Abstract
Here, the draft genome sequences of two Vibrionaceae, Vibrio ponticus C121 and Photobacterium aphoticum C119, which were isolated from the coral reef vicinity in Okinawa, Japan, are reported. The genome provides further insight into the genomic plasticity, biocomplexity, and ecophysiology, including pathogenicity and evolution, of these genera.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
The family Vibrionaceae encompasses diverse metabolically versatile marine bacteria that are associated with many significant events in the marine ecosystem, including fish/shellfish pathogenicity (1), mutual symbiosis with marine organisms (2, 3), and mediation of the nutrient cycle in the marine food web (4, 5). They are ubiquitous in marine environments and are characterized by high genomic plasticity (6). These dynamics have made the differentiation of sister species difficult (7). Interestingly, such characteristics have also nominated Vibrionaceae species as a great test model for genomic taxonomy (7).
To date, the family Vibrionaceae accounts for 142 validly described species and the number is growing continuously (http://www.bacterio.net/-candidatus.html). However, the rapid expansion of the family has also demanded more reliable, reproducible, and informative schemes to define a new species that can be attained using microbial genomic taxonomy. While the type strains of V. ponticus (8) and P. aphoticum (9) were described in 2004 and 2011, respectively, no genome sequence has been reported since then. Our study reports the first draft genome sequences of V. ponticus C121 and P. aphoticum C119, which were isolated from water samples taken near the coral reef vicinity of Iriomote-Ishigaki National Park, Okinawa, Japan. V. ponticus strain was isolated not only from seawater and mussels but also diseased sea bream (8) and Japanese sea bass (10). P. aphoticum was isolated from seawater (9). The species might be found closed as a clade of P. rosenbergii on the basis of multilocus sequence analysis (11). The data presented here is aimed to extend the current database of Vibrionaceae and subsequently assist further elucidation in the genomics, pathogenicity, and evolution of this group of bacteria.
The genome sequences of V. ponticus C121 and P. aphoticum C119 were sequenced with the Ion PGM System (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and assembled using Newbler version 2.8. The annotation and genome analysis were performed by RAST (Rapid Annotation Subsystem Technology) (12). The size of the draft genome of V. ponticus C121 is 4,658,121 bp, comprising 98 contigs with a G+C content of 45.2%. On the other hand, the size of the draft genome of P. aphoticum C119 is 5,412,298 bp, comprising 56 contigs with a G+C content of 49.7%. The redundancies of both were 71 and 26, and N50 contig lengths were 128,889 bp and 217,077 bp, respectively. The numbers of putative coding sequences (CDS) were 5,654 for V. ponticus C121 and 6,976 for P. aphoticum C119; of rRNA sequences were 3 and 6; and of tRNA sequences were 78 and 61, respectively.
These strains have been deposited in the Japan Collection of Microorganisms as JCM 19238 (C121) and JCM 19237 (C119), respectively.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The genome data have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers BBMI01000001 to BBMI01000098 for Vibrio ponticus C121 and BBMN01000001 to BBMN01000056 for Photobacterium aphoticum C119.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Genome Information Upgrading Program of the National BioResource Project from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (to M.H. and M.O.) and by the Strategic Japanese-Brazilian Cooperative Program, Biomass and Bioenergy, and Kaken (MEXT) (26660168) to T.S. P.M.M. thanks CAPES for a PhD scholarship (4848-14-9 CAPES/JSPS).
Footnotes
Citation Al-saari N, Meirelles PM, Mino S, Suda W, Oshima K, Hattori M, Ohkuma M, Thompson FL, Gomez-Gil B, Sawabe T, Sawabe T. 2014. Draft genome sequences of two Vibrionaceae species, Vibrio ponticus C121 and Photobacterium aphoticum C119, isolated as coral reef microbiota. Genome Announc. 2(5):e01095-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01095-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Austin B, Zhang X-H. 2006. Vibrio harveyi: a significant pathogen of marine vertebrates and invertebrates. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 43:119–124. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01989.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ruby EG, Urbanowski M, Campbell J, Dunn A, Faini M, Gunsalus R, Lostroh P, Lupp C, McCann J, Millikan D, Schaefer A, Stabb E, Stevens A, Visick K, Whistler C, Greenberg EP. 2005. Complete genome sequence of Vibrio fischeri: a symbiotic bacterium with pathogenic congeners. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:3004–3009. 10.1073/pnas.0409900102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ruby EG. 1996. Lessons from a cooperative, bacterial-animal association: the Vibrio fischeri-Euprymna scolopes light organ symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 50:591–624. 10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Takemura AF, Chien DM, Polz MF. 2014. Associations and dynamics of Vibrionaceae in the environment, from the genus to the population level. Front Microbiol. 5:38. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Thompson JR, Polz MF. 2006. Dynamics of Vibrio populations and their role in environmental nutrient cycling, p 190–203. In Thompson FL, Austin B, Swings J. (ed), The biology of vibrios. ASM Press, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
- 6. Thompson FL, Klose KE, AVIB Group . 2006. Vibrio2005: the first international conference on the biology of vibrios. J. Bacteriol. 188:4592–4596. 10.1128/JB.00141-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Thompson CC, Vicente ACP, Souza RC, Vasconcelos ATR, Vesth T, Alves N, Ussery DW, Iida T, Thompson FL. 2009. Genomic taxonomy of vibrios. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:258. 10.1186/1471-2148-9-258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Macián MC, Garay E, Grimont PAD, Pujalte MJ. 2004. Vibrio ponticus sp. nov., a neighbour of V. fluvialis-V. furnissii clade, isolated from gilthead sea bream, mussels and seawater. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 27:535–540. 10.1078/0723202041748127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lucena T, Ruvira MA, Pascual J, Garay E, Macián MC, Arahal DR, Pujalte MJ. 2011. Photobacterium aphoticum sp. nov., isolated from coastal water. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61:1579–1584. 10.1099/ijs.0.025171-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Xie ZY, Hu CQ, Zhang LP, Chen C, Ren CH, Shen Q. 2007. Identification and pathogenicity of Vibrio ponticus affecting cultured Japanese sea bass, Lateolabrax japonicus (Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes). Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 45:62–67. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02141.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sawabe T, Ogura Y, Matsumura Y, Feng G, Amin AR, Mino S, Nakagawa S, Sawabe T, Kumar R, Fukui Y, Satomi M, Matsushima R, Thompson FL, Gomez-Gil B, Christen R, Maruyama F, Kurokawa K, Hayashi T. 2013. Updating the Vibrio clades defined by multilocus sequence phylogeny: proposal of eight new clades, and the description of Vibrio tritonius sp. nov. Front Microbiol. 4:414. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]