Abstract
Background
Medicinal plants are an important source of substances which are claimed to induce antimicrobial, antimutagenic and antioxidant effects. Many plants have been used due to their antimicrobial treatments. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of L. orientalis have not been reported to the present day. The aim of this work was to investigate of the antimicrobial and antioxidant potentials of different extracts from L. orientalis.
Materials and Methods
The extracts were screened for antimicrobial activity against different food pathogens. These bacteria include 4 Gram positive and 3 Gram negative bacteria and one fungi. The leaf extracts of plant were tested by disc diffusion assay. The MIC was evaluated on plant extracts as antimicrobial activity. In addition to, the plant extracts were tested against the stable DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazylhydrate) free-radical.
Results
The acetone, ethanol and methanol extracts of L. orientalis showed maximum inhibition zone of 12 mm against Yersinia enterocolitica, Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus. In addition to, the methanol extract displayed a strong antioxidant activity (trolox equivalent = 2.23 mM).
Conclusion
L. orientalis extracts have antimicrobial, and antioxidant potential. Our results support the use of this plant in traditional medicine and suggest that some of the plant extracts possess compounds with good antibacterial properties that can be used as antibacterial agents in the search for new drugs.
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity, Antioxidant activity, L. orientalis.
Introduction
Medicinal plants are natural resources, yielding valuable herbal products which are often used in the treatment of various ailments (Grabley and Thiericke, 1999). Liquidambar species belong to the family of Hamamelidacea. Liquidambar orientalis tree is commonly known as ‘Sığla ağacı’ or ‘Gunluk ağacı’ in Turkey (Hill, 1952; Davis, 1965; Tyler et al., 1981; Baytop, 1984). L. orientalis is a herbaceous plant known to have medicinal and cosmetic properties and is widely used in phytotherapy in the Mediterranean region. The storax produced by injuring L. orientalis has good antiseptic properties (Fernandez, 2005; Lee et al., 2009). Also it is used as a topical parasiticide, expectorant and for the treatment of some skin diseases in Turkish folk medicine. Storax has a wide application in cosmetics (Hafizoğlu, 1982). Most of the published studies were conducted on the essential oil composition of storax (Berkel and Huş, 1944; Hafizoğlu et al., 1996; Duru et al., 2002). The essential oil of L. orientalis was analysed by Hafizoğlu et al. (1996) and Duru et al. (2002). Many components were characterized, but the major ones were terpinen-4-ol, α-terpinol, sabinene and γ -terpinene. Up to date, several researchers reported that storax also has protective activity on many bacteria species, phytopathogenic fungi and nematode (Sagdic et al., 2005; Oskay and Sarı, 2007; Kim and Seo, 2008; Lee et al., 2009; Bayramoğlu, 2010).
Medicinal plants represent a rich source of are antimicrobial agents. These plants are used medicinally in different countries and are a source of many potent and powerful drugs (Srivastava et al., 1996). According to World Health Organization, medicinal plants would be the best source to obtain a variety of drugs. Therefore, such plants should be investigated to better understand their properties, safety and efficacy (Nascimento, 2000). Many plants have been used due to their antimicrobial traits, which are due to compounds synthesized in the secondary metabolism of the plant. The antimicrobial activity of L. orientalis leaf extracts against food pathogens has not been studied, the in vitro antimicrobial activity of leaves parts of the plant growing in Mugla was evaluated using disc diffusion method. Additionally, antioxidant activities of L. orientalis leaf extracts have not been reported. In this study, different extracts of plant leaves were investigated for antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. This work attempts to contribute to this lack of knowledge about the antimicrobial and antioxidant effects of L. orientalis leaf extracts.
Material and Methods
Plant material
Liquidambar orientalis leaves were collected in May 2012 from Koycegiz in Mugla. 10–15m height above sea level. K 36° 59′37,00′′, N 28° 38′50,00′′, The identity was confirmed by Olcay Ceylan, Department of Biology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University. The voucher specimens (Herbarium No: 398) were deposited at the Herbarium of Department of Biology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University. The identification of these specimens was carried out using the Flora of Turkey (Davis, 1965).
Plant extraction
The leaves were washed thoroughly 2–3 times with running water and once with sterile distilled water. Fresh plant material was air-dried, and then the dried leaves were powdered in a blender. All samples were stored at ambient temperature until initial sample preparation, after which they were stored at 4 °C until required for analysis.
The air dried and powdered leaves of the plant samples were extracted with different solvents such as acetone, ethanol and methanol (40 mg/mL) using the Soxhlet apparatus. All experiments were continued for 4 hours. All of extracts were evaporated and then the extracts were dissolved in their solvent and then kept in small sterile opac bottles under refrigerated conditions until used. All experiments were continued for 2 days.
Microorganisms and cultivation
The leaf extracts were individually tested against food pathogenic strains such as Bacillus subtilis RSKK245, Staphylococcus aureus RSKK2392, Salmonella Typhimurium RSKK19, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC8093, Escherichia coli ATCC11229, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC7644, Yersinia enterocolitica NCTC11174 and Candida albicans RSKK02029. The bacteria were grown for 24h at 37°C in Mueller-Hinton Broth (Merck). C. albicans was grown for 24–48h at 30°C in Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (Merck). These strains of bacteria and C. albicans were obtained from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, USA), RSKK (Refik Saydam National Type Culture Collection, Turkey) or NCTC (National Collection of Type Cultures).
Antimicrobial activity assay
Kirby-Bauer method applied for antimicrobial activity. The leaf extracts of plant were tested by disc diffusion assay. The concentration and quantity of extracts were used as 40 µL of 40 mg/mL. Organic solvents were used as acetone, ethanol and methanol in this study. The bacteria were maintained on Mueller-Hinton agar plates (MHA, Merck) at 37°C and fungi was maintained on Sabouraud Dextrose agar plates (SDA, Merck) (Bauer, 1966). Bacteria and C. albicans RSKK02029 cultures adjusted 0.5 McFarland. The experiments were performed in triplicate. Bacteria were incubated at 37°C in 24h. C. albicans RSKK02029 was incubated at 30°C for 24h. After incubation, the inhibition zones formed and then the values of zone were measured. Acetone, ethanol and methanol used as negative control. Tetracycline (30µg), chloramphenicol (30µg), nystatin (100µg), and penicillin (10µg) antibiotics used as positive control.
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
The MIC was evaluated on plant extracts as antimicrobial activity. The MIC was taken as the lowest concentration that inhibits growth after incubation. The serial dilution assay was performed as described in the CLSI standards (CLSI, 2003; CLSI, 2006). This test was performed at final concentrations of each extract (6500; 3250; 1625; 812.5; and 406.25 µg/mL).
In vitro Antioxidant Activity
The antioxidant activities of plant extracts were determined by DPPH method. The antioxidant activities were determined using DPPH as a free radical. Each of extract (0.1 mL) was added separately to 3.9 mL of a 0.1 mM methanolic DPPH solution. After incubation for 30 minutes, absorbance of extract was determination using spectrophotometer at 515 nm. Methanolic DPPH used as control (Brand et al., 1995). Trolox used as standard antioxidant. DPPH radical scavenging activity determined following formula.
DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) = [Abs (control) — Abs (extract)] × 100
Results
The antimicrobial activity of different extracts of L. orientalis were evaluated in vitro against 8 test microorganisms, which are known to cause some diseases in foods. The results of antimicrobial activities were shown in Table 1. Besides, the inhibition zone diameters of the reference antibiotics against the test microorganisms were shown in Table 2. The results of antibacterial activities were recorded as zone of inhibition in mm for all the materials used as follows.
Table 1.
Antimicrobial activity of L. orientalis leaf extracts (40 mg/mL)
| Microorganisms | Inhibition zone (mm) | ||
| Acetone | Ethanol | Methanol | |
| Bacillus subtilis RSKK245 | 8 | 10 | 11 |
| Staphylococcus aureus RSKK2392 | 9 | 12 | 10 |
| Listeria monocytogenes ATCC7644 | - | 11 | 12 |
| Enterococcus faecalis ATCC8093 | 7 | 9 | 10 |
| Escherichia coli ATCC1122 | - | 8 | 9 |
| Yersinia enterocolitica NCTC11174 | 12 | 10 | 11 |
| Salmonella Typhimurium RSKK19 | 8 | 10 | 10 |
| Candida albicans RSKK02029 | - | - | 7 |
Table 2.
Inhibition zone diameters of the reference antibiotics against test microorganisms
| Microorganisms | Antibiotics (inhibition zone- mm) |
|||
| TE | C | NS | P | |
| Bacillus subtilis RSKK245 | (nt) | (nt) | (nt) | 10 |
| Staphylococcus aureus RSKK2392 | (nt) | (nt) | (nt) | (nt) |
| Listeria monocytogenes ATCC7644 | (nt) | (nt) | (nt) | 10 |
| Enterococcus faecalis ATCC8093 | (nt) | (nt) | (nt) | (-) |
| Escherichia coli ATCC11229 | 14 | 20 | (nt) | 10 |
| Yersinia enterocolitica NCTC11174 | 20 | 30 | (nt) | (nt) |
| Salmonella Typhimurium RSKK19 | 14 | 21 | (nt) | (nt) |
| Candida albicans RSKK02029 | (nt) | (nt) | 7 | (nt) |
TE: Tetracycline (30µg); C: Chloramphenicol (30µg); NS: Nystatin (100µg); P: Penicillin (10µg); (-) : zone did not occur; (nt): not tested
Results show that the methanol extracts of L. orientalis inhibited the growth of eight bacteria and the inhibition zones ranged from 7 to 12 mm. In addition to, the acetone and ethanol extracts of this plant leaf did not determine any anticandidal effects against used yeast. Furthermore, acetone extract of L. orientalis did not show any antibacterial effects against used Escherichia coli ATCC1122. Results also show that the acetone extracts of L. orientalis inhibited the growth of 3 Gram positive and 2 Gram negative bacteria. Ethanol extract of the leaf was found to be highly effective against all of the Gram positive and negative bacteria, except Candida albicans RSKK02029 (Table 1).
Methanol extract of the leaves was found to be highly effective against all of test microorganisms (Table 1). The maximum zone of inhibition was produced by methanol extract against Listeria monocytogenes ATCC7644 (12mm). Ethanol extract shown maximal inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus RSKK2392 (12mm). Besides, acetone extract was shown maximal inhibition against Yersinia enterocolitica NCTC11174 (12mm). Whereas, the inhibition zone was not produced by acetone and ethanol extract against Candida albicans RSKK02029. C. albicans RSKK02029 was found resistant to these extracts. All of extracts were found equally effective in inhibiting the growth of Yersinia enterocolitica NCTC 11174, Staphylococcus aureus RSKK2392 and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC7644 (12mm) (Table 1).
In this study, 4 reference antibiotics were used as positive control. These include, tetracycline (30µg), chloramphenicol (30µg), nystatin (100µg), and penicillin (10µg). Tetracycline and chloramphenicol very strongly inhibited the growth of Yersinia enterocolitica NCTC11174 whereas, chloramphenicol exhibited a very big zone of inhibition against Salmonella Typhimurium and E. coli ATCC11229. Nystatin weakly inhibited the growth of Candida albicans RSKK02029 (Table 2).
Table 3 shows MICs of L. orientalis different extracts obtained by the broth serial dilution method. Bacillus subtilis RSKK245 showed the lowest sensitivity to 1625 µg/mL concentration of all extracts. Staphylococcus aureus RSKK2392 inhibited by ethanol and methanol extracts in 1625 µg/mL concentration. Listeria monocytogenes ATCC7644 showed the sensitivity to the highest concentration of all extracts (3250 µg/mL). Enterococcus faecalis ATCC8093 inhibited by acetone and ethanol extracts in 1625 µg/mL concentration. Three bacteria showed the sensitivity to highest concentration (3250 µg/mL) of all plant extracts. These include, Escherichia coli ATCC11229, Yersinia enterocolitica NCTC11174 and Salmonella Typhimurium RSKK19. Whereas, Candida albicans RSKK02029 inhibited by acetone and methanol extracts in 1625 µg/mL concentration (Table 3).
Table 3.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations of L. orientalis leaf extracts (µg/mL)
| Microorganisms | Acetone | Ethanol | Methanol |
| Bacillus subtilis RSKK245 | 1625 | 1625 | 1625 |
| Staphylococcus aureus RSKK2392 | 3250 | 1625 | 1625 |
| Listeria monocytogenes ATCC7644 | 3250 | 3250 | 3250 |
| Enterococcus faecalis ATCC8093 | 1625 | 1625 | 3250 |
| Escherichia coli ATCC11229 | 3250 | 3250 | 3250 |
| Yersinia enterocolitica NCTC11174 | 3250 | 3250 | 3250 |
| Salmonella Typhimurium RSKK19 | 3250 | 3250 | 3250 |
| Candida albicans RSKK02029 | 1625 | 3250 | 1625 |
The antioxidant activities of plant extracts were evaluated by the DPPH radical scavenging capacity. Table 4 shows the percent of DPPH radical scavenging capacity with trolox as reference. The methanol extract showed 86% inhibition at 40 mg/mL concentration (Table 4). Whereas, the ethanol extract showed 82% inhibition. Acetone extract has the lowest inhibition (35%).
Table 4.
DPPH radical scavenging capacity of L. orientalis leaf extracts (40 mg/mL)
| Acetone | Ethanol | Methanol | |
| % DPPH | 35 | 82 | 86 |
| Trolox (mM/g) | 0,90 ± 0 | 2,13 ± 0,003 | 2,23 ± 0,0007 |
Discussion
Medicinal plants have traditionally been used worldwide for the treatment of various human diseases (Chitme et al., 2004). They have proved to be abundant sources of biologically active compounds, many of which have been used as compounds to develop new pharmaceuticals (Palombo, 2011). L. orientalis Mill. were selected based on their relevant ethnomedical use (Hafizoğlu, 1982; Duru et al., 2002; Fernandez, 2005; Lee et al., 2009).
In the present study, extracts of the plant leaves obtained in different solvents were tested against 8 microorganisms. The antimicrobial activity was compared with the standard antibiotics (Table 1 and 2). The methanol extracts of L. orientalis inhibited the growth of eight bacteria and the inhibition zones ranged from 7 to 12 mm (Table 1). Zhong et al. (2007) reported that Liquidambar formosana Hance's leaf had antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. flexneri, Salmonella Typhi, and P. aeruginosa, the diameter of bacteriostatic circle was between 13 and 25 millimetre.
Although, the antibacterial activities of essential oils from many plant species have been extensively surveyed, this plant antimicrobial mechanism has not been reported in great detail. Since the active antimicrobial compounds of essential oils are phenolics and terpenes in nature (Jansen et al., 1987; Saxena et al., 1994), it seems reasonable that their mode of action might be similar to that of other phenolic compounds. Flavonoids and phenolic compounds have already been reported in plants (Chopra et al., 1956). These compounds have antibacterial and antifungal activities.
In this study, all of the plant leaf extracts were found to highly effective against Gram negative bacteria. Results of this study were shown in Table 1. It has been reported elsewhere that aqueous extract of Varthemia iphionoides has a high content of phenolic compounds and flavonoids (Al-Dabbas et al., 2006). This might explain its antibacterial activity and emphasize their earlier use for treatment of infections (Jabour, 1983; Karim and Quraan, 1986). Phytochemical evaluation of the leaves has shown the presence of flavonoids, tannins, saponins, phenol lectins, triterpenes, and carotenoids (Geidam et al., 2007). The biological and antimicrobial activity of leaf extract were largely attributed to flavonoids and another two chemicals namely guajaverin and psidiolic acid (Berdy et al., 1982; Jaiarj et al., 1999). Ethanol and methanol extracts were found equally effective in inhibiting the growth of Salmonella Typhimurium RSKK 19 (10 mm) (Table 1). Rahta et al. (2012) reported that root extracts of Hemidesmus sp. and Vetiveria sp. exhibited highest antibacterial activity on the growth of Salmonella Typhi.
Results of this study show that tested plant extracts were found to highly effective against Gram positive bacteria. The ethanol extracts of leaves were found to be effective against Staphylococcus aureus RSKK 2392 (Table 1). Oskay et al. (2009) showed that the most susceptible organism was methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) which was sensitive to methanol and ethanol extracts. Aliyu et al. (2008) reported that the aqueous extract of Vernonia blumeoides and Phyllanthus amarus against MRSA observed the maximum zone of inhibition which is 11mm and 13mm respectively. This results is like with our study. The essential oil of Liquidambar orientalis Mill. was analysed by Hafizoglu et al. (1996) and Duru et al. (2002) using GC-MS. Many components were characterized, but the major ones were terpinen-4-ol, α-terpinol, sabinene and γ-terpinene.
The screening of plant extracts using the DPPH free radical method proved to be effective for the selection of those which could have an antioxidant activity. These extracts may be rich in radical scavengers, such as flavonoids, known as antioxidants. It has been reported that free radical scavenging and antioxidant activity of many medicinal plants are responsible for their therapeutic effect against cancer, tissue inflammatory, cardiovascular disease (Cai et al., 2004). In this study, the methanol extract showed 86% free radical inhibition at 40 mg/mL concentration (Table 4). Liu et al. (2009) reported that high concentration of essential oil of L. formosana has a strong antioxidant effect. Other research found that guarana seed methanol extract has high antibacterial activity, when this methanol extract also possess high phenolics content (Majhenic et al., 2007).
It is inferred that methanolic extracts of L. orientalis are highly effective against Gram positive and negative bacterial strains and can be utilized as sources of natural antimicrobial agents. Methanol extract showed maximum inhibition against food pathogens. Furthermore, the development of natural antimicrobials will help to decrease the negative effects of synthetic drugs. Our results support the use of this plant in traditional medicine and suggest that some of the plant extracts possess compounds with good antibacterial properties that can be used as antibacterial agents in the search for new drugs. L. orientalis leaf extracts exhibited varying degrees of antioxidant activity in vitro. Methanol proved to be the most efficient extraction solvent of antioxidants. The extracts, especially methanolic extract of L. orientalis leaf, should be beneficial as an antioxidant protection system for the human body against oxidative damage. However, further researches are needed to explore the bioactive compounds in these selected medicinal plants. Undoubtedly, the antimicrobial and antioxidant effect of L. orientalis should be investigated further. Fractionation and characterization of the active compounds should be do further works to investigate.
References
- 1.Al-Dabbas MM, Suganuma T, Kitahara K, Hou DX, Fujii M. Cytotoxic, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Varthemia iphionoides. Boiss extracts J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;108:287–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aliyu AB, Musa AM, Abdullahi MS, Oyewale AO, Gwarzo US. Activity of Plant Extracts Used in Northern Nigerian Traditional Medicine Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Nig Journ Pharm Sci. 2008;7(1):1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Path. 1966;45:493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bayramoglu EE. Soaking with storax-possibility of using sigla tree (Liquidambar orientalis Mill. var. orientalis) storax as bactericide in the soaking float. Jalca. 2010;105:62–67. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baytop T. Therapy with Medicinal Plants in Turkey (Past and Present) Vol. 1. Istanbul: Istanbul University Publication; 1984. p. 305. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Berdy J, Aszlos A, Bostian M, Mcnitt KL. Hand book of antibiotic compounds. New York: C.R.C. Press; 1982. p. 410. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berkel A, Huş S. Studies on Sıgla tree forests and Sıgla oil. Ankara Agric Inst J. 1944;1(5):9–28. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brand WW, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. Food Sci Technol. 1995;28:25–30. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cai Y, Luo Q, Sun M, Corke H. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Sci. 2004;74:2157–2184. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chitme HR, Chandra R, Kaushik S. Studies on anti-diarrhoeal activity of Calotropis gigantea R. Br. in experimental animals. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2004;7(1):70–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chopra RN, Nayar SL, Chopra LC. Glossary of Indian medicinal plants. New Delhi: Council of Scientific & Industrial Research; 1956–92. p. 329. 1956–92. [Google Scholar]
- 12.CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute), author Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. Wayne, Philadelphia: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2003. Approved Standard M7-A 6th edn. [Google Scholar]
- 13.CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute), author Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Wayne, Philadelphia: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2006. 16th Informational Supplement M100-S16. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Davıs PH. Flora of Turkey and The East Aegaean Islands. Vol. 5. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1975. pp. 228–251. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duru ME, Çakır A, Harmandar M. Composition of Volatile Oils Isolated from The Leaves of Liquidambar orientalis Mill. var. orientalis and L.orientalis var. integriloba from Turkey. Flavour Fragrance J. 2002;17(2):95–98. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fernandez X. Chemical composition of the essential oils from Turkish and Honduras Styrax. Flavour Fragrance J. 2005;20:70–73. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Geidam YA, Usman H, Abubaker MB, Ibrahim B, Carnat AP. Effects of aqueous leaf extracts of Psidium guajava on bacteria isolated from noval of day-old chicks. Res J Microbiol. 2007;2:960–965. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Grabley S, Thiericke R. Drug discovery from nature. Vol. 3. Berlin: Springer; 1999. The impact of natural products on drug discovery; pp. 51–55. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hafizoglu H, Reunanen M, Istek A. Chemical composition of levant storax. Holzforschung. 1996;50:116–117. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hafizoglu H. Analytical studies on the balsam of Liquidambar orientalis Mill. by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Holzforschung. 1982;36:311–313. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hill AF. Economic Botany: A Textbook of Useful Plants and Products. Vol. 2. New York: McGraw Hill; 1952. p. 560. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jabour J. Al-kanoon in medicine of Avicenna. Beirut: Al- Maaref Library; 1983. p. 285. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jaiarj P, Khoohaswan P, Wongkrajang Y, Peungvicha P, Suriyawong P, Saraya ML, Ruangsomboon O. Anticough and antimicrobial activities of Psidium guajava Linn. leaf extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999;67:203–212. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(99)00022-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Janssen AM, Scheffer JJC, Svendsen AB. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils: A 1976–1986 literature review. Aspects of the test methods. Planta Med. 1987;53:395–398. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-962755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Karim FM, Quraan SA. Med plant Jordan. Irbid-Jordan: Yarmouk University; 1986. p. 61. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim J, Seo SM. Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from coriander (Coriandrum sativum), oriental sweetgum (Liquidambar orientalis), and valerian (Valeriana wallichii) essential oils against pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(16):7316–7320. doi: 10.1021/jf800780f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee YS, Kim J, Lee SG, Oh E, Shin SC, Park K. Effects of plant essential oils and components from Oriental sweetgum (Liquidambar orientalis) on growth and morphogenesis of three phytopathogenic fungi. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2009;93:138–143. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu Y, Liu Y, Li P. Study on Antimicrobial Activities of Essential Oil from Leaves of Liquidambar formosana Hance as well as Its Antioxidant Activity. Food Sci. 2009:11. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Majhenic L, Skerget M, Knez Z. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of guarana seed extract. Food Chem. 2007;104:1258–1268. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nascimento GGF, Lacatelli J, Freitas PC, Silva GL. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts and phytochemicals on antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Braz J Microbiol. 2000;31:886–891. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Oskay M, Oskay D, Kalyoncu F. Activity of Some Plant Extracts Against Multi-Drug Resistant Human Pathogens. Iran J Pharm Res. 2009;8(4):293–300. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oskay M, Sarı D. Antimicrobial screening of some Turkish medicinal plants. Pharm Biol. 2007;45(3):176–181. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Palombo EA. Traditional Medicinal Plant Extracts and Natural Products with Activity against Oral Bacteria: Potential Application in the Prevention and Treatment of Oral Diseases. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011 doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ratha M, Subha K, Senthilkumar G, Panneerselvam A. Screening of phytochemical and antibacterial activity of Hemidesmus indicus (L.) and Vetiveria zizanoides (L.) Eur J Exp Biol. 2012;2(2):363–368. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sağdıç O, Özkan G, Özcan M, Özçelik S. A Study on Inhibitory Effects of Sığla Tree (Liquidambar orientalis Mill. var. orientalis) Storax Against Several Bacteria. Phytother Res. 2005;19:549–551. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Saxena G, McCutcheon AR, Farmer S, Towers GHN. Hancock REW: Antimicrobial constituents of Rhus glabra. J Ethnopharm. 1994;42:95–100. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(94)90102-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Srivastava J, Lambert J, Vietmeyer N. An expanding role in development. Vol. 320. Washington: 1996. Medicinal plants. World Bank Technical Paper. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tyler VE, Brady LR, Robbens JE. Pharmacognosy. Vol. 8. Philadelphia: Lae & Febiger Publisher; 1981. p. 160. [Google Scholar]
- 39.You-tian Zhong, Xiao-li Wang, Lian-lan MA. Studies on Antimicrobial Activity of Liquidambar formosana Hance's Leaf. Li Shizhen Med Mater Med Res. 2007:2007–3007. [Google Scholar]
