Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Mar 14;35(5):570–573. doi: 10.1086/675837

Surveying the Surveillance: Surgical Site Infections Excluded by the January 2013 Updated Surveillance Definitions

Kristen V Dicks 1,a, Sarah S Lewis 1,a, Michael J Durkin 1, Arthur W Baker 1, Rebekah W Moehring 1, Luke F Chen 1, Daniel J Sexton 1, Deverick J Anderson 1
PMCID: PMC4219409  NIHMSID: NIHMS638941  PMID: 24709727

Abstract

The updated 2013 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/ National Healthcare Safety Network definitions for surgical site infections (SSIs) reduced the duration of prolonged surveillance from 1 year to 90 days and defined which procedure types require prolonged surveillance. Applying the updated 2013 SSI definitions to cases analyzed using the pre-2013 surveillance definitions excluded 10% of previously identified SSIs.


Hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers perform surveillance for surgical site infections (SSIs) to identify trends in infection rates, improve infection prevention practices, and decrease the incidence and burden of these costly and common infections.1,2 Ideally, infection surveillance definitions are relevant, objective, easy to employ, and reproducible with minimal variation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) SSI definitions undergo revisions every few years to improve the definitions’ utility and relevance to changing practice.35

The CDC updated the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definitions for SSIs in January 2013. Before 2013, postoperative surveillance for an SSI continued for a year if prosthetic material such as a joint or hip pros-thesis was implanted.6 In the new 2013 SSI definitions, surveillance for an SSI continues for 30 days for some procedures and for 90 days for others.7 The duration of postoperative surveillance is now wholly dependent on the type of surgical procedure rather than the presence of implants or prosthetic material. Our primary objective was to assess how these changes impact SSI detection and reporting when applied to a historical cohort.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected SSI surveillance data from hospitals participating in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network (DICON). DICON is a network of 43 community hospitals in 5 states throughout the southeastern United States that has been described previously.8 Trained infection preventionists at each hospital collect surveillance data using a standardized database employing NHSN definitions. DICON liaison infection preventionists validate a subset of surveillance data each month.

Complete surveillance data on SSIs following 39 categories of surgical procedures performed from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2011, were available from 35 acute care hospitals and 2 ambulatory surgical centers in DICON. Surveillance was conducted for 1 year following surgical procedures, according to the pre-2013 definitions. Researchers applied the updated NHSN surveillance definitions to previously collected data by shortening the follow-up times to 30 or 90 days according to procedure type, on the basis of documented dates of infection. Procedure-specific SSI rates (ie, the number of SSIs detected per 100 procedures) were calculated for all 39 procedure categories using the old and new definitions.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 235,571 surgical procedures during the 2-year period. Surveillance SSI definitions in use prior to 2013 detected 2,420 SSIs (rate, 1.03 SSIs per 100 procedures); the 2013 SSI definitions detected 2,187 SSIs (rate, 0.93 SSIs per 100 procedures). Approximately 1 in 10 (n = 233 [9.6%]) SSIs detected by the pre-2013 definitions were not detected by the 2013 definitions. Seventy-one (30%) of these 233 SSIs occurred in patients undergoing procedures that previously required surveillance for 12 months but that now require surveillance for 30 days; 162 (70%) of the 233 excluded SSIs occurred in patients undergoing surgical procedures that previously required surveillance for 12 months but that now require surveillance for 90 days.

The proportion of SSIs that were detected by the pre-2013 definitions but excluded by the 2013 definitions varied depending on procedure type (Table 1). The change in SSI rate in procedures designated for SSI surveillance for 30 days postoperative was minimal, with the exceptions of laminectomies (13 [13%] of 97 SSIs excluded) and joint arthroplasties other than knee and hip (9 [60%] of 15 SSIs excluded). Among procedures designated for SSI surveillance for 90 days postoperative, the 2013 definitions failed to capture a substantial number of SSIs occurring after knee replacement surgeries (51 [25%] of 203 SSIs excluded) and open fracture repairs (32 [21%] of 149 SSIs excluded) that had been detected by the pre-2013 definitions.

TABLE 1.

Comparison of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) by Pre-2013 and 2013 Definitions for Procedures Undergoing 30-Day Surveillance and 90-Day Surveillance

Procedure Total surgeries SSIs by old definition SSIs by new definition SSIs excluded, no. (%) Old SSI ratea New SSI ratea SSI rate changea (new − old)
SSI data for 30- and 90-day surveillance procedures combined
 Total 235,571 2,420 2,187 233 (9.6) 1.03 0.93 −0.10
Procedures designated for 30-day surveillance for SSIs
 Total 123,734 1,250 1,179 71 (5.9) 1.01 0.95 −0.06
  Abdominal aortic aneurysm 451 4 3 1 (25.0) 0.89 0.67 −0.22
  Abdominal hysterectomy 10,713 123 117 6 (4.9) 1.15 1.09 −0.06
  Abdominal proceduresb 3,366 181 166 15 (8.3) 5.38 4.93 −0.45
  Abdominal transplantsc 476 27 27 0 (0) 5.67 5.67 0
  Appendix surgery 9,119 74 73 1 (1.4) 0.81 0.80 −0.01
  Carotid endarterectomy 2,522 10 9 1 (10.0) 0.40 0.36 −0.04
  Cesarean section 16,488 141 141 0 (0) 0.86 0.86 0
  Colon surgery 7,739 248 234 14 (5.7) 3.20 3.02 −0.18
  Exploratory laparotomy 5,011 84 78 6 (7.1) 1.68 1.56 −0.12
  Gallbladder surgery 27,715 81 81 0 (0) 0.29 0.29 0
  Gastric surgery 7,015 59 56 3 (5.1) 0.84 0.80 −0.04
  Kidney surgery 1,206 10 10 0 (0) 0.83 0.83 0
  Laminectomy 9,374 97 84 13 (13.4) 1.03 0.90 −0.13
  Limb amputation 4,973 46 44 2 (4.4) 0.92 0.88 −0.04
  Other (other prosthesis) 2,214 15 6 9 (60.0) 0.68 0.27 −0.41
  Prostate surgery 1,780 1 1 0 (0) 0.06 0.06 0
  Thoracic surgery 2,624 11 11 0 (0) 0.42 0.42 0
  Thyroid and/or parathyroid surgery 4,513 4 4 0 (0) 0.09 0.09 0
  Vaginal hysterectomy 6,435 34 34 0 (0) 0.53 0.53 0
Procedures designated for 90-day surveillance for SSIs
 Total 111,837 1,170 1,008 162 (13.9) 1.05 0.90 −0.15
  Breast 17,468 142 127 15 (10.6) 0.81 0.73 −0.08
  Cardiac surgery 1,062 11 7 4 (36.4) 1.04 0.66 −0.38
  Coronary artery bypass grafting 5,065 68 60 8 (11.8) 1.34 1.18 −0.16
  Craniotomy 1,487 17 17 0 (0) 1.14 1.14 0
  Herniorrhaphy 21,947 169 153 16 (9.5) 0.77 0.70 −0.07
  Hip prosthesis 12,200 181 165 16 (8.8) 1.48 1.35 −0.13
  Knee prosthesis 20,767 203 152 51 (25.1) 0.98 0.73 −0.25
  Open reduction internal fixation 14,361 149 117 32 (21.5) 1.04 0.81 −0.23
  Pacemaker 1,679 1 1 0 (0) 0.06 0.06 0
  Peripheral vascular bypass 1,811 69 62 7 (10.1) 3.81 3.42 −0.39
  Spinal fusion 13,721 158 147 11 (7.0) 1.15 1.07 −0.08
  Ventricular shunt 269 2 0 2 (100) 0.74 0 −0.74
a

Cases per 100 procedures.

b

Bile duct, liver, pancreatic, spleen, small bowel.

c

Kidney, liver.

Among SSIs excluded using the new definition, Staphylococcus aureus (n = 72 [44%]), gram-negative rod bacteria (n = 22 [14%]), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 19 [12%]) were the primary pathogens isolated for SSIs (Table 2). The proportions of excluded SSIs were similar when stratified by hospital procedure volume and by hospital year (data not shown).

TABLE 2.

Primary Pathogens Isolated from Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) Occurring Greater Than 90 Days Postoperatively That Were Excluded by the 2013 SSI Definitions for 90-Day Surveillance Procedures

Primary pathogen SSI diagnosis at 91–180 days SSI diagnosis at >180 days Total
Staphylococcus aureus 51 21 72
Gram-negative rod bacteria 14 8 22
Coagulase-negative staphylococci 5 14 19
No pathogen identified 9 8 17
Streptococci 8 4 12
Other 5 5 10
Enterococci 3 4 7
Yeast 2 1 3
 Total no. of SSIs 97 65 162

NOTE. Ninety-day surveillance procedures include breast surgery, cardiac surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting, craniotomy, herniorrhaphy, hip prosthesis, knee prosthesis, open reduction internal fixation, pacemaker, peripheral vascular bypass, spinal fusion, and ventricular shunt.

DISCUSSION

Application of the 2013 SSI surveillance definitions to our historical surveillance data led to omission of almost 10% of previously identified SSIs. The number of omitted SSIs varied by procedure type. In particular, the 2013 SSI definitions excluded more than 20% of SSIs previously detected by the pre-2013 SSI definitions occurring after joint and bone procedures, including knee arthroplasties, arthroplasties other than knees and hips, and open reduction with internal fixation. Thus, one important effect of the 2013 SSI surveillance definitions will be a decrease in SSI rates that is not due to a change in clinical practice. Interpretation of time-trended SSI rates before and after January 2013 must take this surveillance effect into account.

The pathogens that caused the majority of late-onset SSIs excluded by the 2013 definitions in procedures now undergoing 90-day surveillance are notable. S. aureus and gram-negative rod bacteria are virulent pathogens typically responsible for SSIs occurring early after a procedure.5,9 Detection of these virulent pathogens in SSIs occurring more than 90 days after a procedure goes against traditional teaching about early- versus late-onset SSI. Some of these infections may be due to hematogenous seeding rather than procedural contamination events, but we are unable to differentiate primary SSI versus secondary seeding in this retrospective assessment.

The NHSN updated the SSI surveillance definitions in an attempt to simplify and improve the surveillance process. Surveillance is limited to a maximum of 90 days, and infection preventionists no longer search for whether procedures used implanted materials. Theoretically, SSI surveillance should now be more straightforward, require fewer resources, and generate results that are more precise because surveillance is performed over a shorter period of time. However, experience with the 2013 definitions is needed to determine whether this is true.

This retrospective analysis has limitations. First, our results derive from surveillance data in community hospitals and may not be generalizable to other practice settings. However, we believe our cohort of hospitals to be representative of the typical hospital in the United States. Second, because SSIs are low-frequency events occurring on average 1% of the time, even a 10% or 20% relative reduction in SSI rate amounts to a small absolute reduction in SSI occurrence for a single surgery program. The clinical and infection prevention implications of the SSI definition changes are uncertain.

In summary, use of the 2013 SSI surveillance definitions will lead to omission of almost 10% of previously identified SSIs. Furthermore, rates of SSI following certain procedure types, such as knee prosthesis procedures and open fracture repairs, appear to be more impacted than others by the definition change. Rates of SSI using the 2013 definitions for procedures involving implanted material are not comparable to rates derived using the pre-2013 surveillance definitions.

Acknowledgments

Financial support. D.J.A. was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (K23AI095357).

Footnotes

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article. All authors submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest, and the conflicts that the editors consider relevant to this article are disclosed here.

Presented in part: IDWeek; San Francisco, California; October 2–6, 2013 (abstract).

References

  • 1.Brandt C, Sohr D, Behnke M, Daschner F, Ruden H, Gastmeier P. Reduction of surgical site infection rates associated with active surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27:1347–1351. doi: 10.1086/509843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Geubbels EL, Bakker HG, Houtman P, et al. Promoting quality through surveillance of surgical site infections: five prevention success stories. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:424–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988;16:128–140. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:606–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27:97–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care–associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:309–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event. Atlanta: CDC; 2013. [Accessed July 2013.]. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anderson DJ, Miller BA, Chen LF, et al. The network approach for prevention of healthcare-associated infections: long-term effect of participation in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32:315–322. doi: 10.1086/658940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:195–283. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES