Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common types of human malignancy worldwide, which is becoming increasingly resistant to traditional drug treatments. Puerarin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may be a useful treatment for liver cancer. The primary aim of the present study was to determine whether combined treatment with 5-FU and puerarin is more effective against the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line, SMMC7721, than treatment with 5-FU or puerarin alone. The growth inhibition of SMMC7721 cells by puerarin or 5-FU alone or in combination was determined by the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, in vitro. Apoptotic morphological features and the percentage of apoptotic cells were detected using Hoechst 33258 staining and an Annexin V/PI apoptosis kit, respectively. In addition, a tumor xenograft model was established in nude mice using SMMC7721 cells. Puerarin and 5-FU alone or in combination were injected into the mice, and the inhibition of tumor growth was evaluated by monitoring tumor volume and weight. Treatment with 6,400 or 640 μM 5-FU resulted in growth inhibition of 95.56±0.81 and 75.91±3.54%, respectively. The combination index values were <1 when the fraction of affected cells was between 0.2555 and 0.7420. Furthermore, the percentage of apoptotic cells was markedly increased in the combined treatment group when compared with that of the individual treatment groups, in vitro and in vivo. Individual treatment with puerarin resulted in a tumor volume inhibition rate (IR) of 70.58% and a tumor weight IR of 46.20%. Treatment with 5-FU was found to decrease the tumor volume by 76.26% and tumor weight by 49.86%. In the combined treatment group, the tumor volume and weight IRs were 93.11 and 75.21%, respectively. A marked increase in the inhibition of tumor growth and the number of apoptotic cells in response to combined treatment with puerarin and 5-FU was identified with no observed liver or renal toxicity. These results suggest that puerarin and 5-FU exhibit a synergistic treatment effect on the HCC SMMC7721 cell line.
Keywords: chemotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, hepatocellular carcinoma, puerarin
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common type of human malignancy worldwide (1) and one of the most common types of malignant tumor in China. HCC is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (2,3) and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in China. The annual incidence of HCC is increasing (4,5) and, therefore, it presents a significant threat to human health. Chemotherapy may be used to treat HCC; however, traditional systemic chemotherapy exhibits a low curative rate for liver cancer due to its high number of toxic effects, and is therefore not widely accepted. Recently, treatments combining several chemotherapeutic or chemopreventive agents have been used as they not only enhance the treatment effect but also reduce drug toxicity.
The compound 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs for liver, colorectal and gastric cancers in clinical practice (6). In addition, 5-FU is commonly used in advanced-stage HCC chemotherapy, alone or in combination with other drugs. Resistance to 5-FU is a key cause of chemotherapy failure in advanced-stage HCC (7) and, therefore, it is important to identify novel chemotherapeutic agents with high therapeutic efficacy. The combination of novel chemotherapeutic agents with existing drugs may enhance the efficacy of liver cancer therapy.
Radix puerariae (the root of the kudzu plant, Pueraria lobata) is one of the most popular traditional Chinese medicines. Puerarin (daidzein-8-C-glucoside) and daidzein (daidzein-7-O-glucoside) are the major isoflavones of the kudzu root (8). Previous studies have suggested that puerarin may exhibit anticarcinogenic effects (9–16). In addition, one study has suggested that puerarin may act as a sensitizer to enhance the inhibitory effect of Bulbophyllum extract on HCC proliferation (17).
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of the combined treatment with puerarin and 5-FU on HCC in vitro and in vivo.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Puerarin (P5555) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) with a purity of 98%, as assessed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. The puerarin was stored as a 100-mM stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide at −20°C and diluted with serum-free culture medium for use in experiments. The compound 5-FU was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (F6627) and diluted to various concentrations in serum-free culture medium. The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was obtained from Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc. (Kumamato, Japan).
The Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) kit was obtained from Beijing MultiSciences Biotech Co., Ltd (Beijing, China) and the Hoechst staining kit was obtained from the Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (Shanghai, China).
Cell line and cell culture
The HCC SMMC7721 cell line was obtained from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (Wuhan, China). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco-BRL), 50 mg/ml streptomycin (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), 50 IU/ml penicillin (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), and 2 mM glutamine (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C.
Cell growth inhibition studies
The inhibitory effect of puerarin on SMMC7721 cell growth in vitro was determined using CCK-8 dye, which is only absorbed by living cells. Briefly, 5,000 cells/well were seeded into 96-well microtiter plates. Following exposure to puerarin (400, 800, 1,600, 3,200 or 6,400 μM), 5-FU (40, 80, 160, 320 or 640 μM) or puerarin and 5-FU (400:40; 800:80; 1600:60; 3200:320 μM, respectively) for 48 h, 10 μl CCK-8 solution was added to each well, and the plates were incubated for an additional 2 h (at 37°C with 5% CO2). The optical density was then determined at a wavelength of 450 nm using a microplate reader (iMark; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the results were presented as the inhibition rate (IR), which was calculated using the following formula: IR (%) = [(A-B)/A] × 100, where A and B are the absorbance of the control and sample groups following 48 h of incubation, respectively.
Evaluation of the combined effects of puerarin and 5-FU
The following equation (18,19) was used to evaluate the nature of the interaction between puerarin and 5-FU: D = Dm[fa/(1 - fa)]1/m, where D is the dose, Dm is the dose required to produce the median effect (analogous to the IC50), fa is the fraction of the system affected by D, and m is a Hill-type coefficient signifying the sigmoidicity of the dose-effect curve. The combination index (CI) values were obtained using Biosoft CalcuSyn software (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK) written in BASIC for automatic graphing of the CI with respect to fa, to determine whether the two drugs were non-exclusive. Synergism was indicated by a CI value of <1, summation by a CI value equal to 1 and antagonism by a CI value of >1.
Cell apoptosis assay
Apoptotic cells were detected by Hoechst 33258 staining as follows. Following exposure to puerarin (1,600 μM), 5-FU (160 μM) or puerarin and 5-FU for 48 h, the SMMC7721 cells were incubated with 20 μM Hoechst 33258 (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and examined under a fluorescence microscope (BX53F; Olympus, Tokoyo, Japan). The apoptotic cells were identified by Hoechst 33258 staining of the condensed chromatin and nuclear fragments. A total of 10 random fields were counted for each sample.
Annexin V/PI staining
An Annexin V/PI apoptosis kit was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions to quantify the percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis. Firstly, SMMC7721 cells were incubated for 48 h with puerarin (1,600 μM) or 5-FU (160 μM) alone or in combination. Next, the cells were washed twice with cold PBS and resuspended in binding buffer at a concentration of 1×106 cells/μl. Then, 5 μl of Annexin V-FITC and 10 μl PI were added, and the cells were incubated for 5 min at room temperature in the dark. Following incubation, 200 μl of binding buffer was added and the cells were analyzed immediately by flow cytometry (FACSAriaIII; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The flow cytometry analysis was performed using the Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences). The Annexin V+/PI− cells were identified as apoptotic cells, and the Annexin V−/PI+ cells were identified as necrotic cells (20). The entire procedure was repeated three times for each sample.
Xenograft tumor model
All animal procedures, which complied with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (21), were approved by the Committee on Animal Experimentation of Wuhan University (Wuhan, China). Four- to six-week-old male BALB/c-nu/nu nude mice were purchased from the Center for Experimental Animals of Wuhan University (Wuhan, China). All mice weighed 16–18 g and were bred in autoclaved, filter-top, microisolator cages, which were kept in an isolator unit with filtered air. The mice had access to water and food ad libitum. The human HCC SMMC7721 cell line used for inoculation was cultured as previously described. The mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 1×107 SMMC7721 cells per mouse and the tumor sizes were measured using micrometer calipers. The mice were randomly divided into the following four groups, with six mice per group: Saline tumor control, puerarin (50 mg/kg/day), 5-FU (12 mg/kg/day), and puerarin (50 mg/kg/day) in combination with 5-FU (12 mg/kg/day).
Measuring tumor volume and weight
The tumor volume (TV) was calculated using the following formula: TV (mm3) = d2x(D/2), where d and D are the shortest and longest diameters, respectively. The tumor size was measured with calipers every three days. The mice were sacrificed by extracting the eyeball at the end of four weeks and the tumor xenografts were removed, weighed and measured for additional analyses.
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay
Sections of each tumor xenograft were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, dehydrated with an ethanol gradient, embedded in paraffin, dewaxed and rehydrated with a decreasing ethanol gradient (100, 95, 90, 80 and 70%), according to standard instructions. An in situ apoptosis detection kit (Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Branchburg, NJ, USA) was used to detect apoptosis. All procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The specimens were incubated with proteinase K [15 μg/ml in 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5)] for 20 min at room temperature after being dewaxed and rehydrated. Next, the specimens were rinsed with 3% H2O2, and incubated with equilibration buffer and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The specimens were then incubated with an anti-digoxigenin-peroxidase conjugate. Finally, the 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate was added to react with the peroxidase and the specimens were counterstained with hematoxylin, mounted and analyzed using a light microscope (BX53F).
Evaluation of side effects
Following the completion of the study, blood was collected from the nude mice by cardiac puncture using heparin-rinsed 5-ml syringes and 22-gauge needles. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (Cr) levels were measured to evaluate liver and renal injury using an Olympus AU5400 Immuno Analyzer (Olympus). All mice were sacrificed and dissected following the completion of the study. In addition, metastasis, hemorrhage and liver and kidney morphology were assessed by an observer blinded to the treatment groups. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Renmin Hospital at Wuhan University.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The means of the different groups were compared using non-parametric analysis (Mann-Whitney rank-sum test) and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Effect of single drug exposure on the growth of the HCC SMMC7721 cell line
The inhibition of SMMC7721 proliferation by puerarin and 5-FU was assessed following 48 h of drug exposure and 24 h of culture in drug-free medium. After 48 h of treatment, in vitro SMMC7721 cell growth was significantly inhibited in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.01; Fig. 1). The mean ± SD rate of inhibition by puerarin was 19.51±0.72% at a concentration of 400 μM, and 95.56±0.81% at a concentration of 6,400 μM. The rate of growth inhibition by 5-FU at 40 μM was 38.83±0.63%, while the rate was 75.91±3.54% at 640 μM.
Combined effect of puerarin and 5-FU on SMMC7721 cell growth
The SMMC7721 cells were exposed to the two drugs in combination at a fixed molar ratio (puerarin to 5-FU, 10:1) for 48 h. The effect on cell proliferation was then assessed by CCK-8 assay and the rate of growth inhibition was calculated according to the method used by Chou and Talalay (18,19). All experiments were repeated in triplicate. The CI values were <1 when the fraction of affected cells was between 0.2555 and 0.7420 (Fig. 2).
Apoptosis induced by puerarin and 5-FU
Morphological changes in the SMMC7721 cells indicating apoptosis were detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. The classical characteristics of apoptotic cells are nuclear fragmentation and chromatin condensation. Distinct chromatin condensation and nuclear fragmentation were identified in the treatment groups, while the nuclei of the control cells stained a weak homogeneous blue (Fig. 3).
An Annexin V/PI apoptosis kit was used to quantify the percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis. The proportion of Annexin V-positive/PI-negative cells increased progressively over 48 h in the SMMC7721 cells incubated with low concentrations of puerarin (1,600 μM) and 5-FU (160 μM) (Fig. 4). The cells treated with puerarin or 5-FU demonstrated a significantly higher rate of apoptosis when compared with that of the control group (P<0.01; Fig. 4), and the rate of apoptosis was significantly higher in the combined treatment group when compared with that of the individual treatment groups (P<0.01; Fig. 4).
Effect of puerarin and 5-FU on tumor development in vivo Xenograft tumor model and inhibition of SMMC7721 tumor growth
The effect of puerarin and 5-FU on the growth of primary tumor xenografts was investigated in nude mice. None of the mice succumbed to the disease during the study, and 18 mice successfully grew tumor xenografts. The mice were randomly divided into three groups as previously described, and a saline-only control group was included. No significant differences were identified in the tumor sizes among the four groups at the start of treatment. The mice were treated with puerarin, 5-FU, puerarin and 5-FU in combination, or saline only. Puerarin or 5-FU alone, as well as the combined treatment with the two drugs, significantly inhibited the SMMC7721 tumor growth rate (as determined by tumor volume and weight) when compared with that of the control group (P<0.05; Tables I and II).
Table I.
Group | n | Volume, mm3 (mean±SD) | Inhibition rate,% |
---|---|---|---|
Puerarin | 6 | 134.89±45.71a,b | 70.58 |
5-FU | 6 | 108.83±12.93a,b | 76.26 |
Puerarin + 5-FU | 6 | 31.58±8.83b | 93.11 |
Control | 6 | 458.48±55.51 |
Data are presented as inhibition rate (%) = (1 - mean of tumor volume from the experimental group/mean of tumor volume for the control) ×100 (n=6).
P<0.05, vs. puerarin and 5-FU groups;
P<0.05, vs. the control group.
5-FU, 5-fluorouracil.
Table II.
Group | n | Weight, g (mean±SD) | Inhibition rate,% |
---|---|---|---|
Puerarin | 6 | 0.318±0.047)a,b | 46.20 |
5-FU | 6 | 0.297±0.068)a,b | 49.86 |
Puerarin + 5-FU | 6 | 0.147±0.029)b | 75.21 |
Control | 6 | 0.592±0.066) |
Data are presented as inhibition rate (%) = (1 - mean of tumor weight of tests/mean of tumor weight of control) ×100 (n=6).
P<0.05, vs. puerarin + 5-FU group;
P<0.05, vs. the control group.
5-FU, 5-fluorouracil.
Detection of apoptotic cells in xenograft tumor tissue
The TUNEL assay demonstrated that significant cell death had occurred in the tumor masses from the treatment groups when compared with that of the saline-only control group (P<0.01; Fig. 5); however, the degree of apoptosis differed in each group. The tumors from the combined treatment group demonstrated a significantly increased level of apoptosis when compared with that of the puerarin and 5-FU groups (P<0.01; Fig. 5).
Evaluation of side effects
At the end of the study, blood was collected from the mice by cardiac puncture using heparin-rinsed 5-ml syringes and 22-gauge needles. The ALT, AST, BUN and Cr levels were measured to evaluate liver and renal injury (22). Serum ALT, AST, BUN and Cr levels were not identified to be significantly elevated in the treated mice when compared with those of the control group (P>0.05, Table III), and no significant difference in the levels of these biomarkers was identified between the puerarin, 5-FU and combined treatment groups (P>0.05, Table III). All mice were sacrificed and dissected following completion of the study. In addition, no liver or kidney injury, obvious metastasis or hemorrhage was observed. Furthermore, no significant difference was identified in liver or kidney weight between the treated groups and the control group, and no evident lesions were observed by histopathological examination.
Table III.
Group | n | ALT, U/l (mean±SD) | AST, U/l) (mean±SD) | Urea, μmol/l) (mean±SD) | Cr, μmol/l) (mean±SD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Puerarin | 6 | 46.17±6.55 | 143.33±28.93 | 7.98±2.15 | 16.64±5.61 |
5-FU | 6 | 46.00±3.16 | 144.83±21.27 | 7.96±0.96 | 15.86±5.29 |
Puerarin + 5-FU | 6 | 45.33±8.16 | 146.67±25.84 | 8.29±1.59 | 16.24±3.54 |
Tumor control | 6 | 46.33±4.08 | 145.33±14.85 | 8.05±0.51 | 16.57±4.54 |
Normal control | 6 | 46.17±4.92 | 145.00±6.78 | 7.91±1.03 | 16.85±5.74 |
The groups were treated with puerarin (50 mg/kg/day), 5-FU (12 mg/kg/day), puerarin (50 mg/kg/day) and 5-FU (12 mg/kg/day), tumor control (an equal volume of saline) or normal control (no treatment). No differences in serum ALT, AST, urea or Cr were identified among the groups (P>0.05). 5-Fu, 5-fluorouracil; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; Cr, serum creatinine.
Discussion
HCC is a major public health threat that is responsible for ~600,000 mortalities each year (2,3). Recently, more effective treatments and earlier diagnosis have increased the survival rate. However, the efficacy of surgical techniques and radiotherapy is limited by the possibility of metastasis. Therefore, chemotherapy is key for improving survival in HCC patients.
5-FU is an important chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of hepatogastroenteric tumors (23). 5-FU is commonly used to treat HCC, alone or in combination with other agents. Recently, more traditional medicines have been used to prevent or treat tumors, particularly in China. Puerarin has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for many years. Certain studies have suggested that puerarin exhibits anticancer activity and significant antiproliferative and apoptotic effects (9–16).
In the present study, the synergistic effect of puerarin and 5-FU treatment for hepatic carcinoma was investigated in vitro and in vivo. Puerarin or 5-FU alone were found to significantly inhibit the proliferation of SMMC7721 cells in a dose-dependent manner (puerarin, 400–6,400 μM; 5-FU, 40–640 μM). Furthermore, combined treatment with puerarin and 5-FU inhibited SMMC7721 cell proliferation at specific concentrations, when the fraction of affected cells was between 0.2555 and 0.7420. The mechanism of this synergistic effect was further investigated and the results showed that puerarin or 5-FU alone induced significant apoptosis when compared with that of the control group. In addition, the combined treatment induced a greater degree of apoptosis than puerarin or 5-FU alone in vitro and in vivo. This suggested that combined treatment with puerarin and 5-FU is more effective in inhibiting the growth of human HCC SMMC7721 cells.
A previous study suggested that puerarin may act as a sensitizer to enhance the inhibition of hepatic carcinoma cell proliferation by other chemotherapeutic agents (17). The results of the present study indicated that puerarin enhances the efficacy of 5-FU in HCC treatment in vitro and in vivo. Multiple factors have been implicated in the increased resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, including the reduction of intracellular drug accumulation and DNA damage repair by the modulation of proliferative or antiapoptotic proteins (24). Puerarin most likely enhances HCC sensitivity to 5-FU by inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis.
Wang et al (11) showed that administration of puerarin was able to reverse multidrug resistance in a nude mouse model of human gastric carcinoma, and that decreased expression of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein may be responsible for this effect. Crude pueraria extract and purified puerarin induce apoptosis, which may correlate with the observed inhibition of the cell cycle in the G0/G1 phase, as well as increased Bax expression and decreased Bcl-2 expression (13). In addition, Tran et al (15) revealed that puerarin downregulates multidrug resistance protein 1 expression in MCF-7/ADR cells via the upregulation of AMPK, which is dependent on nuclear factor-κ-β and cAMP-responsive element transcriptional activity. Further study is required to determine the molecular mechanism by which combined treatment with puerarin and 5-FU inhibits the growth of HCC. In conclusion, puerarin combined with 5-FU exhibited a significantly greater anti-liver cancer effect than that of puerarin or 5-FU treatment alone, and thus combined therapy may present a novel therapeutic regimen for HCC.
Acknowledgements
This study was performed at the Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease with the assistance of Mr. Hong Xia. The study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (grant no. 2012302020208).
References
- 1.Bosch FX, Ribes J, Díaz M, Cléries R. Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(Suppl 1):S5–S16. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roberts LR. Sorafenib in liver cancer - just the beginning. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:420–422. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0802241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hall AJ, Wild CP. Liver cancer in low and middle income countries. BMJ. 2003;326:994–995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7397.994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2557–2576. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Diasio RB, Johnson MR. The role of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in cancer chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil. Pharmacology. 2000;61:199–203. doi: 10.1159/000028401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang H, Jiang H, Zhou M, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor vIII enhances tumorigenicity and resistance to 5-fluorouracil in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2009;279:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lin YJ, Hou YC, Lin CH, Hsu YA, Sheu JJ, Lai CH, Chen BH, Lee Chao PD, Wan L, Tsai FJ. Puerariae radix isoflavones and their metabolites inhibit growth and induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;378:683–688. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yanagihara K, Ito A, Toge T, Numoto M. Antiproliferative effects of isoflavones on human cancer cell lines established from the gastrointestinal tract. Cancer Res. 1993;53:5815–5821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jun M, Hong J, Jeong WS, Ho CT. Suppression of arachidonic acid metabolism and nitric oxide formation by kudzu isoflavones in murine macrophages. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2005;49:1154–1159. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200500103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Li, Wei PK, Qin ZF, Xu YP, Lou LG, Li YL, He Ji. Experimental study on puerarin injection reverse multidrug resistance of nude mice of human gastric carcinoma constructed using orthotopic transplantation. J Chendu Univ Tradit Chin Med. 1:42–44. discussion 46, 2005 (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yu Z, Li W. Induction of apoptosis by puerarin in colon cancer HT-29 cells. Cancer Lett. 2006;238:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Han P, Pei LY, Li J, Zhang L, Zhang HQ, Xu D. Effect and mechanism of pueraria crude extract puerarin on lung cancer H446 cell proliferation. Shandong Med J. 2008;48:7–9. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hien TT, Kim HG, Han EH, Kang KW, Jeong HG. Molecular mechanism of suppression of MDR1 by puerarin from Pueraria lobata via NF-kappaB pathway and cAMP-responsive element transcriptional activity-dependent up-regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase in breast cancer MCF-7/adr cells. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010;54:918–928. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200900146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li XR, Zhang QQ, Cui YH, Hua QL, Yang T. The growth influence on human esophageal cancer cells EC9706 induced by puerari. XIan Dai Zhang Liu Yi Xue. 2010;10:1922–1924. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jing XF, Li H, Li XM. Effect of puerarin on AQP 1 mRNA expression level in esophageal cancer cell line TE-1 and ECA109. Xinjiang J Med Univ. 2011;34:258–260. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tan GS, Sun L, Cao JG. Cytotoxic constituents from Bulbuphyllum inconsipicum. You Ji Hua Xue. 2006;3:372–374. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chou TC, Talalay P. Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1984;22:27–55. doi: 10.1016/0065-2571(84)90007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chou TC, Motzer RJ, Tong Y, Bosl GJ. Computerized quantitation of synergism and antagonism of taxol, topotecan, and cisplatin against human teratocarcinoma cell growth: a rational approach to clinical protocol design. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:1517–1524. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.20.1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim BR, Shim JW, Sung DK, et al. Granulocyte stimulating factor attenuates hypoxic-ischemic brain injury by inhibiting apoptosis in neonatal rats. Yonsei Med J. 2008;49:836–842. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.5.836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th edition. National Academies Press; Washington (DC): 2011. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Awad ME, Abdel-Rahman MS, Hassan SA. Acrylamide toxicity in isolated rat hepatocytes. Toxicol In Vitro. 1998;12:699–704. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(98)00051-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang XW, Tang ZY, Lawrence TS, Zhang M. 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea enhance adenovirus-mediated transgene expression in colon and hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005;131:184–190. doi: 10.1007/s00432-004-0608-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Siddik ZH. Cisplatin: mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22:7265–7279. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]