Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience logoLink to Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
. 2014 Sep;16(3):335–344. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2014.16.3/pkenny

Epigenetics, microRNA, and addiction

Epigenética, micro ARNs y adicciones

Épigénétique, microARN et addiction

Paul J Kenny 1,*
PMCID: PMC4214176  PMID: 25364284

Abstract

Drug addiction is characterized by uncontrolled drug consumption and high rates of relapse to drug taking during periods of attempted abstinence. Addiction is now largely considered a disorder of experience-dependent neuroplasticity, driven by remodeling of synapses in reward and motivation relevant brain circuits in response to a history of prolonged drug intake. Alterations in gene expression play a central role in addiction-relevant neuroplasticity, but the mechanisms by which additive drugs remodel brain motivation circuits remains unclear. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of noncoding RNA that can regulate the expression of large numbers of protein-coding mRNA transcripts by binding to the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) of target transcripts and blocking their translation into the encoded protein or triggering their destabilization and degradation. Emerging evidence has implicated miRNAs in regulating addiction-relevant neuroplasticity in the brain, and in controlling the motivational properties of cocaine and other drugs of abuse. Here, the role for miRNAs in regulating basic aspects of neuronal function is reviewed. The involvement of miRNAs in controlling the motivational properties of addictive drugs is also summarized. Finally, mechanisms by which miRNAs exert their actions on drug intake, when known, are considered.

Keywords: addiction, cocaine, nicotine, opiate, amphetamine, MeCP2, BDNF, miR-212

Introduction

Over 34 million Americans aged 12 or over report lifetime use of cocaine, with an estimated 1 million new users of cocaine each year.1 The negative health and economic consequences of cocaine use on society are considerable, with cocaine use associated with potentially fatal cardiovascular events such as arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, and cerebral hemorrhage. In common with other substance-use disorders, cocaine addiction is characterized by a compulsive need to seek and take the drug, a loss of control over the amount of drug consumed, and by periods of attempted abstinence closely followed by relapse to drug-taking behavior.2 The mechanisms by which cocaine comes to dominate the behavioral repertoire in this manner remain unclear. Emerging evidence suggests that cocaine and other addictive drugs modify the transcriptional landscape of neurons in brain reinforcement circuits and drive the increasing control over behavior exerted by the drug. Cocaine can modify gene expression, and hence neuronal function, at the transcriptional and translational level. Much current work is focused on understanding the chromatin-modifying actions of cocaine that influence gene expression levels.3 However, far less is known about the mechanisms by which cocaine impacts gene translation. As described below, microRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding regulatory RNAs that play key roles in regulating protein translation and that have been recently implicated in regulating the addiction-relevant behavioral effects of cocaine in rodents.

Modeling compulsive drug intake in rodents

In order to investigate the underlying neurobiology of compulsive cocaine intake, it is necessary to employ an animal model that accurately recapitulates many aspects of the compulsive cocaine seeking seen in human addicts. Loss of control over the amount of drug consumed marks the transition from controlled drug use to the compulsive drug intake that is a central feature of addiction. Periods of extended drug availability and resultant excessive drug consumption are likely a critical factor triggering the development of compulsive drug seeking in humans and a loss of control over intake.4-8 Indeed, in human drug users a sudden increase in drug availability can precipitate the transition from low to high (and increasingly uncontrolled) levels of drug use.9-11 Such “escalating” levels of drug consumption by human drug users in response to increased drug availability can be observed for most drugs of abuse.9,12,13 Animal studies utilizing the intravenous cocaine selfadministration procedure have shown that periods of extended daily access to cocaine and other addictive drugs can trigger escalating cocaine intake in rats similar to that observed in human drug users.7,11,14,15 Rodents also show escalating levels of intake during extended daily access to self-administered heroin,16 nicotine,17 or methamphetamine.18 Prolonged access to cocaine also results in the development of drug-seeking responses (lever presses) that become progressively less sensitive to the suppressant effects of a noxious stimulus (cue that predicts the onset of aversive footshocks).14 This compulsive-like responding for cocaine in rats is similar to the drug seeking observed in human addicts that persists even in the face of negative social, economic, and/or health consequences associated with their drug habit.2 Prolonged cocaine intake (>3 months) can trigger cocaine responding that persists even when drug delivery is directly paired with punishing electric shock.15 Thus, a history of extended drug access can induce an addiction-like state in rats, characterized by a loss of control over the amounts of drug consumed (reflected in escalating daily intake),7,11,14,15 and drug seeking that is impervious to negative outcome.5,8,19 Understanding the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of these processes in rats may reveal novel insights into the addiction state in humans.

Role of the striatum in cocaine addiction

The psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine and other drugs of abuse are related to increases in dopamine levels in the corpus striatum.20-22 Ventral domains of the striatum, particularly the shell region of the nucleus acumbens and the olfactory turbercle, play an important role in the rewarding effects of cocaine in rodents upon initial exposure to the drug.23,24 The core region of the nucleus accumbens appears to be important for the satiating effects of cocaine,25,26 and may also regulate the enhancement of drug seeking that is observed in the presence of response-contingent pavlovian cues.27,28 By contrast, the dorsal striatum does not appear to play a role in the motivational properties of cocaine or other addictive drugs, although cocaine and other drugs increase extracellular dopamine levels in this brain region.23,29 Instead, it seems that the dorsal striatum is ”recruited“ by repeated drug intake and contributes to the enhancement of drug-seeking induced response-contingent pavlovian cues after overtraining.30 Similarly, the dorsal striatum regulates habitual31 and punishmentresistant32 drug-seeking behaviors that emerge after extensive exposure to the drug. This suggests that ventral portions of the striatum control the acute reinforcing properties of addictive drugs, whereas dorsal striatum regulates the habit-like consumption that defines addiction. Understanding these mechanisms by which cocaine rewires the striatum to drive compulsive-like drug-seeking responses may reveal novel treatment strategies for drug addiction.

Mechanisms of drug addiction

Susceptibility to substance abuse disorders aggregates in families, with rates of drug abuse higher among relatives of drug-dependent individuals than in the general population.33,34 There is approximately a 4- to 8-fold increase in risk of substance abuse disorders in individuals with an affected first-degree family member across a wide range of abused substances, including cocaine, alcohol, nicotine, opiates, and cannabis.34-36 The transmission of vulnerability to substance abuse is largely independent of familial aggregation of other psychiatric disorders.35-38 Adoption studies have shown far greater similarities between substance abuse phenotypes with biological relatives than with adoptive family members.39,40 Further, heritability of substance-abuse disorders is significantly higher in monozygotic compared with dizygotic twins.41 Indeed, data from twins suggest that approximately 50% of vulnerability to addiction is heritable.40 Genetic transmission of substance-abuse disorders does not appear to follow simple Mendelian inheritance. In common with other complex diseases, substance-abuse disorders instead appear to depend on the contribution of multiple susceptibility genes that act in concert with epigenetic and environmental factors to increase vulnerability to addiction.39,41-44 Taken together, these observations support a strong genetic component to addiction vulnerability.

Although there is a strong genetic component to vulnerability, at its root addiction to cocaine and other drugs of abuse is considered a drug-induced disorder of neuroplasticity.43,45-55 Indeed, cocaine addiction can be conceptualized as a disorder in which excessive cocaine consumption, in conjunction with genetic and environmental influences, manifests enduring neuroplasticity in brain circuitries that regulate reward and cognitive and emotional processing, and it is this plasticity that drives compulsive drug seeking. With the emerging appreciation that maladaptive neuroplasticity mechanisms drive addiction, much emphasis has been placed on such adaptations in addiction-related brain areas. In particular, considering that cocaine and all other major drugs of abuse increase dopamine transmission in the mesocorticolimbic system,56 dopamine-dependent plasticity in mesocorticolimbic neurons has been a major focus of investigation. Nestler and colleagues have shown that cocaine engages “epigenetic” machinery in brain reward circuitries, and that this action influences gene expression in response to cocaine and thereby controls behavioral responses to the drug. Indeed, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays from mouse striatal tissues have revealed that chronic cocaine treatment induced marked increases in acetylation state of core histones in the promoter regions of the FosB, brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), and Cdk5 genes,44 which have all been implicated in regulating the motivational properties of cocaine. Histone acetylation is catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and deacetylation is catalyzed by histone deacetylases (HDACs). HDACs catalyze the removal of acetyl groups from histone tails, resulting in more tightly compacted DNA-histone complexes, decreased access of transcription factors to gene promoter regions, and reductions in gene expression. Importantly, chronic but not acute cocaine treatment decreased the function of histone deacetylase 5 (HDAC5) in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) of mice,57 an action of cocaine that may explain the observed increase in acetylation of core histones in the promoter regions of FosB, BDNF, and Cdk5 genes and the wellcharacterized increase in the expression of their associated proteins after chronic cocaine exposure.58-62 Further, viral-mediated overexpression of HDACs in striatal tissues decreased,44,57 whereas genetic or pharmacological knockout of striatal HDACs increased sensitivity to the rewarding effects of cocaine, as measured in a place conditioning procedure.44,57 These data demonstrate that cocaine-induced modifications in histone acetylation state play a critical role in regulating the effects of cocaine in mice. More recently, histone methylation and other chromatin modifications, and even DNA methylation status, have all been implicated in regulating cocaine-induced changes in gene expression in brain reward systems.3,63-67

MicroRNAs: role in the central nervous system

In addition to regulating gene expression, cocaine may also influence neuroplastic responses in brain reward systems by influencing gene translation. One recently implicated mechanism of post-transcriptional gene regulation through which cocaine may act is through the miRNAs. The miRNAs are a class of small ncRNAs68-70 that regulate gene expression through direct binding to the 3' UTR of gene targets and blocking their translation into encoded protein or triggering their destabilization and degradation.71 Many hundreds of miRNA species have been identified in plants and animals.72-76 In animals, miRNAs bind to the 3'UTR of target transcripts by incomplete complementary base-pairing, particularly at a portion of the 5' end of the miRNA termed the miRNA “seed” region. This imprecise complementary base-pairing means that potentially many hundreds of mammalian gene transcripts can be regulated by a single miRNA.

Expression profiling has shown that the expression levels of many miRNAs is dynamically regulated during development,77,78 consistent with an emerging understanding for their important role in the development of brain structure and function.77,78 Dicer-deficient zebrafish, which lack all mature miRNAs, displayed marked defects in neural development.79,80 In Drosophila, dicer null mutation results in accumulation of pathogenic polyglutamine protein, a potent neurodegenerative agent.81 Further, deletion of miR-8 in flies can directly drive neurodegeneration.82 In mice, it was recently shown that miR-124 plays a critical role in differentiation of progenitor cells to mature neurons,83 similar to its role in zebrafish described above.80 Further, conditioned deletion of Dicer in Purkinje cells of mice resulted in cell-specific death of these cells, degradation of the cerebellum (within which Purkinje cells are located), and concomitant development of ataxia.84 These findings demonstrate that miRNAs play a central role in neuronal development and survival.

In addition to their role in brain development, miRNAs also play a key role in adult brain function. By combining laser capture with multiplex real-time PCR, hundreds of miRNAs have been shown to demonstrate somatodendritic localization within mature neurons.85 Based on this spatial pattern of expression, it is likely that miRNAs also play a role in the later stages of neuronal maturation and synapse formation.77,78 Indeed, miRNAs can be transported away from their site of formation in the cell body of neurons to points of synaptic contact, implying a role for such miRNAs in synaptic development and plasticity.86 Memory formation in Drosophila can drive degradation of the RISC-associated protein Armitage that is localized to the synapse.87 This action results in the release of mRNAs (eg, CaMKII mRNA) that had been targeted for degradation in a RISC-dependent manner87 and induction of memory-dependent protein synthesis.87 In addition to Armitage, and its mammalian equivalent, Moloney leukemia virus 10 MOV10, several other important components of the miRNA biosynthesis cascade, such as Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP),88-90 are also localized to sites of synaptic contacts and regulate synaptic function. Indeed, FMRP has been shown to regulate the actions of many CNS-enriched miRNAs on neuronal morphology and dendritic spine development.91-95 Considering their enrichment at the synapse, it was proposed that miRNAs may play an important role in the induction and stabilization of long-term memories.87,96 Indeed, there is now overwhelming evidence that miRNAs regulate almost all aspects of memory-associated structural and functional plasticity in brain; for recent references see refs 97,103.

Role for miRNAs in the rewarding effects of cocaine

To determine if miRNAs may play a role in regulating the motivational effects of addictive drugs, we recently examined the effects of conditionally deleting Argonaut 2 (Ago2) in D2 receptor-expressing medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in striatum. These neurons, also known as striatopallidal or “indirect” neurons, are thought to play a key role in response inhibition, with deficits in their function perhaps contributing to the development of compulsive drug use.104 Ago2 is a core component of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which regulates the maturation and function of miRNAs. Deletion of Ago2 broadly in striatopallidal neurons was achieved by breeding Ago.fl/fl mice with mice expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the D2 receptor promoter. It was found that brain anatomy and striatal integrity were not impacted but, as expected, miRNA expression and function was disrupted by deletion of Ago2 in these neurons.105 Importantly, this genetic manipulation abolished the rewarding effects of cocaine, measured using a conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure.105 Processes independent of drug reinforcement, such as spatial learning deficits, can confound CPP. Therefore, to more rigorously investigate the involvement of striatal miRNAs in the motivational properties of cocaine we assessed intravenous cocaine self-administration in the Ago2-D2-ablated mice. Mutant animals self-administered far less cocaine than control mice across the entire cocaine dose-response curve when tested under a 1-h session on a fixed ratio 5 time-out 20 sec schedule of reinforcement use.104 Responding for food was not impacted in the mutant mice responding under the same reinforcement schedule,104 suggesting that decreased cocaine intake was not secondary to deficits in behavioral performance.

The above findings support a role for miRNAs in striatum in regulating drug reward, but which miRNAs are involved? Many laboratories have identified specific miRNAs whose expression is altered by exposure to drugs of abuse and that may play a role in regulating their motivational properties. Indeed, expression of various miRNAs is altered in the prefrontal cortex, striatum and other addiction-relevant brain sites in response to exposure to drugs of abuse. As detailed lists describing which miRNAs are altered in response to particular drugs are presented elsewhere, these effects won't be considered here.106-112 Instead, the impact of altering expression of specific miRNAs on the motivational properties of addictive drugs will be considered. Chandresekar and Dreyer have shown that the miRNAs, miRNA-124a and let-7d, were downregulated in striatum in response to cocaine treatment.113 Moreover, virus-mediated overexpression of these miRNAs in striatum decreased expression of BDNF and the dopamine D3 receptor, two key regulators of drug-seeking behaviors.113 This suggests that miRNA-124a and let-7d may regulate cocaine-induced remodeling of the striatum and thereby influence the motivational properties of the drug. Consistent with this possibility, overexpression of these miRNAs in striatum, specifically in the nucleus accumbens region, decreased the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine, whereas their inhibition increased these effects, as measured using a CPP procedure.114

Role for miRNAs in regulating cocaine intake

As noted above, rats permitted to self-administer cocaine during extended (≥ 6 h) but not restricted (1 h) daily session demonstrate the emergence of compulsivelike cocaine intake, including escalation of daily cocaine intake reminiscent of the increasingly uncontrolled intake seen in human addicts bingeing on the drug. Our laboratory has used miRNA gene expression arrays to characterize miRNA expression profiles in striatum of cocaine-naive rats and in rats with restricted or extended daily access to cocaine. We also assessed miRNA expression in “yoked” rats that received cocaine infusions noncontingently when rats in the extended access group volitionally consumed the drug. We found that two miRNAs, miR-212 and miR-132, were upregulated in the striatum of the extended access rats 24 hours after the last cocaine self-administration session relative to the yoked, restricted access and cocaine-naive control groups.115 We verified these findings using Taqman assay.115 These two miRNAs are arrayed in tandem in the miR-212/132 cluster located on chromosome 17 in humans and chromosome 10 in rats.116 As such, both miRNAs are thought to function similarly. Next, to investigate the potential role for the miR-212/132 cluster in regulating cocaine intake we used a lentivirus to overexpress miR-212 in striatum of rats (Lenti-miR-212 rats) and assess the impact on self-administration behavior. We found that miR-212 overexpression did not impact cocaine intake in rats with restricted access.115 By contrast, striatal miR-212 overexpression strikingly reduced the motivation to consume cocaine in rats with extended access to the drug, reflected in progressively decreasing levels of cocaine intake across sessions.115 This progressively increasing inhibitory effect of miR212 on cocaine intake is opposite to the escalating rates of cocaine consumption typically observed in extended access rats. Conversely, disruption of miR-212 signaling in striatum, achieved through local infusion of an antisense oligonucleotide against miR-212, accelerated the emergence of escalated cocaine intake in extended access rats.115 These data suggest that miRNAs can regulate cocaine intake and potentially impact the development of compulsive consumption of the drug.

The mechanisms by which miR-212 influences cocaine intake has also been explored. The miR-212/132 gene cluster is highly responsive to the cAMP signaling cascade, with both miRNAs upregulated by cAMP response element binding protein (CREB).116,117 We found that levels of phosphorylated (activated) CREB are increased in striatum of rats with extended but not restricted cocaine access115 — those that show upregulated miR-212 levels. An emerging theme in the miRNA field is the observation that miRNAs often feedback onto the signaling cascade that triggered alterations in their expression to amplify or curtail activity of these same signaling cascades.118 As CREB activity is known to regulate the motivational properties of cocaine,119-121 we investigated the possibility that miR-212 may regulate CREB activity. We found that miR-212 dramatically boosts CREB signaling in cultured cells and in the striatum of rats.115 We used a hypothesis-driven approach to identify the gene targets for miR-212 that may explain its actions on CREB. It is known that Rafl kinase can phosphorylate adenylyl cyclases to sensitize their activity, thereby increasing cAMP production and CREB activation, eg ref 123. Interestingly, SPRED1 is a known inhibitor of Rafl activity and also a predicted target of miR-212 (www.targetscan.com). We found that miR-212 can repress SPRED1 expression in cultured cells and in striatum115), and thereby activates Rafl, which stimulates CREB activity. Moreover, we showed that enhancing CREB activity in striatum (accomplished by overexpressing the CREB coactivator CRTC1) decreased cocaine intake in rats with extended access to the drug. These findings show that mir-212 plays a key role in regulating cocaine intake and highlight an emerging signaling ”motif“ in which miRNAs play central roles in regulating signaling strength in neurons by controlling the activity of signaling cascades that modify their expression.

Role for miRNAs in regulating alcohol intake

In addition to cocaine and other psychomotor stimulants, miRNAs have also been shown to regulate the motivational properties of alcohol. Volitional alcohol intake decreased miR-124a expression in the dorsolateral portion of the striatum of rats,123 and virus-mediated overexpression of miR-124a in striatum decreased alcohol-induced CPP and reduced alcohol drinking in rats.123 Li and coworkers have shown that alcohol consumption by rats decreased expression of miR-382 in accumbens in rats.124 It was also shown that miR-382 negatively regulates dopamine DI receptor expression, and thereby attenuates alcohol-induced increases in the transcription factor AFosB,124 known to play an important role in the rewarding effects of alcohol and other addictive drugs.125 Importantly, virus-mediated overexpression of miR-382 in accumbens attenuated alcoholinduced increases in AFosB expression and reduced alcohol intake in rats.124 Most recently, Tapocik and colleagues have shown that escalating levels of alcohol intake in alcohol-dependent rats increased expression of miR-206 in prefrontal cortex,126 a miRNA thought to play an important role in cellular responses to stress but also shown to play a key role in muscle development and cancer.127 Expression of miR-206 was unaltered by alcohol in accumbens or amygdala.127 It is established that miR-206 negatively regulates expression of brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF),128-131 which is known to play a key role in the motivational effects of alcohol and other addictive drugs.132 Accordingly, it was found that alcohol-induced upregulation of miR-206 in prefrontal cortex was associated with a decrease in BDNF expression.127 Moreover, virus-mediated miR206 overexpression also decreased BDNF expression and accelerated the development of escalating levels of alcohol intake in rats.127

Transcription factor-miRNA interactions control sensitivity to drug reward

As noted above, an emerging theme in miRNA biology is the fact that miRNAs will often feed back onto the same signaling cascades that regulate their expression. The repressive effect of miRNAs on translation make them ideally suited to fulfill such feedback roles in moderating signaling cascades,118 which may serve to stabilize signaling cascades by protecting against random fluctuations and facilitate stable cellular states.133 Considering the pronounced effects of miR-212, and other miRNAs described above, in regulating the motivation to self-administer addictive drugs, our laboratory has investigated the transcriptional mechanisms by which miR-212 (and other miRNAs) expression is controlled. Loss-of-function mutations or duplications of the methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2) gene cause Rett syndrome (RTT) in humans,134,135 a neurodevelopmental disorder associated with severe mental retardation. MeCP2 is an epigenetic factor that binds to methylated cytosine residues of CpG dinucleotides in DNA and can recruit HDACs and other transcriptional repressors to inactivate target gene expression.136 Interestingly, MeCP2 expression is known to be negatively regulated by miR-212.137 We found that MeCP2 level's were increased in the striatum of rats with extended but not restricted daily access to cocaine,137 and that virusmediated knockdown of MeCP2 in striatum enhanced the effects of cocaine on miR-212 expression.138 We also found that MecP2 knockdown in striatum dramatically decreased cocaine intake in rats. This effect was reversed by antisense oligonucleotide-mediated inhibition of miR-212 signaling expression.137 These findings suggest that MecP2 attenuates cocaine-induced increases in miR-212 activity and increases the motivation to consume cocaine and that, in turn, miR-212 negatively regulates MeCP2 expression. Hence, homeostatic interactions between miR-212 and MeCP2 are likely to play an important role in regulating sensitivity to the motivational effects of cocaine.

Conclusions and future directions

The above findings demonstrate that miRNAs, including miR-212, regulate the motivational properties of drugs of abuse. miRNAs regulate drug intake by impacting a wide range of downstream signaling cascades known to influence the rewarding properties of addictive drugs. This highlights the pleiotropic nature of miRNAs and how well-positioned they are to orchestrate intracellular signaling events in order to control the motivational properties of drugs. Important areas of future research will include achieving a more in-depth understanding of the intracellular signaling cascades, and broader understanding of impacted biological functions, impacted by addiction-relevant miRNAs. Also important will be understanding the mechanisms by which miRNAs activities are regulated, from miRNA transcription to the protein complexes that direct their activities.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA025983). PJK is a consultant for Pfizer, Inc. and is a shareholder in Eolas Therapeutics, Inc

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wright D., Sathe N. State Estimates of Substance Use from the 2002-2003 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (DhthtS Publication No. SMA 05-3989, NSDUH Series H-26). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nestler EJ. Epigenetic mechanisms of drug addiction. Neuropharmacology. 2014;76 Pt B:259–268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wikler A. A psychodynamic study of a patient during experimental self-regulated re-addiction to morphine. Psychiatr Q. 1952;26:270–293. doi: 10.1007/BF01568465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ahmed SH., Koob GF. Transition to drug addiction: a negative reinforcement model based on an allostatic decrease in reward function. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;180:473–490. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2180-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ahmed SH. Imbalance between drug and non-drug reward availability: a major risk factor for addiction. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;526:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.09.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ahmed SH., Koob GF. Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science. 1998;282:298–300. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5387.298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kenny PJ. Brain reward systems and compulsive drug use. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007;28:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gawin FH., Ellinwood EH Jr. Cocaine dependence. Annu Rev Med. 1989;40:149–161. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.40.020189.001053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kramer JC., Fischman VS., Littlefield DC. Amphetamine abuse. Pattern and effects of high doses taken intravenously. JAMA. 1967;201:305–309. doi: 10.1001/jama.201.5.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ahmed SH., Kenny PJ., Koob GF., Markou A. Neurobiological evidence for hedonic allostasis associated with escalating cocaine use. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:625–626. doi: 10.1038/nn872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Siegel RK. Changing patterns of cocaine use: longitudinal observations, consequences, and treatment. NIDA Res Monogr. 1984;50:92–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ferri CP., Gossop M., Laranjeira RR. High dose cocaine use in Sao Paulo: a comparison of treatment and community samples. Subst Use Misuse. 2001;36:237–255. doi: 10.1081/ja-100102624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vanderschuren U., Everitt BJ. Drug seeking becomes compulsive after prolonged cocaine self-administration. Science. 2004;305:1017–1019. doi: 10.1126/science.1098975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Deroche-Gamonet V., Belin D., Piazza PV. Evidence for addiction-like behavior in the rat. Science. 2004;305:1014–1017. doi: 10.1126/science.1099020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ahmed SH., Walker JR., Koob GF. Persistent increase in the motivation to take heroin in rats with a history of drug escalation. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000;22:413–421. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00133-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.George O., Ghozland S., Azar MR., et al CRF-CRF1 system activation mediates withdrawal-induced increases in nicotine self-administration in nicotine-dependent rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:17198–17203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707585104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kitamura O., Wee S., Specie SE., Koob GF., Pulvirenti L. Escalation of methamphetamine self-administration in rats: a dose-effect function. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;186:48–53. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0353-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koob GF., Ahmed SH., Boutrel B., et al Neurobiological mechanisms in the transition from drug use to drug dependence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;27:739–749. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Giros B., Jaber M., Jones SR., Wightman RM., Caron MG. Hyperlocomotion and indifference to cocaine and amphetamine in mice lacking the dopamine transporter. Nature. 1996;379:606–612. doi: 10.1038/379606a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pontieri FE., Tanda G., Di Chiara G. Intravenous cocaine, morphine, and amphetamine preferentially increase extracellular dopamine in the “shell” as compared with the “core” of the rat nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:12304–12308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gonon F. Prolonged and extrasynaptic excitatory action of dopamine mediated by D1 receptors in the rat striatum in vivo. J Neurosci. 1997;17:5972–5978. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-15-05972.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ikemoto S. Involvement of the olfactory tubercle in cocaine reward: intracranial self-administration studies. J Neurosci. 2003;23:9305–9311. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-28-09305.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barak Caine S., Heinrichs SC., Coffin VL., Koob GF. Effects of the dopamine D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 microinjected into the accumbens, amygdala or striatum on cocaine self-administration in the rat. Brain Res. 1995;692:47–56. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00598-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suto N., Wise RA. Satiating effects of cocaine are controlled by dopamine actions in the nucleus accumbens core. J Neurosci. 2011;31:17917–22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1903-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Suto N., Ecke L., Wise R. Control of within-binge cocaine-seeking by dopamine and glutamate in the core of nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology. 2009;205:431–439. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1553-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ito R., Robbins TW., Everitt BJ. Differential control over cocaine-seeking behavior by nucleus accumbens core and shell. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:389–397. doi: 10.1038/nn1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fuchs RA., Evans KA., Parker MC., See RE. Differential involvement of the core and shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens in conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology. 2004;176:459–465. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1895-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Di Chiara G., Imperato A. Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:5274–5278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.14.5274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vanderschuren UMJ., Di Ciano P., Everitt BJ. Involvement of the dorsal striatum in cue-controlled cocaine seeking. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8665–8670. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0925-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zapata A., Minney VL., Shippenberg TS. Shift from goal-directed to habitual cocaine seeking after prolonged experience in rats. J Neurosci. 2010;30:15457–15463. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4072-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jonkman S., Pelloux Y., Everitt BJ. Differential roles of the dorsolateral and midlateral striatum in punished cocaine seeking. J Neurosci. 2012;32:4645–4650. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0348-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kendler KS., Myers J., Prescott CA. Specificity of genetic and environmental risk factors for symptoms of cannabis, cocaine, alcohol, caffeine, and nicotine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:1313–1320. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.11.1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gillespie NA., Kendler KS., Prescott CA., et al Longitudinal modeling of genetic and environmental influences on self-reported availability of psychoactive substances: alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, cocaine and stimulants. Psychol Med. 2007;37:947–959. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707009920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guze SB., Cloninger CR., Martin R., Clayton PJ. Alcoholism as a mental disorder. Compr Psychiatry. 1986;27:501–510. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(86)90054-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Merikangas KR., Stolar M., Stevens DE., et al Familial transmission of substance use disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:973–979. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.11.973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Goodwin DW., Schulsinger F., Knop J., Mednick S., Guze SB. Psychopathology in adopted and nonadopted daughters of alcoholics. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1977;34:1005–1009. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1977.01770210019001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Goodwin DW., Schulsinger F., Moller N., Hermansen L., Winokur G., Guze SB. Drinking problems in adopted and nonadopted sons of alcoholics. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974;31:164–169. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760140022003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Uhl GR., Elmer Gl., Labuda MC., Pickens RW. Genetic influences in drug abuse. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ, eds. Psychopharmacology: the Fourth Generation of Progress. New York, NY: Raven Press. 1995:1793–2783. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Uhl GR., Drgon T., Johnson C., et al “Higher order” addiction molecular genetics: convergent data from genome-wide association in humans and mice. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75:98–111. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ball D. Addiction science and its genetics. Addiction. 2008;103:360–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nader MA., Czoty PW. PET imaging of dopamine D2 receptors in monkey models of cocaine abuse: genetic predisposition versus environmental modulation. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1473–1482. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Impey S. A histone deacetylase regulates addiction. Neuron. 2007;56:415–417. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kumar A., Choi KH., Renthal W., et al Chromatin remodeling is a key mechanism underlying cocaine-induced plasticity in striatum. Neuron. 2005;48:303–314. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hyman SE. Addiction: a disease of learning and memory. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1414–1422. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jones S., Bonci A. Synaptic plasticity and drug addiction. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2005;5:20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2004.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kalivas PW. How do we determine which drug-induced neuroplastic changes are important? Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1440–1441. doi: 10.1038/nn1105-1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kalivas PW., O'Brien C. Drug addiction as a pathology of staged neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:166–180. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kauer JA., Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity and addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:844–858. doi: 10.1038/nrn2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Koob GF., Le Moal M. Plasticity of reward neurocircuitry and the'dark side' of drug addiction. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1442–1444. doi: 10.1038/nn1105-1442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lu L., Koya E., Zhai H., Hope BT., Shaham Y. Role of ERK in cocaine addiction. Trends Neurosci. 2006;29:695–703. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.McClung CA., Ulery PG., Perrotti LI., Zachariou V., Berton O., Nestler EJ. DeltaFosB: a molecular switch for long-term adaptation in the brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2004;132:146–154. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Moghaddam B., Homayoun H. Divergent plasticity of prefrontal cortex networks. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:42–55. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mulholland PJ., Chandler LJ. The thorny side of addiction: adaptive plasticity and dendritic spines. Scientific World Journal. 2007;7:9–21. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Volman SF. Evaluating the functional importance of neuroadaptions in addiction. Scientific World Journal. 2007;7:4–8. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Di Chiara G., Imperato A. Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc. Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:5274–5278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.14.5274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Renthal W., Maze I., Krishnan V., et al Histone deacetylase 5 epigenetically controls behavioral adaptations to chronic emotional stimuli. Neuron. 2007;56:517–529. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen J., Nye HE., Kelz MB., et al Regulation of delta FosB and FosB-like proteins by electroconvulsive seizure and cocaine treatments. Mol Pharmacol. 1995;48:880–889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hope BT., Nye HE., Kelz MB., et al Induction of a long-lasting AP-1 complex composed of altered Fos-like proteins in brain by chronic cocaine and other chronic treatments. Neuron. 1994;13:1235–1244. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Grimm JW., Lu L., Hayashi T., Hope BT., Su TP., Shaham Y. Time-dependent increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor protein levels within the mesolimbic dopamine system after withdrawal from cocaine: implications for incubation of cocaine craving. J Neurosci. 2003;23:742–747. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-03-00742.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Benavides DR., Quinn JJ., Zhong P., et al Cdk5 modulates cocaine reward, motivation, and striatal neuron excitability. J Neurosci. 2007;27:12967–12976. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4061-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Taylor JR., Lynch WJ., Sanchez H., Olausson P., Nestler EJ., Bibb JA. Inhibition of Cdk5 in the nucleus accumbens enhances the locomotor-activating and incentive-motivational effects of cocaine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:4147–4152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610288104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Covington HE. 3rd, Maze I., Sun H., et al A role for repressive histone methylation in cocaine-induced vulnerability to stress. Neuron. 2011;71:656–670. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kennedy PJ., Feng J., Robison AJ., et al Class I HDAC inhibition blocks cocaine-induced plasticity by targeted changes in histone methylation. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:434–440. doi: 10.1038/nn.3354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.LaPlant Q., Vialou V., Covington HE. 3rd, et al Dnmt3a regulates emotional behavior and spine plasticity in the nucleus accumbens. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:1137–1143. doi: 10.1038/nn.2619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Maze I., Covington HE. 3rd, Dietz DM., et al Essential role of the histone methyltransferase G9a in cocaine-induced plasticity. Science. 2010;327:213–216. doi: 10.1126/science.1179438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Maze I., Feng J., Wilkinson MB., Sun H., Shen L., Nestler EJ. Cocaine dynamically regulates heterochromatin and repetitive element unsilencing in nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:3035–3040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015483108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lai EC. microRNAs: runts of the genome assert themselves. Curr Biol. 2003;13:R925–R936. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lai EC. miRNAs: whys and wherefores of miRNA-mediated regulation. Curr Biol. 2005;15:R458–R460. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lim LP., Glasner ME., Yekta S., Burge CB., Bartel DP. Vertebrate microRNA genes. Science. 2003;299:1540. doi: 10.1126/science.1080372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Reinhart BJ., Slack FJ., Basson M., et al The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2000;403:901–906. doi: 10.1038/35002607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lau NC., Lim LP., Weinstein EG., Bartel DP. An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2001;294:858–862. doi: 10.1126/science.1065062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ruby JG., Jan C., Player C., et al Large-scale sequencing reveals 21 URNAs and additional microRNAs and endogenous siRNAs in C. elegans. Cell. 2006;127:1193–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rajagopalan R., Vaucheret H., Trejo J., Bartel DP. A diverse and evolutionary fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes. Dev. 2006;20:3407–3425. doi: 10.1101/gad.1476406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Jones-Rhoades MW., Bartel DP., Bartel B. MicroRNAS and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:19–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Axtell MJ., Bartel DP. Antiquity of microRNAs and their targets in land plants. Plant Cell. 2005;17:1658–1673. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.032185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Krichevsky AM., King KS., Donahue CP., Khrapko K., Kosik KS. A microRNA array reveals extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development. Rna. 2003;9:1274–1281. doi: 10.1261/rna.5980303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Miska EA., Alvarez-Saavedra E., Townsend M., et al Microarray analysis of microRNA expression in the developing mammalian brain. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R68. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-9-r68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Giraldez AJ., Cinalli RM., Glasner ME., et al MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish. Science. 2005;308:833–838. doi: 10.1126/science.1109020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kapsimali M., Kloosterman WP., de Bruijn E., Rosa F., Plasterk RH., Wilson SW. MicroRNAs show a wide diversity of expression profiles in the developing and mature central nervous system. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R173. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bilen J., Liu N., Bonini NM. A new role for microRNA pathways: modulation of degeneration induced by pathogenic human disease proteins. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:2835–2838. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.24.3579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Karres JS., Hilgers V., Carrera I., Treisman J., Cohen SM. The conserved microRNA miR-8 tunes atrophin levels to prevent neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Cell. 2007;131:136–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Makeyev EV., Zhang J., Carrasco MA., Maniatis T. The MicroRNA miR124 promotes neuronal differentiation by triggering brain-specific alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2007;27:435–448. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Schaefer A., O'Carroll D., Tan CL., et al Cerebellar neurodegeneration in the absence of microRNAs. J Ex Med. 2007;204:1553–1558. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kye MJ., Liu T., Levy SF., et al Somatodendritic microRNAs identified by laser capture and multiplex RT-PCR. Rna. 2007;13:1224–1234. doi: 10.1261/rna.480407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kiebler MA., DesGroseillers L. Molecular insights into mRNA transport and local translation in the mammalian nervous system. Neuron. 2000;25:19–28. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80868-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ashraf SI., McLoon AL., Sclarsic SM., Kunes S. Synaptic protein synthesis associated with memory is regulated by the RISC pathway in Drosophila. Cell. 2006;124:191–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Duan R., Jin P. Identification of messenger RNAs and microRNAs associated with fragile X mental retardation protein. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;342:267–276. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-123-1:267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Plante I., Davidovic L., Ouellet DL., et al Dicer-derived MicroRNAs are utilized by the fragile X mental retardation protein for assembly on target RNAs. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2006;2006:643–647. doi: 10.1155/JBB/2006/64347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zalfa F., Bagni C. Another view of the role of FMRP in translational regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:251–252. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4521-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Edbauer D., Neilson JR., Foster KA., et al Regulation of synaptic structure and function by FMRP-associated microRNAs miR-125b and miR-132. Neuron. 2010;65:373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Gong X., Zhang K., Wang Y., et al MicroRNA-130b targets Fmr1 and regulates embryonic neural progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;439:493–500. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.08.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Muddashetty RS., Nalavadi VC., Gross C., et al Reversible inhibition of PSD-95 mRNA translation by miR-125a, FMRP phosphorylation, and mGluR signaling. Mol Cell. 2011;42:673–688. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sudhakaran IP., Hillebrand J., Dervan A., et al FMRP and Ataxin-2 function together in long-term olfactory habituation and neuronal translational control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E99–E108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309543111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Xu XL., Zong R., Li Z., et al FXR1P but not FMRP regulates the levels of mammalian brain-specific microRNA-9 and microRNA-124. J Neurosci. 2011;31:13705–13709. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2827-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ashraf SI., Kunes S. A trace of silence: memory and microRNA at the synapse. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:535–539. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Gao J., Wang WY., Mao YW., et al A novel pathway regulates memory and plasticity via SIRT1 and miR-134. Nature. 2010;466:1105–1109. doi: 10.1038/nature09271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Lin Q., Wei W., Coelho CM., Li X., et al The brain-specific microRNA miR-128b regulates the formation of fear-extinction memory. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:1115–1117. doi: 10.1038/nn.2891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.McNeill E., Van Vactor D. MicroRNAs shape the neuronal landscape. Neuron. 2012;75:363–379. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mellios N., Sugihara H., Castro J., et al miR-132, an experience-dependent microRNA, is essential for visual cortex plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:1240–1242. doi: 10.1038/nn.2909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sim SE., Bakes J., Kaang BK. Neuronal activity-dependent regulation of MicroRNAs. Mol Cell. 2014;37:511–517. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2014.0132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Sosanya NM., Huang PP., Cacheaux LP., et al Degradation of high affinity HuD targets releases Kv1.1 mRNA from miR-129 repression mTORC1. J Cell Biol. 2013;202:53–69. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201212089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Vetere G., Barbato C., Pezzola S., et al Selective inhibition of miR-92 in hippocampal neurons alters contextual fear memory. Hippocampus. In press. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kenny PJ., Voren G., Johnson PM. Dopamine D2 receptors and striatopallidal transmission in addiction and obesity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:535–538. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Schaefer A., Im HI., Veno MT., et al Argonaute 2 in dopamine 2 receptor-expressing neurons regulates cocaine addiction. J Exp Med. 2010;207:1843–1851. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Eipper-Mains JE., Kiraly DD., Palakodeti D., Mains RE., Eipper BA., Graveley BR. microRNA-Seq reveals cocaine-regulated expression of striatal microRNAs. ANA. 2011;17:1529–1543. doi: 10.1261/rna.2775511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Im HI., Kenny PJ. MicroRNAs in neuronal function and dysfunction. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35:325–334. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Jonkman S., Kenny PJ. Molecular, cellular, and structural mechanisms of cocaine addiction: a key role for microRNAs. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:198–211. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Li MD., van der Vaart AD. MicroRNAs in addiction: adaptation's middlemen? Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:1159–1168. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Pietrzykowski AZ. The role of microRNAs in drug addiction: a big lesson from tiny molecules. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2010;91:1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(10)91001-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Rodriguez RE. Morphine and microRNA activity: is there a relation with addiction? Front Genet. 2012;3:223. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Sartor GC., St Laurent G. 3rd, Wahlestedt C. The emerging role of noncoding RNAs in drug addiction. Front Genet. 2012;3:106. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Chandrasekar V., Dreyer JL. microRNAs miR-124, let-7d miR 181a regulate cocaine-induced plasticity. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2009;42:350–362. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Chandrasekar V., Dreyer JL. Regulation of MiR-124, Let-7d, and MiR 181a in the accumbens affects the expression, extinction, and reinstatement of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:1149–1164. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hollander JA., Im H-I., Amelio AL., et al Striatal microRNA controls cocaine intake through CREB signalling. Nature. 2010;466:197–202. doi: 10.1038/nature09202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Vo N., Klein ME., Varlamova O., et al A cAMP-response element binding protein-induced microRNA regulates neuronal morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16426–16431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508448102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Wayman GA., Davare M., Ando H., et al An activity-regulated microRNA controls dendritic plasticity by down-regulating p250GAP. Proc Natl AcadSciUSA. 2008;105:9093–9098. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803072105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Tsang J., Zhu J., van Oudenaarden A. MicroRNA-mediated feedback and feedforward loops are recurrent network motifs in mammals. Molecular. Cell. 2007;26:753–767. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Carlezon WA., Jr Thome J., Olson VG., et al Regulation of cocaine reward by CREB. Science. 1998;282:2272–2275. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Dinieri JA., Nemeth CL., Parsegian A., et al Altered sensitivity to rewarding and aversive drugs in mice with inducible disruption of cAMP response element-binding protein function within the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 2009;29:1855–1859. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5104-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.McClung CA., Nestler EJ. Regulation of gene expression and cocaine reward by CREB and [Delta]FosB. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:1208–1215. doi: 10.1038/nn1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Varga EV., Rubenzik M., Grife V., et al Involvement of Raf-1 in chronic delta-opioid receptor agonist-mediated adenylyl cyclase superactivation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;451:101–102. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)02220-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Bahi A., Dreyer JL. Striatal modulation of BDNF expression using microRNA124a-expressing lentiviral vectors impairs ethanol-induced conditioned-place preference and voluntary alcohol consumption, fur. J Neurosci. 2013;38:2328–2337. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Li J., Li J., LiuX, et al MicroRNA expression profile and functional analysis reveal that miR-382 is a critical novel gene of alcohol addiction. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5:1402–1414. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201201900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Nestler EJ. Review. Transcriptional mechanisms of addiction: role of DeltaFosB. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:3245–3255. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.apocik JD., Barbier E., Flanigan M., et al microRNA-206 in rat medial prefrontal cortex regulates BDNF expression and alcohol drinking. J Neurosci. 2014;34:4581–4588. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0445-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Townley-Tilson WH., Callis TE., Wang D. MicroRNAs 1, 133, and 206: critical factors of skeletal and cardiac muscle development, function, and disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42:1252–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Tian N., Cao Z., Zhang Y. MiR-206 decreases brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Bull. 2014;30:191–197. doi: 10.1007/s12264-013-1419-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Radzikinas K., Aven L., Jiang Z., et al A Shh/miR-206/BDNF cascade coordinates innervation and formation of airway smooth muscle. J Neurosci. 2011;31:15407–15415. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2745-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Miura P., Amirouche A., Clow C., Belanger G., Jasmin BJ. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression is repressed during myogenic differentiation by miR-206. J Neurochem. 2012;120:230–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Lee ST., Chu K., Jung KH., et al miR-206 regulates brain-derived neurotrophic factor in Alzheimer disease model. Ann Neurol. 2012;72:269–277. doi: 10.1002/ana.23588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Autry AE., Monteggia LM. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neuropsychiatry disorders. Pharmacol Rev. 2012;64:238–258. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.005108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Acar M., Becskei A., van Oudenaarden A. Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions. Nature. 2005;435:228–232. doi: 10.1038/nature03524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Amir RE., Van den Veyver IB., Wan M., Tran CQ., Francke U., Zoghbi HY. Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding rnethyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat Genet. 1999;23:185–188. doi: 10.1038/13810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Van Esch H., Bauters M., Ignatius J., et al Duplication of the MECP2 region is a frequent cause of severe mental retardation and progressive neurological symptoms in males. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77:442–53. doi: 10.1086/444549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Nan X., Ng HH., Johnson CA., et al Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature. 1998;393:386–389. doi: 10.1038/30764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Im H-l., Hollander JA., Bali P., Kenny PJ. MeCP2 controls BDNF expression and cocaine intake through homeostatic interactions with microRNA-212. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:1120–1127. doi: 10.1038/nn.2615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES