Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2014 Nov;16(Suppl 5):v206. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou277.3

SM-03: A RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PILOT TRIAL OF ARMODAFINIL FOR FATIGUE IN PATIENTS WITH GLIOMAS UNDERGOING RADIOTHERAPY

Eudocia Lee 1, Alona Muzikansky 2, Santosh Kesari 3, Eric Wong 4, Camilo Fadul 5, David Reardon 1, Andrew Norden 1, Lakshmi Nayak 1, Mikael Rinne 1, Brian Alexander 1, Nils Arvold 1, Lisa Doherty 1, Debra LaFrankie 1, Julee Pulverenti 1, Katrina Smith 1, Sarah Gaffey 1, Alexandra Kenney 1, Samantha Hammond 7, Jan Drappatz 6, Patrick Wen 1
PMCID: PMC4218612

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a common symptom among glioma patients and affects quality of life. Armodafinil, a wakefulness-promoting medication, benefits patients with fatigue of various causes. This study evaluates the effects of armodafinil on fatigue in glioma patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18; KPS ≥ 60; grade 2-4 glioma undergoing RT to a total dose of 50-60 Gy with or without chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to armodafinil or placebo. Fatigue assessments were made at baseline, Day 22, Day 43, and Day 56 with the FACIT-F Fatigue Scale, FACT-G, Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS). The primary aim was to detect a difference in the 42-day change in FACIT-F fatigue subscale scores between the two groups using a 2-sample Wilcoxon statistic. Secondary outcomes include a 42-day change in FACT-G, CFS, and BFI. RESULTS: In the armodafinil arm, median age was 56 (25-79), median KPS was 90 (70-100), 58.5% with grade 4 glioma, 34.2% with grade 3 glioma, 2.4% with grade 2 glioma. In the placebo arm, median age was 54 (19-78), median KPS was 90 (70-100), 47.8% with grade 4 glioma, 30.8% with grade 3 glioma, 10.3% with grade 2 glioma. The median 42-day change in the FACIT-F fatigue subscale scores in the armodafinil arm was 1 (range -40 to 26) and in the placebo arm was -5.50 (range -65 to 28) with Wilcoxon p-value of 0.14. Toxicity was rare and similar between arms. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with armodafinil is well tolerated in glioma patients undergoing RT. Preliminary results do not demonstrate statistically significant reduction in fatigue between groups. Updated results will be presented.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES