Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1976 Feb;13(2):457–463. doi: 10.1128/iai.13.2.457-463.1976

Virulence factors involved in the intraperitoneal infection of adult mice with Vibrio cholerae.

E R Eubanks, M N Guentzel, L J Berry
PMCID: PMC420633  PMID: 1262061

Abstract

Nonmotile mutants of Vibrio cholerae isolated from Ogawa, Inaba, and El Tor strains were less virulent than parent wild types when administered to adult mice intraperitoneally. The cells were suspended in 5% hog gastric mucin. Antitoxic immunity did not protect mice against this type of challenge, but a ribosomally derived vaccine did. Intraperitoneal injection of 10 50% lethal doses of enterotoxin (based on intravenous doses) was without toxic manifestations as were 10(10) heat-killed vibrios similarly administered, regardless of strain. Virulent organisms killed with formalin or ultraviolet irradiation were significantly lethal at a dose of 10(10) cells. Mice made tolerant to endotoxin were protected from death caused by an injection of 3 X 10(10) boiled cells, but they did not survive an injection of formalin-killed cells. It is believed that the cause of death in this animal model of cholera is dependent, at least in part, on a toxic heat-labile moiety closely associated with the vibrios.

Full text

PDF
457

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Callahan L. T., 3rd, Ryder R. C., Richardson S. H. Biochemistry of vibrio cholerae virulence. II. Skin permeability factor-cholera enterotoxin production in a chemically defined medium. Infect Immun. 1971 Nov;4(5):611–618. doi: 10.1128/iai.4.5.611-618.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guentzel M. N., Berry L. J. Motility as a virulence factor for Vibrio cholerae. Infect Immun. 1975 May;11(5):890–897. doi: 10.1128/iai.11.5.890-897.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guentzel M. N., Berry L. J. Protection of suckling mice from experimental cholera by maternal immunization: comparison of the efficacy of whole-cell, ribosomal-derived, and enterotoxin immunogens. Infect Immun. 1974 Jul;10(1):167–172. doi: 10.1128/iai.10.1.167-172.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jensen R., Gregory B., Naylor J., Actor P. Isolation of protective somatic antigen from Vibrio cholerae (Ogawa) ribosomal preparations. Infect Immun. 1972 Aug;6(2):156–161. doi: 10.1128/iai.6.2.156-161.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Neoh S. H., Rowley D. The antigens of Vibrio cholerae involved in the vibriocidal action of antibody and complement. J Infect Dis. 1970 May;121(5):505–513. doi: 10.1093/infdis/121.5.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pike R. M., Chandler C. H. Partial purification and properties of somatic antigen spontaneously released from Vibrio cholerae. Infect Immun. 1975 Jul;12(1):187–192. doi: 10.1128/iai.12.1.187-192.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pitkin D., Actor P. Immunity to Vibrio cholerae in the mouse. I. Passive protection of newborn mice. Infect Immun. 1972 Apr;5(4):428–432. doi: 10.1128/iai.5.4.428-432.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yefimtseva E. P., Yermolyeva Z. V., Zykin L. F., Gurevitch E. I. Chemical composition of some cellular structures of Vibrio cholerae. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1972;16(4):398–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES