Skip to main content
BMC Genetics logoLink to BMC Genetics
. 2004 May 26;5:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-5-12

A microsatellite linkage map of Drosophila mojavensis

Regina Staten 1,2, Sheri Dixon Schully 1, Mohamed AF Noor 1,
PMCID: PMC420461  PMID: 15163351

Abstract

Background

Drosophila mojavensis has been a model system for genetic studies of ecological adaptation and speciation. However, despite its use for over half a century, no linkage map has been produced for this species or its close relatives.

Results

We have developed and mapped 90 microsatellites in D. mojavensis, and we present a detailed recombinational linkage map of 34 of these microsatellites. A slight excess of repetitive sequence was observed on the X-chromosome relative to the autosomes, and the linkage groups have a greater recombinational length than the homologous D. melanogaster chromosome arms. We also confirmed the conservation of Muller's elements in 23 sequences between D. melanogaster and D. mojavensis.

Conclusions

The microsatellite primer sequences and localizations are presented here and made available to the public. This map will facilitate future quantitative trait locus mapping studies of phenotypes involved in adaptation or reproductive isolation using this species.

Background

Evolutionary biologists have struggled to determine the number and types of genetic changes that lead to speciation. Recent advances in molecular techniques facilitate a more thorough investigation into these issues. For example, by mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting interesting traits, we can explore the genetic basis of phenotypic variation between two populations that may lead to reproductive isolation.

One hallmark species used in studies of speciation and ecological adaptation is the desert cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. D. mojavensis belongs to the mulleri complex of the repleta species group within the subgenus Drosophila. Unlike many well-studied Drosophila, its ecological niche has been well documented, and extensive cytogenetic work has been done on it and its close relative, D. arizonae [see e.g., [1]]. With regard to speciation, D. mojavensis has been the subject of many genetic and phenotypic studies of mate choice [e.g., [2-5]], hybrid sterility and inviability [6,7], and variation in sperm and female sperm-storage organ length [8,9]. However, all of these studies have been forced to use a handful of either allozyme or morphological mutant markers. Microsatellites have been isolated from this species before [10], but they are unmapped and their sequences are not available.

Here, we present a microsatellite-based linkage map of the five major chromosomes of D. mojavensis using a new set of markers. We mapped 25 microsatellites to the X chromosome and 65 microsatellites spanning the four major autosomes. We also use our results to confirm the conservation of Muller's chromosome elements [11] across approximately 65 million years of evolutionary divergence between D. melanogaster and D. mojavensis [see [12]]. Muller [11] had suggested that chromosomal elements conserve their identities (ie, complement of genes) across all Drosophila species, and several subsequent studies have supported this idea [e.g., [13-15]], though only one study involving the repleta group [16].

Results and Discussion

Primers were successfully developed for a total of 116 markers. Of these, 26 did not distinguish between the two isofemale lines that were used for mapping and were therefore not pursued. We mapped 25 microsatellites onto the X-chromosome, 10 onto chromosome 2, 7 onto chromosome 3, 13 onto chromosome 4, and 10 onto chromosome 5. Twenty-five more microsatellites were confirmed to be autosomal but could not be mapped because of segregating polymorphism within our lines. Microsatellites were named based on their localizations, where the fifth character of the name was an X if X-linked, A if unmapped autosomal, or a number indicating a specific autosome. The distribution of microsatellites across the chromosomes suggests a possible excess of repetitive sequences on the X-chromosome (27.8% observed vs. 20% expected assuming all chromosomes are similar in size, chi-square test, p = 0.07; 27.8% observed vs. 18.7% expected assuming chromosomes are the same size as D. melanogaster homologous chromosome arms, chi-square test, p = 0.03).

