Skip to main content
Materia Socio-Medica logoLink to Materia Socio-Medica
. 2014 Aug 26;26(4):253–255. doi: 10.5455/msm.2014.253-255

Prevalence, Gender Distribution and Presence of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder by Certain Sociodemographic Characteristics Among University Students

Lidija Sushevska Panevska 1,, Beti Zafirova-Ivanovska 2, Kristin Vasileva 2, Rozalinda Isjanovska 2, Hadzhihamza Kadri 3
PMCID: PMC4214800  PMID: 25395888

Abstract

Introduction:

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurobehavioral developmental disorder usually diagnosed in children, with appearance of the first symptoms before the age of seven years. The disorder is characterized by inattention and/or impulsivity and hyperactivity that can seriously affect many aspects of behavior and performance at school. Specific sociodemographic characteristics seem to contribute to the appearance of ADHD.

Material and methods:

The study was done on a sample of 500 university students. For the measurement of ADHD symptoms, the ADHD Adult Self-report Scale was used and a specifically designed questionnaire for collecting sociodemographic data.

Results:

The results of this screening study showed that in 184 (48.7%) respondents the symptoms of the disorder in the activity and attention were registered. ADHD is highly significant associated with gender (p = 0.0004). Men more often than women have this kind of disorder. Our results also showed that living and material conditions were not associated with a higher prevalence of ADHD.

Keywords: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD, sociodemographic characteristics, gender, prevalence, university students

1. INTRODUCTION

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is neurobehavioral developmental disorder (1,2) mostly diagnosed in children, with appearance of the first symptoms before the age of seven years (3, 4). It is diagnosed twice more often in boys than in girls (5). The most common symptoms of ADHD are impulsivity (6), hyperactivity (6) and inattention (7). ADHD can seriously affect many aspects of behavior in school and at home. The prevalence of ADHD was until recently 3-5%, and over the past few years it has reached 8-12% worldwide, depending on the geographic and local factors. The varying prevalence rates also result from different definitions of the condition, questionnaires (parent or teacher as informant, or both) and interview techniques applied, and age and size of study sample. Using only the parent’s rating sales and assessments, the prevalence is 4-9% (8-19). ADHD may significantly affect an individual through childhood as well as in adulthood, especially if it is not optimally managed. ADHD has been associated with lower professional status, crime, and substance abuse (20). Both parents of a child with ADHD and community suffer the consequences of problems associated with ADHD (21,22). A number of people have symptoms of ADHD to an extent that it does not significantly affect their academic, professional and social performance. ADHD can be associated with comorbidities, such as oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, anxiety or depression (23).

A recent large study of ADHD in a national sample of US children showed that the white non-Hispanic American population satisfied the criteria for ADHD more frequently than the Mexican-American population and other races and ethnicities. The authors could not explain why the prevalence of ADHD was lower in Mexican-American children, but it was proposed that it could be associated with genetic factors. About 38.8% of the children with ADHD had been taking medication for ADHD in the previous year, and 32.0% for a longer period. In addition, children with poorer living conditions were diagnosed with ADHD more frequently than children with better living conditions. The authors speculated that poorer children did not have the same access to treatment as wealthy children and therefore used medication less frequently (24).

The risk factors for ADHD also include premature birth and prenatal and childhood exposure to toxic substances.

The aim of our research was to determine the prevalence and gender distribution of ADHD in relation to selected sociodemographic characteristics such as ethnicity, living conditions, and material conditions.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study design was cross sectional. There were 127 boys and 251 girls,. The target group are university students from the Faculty of Medical Sciences in the town of Štip, in Macedonia.. The number of participants in the survey is 500 respondents (in order to make better screening), from all years of study and from all four study programs (general medicine, dentistry, pharmacy and vocational studies). It represents 25% of the total number of students of medical sciences and research will be included every fourth student who attends the lectures.

Inclusion criteria: research concerns the students of the Faculty of Medical Sciences students who agree to participate in research.

Exclusion criteria: the research will not participate students who refuse to participate because of personal reasons.

Instruments

To measure the ADHD symptoms, there are many scales that are used in the world (ex.TOVA, Conors, Brown, Copeland, SNAP-IV, VANDERBILT). In our country, there is still no standardized scale, and for determining the symptomatology of ADHD we decided to use the Adult Self-report Scale as a measuring instrument. It gives a solid display of symptoms associated with behavior and global impression.

Sociodemographic data was collected using a specially designed questionnaire. The latter included questions concerning nationality/ethnicity, material conditions(subjective assessment of own wealth/material conditions).

Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test, Spearman’s rank correlation and Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

From 500 university students which were tested, we received 378 filled questionnaires.

The results of this screening study showed that in 184 (48.7%) respondents the symptoms of the disorder in the activity and attention were registered.(Table 1)

Table 1.

Prevalence of ADHD

graphic file with name MSM-26-253-g001.jpg

The research results show that the ADHD is highly significant associated with gender (p = 0.0004). Men more often than women have this kind of disorder. Gender distribution is shown in Table 1 and Figure 2 it notes that activity disorder and attention there in 61.4% of male respondents and 42.2% among female respondents.(Table 2 and Figure 1)

Table 2.

ADHD-gender distribution. Pearson Chi-square: 1,43, df=1, p=0,0004** p<0,01

graphic file with name MSM-26-253-g002.jpg

Figure 1.

Figure 1

ADHD-gender distribution

The financial(material) condition of the respondents does not significantly influence the frequency of occurrence of the disorder activity and attention (p = 0.2).

This kind of disorder have 44.95% of the respondents with a good socioeconomic status, 51.55% of respondents with “medium” material condition, and the highest percentage, 63.2% respondents their financial situation have labeled as “bad”.(Table 3)

Table 3.

Presence of ADHD by material condition. Pearson Chi-square: 3,23, df=2, p=0,199 p>0,05

graphic file with name MSM-26-253-g004.jpg

In addition, worldwide findings that children from families with unsatisfactory living and material conditions more frequently had ADHD symptoms may be explained by the parents not recognizing the condition, and confusing it with normal restlessness, which may also be due to their lower level of education.

The risk factors for ADHD include also premature birth or prenatal or childhood exposure to toxic substances.

Availability of ADHD medications has a significant role in the treatment and reducing symptoms of this condition. In Macedonia, no medications for ADHD have been registered yet and people with this condition have to buy them abroad.

Physicians, teachers, parents and other people working with children should be educated about the ADHD symptoms in order to recognize them early and enable appropriate and timely treatment.

4. CONCLUSION

Studies on the prevalence of ADHD in relation to sociodemographic characteristics are scarce, and these aspects should be researched more thoroughly.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: NONE DECLARED.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Faraone SV, Sergeant J, Gillberg C, Biederman J. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: Is it an American condition? World Psychiatry. 2003;2:104–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zwi M, Ramchandani P, Joughin C. Evidence and belief in ADHD. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2000;321(7267):975–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7267.975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Greenhill LL. Diagnosing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 7):31–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nair J, Ehimare U, Beitman BD, Nair SS, Lavin A. Clinical review: evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of ADHD in children. Mo Med. 2006;103(6):617–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dulcan M. Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children, adolescents and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(10 Suppl):85S–121S. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199710001-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.National Institute of Mental Health; 2009. May 08, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Paule MG, Rowland AS, Ferguson SA, et al. Attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: characteristics, interventions and models. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2000;22(5):631–51. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(00)00095-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taylor E, Sandberg S. Hyperactive behavior in English schoolchildren: a questionnaire survey. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1984;12:143–155. doi: 10.1007/BF00913466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Taylor A. London: The Spastics Society; 1986. The overactive child. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gleeson D, Parker D. Hyperactivity in a group of children referred to a Scottish Child Guidance Service: a significant problem. Br J Educ Psychol. 1989;59:262–265. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1989.tb03099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miller RG, Palkes HS, Stewart MA. Hyperactive children in suburban elementary schools. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1973;4:121–127. doi: 10.1007/BF01433256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lambert NM, Sandoval J, Sassone D. Prevalence of hyperactivity in elementary school children as a function of social system definers. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1978;48:446–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1978.tb01334.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Safer D, Allen RP. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1976. Hyperactive children: diagnosis and management. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gadow KD, Nolan EE, Litcher L, et al. Comparison of attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder symptom subtypes in Ukrainian school children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39:1520–1527. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200012000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baumgaertel A, Wolraich ML, Dietrich M. Comparison of diagnostic criteria for attention deficit disorders in a German elementary school sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34:629–638. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199505000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wolraich ML, Hannah JN, Pinnock TY, et al. Comparison of diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in a county-wide sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35:319–324. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199603000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wolraich ML, Hannah JN, Baumgaertel A, et al. Examination of DSM-IV criteria for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a county-wide sample. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998;19:162–168. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199806000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Graetz BW, Sawyer MG, Hazell PL, et al. Validity of DSMIV ADHD subtypes in a nationally representative sample of Australian children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40:1410–1417. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200112000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Swanson JM, Sergeant JA, Taylor E, et al. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and hyperkinetic disorder. Lancet. 1998;351:429–433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Biederman J, Wilens T, Mick E, et al. Is ADHD a risk factor for psychoactive substance use disorders? Findings from a four-year prospective follow-up study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:21–29. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199701000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mash EJ, Johnston C. Parental perceptions of child behavior problems, parenting self-esteem, and mothers’ reported stress in younger and older hyperactive and normal children. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:86–99. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.1.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murphy KR, Barkley RA. Parents of children with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: psychological and attentional impairment. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1996;66:93–102. doi: 10.1037/h0080159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bauermeister J, Shrout P, Chávez L, Rubio-Stipec M, Ramírez R, Padilla L, et al. ADHD and gender: are risks and sequela of ADHD the same for boys and girls? Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry. 2007;48(8):831–839. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01750.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Froelich T. Prevalence, recognition, and treatment of attentiondeficit/ hyperactivity disorder in a national sample of US children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(9):857–864. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.9.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Materia Socio-Medica are provided here courtesy of The Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina

RESOURCES