Skip to main content
Gastroenterology Research and Practice logoLink to Gastroenterology Research and Practice
. 2014 Oct 13;2014:943175. doi: 10.1155/2014/943175

S100A8 and S100A9 Positive Cells in Colorectal Carcinoma: Clinicopathological Analysis

Cumhur İbrahim Başsorgun 1, Betül Ünal 1,*, Nuray Erin 2, Anıl Özlük 2, Özlem Ceren Uzun 1, Gülsüm Özlem Elpek 1
PMCID: PMC4211213  PMID: 25371673

Abstract

Introduction. In colorectal carcinoma, tumoral tissues infiltrate with various immune/inflammatory cells along their invasive margins and the increased S100A8/A9 expression in these immune cells infiltrating the tumor has recently been demonstrated. We examined S100A8/A9 as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma. Materials and Methods. The current study included a sample of 80 patients diagnosed with CRC (30 cases with distant metastasis, 30 cases with lymph node metastasis, and 20 cases with no metastasis). Peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8 and S100A9 expressing inflammatory cells were counted in primary tumors and their metastasis and correlated with clinicopathological parameters. Results. The peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells showed no correlation with age, gender, or depth of tumor invasion. However higher counts of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells were associated with larger tumor size, higher grade, and the presence of metastasis (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Our study also found significantly higher number of S100A8/A9 positive cells in the tumor microenvironment among patients with large tumor size, high grade, and metastatic disease. Moreover, in our study, we observed that the expression in the tumor metastasis appeared similar to that of primary tumor.

1. Introduction

S100A8 (calgranulin A or migration inhibitory factor-related protein-8 (MRP-8)) and its binding partner S100A9 (calgranulin B or MRP-14) are two members of a multigenic family of cytoplasmic Ca2+-binding proteins [1]. These proteins are synthesized by the myeloid cell group mainly composed of neutrophils, monocytes, immature myeloid cells, and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [2, 3]. Both proteins are often coexpressed, composing the heterodimeric complex of S100A8/A9 usually known as “calprotectin” [2]. Increased S100A8/A9 expression has been reported to occur in several chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, cystic fibrosis, tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and transplant rejection [46]. In addition to inflammatory conditions, overexpression of S100A8/A9 has also been observed in various types of cancer including stomach, prostate, breast, skin, pancreas, liver, lung, bladder, colon, and esophageal cancers [711].

In colorectal carcinoma, tumoral tissues infiltrate with various immune/inflammatory cells along their invasive margins, and the increased S100A8/A9 expression in these immune cells infiltrating the tumor has recently been demonstrated by certain studies. In addition, several studies have suggested that increased S100A8/A9 expression in colorectal carcinoma may play a role in tumor progression and may be associated with metastasis and histological grade. Although a few studies imply a possible relationship with tumor progression and metastasis, there is no clear correlation between increased expression of S100A8/A9 in colorectal cancer and clinicopathological parameters such as tumor progression, tumor stage, lymph node metastases, or distant metastases. The studies conducted on this topic so far have used different counting methods in assessing the S100A8/A9 expression. Research on the subject has been mostly restricted to limited comparisons of peritumoral inflammatory cells in primary tumors or intratumoral inflammatory cells and tumor cells. However, no research has been found to examine the expression in tumor metastasis and severity or its comparison with the primary tumors.

In our study, we investigated increased expression of S100A8/A9 in the tumor microenvironment in colorectal carcinoma as well as previously shown inflammatory process functions of S100A8/A9, which exhibits concentration-dependent function and forms a heterodimeric complex. We also examined S100A8/A9 as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma by analyzing the relationship between S100A8/A9, secreted by immune cells infiltrating the tumor along its invasive margin, and various clinicopathological parameters including tumor progression and metastasis.

2. Materials and Methods

The current study included a sample of 80 patients diagnosed with CRC (30 cases with distant metastasis, 30 cases with lymph node metastasis, and 20 cases with no metastasis) in the Department of Pathology, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty. The patients were surgically treated at the Department of Surgery between 2007 and 2012. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1.

Distributions of mean ± SD and median values of S100A8/A9 positive cells in both intratumoral and peritumoral areas, *P < 0.05.

Parameters S100A8 (intratumoral) S100A8 (peritumoral) S100A9 (intratumoral) S100A8 (peritumoral)
Mean ± SD Median Mean ± SD Median Mean ± SD Median Mean ± SD Median
Age (years)
 <64 138.06 ± 82.3 83 213.04 ± 97.21 166 161.68 ± 92.04 135 338.73 ± 144.2 270
 >64 140.96 ± 73.5 96 227.98 ± 112.4 191 173.78 ± 90.2 154 323.87 ± 127.79 250
Gender
 Female 149.66 ± 87.2 88 222.81 ± 112.4 157 158.74 ± 69.32 136 325.63 ± 172.5 230
 Male 129.28 ± 59.2 97 218.21 ± 89.12 176 176.72 ± 81.54 170 336.97 ± 148.11 269
Size (cm)∗
 <5.7 105.9 ± 52.3 74 154.77 ± 67.31 149 118.82 ± 57.91 110 285.46 ± 133.6 262
 >5.7 173.56 ± 76.02 130 286.25 ± 133.14 181 216.64 ± 109.53 157 377.14 ± 144.51 315
Grade∗
 Low 108.75 ± 42.5 62 168.53 ± 67.71 132 130.79 ± 63.42 119 295.14 ± 121.33 203
 High 170.71 ± 78.01 136 272.49 ± 114.99 143 204.67 ± 75.33 186 367.46 ± 136.89 332
Depth of invasion
 T1 137.85 ± 46.59 72 220.51 ± 67.86 132 162.3 ± 59.32 119 329.18 ± 112.23 212
 T2 132.98 ± 58.98 107 203.95 ± 102.53 183 167.73 ± 68.15 129 325.12 ± 107.54 284
 T3 149.36 ± 73.76 124 223.86 ± 106.12 271 169.2 ± 47.32 190 333.25 ± 101.04 252
 T4 138.73 ± 75.63 123 233.72 ± 98.21 198. 171.69 ± 76.02 147 337.65 ± 144.51 217
Lymph nodes∗
 N0 110.98 ± 46.34 62 171.85 ± 87.86 132 104.51 ± 95.91 68 273.45 ± 128.43 201
 N1 129.16 ± 54.97 107 208.32 ± 102.53 183 169.04 ± 68.5 129 305.68 ± 103.54 264
 N2 179.05 ± 43.76 114 281.86 ± 106.2 212 229.64 ± 98.89 108. 414.77 ± 101.04 371
Distant metastasis∗
 Absent 114.51 ± 28.2 45 182,27 ± 3.12 82 140.21 ± 47.21 69 182.3 ± 77.31 146
 Present 164.95 ± 73.5 122 258.75 ± 123.1 181 195.25 ± 94.24 173 480.3 ± 144.51 320

Table 2.

Distribution of clinicopathologic parameters according to median values S100A8/A9 positive cells in both intratumoral and peritumoral areas. (Chi-square test, *P < 0.05.)

Parameters S100 A8 (intratumoral) S100 A8 (peritumoral) S100 A9 (intratumoral) S100 A9 (peritumoral)
<123 (%) >123 (%) P* <198 (%) >198 (%) P <147 (%) >147 (%) P <297 (%) >297 (%) P
Age (years)
 <64 19 (55.9) 15 (44.1) 0.16 20 (58.8) 14 (41.2) 0.12 19 (55.9) 15 (44.1) 0.27 20 (58.8) 14 (41.2) 0.12
 >64 20 (43.5) 26 (56.5) 19 (41.3) 27 (58.7) 20 (43.5) 20 (43.5) 19 (41.3) 27 (58.7)
Gender
 Female 17 (41.5) 24 (58.5) 0.54 15 (36.6) 26 (63.4) 0.32 16 (39) 25 (61) 0.07 16 (39) 25 (61) 0.08
 Male 22 (56.4) 17 (43.6) 24 (61.5) 15 (38.5) 23 (59) 16 (41) 23 (59) 16 (41)
Size (cm)∗
 <5.7 28 (63.6) 16 (36.4) 0.003 29 (65.9) 15 (34.1) 0.001 29 (65.9) 15 (34.1) 0.001 31 (70.5) 13 (29.5) 0.001
 >5.7 11 (30.6) 25 (69.4) 10 (27.8) 26 (72.2) 10 (27.8) 26 (72.2) 8 (22.2 ) 28 (77.8)
Grade∗
 Low 24 (68.6) 11 (31.4) 0.003 26 (74.3) 9 (25.7) 0.001 25 (71.4) 10 (28.6) 0.001 27 (77.1) 8 (22.9) 0.001
 High 15 (33.3) 30 (66.7) 13 ( 28.9) 32 (71.1) 14 (31.1) 31 (68.9) 12 (28.9) 33 (73.3)
Depth of invasion
 T1 17 (65.4) 9 (34.6) 0.8 16 (61.5) 10 (38.5) 0.23 17 (65.4) 9 (34.6) 0.8 14 (53.8) 12 (46.2) 0.65
 T2 11 (55) 9 (45) 10 (50) 10 (50) 11 (55) 9 (45) 10 (50) 10 (50)
 T3 6 (35.3) 11 (64.7) 8 (47.1) 9 (52.9) 6 (35.3) 11 (64.7) 9 (52.9) 8 (47.1)
 T4 5 (29.4) 12 (70.6) 5 (29.4) 12 (70.6) 5 (29.4) 12 (70.6) 6 (35.3) 11 (64.7)
Lymph nodes∗
 N0 20 (60.6) 13 (39.4) 0.001 20 (60.6) 13 (39.4) 0.01 20 (60.6) 13 (39.4) 0.003 19 (54.5) 14 (45.5) 0.01
 N1 16 (64) 9 (36) 14 (56) 11 (44) 15 (60) 10 (40) 14 (56) 11 (44)
 N2 3 (13.6) 19 (86.4) 5 (22.7) 17 (77.3) 4 (18.2) 18 (81.8) 7 (31.8) 15 (68.2)
Distant metastasis∗
 Absent 16 (80) 4 (20) 0.001 12 (80) 8 (40) 0.001 15 (75) 5 (25) 0.007 14 (70) 6 (30) 0.007
 Present 23 (38.3) 37 (61.7) 23 (38.3) 37 (61.7) 24 (40) 36 (60) 24 (40) 36 (60)

The median age of the 39 men was 69.6 years (range: 49–78 years) at the time of operation and that of the 41 women was 60.4 years (range: 41–84 years).

Four-micrometer-thick haematoxylin and eosin stained tissue sections from the surgical specimens fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin were reviewed and representative tissue blocks were selected. Slides were immunostained with anti-S100A8 and anti-S100A9 (1 : 50 dilution, Santa Cruz, USA) monoclonal antibodies by the avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase technique. Peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8 and S100A9 expressing inflammatory cells were counted in primary tumors and their metastasis. In each case, positive cells were counted at ×400 magnification in 10 systematically selected fields of vision and their mean number was obtained by averaging the number of positive cells per square millimeter of tissue. The research data were analyzed using SPSS 10.0. Continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test, and Chi-square test was used for univariate analysis of categorical data. Tests were considered significant when their P values were <0.05.

3. Results

Tumors generally contained higher number of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A9 positive cells than peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8 positive cells (Figures 1 and 2). The mean number of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells was significantly higher in tumors with larger size, higher grade, and metastasis (P < 0.05) (Table 1). When patients were categorized as having median S100A8/A9 cell counts, for further statistical evaluation, the peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells showed no correlation with age, gender, or depth of tumor invasion (Table 2). However higher counts of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells were associated with larger tumor size, higher grade, and the presence of metastasis (P < 0.05).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

S100A8 staining in intratumoral (a) and peritumoral (b) inflammatory cells (×200).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

S100A9 staining in intratumoral (a) and peritumoral (b) inflammatory cells (×200).

4. Discussion

Increased expression of S100A8/A9 in colorectal carcinoma was first shown by Stulík et al. using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis [12]. S100A8/A9 has both intracellular and extracellular functions. In the intracellular space, S100A8/A9 detects calcium, activates NADPH oxidase, and conducts arachidonic acid transport into cells [13, 14], while in the extracellular space it exhibits concentration-dependent functions. At high concentrations (>80 microgram/mL), it displays apoptotic effect on tumor cells, whereas at lower concentrations (<25 microgram/mL) it regulates the viability and migration of tumor cells, endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells and supports tumor cell growth [1517]. MDSC plays an important part in the suppression of T cell-mediated immune response, increasing in number in inflammation and tumors. As a result of interaction with S100A8/A9 binding sites on MDSC, S100A8/A9 activates MDSC migration [18]. In other words, S100A8/A9 provides MDSC accumulation through an autocrine feedback effect. S100A8/A9 performs these effects through certain cell surface receptors. These are TLR4 and RAGE receptors, known to play a role in infection, autoimmunity, and cancer [19].

Wnt/beta-catenin pathway has a crucial role in the development of colorectal carcinoma [20].

In fact, Duan et al. demonstrated that S100A8/A9 contributed survival and migration of colorectal carcinoma cells through Wnt/beta-catenin pathway, emphasizing that it might be a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma [19].

Our study found that S100A8/A9 positive cell count observed in the tumor microenvironment (peritumoral, intratumoral) was significantly high in the study sample of 80 patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma (30 patients with distant metastases, 30 patients with lymph node metastasis, and 20 cases with no metastasis), and comparison with clinicopathological parameters revealed that increased number of S100A8/A9 positive cells was associated with tumor size, high grade, and metastasis. On the other hand, it was found that the number of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells had no correlation with age, gender, and tumor invasion depth. Besides, comparison of positive cell count in the metastatic tumor tissue with positive cell count in the primary tumor did not show a statistically significant difference. This also accords with earlier observations by Duan et al., who found that S100A8/A9 expression in tumor microenvironment of colorectal carcinoma was associated with tumor cell differentiation, Dukes stage, and metastasis [19]. In addition, this study emphasized that this impact of proteins on tumor progression contributed to survival and migration of tumor cells through Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. In fact, some research has reported that Wnt/beta-catenin pathway plays a critical role in the development of colorectal carcinoma [20]. Another study by Ang et al. [21] associated S100A8/A9 expression in stromal cells of colorectal carcinoma with large tumor size. Our findings seem to be consistent with the results of these previous studies investigating the relationship between the expression and clinicopathological parameters. Also, Kim et al., who conducted a study on S100A8/A9, observed increased expression of both proteins in stromal cells in colorectal carcinomas [22] and Sheikh et al. in pancreatic cancer-associated monocytes [23].

There are also several studies that associated the increased expression of S100A8/A9 with poor differentiation in tumors of breast, thyroid, and lung which exhibit glandular differentiation [10, 24, 25]. These members of the S-100 protein family can be identified as potential therapeutic targets for intervention in cancer treatment. However, far too little attention has been paid to the correlation between the expressions of these proteins in the tumor microenvironment in colorectal carcinoma and clinicopathological parameters used to predict tumor progression.

In conclusion, it has been suggested that calcium ions play a significant role in the development of colorectal carcinoma through a direct impact on proliferation and differentiation via calcium receptors [26]. For this reason, increased expression of calcium-binding proteins S100A8 and A9, members of the S-100 protein family, in the peritumoral and intratumoral spaces in colorectal carcinoma becomes important for tumor progression.

Therefore, the analyses conducted on the expression of these proteins and tumor behavior suggest that S100A8/A9 can become potential therapeutic targets in cancer treatment. So far, a limited number of studies have reported correlation between increased expression of S100A8/A9 and parameters such as tumor differentiation, metastasis, tumor size, and Dukes stage. Consistent with this finding, our study also found significantly higher number of S100A8/A9 positive cells in the tumor microenvironment among patients with large tumor size, high grade, and metastatic disease. Moreover, in our study, we observed that the expression in the tumor metastasis appeared similar to that of primary tumor. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to substantiate the results of this study and to better understand the functions of the S100A8/A9 positive immune cells observed in the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer in tumorigenesis and tumor progression.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Lukanidin E, Sleeman JP. Building the niche: the role of the S100 proteins in metastatic growth. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2012;22(3):216–225. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Murthy AR, Lehrer RI, Harwig SS, Miyasaki KT. In vitro candidastatic properties of the human neutrophil calprotectin complex. Journal of Immunology. 1993;151(11):6291–6301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yui S, Mikami M, Yamazaki M. Purification and characterization of the cytotoxic factor in rat peritoneal exudate cells: its identification as the calcium binding protein complex, calprotectin. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 1995;58(3):307–316. doi: 10.1002/jlb.58.3.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nacken W, Roth J, Sorg C, Kerkhoff C. S100A9/S100A8: myeloid representatives of the S100 protein family as prominent players in innate immunity. Microscopy research and technique. 2003;60(6):569–580. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Odink K, Cerletti N, Bruggen J, et al. Two calcium-binding proteins in infiltrate macrophages of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 1987;330(6143):80–82. doi: 10.1038/330080a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Roth J, Goebeler M, Sorg C. S100A8 and S100A9 in inflammatory diseases. The Lancet. 2001;357(9261, article 1041) doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71610-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.El-Rifai W, Moskaluk CA, Abdrabbo MK, et al. Gastric cancers overexpress S100A calcium-binding proteins. Cancer Research. 2002;62(23):6823–6826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Minami S, Sato Y, Matsumoto T, et al. Proteomic study of sera from patients with bladder cancer: usefulness of S100A8 and S100A9 proteins. Cancer Genomics and Proteomics. 2010;7(4):181–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cross SS, Hamdy FC, Deloulme JC, Rehman I. Expression of S100 proteins in normal human tissues and common cancers using tissue microarrays: S100A6, S100A8, S100A9 and S100A11 are all overexpressed in common cancers. Histopathology. 2005;46(3):256–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arai K, Teratani T, Nozawa R, Yamada T. Immunohistochemical investigation of S100A9 expression in pulmonary adenocarcinoma: S100A9 expression is associated with tumor differentiation. Oncology Reports. 2001;8(3):591–596. doi: 10.3892/or.8.3.591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arai K, Yamada T, Nozawa R. Immunohistochemical investigation of migration inhibitory factor-related protein (MRP)-14 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Medical Oncology. 2000;17(3):183–188. doi: 10.1007/BF02780526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stulík J, Osterreicher J, Koupilová K. The analysis of S100A9 and S100A8 expression in matched sets of macroscopically normal colon mucosa and colorectal carcinoma: the S100A9 and S100A8 positive cells underlie and invade tumor mass. Electrophoresis. 1999;20(4-5):1047–1054. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:4/5<1047::AID-ELPS1047>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Donato R. Intracellular and extracellular roles of S100 proteins. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2003;60(6):540–551. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kerkhoff C, Nacken W, Benedyk M, Dagher MC, Sopalla C, Doussiere J. The arachidonic acid-binding protein S100A8/A9 promotes NADPH oxidase activation by interaction with p67phox and Rac-2. The FASEB Journal. 2005;19(3):467–469. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2377fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ghavami S, Rashedi I, Dattilo BM, et al. S100A8/A9 at low concentration promotes tumor cell growth via RAGE ligation and MAP kinase-dependent pathway. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2008;83(6):1484–1492. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0607397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nakatani Y, Yamazaki M, Chazin WJ, Yui S. Regulation of S100A8/A9 (calprotectin) binding to tumor cells by zinc ion and its implication for apoptosis-inducing activity. Mediators of Inflammation. 2005;2005(5):280–292. doi: 10.1155/MI.2005.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yui S, Nakatani Y, Hunter MJ, Chazin WJ, Yamazaki M. Implication of extracellular zinc exclusion by recombinant human calprotectin (MRP8 and MRP14) from target cells in its apoptosis-inducing activity. Mediators of Inflammation. 2002;11(3):165–172. doi: 10.1080/09622935020138208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sinha P, Okoro C, Foell D, Freeze HH, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Srikrishna G. Proinflammatory S100 proteins regulate the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Journal of Immunology. 2008;181(7):4666–4675. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Duan L, Wu R, Ye L, et al. S100A8 and S100A9 are associated with colorectal carcinoma progression and contribute to colorectal carcinoma cell survival and migration via Wnt/β-catenin pathway. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062092.e62092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fodde R, Brabletz T. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cancer stemness and malignant behavior. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2007;19(2):150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ang CW, Nedjadi T, Sheikh AA, et al. Smad4 loss is associated with fewer S100A8-positive monocytes in colorectal tumors and attenuated response to S100A8 in colorectal and pancreatic cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(9):1541–1551. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim JH, OH S-H, Kim E-J, et al. The role of myofibroblasts in upregulation of S100A8 and S100A9 and the differentiation of myeloid cells in the colorectal cancer microenvironment. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2012;423(1):60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sheikh AA, Vimalachandran D, Thompson CC, et al. The expression of S100A8 in pancreatic cancer-associated monocytes is associated with the Smad4 status of pancreatic cancer cells. Proteomics. 2007;7(11):1929–1940. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Arai K, Takano S, Teratani T, Ito Y, Yamada T, Nozawa R. S100A8 and S100A9 overexpression is associated with poor pathological parameters in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Current Cancer Drug Targets. 2008;8(4):243–252. doi: 10.2174/156800908784533445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ito Y, Arai K, Nozawa R, et al. S100A8 and S100A9 expression is a crucial factor for dedifferentiation in thyroid carcinoma. Anticancer Research. 2009;29(10):4157–4161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Whitfield JF, Bird RP, Chakravarthy BR, Isaacs RJ, Morley P. Calcium-cell cycle regulator, differentiator, killer, chemopreventor, and maybe, tumor promoter. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 1995;58(22):74–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gastroenterology Research and Practice are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES