Abstract
Roots are reported to be plastic in response to nutrient supply, but relatively little is known about their development in response to magnesium (Mg) availability. Here, we showed the influence of both low and high Mg availability on the development of roots including root hairs and highlighted insights into the regulatory role of Mg availability on root hair development and its mechanism in Arabidopsis with combining our published research. Mg concentration in roots decreased quickly after the removal of Mg from the nutrient solution and increased progressively with increasing exogenous Mg supply in the media. However, transcriptome analysis suggested that Mg starvation did not alter the expression of most genes potentially involved in the transport. Primary root elongation and lateral root formation in Arabidopsis were not influenced by low Mg but inhibited by high Mg after one-week period. Moreover, low Mg availability significantly increased but high Mg reduced the initiation, density and length of root hairs, which through the characterized Ca2+ and ROS signal transduction pathways. More physiological mechanisms underlying Mg-regulated root development remain to be elucidated in future researches.
Keywords: Magnesium, root system, root hairs, Ca2+, reactive oxygen species
Magnesium (Mg), the largest hydrated radius (0.428 nm), the smallest ionic radius (0.072 nm) and the highest charge density,1 is an essential element for a vast number of fundamental biochemical processes in all living cells in plants. Concentrations of Mg in soil solutions lie between 0.125 and 8.5 mM,2 depending on soil texture and cation exchange capacity of the soil,3 the concentration of competing cations, water availability or excessive leaching, crop cultivation and fertilizer regime.4,5 However, long-term unbalanced crop fertilization practice neglecting Mg depletion of soils and cation competition and subsequent leaching lead to Mg deficiency in plants, decreased productivity and quality in agriculture practice worldwide.6
On the other hand, like other metals, Mg at high levels can deteriorate soil chemical and biological properties, and thus change the colonization and growth of plants. Large-scale magnesite mining activities drastically deteriorated the surrounding environment. In particular, Mg-rich dust derived from mining and calcination has led to intense vegetation and soil damage.7 Hazards of excessive Mg intake to human health include changes in mental status, nausea, diarrhea, appetite loss, muscle weakness, breathing difficulty, extremely low blood pressure, and irregular heartbeat.8 In the past decade, the importance of Mg in plant growth especially in plant development was underestimated.
Plants display an array of physiological responses to Mg availability, including morphological and architectural responses of the root system. The alteration of root architecture maybe a powerful green vehicle for the development of crop plants with an efficient Mg acquisition ability. Although evidence now exists for the influence of supply of most major- and micro-nutrients for the formation of roots,9-13 there is relatively little attention has been paid on root growth in response to Mg excess compared with Mg deficiency. In recent years, the global transcriptional response to Mg imbalance has been studied by microarray technologies. For example, genome scale studies of the model species Arabidopsis under Mg depletion14,15 or excess16 have allowed unbiased views of the responses to Mg imbalance. The molecular targets among long-term (4-d and 7-d) under low Mg and high Mg by transcriptome sequencing technology (RNA-Seq) was also identified in our recent study.17 These transcriptome profiling was conducted to detect genes whose expression could be significantly changed by Mg availability during root and root hair development. It opens up the opportunity of understanding on how plant root development in response to Mg availability and provides an alternative route of identifying genes responsible for sensing and signaling Mg nutrient limitations or excess. This report aims at: 1) evaluating the available knowledge on the influence of Mg nutrient on root growth and 2) highlighting insights into regulation of Mg availability on root and root hair development and its mechanism in Arabidopsis with respect to combining our published research of Niu et al. (2014).17
Root development response to Mg availability
In root cells, Mg is critical nutrient required for numerous fundamental biochemical processes, including energy generation, enzyme activation/inactivation, nucleic acid synthesis, nucleic acid folding, carbohydrate metabolism and the chemical catalysis of RNA splicing.18,19 Therefore, impaired root absorption of Mg or root dysfunction from necrosis resulting in Mg deficiency will cause disruption of energy metabolism and biomass allocation. It has been reported that roots Mg concentration decreased quickly when removed Mg from the nutrient solution but maintained a constant low value,14 indicating mobilization and redistribution mechanisms between organs. Previous researches reported that Mg deprivation (20 g/m3) for 12 d severely reduced the root biomass of bean (Phaseolus vulgatis) plants for accumulation of sugars and starch in leaves.20,21 Damm et al. (2011)22 suggested that low Mg availability together with high K supply enhanced the root-shoot ratio prior to any visible sign of Mg deficiency symptoms in rice leaves. This may be connected with the event that under Mg deficiency, carbon is more likely to be assigned to the leaves instead of the root. In the present study five-week-old Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) plants grown hydroponically were supplying with Mg treatment 1 μM MgSO4 + 1000 μM Na2SO4 (L), 1000 μM MgSO4 (Ctro), and 10000 μM MgSO4 (H) during the one-week period. At the end of the treatment, we showed that root fresh biomass decreased progressively with increasing Mg supply (Fig. 1). Furthermore, as compared with normal Mg, root-shoot ratio and total root surface area were greater in both low Mg and high Mg supplied plants but greater that of the low Mg-supplied plants (Data not shown). Further, it is suggested that root phenotype in Arabidopsis plants shown in Figure 1A and C solely resulting from Mg depletion and not from sulfur depletion (or both combined Mg and S depletion) in this study.
Figure 1. Magnesium (Mg) regulates root development in Arabidopsisthaliana. Light microscope images (A) of wild-type Arabidopsisthaliana seedlings grown in agar-medium supplied with 1 μM MgSO4 + 1000 μM Na2SO4 (Low Mg), 1000 μM MgSO4 (Control), and 10000 μM MgSO4 (High Mg) for 7 d. Five-week-old wild-type Arabidopsisthaliana plants grown hydroponically were subjected to Mg treatment 1 μM MgSO4 + 1000 μM Na2SO4 (Low Mg), 1000 μM MgSO4 (Control), and 10000 μM MgSO4 (High Mg) during a 1-wk period. At day 7 root morphology (B) and root fresh biomass (C) were taken and measured. Data are means ± SD (n = 5), and means followed by a same letter (italics) are not significantly different at P < 0.05 in (C).
Recent excellent studies of Cristescu et al. (2013)23 and Gruber et al. (2013)24 have considered the systematic and exquisite strategies to study how plants adjust their root structure and morphology including total root length, primary root length, lateral roots number and length, first-order lateral roots (1° LRs) and second-order lateral roots (2° LRs) in response to Mg concentration. However, these publications do not specifically consider the effect of Mg supply on the root morphology with respects of root hair formation and elongation. Furthermore, Gruber et al. (2013)24 pointed out that although shoot growth was negatively affected by decreased S supply, the deficiency of S had relatively little influence on the morphology of roots. Therefore, in our present study, we mainly focus on analysis of primary root elongation and lateral root formation in response to Mg supply in the media. As shown in Figure 1A, primary root elongation and lateral root formation in Arabidopsis were not influenced by low Mg but inhibited by high Mg after one-week period (Fig. 1), suggesting a suppression of high Mg on root development. Therefore, root growth alternation may represent the earliest morphological response to low Mg conditions. This result is supported by the findings of other studies presenting that the absence of an effect on the root system of sugar beet,25 Arabidopsis26 and rice27 grown hydroponically.
Hermans et al. (2010) identified early transcriptomic responses of Arabidopsis to Mg deficiency, and found that the highest number of regulated genes was observed first in the roots.15 However, we cannot ignored the fact that the number of –Mg responsive genes in leaves become gradually more important after 8 h and even after one week.14 Fortunately, at least 2% genes in roots were changed in response to Mg limitation. Moreover, replenishment of Mg to the nutrient solution restored the initial patterns of gene expression for one-fifth of the transcripts in the leaves and half in the roots within 24 h,15 suggesting that root development could be influenced by Mg concentration during this period. Verbruggen and Hermans (2013)28 reported that none of the root parameters are significantly different between Mg-deficient and Mg-adequate plants at the time of treatment using a hydroponics system. However, they pointed out that relative impact on the root or shoot growth depended on the plant species and the system. Besides, it is probable that there is a degree of difference between the effects of Mg depletion (without Mg added) and low Mg availability (micromolar Mg added on present study) on root development and genes expressions. Incidentally, Mg depletion did not alter the expression of most genes potentially involved in the transport and distribute of Mg ion.14,29 These results were clearly different from reports on N, P and K inadequate, which have an definite impact on the root transcriptome at an early stage of induction, and eventually on root morphology.30-32 However, few publications did specifically consider the mechanism strategies on how plants adjust their root structure and morphology in response to altered Mg conditions and the mechanism underlying this process deserve to be elucidated.
Root hair development under control of Mg availability
Our previous published study had first investigated the influence of Mg availability on root hair development in Arabidopsis grown in different Mg concentrations ranging from 0.5 μM to 10 mM.17 It is shown that the development of root hairs of Arabidopsis increased progressively with decreasing Mg supply after 7-d, which was related with the initiation of new trichoblast files and likelihood of trichoblasts to form hairs. Interestingly, the increasing concentration of Mg variation trend is consistent with the decrease of root hairs respond to Mg availability. Moreover, the growth of root hairs of mrs2–1mrs2–5 mutant affected in Mg transport and homeostasis was not altered by Mg deficiency but was tardily inhibited by high Mg, suggesting that internal Mg was partly related to the growth of root hairs but the mechanism underlying this process remains to be elucidated. .Addition, increasing MgSO4 supply increased the concentration of total Mg and decreased the concentration of Ca in both roots and shoots irrespective of anion form supplied with Mg, such as sulfur or chloride. Surprisingly, there is no significant difference in S concentration in the roots in Arabidopsis grown in the medium containing SO42- concentration ranging from 250 to 10250 μM. This is maybe an alternative explanation on why sulfur has relatively little influence on the morphology of the root.
We predominately compared with previous root epidermis gene transcriptome data sets (Bruex et al. 2012)33 and iRootHair database (a comprehensive root hair genomics database) from Kwasniewski et al. (2013).34 Interesting outcomes of this global transcriptomics analysis are here identifying the differences in the expression of genes functioning in root hair or epidermis development under Mg treatments, which finally help us define a molecular mechanism of root hair development in response to Mg availability.17 It is found a greater fraction of cell wall organization and morphogenetic H-genes genes were downregulated by high Mg but upregulated by low Mg. Finally, a model is proposed on the target points of Mg in the signaling events that lead to the growth of root hair tips (Fig. 2). This simplified model is based on those proposed by Foreman et al. (2003)35 and Takeda et al. (2008).36 To sum up, it is possible that low Mg first increases while high Mg reduces ROS production through the activation (low Mg) or inhibition of NADPH oxidase activity.17 Then ROS activate Ca2+-channels at the plasma membrane and regulate cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in the apex of the root hair tip. These endogenous signals then modulate the downstream genetic elements of a number of genes and transcription factors (e.g. LRX1, EXP18, RHS12, RHS13, RHS15, RHS19, PRP1, and PRP3) conferring cell wall organization and the growth of root hair tips.
Figure 2. Schematic model showing the potential target points of Mg availability in the signaling events that lead to the growth of root-hair tips. Solid arrows indicate links established in the induction of root-hair development and broken arrows represent already established links in other systems but yet to be demonstrated in the growth of root-hair tips. Abbreviations: ROS, reactive oxygen species; RHD2P, RHD2 with Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation. NADPH oxidase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase; cCa2+, cytosolic Ca2+ concentration; PM, plasma membrane.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Key Project on Science and Technology of China (2012BAC17B02), the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture (201103004), and the Project of Scientific Emissary of Zhejiang Province (2012T2T209).
References
- 1.Bose J, Babourina O, Rengel Z. Role of magnesium in alleviation of aluminium toxicity in plants. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:2251–64. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barber SA. Soil nutrient bioavailability: a mechanistic approach. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hariadi Y, Shabala S. Screening broad beans (Vicia faba) for magnesium deficiency. II. Photosynthetic performance and leaf bioelectrical responses. Funct Plant Biol. 2004;31:539–49. doi: 10.1071/FP03202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Broadley MR, Hammond JP, King GJ, Astley D, Bowen HC, Meacham MC, Mead A, Pink DA, Teakle GR, Hayden RM, et al. Shoot calcium and magnesium concentrations differ between subtaxa, are highly heritable, and associate with potentially pleiotropic loci in Brassica oleracea. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:1707–20. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.114645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mikkelsen R. Soil and fertilizer magnesium. Better Crops. 2010;94:26–8. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bennett WF. Nutrients deficiencies & toxicities in crop plants. St Pau: The American Phythopathological Society Press, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kautz G, Zimmer M, Zach P, Kulfan J, Topp W. Suppression of soil microorganisms by emissions of a magnesite plant in the Slovak Republic. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2001;125:121–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1005272000832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Swaminathan R. Magnesium metabolism and its disorders. Clin Biochem Rev. 2003;24:47–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gilroy S, Jones DL. Through form to function: root hair development and nutrient uptake. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:56–60. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01551-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Williamson LC, Ribrioux SP, Fitter AH, Leyser HM. Phosphate availability regulates root system architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:875–82. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.2.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ma Z, Baskin TI, Brown KM, Lynch JP. Regulation of root elongation under phosphorus stress involves changes in ethylene responsiveness. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:1381–90. doi: 10.1104/pp.012161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lynch JP, Ochoa IE, Blair MW. QTL analysis of adventitious root formation in common bean under contrasting phosphorus availability. Crop Sci. 2006;46:1609–21. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.12-0446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tyburski J, Dunajska K, Tretyn A. A role for redox factors in shaping root architecture under phosphorus deficiency. Plant Signal Behav. 2010;5:64–6. doi: 10.4161/psb.5.1.10199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hermans C, Vuylsteke M, Coppens F, Cristescu SM, Harren FJM, Inzé D, Verbruggen N. Systems analysis of the responses to long-term magnesium deficiency and restoration in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2010;187:132–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hermans C, Vuylsteke M, Coppens F, Craciun A, Inzé D, Verbruggen N. Early transcriptomic changes induced by magnesium deficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana reveal the alteration of circadian clock gene expression in roots and the triggering of abscisic acid-responsive genes. New Phytol. 2010;187:119–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Visscher AM, Paul AL, Kirst M, Guy CL, Schuerger AC, Ferl RJ. Growth performance and root transcriptome remodeling of Arabidopsis in response to Mars-like levels of magnesium sulfate. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Niu Y, Chai R, Liu L, Jin G, Liu M, Tang C, Zhang Y. Magnesium availability regulates the development of root hairs in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Cell Environ. 2014 doi: 10.1111/pce.12362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kirkby EA, Mengel K. The role of magnesium in plant nutrition. Zeitschr Pflanzenernähr Bodenk. 1976;139:209–22. doi: 10.1002/jpln.19761390208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wilkinson SR, Welch RM, Mayland HF, Grunes DL. Magnesium in plants: uptake, distribution, func1tion, and utilization by man and animals. In: Sigel H, eds. Metal ions in biological systems. New York: Mercel Dekker, 1990; 26: 37-47. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cakmak I, Hengeler C, Marschner H. Changes in phloem export of sucrose in leaves in response to phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency in bean plants. J Exp Bot. 1994;45:1251–7. doi: 10.1093/jxb/45.9.1251. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cakmak I, Hengeler C, Marschner H. Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and carbohydrates in bean plants suffering from phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency. J Exp Bot. 1994;45:1245–50. doi: 10.1093/jxb/45.9.1245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Damm C, Mallembakam MR, Voronov A, Peukert W. Production of filled hydrogels by mechanochemically induced polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;120:799–807. doi: 10.1002/app.33102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cristescu SM, Mandon J, Arslanov D, De Pessemier J, Hermans C, Harren FJ. Current methods for detecting ethylene in plants. Ann Bot. 2013;111:347–60. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gruber BD, Giehl RF, Friedel S, von Wirén N. Plasticity of the Arabidopsis root system under nutrient deficiencies. Plant Physiol. 2013;163:161–79. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.218453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hermans C, Bourgis F, Faucher M, Strasser RJ, Delrot S, Verbruggen N. Magnesium deficiency in sugar beets alters sugar partitioning and phloem loading in young mature leaves. Planta. 2005;220:541–9. doi: 10.1007/s00425-004-1376-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hermans C, Verbruggen N. Physiological characterization of Mg deficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:2153–61. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ding Y, Luo W, Xu G. Characterisation of magnesium nutrition and interaction of magnesium and potassium in rice. Ann Appl Biol. 2006;149:111–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00080.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Verbruggen N, Hermans C. Physiological and molecular responses to magnesium nutritional imbalance in plants. Plant Soil. 2013;368:87–99. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1589-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gebert M, Meschenmoser K, Svidová S, Weghuber J, Schweyen R, Eifler K, Lenz H, Weyand K, Knoop V. A root-expressed magnesium transporter of the MRS2/MGT gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana allows for growth in low-Mg2+ environments. Plant Cell. 2009;21:4018–30. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.070557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Armengaud P, Breitling R, Amtmann A. The potassium-dependent transcriptome of Arabidopsis reveals a prominent role of jasmonic acid in nutrient signaling. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2556–76. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.046482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shin R, Schachtman DP. Hydrogen peroxide mediates plant root cell response to nutrient deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:8827–32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401707101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Iyer-Pascuzzi A, Simpson J, Herrera-Estrella L, Benfey PN. Functional genomics of root growth and development in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009;12:165–71. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bruex A, Kainkaryam RM, Wieckowski Y, Kang YH, Bernhardt C, Xia Y, Zheng X, Wang JY, Lee MM, Benfey P, et al. A gene regulatory network for root epidermis cell differentiation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kwasniewski M, Nowakowska U, Szumera J, Chwialkowska K, Szarejko I. iRootHair: a comprehensive root hair genomics database. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:28–35. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.206441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Foreman J, Demidchik V, Bothwell JHF, Mylona P, Miedema H, Torres MA, Linstead P, Costa S, Brownlee C, Jones JD, et al. Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth. Nature. 2003;422:442–6. doi: 10.1038/nature01485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Takeda S, Gapper C, Kaya H, Bell E, Kuchitsu K, Dolan L. Local positive feedback regulation determines cell shape in root hair cells. Science. 2008;319:1241–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1152505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


