Abstract
Nanofibre forming peptide amphiphiles were conjugated to naproxen through an esterase-sensitive linker. The amount of naproxen released, in the presence of enzymes, was influenced by the linker conjugating the drug to the supramolecular assembly. In vitro studies showed the anti-inflammatory activity of the released drug was maintained.
Over the past few years various types of nanocarriers have been developed to achieve controlled drug release in response to external stimuli such as pH, temperature, light, or enzymes.1–4 These strategies can minimize the limitations of small molecule therapies including metabolism to inactive products and side effects.5, 6 Bioactive supramolecular nanostructures based on peptide amphiphiles (PAs) are a versatile platform for the delivery of small molecules. PAs are composed of natural amino acid sequences covalently conjugated to hydrophobic segments. These molecules can self-assemble in aqueous solutions into high-aspect-ratio nanostructures, such as fibers and ribbons, with their hydrophobic segments packed away from the aqueous interface.7–9 The peptide domain near the hydrophobic core can be varied to tune the supramolecular cohesion of the nanostructures.10 PAs can be functionalized to display on the surfaces of the nanostructures bioactive cues for cell signalling and targeting.11–13 Recently, PAs have been used as drug delivery systems by covalently attaching small molecules containing a ketone functionality via a pH-labile hydrazone linkage.14, 15 In a similar approach, Cui and co-workers conjugated camptothecin (CPT) to a glutathione-responsive disulphylbutyrate linker and attached it to a peptide domain. This approach places the CPT segments as the hydrophobic core of the nanostructure. Under tumor-relevant conditions, these nanostructures exhibited in vitro efficacy against cancer cell lines.16
The previous examples, hydrazine-PA and disulphylbutyrate-PA nanofibres, are useful platforms to deliver either ketone- or alcohol-containing therapeutic agents. However, these strategies cannot be extended to the large family of drugs with an acidic functionality, including atorvastatin (Lipitor®), pregabalin (Lyrica®), and Lev ofloxacin (Levaquin®). Naproxen is an acid-bearing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug used to treat osteoarthritis,17 rheumatoid arthritis,18 and cancer.19 We report here the development of a peptide-based supramolecular nanostructure bearing sensitive naproxen-ester linkers for enzyme-triggered release. Enzymatic drug release is attractive because it does not require an external stimulus and can be tailored to diseases expressing specific enzymes.20
Esterases are ubiquitous enzymes found in the body with varying degrees of specificity.21 Many esterases, such as human carboxylesterase and porcine liver esterase (PLE),22 present the conserved catalytic triad sequence SHE deep inside the protein,23 around 19 Å from the surface (Fig. S1). Thus, any nanofibre-drug conjugate must have a linker long enough to access the catalytic site to be hydrolysed by the enzyme. Scheme 1 shows the synthesis of the PA-naproxen conjugate 3 (32.5 Å from ester bond to the PA core, linker in red, naproxen in blue, also Fig. S2). In addition, we prepared PAs 4 and 5, with linkers of with a 19.4 Å or 11.6 Å extended length, respectively, to study their differences in enzymatic hydrolysis (Scheme 2). Such molecular design allows the presentation of the naproxen-ester derivatives on the surface of the nanofibres, where we expect greater conformational degrees of freedom relative to the hydrophobic core for optimal esterase accessibility.24, 25
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of PA- naproxen conjugate 3. i. PyBOP, DIPEA, DME, DCM; ii. TFA, TIPS, H2O
Scheme 2.
Structures of PA-naproxen conjugates 4 and 5
We also synthesized C16-V3A3E3 (E3)26 PA with the same V3A3 β-sheet-forming domain to dilute the drug-conjugated PAs 3–5 within the supramolecular nanofibres. In previous investigations, we have found that reducing the surface density of bioactive PAs on the nanofibres by mixing with diluent PAs promoted enhanced biological responses in vitro and in vivo27–29 In this work we co-assembled the naproxen-conjugated PAs with PA E3 at 1:3 ratio (a higher proportion of the drug-conjugated PAs resulted in poor water solubility). After co-assembly, cryogenic transmission electron microscopy micrographs revealed the formation of nanofibres (Fig. 1 and Fig. S3). As previously reported, one-dimensional micron-long nanofibres are typical of the C16-V3A3E3 sequence.26, 28 In addition, circular dichroism of the same systems indicated the presence of β-sheets (Fig. S4).
Figure 1.
Representative cryogenic transmission electron micrograph of 1:3 molar mixtures of PA 3 with E3 PA (a). Molecular graphics representation of a nanofibre assembled from PA 3 with E3 PA in 1:3 molar ratio (b).
To evaluate the stability of the ester linkage, we first investigated base-promoted hydrolysis of the PA-ester conjugates 3 diluted with a filler PA E3 (1:3 molar ratio) at different pH values: 7.4, 9.0 and 12.0. The PA-ester conjugate exhibited chemical stability towards hydrolysis at pH 7.4, with only 2.8 ± 2.3% of Naproxen released after 7 d (Fig. S5). The stability of the ester bond on the PAs at physiological pH was comparable to previously reported polymeric systems containing either ibuprofen or naproxen.2, 30 At higher pH, the ester linker was hydrolysed to a much greater extent with increased drug release: 22 ± 4% at pH 9 and 76 ± 5% at pH 12 after 7 d.
In order to evaluate enzymatic hydrolysis, PA 3 was diluted with PA E3 (1:3 molar ratio) and incubated in PBS (pH 7.4) with porcine liver esterase (PLE) at 20 U mL−1, a physiologically relevant dose.31 Fig. 2A shows the HPLC trace of PA 3 before and after the addition of PLE. The peaks were identified by mass spectrometry as naproxen (11.8 min), PA E3 (14.6 min), hydrolysed PA 3 (15.6 min), and non-hydrolysed PA 3 (17.3 min). Naproxen release from PA 3 was 50 ± 4% after 5 h and 56 ± 2% after 24 h (Fig. 2b) with no substantial release at later time points. This result indicated that PA 3, which is stable in PBS at physiological pH, can be enzymatically cleaved to release the drug. However, we did not observe complete hydrolysis, as evidenced by the presence of non-hydrolysed PA 3 in the HPLC trace. Interestingly, we found that introducing additional PLE (10 U mL−1) after 24 h only increased naproxen hydrolysis to 61 ± 3% (Fig. S6). In addition, when PA 3- PA E3 (1:3 molar ratio) was incubated 24 h with varied amounts of PLE, we did not find a substantial difference in hydrolysis between 5 and 20 U mL−1 of the enzyme (Fig. S7). Since epitope crowding on the nanofibre surface has been shown to decrease interactions with proteins,27–29 we postulate that the 25% dilution of the drug-conjugated PA was too high for optimal esterase accessibility. To test our hypothesis, we incubated the PEG3-Naproxen ligand 2 in the presence of PLE (20 U mL−1) with and without PA E3 at 1:3 molar ratio to keep the same concentrations of the earlier experiments (Fig. S8). In both cases we observed complete hydrolysis of the ester after 1 d, which implies that the PLE activity was not disrupted when ligand 2 is not tethered to the nanostructures. Next, a further dilution of PA 3 from 25% to 10% by PA E3 exhibited a 15% increase in enzymatic hydrolysis (Fig. S9), which suggests that naproxen crowding was an important factor for incomplete hydrolysis. Furthermore, when naproxen-conjugated PAs are co-assembled with PA E3, it is possible that some naproxen is buried in the hydrophobic parts of the nanofibre, which can also diminish the percentage of hydrolysis. Nonetheless, we have observed here that modification of monomer ratio allows the tuning of drug release from these supramolecular nanostructures.
Figure 2.
(a) Overlap of PA 3- PA E3 (1:3 molar ratio, 1 mM final concentration) before (black) and after (red),addition of PLE (20 U/mL) at pH 7.4, 60 rpm and 37 °C, 1 day. (b) Naproxen release as a function of time from PAs 3, 4 and 5 with PA E3 (1:3 molar ratio) in the presence of PLE (20 U/mL) at pH 7.4, 60 rpm and 37 °C.
The effect of linker length on enzymatic hydrolysis was evaluated using PAs 4–5 (Fig. 2). These PAs were diluted with PA E3 (1:3 molar ratio) and treated with PLE at 20 U mL−1. After 24 h, naproxen release from PA 4 was 36 ± 4%, approximately 20% lower than that from PA 3. PA 5 exhibited the least amount of drug release after 24 h (6 ± 1 %). Even after 48 h incubation, there was minimal release from PA 5 (7 ± 2). Since esterases require entry of the substrate into their catalytic pockets, it is possible that the longer linker diminished the steric hindrance of nanofibres to enzyme action, allowing easier access of the naproxen conjugate to the PLE-catalytic site. This is in agreement with previous findings that showed bioactive cues were more functional when they were separated from the bulk scaffold via molecular linkages.32 Moreover, D’Emanuele and co-workers have reported that the enzymatic hydrolysis of non-assembling dendrimers containing ester-naproxen conjugates increases with longer linkages.33
The anti-inflammatory activity of the hydrolysed naproxen was evaluated using a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor assay.34 COX enzymes promote the synthesis of prostaglandins, which are key mediators in inflammation, pain, and other diseases.35 For COX-2 inhibition, it is important that the drug is hydrolysed to a carboxylic acid to promote electrostatic interactions with the residues on the active site.36 PA 3, which exhibited the fastest hydrolysis, was diluted with PA E3 (1:3 molar ratio) and incubated with or without 20 U mL−1 of PLE for 24 h at 37 °C. The collected supernatant was indeed able to inhibit COX-2-activity by 70% (Fig. S10). In addition, we evaluated biocompatibility of this system and did not observe cytotoxicity in mouse mesenchymal stem cells (Fig. S11).
We have shown here that drugs containing carboxylic acid functionalities can be conjugated to PAs though an ester linkage for controlled drug release. The PA-naproxen conjugate nanofibre exhibited stability at physiological pH and temperature, which will be advantageous for long term storage. Enzymatic hydrolysis of PAs shows improved released kinetics with increased spacing between the drug and the PA backbone, likely due to increase enzyme access to the ester linkage. The acid functionality of naproxen is unaltered upon enzymatic action and its bioactivity is preserved as shown by the COX-2 inhibitory assay. The biocompatible nature of the supramolecular assemblies make them ideal platforms for drug delivery applications. In clinical settings, we propose that the naproxen-conjugated nanofibres may be systemically delivered for cancer therapy, or locally injected to form a gel network in situ to treat osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, the chemistry reported here can be applied to many other drugs containing carboxylic acids. Since the lipid tail and β-sheet regions of the PA are unaltered, it is expected that the self-assembled scaffold will be conserved upon release. Therefore, this supramolecular design makes it possible to encapsulate drugs37 or integrate different types of PA monomers into the same nanostructure, allowing sequential release of drugs.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health NIDCR (grant 2R01DE015920-09) and NIBIB (5R01EB003806-09). S.S.L. is supported by Samsung Scholarship Foundation Graduate Fellowship. We acknowledge the following Northwestern University facilities: Peptide Synthesis Core at the Simpson Querrey Institute for BioNanotechnology; Integrated Molecular Structure Education and Research Center (IMSERC, NSF CHE-9871268 and NSF CHE-0923236). The authors acknowledge Dr. Liam Palmer, Dr. Mark Karver, and Dr. Amanda Worthy for reviewing the manuscript and scientific advice.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Full experimental details and characterization data on new compounds, CryoTEM, CD, 1H and 13C NMR, HPLC and LC-MS traces. See DOI: 10.1039/c000000x/
Notes and references
- 1.Bae Y, Fukushima S, Harada A, Kataoka K. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2003;42:4640. doi: 10.1002/anie.200250653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hasegawa U, van der Vlies AJ, Wandrey C, Hubbell JA. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:3314. doi: 10.1021/bm4009149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xiao ZY, Ji CW, Shi JJ, Pridgen EM, Frieder J, Wu J, Farokhzad OC. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2012;51:11853. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Al-Ahmady ZS, Al-Jamal WT, Bossche JV, Bui TT, Drake AF, Mason AJ, Kostarelos K. ACS nano. 2012;6:9335. doi: 10.1021/nn302148p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu YS, Coumar MS, Chang JY, Sun HY, Kuo FM, Kuo CC, Chen YJ, Chang CY, Hsiao CL, Liou JP, Chen CP, Yao HT, Chiang YK, Tan UK, Chen CT, Chu CY, Wu SY, Yeh TK, Lin CY, Hsieh HP. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:4941. doi: 10.1021/jm900060s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Widakowich C, de Castro G, Jr, de Azambuja E, Dinh P, Awada A. The Oncologist. 2007;12:1443. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-12-1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI. Science. 2001;294:1684. doi: 10.1126/science.1063187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99:5133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072699999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cui H, Muraoka T, Cheetham AG, Stupp SI. Nano Lett. 2009;9:945. doi: 10.1021/nl802813f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Newcomb CJ, Sur S, Ortony JH, Lee OS, Matson JB, Boekhoven J, Yu JM, Schatz GC, Stupp SI. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3321. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Silva GA, Czeisler C, Niece KL, Beniash E, Harrington DA, Kessler JA, Stupp SI. Science. 2004;303:1352. doi: 10.1126/science.1093783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Webber MJ, Tongers J, Newcomb CJ, Marquardt KT, Bauersachs J, Losordo DW, Stupp SI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011;108:13438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016546108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mlinar LB, Chung EJ, Wonder EA, Tirrell M. Biomaterials. 2014;35:8678. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Webber MJ, Matson JB, Tamboli VK, Stupp SI. Biomaterials. 2012;33:6823. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matson JB, Stupp SI. Chem. Commum. 2011;47:7962. doi: 10.1039/c1cc12570b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cheetham AG, Zhang P, Lin YA, Lock LL, Cui H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:2907. doi: 10.1021/ja3115983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Svensson O, Malmenas M, Fajutrao L, Roos EM, Lohmander LS. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006;65:781. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.040519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eijsbouts AMM, Kempers MJE, van den Hoogen FHJ, Laan RFJM, Hermus ARMM, Ross HA, Sweep FCGJ, van de Putte LBA. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2011;29:35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yao M, Zhou W, Sangha S, Albert A, Chang AJ, Liu TC, Wolfe MM. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:1618. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Andresen TL, Thompson DH, Kaasgaard T. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2010;27:353. doi: 10.3109/09687688.2010.515950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hatfield JM, Wierdl M, Wadkins RM, Potter PM. Expert Opin. Drug Met. 2008;4:1153. doi: 10.1517/17425255.4.9.1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hasenpusch D, Bornscheuer UT, Langel W. J. Mol. Model. 2011;17:1493. doi: 10.1007/s00894-010-0846-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bencharit S, Edwards CC, Morton CL, Howard-Williams EL, Kuhn P, Potter PM, Redinbo MR. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;363:201. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Matson JB, Newcomb CJ, Bitton R, Stupp SI. Soft Matter. 2012;8:3586. doi: 10.1039/C2SM07420F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ortony JH, Newcomb CJ, Matson JB, Palmer LC, Doan PE, Hoffman BM, Stupp SI. Nat. Mater. 2014;13:812. doi: 10.1038/nmat3979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pashuck ET, Cui HG, Stupp SI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:6041. doi: 10.1021/ja908560n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Webber MJ, Tongers J, Renault MA, Roncalli JG, Losordo DW, Stupp SI. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee SS, Hsu EL, Mendoza M, Ghodasra J, Nickoli MS, Ashtekar A, Polavarapu M, Babu J, Riaz RM, Nicolas JD, Nelson D, Hashmi SZ, Kaltz SR, Earhart JS, Merk BR, McKee JS, Bairstow SF, Shah RN, Hsu WK, Stupp SI. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2014:452. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201400129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shah RN, Shah NA, Del Rosario Lim MM, Hsieh C, Nuber G, Stupp SI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:3293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906501107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rosario-Melendez R, Yu WL, Uhrich KE. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:3542. doi: 10.1021/bm400889a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tsujita T, Okuda H. Eur. J. Biochem. 1983;133:215. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07450.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Taraballi F, Natalello A, Campione M, Villa O, Doglia SM, Paleari A, Gelain F. Front. Neuroeng. 2010;3:1. doi: 10.3389/neuro.16.001.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Najlah M, Freeman S, Attwood D, D'Emanuele A. Int. J. Pharm. 2007;336:183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tsai WJ, Shiao YJ, Lin SJ, Chiou WF, Lin LC, Yang TH, Teng CM, Wu TS, Yang LM. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006;16:4440. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McAdam BF, Catella-Lawson F, Mardini IA, Kapoor S, Lawson JA, FitzGerald GA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999;96:272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.1.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Duggan KC, Walters MJ, Musee J, Harp JM, Kiefer JR, Oates JA, Marnett LJ. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:34950. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.162982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Soukasene S, Toft DJ, Moyer TJ, Lu H, Lee HK, Standley SM, Cryns VL, Stupp SI. ACS Nano. 2011;5:9113. doi: 10.1021/nn203343z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




