Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun 12;328(7453):1410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38097.590810.7C

Table 1.

Randomised controlled trials comparing risk of instrumental vaginal delivery associated with epidural analgesia or parenteral opioids

Trial; country Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network score* Comments
Bofill et al, 199723; United States +, not blinded Nulliparous women; included in meta-analysis
Chestnut et al, 198711; United States NA Nulliparous women; excluded, as study compared 0.75% lignocaine with saline epidural infusions during second stage labour
Chestnut et al 198712, United States NA Nulliparous women; excluded, as study compared 0.125% bupivacaine with saline epidural infusions during second stage labour
Chestnut et al, 199413; United States NA Nulliparous women; excluded as study compared early with late institution of bupivacaine epidural analgesia
Clark et al, 199824; United States +, not blinded Nulliparous women; included in meta-analysis
Dickinson et al, 200227; Australia +, not blinded Nulliparous women; included in meta-analysis, separate data available for women with spontaneous and induced labour
Gambling et al, 199821; United States +, not blinded Mixed parity women; nulliparous data not available
Howell et al, 200118; United Kingdom NA Nulliparous women; excluded as study used bupivacaine 0.25% boluses
Loughnan et al, 200025; United Kingdom +, not blinded Nulliparous women; included in meta-analysis
Nikkola et al, 199717; Finland NA Nulliparous women; excluded as study used bupivacaine 0.5% boluses, which were stopped in second stage labour
Noble et al, 197116; United Kingdom NA Mixed parity women; excluded as study used bupivacaine 0.5% boluses
Philipsen and Jensen, 198914; Denmark NA Mixed parity women; excluded as study used bupivacaine 0.375% boluses
Ramin et al, 199519; United States −, not blinded, no intention to treat data Mixed parity women; nulliparous data not available
Robinson et al, 198015; United Kingdom NA Mixed parity women; excluded as study used bupivacaine 0.5% boluses
Sharma et al, 199720; United States +, not blinded Mixed parity women; data on nulliparous women available only for caesarean section meta-analysis
Sharma et al, 200226; United States +, not blinded Nulliparous women; included in meta-analysis
Thorp et al, 199322; United States +, not blinded Nulliparous women; included in meta-analysis

NA=not assessed.

*

Positive and minus signs indicate how well study minimised bias.