Abstract
Background
Ursolic acid (UA), a triterpenoid compound, is reported to have a glucose-lowering effect. However, the mechanisms are not fully understood. Adipose tissue is one of peripheral tissues that collectively control the circulating glucose levels.
Objective
The objective of the present study was to determine the effect and further the mechanism of action of UA in adipocytes.
Methods and Results
The 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were induced to differentiate and treated with different concentrations of UA. NBD-fluorescent glucose was used as the tracer to measure glucose uptake and Western blotting used to determine the expression and activity of proteins involved in glucose transport. It was found that 2.5, 5 and 10 µM of UA promoted glucose uptake in a dose-dependent manner (17%, 29% and 35%, respectively). 10 µM UA-induced glucose uptake with insulin stimulation was completely blocked by the phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor wortmannin (1 µM), but not by SB203580 (10 µM), the inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), or compound C (2.5 µM), the inhibitor of AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) inhibitor. Furthmore, the downstream protein activities of the PI3K pathway, phosphoinositide-dependent kinase (PDK) and phosphoinositide-dependent serine/threoninekinase (AKT) were increased by 10 µM of UA in the presence of insulin. Interestingly, the activity of AS160 and protein kinase C (PKC) and the expression of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) were stimulated by 10 µM of UA under either the basal or insulin-stimulated status. Moreover, the translocation of GLUT4 from cytoplasm to cell membrane was increased by UA but decreased when the PI3K inhibitor was applied.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that UA stimulates glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes through the PI3K pathway, providing important information regarding the mechanism of action of UA for its anti-diabetic effect.
Introduction
The prevalence of diabetes has dramatically increased and results in a considerably higher rate of mortality worldwide. Insulin resistance has been considered as a well-known metabolic disorder of diabetes, which is closely related with serious complications such as cardiovascular and kidney diseases [1]. Insulin is critical in glucose homeostasis and stimulates the transport of blood glucose into the cells for metabolism in the peripheral tissues (such as muscle, fat tissue and liver) by regulating the expression and translocation of glucose transporters [2], [3]. When insulin resistance occurs, the insulin-mediated glucose uptake is impaired, leading to reduced glucose uptake into muscle, adipose or liver cells and consequently the elevation of blood glucose concentration. Accordingly, agents with an ability of stimulating glucose uptake in these tissues are used to improve or treat insulin resistance and diabetes.
Although some effective therapeutic drugs have been developed and used for many years to treat diabetes, most of these drugs produce undesirable or severe side effects, such as induction of fat accumulation [4], inhibition of hepatic regeneration [5], and causing osteoporosis [6]. Therefore, there is a need to develop new anti-diabetic products, especially through an approach of stimulating glucose uptake and utilization in peripheral tissues without causing obvious side effects. In this regard, natural products have provided a new avenue and been considered having great potential.
Ursolic acid (UA) is a natural pentacyclic triterpenoid and present in many different plants, fruits and herbs. Accumulating evidence has shown that UA possesses multiple nutritional and pharmacological functions [7], [8]. Recent studies have revealed that UA decreases weight gain and abdominal fat mass in mice fed a high-fat diet [9], [10]. Further studies have demonstrated that UA reduces adiposity by enhancing lipolysis [11], [12] and inhibiting adipogenesis [13]. It is well established that central obesity is closely related to insulin resistance and diabetes [14]. We hypothesized that UA might be beneficial to insulin resistant or diabetic patients partially through regulating fat and glucose metabolism. Indeed, emerging evidence demonstrates that UA is able to lower blood glucose and improve insulin resistance and diabetes [15]–[19]. Although several mechanisms have been reported, such as promoting the glucose uptake and utilization in muscle cells [20], [21], increasing liver glycogen synthesis and deposition [22], and increasing pancreatic β-cell function [16], it is not clear whether and how UA modulates glucose uptake and metabolism in adipose tissue, which plays an important role in glucose homeostasis through taking up glucose when the circulating glucose level is elevated [23]. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to determine the effect of UA on glucose uptake and further on the protein expression and activity of the insulin signaling pathway. Here we report that UA promotes glucose uptake in adipocytes through the phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway and enhancing glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) translocation and expression.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and reagents
Ursolic acid, cytochalasin B, insulin, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), dexamethasone, wortmannin, SB203580, compound C, protease inhibitor and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). High glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) was from Mediatech, Inc. (Cellgro Mediatech, Inc. Manassas, VA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was bought from PAA Laboratories (Etobicoke, ON, Canada). Bovine calf serum (BCS) was purchased from Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). The BCA protein assay kit was obtained from Thermo Scientific (San Jose, CA, USA). RIPA lysis buffer was from Millpore (MA, USA). Protein loading buffer was from Bio-Rad (Montreal, QC, Canada). Antibodies against phospho-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase (pPDK), phosphoinositide-dependent kinase (PDK), phospho-protein kinase C (PKC), protein kinase C (PKC), phospho-AS160 (pAS160), AS160, GLUT4, glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), phospho-phosphoinositide-dependent serine/threonine kinase (pAKT), phosphoinositide-dependent serine/threonine kinase (AKT) and clathrin were from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, Massachusetts, USA). 2-NBD-glucose was purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). BM chemiluminescence blotting substrate kit was from Roche Diagnosis (Laval, QC, Canada).
Cell culture
3T3-L1 mouse embryo fibroblasts were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and cultured in DMEM containing 10% BCS until confluent, and were then maintained in the same medium for additional 2 d. The cells were then induced to differentiate according to the method reported previously [13], [24].
Cell viability
After differentiation, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were cultured in the presence of 2.5 to 50 µM of UA for 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively. At each time point, the cells were treated with MTT assay reagents (1 mg/mL) for 4 h and the resulting formazan was solubilized in 150 µL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and further diluted 10 times with DMSO. The absorbance was read at 570 nm on a Varioskan Flash spectral scanning multimode plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Measurement of glucose uptake
3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured in 96-well plates and induced to differentiate for 8 d. The cells were then starved overnight in DMEM with 0.1% BSA and further incubated in Krebs Ringer bicarbonate buffer (110 mM NaCl, 4.4 mM KCl, 1.45 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 2.3 mM CaCl2, 4.8 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM HEPES and 0.3% BSA) containing 100 µM NBD-glucose, 2.8 mM glucose and different concentrations of UA for 2 h at 37°C in the presence or absence of 1 µg/mL insulin. After 2 h incubation, the reaction was terminated by 20 µM of cytochalasin B. The cells were washed twice with cold Krebs Ringer bicarbonate buffer (4°C), and then 100 uL cold PBS (4°C) were added to each well. The fluorescence intensity was immediately measured at 466/550 nm on a Varioskan Flash spectral scanning multimode plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). For the inhibition experiments, the cells were pretreated with PI3K inhibitor wortmannin (1 µM), MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (10 µM), and AMPK inhibitor compound C (2.5 µM), respectively, for 30 min.
Western blotting
3T3-L1 preadipocytes were grown in 75 cm2 flasks and differentiated. After treatment with different concentrations of UA, total protein was extracted using the method described previously [24]. For measuring the translocation of GLUT4, membrane proteins were separated using a membrane protein extraction kit (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) following the manufacturers’ protocol. The protein of GLUT4 was determined using the Western blotting, with clathrin being used as the loading control.
Immunofluorescence assay
3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured in glass-bottomed dishes and differentiated in the induction medium. The differentiated adipocytes were starved in DMEM with 0.1% BSA for 3 h. After pretreatment with wortmannin for 30 min, the cells were treated with 10 µM of UA for 2 h in the presence or absence of 1 µg/mL insulin. They were washed once with ice-cold PBS, fixed for 15 min in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeablized in 0.25% Triton X-100 for 5 min at 4°C, and washed 3 times using ice-cold PBS. After blocking in 10% normal donkey serum at room temperature for 1 h, the cells were washed and incubated at 4°C with anti-GLUT4 antibody overnight. After three washes of 10 min each with PBS, the FITC-conjugated secondary antibody was applied to the samples at room temperature for 1 h. After washing with PBS, images were immediately captured under a Nikon inverted microscope (ECLIPSE TE200).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0 statistical program (version 13.01S; Beijing Stats Data Mining Co. Ltd). The treatment effect was determined using one-way ANOVA and followed by a post-hoc Dunnett's or Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test, where a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as means ± SD.
Results
Effect of UA on fat cell viability
The MTT assay results revealed that UA at concentrations up to 35 µM did not affect cell viability after 24 or 48 h of incubation ( Figure. 1A, B ), while 20 µM and above being toxic after 72 h of incubation in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes ( Figure 1C ). The concentrations of 20 µM and higher were also toxic in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes [13]. Therefore, a maximal concentration of 10 µM was used in the subsequent experiments.
UA increases glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes
To investigate the effect of UA on glucose uptake, differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were cultured in DMEM supplemented with different concentrations of UA for 2 h in the presence or absence of 1 µg/mL of insulin. As shown in Figure 2 , 2.5, 5, or 10 µM of UA significantly increased glucose uptake by 17%, 29% and 35%, respectively, which was supported by the increase of intracellular fluorescent intensity of NBD-glucose. Glucose uptake was stimulated by insulin at 1 µg/mL and further increased by UA in a dose-dependent manner ( Figure 2 ).
UA stimulates glucose uptake through the PI3K pathway
To identify the pathway through which UA stimulated glucose uptake, the differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were pretreated with the PI3K, MAPK and AMPK inhibitors, respectively, and then treated with 10 µM of UA in the presence or absence of 1 µg/mL insulin. PI3K inhibitor wortmannin at 1 µM completely blocked the glucose uptake stimulated by insulin, while showing weak effect at the basal level, i.e., in the absence of insulin ( Figure 3 ). MAPK inhibitor SB203580 at 10 µM or AMPK inhibitor compound C at 2.5 µM did not have any effect on the UA-stimulated glucose uptake at either the basal or insulin-stimulated status (Fig. S1). These results suggest that the PI3K pathway was responsible for the UA-induced increase of glucose uptake, especially under the conditions of insulin stimulation.
UA stimulates glucose uptake through regulating protein activities in the PI3K pathway
To confirm the role of PI3K pathway in upregulating glucose uptake in adipocytes by UA, we further determined the expression or the activity of key proteins of this pathway in the presence or absence of insulin. The activity of PDK and AKT was increased when the cells were treated with 10 µM of UA and more obvious when 1 µg/mL of insulin was applied ( Figure 4 ), which was however inhibited by the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin. This observation supported the notion that PI3K pathway was responsible for the enhancing effect of UA on glucose uptake, especially under insulin stimulation in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. AS160 was a downstream target protein of AKT, and the PKC was a parallel kinase to AKT, which both serve as the effectors facilitating GLUT4 translocation and subsequent glucose uptake [25]. In this study we also observed increases in the activity of AS160 and PKC by UA at 10 µM at either the basal or insulin-stimulated status.
UA enhances GLUT4 expression and translocation
GLUT4 is the key molecule that transports glucose into cells and is critical for glucose uptake by adipose and muscle tissues and thus postprandial glucose clearance from the circulating system. We observed that after 24 h of incubation with 10 µM of UA not only increased the expression of total cellular protein of GLUT4 ( Figure 4 ) but also increased its presence on the cell membrane at either the basal or insulin stimulated status ( Figure 5B ). This effect was attenuated by the pretreatment of cells with PI3K inhibitor wortmannin. The result of the immunoflurence assay provided additional support ( Figure 5A ). GLUT1 was reported to function in the process of glucose uptake under a basal status; however, there were not any effects of UA on GLUT1 expression ( Figure 4 ). Together, these results imply that the enhancement of GLUT4 expression and translocation was responsible for the observed increase of glucose uptake by UA in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
Discussion
Ursolic acid is well known to possess a wide range of biological functions, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, anti-mutagenic, anti-carcinogenic, hepatoprotective, anti-microbial, anti-atherosclerotic, and anti-hyperlipidemic effects [7], [8]. We have previously demonstrated that UA inhibits adipogenesis through the LKB1/AMPK pathway [13] and promotes lipolysis in adipocytes via the PPARγ signaling [13], and shows an anti-obesity effect in vivo [26]. Our recent study showed that UA improved insulin resistance, inflammation and oxidative stress in high-fat diet-induced rats [26]. Obesity is highly related to insulin resistance and T2DM through a mechanism of increased release of fatty acids, glycerol, hormones, pro-inflammatory cytokines and other risk factors from adipose tissue [14]. Adipose insulin resistance contributes to the total insulin resistance and liver complications caused by obesity [27]–[30]. Since UA possesses anti-obesity and anti-insulin resistance effects and has benefits to the adipose tissue fat metabolism, we wondered whether and how UA regulates glucose metabolism in adipocytes. In this study, we demonstrated that UA stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes through upregulating the PI3K pathway and GLUT4 expression and translocation.
