Skip to main content
African Journal of Traditional, Complementary, and Alternative Medicines logoLink to African Journal of Traditional, Complementary, and Alternative Medicines
. 2014 Apr 3;11(3):70–75. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v11i3.10

Volatiles of Lysimachia Paridiformis Var. Stenophylla, Lysimachia Fortumei and Lysimachia Chikungensis by HS-SPME-GC-MS

Jin-Feng Wei 1,2, Zhen-hua Yin 1, Wen-Yi Kang 1,
PMCID: PMC4202421  PMID: 25371565

Abstract

Background

Lysimachia paridiformis Var. Stenophylla mainly contain flavonoid constituents. Flavonoids and benzoquinones are the main compounds in L. fortumei Maxim. The objective of this paper was to study the volatile compounds of leaves in L. paridiformis Var. Stenophylla, L. fortumei and L. chikungensis for the first time.

Materials and Methods

Volatiles were extracted by the manual solid phase micro-extraction (SPME). The volatile constituents were analyzed by an Agilent 6890 N gas chromatograph equipped and coupled with a 5975B mass selective detector spectrometer.

Results

Twenty-nine compounds were identified in the leaves of L. paridiformis var. Stenophylla, accounting for 89.17% of the total volatile fraction. The main constituents were ethanol (13.58%), and β-ionone (8.05%). linalool and β-ionone were the main aroma constituents in L. paridiformis var. Stenophylla. Twenty-one compounds were identified in the leaves of L. fortumei, accounting for 94.72% of the total volatile fraction. The main constituents were tricosane (14.72%), docosane (11.02%), tetracosane (10.77%) and pentacosane (9.81%). Thirty-two compounds were identified in the leaves of L. chikungensis, accounting for 88.58% of the total volatile fraction. Typical compounds detected in L. chikungensis were cis-3-hexenyl pentanoate (13.33%), followed by ethanol (12.13%), ethyl palmitate (7.78%), and heneicosane (5.38%).

Conclusion

The results showed that the main composition types were similar in the three plants, but the content was different, which indicated that the similar composition types provided the same medical effect for three plants.

Keywords: Lysimachia paridiformis Var. Stenophylla, Lysimachia fortumei, Lysimachia chikungensis, solid phase microextraction, GC-MS, volatiles

Introduction

Lysimachia paridiformis var. stenophylla (Myrsinaceae), the variety of L. paridiformis Franch, is much more widely distributed than the type variety. The whole plant was also called “Zhui Fengsan” used in Chinese folk medicine against rheumatic arthralgia, hemiparalysis, pedoinfantile convulsion and bone fracture. Phytochemical research showed that flavonoids as the main components were accumulated in L. paridiformis var. stenophylla (Li and Xiang, 2010). L. fortumei Maxim, as an erect perennial herb distributed in Japan, Korea, southeast China and Taiwan. The whole plants have been used in Chinese folk medicine for activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis and dissipating dampness. Phytochemical research showed that flavonoids and benzoquinones are the main compounds (Huang et al., 2007; Fang et al., 1989). L. chikungensis, an endemic plant in China, is a perennial plant and is mainly distributed in rock crevices and grassy mountain slopes in Henan and Hubei Province in China, and is grown in Guizhou Province.

Extraction methods for volatiles include solvent extraction, steam distillation, pressing, chromatography, grease separation and carbon dioxide extraction. These methods generally need organic solvent and have long time for extraction (Jia et al., 1998). Solid phase micro-extraction ‘(SPME) technology’ is rapid and simple to extract the volatiles without organic solvent (Wang and Kang, 2009; Kang et al., 2009), and is easier to operation and lower cost than that of solvent extraction, steam distillation, pressing, chromatography, grease separation and carbon dioxide extraction methods.

The volatiles for Lysimachia genus, L. Paridiformi, L. Pentapetala, L. punctata and L. circaeoides are reported (Shi et al., 2010; Kang et al., 2011; Dtterl and Schffler, 2007; Wei et al., 2011). To the best of our knowledge, the volatile compositions of L. paridiformis var. stenophylla, L. fortumei and L. chikungensis have not been reported. So, this paper reported the volatile compounds in the L. paridiformis var. stenophylla, L. fortumei and L. chikungensis using head space solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for the first time.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

The leaves of L. paridiformis var. stenophylla were collected in Guiyang, China, in August 2009, the leaves of L. fortumei were collected in Guiyang, China, in June 2010, and the leaves of L. chikungensis were collected in Sandu country, Guizhou, China, in July 2010. They were identified by Professor Zhiyou Guo (Qiannan Normal College for Nationalities), Professor Deyuan Chen (Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine), and Professor Zhiyou Guo, respectively. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Henan University.

Volatiles preparation

Volatiles were extracted by the manual solid phase micro-extraction (SPME), instrument together with 5 mL vials and 65 µm Polydimethyl siloxane-divinyl benzene (PDMS-DVB), fiber head that purchased from Supelco Inc. Bellefonte, USA. The leaves of L. paridiformis var. Stenophylla, L. fortumei, and L. chikungensis were rapid dehydrated with allochroic silicagel. Three pulverized samples about 0.7 g were placed in vials (5 mL), then the SPME fiber heads were exposed in the upper space of the sealed vial for 30 min at 80°C to adsorb the analytes. And then, pull the fiber head out immediately and directly insert into to desorb for 1 min.

Determination conditions

By an Agilent 6890 N gas chromatograph equipped with HP-5 MS quartz elastic capillary column (0.25 µm × 30.0 m × 250 µm) and coupled with a 5975B mass selective detector spectrometer to analyze the volatile constituents. Determination conditions set as follows: The front inlet was kept at 250°C in split-less mode. The temperature program was as below: the initial column temperature was 50°C, held for 1 min, and then programmed to 120°C at a rate of 4°C. min-1 and held for 2 min; finally programmed to 230°C at a rate of 6°C. min−1, held at 230°C for 5 min. As a carrier gas helium at 1.0 mL·min-1 was used. MS conditions: The MS detector was used in the EI mode with an ionization voltage of 70 eV. The ion source temperature was at 230°C. The transfer line was at 280°C.The spectra were collected at 3 scans/s over the mass rang (m/z) 30–440.

Retention indices were calculated by using the retention times of n-alkanes that were injected at the same chromatographic conditions. The volatile constituents (Table 1), were identified by comparison of their linear retention indices (relative to C6–C26 alkanes on the HP-5MS column), and mass spectral database search (Nist 08.L library). The percentage composition of the volatile was computed from the GC peak areas normalization without any corrections.

Table 1.

Volatiles from the leaves of L. paridiformis var stenophylla, L. fortumei and L. chikungensisi

No. Compound Percentage (%) KI
L. paridiformis
var. Stenophylla
L.
fortumei
L. chikungensis
1 3-Hydroxy-N-methylphenethylamine - 1.23 - -
2 Ethanol 13.58 9.11 12.13 -
3 Trichloromethane 1.81 - 2.23 -
4 Isopentaldehyde 1.74 - - 648
5 Hexanoic acid, ethyl ester 1.14 - 999
6 Leaf alcohol - 1.59 850
7 (Z)-3-Hexenoic acid ethyl ester 0.77 - - 1004
8 Benzyl alcohol - - 1.13 1035
9 Linalool 8.4 5.88 1.63 1099
10 Phenylethyl alcohol 2.36 1.54 3.38 1110
11 Estragole 1.72 - - 1193
12 β-Cyclocitral 1.16 - 0.77 1212
13 cis-3-Hexenyl pentanoate - - 13.33 1234
14 Eugenol - - 1.46 1346
15 Tetradecane 0.52 - - 1398
16 2-methyl-5-(1,1,5-trimethyl-5-hexenyl)-Furan - 2.59 - 1432
17 Geranylacetone 1.35 1.53 1.55 1440
18 β-Ionone 8.05 2.72 4.18 1468
19 trans-β-Ionone epoxide - - 1.29 1472
20 Pentadecane 3.85 3.49 2.29 1498
21 Dihydroactinidiolide 1.6 - 2.4 1511
22 cis-3-Hexenyl benzoate - - 1.88 1564
23 Ethyllaurate 2.46 1.37 1.5 1593
24 Hexadecane 4.57 2.75 2.48 1598
25 2,6,10-trimethyl-Pentadecane - - 1.2 1646
26 6,9-Heptadecadiene - - 0.74 1664
27 Heptadecane 5.15 0.99 2.57 1697
28 2,6-dimethyl-Heptadecane 4.46 - 1.42 1699
29 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-Pentadecane 2.27 0.14 1.61 1700
30 Ethyl myristate 1.54 1.34 0.96 1790
31 Octadecane 2.14 1.11 1796
32 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-Hexadecane 2.86 1.89 1802
33 9-Octadecyne - 1.15 - 1855
34 6,10,14-trimethyl-2-Pentadecanone 1.3 - - 1836
35 Diisobutyl phthalate 1.21 - - 1849
36 Nonadecane 0.74 - - 1895
37 Butyl isobutyl phthalate 0.76 - - 1943
38 Ethyl palmitate 5.8 4.94 7.78 1988
39 Heneicosane - 4.49 5.38 2012
40 Phytol - - 0.7 2099
41 Linoleic acid ethyl ester 2.21 - 1.2 2151
42 (Z,Z,Z)-9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid ethyl
ester
- 3.14 3.08 2157
43 Ethyl Oleate 3.65 - - 2159
44 Docosane - 11.02 - 2200
45 Tricosane - 14.72 0.82 2294
46 Squalene -- - 2.9 2349
47 Tetracosane - 10.77 2400
48 Pentacosane - 9.81 2498
Total
(%)
89.17 94.72 88.58

Results

The volatiles in the leaves of L. paridiformis var stenophylla, L. fortumei and L. chikungensisi are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3. Twenty-nine compounds in the leaves of L. paridiformis var. stenophylla were identified (in Table 1), which comprised 89.17% of the total volatile fraction. The main constituents were ethanol (13.58%), linalool (8.4%), and β-ionone (8.05%). Monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenes, such as linalool and β-ionone were the main aroma constituents in L. paridiformis var. stenophylla.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Ion Chromatogram of leaves of L. paridiformis var. Stenophylla

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Ion Chromatogram of leaves of L. fortumei

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Ion Chromatogram of leaves of L. chikungensis

Twenty-one compounds were identified from the leaves of L. fortumei (Table 1), which comprised 94.72% of the total volatile fraction. The main constituents were alkanes, such as tricosane (14.72%), docosane (11.02%), tetracosane (10.77%) and pentacosane (9.81%).

Thirty-two compounds were identified from the leaves of L. chikungensis (in Table 1), which comprised 88.58% of the total volatile fraction. Typical compounds detected in L. chikungensis were cis-3-hexenyl pentanoate (13.33%), followed by ethanol (12.13%), hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester (7.78%) and heneicosane (5.38%).

Discussion

Chemical compositions of the essential oils reported in Lysimachia genus were organic acid and its esters, terpenoids and sesquiterpenes derivatives, aromatic compounds and their oxygenated derivatives, such as alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, phenols, ethers, lactones, and some of its nitrogen-containing and sulfur-containing compounds (Shi et al., 2010; Kang et al., 2011; Dtterl and Schffler, 2007; Wei et al., 2011). Components and contents of compounds of volatile oil are different among different plants. Volatiles in leaves of L. paridiformis var. stenophylla had alkanes (28.37%), alcohols (21.98%), esters (21.14%), ketones (10.7%), aldehydes (2.9%) and terpenoids (1.72%). Volatiles in leaves of L. fortumei had alkanes (59.63%), alcohols (14.99%), esters (10.79%), ketones (4.25%), aldehydes (4.13%) and alkynes (1.15%), and in leaves of L. chikungensis had alcohols (32.13%), alkanes (22.55%), esters (20.59%), ketones (7.02%), alkenes (3.64%), phenols (1.46%), alkynes (1.15%) and aldehydes (0.77%).

The common components of three plants were alkanes, alcohols, esters, ketones and aldehydes, and the contents of alkanes, alcohols and esters were the highest. Aliphatic saturated hydrocarbon was main ingredient of plant wax, it played a important role in protection of the plant, and once formed, it was no longer participate in metabolism and product of the end of metabolism (Zhou and Duan, 2005).

Alcohols accounted for 21.95%, 14.99% and 20.59% in the leaves of L. paridiformis var stenophylla, L. fortumei and L. chikungensisi respectively, but ethanol was up to 13.58%, 9.11% and 12.13% respectively, accounting for sixty percent of the alcohols. It could be seen that volatiles of the three plants were rich in ethanol, but ethanol could not be detected in the volatiles of L. paridiformis (Wei et al., 2011). This result may be conducted with the difference of drying methods. As known to all, water was a respiratory reaction medium; plant water content had great influence on respiration. L. paridiformis var. stenophylla, L. fortumei and L. chikungensis were rapidly dehydrated by allochroic silica gel, and made plant cell to a point of dehydration in a short time, normal aerobic respiration is hindered, glycolytic pathway turned into anaerobic respiration, NADH was generated in the dehydrogenation stage for the reduction of pyruvic acid, pyruvic acid was turned into acetaldehyde in pyruvate decarboxylase catalyst by oxidation decarboxylation pathway, and then, acetaldehyde was reduced to ethanol by alcohol dehydrogenase catalyst, while NADH was oxidized to NAD+. The leaves of L. paridiformis was dried naturally at room temperature, slow dehydration had little effect on aerobic respiration. Intracellular respiratory substrates were completely oxidized to CO2 and H2O. Therefore, ethanol was not detected in the volatiles.

Linalool and β-ionone were the main aroma constituents in L. paridiformis var. stenophylla. Linalool and β-ionone also existed in L. fortumei and L. chikungensis. Linalool and its oxides, with fragrance and sweet taste, had effects of antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral (State Drug Administration of Information Center of Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 1986), and they could inhibit the growth of aspergillus flavus, thereby and the generation of aflatoxin. So, they could be used as food additive. In addition, the three plants contained hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester, which could be used to synthesis reaction of flavors and perfume.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Basic and Advance Project in Science and Technology Agency of Henan Province (112300410075 and 22102310170) and Young Teachers-Funded projects of Institutions of Higher Learning in Henan Province (2012-704).

References

  • 1.Dtteri S, Schffler I. Flower Scent of Floral Oil-Producing Lysimachia punctata as Attractant for the Oil-Bee Macropis fulvipes. Journal of chemical ecology. 2007;33:441–445. doi: 10.1007/s10886-006-9237-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fang ZP, Zhang YJ, Sun XF. Studies on the Chemical Composition of Lysimachia fortunei Maxim. China Journal of Chinese Materia. 1989;14:35–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang XA, Cai JZ, Hu YJ, Zhang YH. Phytochemical investigation on Lysimachia fortune. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 2007;32:596–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kang WY, Ji ZQ, Wang JM. Composition of the essential oil of Adiantum flabellulatum. Chemistry of Natural Compounds. 2009;45:575–577. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kang WY, Wang JM, Tian PY. Composition of the essential oil of Lysimachia pentapetala flowers. Chemistry of Natural Compounds. 2011;47:452–453. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jia JP, He Y, Huang JX. Solid-Phase Micro-extraction in the Pretreatment of Environmental Samples. Progress in Chemistry. 1998;10:74–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li SH, Xiang QL. Studies on the Chemical Constituents of Lysimachia paridiformis var. Stenophylla. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs. 2010;41:881–883. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shi L, Ji ZQ, Kang WY. Analysis of Volatile Constituents in Lysimachia Circaeoides by Head-space Solid Micro-extraction, Coupled with GC-MS. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae. 2010;16:77–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.State Drug Administration of Information Center of Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, author. Handbook of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Drugs. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 1986. p. 135.p. 165.p. 182.p. 373.p. 669. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang JM, Kang WY. The Volatiles in the Stem of Nitraria tangutorum and Nitraria sibirica. Fine Chemicals. 2009;26:773–780. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wei JF, Zhang Q, Shang FD, Kang WY. Composition of the essential oil of Lysimachia paridiformis. Chemistry of Natural Compounds. 2011;47:454–455. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou RH, Duan JA. Phytochemistry taxology. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press.; 2005. [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Journal of Traditional, Complementary, and Alternative Medicines are provided here courtesy of African Traditional Herbal Medicine Supporters Initiative

RESOURCES