Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 2014 Nov;144(5):487. doi: 10.1085/jgp.20111068510152014c

Low aqueous solubility of 11-cis-retinal limits the rate of pigment formation and dark adaptation in salamander rods

Rikard Frederiksen, Nicholas P Boyer, Benjamin Nickle, Kalyan S Chakrabarti, Yiannis Koutalos, Rosalie K Crouch, Daniel Oprian, M Carter Cornwall
PMCID: PMC4210429

Volume 139, No. 6, June 4, 2012. Pages 493–505.

The values for ψ on page 504 should be roughly 1,000-fold higher than reported. The correct calculation is as follows:

ψ = D 2 π r l C pm/d, where

D = 5 × 10−6 cm2 s−1 = 5 × 10−10 m2 s−1

r = 5.7 µm = 5.7 × 10−6 m

l = 29.8 µm = 29.8 × 10−6 m

d = 50 nm = 50 × 10−9 m

C pm for 11-cis retinal = 3.5 µM = 3.5 × 10−3 mol m−3

C pm for 11-cis 4-OH retinal = 10 µM = 10 × 10−3 mol m−3

This gives ψ11-cis = 3.7 × 10−14 mol s−1, and ψ4-OH = 1.1 × 10−13 mol s−1, which is roughly 1,000-fold greater than originally reported. Thus, the values of ψ are roughly 2,700 times greater than the experimentally measured K for 11-cis retinal (K 11-cis = 1.4 × 10−17 mol s−1) and 1,600 times greater than K for 11-cis 4-OH retinal (K 4-OH = 6.8 × 10−17 mol s−1). This indicates that the simple model presented on page 503 for diffusional translocation of 11-cis retinal is not sufficient to explain the slowness of the rate of regeneration that the authors observed.

The authors would like to thank Professor Trevor Lamb for bringing this error to their attention.


Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES