Abstract
We report Ir-catalyzed, regio- and enantioselective allylic substitution reactions of unstabilized silyl dienolates derived from dioxinones. Asymmetric allylic substitution of a variety of allylic trichloroethyl carbonates with these silyl dienolates gave γ-allylated products selectively in 60–84% yield and 90–98% ee.
Keywords: Ir-catalyzed asymmetric allylic substitution, Silyl dienolates, Dioxinones, γ-Selective asymmetric alkylation
The alkylation of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds (e.g. A) is a classic reaction in organic chemistry. Because the α-position contains the most acidic proton, electrophiles add to this site in the presence of a base to give product B. This fundamental reactivity has been translated to one of the most commonly studied reactions of organometallic catalysis for organic synthesis – asymmetric allylic substitution of soft, stabilized, anionic carbon nucleophiles.1,2
Alkylations of β-keto esters D to form the isomeric γ-alkylated products E are also classic reactions in organic chemistry.3 These reactions occur in the presence of a base that is strong enough to doubly deprotonate the dicarbonyl compounds; electrophiles then add to the most nucleophilic γ-position with high regioselectivity. Despite the value of the γ-alkylation reaction, catalytic asymmetric allylations of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds D at the γ-position have not been reported. The products F in Figure 1 of such allylations are highly versatile synthetic intermediates 4 because they contain three functional groups: an alkene, an ester, and a ketone carbonyl group.
Figure 1.
Ir-catalyzed Regio- and Enantioselective Allylic Substitution with Silyl Dienolates
Silyl dienolates (2) are synthetically equivalent to β-keto ester dianions.5a–c After the formation of a new carbon-carbon bond at the γ-position, the dioxinone moiety in the product (e.g. 3) can be induced to extrude acetone to generate an acyl ketene intermediate. This intermediate can then be trapped with alcohols to give β-keto esters. As shown by Sato, Carreira and Evans, silyl dienolates 2 undergo enantioselective aldol reactions with aldehydes to provide γ-addition products with high regioselectivity;5d–h however, these reagents have not undergone catalytic enantioselective reactions with alkyl or allyl electrophiles.
Here, were port Ir-catalyzed enantioselective allylic substitution reactions 6–9 of silyl dienolates 2 derived from dioxinones with trichloroethyl (Troc) allylic carbonates that occur in good yields with high γ-selectivities, enantioselectivities, and branched-to-linear selectivities (Figure 1). This reaction sets the stereogenic center at the electrophilic carbon atom and is the equivalent of γ-selective, asymmetric alkylations of β-keto esters; the dioxinone moiety in these products can be transformed to a variety of functional groups, while preserving the enantiomeric excess of the product. The key to achieving highly enantioselective and γ-selective alkylations is the combination of a dioxinone as an equivalent of the β-keto ester, a Troc ester of the allylic alcohol as the electrophile, and a chiral, nonracemic phosphoramidite ligand on iridium.
We began our studies on the allylic substitution reaction with silyl dienolate 2a under the conditions we have developed for the asymmetric allylation with α,β-unsaturated ketones.9i Although Mayr and co-workers have determined that the π-nucleophilicity at the α-position of dienolates 2 is much weaker than that at the γ-position,10 there are cases in which the nucleophilic addition occurred at the α position selectively.11 Therefore, to identify an appropriate allylic electrophile for the reaction, several cinnamyl alcohol derivatives were synthesized and asymmetric allylic substitution reactions of these derivatives with dienolate 2a were examined.
As shown in Table 1, treatment of the cinnamyl acetate (1 equiv) and silyl dienolate 2a (2 equiv) with 2 mol % [Ir(cod)Cl]2 and 4 mol % (Sa,Sc,Sc)-L in the presence of KF(1 equiv) and 18-crown-6 (1 equiv) at 50 °C for 24 h provided a 2:1 mixture of γ-substituted product 3a and α-substituted product 4a in 53% and 28% yield, respectively (entry 1, Table 1). When the cinnamyl acetate was replaced with the cinnamyl benzoate, a 1:1 mixture of 3a (36% yield) and 4a was obtained (entry 2, Table 1). Because prolonged heating (24 h) was required for the full conversion of these cinnamyl esters, further investigation of the reaction was conducted with more reactive cinnamyl phosphates and carbonates as the electrophile. When the ethyl cinnamyl phosphate was employed in the reaction, the consumption of the starting phosphate was complete in 12 h at 50 °C. But no improvement of the regioselectivity was achieved (entry 3, Table 1). The allylation reaction of the t-butyl cinnamyl carbonate with 2a also gave a 1:1 mixture of 3a (41% yield) and 4a (entry 4, Table 1). However, when the methyl cinnamyl carbonate was utilized, a 6:1 mixture of 3a and 4a was obtained with 3a as the major isomer in 62% yield and 96% ee (entry 5, Table 1). Finally, the allylic substitution of the trichloroethyl cinnamyl carbonate with silyl dienolate 2a provided a 10:1 mixture of 3a and 4a (entry 6, Table 1). γ-Allylated product 3a was obtained in 74% yield and 97% ee after purification.
Table 1.
Evaluation of the Allylic Electrophile for the Ir-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Substitution with Silyl Dienolate 2a.a
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | LG | γ:α (3a:4a)b | yield (3a)c | % ee (3a)d |
| 1 | OCOMee | 2:1 | 53% | N.D. |
| 2 | OCOPhe | 1:1 | 36% | N.D. |
| 3 | OP(O)(OEt)2 | 1:1 | 38% | N.D. |
| 4 | OCO2t-Bu | 1:1 | 41% | N.D. |
| 5 | OCO2Me | 6:1 | 62% | 96% |
| 6 | OCO2CH2CCl3 | 10:1 | 74% | 97% |
Reaction conditions: cinnamyl ester (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), silyl dienolate 2a (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), [Ir(cod)Cl]2 (2 mol %), (Sa,Sc,Sc)-L (4 mol %), KF (1.0 equiv), 18-crown-6 (1.0 equiv), THF (0.4 mL), 50 °C, 12 h.
Ratios of γ to α-substitution (3a:4a) were determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixtures.
Yields of isolated products were listed.
The ee was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. N.D. = Not determined.
Reactions were carried out at 50 °C for 24 h.
Table 2 summarizes the scope of allylic carbonate 1 that undergoes the asymmetricallylation with silyl dienolate 2a under the developed conditions. In general, allylic substitution of a variety of substituted cinnamyl carbonates with 2a gave the allylation products 3a–i in good yields with high enantioselectivities and γ–selectivities, although in cases of 3d and 3f, moderate γ/α–selectivities were observed. Alkenyl- and alkyl-substituted allylic carbonates also reacted to provide the allylated products 3j–k in 63–69% yield with 9–12:1 γ–selectivity. Allylation of the allylic carbonate containing a heterocyclic indolyl group gave product 3l in 71% yield with excellent γ–selectivity. In all cases, the allylated products were obtained with ≥90% ee and >20:1 branched-to-linear selectivities.
Table 2.
Scope of the Ir-catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Substitution of Trichloroethyl Allylic Carbonates 1 with Silyl Dienolate 2a.a–e
|
Reaction conditions: allylic carbonate 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), silyl dienolate 2a (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), [Ir(cod)Cl]2 (2 mol%), (Sa,Sc,Sc)-L (4 mol%), KF (1.0 equiv), 18-crown-6 (1.0 equiv), THF (0.4 mL), 50 °C, 12 h.
The ee was determined by chiral HPLC analysis.
Ratios of γ to α-substitution were determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixtures.
Yields of isolated products were listed (the average of at least two runs).
OTroc: OCO2CH2CCl3.
Allylic substitution reactions with silyl dienolate 2b were examined next. With a methyl substituent at the α-position in 2b, we anticipated that the asymmetric allylation of allylic esters with 2b should proceed with high γ-selectivity. Indeed, when the reaction was performed with the cinnamyl acetate and silyl dienolate 2b under standard conditions, γ–substituted product 5a was obtained in 60% yield with >20:1 γ–selectivity. However, a significant amount of linear product 6a (21%) was also isolated (entry 1, Table 3). Because high branched-to-linear selectivities (>20:1) were observed in the allylic substitution reactions with silyl dienolate 2a (Tables 1 and 2), we expected that reactions with dienolate 2b should proceed with comparable b/l selectivities. The unexpected low branched-to-linear selectivity presumably resulted from the steric interaction because nucleophile 2b is sterically more hindered than 2a.
Table 3.
Evaluation of the Allylic Electrophile for the Ir-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Substitution with Dienolate 2b.a
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | LG | b:l (5a:6a)b | yield (5a)c | % ee (5a)d |
| 1 | OCOMee | 2:5:1 | 60% | N.D. |
| 2 | OCOPhe | 2:1 | 54% | N.D. |
| 3 | OP(O)(OEt)2 | 1:1 | 41% | N.D. |
| 4 | OCO2t-Bu | 2:5:1 | 56% | N.D. |
| 5 | OCO2Me | 4:1 | 67% | N.D. |
| 6 | OCO2CH2CCl3 | 15:1 | 81% | 90% |
Reaction conditions: cinnamyl ester (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), silyl dienolate 2b (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), [Ir(cod)Cl]2 (2 mol%), (Sa,Sc,Sc)-L (4 mol%), KF (1.0 equiv), 18-crown-6 (1.0 equiv), THF (0.4 mL), 50 °C, 12 h.
Branched to linear ratios (5a:6a) were determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixtures.
Yields of isolated products were listed.
The ee was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. N.D. = Not determined.
Reactions were carried out at 50 °C for 24 h.
To address the low branched-to-linear selectivity issue, allylation reactions of a variety of cinnamyl alcohol derivatives with silyl dienolate 2b were explored. The reaction of the cinnamyl benzoate with 2b only gave a 2:1 mixture of 5a (54% yield) and 6a (entry 2, Table 3). The branched-to-linear selectivity decreased to 1:1 in the reaction of the ethyl cinnamyl phosphate with 2b (entry 3, Table 3). The reaction of the t-butyl cinnamyl carbonate with 2b provided a 2.5:1 mixture of 5a (56% yield) and 6a (entry 4, Table 3). The b/l selectivity was improved to 4:1 when the methyl cinnamyl carbonate was utilized (entry 5, Table 1). Finally, with the trichloroethyl cinnamyl carbonate, again, as the electrophile, the allylic substitution with 2b provided 5a in 81% yield, 90% ee and a 15:1 branched to linear selectivity (entry 6, Table 3).
Table 4 summarizes the results of the asymmetric allylation of silyl dienolate 2b with allylic carbonates 1. A wide range of allylic troc ester sreadily participated in the reaction to give allylated products in good yields with high enantioselectivities and branched-to-linear selectivities. Allylation of 2b with substituted cinnamyl carbonates afforded products 5a–g in 66–81% yield with 90–98% ee and 12–16:1 branched-to-linear product ratios. Reactions of alkenyl- and alkyl-substituted allylic carbonates gave products 5h–i in 60–78% yields with 90–92% ee and 18–20:1 branched selectivities. The allylic carbonate with an indolyl group also reacted to provide product 5j in 84% yield with 90% ee and an excellent branched selectivity. In all cases, detectable amounts of α-allylated products were not formed from these reactions. The absolute configuration of allylation product 5j was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction.
Table 4.
Scope of the Ir-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Substitution of Trichloroethyl Allylic Carbonates 1 with Silyl Dienolate 2b.
|
Reaction conditions: allylic carbonate 1 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), silyl dienolate 2b (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), [Ir(cod)Cl]2 (2 mol%), (Sa,Sc,Sc)-L (4 mol%), KF (1.0 equiv), 18-crown-6 (1.0 equiv), THF (0.4 mL), 50 °C, 12 h.
The ee was determined by chiral HPLC analysis.
Branched to linear ratios (b:l) were determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixtures.
Yields of isolated products were listed (the average of at least two runs).
OTroc: OCO2CH2CCl3.
A series of experiments evaluating the influence of the ligand and leaving group on the regioselectivity of the reaction is shown in Scheme 1. No allylation reaction of cinnamyl carbonate 1a with silyl dienolate 2a or 2b was observed in the absence of [Ir(cod)Cl]2 and (Sa,Sc,Sc)-L (panel a, Scheme 1). However, [Ir(cod)Cl]2 does catalyze the allylic substitution of 1a with dienolate 2a or 2b without the added phosphoramidite ligand. As shown in panel b of Scheme 1, the allylation of carbonate 1a with silyl dienolate 2a at 50 °C for 12 h gave a 2:1 mixture (±)-3a and 4a in 55% combined yield in the presence of 2 mol % [Ir(cod)Cl]2, KF (1 equiv) and 18-crown-6 (1 equiv). Under the identical reaction conditions, the reaction of 1a with 2b gave a 1:1 mixture of (±)-5a and 6a. However, the same reactions conducted with the catalyst generated from [Ir(cod) Cl2 and the phosphoramidite ligand (Sa,Sc,Sc)-L occurred with much higher regioselectivity (in the case of 2a) and branched-to-linear selectivity (in the case of 2b) (panel c, Scheme 1). These data show that the identity of the leaving group of the allylic electrophile alone does not control the site selectivities of these reactions. Instead, the combination of the phosphoramidite ligand L and the leaving group of the allylic electrophile is crucial to obtaining high regioselectivity at the nucleophiles and high branched to linear selectivity at the electrophile.
Scheme 1.
Comparison of the Results of Control Experiments
The dioxinone moiety is a useful precursor to a variety of functional groups.12 To demonstrate the synthetic utility of our asymmetric allylations of dioxinones, a number of transformations of compound 3a were conducted. As illustrated in Scheme 2, treatment of 3a with K2CO3 and MeOH at ambient temperature gave β-keto ester 7 in 95% yield. The reaction of 3a with butanol at 120 °C for 2 h gave butyl ester 8 in 78% yield. Likewise, treatment of 3a with benzyl amine under the same reaction conditions produced β-keto amide 9 in 76% yield.
Scheme 2.

Derivatization of 3a: (a) K2CO3, MeOH, rt, 95%. (b) BuOH, toluene, 120 °C, 2 h, 78%. (c) BnNH2, toluene, 120 °C, 2 h, 76%. (d) i, N-Benzyl-glycine ethyl ester, toluene, 130 °C, ii, KOt-Bu, THF, rt, 71% over two steps. (e) phenyl isocyanate, 130 °C, 4 h, 78%.
In addition to serving as a masked β-keto ester, the dioxinone moiety in 3a can be utilized for the synthesis of heterocycles, such as tetramic acids. These heterocyclic compounds are important pharmacophores in agrochemicals as well as pharmaceutical agents.13 Treatment of 3a with N-benzyl-glycine ethyl ester at 130 °C for 2 h provided the corresponding amide, which underwent subsequent Dieckmann cyclization under basic conditions to give tetramic acid 10 in 71% yield (two steps). The reaction of compound 3a with phenyl isocyanate at 130 °C afforded 1,3-oxazin-2,4-dione 11 in 78% yield.
In conclusion, we have developed an Ir-catalyzed γ-selective asymmetric allylation of silyl dienolates derived from dioxinones. By utilizing the silyl dienolate as the synthetic equivalent of the β-keto ester dianion, the inherent α-selectivity of β-keto esters was inverted to the γ-selectivity. Under the developed reaction conditions, asymmetric allylic substitution of a variety of allylic trichloroethyl carbonates with silyl dienolates gave γ-allylated products in 60–84% yield and 90–98% ee with high γ-selectivity and branched-to-linear selectivity. The control experiments revealed that the nature of the leaving group of allylic electrophiles in combination with the added chiral phosphoramidite ligand is key to the high regioselectivity and branched-to-linear selectivity of the reaction. Further studies of silyl dienolates are currently underway in this laboratory.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial support provided by the National Institutes of Health (GM-58108 and S10-RR027172) is gratefully acknowledged.
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.angewandte.org.
References
- 1.(a) Jacobsen EN, Pfaltz A, Yamamoto H. Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis. I–III. Springer; Berlin: 1999. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ojima I. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis. 2. Wiley/VCH; New York: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Trost BM, Van Vranken DL. Chem Rev. 1996;96:395. doi: 10.1021/cr9409804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Trost BM, Crawley ML. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2921. doi: 10.1021/cr020027w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lu Z, Ma S. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:258. doi: 10.1002/anie.200605113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Xie X, Chen Y, Ma D. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:16050. doi: 10.1021/ja066991j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Aleman J, Richter B, Jørgensen KA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:5515. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weiler L. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92:6702.for recent examples: Shojaei H, Li-Böhmer Z, von Zezschwitz P. J Org Chem. 2007;72:5091. doi: 10.1021/jo070327j.González MA, Molina-Navarro S. J Org Chem. 2007;72:7462. doi: 10.1021/jo0712401.Gregg C, Perkins MV. Org Biomol Chem. 2012;10:6547. doi: 10.1039/c2ob25501d.Thakur PB, Sirisha K, Sarma AVS, Nanubolu JB, Meshram HM. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:6415.
- 4.(a) Palucki M, Um JM, Yasuda N, Conlon DA, Tsay FR, Hartner FW, Hsiao Y, Marcue B, Karady S, Hughes DL, Dormer PG, Reider PJ. J Org Chem. 2002;67:5508. doi: 10.1021/jo025890a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Shin KJ, Moon HR, George C, Marquez VE. J Org Chem. 2000;65:2172. doi: 10.1021/jo9917691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kazmaier U, Maier S, Zumpe FL. Synlett. 2000:1523. [Google Scholar]; Lin W, Zercher CK. J Org Chem. 2007;72:4390. doi: 10.1021/jo0701379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Carroll MF, Bader AR. J Am Chem Soc. 1953;75:5400. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hyatt JA, Feldman PL, Clemens RJ. J Org Chem. 1984;49:5105. [Google Scholar]; (c) Clemens RJ, Hyatt JA. J Org Chem. 1985;50:2431. [Google Scholar]; (d) Sato M, Sunami S, Sugita Y, Kaneko C. Chem Pharm Bull. 1994;42:839. [Google Scholar]; (e) Sato M, Sunami S, Sugita Y, Kaneko C. Heterocycles. 1995;41:1435. [Google Scholar]; (f) Singer RA, Carreira EM. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:12360. [Google Scholar]; (g) Evans DA, Murry JA, Kozlowski MC. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:5814. [Google Scholar]; (h) Krueger J, Carreira EM. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:837. [Google Scholar]
- 6.For selected reviews, see: Helmchen G, Dahnz A, Dubon P, Schelwies M, Weihofen R. Chem Commun. 2007:675. doi: 10.1039/b614169b.Helmchen G. In: In Iridium Complexes in Organic Synthesis. Oro LA, Claver C, editors. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2009. p. 211.Hartwig JF, Pouy MJ. Top Organomet Chem. 2011;34:169.Liu WB, Xia JB, You SL. Top Organomet Chem. 2012;38:155.Tosatti P, Nelson A, Marsden SP. Org Biomol Chem. 2012;10:3147. doi: 10.1039/c2ob07086c.
- 7.For seminal contributions, see: Takeuchi R, Kashio M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1997;36:263.Janssen JP, Helmchen G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:8025.Ohmura T, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:15164. doi: 10.1021/ja028614m.Kiener CA, Shu C, Incarvito C, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:14272. doi: 10.1021/ja038319h.
- 8.For selected recent examples with stabilized enolates, see: Kanayama T, Yoshida K, Miyabe H, Takemoto Y. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2003;42:2054. doi: 10.1002/anie.200250654.Bartels B, Garcia-Yebra C, Helmchen G. Eur J Org Chem. 2003:1097.Schelwies M, Dübon P, Helmchen G. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:2466. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503945.Dahnz A, Helmchen G. Synlett. 2006:697.Polet D, Alexakis A, Tissot-Croset K, Corminboeuf C, Ditrich K. Chem—Eur J. 2006;12:3596. doi: 10.1002/chem.200501180.Polet D, Rathgeb X, Falciola CA, Langlois JB, El HS, Alexakis A. Chem—Eur J. 2009;15:1205. doi: 10.1002/chem.200801879.Liu WB, Zheng C, Zhuo CX, Dai LX, You SL. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:4812. doi: 10.1021/ja210923k.Liu WB, Reeves CM, Virgil SC, Stoltz BM. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:10626. doi: 10.1021/ja4052075.Liu WB, Reeves CM, Virgil SC, Stoltz BM. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:17298. doi: 10.1021/ja4097829.Chen W, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:2068. doi: 10.1021/ja311363a.Chen W, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:377. doi: 10.1021/ja410650e.
- 9.For selected recent developments, see: Chen W, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:15249. doi: 10.1021/ja306850b.Schafroth MA, Sarlah D, Krautwald S, Carreira EM. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:20276. doi: 10.1021/ja310386m.Hamilton JY, Sarlah D, Carreira EM. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:994. doi: 10.1021/ja311422z.Hamilton JY, Sarlah D, Carreira EM. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:7532. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302731.Krautwald S, Sarlah D, Schafroth MA, Carreira EM. Science. 2013;340:1065. doi: 10.1126/science.1237068.Zhuo CX, Wu QF, Zhao Q, Xu QL, You SL. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:8169. doi: 10.1021/ja403535a.Hamilton JY, Sarlah D, Carreira EM. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:3006. doi: 10.1021/ja412962w.Krautwald S, Schafroth MA, Sarlah D, Carreira EM. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:3020. doi: 10.1021/ja5003247.Chen M, Hartwig JF. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;53 doi: 10.1002/anie.201403844. asap.Yang Z-P, Wu Q-F, You S-L. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;53 doi: 10.1002/anie.201404286. asap.
- 10.Burfeindt J, Patz M, Mueller M, Mayr H. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:3629. [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Gu CL, Liu L, Wang D, Chen YJ. J Org Chem. 2009;74:5754. doi: 10.1021/jo900977y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Dugger RW, Heathcock CH. J Org Chem. 1980;45:1181. [Google Scholar]; (c) Lei B, Fallis A. Can J Chem. 1991;69:1450. [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Sato M, Kanuma N, Kato T. Chem Pharm Bull. 1984;32:106. [Google Scholar]; (b) Sato M, Ogasawara H, Kato T. Chem Pharm Bull. 1984;32:2602. [Google Scholar]; (c) West FG, Fisher PV, Gunawardena GU, Mitchellt S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34:4583. [Google Scholar]; (d) Hart AC, Phillips AJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:1094. doi: 10.1021/ja057899a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Crimmins MT, Smith AC. Org Lett. 2006;8:1003. doi: 10.1021/ol0601601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Custar DW, Zabawa TP, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:804. doi: 10.1021/ja710080q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Hoye T, Danielson ME, May AE, Zhao H. J Org Chem. 2010;75:7052. doi: 10.1021/jo101598y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Yavari I, Bayat MJ, Skoulika S. Synlett. 2013:2591. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Royles BJL. Chem Rev. 1995;95:1981. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