Using two female-parent backcrosses, we constructed a recombinational map of the Drosophila mojavensis genome using 34 of our microsatellites: 13 on the X-chromosome, 7 on chromosome 2, 4 on chromosome 3, 7 on chromosome 4, and 3 on chromosome 5. Recombinational distances are presented in Figure 1. DMOJX040 was not placed in the figure because it was only 0.7 cM from DMOJX030. The recombinational lengths of the chromosomes generally exceed the homologous chromosome arms in D. melanogaster and some other Drosophila species. For example, the X-chromosome in D. mojavensis spanned 130.8 cM, while the X-chromosome in D. melanogaster spans only 73 cM. Even within the repleta species group, D. buzzatii has an X-chromosome that spans 109 cM [17] and D. hydei's X spans 116 cM [12]. Similarly, D. mojavensis chromosome 2 could only be assembled into three pieces that recombine freely from each other. This difference between species in recombinational length most likely indicates an overall greater recombination rate per megabase in D. mojavensis, but we cannot exclude dramatic differences in sequence lengths of the chromosome arms.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Linkage map of the five major chromosomes of Drosophila mojavensis. From left to right, are the X-chromosome, chromosome 2, chromosome 3, chromosome 4, and chromosome 5. Kosambi recombinational distances between markers are on the left of each chromosome, and the microsatellite names are on the right. A question mark appears between markers or groups when markers were assigned to the same chromosomes but freely recombined from each other.

We recombinationally mapped some markers in a second cross because of segregating variation within the lines. Figure 1 presents the most conservative map, where all markers were mapped against each other for any particular chromosome. However, we have some additional information about the linkage of other microsatellites. Specifically, we observed that DMOJ4200 is freely recombining from all the 4-chromosome markers between and including DMOJ4010 and DMOJ4060. Also, the following markers are freely recombining from each other on chromosome 5: DMOJ5100, DMOJ5200, DMOJ5300, and DMOJ5400.

To evaluate the conservation of Muller's elements across 65 million years, we used BLAST [18] to identify segments homologous to the sequences flanking the 65 microsatellites in D. mojavensis that were mapped to chromosome. We identified segments mapped to D. melanogaster chromosomes similar to 23 of the sequences isolated from D. mojavensis (see Table 1). The inferred homology of the arms are as follows (melanogaster:mojavensis): X:X, 2L:3, 2R:5, 3L:4, 3R:2 [19,20]. Based on the BLAST results, all 23 D. mojavensis sequences matched D. melanogaster sequences on the homologous chromosome arms. This observation strongly supports the conservation of Muller's elements between the subgenera Drosophila (D. mojavensis) and Sophophora (D. melanogaster).

Table 1.

Ninety microsatellites mapped in Drosophila mojavensis. Microsatellites assigned to chromosome "A" were autosomal but could not be mapped to a particular autosome because of variation segregating within the lines used for mapping. We present the BLAST expect (E) value in the column after the microsatellite name only for the 23 microsatellites used in the Muller's chromosome element comparison.

Name BLAST E-value Chromosome Size Primers Repeat motif GenBank Accession
DMOJX010 X 132 attgtgttgcgccttagggc
gtgataatttgttgatttgggtgcatgtc
(ca)11 AY578823
DMOJX020 X 142 ctctgccactcaacggacc
ctcttcagtgttgcctagggtatac
(ca)7 AY578824
DMOJX030 X 124 aagctatgcctagttgtcacttcc
caaacggcatttcatataagaatctatctcac
(ag)9 AY578825
DMOJX040 X 147 aggcatgccttagtttgtgtcac
cacacatattaagcattgtattacaatcgtccc
(ac)15 AY578826
DMOJX050 X 143 accaagcaaaagccaattgcac
caaagctttgccggcattagc
(ac)12 AY578827
DMOJX060 X 128 caattgtggagttgcgtttgcac
cacgcatttctgattgaccatacac
(ac)12 AY578828
DMOJX070 1e-19 X 163 gccactcgttgttgtcccta
atagttctttgctctatatgcgtgtg
(ca)4 AY578829
DMOJX080 X 202 ccactccacgttcgcttgac
cacaatgtagagctccctttaatctcc
(ac)14 AY578830
DMOJX090 X 149 ccttcaactttgtcgctccagac
caatcaaagcgaacgtagctcaatg
(ca)9 AY578831
DMOJX100 X 160 tttgtatataaggcggaaaggcgg
gtctgtatataatttaataagttgttacgtaaaagaactcac
(gt)20 AY578832
DMOJX110 2e-09 X 98 cagtggcgctcaaaaggtctg
gggatgtatggggtctatgggtg
(ca)9 AY578833
DMOJX120 X 110 gcctgcatttgtgcatctgc
caagtgtttgccaaagctgcag
(tg)13 AY578834
DMOJX130 X 130 tgggctacacttcagcaaacattc
tcatgtgcaaaggtagccaagc
(ca)11 AY578835
DMOJX500 X 100 caattattgcatagccacgccc
cgagcacttttccaatttttggc
(gt)11 AY578836
DMOJX501 X 136 ctcgagcgaattttcctattggatttc
ccaacgagccatttcctcacg
(ca)6 AY578837
DMOJX502 X 107 attaaagtgcattaaatgacacagccac
ctctgccttcacgtgtgc
(ca)10 AY578838
DMOJX503 X 136 gcgaagaattgcaaatacccttgtag
aagcaaatatacacaacatacacatgtgc
(gt)10 AY578839
DMOJX504 X 126 catcaatctctagaatgcctcacgc
gagtgactcactttaaagcgagctc
(gt)8 AY578840
DMOJX505 0.004 X 128 tcgcttgtttccgtttagtaaccg
tacgcgtatgcgtatgcatgc
(ac)10 AY578841
DMOJX506 2e-15 X 149 actgcctacactgctctgtctc
acaggctttacacatggccaaataac
(tc)16 AY578842
DMOJX507 X 166 ttttctttgcatcggcttagttgc
cacatatggaaatgcagcacgaac
(tc)15 AY578843
DMOJX508 4e-43 X 248 aagcagcctagctgaacagttg
cattgggaagagctgatgtatagacg
(ac)12 AY578844
DMOJX509 X 157 agctgattaacgaagcagatttcgtg
ttccattcatgaaccactcacacatc
(ga)18 AY578845
DMOJX510 X 169 atttggctgctgcgagacg
gatttgtgccactgtgcaatgg
(ag)18 AY578846
DMOJX511 X 177 gcttcagtgagcctcaaatgaaac
tgcagctggcatgggtataag
(ct)16 AY578847
DMOJ2010 2 157 acgagtttgccatgaactggattg
aaagccgaaacttgtattcatttggc
(ac)14 AY578848
DMOJ2020 2 153 attgacttagcgtgtgagcgtg
cgctgtctcatttacataggtcgg
(gt)7 AY578849
DMOJ2030 2 199 tgacgcgccaatcagttgac
gattcaaggtgtcatatctatatgtgtgtagg
(gt)16 AY578850
DMOJ2100 4e-05 2 187 ggcgctcccttaatcacagatac
agcatgtgtctgcttgctgt
(ag)17 AY578851
DMOJ2200 3e-21 2 148 gtcgctccatagagttctacaagtttg
cgcctccaagtaattcacgaagc
(gt)9 AY578852
DMOJ2210 2 139 cccagcaagtgtactctactcaag
tgctgcatcaataaagaaggcaaac
(ca)8 AY578853
DMOJ2220 0.002 2 136 gttggctttggctattggactgag
tgtgcaatgtgactggcaactg
(gt)6 AY578854
DMOJ2300 1e-05 2 114 aattgacagcactccgtggc
gttcagcgccggccttac
(ca)12 AY578855
DMOJ2301 2 158 ctcttagcggcaggtgtcaag
aatcttatcgaaaatatgcaacacgatgg
(caa)11 AY578856
DMOJ2302 8e-17 2 193 ctctcgctgtttctcttgtctcttatac
aactgatttaccgctcgctatacag
(ac)9 AY578857
DMOJ3010 4e-05 3 218 gcccgccggagttcaatag
atgtgtatggccagtgctacattt
(ct)8 AY578858
DMOJ3020 4e-23 3 94 acgtggattacgaacacgagc
tttggccaatttgagcaactgc
(ca)14 AY578859
DMOJ3030 3 91 cctagtttctttggccaccctac
cgcagtgaaacgcatggaaac
(ca)11 AY578860
DMOJ3040 3 94 gtcaggtgtcagcagcagc
gcctcaacagcacctactgag
(ac)12 AY578861
DMOJ3100 3 87 ctgatttgtcaccacagggactc
gctaatcgaagcacacacatgtattcag
(ca)10 AY578862
DMOJ3101 7e-25 3 150 aacggcggcatccgttg
actgtcatcgcacaaatgatttgta
(gt)12 AY578863
DMOJ3102 3 210 ctctctgtagcaaaaggcttttgtaacc
tgctgtgtgcagcacgaac
(ca)11 AY578864
DMOJ4010 4 90 agccagtgcaatgccagc
gcctggaccttgtgggc
(ca)16 AY578865
DMOJ4020 4 121 cagcagctgccttatgtcagc
aataaatcgcagcagccaggac
(ac)10 AY578866
DMOJ4030 7e-05 4 137 gtagttgttgtaggcacgcataca
aatgagaatgagaactggaacggg
(ca)10 AY578867
DMOJ4040 1e-07 4 161 gcaacatgtgctccactcgttc
ttttcccacacttcttgcagcag
(ca)11 AY578868
DMOJ4050 4 196 atcgcatagaaagacactcatacgc
ctggaggcaagggaagtttcg
(ca)9 AY578869
DMOJ4060 4 211 cgagactcgctgataagtaaagcc
gattgtaattttggccgtgcgc
(ac)41 AY578870
DMOJ4100 4 126 cgcagacatatttgtctcccagc
ttcgtagccaagacaaactcacaac
(ga)11 AY578871
DMOJ4200 3e-10 4 120 gcttcaagccttgtgatttgttg
caagaagaacaagcgcattatgcaaa
(ct)24 AY578872
DMOJ4300 4 165 ggaaagaataccaacgcctatggc
gtccgcagacagccagc
(ca)12 AY578873
DMOJ4301 4 133 acatttggctgttacctggcac
ccaatgccagtgagtttctctctc
(ca)12 AY578874
DMOJ4302 2e-42 4 218 gtgtgtgcgtggatgtgttttac
gacagcactgaacagattatagataagcc
(ag)18 AY578875
DMOJ4303 4 174 cacggcaacacttgcagttacc
ccattgctcatagcccgtttacc
(ag)23 AY578876
DMOJ4304 4 171 ggcacattgccacaagtgtac
tctgtgccggaaatcgtcaac
(ga)20 AY578877
DMOJ5010 6e-04 5 117 ggcatagggaccgcagc
gtaaatattcgccaaacacctacatgc
(ac)8 AY578878
DMOJ5020 4e-06 5 144 ctacaggtatgaagaacctgaaccc
acaacagcctacacgcactc
(gt)11 AY578879
DMOJ5100 8e-18 5 156 agacaacttgactgttgctcgc
tgacactgattggtcgctgtg
(gt)8 AY578880
DMOJ5200 2e-26 5 154 tcgcacaactggcgcatg
atttttacagcacgcttaacaagaattttcac
(ca)13 AY578881
DMOJ5300 5 97 gtggtggacatcaaccagcc
tgagccaactttgagcataaattagcc
(ca)9 AY578882
DMOJ5400 5e-08 5 109 cttggatttcagctcagtcgctc
cgccacaatcagtcataggtcc
(gt)10 AY578883
DMOJ5500 5 121 ggaagcgtcgactgcatacc
gtgttgaaacgtatgtgtttgtgcc
(ca)10 AY578884
DMOJ5501 1e-04 5 99 cgtgccacgtaaactcttgcc
gaaggcaattcaattagttttgagagttatccc
(ac)9 AY578885
DMOJ5502 5 115 gcatattgacaaggacgagctgtc
tctgagtgcgtccattactttgtatc
(gt)12 AY578886
DMOJ5503 5 150 gtatacgacatgttggcactgcc
ttgcaagctgggcgtaagc
(tg)10 AY578887
DMOJA500 A 185 gagactgtttgacgcccgc
tcgatagacatgagtttggtctagaaacc
(tg)8 AY578888
DMOJA501 A 140 tcagtagcctctgctacggc
cgaacggaaattatgaactagtcagcc
(tc)30 AY578889
DMOJA502 A 138 ctgaaagttctggcagcaagagt
gtgtaatttagttgttagacgcgattgagag
(ct)14 AY578890
DMOJA503 A 153 taaggctctgtttcgtaactttgcc
ctgtcaatgtgctaaacattgcaacc
(ca)9 AY578891
DMOJA504 A 222 aatcatctgccccctttccac
ggaaaatgatgctcaggcaggt
(ac)13 AY578892
DMOJA505 A 181 ccatagtgcgatgcacgcttc
gccatagcccatagtagccaag
(tg)10 AY578893
DMOJA506 A 147 attaatgcaggccggaaagtcg
gctcgctctgcgtcgttatg
(gt)11 AY578894
DMOJA507 A 134 tcagccgggatgttaactaacttg
atgcttaccagagcgaatggc
(ac)12 AY578895
DMOJA508 A 196 ctctgcgacatgtagactacgc
gataaagttgaacttttactaccgatgcattc
(tg)10 AY578896
DMOJA509 A 186 gctgagaaacaaatttcgcatgcc
tgttgttgtcctttaacgaacgttcc
(tg)18 AY578897
DMOJA510 A 105 cacacagccagacttgacgttag
gcttttgattttgtcatagccattgctaaac
(tg)12 AY578898
DMOJA511 A 162 cttttctggctattacgagagcagc
aaaacataatgtaattgagctgacaaagcaac
(tg)30 AY578899
DMOJA512 A 120 gatgagaaataggcgttgctgtcc
gcatatgatgaaggctgagagctc
(ca)11 AY578900
DMOJA513 A 120 gctcagctaacagaaacaccca
gccgtagctgcagcatct
(tg)13 AY578901
DMOJA514 A 125 atggcgcaactcggtcg
gcagcacatttggctgctg
(gt)12 AY578902
DMOJA515 A 203 gaccgaacagcgcagcc
cacaaacctacataaacaccgcagtc
(ac)11 AY578903
DMOJA516 A 163 ggctgtaccaagcacacactc
cgctcgtgtcgtcgtcttc
(ca)13 AY578904
DMOJA517 A 87 gaaaacagctgcaaacccgtaaag
gctctcttaagcgctcaactatatagac
(ca)15 AY578905
DMOJA518 A 118 gtatgtatgggcatacagcggg
cttggttctatgatatgatgacgtgtct
(ca)7 AY578906
DMOJA519 A 182 atgaataggaatccagccagcg
agcgctttgcgtgcctac
(ca)14 AY578907
DMOJA520 A 164 tttcggcgcaaggtcgtc
ttagcttctttaccggcatcatgc
(gt)8 AY578908
DMOJA521 A 96 ttttgtttaggttttgcgcctaacc
ttttccataatttgtgcgtgtgcc
(ac)9 AY578909
DMOJA522 A 122 cctttcgagtgcctccacaac
gtcccactacatattgctacagctg
(ca)11 AY578910
DMOJA523 A 147 gcgtaagcacagttggactctc
tgtctgcggagttttatgctgtaa
(ct)23 AY578911
DMOJA524 A 135 tcgagagagattcgatcgagagc
cctgtttgcattatgtgggtgtc
(ac)12 AY578912

Conclusions

We have developed and mapped a panel of 90 variable microsatellites for genetic studies in a model system for ecological genetics and speciation: Drosophila mojavensis. Thirty-four of these microsatellites have been placed onto a detailed linkage map of this species. We also confirmed that Muller's chromosome elements were conserved between D. melanogaster and D. mojavensis, species separated by 65 million years of independent evolution, in 23 of 65 sequences tested. Given the long-term interest in this species for studies of adaptation and speciation, the construction of a linkage map and presentation of variable microsatellite sequences will facilitate future work in this area.

Methods

Isolation of microsatellite sequences

We used a modification of Hamilton et al's [21] enrichment technique to increase the proportion of microsatellites in the genomic DNA insert library prior to cloning [see also [22]]. This procedure uses a subtractive hybridization, in which streptavidin-coated magnetic beads and biotinylated oligonucleotide repeats retain single-stranded genomic DNA fragments containing repeat sequences.

Genomic DNA was isolated from approximately 30 D. mojavensis individuals from a mixture of strains using the Puregene™ DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra Systems). Except where indicated, we used reagent concentrations and reaction conditions suggested by Hamilton et al [21]. The enrichment procedure was repeated seven times. For each enrichment, one of the following enzymes was used with NheI to digest Drosophila mojavensis genomic DNA: Sau3AI, BfucI, RsaI, AluI, or HpyCH4III. Linker sequences were ligated to the digested DNA to provide a PCR priming site. We then hybridized the digested, linker-ligated DNA to a biotinylated oligonucleotide repeat motif, either (CA)15 or (AG)15, and recovered the microsatellite-enriched DNA. The DNA was amplified via PCR, and fragments between 300 and 800 bp were recovered from an agarose gel for cloning. We then used the Invitrogen TOPO-TA cloning kit to clone the DNA into plasmids and transform into E. coli. We omitted the chemiluminescent screen and used pUC19 primers to amplify D. mojavensis DNA inserts directly from colonies. Each 50 μl reaction volume contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 20 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 0.5 μM pUC forward and reverse primers, and 1.0 unit Taq polymerase (AmpliTaq, Perkin Elmer). DNA was added by touching a sterile toothpick to a colony and swirling the toothpick into the reaction mix. We used the following thermal profile: 95°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 60 s; 55°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s; rapid thermal ramp to 40°C. PCR products were sequenced with an ABIPrism® Big Dye™ Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit, and products were visualized on ABI sequencers in the LSU Museum of Natural Science, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, or the Department of Biological Sciences' genomics facility.

Fly stocks

Several inbred lines of D. mojavensis were tested to determine the most suitable lines for constructing a microsatellite map based on microsatellite allelic differences between strains, bearing the same chromosomal arrangements, and lack of segregating microsatellite alleles. In the end, we selected the lines A993 (Rancho El Diamante, Sonora) and A924 (St. Rosa Mtns., AZ), obtained from Dr. William J. Etges. These lines were further brother-sister mated for 9–12 generations to ensure thorough inbreeding and a reduction of segregating alleles.

Microsatellite assay conditions

We designed two primers for each microsatellite-bearing sequence, one bearing an M13(-29) tail. A 10 μL PCR reaction was then performed using 0.5 μM of each primer, 1.0 μL of dNTPs, 1.0 μL of 10X PCR buffer (100 mM Tris pH 8.3, 500 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2), 0.4 μL of IRDye (LiCor), 1U Taq DNA polymerase, and 0.5 μL from a single fly DNA preparation (Puregene). We sometimes added 1.0 μL of 10 mM MgCl2 to the reaction or more polymerase to optimize the results of the PCR. A touchdown PCR cycle was performed [23], and amplifications were visualized on acrylamide gels on our LiCor DNA analyzer.

Assignment to linkage groups

Virgin females and males of the A993 and A924 lines were crossed and offspring reared. DNA was isolated from the parents and progeny using the Puregene™ DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra Systems). We determined if markers differentiating the lines were X-linked or autosomal by comparing the F1 males to the F1 females and parent strains. For X-linked markers, males consistently bore one allele while females consistently bore two. Autosomal markers were further tested using 20 progeny of a male-parent backcross. Because there is no recombination in Drosophila males, the offspring all inherited a nonrecombinant chromosome from one of the original lines. By comparing genotypes across the male-parent backcross progeny, markers were assigned to linkage groups. We also used the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool [BLAST: [18]] to identify putatively homologous sequences in D. melanogaster. Sequences bearing an expect (E) value below 0.01 were scored, as E-values are nearly identical to probability (p) values in that range.

Recombinational mapping within linkage groups

Virgin F1 females (progeny of the cross described in "Assigning to linkage groups") were backcrossed to males of one of the pure lines (A924). To ascertain the recombinational distances between the markers on each chromosome, we genotyped the parents and 200 progeny with each marker previously assigned to a linkage group. Recombinational distances were estimated in Kosambi centiMorgans using Mapmaker [24].

Authors' contributions

RS maintained all fly cultures and performed all reactions and analyses involved in the recombinational mapping of microsatellites. SDS and MAFN produced the microsatellite genomic libraries, sequenced the clones, and designed the primers. All authors contributed to the preparation of this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Science Foundation grants 9980797, 0211007, and 0314552, and Louisiana Board of Regents Governor's Biotechnology Initiative grant 005 to MAFN and a Sigma Xi grant-in-aid of research to SDS. We thank William J. Etges for providing fly stocks and moral support, Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos, Christy Henzler, and three referees for constructive comments on this manuscript, and Lisa Burk for technical assistance.

Contributor Information

Regina Staten, Email: rstaten@lsu.edu.

Sheri Dixon Schully, Email: sdixon1@lsu.edu.

Mohamed AF Noor, Email: mnoor@lsu.edu.

References

  1. Ruiz A, Heed WB, Wasserman M. Evolution of the mojavensis cluster of cactophilic Drosophila with descriptions of two new species. J Hered. 1990;81:30–42. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Etges WJ. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution. 1992;46:1945–1950. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zouros E. The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. Genetics. 1981;97:703–718. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wasserman M, Koepfer HR. Character displacement for sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution. 1977;31:812–823. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb01073.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Etges WJ, Ahrens MA. Premating isolation Is determined by larval-rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolated populations. Am Nat. 2001;158:585–598. doi: 10.1086/323587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zouros E. The chromosomal basis of viability in interspecific hybrids between Drosophila arizonensis and Drosophila mojavensis. Can J Genet Cytol. 1981;23:65–72. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pantazidis AC, Galanopoulos VK, Zouros E. An autosomal factor from Drosophila arizonae restores spermatogenesis in Drosophila mojavensis males carrying the D. arizonae Y chromosome. Genetics. 1993;134:309–318. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller GT, Starmer WT, Pitnick S. Quantitative genetic analysis of among-population variation in sperm and female sperm-storage organ length in Drosophila mojavensis. Genet Res Camb. 2003;81:213–220. doi: 10.1017/S0016672303006190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pitnick S, Miller GT, Schneider K, Markow TA. Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Proc Roy Soc Lond B. 2003;270:1507–1512. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ross CL, Dyer KA, Erez T, Miller SJ, Jaenike J, Markow TA. Rapid divergence of microsatellite abundance among species of Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20:1143–1157. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Muller HJ. Bearings of the Drosophila work on systematics. In: Huxley J, editor. In New Systematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1940. pp. 185–268. [Google Scholar]
  12. Powell JR. Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology: The Drosophila Model. New York: Oxford University Press. 1997.
  13. Whiting JH, Pliley MD, Farmer JL, Jeffery DE. In situ hybridization analysis of chromosomal homologies in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis. Genetics. 1989;122:99–109. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Papaceit M, Juan E. Chromosomal homologies between Drosophila lebanonensis and D. melanogaster determined by in situ hybridization. Chromosoma. 1993;102:361–368. doi: 10.1007/BF00661280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallego P, Juan E, Papaceit M. Chromosomal homologies between Drosophila melanogaster and D. funebris determined by in-situ hybridization. Chromosome Res. 1999;7:331–339. doi: 10.1023/A:1009207812569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ranz JM, Segarra C, Ruiz A. Chromosomal homology and molecular organization of Muller's elements D and E in the Drosophila repleta species group. Genetics. 1997;145:281–295. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.2.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schafer DJ, Fredline DK, Knibb WR, Green MM, Barker JSF. Genetics and linkage mapping of Drosophila buzzatii. J Hered. 1993;84:188–194. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wasserman M. Evolution of the repleta group. In: Ashburner M, Carson HL, Thompson JN, editor. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila 3b. London: Academic Press; 1982. pp. 61–139. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wasserman M. Cytological evolution of the Drosophila repleta species group. In: Krimbas CB, Powell JR, editor. In Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1992. pp. 455–552. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamilton MB, Pincus EL, DiFiore A, Fleischer RC. Universal linker and ligation procedures for construction of genomic DNA libraries enriched for microsatellites. BioTechniques. 1999;27:500–507. doi: 10.2144/99273st03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kandpal RP, Kandpal G, Weissman SM. Construction of libraries enriched for sequence repeats and jumping clones, and hybridization selection for region-specific arkers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:88–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Palumbi SR. Nucleic Acids II: The Polymerase Chain Reaction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, editor. In Molecular Systematics. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc; 1996. pp. 205–247. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg L. MAPMAKER: An interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987;1:174–181. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES