An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A
.gov website belongs to an official
government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you've safely
connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
information only on official, secure websites.
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:
PMC Disclaimer
|
PMC Copyright Notice
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 23.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2014 Aug 20;514(7523):503–507. doi: 10.1038/nature13633
Diabetes Recovery By Age-Dependent Conversion of Pancreatic δ-Cells
Into Insulin Producers
The publisher's version of this article is available at Nature
Abstract
Total or near-total loss of insulin-producing β-cells is a situation found
in diabetes (Type 1, T1D) 1,2. Restoration of insulin production in T1D is
thus a major medical challenge. We previously observed in mice in which β-cells are
completely ablated that the pancreas reconstitutes new insulin-producing cells in absence
of autoimmunity 3. The process involves
the contribution of islet non-β-cells; specifically, glucagon-producing
α-cells begin producing insulin by a process of reprogramming
(transdifferentiation) without proliferation 3. Here we studied the influence of age on β-cell reconstitution
from heterologous islet cells after near-total β-cell loss. We found that
senescence does not alter α-cell plasticity: α-cells can reprogram to
produce insulin from puberty through adulthood, and also in aged individuals, even a
long-time after β-cell loss. In contrast, prior to puberty there is no detectable
α-cell conversion, although β-cell reconstitution after injury is more
efficient, always leading to diabetes recovery; it occurs through a newly discovered
mechanism: the spontaneous en masse reprogramming of somatostatin-producing
δ-cells. The younglings display “somatostatin-to-insulin”
δ-cell conversion, involving de-differentiation, proliferation and re-expression of
islet developmental regulators. This juvenile adaptability relies, at least in part, upon
combined action of FoxO1 and downstream effectors. Restoration of insulin producing-cells
from non-β-cell origins is thus enabled throughout life via δ- or
α-cell spontaneous reprogramming. A landscape with multiple intra-islet cell
interconversion events is emerging, thus offering new perspectives.
To determine how ageing affects the mode and efficiency of β-cell
reconstitution after β-cell loss, we administered diphtheria toxin (DT) to adult
(2-month-old) or aged (1-and 1.5-year-old) RIP-DTR mice, whose β-cells
bear DT receptors 3, and followed them for up
to 14 months. Collectively, we found that α-to-β cell conversion is the main
mechanism of insulin cell generation after massive β-cell loss in adult post-pubertal
mice, whether middle-aged or very old, and α-cells are progressively recruited into
insulin production with time (Extended Data Fig.1; Supp. Tables S1-5).
In this study we focused on the regeneration potential during early postnatal life by
inducing β-cell ablation before weaning, at 2 weeks of age (Fig. 1a). We found that prepubescent mice rapidly recover from diabetes
after near-total β-cell loss: four months later all younglings were almost
normoglycemic, thus displaying a faster recovery relative to adults (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig.2a,b; see
Extended Data Fig.1a).
Histologically, 99% of the β-cells were lost at 2 weeks following DT
administration (Fig. 1c). The β-cell number
increased by 45-fold 4 months after ablation, representing 23% of the normal age-matched
β-cell mass (Fig. 1c; Supp. Table S6) and correlating with
normoglycemia recovery 1.
All animals remained normoglycemic during the rest of their life (Supp. Table S6). Mice were neither
intolerant to glucose nor insulin resistant during the period of analysis, up to 15 months
after injury (Extended Data Fig. 2c-e).
We investigated whether the new insulin+ cells were reprogrammed
α-cells, as in adults, using Glucagon-rtTA; TetO-Cre;
R26-YFP; RIP-DTR pups (Fig. 1d). We
observed that almost no insulin+ cell co-expressed YFP or glucagon (Supp. Table S7), indicating that
α-cells do not reprogram in younglings.
We further explored the age-dependency of rescue after near-total β-cell loss.
To this aim, normoglycemic 5-month-old mice, which had recovered from β-cell loss at 2
weeks of age, were re-administered DT to ablate the regenerated insulin+ cells. One
month following the second ablation, 30% of the insulin-containing cells also contained
glucagon (Extended Data Fig.2f; Supp. Table S8), like
β-cell-ablated adults (Extended Data Fig. 1k),
confirming that the pre-pubertal regeneration mechanism is restricted temporally.
We measured proliferation rates at different time-points during 2 months of
regeneration. The proportion of Ki67-labeled insulin+ cells was very low (Extended Data Fig.2g; Supp. Table S9), indicating that neither escaping β-cells nor
regenerated insulin+ cells proliferate during this period. However, there was a
transient 3.5-fold increase in the number of insular Ki67+ cells 2 weeks after
ablation, unlike in adult animals (Extended Data Fig.2h;
Supp. Table S10). Replicating cells
were hormone-negative, chromogranin A-negative, and were not lineage-traced to either
α- or escaping β-cells (Extended Data
Fig.2i,j).
Coincident with the peak of islet cell proliferation we noticed in pups a 4.5-fold
decrease in the number of somatostatin-producing δ-cells (from 13 to 3
δ-cells/islet section; Extended Data Fig.3a; Supp. Table S11) and a 76-fold decrease
of somatostatin transcripts (Extended Data
Fig.3b), without indication of increased islet cell death. We therefore
lineage-traced δ-cells and observed that regenerated insulin-producing cells were
dedifferentiated δ-cells. At 2 months of age in Somatostatin-Cre; R26-YFP;
RIP-DTR mice, about 81% of δ-cells were YFP+ in the absence of
β-cell ablation, whereas α- and β-cells were labeled at background levels
(0.9% for β-cells and 0.2% for α-cells; Extended
Data Fig.3c,d, Supp. Table
S12). During β-cell reconstitution in pups, 2 weeks after β-cell
ablation, 80% of YFP+ cells were proliferating (Ki67+) and
somatostatin-negative (Fig. 2a,b; Supp. Table S13), while most
Ki67+ cells were YFP-labeled (85%; Supp. Table S14).
These observations suggest that in β-cell-ablated pre-pubertal mice most
δ-cells undergo a loss of somatostatin expression and enter the cell cycle.
We further investigated the fate of proliferating dedifferentiated δ-cells.
At 1.5 months post-ablation, most insulin+ cells expressed YFP (90%), indicating
their δ-cell origin (Fig. 2c,d; Supp. Table S15). Furthermore, in
contrast to non-ablated age-matched controls, where all YFP+ cells were
somatostatin+ (>99%), about half of YFP+ cells were
insulin+ after 1.5 months of regeneration (45%; Fig. 2e; Supp. Table S16).
This reveals that half of the progeny of dedifferentiated δ-cells becomes insulin
expressers. Bihormonal somatostatin+/insulin+ cells were rare (Supp. Table S17).
Combined, these observations show that at the cell population level, each
dedifferentiated δ-cell yields one insulin expresser cell and one
somatostatin+ cell(Extended Data Fig.4).
We confirmed with two other assays that regeneration and diabetes recovery in
juvenile mice are δ-cell-dependent: by inducing β-cell destruction with
streptozotocin (STZ) instead of DT (Extended Data
Fig.5a-c), and by co-ablating β- and δ-cells simultaneously in
Somatostatin-Cre; R26-YFP; R26-iDTR; RIP-DTR pups. In absence of
δ-cells there was no insulin+ cell regeneration, and no recovery (Fig. 2f).
In adults, δ-cells neither de-differentiated nor proliferated following
β-cell ablation (Extended Data. Fig.5d,e; Supp. Table S20). Nevertheless, like
α-cells, a few δ-cells reprogrammed into insulin production, so that after 1.5
month of regeneration 17% of the rare insulin-producing cells were YFP+, i.e.
δ-cell-derived (Extended Data Fig. 5f-h; Supp. Tables S21, S22).
By transplanting Somatostatin-Cre; R26-YFP; RIP-DTR juvenile islets
into adult wild-type mice we observed that, following β-cell ablation, the newly formed
insulin+ cells were reprogrammed δ-cells, thus showing that the
pup-specific regeneration is intrinsic to islets (Extended Data
Fig.6).
Contrary to β-cells in age-matched adult mice, δ-cell-derived
insulin+ cells replicated transiently (Extended
Data Fig.7a; Supp. Table
S23); the β-cell mass thus reached between 30% to 69% of the normal values, and
remained stable for life (above, Supp. Table
S6).
We characterized the δ-cell-derived insulin+ cells at the gene
expression level by qPCR. We first compared islets isolated 2 weeks after β-cell
ablation or after recovery (4 months post-DT), with age-matched control islets. Expression of
all the β-cell-specific markers tested was robustly increased in recovered mice (Extended Data Fig.7b). We also compared regenerated
insulin+ cells with native β-cells using sorted mCherry+ cells
obtained from either recovered or unablated age-matched (4.5-month-old)
insulin-mCherry; RIP-DTR mice (Extended Data
Fig.7c). The two cell populations were very similar (Extended Data Fig.7d), yet the δ-cell-derived replicating β-cells
displayed apotent downregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors and regulators (Extended Data Fig.7e,f). This suggests that reconstituted
insulin+ cells are like β-cells with transient proliferation capacity.
Future studies will establish whether reconstituted (δ)β-like cells are true
equivalents to native β-cells.
qPCR and lineage-tracing analyses on islets isolated from pups at different
regeneration time-points, together with Ngn3 KO induction after β-cell
ablation, revealed that Ngn3transcription is required for the δ-to-insulin+
cell conversion to occur (Extended Data Fig.8a-k, Supp. Tables S24-S29). Of note, brief expression of
Ngn3 is a feature of islet precursor cells in the embryonic pancreas
4. Together, these observations are
compatible with a model in which β-cell reconstitution after ablation in younglings
occurs following a sequence of events: δ-cells dedifferentiate, replicate once and then
half of the progeny activates Ngn3 expression before insulin production
(Fig. 2g). This was tested in a
combined double lineage-tracing experiment using Somatostatin-Cre;
R26-Tomato; Ngn3-YFP; RIP-DTR mice. Six weeks post-β-cell ablation,
insulin+ cells in younglings were Tomato+/YFP+ (Extended Data Fig.8k).
One key reprogramming and cell cycle entry player is FoxO1, a transcription factor
whose downregulation triggers Ngn3 expression in human fetal pancreatic
explants 5 and favors insulin production in
Ngn3+ entero-endocrine progenitors 6. FoxO1, usually in cooperation with TGFβ/SMAD signaling 7,8, inhibits
cell proliferation through the transcriptional regulation of cell cycle inhibitors and
activators 18, and is involved in cellular
senescence 7 (Extended Data Fig.9a). We then explored the FoxO1 molecular network in purified
adult or juvenile δ-cells before and after (1-week) β-cell ablation, using
Somatostatin-Cre; R26-YFP; RIP-DTR mice.
δ-cells displayed a divergent regulation of FoxO1 in injured
juvenile and adult mice. Consistent with FoxO1 downregulation in juvenile
δ-cells, PDK1 and AKT levels were increased,
cdkn1a/p21 and cdkn2b/p15Ink4b were downregulated, and
CKS1b, CDK2 and SKP were upregulated
(Fig. 3a), which is compatible with the proliferative
capacity of juvenile δ-cells after β-cell ablation. The opposite was found in
δ-cells of ablated adults (Fig. 3a; Extended Data Fig.9b).
Moreover, in δ-cells of younglings, but not in adults, there was a robust
upregulation of BMP1/4 downstream effectors (Fig. 3b)
9,10. Inversely, TGFβ pathway genes were upregulated in δ-cells of
regenerating adults (Fig. 3b), which is compatible with
the senescence scenario 7 involving
PI3K/FoxO1 and TGFβ/SMAD cooperation to maintain differentiation and cycle arrest
(Extended Data Fig9a,b).
In summary, PI3K/AKT and SKP2/SCF pathways potentially cooperate to downregulate
FoxO1 in δ-cells of regenerating younglings. Also, upregulation of
BMP effectors (ID1 and ID2) could contribute to
δ-cell dedifferentiation and proliferation, as observed in other systems 9,10 (Fig. 3c). Conversely, the PI3K/AKT pathway remained
downregulated in δ-cells of ablated adults, which would allow FoxO1 to impede
proliferation and dedifferentiation, probably through partnership with previously described
SMADs 11 (Extended Data Fig.9b).
We then checked whether a transient FoxO1 inhibition in adult mice would lead to a
juvenile-like δ-to-β cell conversion. Indeed, inactivation of FoxO1 in
β-cells causes their dedifferentiation 12. Here, Somatostatin-Cre; R26-YFP; RIP-DTR
β-cell-ablated adult mice were given a FoxO1 inhibitor (AS1842856) for 1 week, either
immediately following ablation (Fig. 3d) or 1 month later
(Extended Data Fig.10f; Supp. Tables S37-S39) 13,14. While FoxO1 inhibition in
non-ablated controls had minimal effect on insulin expression (Extended Data Fig.10a-d; Supp.
Tables S30-S32),
regeneration in diabetic mice was improved: insulin+ cells were more abundant
(11-fold; Fig. 3e,f; Supp. Table S33), and were reprogrammed
δ-cells (93% were YFP+, Fig. 3g; Supp. Table S34). One-fourth of the
YFP+ cells expressed insulin only (Fig. 3h;
Extended Data Fig.10e; Supp. Tables S35, S36), revealing that, like in younglings,
an important fraction of δ-cells had converted to insulin production.
These results support the involvement of a regenerative FoxO1 network and confirm
that δ-cell conversion can be pharmacologically induced in diabetic adults. FoxO1
blockade has a pleiotropic effect: inhibition of hepatic gluconeogenesis 13,14 and
promotion of δ-cell reprogramming (this study).
A century ago Morgan coined the terms epimorphosis and
morphallaxis to designate, respectively, regeneration involving either cell
dedifferentiation and proliferation or direct conversion from one cell type into another
without proliferation 15. Here we report in
mammals an age-dependent switch (“adult transition”) between epimorphic
regeneration during youth, and a less efficient yet persistent throughout life
proliferation-independent morphallactic mechanism.
Our findings uncover a novel role for δ-cells; perhaps
somatostatin+ cells in the stomach, intestine or hypothalamus share the same
capabilities. Intra-islet cell plasticity triggered by the disappearance of β-cells is
influenced by age: the proliferation decline in ageing cells 16 would explain the need of an “adult transition”.
Although less efficient, α-cell plasticity remains long-time after β-cell loss
since it is proliferation-independent.
These phenomena might be translatable to humans, for there is efficient
β-cell regeneration in children with T1D or after pancreatectomy 3,17-19, and glucagon/insulin bihormonal human cells
have been described upon epigenetic manipulation ex vivo20, and in diabetic patients 21,22.
Knowing also that only a small fraction of the α-cell population is sufficient to
maintain glucagon signaling 23,
understanding the nature of the diverse forms of intra-islet cell conversion might provide new
opportunities to fostering the formation of (α)β-like and
(δ)β-like cells.
We are grateful to Dominique Belin, Pierre Vassalli, Roland Stein, Alan Cookson, Ariel Ruiz
i Altaba, Marcos González Gaitán, Brigitte Galliot and Iván Rodríguez for comments, support and
discussions, and to G. Gallardo, O. Fazio, K. Hammad and B. Polat for the technical help. We
thank G. Gradwohl for the Ngn3-YFP mice. F.M.G. and F.R. were funded by
Wellcome Trust grants WT088357/Z/09/Z and WT084210/Z/07/Z, respectively. Work was funded
with grants from the NIH/NIDDK (“Beta Cell Biology Consortium”), JDRF
(Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation) and Swiss National Science Foundation
(“NRP63”) to P.L.H.
Footnotes
Author contributions. S.C. conceived and performed the experiments
and analyses, and wrote the manuscript. F.M.G. and F.R. generated the
Somatostatin-Cre line, and G.G. and J.N.J. the Ngn3-CreERT,
Ngn3-tTA and TRE-Ngn3 lines. D.B. characterized the pancreatic expression of
the Somatostatin-Cre line and performed the adult analysis. L.G.
performed experiments and analyses. V.C. profiled sorted fluorescent adult islet cells.
K.F., F.T. performed immunofluorescence microscopy. P.L.H. conceived the experiments and
wrote the manuscript.
References
1.Matveyenko AV, Butler PC. Relationship between beta-cell mass and diabetes onset. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2008;10(Suppl 4):23–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00939.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Atkinson MA. The pathogenesis and natural history of type 1 diabetes. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2012;2 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a007641. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a007641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Thorel F, et al. Conversion of adult pancreatic alpha-cells to beta-cells after extreme
beta-cell loss. Nature. 2010;464:1149–1154. doi: 10.1038/nature08894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Al-Masri M, et al. Effect of forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) on beta cell development in the human
fetal pancreas. Diabetologia. 2010;53:699–711. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1632-0. doi:10.1007/s00125-009-1632-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Talchai C, Xuan S, Kitamura T, DePinho RA, Accili D. Generation of functional insulin-producing cells in the gut by Foxo1
ablation. Nature genetics. 2012;44:406–412. S401. doi: 10.1038/ng.2215. doi:10.1038/ng.2215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Munoz-Espin D, et al. Programmed cell senescence during mammalian embryonic
development. Cell. 2013;155:1104–1118. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.019. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Seoane J, Le HV, Shen L, Anderson SA, Massague J. Integration of Smad and forkhead pathways in the control of neuroepithelial
and glioblastoma cell proliferation. Cell. 2004;117:211–223. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00298-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Yokota Y. Id and development. Oncogene. 2001;20:8290–8298. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205090. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Perk J, Iavarone A, Benezra R. Id family of helix-loop-helix proteins in cancer. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2005;5:603–614. doi: 10.1038/nrc1673. doi:10.1038/nrc1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.van der Vos KE, Coffer PJ. FOXO-binding partners: it takes two to tango. Oncogene. 2008;27:2289–2299. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.22. doi:10.1038/onc.2008.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Talchai C, Xuan S, Lin HV, Sussel L, Accili D. Pancreatic beta cell dedifferentiation as a mechanism of diabetic beta cell
failure. Cell. 2012;150:1223–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.029. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Nagashima T, et al. Discovery of novel forkhead box O1 inhibitors for treating type 2 diabetes:
improvement of fasting glycemia in diabetic db/db mice. Molecular pharmacology. 2010;78:961–970. doi: 10.1124/mol.110.065714. doi:10.1124/mol.110.065714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Tanaka H, et al. Effects of the novel Foxo1 inhibitor AS1708727 on plasma glucose and
triglyceride levels in diabetic db/db mice. European journal of pharmacology. 2010;645:185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.07.018. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Morgan TH. Regeneration and Liability to Injury. Science (New York, N.Y. 1901;14:235–248. doi: 10.1126/science.14.346.235. doi:14/346/235 [pii]10.1126/science.14.346.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Karges B, et al. Complete long-term recovery of beta-cell function in autoimmune type 1
diabetes after insulin treatment. Diabetes care. 2004;27:1207–1208. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Karges B, et al. Immunological mechanisms associated with long-term remission of human type
1 diabetes. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2006;22:184–189. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.600. doi:10.1002/dmrr.600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Desgraz R, Bonal C, Herrera PL. beta-cell regeneration: the pancreatic intrinsic faculty. Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM. 2011;22:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2010.09.004. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Bramswig NC, et al. Epigenomic plasticity enables human pancreatic alpha to beta cell
reprogramming. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123:1275–1284. doi: 10.1172/JCI66514. doi:10.1172/JCI66514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Butler AE, et al. Marked Expansion of Exocrine and Endocrine Pancreas with Incretin Therapy
in Humans with increased Exocrine Pancreas Dysplasia and the potential for
Glucagon-producing Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diabetes. 2013 doi: 10.2337/db12-1686. doi:10.2337/db12-1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Yoneda S, et al. Predominance of beta-cell neogenesis rather than replication in humans with
an impaired glucose tolerance and newly diagnosed diabetes. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2013;98:2053–2061. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3832. doi:10.1210/jc.2012-3832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Thorel F, et al. Normal glucagon signaling and beta-cell function after near-total
alpha-cell ablation in adult mice. Diabetes. 2011;60:2872–2882. doi: 10.2337/db11-0876. doi:10.2337/db11-0876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.