Several studies have demonstrated the hypoglycemic effect of UA [15]–[19]. The reported mechanisms include the inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) [21], increase of liver glycogen synthesis [22], enhancement of pancreatic β-cell function [16] and the activation of skeletal muscle AKT activity [20]. Glucose homeostasis is determined by glucose production and utilization in the insulin-sensitive organs and tissues, including muscle, liver and adipose tissue. Glucose uptake in adipose tissue plays a critical role in the body glucose control [23], which is demonstrated by the selective depletion of GLUT4 in adipose tissues of mice [31]. We observed that UA stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes in a dose-dependent manner at either the basal or insulin-stimulated status. Wortmannin is a PI3K inhibitor, when it was added in the culture medium of 3T3-L1 adipocytes, the effect of UA on glucose uptake was almost completely abolished. PDK is the downstream target of the PI3K and functions as an activator of AKT [25]. UA activated the PDK and AKT in the presence of insulin and again this effect was attenuated by wortmannin. PKC is a parallel kinase to AKT [32] and AS160 is the substrate of AKT [25]. They are all involved the regulation of GLUT4 translocation. Interestingly, the UA alone or together with insulin increased the activities of PKC and AS160, both are important effectors in modulating glucose uptake [25]. These effects of UA were suppressed by the PI3K inhibitor. The findings suggest that the PI3K pathway is responsible for the UA-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes.
Although the results of the present study suggested that UA enhanced glucose uptake through the PI3K pathway, we could not rule out other pathways that may also contribute to the increased glucose uptake in adipose tissue. MAPK has been shown to modulate glucose uptake stimulated by insulin or other factors in adipocytes and muscle cells [33], [34]. AMPK is reported to be a key regulator of glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes [35]. We demonstrated previously that UA inhibited adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes through stimulating the AMPK activity [13], suggesting a possible role of AMPK in the UA-enhanced glucose uptake. To understand the role of these molecules in UA-regulated glucose uptake, we further investigated the effect of the kinase inhibitors on the UA-induced increase of glucose uptake in adipocytes. Surprisingly, AMPK inhibitor (compound C) or MAPK inhibitor (SB203580) did not block the stimulatory effect of UA on glucose uptake, indicating that the regulation of UA on glucose uptake in adipocytes was independent of the MAPK and AMPK pathways.
Glucose uptake in adipocytes is regulated by glucose transporters, GLUT1 and GLUT4 [36], [37]. Of them, GLUT1 is essential for basal glucose transport in various tissues, whereas GLUT4 is selectively expressed in the insulin-responsive tissues, such as adipose and skeletal muscle cells. UA did not show any effect on GLUT1 expression but significantly upregulated GLUT4 levels in adipocytes. When blood glucose level is elevated, insulin is released into the blood stream and triggers insulin signaling. The GLUT4 moves from cytoplasm to the cell membrane where it transports glucose across the membrane into the cells. Thus, the total expression and translocation of GLUT4 is critical in glucose transport and uptake, and subsequently glucose disposal and clearance from the circulation. Both the protein expression and immonofluorescence assay results revealed that UA upregulated GLUT4 expression and translocation, in good agreement with the increased activity of AS160, which is a key regulator of GLUT4 trafficking in 3T3-L1 adipocytes [38], [39]. This notion was further supported by the effect on PKC that regulates GLUT4 distribution in 3T3-L1 adipocytes [40]. We did not determine the effect of UA on the activity of insulin receptor and insulin receptor substrate, which are important proteins at the upstream of the PI3K pathway. However, UA has been reported to increase insulin receptor phosphorylation in the presence of insulin [18]. It should be pointed out that UA increases the phosphorylation and activity of AMPK and the expression of CPT1, thus inhibits fatty acid synthesis while enhancing fat oxidation [13]. As a result, UA stimulated glucose uptake but did not promote the synthesis and accumulation of fat in adipocytes.
In conclusion, UA increased glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes by activating the PI3K pathway and GLUT4 translocation. The results provide additional information regarding the mechanism of action of UA for its anti-diabetic effect.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Ben Perry and Tiantian Zhao for their technical support during the experiments.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Internal Research Project of the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (YJ201202) and the National Natural Science Fund of China (81130049). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Grundy SM, Benjamin IJ, Burke GL, Chait A, Eckel RH, et al. (1999) Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 100: 1134–1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chang L, Chiang SH, Saltiel AR (2004) Insulin signaling and the regulation of glucose transport. Mol Med 10: 65–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Khan AH, Pessin JE (2002) Insulin regulation of glucose uptake: a complex interplay of intracellular signalling pathways. Diabetologia 45: 1475–1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. de Souza CJ, Eckhardt M, Gagen K, Dong M, Chen W, et al. (2001) Effects of pioglitazone on adipose tissue remodeling within the setting of obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 50: 1863–1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Turmelle YP, Shikapwashya O, Tu S, Hruz PW, Yan Q, et al. (2006) Rosiglitazone inhibits mouse liver regeneration. FASEB J 20: 2609–2611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rzonca SO, Suva LJ, Gaddy D, Montague DC, Lecka-Czernik B (2004) Bone is a target for the antidiabetic compound rosiglitazone. Endocrinology 145: 401–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ikeda Y, Murakami A, Ohigashi H (2008) Ursolic acid: an anti- and pro-inflammatory triterpenoid. Mol Nutr Food Res 52: 26–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Liu J (2005) Oleanolic acid and ursolic acid: research perspectives. J Ethnopharmacol 100: 92–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jayaprakasam B, Olson LK, Schutzki RE, Tai MH, Nair MG (2006) Amelioration of obesity and glucose intolerance in high-fat-fed C57BL/6 mice by anthocyanins and ursolic acid in Cornelian cherry (Cornus mas). J Agric Food Chem 54: 243–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Rao VS, de Melo CL, Queiroz MG, Lemos TL, Menezes DB, et al. (2011) Ursolic acid, a pentacyclic triterpene from Sambucus australis, prevents abdominal adiposity in mice fed a high-fat diet. J Med Food 14: 1375–1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kim J, Jang DS, Kim H, Kim JS (2009) Anti-lipase and lipolytic activities of ursolic acid isolated from the roots of Actinidia arguta. Arch Pharm Res 32: 983–987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Li Y, Kang Z, Li S, Kong T, Liu X, et al. (2010) Ursolic acid stimulates lipolysis in primary-cultured rat adipocytes. Mol Nutr Food Res 54: 1609–1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. He Y, Li Y, Zhao T, Wang Y, Sun C (2013) Ursolic acid inhibits adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes through LKB1/AMPK pathway. PLoS One 8: e70135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kahn SE, Hull RL, Utzschneider KM (2006) Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature 444: 840–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jang SM, Kim MJ, Choi MS, Kwon EY, Lee MK (2010) Inhibitory effects of ursolic acid on hepatic polyol pathway and glucose production in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Metabolism 59: 512–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jang SM, Yee ST, Choi J, Choi MS, Do GM, et al. (2009) Ursolic acid enhances the cellular immune system and pancreatic beta-cell function in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice fed a high-fat diet. Int Immunopharmacol 9: 113–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kazmi I, Rahman M, Afzal M, Gupta G, Saleem S, et al. (2012) Anti-diabetic potential of ursolic acid stearoyl glucoside: a new triterpenic gycosidic ester from Lantana camara. Fitoterapia 83: 142–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kunkel SD, Suneja M, Ebert SM, Bongers KS, Fox DK, et al. (2011) mRNA expression signatures of human skeletal muscle atrophy identify a natural compound that increases muscle mass. Cell Metab 13: 627–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lee J, Yee ST, Kim JJ, Choi MS, Kwon EY, et al. (2010) Ursolic acid ameliorates thymic atrophy and hyperglycemia in streptozotocin-nicotinamide-induced diabetic mice. Chem Biol Interact 188: 635–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kunkel SD, Elmore CJ, Bongers KS, Ebert SM, Fox DK, et al. (2012) Ursolic acid increases skeletal muscle and brown fat and decreases diet-induced obesity, glucose intolerance and fatty liver disease. PLoS One 7: e39332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhang W, Hong D, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Shen Q, et al. (2006) Ursolic acid and its derivative inhibit protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B, enhancing insulin receptor phosphorylation and stimulating glucose uptake. Biochim Biophys Acta 1760: 1505–1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Azevedo MF, Camsari C, Sa CM, Lima CF, Fernandes-Ferreira M, et al. (2010) Ursolic acid and luteolin-7-glucoside improve lipid profiles and increase liver glycogen content through glycogen synthase kinase-3. Phytother Res 24 Suppl 2: S220–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM (2006) Adipocytes as regulators of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Nature 444: 847–853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. He Y, Li Y, Zhang S, Perry B, Zhao T, et al. (2013) Radicicol, a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, inhibits differentiation and adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 436: 169–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Krook A, Wallberg-Henriksson H, Zierath JR (2004) Sending the signal: molecular mechanisms regulating glucose uptake. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36: 1212–1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Li S, Liao X, Meng F, Wang Y, Sun Z, et al. (2014) Therapeutic role of ursolic acid on ameliorating hepatic steatosis and improving metabolic disorders in high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease rats. PLoS One 9: e86724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Donnelly KL, Smith CI, Schwarzenberg SJ, Jessurun J, Boldt MD, et al. (2005) Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest 115: 1343–1351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Guerre-Millo M (2004) Adipose tissue and adipokines: for better or worse. Diabetes Metab 30: 13–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Haukeland JW, Damas JK, Konopski Z, Loberg EM, Haaland T, et al. (2006) Systemic inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is characterized by elevated levels of CCL2. J Hepatol 44: 1167–1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Pagano C, Soardo G, Pilon C, Milocco C, Basan L, et al. (2006) Increased serum resistin in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is related to liver disease severity and not to insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 1081–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Abel ED, Peroni O, Kim JK, Kim YB, Boss O, et al. (2001) Adipose-selective targeting of the GLUT4 gene impairs insulin action in muscle and liver. Nature 409: 729–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bandyopadhyay G, Standaert ML, Zhao L, Yu B, Avignon A, et al. (1997) Activation of protein kinase C (alpha, beta, and zeta) by insulin in 3T3/L1 cells. Transfection studies suggest a role for PKC-zeta in glucose transport. J Biol Chem 272: 2551–2558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bazuine M, Ouwens DM, Gomes de Mesquita DS, Maassen JA (2003) Arsenite stimulated glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes involves both Glut4 translocation and p38 MAPK activity. Eur J Biochem 270: 3891–3903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Somwar R, Kim DY, Sweeney G, Huang C, Niu W, et al. (2001) GLUT4 translocation precedes the stimulation of glucose uptake by insulin in muscle cells: potential activation of GLUT4 via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Biochem J 359: 639–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Yamaguchi S, Katahira H, Ozawa S, Nakamichi Y, Tanaka T, et al. (2005) Activators of AMP-activated protein kinase enhance GLUT4 translocation and its glucose transport activity in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 289: E643–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Scheepers A, Joost HG, Schurmann A (2004) The glucose transporter families SGLT and GLUT: molecular basis of normal and aberrant function. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 28: 364–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Shepherd PR, Kahn BB (1999) Glucose transporters and insulin action–implications for insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 341: 248–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Eguez L, Lee A, Chavez JA, Miinea CP, Kane S, et al. (2005) Full intracellular retention of GLUT4 requires AS160 Rab GTPase activating protein. Cell Metab 2: 263–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Larance M, Ramm G, Stockli J, van Dam EM, Winata S, et al. (2005) Characterization of the role of the Rab GTPase-activating protein AS160 in insulin-regulated GLUT4 trafficking. J Biol Chem 280: 37803–37813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bosch RR, Bazuine M, Span PN, Willems PH, Olthaar AJ, et al. (2004) Regulation of GLUT1-mediated glucose uptake by PKClambda-PKCbeta(II) interactions in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Biochem J 384: 349–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.