Skip to main content
Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology
. 2014 Jun 1;7(6):e10907. doi: 10.5812/jjm.10907

Interferon-Gamma and Interlukin-4 Patterns in BALB/c Mice Suffering From Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Treated With Cantharidin

Yahya Maroufi 1, Fatemeh Ghaffarifar 2,*, Abdolhosein Dalimi 2, Zohreh Sharifi 3
PMCID: PMC4217669  PMID: 25371808

Abstract

Background:

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a health problem in the world. Lesions should be treated on cosmetically or functionally important sites, such as the face and hands. Cantharidin is a terpenoid compound produced naturally by beetles of Meloidae and Oedemeridae families.

Objectives:

The current study aimed to investigate the effect of cantharidin on Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) lesions and IFN-γ and IL-4 patterns in infected BALB/c mice.

Materials and Methods:

Infected BALB/c mice were divided into five groups as: untreated (control group), eucerin-treated and 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% cantharidin-treated. Lesions diameter was measured by Vernier caliper every three days for four weeks. Cytokines levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using U-CyTech kit.

Results:

The results indicated that treatment with cantharidin exacerbates lesions compared with the controls, except for 0.05% cantharidin dose that restrained lesion growth significantly. Interferon gamma level in cantharidin-treated groups was significantly less than that of the control group. But interlukin-4 level was similar among the groups.

Conclusions:

The current study results indicated that high doses of cantharidin exacerbates leishmaniasis lesion, but low dose of cantharidin inhibits lesion growth.

Keywords: Mice, Inbred BALB/c; Cantharidin; Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous; Interferon-gamma

1. Background

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is one of the health problems in the world. About 12 million people are infected by Leishmania in 88 countries around world (1.5 to 2 million new cases each year). Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) is caused by variable species of Leishmania such as Leishmania major. Clinical manifestation of CL is characterized by ulcerative skin lesions developing at the site of sandfly bite. Lesions should be treated on cosmetically or functionally important sites, such as the face and hands. The pentavalent antimony sodium stibogluconate and meglumine antimoniate are the main chemotherapy. In addition to side effects, resistance and relapse happen (1, 2). Cantharidin is a terpenoid compound produced naturally by families of Meloidae and Oedemeridae beetles (3). Chinese have used it as a traditional medicine about 2000 years ago (4). It has been used to treat wart and cutaneous lesions (4, 5). Hakim Jorjani used cantharidin to treat wart, hair loss, rabidity and black nails (6).

Cantharidin is a protein phosphatase 1 and 2A (PP1 & 2A) inhibitor, and PP1 and 2A are primary targets of cantharidin (3,7, 8). There are some studies about the effect of cantharidin on several cancer cells (9-12). Cantharidin induces apoptosis in cancer cells and also in L. major in vitro and in vivo (13-15). In experimental leishmaniasis, immunity is principally mediated by T lymphocytes. T helper (Th1)and Th2 cells can be identified by the cytokines they secrete: Th1 cells secrete activators of cell-mediated immunity such as IFN-γ, while Th2 cells secrete cytokines such as IL-4, which promote antibody responses (16). Interferon-gamma (IFN-ϒ) is the essential cytokine for inducing protective immunity against cutaneous leishmaniasis. IFN-ϒ kills the parasite and causes protective immunity in both human and murine cutaneous leishmaniasis (16, 17). But, BALB/c mice that develop a typical Th2 response are highly susceptible to leishmaniasis (18).

2. Objectives

The current study aimed to investigate the effect of cantharidin on CL lesions and Interferon-gamma (IFN-ϒ) (as an indicator of Th1-type response), and Interlukin-4 (IL-4) (as a Th2-type response indicator) patterns in BALB/c mice infected with L. major.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Animals

Six eight-week-old female BALB/c mice were purchased from Razi Institute (Tehran, Iran).They were fed standard mouse chow and ad libitum water.

3.2. Parasites

L. major MRHO/IR/75/ER was used in this study, the parasite was maintained by passage through BALB/c mice and culture in NNN medium.

3.3. Mice Infecting

Thirty female BALB/c mice were infected by injecting 2×106/mL stationary phase L. major promastigotes into the base of tail. The mice were divided into five groups as: untreated (control), eucerin-treated, 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% cantharidin-treated groups.

3.4. Cantharidin Preparation

Cantharidin was purchased from Sigma (Germany). It was dissolved in eucerin as ointment base. Cantharidin ointment was prepared in three doses (0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5%). Cantharidin was used once a day for four weeks topically.

3.5. Lesion Size and Cytokines Level Measurement

Cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions diameter was measured by Vernier caliper every three days for four weeks. To measure IFN-ϒ and IL-4 level, mice were killed at the end of treatment. Spleen lymphocytes were extracted and 1 x 106/mL lymphocytes was cultured in 24-well plates in the RPMI-1640 cell culture medium (GibCo, USA) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; GibCo, USA) and 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Sigma, Germany). Soluble Leishmania antigens (SLA) were obtained by resuspending L. major promastigotes in sterile PBS at a concentration about 108 parasite/mL. Parasites were lysed by five freeze-thawing cycles, and then centrifuged at 4°C for 15 minutes. The supernatant was collected and protein concentration was measured by Bradford assay. Soluble Leishmania antigens, by concentration of 20 μg/mL, were added to wells and then plates incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Supernatants were collected after 48 and 72 hours and stored at -80°C until use. Cytokines levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using U-CyTech (bioscience, Netherlands) kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results were shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16 software for Windows.

4. Results

4.1. Lesion Size

Table 1 shows the lesion size mean before and after treatment in different groups. The results of the current study indicated that treatment with cantharidin exacerbates lesions compared with the controls, excluding 0.05% dose. But 0.05% cantharidin restrained lesion growth significantly (P < 0.05).

Table1. Lesion Size in Different Groups Before and After Treatmenta.

Groups Before Treatment After Treatment
Untreated (control) 2.50 ± 0.50 3.70 ± 0.18
Eucerin-treated 5.66 ± 1.33 7.19 ± 0.59
Cantharidin-treated
0.05% 4.6 ± 0.60 4.54 ± 0.19
0.1% 5.7 ± 1.00 6.13 ± 0.33
0.5% 7.33 ± 0.44 10.28 ± 0.29

a Data showed as Mean ± SD.

4.2. IFN-ϒ and IL-4 Pattern

Control group and eucerin-treated group produced high levels of IFN-ϒ, but cantharidin-treated groups showed low levels of IFN-ϒ, significantly (P < 0.05) (Figure 1). There was no significant difference between IFN-ϒ levels in eucerin-treated and control groups. Interlukin-4 level was similar among the groups (Figure 2).

Figure 1. IFN-ϒ Level in Lymphocytes Separated From Spleen in different Groups After 48 and 72 Hours Following Treated With Soluble Leishmania Antigen.

Figure 1.

Figure 2. IL-4 Level in Lymphocytes Separated From Spleen in Different Groups After 48 and 72 Hous Following Treated With Soluble Leishmania Antigen.

Figure 2.

5. Discussion

This is the first report showing the effect of cantharidin on IFN-ϒ and IL-4 in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Results showed that cantharidin exacerbates CL lesion, except for 0.05% cantharidin. Cantharidin suppresses Th1 type response by inhibiting IFN-ϒ production, but it has no effect on IL-4. In the current study, treatment with 0.05% cantharidin restrained lesion growth, but it was unable to increase IFN-ϒ production. Some studies indicate the inflammatory reaction in blister location with lymphocytes and macrophages infiltration. Neutrophils are primary antimicrobial effector cells, and their main function is affecting phagocytosis and destroying invading pathogens. Following L. major transmission, neutrophils were observed capturing parasites rapidly and efficiently. Neutrophils produce and secret myeloperoxidase causing tissue damage (19-21). Cantharidin induces neutrophils infiltration into the blister site in the first 24 hours and macrophages from 24 to 72 hours (19, 21). Infiltrating neutrophils did not destroy the parasite. Dendritic cells produce IL-12, which drives the generation of Th1 cells. Th1 cells in turn activate macrophages to increase inducible nitric oxide synthases (iNOS) and nitric oxide (NO) production, which results in killing the intracellular parasites (20). Cantharidin arrests dendritic cells proliferation and IFN-ϒ production (22). Norcantharidin, demethylated form of cantharidin, inhibits peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) proliferation in vitro (23). Also it can inhibit IL-12 production in human leukemic Jurket T cells, but doses less than 2 μg/mL induce IL-12 production (24).

The current study results indicate that high doses of cantharidin exacerbates lesion due to Th1-type response, therefore inhibiting IFN-ϒ production. But lesion growth in the group treated with 0.05% cantharidin was restrained. It can be supposed that cantharidin with low dose accelerates lesion healing.

Acknowledgments

This study was performed as PhD thesis and was supported by Tarbiat Modares University.

Footnotes

Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:Cantharidin is a vesicant that induces apoptosis in various cells. Low dose of cantharidin restrains lesion growth significantly. Interferon gamma level in cantharidin-treated groups was significantly less than that of the control group. But interlukin-4 level was similar among groups.

Authors’ Contribution:The funding organizations are academic institutions and had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, and analysis of the data; or preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. Yahya Maroufi carried out the design and coordinated the study, participated in all experiments and prepared the manuscript. Fatemeh Ghaffarifar was the supervisor of this study, Abdolhosein Dalimi and Zohreh Sharifi provided assistance in the design of the study, coordinated and participated in manuscript preparation. All authors have read and approved the content of the manuscript.

Financial Disclosure:The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Support:Authors wish to thank Tarbiat Modares University of Medical Sciences for the financial support.

References

  • 1.Hepburn NC. Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2000;25(5):363–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2000.00664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reithinger R, Dujardin JC, Louzir H, Pirmez C, Alexander B, Brooker S. Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7(9):581–96. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70209-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bonness K, Aragon IV, Rutland B, Ofori-Acquah S, Dean NM, Honkanen RE. Cantharidin-induced mitotic arrest is associated with the formation of aberrant mitotic spindles and lagging chromosomes resulting, in part, from the suppression of PP2Aalpha. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5(11):2727–36. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moed L, Shwayder TA, Chang MW. Cantharidin revisited: a blistering defense of an ancient medicine. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(10):1357–60. doi: 10.1001/archderm.137.10.1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deponte M. Programmed cell death in protists. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1783(7):1396–405. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yousefi M. From blisters beetle untile cantharidin. Darmangar. 2004;3:36–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li YM, Casida JE. Cantharidin-binding protein: identification as protein phosphatase 2A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(24):11867–70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Eldridge GD, St Lawrence JS, Little CE, Shelby MC, Brasfield TL. Barriers to condom use and barrier method preferences among low-income African-American women. Women Health. 1995;23(1):73–89. doi: 10.1300/J013v23n01_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang XH, Yin YQ, Sui CG, Meng FD, Ma P, Jiang YH. Inhibitory effect of Cantharidin on proliferation of A549 cells. Chin J Cancer Res. 2007;19(4):283–6. doi: 10.1007/s11670-007-0283-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sagawa M, Nakazato T, Uchida H, Ikeda Y, Kizaki M. Cantharidin induces apoptosis of human multiple myeloma cells via inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(9):1820–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00872.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fan YZ, Fu JY, Zhao ZM, Chen CQ. Influence of norcantharidin on proliferation, proliferation-related gene proteins proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 of human gallbladder carcinoma GBC-SD cells. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2004;3(4):603–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rauh R, Kahl S, Boechzelt H, Bauer R, Kaina B, Efferth T. Molecular biology of cantharidin in cancer cells. Chin Med. 2007;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1749-8546-2-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marufi Y, Ghaffarifar F, Dalimi A, Sharifi Z, Hassan ZM. Cantharidin-induced apoptosis in Leishmania major promastigotes and macrophages infected by Leishmania major amastigotes in-vitro. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2012;22(87):33–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maroufi Y, Ghaffarifar F, Dalimi A, Sharifi Z, Hasan Z. A study on the cytotoxic effect of cantharidin on Leishmania major promastigote and amastigote survival in vitro. Feyz J Kashan Univ Med Sci. 2012;16(5):406–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maroufi Y, Ghaffarifar F, Dalimi A, Sharifi Z, Hasan Z. Effect of Cantharidin on Apoptosis of the Leishmania major and on Parasite Load in BALB/c Mice. Res J Parasitol. 2013;8(1):In Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sharma U, Singh S. Immunobiology of leishmaniasis. Indian J Exp Biol. 2009;47(6):412–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rosas LE, Keiser T, Pyles R, Durbin J, Satoskar AR. Development of protective immunity against cutaneous leishmaniasis is dependent on STAT1-mediated IFN signaling pathway. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33(7):1799–805. doi: 10.1002/eji.200323163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang ZE, Reiner SL, Zheng S, Dalton DK, Locksley RM. CD4+ effector cells default to the Th2 pathway in interferon gamma-deficient mice infected with Leishmania major. J Exp Med. 1994;179(4):1367–71. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.4.1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dinh PH, Corraza F, Mestdagh K, Kassengera Z, Doyen V, Michel O. Validation of the cantharidin-induced skin blister as an in vivo model of inflammation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72(6):912–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04020.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nylen S, Gautam S. Immunological perspectives of leishmaniasis. J Glob Infect Dis. 2010;2(2):135–46. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.62876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zou XJ, Liu HP, Cheng T, Shi L, Zu P, Zhang YJ. [A technique for investigating the component of cantharidin blisters by flow cytometry]. Zhong Yao Cai. 2007;30(7):823–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hsieh CH, Huang YC, Tsai TH, Chen YJ. Cantharidin modulates development of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011;25(8):1740–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen YC, Chang SC, Wu MH, Chuang KA, Wu JY, Tsai WJ, et al. Norcantharidin reduced cyclins and cytokines production in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Life Sci. 2009;84(7-8):218–26. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2008.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liao HF, Chen YJ, Chou CH, Wang FW, Kuo CD. Norcantharidin induces cell cycle arrest and inhibits progression of human leukemic Jurkat T cells through mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated regulation of interleukin-2 production. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011;25(1):206–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brieflands

RESOURCES