Abstract
Post-hatch fishes lack a functional gill and use cutaneous surfaces for exchange with the surrounding environment. The ionoregulatory hypothesis posits that ionoregulation is the first physiological process to be limited by cutaneous exchange, necessitating its shift to the gills. We hypothesized that the ontogeny of branchial ammonia excretion (Jamm) is coupled to Na+ uptake (
) in accordance with the current model for
exchange in freshwater. Using divided chambers, branchial and cutaneous Jamm,
and oxygen consumption (MO2) by larval rainbow trout were assessed. Following hatch, the skin accounted for 97% and 86% of total Jamm and
, respectively. Jamm and
shifted to the gills simultaneously at 15 days post-hatch (dph) and were highly correlated (R2 = 0.951) at the gills, but not the skin, over development. Contrastingly, MO2 shifted significantly later at 27 dph, in agreement with the ionoregulatory hypothesis. Moreover, the mRNA expression and/or enzymatic activity of Rhesus proteins, Na+/H+-exchanger, H+-ATPase, Na+/K+-ATPase and carbonic anhydrase, all key components of the
-exchange system, increased in the gills over larval development. We propose that the ontogeny of branchial
occurs as
exchange and provide evidence for a novel element to the ionoregulatory hypothesis, the excretion of potentially lethal metabolic ammonia.
Keywords: ammonia excretion, sodium uptake, oxygen consumption, gill development, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) larvae, ionoregulatory hypothesis
1. Introduction
The gill in most teleost fishes is the major site for physiological exchanges with the surrounding environment, participating in gas exchange, ion acquisition, acid-base regulation and nitrogenous waste excretion (reviewed in [1]). In larval fishes, however, the gill is undeveloped following hatch and contributes little to physiological exchange (e.g. [2,3]). Initially, the skin is the dominant site, and as the gills develop, these exchanges eventually shift to become primarily branchial [2,3]. The selective pressures underlying gill ontogeny in both a developmental and evolutionary context have been debated over several decades.
In larval fishes, metabolic rate increases more rapidly over development than skin surface area, leading to a problematic limitation in cutaneous transport, necessitating the development of the gills (reviewed in [4]). August Krogh [5] first suggested that the earliest function of the developing gill is O2 uptake and this hypothesis, termed the oxygen hypothesis, was the accepted view of gill development for half a century. More recently, however, this view has been challenged. In many fish species, the appearance of branchial ionocytes, the primary site of ionoregulatory exchange, precedes the formation of gill respiratory structures (i.e. filaments or lamellae) [6–8]. These observations led to the ionoregulatory hypothesis, which posits that ionoregulation is the earliest gill function (reviewed in [4,9]). Most recently, Fu et al. [3], using divided chambers, directly demonstrated that in rainbow trout larvae reared in soft or hard water, Na+ uptake shifts from the skin to the gills prior to O2 uptake, strongly supporting the ionoregulatory hypothesis.
The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between the ontogeny of Na+ uptake and the ontogeny of excretion of ammonia, the third respiratory gas [10], at this early life stage in an ammoniotelic teleost fish. As recently suggested [9], the ontogeny of branchial ion uptake may occur as a function of homeostatic processes which are coupled to ion uptake such as acid-base balance and/or ammonia excretion, rather than being solely for the acquisition of mineral nutrients. We hypothesized that branchial ammonia excretion in larval trout would occur as a function of
exchange and that this coupling of Na+ uptake (
) and ammonia excretion (Jamm) might represent the earliest function of the developing gill. Moreover, Jamm in larval fishes is particularly important given that the catabolism of yolk sac proteins, which fuels metabolism at this stage, generates a metabolic ammonia load [11] which can be potentially lethal at elevated levels [12].
In adult rainbow trout, Jamm is believed to be coupled to
via an
-exchange complex in which Rhesus (Rh) glycoproteins play a critical role (reviewed in [13]). However, it is not clear if this would be the case in larval trout where
shifts from the skin to the gills over development [3]. We used the same divided chamber approach as employed by Fu et al. [3] to examine these processes. We predicted that, similar to
and oxygen consumption (MO2) [2,3], Jamm would initially occur via cutaneous routes, but would shift to the gills in synchrony with
and not with MO2. Such a result would indicate that the ontogeny of branchial Na+ uptake occurs as part of
-coupled exchange, adding a critical new element to the ionoregulatory hypothesis. Alternatively, if Jamm at this stage is not coupled to
, we might expect its shift to be closer to that of another respiratory gas, oxygen. An additional related hypothesis was that Jamm and
in larval trout would occur via the components of the
-exchange complex. We predicted that the increase in branchial Jamm and
over development would occur in conjunction with an increase in gene expression and/or enzymatic activity of the key components of the complex (Rh proteins, Na+/H+-exchanger (NHE), Na+/K+-ATPase, H+-ATPase and carbonic anhydrase (CA; reviewed in [13]) in the gills, while a decreased mRNA expression and/or activity of these proteins was expected in skin tissues.
2. Material and methods
(a). Fish husbandry
Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) embryos were purchased in the eyed-up stage from Rainbow Springs Hatchery (Thamesford, Ontario, Canada) and held at 12°C in hatching trays with flow-through Hamilton dechlorinated tapwater (moderately hard: [Na+] = 0.6 mequiv l−1, [Cl−] = 0.8 mequiv l−1, [Ca2+] = 0.8 equiv l−1, [Mg2+] = 0.3 mequiv l−1, [K+] = 0.05 mequiv l−1; titration alkalinity 2.1 mequiv l−1; pH approx. 8.0; hardness approx. 140 mg l−1 as CaCO3 equivalents). All larvae used in flux experiments and measurements of whole-body ammonia content were from the same batch of embryos which hatched at the same time. Hatching took place approximately one week after purchase and this marked the beginning of the experimental period. Complete yolk sac absorption (CYA) occurred approximately 30 days post-hatch (dph) at which point exogenous feeding began, with daily meals of approximately 5% fish body mass. All experiments performed after CYA were conducted on 48 h fasted fish; experimental temperature was 12°C.
(b). Experimental design for flux measurements
At 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 dph, and following CYA, experiments were conducted to estimate branchial and cutaneous contributions to ammonia excretion (Jamm), Na+ uptake (
) and oxygen consumption (MO2) using a divided chamber protocol. Prior to experimentation, fish were anaesthetized in 50–100 ppm clove oil, similar to that used in a previous divided chamber study [3]. After anaesthesia to stage 3 [14], each fish was loaded into a small hole in a latex dental dam, such that its head, operculae and pectoral fins were separated spatially from the rest of its body. The fish and dam were then mounted between two 5-ml half-chambers containing dechlorinated tapwater with 10–15 ppm clove oil. Fresh aerated, clove oil-spiked tapwater was then circulated through both chambers using a peristaltic pump at a rate of 0.2 ml min−1 for a 1 h acclimation period. An additional control series of experiments was conducted on non-anaesthetized, unrestrained larvae at 3 dph, which revealed that the anaesthetic and divided chamber set-up had no significant effect on Jamm,
or MO2 (data not shown). All experimental procedures, measurements and analyses used for control experiments were identical to those used in the divided chamber experiments described below.
(c). Jamm and
Following the 1 h acclimation period, water recirculation was stopped and 0.5 µCi 22Na (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) was added to either the anterior or posterior chamber; it was not possible to measure anterior and posterior Na+ fluxes on the same fish. Following 5 min of mixing by aeration, initial 1.25 ml samples were taken from both chambers to measure water total ammonia (Tamm), Na radioactivity (as counts per minute; cpm) and total [Na+]. Following a 1.5 h flux period, identical final samples were taken, and the remaining water volume was measured in both chambers. Larvae were removed from the divided chambers and were rinsed three times with 5 mM NaCl and once with double-distilled water to remove any surface-bound isotope. Larvae were then euthanized using 0.2 g l−1 MS-222, weighed, and counted for 22Na radioactivity. Samples for water Tamm were stored at −20°C until later analysis while samples for 22Na radioactivity were counted immediately and stored at 4°C until later [Na+] analysis. For each flux, a maximum of 10% isotope leak to the unloaded chamber was accepted as a successful dam and all fish recovered completely from anaesthetic treatment within 5 min, prior to euthanasia.
All flux values are presented as flux per gram of whole fish including the yolk sac. Total ammonia concentrations (Tamm) of water samples were assayed using the protocol described by Verdouw et al. [15]. Anterior and posterior ammonia flux rates (Jamm; µmol g–1 h–1) were determined using the following equation:
| 2.1 |
where Tammf and Tammi are the final and initial concentrations of ammonia (µmol l–1) in the water samples within the anterior or posterior chambers, V is volume (l) of the given chamber, t is flux duration (h) and M is mass (g) of the fish, yolk sac included. Total Jamm was determined by adding anterior and posterior flux rates from the same fish. Radioactivity of 22Na in counts per minute (cpm) of water samples and whole larvae was measured via gamma counting (Perkin Elmer Wizard 1480 3″ Auto Gamma Counter), and [Na+] of water samples was measured using atomic absorption spectrophotometry (SpectrAA 220FS Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer). Anterior and posterior sodium influx rates (
; μmol g–1 h–1) were calculated as
| 2.2 |
where Rfish is the gamma-radiaoactivity of the fish (cpm) at the end of the flux period and SAaverage is the mean of the initial and final specific activities (cpm/μmol) of the water from the 22Na-loaded chamber. Total
(anterior + posterior) was calculated by sorting replicate fish by mass and pairing corresponding anterior and posterior replicates together.
(d). MO2
O2 consumption rates were measured on separate fish at the same time periods. Following the 1 h acclimation period described above, air lines were removed and anterior and posterior chambers were filled completely with clove oil-spiked tapwater. Initial 600-μl samples were taken from both chambers and replaced with an equal volume of water of known PO2. The PO2 of each initial sample was read immediately using a Clarke-type oxygen electrode (Cameron Instruments) connected to a Model 1900 Polarographic Amplifier (AM Systems) kept at 12°C. Following 0.5–1 h, a second 600 μl sample was taken from each chamber to assess final PO2. This procedure was done simultaneously for both anterior and posterior chambers for each replicate fish. Larvae were then removed from the divided chambers, euthanized and weighed. As in the previous series, 0.5 µCi 22Na was added to one side for the assessment of dam integrity. Anterior and posterior oxygen consumption rates (MO2; μmol g–1 h–1) were calculated as
| 2.3 |
where PO2i (mmHg) is the initial PO2 of the chamber which was corrected for the replacement water of a known PO2 (see above), PO2f (mmHg) is the final PO2 of the chamber and αO2 (μmol l–1 mmHg–1) is the solubility constant for O2 in water at 12°C [16].
(e). Skin surface area measurements and calculation of branchial and cutaneous flux rates
In a separate batch of larvae, lateral images of larvae at each developmental time point (n = 3–6) were taken using a digital camera attached to a Leica EZ4D dissecting microscope. Images were then traced using ImageJ software (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, USA) and the two-dimensional anterior (head, operculum, pectoral fin) and posterior (body, yolk sac, and dorsal and pelvic fins) surface area (SA) of the lateral aspect of the fish was determined. The resulting proportions of posterior SA relative to total SA over development (% posterior; electronic supplementary material, table S1) were similar to those reported previously using a different method [3]. Branchial flux rates (µmol g–1 h–1) were then determined as
![]() |
2.4 |
where anterior flux rate (µmol g–1 h–1) is the flux measured in the anterior chamber, anterior SA (cm2) is average anterior cutaneous surface area, average posterior flux rate (µmol g–1 h–1) is the average flux measured in the posterior chamber and posterior SA (cm2) is the average posterior cutaneous surface area. Cutaneous flux rates (µmol g–1 h–1) were calculated as
| 2.5 |
where total flux rate (µmol g–1 h–1) is the sum of anterior and posterior flux rates. As in [3], these calculations assume that cutaneous flux per unit skin area is the same in the head region (i.e. anterior chamber) as in the rest of the body (i.e. posterior chamber).
(f). Estimation of cutaneous-to-branchial shifting point
In order to estimate the cutaneous-to-branchial shifting point for a given process (where 50% occurs via branchial or cutaneous routes), per cent of total branchial and cutaneous values were plotted as x-values against time (dph; y-values). x = 0 was then set to 50%, such that the y-intercept (in dph) occurred at x = 50% and would correspond to the shifting point for any given process. y-intercept values and corresponding standard errors of estimate were obtained using SigmaPlot v. 10.0 (Systat Software, Inc.).
(g). Whole-body tissue Tamm and turnover time
At 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 dph, and following CYA, a random set of larvae were removed from hatching trays, euthanized in neutralized 0.1 g l−1 MS-222, and immediately flash frozen and stored at −80°C. Larvae (1–4 per replicate) were then ground into a fine powder using a liquid N2-cooled mortar and pestle. The powder was deproteinized with 8% HClO3 and subsequently neutralized using 2 M KOH. Whole-body Tamm was measured in neutralized, deproteinized samples using a commercial kit (Cliniqa Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA) described in previous studies (e.g. [17]). Ammonia turnover time was calculated as
| 2.6 |
(h). Branchial and cutaneous enzyme activity and gene expression
At 3, 12, 21 dph, and following CYA, a random set of larvae were removed from hatching trays, euthanized using an overdose of neutralized MS-222; whole gill baskets, yolk sac epithelium and body epithelium samples were taken for gene expression or enzymatic analyses. Tissue samples for gene expression were placed individually directly into 600 µl of ice-cold commercial lysis buffer (PureLink RNA mini kit, Ambion) and homogenized using a small plastic pestle and lysed by passing the homogenate through a 23-gauge needle three times. RNA was extracted from tissue samples using the PureLink RNA mini kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. DNAase treatment was performed using an on-column treatment (PureLink DNAse set, Ambion) also according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA concentration and purity were determined spectrophotometrically (Nanodrop ND-1000, Nanodrop Technologies) and RNA quality was assessed by running samples through a 1% agarose gel stained with RedSafe (FroggaBio). cDNA was synthesized from 200 ng total RNA using an oligo(dT17) primer and superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). mRNA expression of reference and target genes was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Total reactions (10 µl) consisted of 4 µl of diluted cDNA template, 5 µl of 2X SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad), 0.4 µl each of 100 µmol l−1 forward and reverse primers of the genes of interest (electronic supplementary material, table S2), and 0.2 µl nuclease-free water, and were performed using a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). The reaction mix was first heated to 98°C for 2 min to activate polymerase, followed by 40 amplification cycles of 2 s at 98°C and 5 s at the annealing temperature specific to the given primer pair (electronic supplementary material, table S2) which had been optimized beforehand. No template controls were conducted with every run and non-reverse transcribed controls were performed for every primer pair. Melt curve analyses confirmed the presence of a single PCR product for every gene of interest and the efficiency of amplification for every primer pair in each tissue type was between 95% and 110%. Relative expression of target genes was determined via the ΔΔCq method using both EF1-α and β-actin as reference genes. Expression was normalized to that of the gill at 3 dph using the CFX Manager v. 3.0 software.
For enzymatic analyses, each tissue was placed directly into 250 μl of ice-cold EGTA-Na deoxycholate homogenization buffer, flash frozen and stored at −80°C for later analysis. Pooling of samples (up to five) was necessary to detect enzyme activity in small tissues. Pooled samples were later homogenized in the EGTA-Na deoxycholate buffer in which they were stored. Na+/K+-ATPase, H+-ATPase and CA activities in homogenates were assayed using methods described previously [18,19]. Protein concentration of homogenates was measured with the Bradford reagent (Sigma) using a bovine serum albumen (Sigma) standard curve.
(i). Statistical analyses
All data are represented as means ± 1 s.e.m. (n = sample size) and statistical significance was accepted at the p < 0.05 level. All statistical and regression analyses were performed using SigmaPlot v. 10.0 with SigmaStat v. 3.5 integration (Systat Software, Inc.). In general, analyses comparing two means were performed using a two-tailed t-test, whereas analyses comparing three or more means were performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Holm–Sidak post hoc test. In the case of a failed normality test, data were square root or log transformed. Specific tests and normalization procedures used are described further in corresponding figure captions.
3. Results and discussion
The ontogeny of Jamm and
in larval rainbow trout appears to occur via an
-exchange complex as seen in the gills of adult trout [13]. Both Jamm and
shifted from the skin to the gills at the same time (15 dph) and were highly correlated over development at the gill (r2 = 0.951). Moreover, this shift occurred significantly earlier than that of MO2 (27 dph), confirming previous work [3] and providing strong support for the ionoregulatory hypothesis. The mRNA expression and/or enzyme activity of several of the key components of the
-exchange system also increased in the gills, including Rh and NHE, in accordance with the configuration observed in larval zebrafish [20]. The evolution of such exchange systems and metabolons may have occurred as an effective single solution to limitations in a number of cutaneous exchange processes (ions, acid equivalents, nitrogen wastes) over larval development.
(a). The ontogeny of branchial
exchange
Immediately following hatch, the skin represented the dominant site for both Jamm and
, accounting for 96.7 ± 2.0 and 86.5 ± 6.5% of total, respectively (figures 1 and 2). Over development, however, both absolute Jamm and absolute
by the gills increased while those by the skin remained relatively constant (figure 1). The cutaneous-to-branchial shift, at which 50% of a given process occurs via the gills, for Jamm occurred at 15.0 ± 0.7 dph, remarkably at exactly the same time as
(14.9 ± 1.2 dph), suggesting a coordinated ontogeny of both processes, potentially as
exchange. Indeed, both processes were observed to be highly correlated at the gills over development in rainbow trout (r2 = 0.951; figure 3) while, interestingly, such a relationship was not observed at the skin (data not shown). In adult fishes, this coupled exchange is coordinated by a complex consisting of a number of different components (reviewed in [13]). Perhaps the most integral part of the
-exchange complex is the Rh-NHE metabolon; recent evidence demonstrates that this metabolon is key to both Jamm and
in larval fishes [20–23]. In larval rainbow trout, gene expression of Rhcg2 in the gill, relative to 3 dph, increased significantly by 21 dph, whereas expression of Rhcg1 and NHE-2 increased significantly by CYA (figure 4a,b,d); Rhbg mRNA expression was unchanged in the gills over development (figure 4c). The branchial gene expression of three additional components, Na+/K+-ATPase, H+-ATPase and CA, increased significantly over larval development only in the case of Na+/K+-ATPase (figure 4e,f,g). However, the enzymatic activity of these components increased 6.2-, 4.8- and 4.2-fold from 3–21 dph (figure 5) for Na+/K+-ATPase, H+-ATPase and CA, respectively, potentially indicating the induction of at least part of the
-exchange system. Some discrepancies between gene expression and enzymatic activity may not be surprising given that H+-ATPase, for example, has many regulatory inputs at the post-transcriptional level (reviewed in [24]).
Figure 1.

Branchial (filled circles), cutaneous (open circles) and total (filled triangles) of (a) ammonia excretion (Jamm), (b) Na+ uptake (
), and (c) oxygen consumption (MO2) rates over development following hatching in rainbow trout. Asterisks represent cutaneous flux rates which differed significantly from corresponding branchial flux rates following CYA. A one-way ANOVA with a multi-comparison Holm–Sidak post hoc test (Dunn's method in the case of failed normality or equal variance tests) revealed that there was a significant difference in Jamm,
and MO2 between 0 and 21 days post-hatch. (n = 6–12) CYA, complete yolk sac absorption.
Figure 2.

Percentage of branchial (filled circles) and cutaneous (open circles) of (a) ammonia excretion (Jamm), (b) Na+ uptake (
) and (c) oxygen consumption (MO2) rates over development following hatching in rainbow trout larvae. Regression analyses were performed using SigmaPlot v. 10.0 with SigmaStat v. 3.5 integration (Systat Software, Inc.). P ≤ 0.0001 for all regressions. (n = 6–12) CYA, complete yolk sac absorption.
Figure 3.

The relationship between branchial ammonia excretion (Jamm) and Na+ uptake (
) over development following hatching in rainbow trout larvae. Regression analyses were performed using SigmaPlot v. 10.0 with SigmaStat 3.5 integration (Systat Software, Inc.). r2 = 0.951; p < 0.0001 (n = 6–12).
Figure 4.
Relative gene expression of (a) Rhcg1, (b) Rhcg2, (c) Rhbg, (d) Na+/H+-exchanger-2 (NHE-2), (e) Na+/K+-ATPase, (f) H+-ATPase and (g) CA at 3, 12 and 21 days post-hatch (dph) and after CYA in the gills (black bars), yolk sac epithelium (grey bars) and body epithelium (dark grey bars) of developing rainbow trout larvae. Gene expression is relative to the expression of both EF1-α and β-actin and is normalized to the expression seen in the gill at 3 dph. Means within a given tissue across time points which do not share the same letter are significantly different from one another. Asterisks represent yolk sac epithelium means which differ significantly from gill means within a given time point and double asterisks represent body epithelium means which differ significantly from both gill and yolk sac epithelium means within a given time point. (n = 4–6) CYA, complete yolk sac absorption.
Figure 5.

Enzymatic activities of (a) Na+/K+-ATPase, (b) H+-ATPase, (c) CA at 3, 12 and 21 days post-hatch (dph) and after CYA in the gills (black bars), yolk sac epithelium (grey bars) and body epithelium (dark grey bars) of developing rainbow trout larvae. Means within a given tissue across time points which do not share the same letter are significantly different from one another. Asterisks represent yolk sac epithelium means which differ significantly from gill means within a given time point and double asterisks represent body epithelium means which differ significantly from both gill and yolk sac epithelium means within a given time point. (n = 6–12) CYA, complete yolk sac absorption.
These observations suggest that the ontogeny of branchial
exchange is coordinated by the same exchange complex as seen in the gill of adult freshwater fishes [13] and zebrafish larvae [20] and that this arrangement is present at the onset of branchial Jamm and
. In the present larval trout, such a configuration does not appear to exist at the skin. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, cutaneous Jamm and
(figure 1) and the gene expression and enzyme activity of several of the key components of
-exchange in cutaneous epithelia (yolk sac and body; figures 4 and 5) remained relatively constant over larval development. This may suggest alternate mechanisms of transport, consistent with differentiation of distinct gill and skin epithelial surfaces. Moreover, the decrease in relative importance of cutaneous routes over development appears to be a function of increasing branchial exchange, rather than decreasing cutaneous exchange.
(b). Evidence supporting a novel element of the ionoregulatory hypothesis
The coordinated cutaneous-to-branchial shifts for Jamm and
at 15 dph occurred significantly earlier in development than the shift for MO2 at 26.6 ± 2.0 dph (by extrapolation, figure 2). These results are in agreement with and nearly identical to those of Fu et al. [3], which provided support for the ionoregulatory hypothesis using a direct physiological approach. The independent replication of these results [3] and the wealth of indirect histological evidence that exists (reviewed in [4,9]) provide concrete support for the ionoregulatory hypothesis. Moreover, these findings provide evidence for an additional critical element of the ionoregulatory hypothesis, demonstrating that the ontogeny of branchial Na+ uptake occurs as
exchange.
(c). What is the earliest gill function?
An effective mechanism for excretion of ammonia, the third respiratory gas [10], may be critically important in developing fishes. During larval development, metabolism is fuelled by the catabolism of amino acids obtained from yolk proteins, leading to the release of potentially toxic ammonia. Embryonic fishes, surrounded by the chorion, accumulate a substantial load of metabolic ammonia prior to hatch [25,26]. Whole-body Tamm build-up, which continued even after hatch (figure 6), could potentially be attenuated by gill development. Prior to the cutaneous-to-branchial shift for Jamm, whole-body Tamm accumulated at a rate of 0.18 µmol g d−1 over the first 15 dph while from 15 to 21 dph, Tamm accumulation slowed to a rate of 0.06 µmol g d−1 (figure 6). Similarly, ammonia turnover time increased over development until reaching a peak at 12–15 dph (figure 6), again coinciding with the cutaneous-to-branchial shift for Jamm (figure 2). Thereafter, ammonia turnover time decreased steadily, suggesting that the ontogeny of branchial Jamm might allow for a more effective clearance of metabolic ammonia. This may be a particularly critical event in early development given the eventual loss of ureogenic capacity which is used in embryonic stages to limit the accumulation of metabolic ammonia [25,27].
Figure 6.
Ammonia turnover times (bars) and whole-body Tamm (circles) over development following hatching in rainbow trout larvae. Ammonia turnover time means not sharing the same letter are significantly different from one another as determined by a one-way ANOVA followed by a Holm–Sidak post hoc test following normalization by square root and log transformation, respectively. The dotted line signifies the cutaneous-to-branchial shift for ammonia excretion (15 dph). (n = 6) CYA, complete yolk sac absorption.
The acquisition of mineral ions required by larval growth, however, is also critical to larval development (reviewed in [4]). The simultaneous ontogeny of branchial Jamm and
may function to coordinate the elimination of nitrogenous waste, the acquisition of Na+ and the removal of metabolic acid. At present, it is unclear which of these processes would be the first to be truly limited by cutaneous exchange, necessitating its branchial shift. Gill ablation studies have demonstrated clearly that branchial Na+ uptake is vital to larval survival earlier in development than branchial O2 uptake [28] and similar studies may be useful in determining at which point in development branchial ammonia excretion and acid-base exchange become critical.
(d). Future perspectives
This study, in addition to further affirming and adding a novel element to the ionoregulatory hypothesis, provides evidence that the
-exchange complex develops at the onset of branchial ontogeny. An interesting avenue for future research is the examination of the selective pressures which led to the evolution of such coupled exchanges. Interestingly, in hagfish, extant relatives of the most ancestral jawless fishes, all of the components of the
-exchange complex are expressed in the gills [29,30] yet these fish display only Na+/H+ exchange and not
exchange [31], despite ammonia being the dominant form of nitrogenous waste excreted and the gills accounting for the majority of its excretion [29,32]. The question of why and when different branchial exchange metabolons evolved in fishes is an interesting one and may lead to a better overall understanding of the arrangement of branchial ionoregulatory, acid-base and nitrogen excretion mechanisms in modern fishes.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Clarice Fu and Colin Brauner who were integral in initial phases of this project, to Dr Michele Nawata and Dr Jean-Paul Paluzzi for their assistance with qPCR techniques, and to two anonymous referees for constructive comments.
Ethics statement
All experimental procedures were approved by the animal care committee of McMaster University.
Data accessibility
Data used in figures are available through the Dryad repository (doi:10.5061/dryad.4b4rb).
Funding statement
Funded by NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) Discovery grants to P.A.W. and C.M.W. who is also supported by the Canada Research Chair Program. A.M.Z. is supported by an NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship.
References
- 1.Evans D, Piermarini P, Choe K. 2005. The multifunctional fish gill: dominant site of gas exchange, osmoregulation, acid-base regulation, and excretion of nitrogenous waste. Physiol. Rev. 85, 97–177. ( 10.1152/physrev.00050.2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wells P, Pinder A. 1996. The respiratory development of Atlantic salmon. II. Partitioning of oxygen uptake among gills, yolk sac and body surfaces. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 2737–2744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fu C, Wilson JM, Rombough PJ, Brauner CJ. 2010. Ions first: Na+ uptake shifts from the skin to the gills before O2 uptake in developing rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 1553–1560. ( 10.1098/rspb.2009.1545) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rombough PJ. 2007. The functional ontogeny of the teleost gill: which comes first, gas or ion exchange? Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 148, 732–742. ( 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.03.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Krogh A. 1941. The comparative physiology of respiratory mechanisms. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li J, Eygensteyn J, Lock RAC, Verbost PM, Van Der Heijden AJH, Wendellar Bonga SE, Flik G. 1995. Branchial chloride cells in larvae and juveniles of freshwater tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus. J. Exp. Biol. 198, 2177–2184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gonzalez ME, Blanquez MJ, Rojo C. 1996. Early gill development in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Morphol. 229, 201–217. () [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rombough PJ. 1999. The gill of fish larvae. Is it primarily a respiratory or an ionoregulatory structure? J. Fish Biol. 55, 186–204. ( 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb01055.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brauner CJ, Rombough PJ. 2012. Ontogeny and paleophysiology of the gill: new insights from larval and air-breathing fish. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 184, 293–300. ( 10.1016/j.resp.2012.07.011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Randall DJ, IP YK. 2006. Ammonia as a respiratory gas in water and air-breathing fishes. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 154, 216–225. ( 10.1016/j.resp.2006.04.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wright PA, Fyhn JH. 2001. Ontogeny of nitrogen metabolism and excretion. In Fish physiology, vol. 20 (eds Wright PA, Anderson P.), pp. 149–186. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Randall DJ, Tsui TKN. 2002. Ammonia toxicity in fish. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 45, 17–23. ( 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00227-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wright PA, Wood CM. 2009. A new paradigm for ammonia excretion in aquatic animals: role of Rhesus (Rh) glycoproteins. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 2303–2312. ( 10.1242/jeb.023085) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.McFarland WN. 1959. A study of the effects of anesthetics on the behaviour and physiology of fishes. Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. Univ. Tex. 6, 23–55. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Verdouw H, van Echteld CJA, Dekkers EMJ. 1978. Ammonia determination based on indophenols formation with sodium salicylate. Water Res. 12, 399–402. ( 10.1016/0043-1354(78)90107-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boutilier RG, Heming TA, Iwama GK. 1984. Physiochemical parameters for use in fish respiratory physiology. In Fish physiology, vol. 10 (eds Hoar WS, Randall DJ.), pp. 403–430. New York, NY: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zimmer AM, Brauner CJ, Wood CM. 2014. Ammonia transport across the skin of adult rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to high environmental ammonia (HEA). J. Comp. Physiol. B 184, 77–90. ( 10.1007/s00360-013-0784-x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nawata CM, Hung CCY, Tsui TKN, Wilson JM, Wright PA, Wood CM. 2007. Ammonia excretion in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): evidence for Rh glycoprotein and H+-ATPase involvement. Physiol. Genomics 31, 463–474. ( 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00061.2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zimmer AM, Barcarolli IF, Wood CM, Bianchini A. 2012. Waterborne copper exposure inhibits ammonia excretion and branchial carbonic anhydrase activity in euryhaline guppies acclimated to both fresh water and sea water. Aquat. Toxicol. 122–123, 172–180. ( 10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.06.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kumai Y, Perry SF. 2011. Ammonia excretion via Rhcg1 facilitates Na+ uptake in larval zebrafish, Danio rerio, in acidic water. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 301, R1517–R1528. ( 10.1152/ajpregu.00282.2011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shih T-H, Horng J-L, Hwang P-P, Lin L-Y. 2008. Ammonia excretion by the skin of zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 295, 1625–1632. ( 10.1152/ajpcell.00255.2008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu S-C, Horng J-L, Liu S-T, Hwang P-P, Wen Z-H, Lin C-S, Lin L-Y. 2010. Ammonium-dependent sodium uptake in mitochondrion-rich cells of medaka (Oryzias latipes) larvae. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 298, 237–250. ( 10.1152/ajpcell.00373.2009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shih T-H, Horng J-L, Liu S-T, Hwang P-P, Lin L-Y. 2012. Rhcg1 and NHE3b are involved in ammonium-dependent sodium uptake by zebrafish larvae acclimated to low-sodium water. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 302, R84–R93. ( 10.1152/ajpregu.00318.2011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Beyenbach KW, Wieczorek H. 2006. The V-type H+ ATPase: molecular structure and function, physiological roles and regulation. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 577–589. ( 10.1242/jeb.02014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wright PA, Felskie A, Anderson P. 1995. Induction of ornithine-urea cycle enzymes and nitrogen metabolism and excretion in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) during early life stages. J. Exp. Biol. 198, 127–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Essex-Fraser PA, Steele SL, Bernier NJ, Murray BW, Stevens ED, Wright PA. 2005. Expression of four glutamine synthetase genes in the early stages of development of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in relationship to nitrogen excretion. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 20 268–20 273. ( 10.1074/jbc.M412338200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Korte JJ, Salo WL, Cabrera VM, Wright PA, Felski AK, Anderson PM. 1997. Expression of carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase III mRNA during the early stages of development and in muscle of adult rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6270–6277. ( 10.1074/jbc.272.10.6270) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rombough PJ. 2002. Gills are needed for ionoregulation before they are needed for O2 uptake in developing zebrafish, Danio rerio. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 1787–1794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Braun MH, Perry SF. 2010. Ammonia and urea excretion in the Pacific hagfish Eptatretus stoutii: evidence for the involvement of Rh and UT proteins. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 157, 405–415. ( 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.08.020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tresguerres M, Parks SK, Goss GG. 2006. V-H+-ATPase, Na+/K+-ATPase and NHE2 immunoreactivity in the gill epithelium of the Pacific hagfish (Eptatretus stoutii). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 145, 312–321. ( 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.06.045) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Evans DH. 1984. Gill Na+/H+ and Cl−/HCO3− exchange systems evolved before the vertebrates entered fresh water. J. Exp. Biol. 113, 465–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Clifford AM, Guffey SC, Goss GG. 2014. Extrabranchial mechanisms of system pH recovery in hagfish (Eptatretus stoutii). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 168, 82–89. ( 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.11.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data used in figures are available through the Dryad repository (doi:10.5061/dryad.4b4rb).



