P. Actin up: regulation of podocyte structure and function by components of the actin cytoskeleton. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17(9):428–437. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Faul C, Donnelly M, Merscher-Gomez S, Chang YH, Franz S, Delfgaauw J, Chang JM, Choi HY, Campbell KN, Kim K, et al. The actin cytoskeleton of kidney podocytes is a direct target of the antiproteinuric effect of cyclosporine A. Nat Med. 2008;14(9):931–938. doi: 10.1038/nm.1857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Greka A, Mundel P. Cell biology and pathology of podocytes. Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:299–323. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grgic I, Brooks CR, Hofmeister AF, Bijol V, Bonventre JV, Humphreys BD. Imaging of podocyte foot processes by fluorescence microscopy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(5):785–791. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011100988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. He B, Ebarasi L, Hultenby K, Tryggvason K, Betsholtz C. Podocin-green fluorescence protein allows visualization and functional analysis of podocytes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(6):1019–1023. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010121291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hohne M, Ising C, Hagmann H, Volker LA, Brahler S, Schermer B, Brinkkoetter PT, Benzing T. Light microscopic visualization of podocyte ultrastructure demonstrates oscillating glomerular contractions. Am J Pathol. 2013;182(2):332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jackson P, Bellett AJ. Reduced microfilament organization in adenovirus type 5-infected rat embryo cells: a function of early region 1a. J Virol. 1985;55(3):644–650. doi: 10.1128/jvi.55.3.644-650.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jat PS, Noble MD, Ataliotis P, Tanaka Y, Yannoutsos N, Larsen L, Kioussis D. Direct derivation of conditionally immortal cell lines from an H-2Kb-tsA58 transgenic mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(12):5096–5100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaplan JM, Kim SH, North KN, Rennke H, Correia LA, Tong HQ, Mathis BJ, Rodriguez-Perez JC, Allen PG, Beggs AH, et al. Mutations in ACTN4, encoding alpha-actinin-4, cause familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet. 2000;24(3):251–256. doi: 10.1038/73456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Katsuya K, Yaoita E, Yoshida Y, Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto T. An improved method for primary culture of rat podocytes. Kidney Int. 2006;69(11):2101–2106. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaufman L, Yang G, Hayashi K, Ashby JR, Huang L, Ross MJ, Klotman ME, Klotman PE. The homophilic adhesion molecule sidekick-1 contributes to augmented podocyte aggregation in HIV-associated nephropathy. FASEB J. 2007;21(7):1367–1375. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7191com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kawachi H, Kurihara H, Topham PS, Brown D, Shia MA, Orikasa M, Shimizu F, Salant DJ. Slit diaphragm-reactive nephritogenic MAb 5-1-6 alters expression of ZO-1 in rat podocytes. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(6 Pt 2):F984–F993. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1997.273.6.F984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim JM, Wu H, Green G, Winkler CA, Kopp JB, Miner JH, Unanue ER, Shaw AS. CD2-associated protein haploinsufficiency is linked to glomerular disease susceptibility. Science. 2003;300(5623):1298–1300. doi: 10.1126/science.1081068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Krendel M, Osterweil EK, Mooseker MS. Myosin 1E interacts with synaptojanin-1 and dynamin and is involved in endocytosis. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(4):644–650. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lennon R, Singh A, Welsh GI, Coward RJ, Satchell S, Ni L, Mathieson PW, Bakker WW, Saleem MA. Hemopexin induces nephrin-dependent reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in podocytes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(11):2140–2149. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007080940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li E, Stupack D, Bokoch GM, Nemerow GR. Adenovirus endocytosis requires actin cytoskeleton reorganization mediated by Rho family GTPases. J Virol. 1998;72(11):8806–8812. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.11.8806-8812.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mathieson PW. The podocyte as a target for therapies--new and old. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8(1):52–56. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mele C, Iatropoulos P, Donadelli R, Calabria A, Maranta R, Cassis P, Buelli S, Tomasoni S, Piras R, Krendel M, et al. MYO1E mutations and childhood familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(4):295–306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1101273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Michaud JL, Hosseini-Abardeh M, Farah K, Kennedy CR. Modulating alpha-actinin-4 dynamics in podocytes. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2009;66(3):166–178. doi: 10.1002/cm.20339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mundel P, Heid HW, Mundel TM, Kruger M, Reiser J, Kriz W. Synaptopodin: an actin-associated protein in telencephalic dendrites and renal podocytes. J Cell Biol. 1997a;139(1):193–204. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.1.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mundel P, Reiser J. Proteinuria: an enzymatic disease of the podocyte? Kidney Int. 2010;77(7):571–580. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mundel P, Reiser J, Zuniga Mejia Borja A, Pavenstadt H, Davidson GR, Kriz W, Zeller R. Rearrangements of the cytoskeleton and cell contacts induce process formation during differentiation of conditionally immortalized mouse podocyte cell lines. Exp Cell Res. 1997b;236(1):248–258. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ni L, Saleem M, Mathieson PW. Podocyte culture: tricks of the trade. Nephrology (Carlton) 2012;17(6):525–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pavenstadt H, Kriz W, Kretzler M. Cell biology of the glomerular podocyte. Physiol Rev. 2003;83(1):253–307. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00020.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Peti-Peterdi J, Sipos A. A high-powered view of the filtration barrier. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(11):1835–1841. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010040378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Reiser J, Kriz W, Kretzler M, Mundel P. The glomerular slit diaphragm is a modified adherens junction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reiser J, Sever S. Podocyte biology and pathogenesis of kidney disease. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:357–366. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-050311-163340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reiser J, von Gersdorff G, Loos M, Oh J, Asanuma K, Giardino L, Rastaldi MP, Calvaresi N, Watanabe H, Schwarz K, et al. Induction of B7-1 in podocytes is associated with nephrotic syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(10):1390–1397. doi: 10.1172/JCI20402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Riedl J, Crevenna AH, Kessenbrock K, Yu JH, Neukirchen D, Bista M, Bradke F, Jenne D, Holak TA, Werb Z, et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nat Methods. 2008;5(7):605–607. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Riedl J, Flynn KC, Raducanu A, Gartner F, Beck G, Bosl M, Bradke F, Massberg S, Aszodi A, Sixt M, et al. Lifeact mice for studying F-actin dynamics. Nat Methods. 2010;7(3):168–169. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0310-168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Saleem MA, O'Hare MJ, Reiser J, Coward RJ, Inward CD, Farren T, Xing CY, Ni L, Mathieson PW, Mundel P. A conditionally immortalized human podocyte cell line demonstrating nephrin and podocin expression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(3):630–638. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V133630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sanna-Cherchi S, Burgess KE, Nees SN, Caridi G, Weng PL, Dagnino M, Bodria M, Carrea A, Allegretta MA, Kim HR, et al. Exome sequencing identified MYO1E and NEIL1 as candidate genes for human autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2011;80(4):389–396. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schiwek D, Endlich N, Holzman L, Holthofer H, Kriz W, Endlich K. Stable expression of nephrin and localization to cell-cell contacts in novel murine podocyte cell lines. Kidney Int. 2004;66(1):91–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00711.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schnabel E, Anderson JM, Farquhar MG. The tight junction protein ZO-1 is concentrated along slit diaphragms of the glomerular epithelium. J Cell Biol. 1990;111(3):1255–1263. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.3.1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shankland SJ, Pippin JW, Reiser J, Mundel P. Podocytes in culture: past, present, and future. Kidney Int. 2007;72(1):26–36. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Soda K, Balkin DM, Ferguson SM, Paradise S, Milosevic I, Giovedi S, Volpicelli-Daley L, Tian X, Wu Y, Ma H, et al. Role of dynamin, synaptojanin, and endophilin in podocyte foot processes. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(12):4401–4411. doi: 10.1172/JCI65289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Taylor MP, Koyuncu OO, Enquist LW. Subversion of the actin cytoskeleton during viral infection. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(6):427–439. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Theriot JA, Mitchison TJ. Comparison of actin and cell surface dynamics in motile fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1992;119(2):367–377. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.2.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Welsch T, Endlich N, Gokce G, Doroshenko E, Simpson JC, Kriz W, Shaw AS, Endlich K. Association of CD2AP with dynamic actin on vesicles in podocytes. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;289(5):F1134–F1143. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00178.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Welsh GI, Saleem MA. The podocyte cytoskeleton--key to a functioning glomerulus in health and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8(1):14–21. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES