Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2014 Nov 4;5:600. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00600

Assessment of natural variation in the first pore domain of the tomato HKT1;2 transporter and characterization of mutated versions of SlHKT1;2 expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and via complementation of the salt sensitive athkt1;1 mutant

Pedro M F Almeida 1,*, Gert-Jan de Boer 2, Albertus H de Boer 1
PMCID: PMC4219482  PMID: 25408697

Abstract

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) within the coding sequence of HKT transporters are important for the functioning of these transporters in several plant species. To unravel the functioning of HKT transporters analysis of natural variation and multiple site-directed mutations studies are crucial. Also the in vivo functioning of HKT proteins, via complementation studies performed with athkt1;1 plants, could provide essential information about these transporters. In this work, we analyzed the natural variation present in the first pore domain of the HKT1;2 coding sequence of 93 different tomato accessions, which revealed that this region was conserved among all accessions analyzed. Analysis of mutations introduced in the first pore domain of the SlHKT1;2 gene showed, when heterologous expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, that the replacement of S70 by a G allowed SlHKT2;1 to transport K+, but also caused a large reduction in both Na+ and K+ mediated currents. The study of the transport characteristics of SlHKT1;2 revealed that Na+-transport by the tomato SlHKT1;2 protein was inhibited by the presence of K+ at the outside of the membrane. GUS expression under the AtHKT1;1 promoter gave blue staining in the vascular system of transgenic Arabidopsis. athkt1;1 mutant plants transformed with AtHKT1;1, SlHKT1;2, AtHKT1;1S68G, and SlHKT1;2S70G indicated that both AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 were able to restore the accumulation of K+ in the shoot, although the low accumulation of Na+ as shown by WT plants was only partially restored. The inhibition of Na+ transport by K+, shown by the SlHKT1;2 transporter in oocytes (and not by AtHKT1;1), was not reflected in Na+ accumulation in the plants transformed with SlHKT1;2. Both AtHKT1;1-S68G and SlHKT1;2-S70G were not able to restore the phenotype of athkt1;1 mutant plants.

Keywords: natural variation, tomato, HKT1 genes, mutation, pore domain

Introduction

Salinity stress negatively affects crop yield (Munns and Tester, 2008). In order to sustain the growing human population it is necessary to increase the salt tolerance of crop plants, as the human population is growing faster than the area of agricultural land (FAO, 2009). To tolerate salinity plants rely on three different mechanisms: osmotic tolerance, ionic tolerance and Na+ exclusion from the shoots (Munns and Tester, 2008). Na+ exclusion from the shoots is the most studied and best understood mechanism, therefore, it is a promising candidate for an approach of genetic modification to enhance plant salt tolerance (Plett et al., 2010).

HKT transporters are often studied with regard to Na+ exclusion from the shoots. HKT transporters belong to a superfamily of transporters including bacterial KtrBs transporters (Tholema et al., 1999) and yeast TRKs transporters (Rodriguez-Navarro, 2000). The HKT gene family is divided in two classes based on their gene structure and in the presence of either a glycine (G) or a serine (S) residue in the first pore domain of the transporter (Maser et al., 2002). Members of class 1 have an S at this position, whereas members of class 2, with the exception of OsHKT2;1, have a G at this position (Platten et al., 2006). HKT transporters are implicated in Na+ transport in wheat (Davenport et al., 2005; James et al., 2006; Byrt et al., 2007; Munns et al., 2012), rice (Ren et al., 2005; Horie et al., 2007; Jabnoune et al., 2009) and Arabidopsis (Uozumi et al., 2000; Berthomieu et al., 2003; Rus et al., 2004; Sunarpi et al., 2005; Moller et al., 2009). Class I HKT transporters are low affinity transporters with specificity for Na+ (Munns and Tester, 2008). Some of these members are located at the plasma membrane of root stele cells, in particular in the xylem parenchyma cells (XPC). They function in retrieving Na+ from the xylem sap, and prevent Na+ from reaching the shoots and damaging photosynthetic cells. The number of class I HKT members varies between mono- and dicotyledonous plants (Garciadeblas et al., 2003; Ren et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2006; Jabnoune et al., 2009). When first characterized, athkt1;1 and wild type (WT) seedlings showed no difference in root and shoot growth after growing 6 days in a medium with (150 mM) or without NaCl (Rus et al., 2004). However, on the long term medium supplemented with 75 mM NaCl reduced the shoot growth and increased tip senescence of mature leaves of athkt1;1 mutants (Rus et al., 2004). Due to the higher Na+ accumulation in the shoots, athkt1;1 mutant plants display Na+ sensitivity, showing the role of HKT transporters in preventing Na+ from reaching the shoots (Rus et al., 2001, 2004; Berthomieu et al., 2003; Sunarpi et al., 2005).

The discovery of genetic polymorphisms in HKT genes (Diatloff et al., 1998; Rubio et al., 1999; Ren et al., 2005; Cotsaftis et al., 2012) underlying the adaptation to salinity stress brought new insights in the understanding of the functions of genes involved in the adaptation mechanisms. Information on genetic polymorphisms in HKT genes will provide tools for the development of crops more tolerant to salinity stress. Within the same genus, the diversity of phenotypes across environmental gradients of stress can indicate the suitability for selection, and the study of the genotypes responsible for those phenotypes might lead to the discovery of genetic polymorphisms responsible for these adaptive responses (Baxter et al., 2010). Analysis of OsHKT1;5 in two rice cultivars differing in their salinity tolerance showed that both the cellular location and expression patterns of OsHKT1;5 were identical. Nevertheless, differences in the coding region producing four amino acid substitutions were linked to the functional variation of these two alleles (Ren et al., 2005). Recently, it was concluded that the V395L substitution present in Nona Bokra could directly affect the Na+ transport rates and that it was responsible for the tolerant and sensitive behavior of Nona Bokra and Koshihikari, respectively (Cotsaftis et al., 2012).

Besides natural variation, studies of single (Diatloff et al., 1998; Maser et al., 2002) or multiple (Kato et al., 2007) site-directed mutations of HKT transporters (Diatloff et al., 1998; Maser et al., 2002; Kato et al., 2007) are also crucial to understand how these transporters function. The replacement of the S by a G in the first pore domain of AtHKT1;1 changed AtHKT1;1 from a Na+ uniporter to a Na+/K+ symporter (Maser et al., 2002).

Data on the role of HKT transporters is often generated from heterologous expression of HKT transporters in, mainly, Xenopus laevis oocytes (Schachtman and Schroeder, 1994; Fairbairn et al., 2000; Uozumi et al., 2000; Horie et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2001; Golldack et al., 2002; Berthomieu et al., 2003; Su et al., 2003; Ren et al., 2005; Jabnoune et al., 2009; Lan et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2010; Horie et al., 2011) and, to a lesser extent, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells (Horie et al., 2001, 2011; Golldack et al., 2002; Garciadeblas et al., 2003; Su et al., 2003; Takahashi et al., 2007; Ali et al., 2012). However, in a report by Haro et al. (2005) a very important question was addressed: are results obtained for HKT transporters when expressed in heterologous systems of physiological importance in planta? Or, are heterologous expression systems too artificial to have physiological meaning in planta? We performed several experiments to investigate if there is natural variation present in the first pore domain of HKT1;2 in tomato and how the replacement of the S residue by a G residue in the first pore domain in HKT1;2 of tomato affects the function of the transporter when expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Moreover, we investigated if the results obtained with Xenopus oocytes could be replicated in planta.

In this study we analyzed the presence of natural variation in the first pore domain of HKT1;2 of 93 tomato accessions. We also replaced the S residue of the first pore domain of SlHKT1;2 with a G residue, and we analyzed the effect of this mutation via expression of these mutated genes in Xenopus laevis oocytes. We generated stable lines of Arabidopsis thaliana athkt1;1 plants expressing each of these constructs, and we characterized their biomass production, shoot water-content and ion content after 2 weeks of salt treatment.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Genomic DNA used in this experiment was extracted from 93 different tomato accessions (Supplementary File Table 1). Tomato seeds were surface sterilized by soaking in 1% (V/V) commercial sodium hypochlorite solution for 15 min and rinsed three times with sterile water. After sterilization, seeds were sown in rock wool plugs soaked with half-strength Hoagland solution (one seed per rock wool plug). Plugs were covered with dry vermiculite to avoid dehydration. A randomized design consisting of three biological replicates and 93 different accessions was used. Each biological replica consisted of a pool of seven to 10 plants. On alternate days plants were irrigated with half-strength Hoagland solution. Plants were kept in a climate chamber under a 14/10 h photoperiod and a 20/18°C day/night temperature. Plants were harvested after 5 weeks. Seeds of homozygous athkt1;1 mutant (Columbia-0) were obtained from the NASC stock center (N6531) and were sown along with WT Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0. Plants were grown on a mix of sand and peat (1:1) at 24°C in a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle in a greenhouse. Plants were watered every 2 days. Selected transgenic lines (See the section “Cloning of HKT genes and generation of Arabidopsis transgenic lines” for a full description of how these lines were generated) were grown under the same conditions. Four-week old transgenic lines (T2 lines) were treated with 100 mM NaCl every 2 days during 2 weeks before harvesting of shoot material.

Genomic DNA extraction

For the extraction of genomic DNA approximately 25 mg of dried root material of each tomato accession was weighed and inserted in a 96 deep well plate. Samples were freeze dried for 1 week using a freeze dryer (Christ Alpha 1-4 LD plus, Germany). For the extraction of DNA a Nucleospin 96 Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) was used and the manufacturer's protocol was followed. The quality of the gDNA was checked on a 1.5% agarose gel. The concentration of the gDNA was calculated using the Quanti-iTTM PicoGREEN dsDNA assay kit (Invitrogen). gDNA was diluted in TE buffer pH 8.0 (10 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA) and stored at 4°C.

Primer and probe design and analysis of natural variation

Primers and probes (Supplementary File Table 2) were designed to have a Tm between 60 and 67°C with DNASIS MAX v3.0 software. Pairs of primers were designed to flank the SNP under study. The size of amplicons was designed to be smaller than 150 nucleotides. Unlabeled probes were blocked at the 3′ end to prevent extension in PCR reactions and designed to anneal over an SNP of interest. Reactions were performed in 384-well plates. 20 ng of gDNA per sample were used to study natural variation in tomato HKT1;2 nucleotides of different cultivars. Per reaction, 3.21 μl of MilliQ, 0.05 μl of FW primer (10 μmol/μl) and 0.25 μl RV primer (10 μmol/μl), 0.04 μl of PAL (5 U/μl) (KAPA Biosystems, Boston, USA), 0.25 μl LC Green (Idaho Technology, Salt Lake City, USA), 0.20 μl dNTP (5 mM) and 1 μl PAL buffer (KAPA Biosystems, Boston, USA) supplemented with 12.5 mM MgCl2, were added. The amplification reaction started with a denaturation step of 95°C for 10 min and continued with 14 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 4 min. Samples were cooled to room temperature and a first melting curve analysis was performed to assess the quality of the amplification. Samples were again cooled down to room temperature and 2 μl (10 pmol/μl) of probe was added. Samples were heated up to 96°C for 3 min and cooled down to room temperature before analyzing the melting curve of the probe. The mix of PCR products and probes was heated up to 96°C for 3 min and then cooled down to room temperature to allow hetero-duplex formation. Thereafter, the mix of PCR products and probes was re-heated to 95°C at 0.3°C/s. Data were acquired between 50 and 95°C. Data acquisition was made with a Light Scanner HR384 (Idaho Technology Inc. Salt Lake City, USA). High Resolution Melting (HRM) curve analysis was performed using the “Unlabeled Probes” module in the “genotyping” mode of the software. This mode involves negative filter, normalization and grouping. SlHKT1;2 coding sequence isolated from S. lycopersicum Arbasson F1 was used as a reference. Amplicons that showed a melting curve different from the reference melting-curve were selected, amplified and sequenced. Sequencing of the amplicons was performed at Macrogen Europe Laboratories, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Plasmid construction

Site-directed mutagenesis of SlHKT1;2 was conducted using overlap extension PCR. All primers used to make mutated HKT1 genes are listed in (Supplementary File Table 3). pGEM-HESphI+SlHKT1;2 and pGEM-HESphI+AtHKT1;1 (see Almeida et al., 2014 for a full description of how these constructs were obtained) were used as template and the corresponding mutated gene cloned into the BamHI and XbaI restriction sites and SphI and BamHI restriction sites of an empty pGEM-HESphI vector for tomato and Arabidopsis HKT1, respectively. The constructs obtained were called pGEM-HESphI+AtHKT1;1-S68G and pGEM-HESphI+SlHKT1;2-S70G. All PCR-derived DNA-fragments were confirmed by sequencing.

Heterologous expression of HKT1 genes in Xenopus laevis oocytes

Preparation of template DNA, in vitro transcription and capping of mRNA and Two-electrode voltage clamping of Xenopus oocytes was performed according to Almeida et al. (2014). All measurements were performed at least 3 times on oocytes isolated from two different batches.

Cloning of HKT genes, generation of Arabidopsis transgenic lines and GUS staining

The pGEM-HE vector used in this work was modified to contain the SphI restriction site. This restriction site was introduced between the BamHI and XbaI restriction sites present in the vector. This was made by designing two complementary primers containing the SphI restriction site flanked by both BamHI and XbaI restriction sites, and introducing this piece of DNA between the BamHI and XbaI restriction sites of pGEM-HE vector. The pGEM-HE vector containing this new restriction site was selected and used in this work. To be able to distinguish the original pGEM-HE and pGEM-HE containing the SphI restriction site, we called our vector pGEM-HESphI.

pGEM-HESphI+AtHKT1;1, pGEM-HESphI+AtHKT1;1-S68G, pGEM-HESphI+SlHKT1;2, and pGEM-HESphI+SlHKT1;2-S70G were used as template in the amplification of the HKT genes flanked by the attB Gateway (Invitrogen) recombination sites. The AtHKT1;1, AtHKT1;1-S68G, SlHKT1;2, and SlHKT1;2-S70G genes were cloned into the pDONR221 P5-P2 vector (Invitrogen) and were named p5-2AtHKT1;1, p5-2AtHKT1;1-S68G, p5-2SlHKT1;2, and p5-2SlHKT1;2-S70G, respectively. A 5 kb DNA fragment upstream of the ATG start codon of the AtHKT1;1 gene containing the promoter region, the tandem repeat and the small RNA target region (Baek et al., 2011) was cloned into pDONR221 P1-P5 and pDONR221 P1–P2 (Invitrogen) and the resultant constructs were named p1-5AtHKT1;1prom, p1-2AtHKT1;1prom, respectively. Cloning of DNA fragments into pDONR221 (Invitrogen) vectors was performed by BP reactions (Invitrogen). Cloning of either AtHKT or SlHKT genes into pHGW (Karimi et al., 2002) under the AtHKT1;1 promoter was performed by LR reactions (Invitrogen). In this way, pHGW+AtHKT1;1prom+AtHKT1;1, pHGW+AtHKT1;1prom+AtHKT1;1-S68G, pHGW+AtHKT1;1prom+SlHKT1;2, and pHGW+AtHKT1;1prom+SlHKT1;2-S70G constructs were created. p1-2AtHKT1;1prom was incubated with pKGWFS7 (Karimi et al., 2002) in an LR reaction (Invitrogen) to create the pKGWFS7+AtHKT1;1prom construct. All constructs were sequenced prior to the transformation of Arabidopsis plants. All primers used are listed (Supplementary File Table 4). All constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101pMP90, including the pHGW empty vector, and transformed into 3-week old athkt1-1 mutant plants, except pKGWFS7+AtHKT1;1prom and the pKGWFS7 empty vector, which were transformed into 3-week old Arabidopsis WT plants. Plant transformation was performed by the flower dipping method (Clough and Bent, 1998). athkt1;1 mutant plants (N6531) (Rus et al., 2001) were transformed with pHGW+AtHKT1;1prom+AtHKT1;1 or pHGW+AtHKT1;1prom+AtHKT1;1-S68G or pHGW+AtHKT1;1prom+SlHKT1;2 or pHGW+AtHKT1;1prom+SlHKT1;2-S70G. Arabidopsis WT plants were transformed with pKGWFS7+AtHKT1;1prom or pKGWFS7 empty vector. Four weeks after transformation, seeds were harvested and surface sterilized. Surface sterilization was performed by washing seeds during 1 min with a 80% ethanol solution with 0.1% Tween-20, followed by a 20 min washing step with 1% commercial bleach, and three washing steps with sterile MilliQ. MilliQ was then replaced by warm half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1% sucrose, 0.8% agar and 10 mg/L hygromycin or 50 mg/L kanamycin. Seeds were placed in round plates containing solid MS medium with the same composition. Seedlings showing hygromycin or kanamycin resistance were selected and transferred to pots containing a mix of soil and peat (1:1). They were grown for 4 weeks under the growing conditions described above, after which the seeds were harvested. T2 seeds were tested for antibiotic resistance and used to either investigate their growth response under different NaCl concentrations or for GUS staining. Histochemical assays of GUS activity (biological replicates n = 3) were conducted using samples that were stained according to Jefferson et al. (1987). Seven days old plantlets (plantlets n = 7) were incubated at 37°C for 6 h in the staining solution containing 0.5 mM X-Gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-b-D-glucoronide).

Analysis of transcripts levels

Tissue specific expression of all HKT genes was tested by extracting total RNA from roots and leaves of three-week old WT and transformed Arabidopsis lines. RNA from transformed plants was extracted and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA extraction was performed using the Innuprep Plant RNA kit (Westburg, the Netherlands). First strand cDNA was synthesized using one microgram of total RNA, random hexamers and SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies). First strand cDNA was used as a template for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Samples were measured from each transformed plant using a sequence detector system (7300 Real Time PCR System from Applied Biosystems). Primers used to test the expression of AtHKT1;1 and AtHKT1;1-S68G according to (Jha et al., 2010). Primers used to test the expression of SlHKT1;2 and SlHKT1;2-S70G according to Asins et al. (2012). ß-Actin transcript levels were used as an internal standard. The mean normalized expression was calculated according to Livak and Schmittgen (2001).

Statistical analyses of data

Two-way ANOVA was used to assess the effect of salt treatment on HKT1 gene expression, fresh weight, Na+ and K+ accumulation. Normality and homogeneity assumptions were checked. Gene expression data were rank-transformed if these assumptions were violated. If ANOVA was significant, a post hoc test (Tukey's test) was used to evaluate differences among treatment and plant lines. All tests were performed using SPSS 17.0.

Sequence data

The SlHKT1;2 sequence used in this study has the EMBL/GenBank accession number HG530660 (Almeida et al., 2014).

Results

SLHKT1;2 S70 is conserved throughout Solanum accessions

From all 93 tomato accessions tested only three (PI 126435, LA 2931 and LA 1401) showed different melting curves (Figure 1A). To identify whether the SNPs responsible for these different melting curves were located at our target region, we amplified and sequenced the region of the first pore domain of these three accessions (Figure 1B). Sequencing results revealed that each of these three accessions have a single SNP (PI 126435 and LA 1401 have the same SNP and LA 2931 has a different SNP), although none of them in the position of interest. The SNP in the accession LA 2931 resulted in an amino acid change from valine (V) to isoleucine (I); however, both amino acids are hydrophobic. In the case of accessions PI 126435 and LA 1401 the SNP did not result in any amino acid change, as both ACA and ACT code for a threonine (T) residue.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Tomato accessions show SNPs close to the S at the filter position of the first pore domain, but not in the nucleotides coding the S residue. (A) Solanum HKT1;2 melting curve derivative plots from 93 tomato accessions showing the two different SNP's identified close to the 1st pore domain. (B) Nucleotide sequences of the HKT1;2 gene of different Solanum accessions show that both SNPs (red letters) situate close to, but do not coincide with the S70 residue of the first pore domain (green letters). Black colored letters represent conserved nucleotides.

Site-directed mutagenesis of S70 to G of SLHKT1;2

To test the hypothesis that S70 of the tomato SlHKT1;2 protein is crucial for the Na+ selectivity we replaced S70 by a G (SlHKT1;2-S70G). cRNA of SlHKT1;2-S70G was injected in Xenopus laevis oocytes. After 2 days of incubation, currents produced in the presence of Na+ and K+ ions were recorded in oocytes expressing both WT and mutated HKT1 transporters from Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum (n = 3) (Figure 2). AtHKT1;1-S68G expressing oocytes (Maser et al., 2002) were used as a positive control of SlHKT1;2-S70G. Currents produced by oocytes expressing either AtHKT1;1 (Figure 2A) or SlHKT1;2 (Figure 2I) increased when the oocytes were bathed in higher Na+ concentrations (as seen by a more negative current). Increasing external K+ concentration did not result in any change in the current levels produced by AtHKT1;1 expressing oocytes (Figure 2B). In contrast, SlHKT1;2 mediated inward and outward currents were sensitive to external K+ concentration as both currents decreased with increasing bath K+ concentration (Figure 2J). Increased concentrations of K+ result in an inhibition on the transport of Na+ by SlHKT1;2 but not by AtHKT1;1. When oocytes expressing either AtHKT1;1-S68G or SlHKT1;2-S70G were bathed with either increasing Na+ concentration (Figures 2E,M) or K+ concentration (Figures 2F,N) currents increased for both cations tested. For both AtHKT1;1- and SlHKT1;2-mediated currents a higher Na+ concentration but not a higher K+ concentration resulted in positive shifts in the reversal potential (Figures 2C,K), which is indicative of Na+ permeation. Reversal potentials obtained with oocytes expressing either AtHKT1;1-S68G (Figure 2G) or SlHKT1;2-S70G (Figure 2O) showed positive shifts when both Na+ concentration or K+ concentration increased, indicating that the presence of a G residue at the filter position of the first pore domain allows the transport of both Na+ and K+ ions. Figures 2D,H,L,P show the currents recorded at −140 mV for AtHKT1;1, AtHKT1;1-S68G, SlHKT1;2 and SlHKT1;2-S70G, respectively. These results show that the Na+-mediated current of SlHKT1;2 is reduced by increased concentrations of K+ in the bath. The presence of K+ ions affects the transport of Na+ by SlHKT1;2. This effect is not observed with AtHKT1;1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Transport activity of AtHKT1;1, AtHKT1;1-S68G, SlHKT1;2 and SlHKT1;2-S70G constructs expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Oocytes were injected with AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 and the indicated mutated transporters. (A,E,I,M) Currents recorded at three Na+ concentrations (1, 3, and 10 mM) with 1 mM K+ as background; (B,F,J,N) Currents recorded at three K+ concentrations (1, 3, and 10 mM) with 1 mM Na+ as background; (C,G,K,O) Reversal potential shifts as a function of ion concentration. Only transporters where the S of the 1st pore domain was mutated to a G were permeable to K+ as indicated by the large positive shifts in the reversal potential with increasing concentrations of K+ in the bath; (D,H,L,P) Absolute currents as a function of ion concentration. Transporters where the S of the 1st pore domain was mutated to a G showed an increase in current with increasing K+ concentration in the bath. Data are means ± SE (n = 3, experiments done with at least two different oocyte batches).

Selection and molecular analysis of T2 plants and GUS expression in A. thaliana under the A. thaliana HKT1;1

HKT1 gene expression was analyzed in T2 Arabidopsis plantlets carrying the SlHKT1;2 or AtHKT1;1, SlHKT1;2-S70G, or AtHKT1;1-S68G genes (data not shown). All genes were expressed under the AtHKT1;1 endogenous promoter. All lines tested showed HKT1 expression levels higher than the athkt1;1 (N6531) mutant plants. Expression of AtHKT1;1 was not detected in athkt1;1 mutant plants. The 5 kb AtHKT1;1 promoter fragment was able to drive the expression of GUS in the vascular tissues of transformed Arabidopsis WT plants (Figure 3). GUS activity driven by AtHKT1;1 promoter was only observed in the vascular tissues of leaves of transgenic Arabidopsis plants (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Detection of GUS activity in the vascular system of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Arabidopsis plants expressed the GUS gene under the control of the AtHKT1;1 promoter were grown. Strong blue GUS staining was detected in the vicinity of the xylem and phloem in leaves. Arrows point to the xylem vessels. Biological replicates, n = 3; plantlets, n = 7.

Analysis of FW, Na+, and K+ accumulation of transgenic Arabidopsis lines

There was a marked difference in K+-sensitivity of Na+-transport mediated by the AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 proteins, as analyzed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. To see whether this difference was reflected in Na+/K+ homeostasis in planta, we expressed the AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 genes driven by a 5 kb long AtHKT1;1 promoter in the athkt1;1 mutant plants and studied how they complemented the mutant phenotype. Since the analysis of SlHKT1;2-S70G and AtHKT1;1-S68G in Xenopus oocytes showed interesting effects on transport activity and ion selectivity we transformed athkt1;1 plants with SlHKT1;2-S70G and AtHKT1-S68G, and tested the functioning of these mutated genes in planta during salinity stress. Figure 4 shows the effect of salinity treatment on the leaf fresh weight of WT plants, athkt1;1 mutants and transformed plants. athkt1;1-mutant plants were more sensitive to salt than the WT plants. Both the AtHKT1;1 and the SlHKT1;2 gene were able to complement the athkt1;1 mutant growth-phenotype on salt (Figure 4). Plants transformed with SlHKT1;2-S70G or AtHKT1-S68G were just as sensitive to salt as the athkt1;1-mutant plants. The analysis of the relative water content of the leaves did not show statistically significant differences between control and salt treated plants (data not shown) nor within transformed lines. The effect of the athkt1;1 mutation on Na+ and K+ homeostasis was pronounced (Figure 5). The athkt1;1 plants accumulated almost four-fold more Na+ and two-fold less K+, resulting in an eight-fold higher Na+/K+-ratio in the shoot of the mutant plants as compared to the WT plants. The transgenic lines that complemented the athkt1;1 growth-phenotype (AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2) showed effects on ion accumulation: the athkt1;1 K+-phenotype during salt stress (i.e., strong reduction in K+ accumulation) was completely restored, but Na+ accumulation in the leaves of these transgenic lines was still significantly higher than that of the WT plants.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Presence of 100 mM NaCl in the irrigation water during 2 weeks significantly reduced the fresh weight of transformed, WT and athkt1;1 (N6531) Arabidopsis plants in comparison to control plants irrigated with water not supplemented with NaCl. Different inhibitions on the fresh weight production are observed amongst different transformed plant lines. Arabidopsis WT and athkt1;1 plants were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Treatment: p < 0.05; plant lines: p < 0.05; treatment*plant lines (n.s.); Two-Way ANOVA. Values indicate the means ± SE of three to seven biological replicates.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Differences in ion accumulation between all plants analyzed. Na+ (A) and K+ (B) accumulation and Na+/K+ (C) ratio in the shoot of WT, athkt1;1 mutant (N6531) and transgenic lines expressing different HKT1 genes. Na+/K+ ratio was normalized for WT. The effect of the mutation in the AtHKT1;1 gene is very clear, showing a strong increase in shoot Na+ accompanied by a decrease in K+, which resulted in a very strong increase in the Na+/K+ ratio. Both lines expressing AtHKT1;1::AtHKT1;1 or AtHKT1;1::SlHKT1;2 were able to reduce the accumulation of Na+ and increase the accumulation of K+ in comparison to athkt1;1. Lines expressing AtHKT1;1::AtHKT1;1-S68G or AtHKT1;1::SlHKT1;2-S70G were not able to ameliorate the phenotype of the athkt1;1 plants. Different letters above bars indicate statistically significant differences. Values indicate the means ± SE of three to seven biological replicates.

Discussion

Several studies have shown that naturally occurring SNPs in genes involved in Na+ and K+ homeostasis can have a dramatic effect on the salinity tolerance of several plant species. This is the case for HKT transporters (Rubio et al., 1995; Ren et al., 2005; Baxter et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2012; Cotsaftis et al., 2012). Due to the effects of SNPs on the transport properties of HKT proteins, and consequently the effect of these SNPs on the salinity tolerance of the plants, we decided to study the presence/absence of SNPs in the sequence of the first pore domain of the HKT1;2 gene of several tomato accessions (Figure 1). The first pore domain in all accessions studied showed an S, which is naturally occurring in AtHKT1;1, implying that if during evolution the amino acid residue that we studied would have changed, these changes were not in favor of salinity tolerance of the tomato plants and, therefore, did not persist (Diatloff et al., 1998).

The analysis of the properties of the heterologous expressed SlHKT1;2 showed that the transport characteristics were in accordance with the presence of an S in the first pore domain of the transporter (Figure 2). This is reflected in the SlHKT1;2 transport characteristics as measured in heterologous expression, where it was shown that tomato HKT1;2 transports Na+ but not K+ (Almeida et al., 2014). However, a striking difference between the transport properties of AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 expressed in oocytes was observed when currents were measured at constant Na+ in the bath (1 mM) and increasing K+ (1, 3, and 10 mM). Whereas the AtHKT1;1 mediated current was virtually insensitive to higher K+, the SlHKT1;2 mediated current decreased by 60% at 10 mM K+ (Figure 2). A similar inhibitory action of K+ on HKT-mediated currents was reported for OsHKT2;1 (Jabnoune et al., 2009) and for TmHKT1;5-A (Munns et al., 2012). It was proposed that this inhibition is caused by the association of K+ to the Na+ binding region within the pore region of HKT transporters (Rubio et al., 1995; Gassmann et al., 1996). This inhibition has not been observed with AtHKT1;1 (Uozumi et al., 2000) nor OsHKT1;5 (Ren et al., 2005) in Xenopus oocytes, which indicates that the K+-sensitivity of these transporters is different from OsHKT2;1, TmHKT1;5-A and tomato SlHKT1;2. Physiologically, this K+-induced reduction of Na+-influx might mean that the tomato plants maintain a certain K+/Na+-homeostasis in the transpiration sap. High concentrations of K+ in the xylem sap might imply a reduced Na+-uptake into the XPC, as the Na+/K+ ratio is in favor of Na+. On the other hand, low concentrations of K+ and high concentrations of Na+ in the xylem sap imply an induced Na+-uptake into the XPC, as the Na+/K+ ratio is in favor of K+ in the xylem sap. In this model, the Na+/K+ ratio is more important than the absolute concentration of Na+ in the xylem sap in determining the Na+ uptake into the XPC by HKT1 (Figure 6). Although the S → G mutation in the first pore domain of both the AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 protein had an effect on the ion selectivity of both transporters, as deduced from the shift in reversal potential at increasing external K+ (Figure 2), a major difference observed was the reduction in total current transported by SlHKT1;2-S70G and AtHKT1-S68G, which was 95 and 78% respectively of that transported by the WT proteins at 10 mM Na+ and 1 mM K+ in the bath (Figure 2). The reason for this difference is unclear as the results we obtained do not match the results of the Na+ currents produced by AtHKT1;1-S68G reported by Maser et al. (2002). Their results did not show this reduction in total currents. Interestingly, when Maser et al. (2002) mutated AtHKT1;1 in M69L, a reduction in outward currents with increasing K+ concentrations in the bath was observed, whereas in TaHKT1;2 the reverse mutation, L92M, abolished this inhibitory effect of K+ on outward currents (Maser et al., 2002). In their work, the leucine (L) adjacent to the G of the pore domain seems to confer K+ sensitivity to outward currents in contrast with the methionine (M) at that same position, which abolished the effect of K+ on Na+ currents (Maser et al., 2002). Since in our study SlHKT1;2 has a M adjacent to the G of the pore domain, no sensitivity of outward currents was expected due to increasing K+ concentrations in the bath. Nevertheless, in our study we observed outward currents, mediated by SlHKT1;2, sensitive to external K+. In a future study it would be interesting to mutate SlHKT1;2-M71L, to check whether the presence of a L adjacent to the S of the first pore domain of SlHKT1;2 enhances or decreases this inhibitory effect of external K+ on the outward Na+-currents mediated by SlHKT1;2.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Model depicting the difference in K+-sensitivity of SlHKT1;2 from S. esculentum and AtHKT1;1 from Arabidopsis. When the K+-concentration in the xylem sap is high, Na+-uptake by the SlHKT1;2 transporter is reduced. As a result the amount of Na+ in the xylem stream reaching the shoot of tomato is, at least partially, controlled by SlHKT1;2, which in turn depends on the concentration of K+ present in the xylem sap. In Arabidopsis, Na+-uptake in the XPCs by the AtHKT1;1 transporter is not affected by high K+.

ATHKT1;1 and SLHKT1;2 expressing lines

All plant lines studied showed a reduction in fresh weight caused by the salt treatment, and as expected the salt-induced growth reduction was stronger in the athkt1;1-mutant plants than in WT plants. With respect to growth on salt, AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 expression complemented the mutant, since the fresh weight of these lines was comparable to that of WT plants treated with salt and significantly higher than the growth of athkt1;1 plants (Figure 4). Although expression of AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 completely restored the concentration of K+ in the shoot to the same level of the WT plants, Na+ levels were still higher in AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2-expressing lines in comparison to WT plants. Both AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 expressing lines accumulated significantly less Na+ than the other transgenic lines, but significantly more Na+ than the WT plants. This indicates that in these two transgenic lines both HKT1 genes do not retrieve the same amount of Na+ from the xylem as WT plants. This difference in Na+ accumulation in lines expressing AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 in comparison to WT plants is surprising. In this study we used the native AtHKT1;1 promoter (Baek et al., 2011) to drive the expression of all genes studied, avoiding non-native promoters as these are frequently referred to as the cause of unexpected results (Cominelli and Tonelli, 2010). The expression of GUS driven by the native AtHKT1;1 promoter (Figure 3) showed that the expression patterns were similar to previous results (Sunarpi et al., 2005) and also the level of HKT-expression in the different transgenic lines was comparable to that in WT plants.

When expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 differed in two ways: first, SlHKT1;2 but not AtHKT1;1 showed an inhibition of Na+ transport by K+, and second, the total Na+-mediated current (i.e., the turn-over) measured in SlHKT1;2 expressing oocytes was considerably higher than the total Na+-mediated current in AtHKT1;1 expressing oocytes (Figure 2). The latter conclusion needs further testing, since it is based on the assumption that injection of the same amount of cRNA results in the same amount of protein expressed in the plasma membrane. However, it is clear that in these two transgenic lines both HKT1 transporters are involved in the retrieval of Na+ ions from the xylem, as previously demonstrated for HKT1 transporters from several species (Liu et al., 2001; Laurie et al., 2002; Berthomieu et al., 2003; Garciadeblas et al., 2003; Ren et al., 2005; Horie et al., 2007; Jabnoune et al., 2009; Moller et al., 2009; Baxter et al., 2010; Plett et al., 2010; Baek et al., 2011; Mian et al., 2011; Ali et al., 2012; Munns et al., 2012).

As shown in Figure 5, mutating the athkt1;1 gene not only results in an increase in shoot Na+ concentration, but also in a strong reduction in shoot K+ levels. This effect on K+-accumulation has been reported before (Rus et al., 2004, 2005), but a good explanation for this effect is missing thus far. Moller et al. (2009) reported that the increase in K+ concentration in the shoots from plants over-expressing AtHKT1;1, was a pleiotropic effect and a consequence of the reduced Na+ shoot content. Another explanation is that the uptake of Na+ from the xylem into the XPCs via HKT1 results in the depolarization of the membrane potential of XPCs and activation of the depolarization activated K+-efflux channel SKOR, resulting in more K+ release into the xylem (Sunarpi et al., 2005). A third explanation might be that AtHKT1;1 functionally interacts with a K+-efflux transporter in the plasma membrane of XPCs. Support for this hypothesis is found in a recently published large-scale membrane interaction screen based on a yeast mating split-ubiquitin system (mbSUS) (Membrane-based Interactome Network Database, MIND: http://cas-biodb.cas.unt.edu/project/mind/index.php). In this screen, AtHKT1;1 was reported to interact with KEA3, a putative K+-efflux antiporter and member of the Proton Antiporter-2 (CPA2) family. However, this needs to be confirmed in planta in order to provide an explanation for the K+-phenotype of the athkt1;1 mutant. The absence of the AtHKT1;1 protein in the plasma membrane of XPCs of athkt1;1 plants may have a negative effect on the KEA3 antiporter, resulting in reduced root to shoot K+-transport. These hypotheses are certainly worth testing in view of the importance of Na+/K+-homeostasis during salinity stress.

In conclusion, the analysis of the presence of SNPs in the first pore domain of the HKT1;2 gene in 93 tomato accessions showed that this amino acid is conserved in all these accessions. The replacement of S70 by a G in SlHKT1;2 proved to be sufficient to alter the transport specificity of this transporter, as analyzed by heterologous expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Moreover, when expressed under the AtHKT1;1 native promoter, both AtHKT1;1 and SlHKT1;2 partially complemented the Na+ accumulation phenotype and fully complemented the K+ accumulation phenotype of athkt1;1 mutant plants. AtHKT1;1-S68G and SlHKT1;2-S70G were unable to complement either the Na+ or the K+ phenotype of athkt1;1 mutant plants. The transport activity of mutated HKT proteins, measured in Xenopus oocytes, was not reflected in altered Na+/K+-homeostasis of the athkt1;1 mutants grown under soil conditions.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Enza Zaden The Netherlands for the financial support. We thank the reviewers for their valuable comments, which helped to improve this manuscript.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00600/abstract

Click here for additional data file. (21.3KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (17.1KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (18.8KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (20.6KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (159.1KB, TIF)

References

  1. Ali Z., Park H. C., Ali A., Oh D. H., Aman R., Kropornicka A., et al. (2012). TsHKT1;2, a HKT1 homolog from the extremophile Arabidopsis relative Thellungiella salsuginea, shows K+ specificity in the presence of NaCl. Plant Physiol. 158, 1463–1474. 10.1104/pp.111.193110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida P., de Boer G., de Boer A. H. (2014). Differences in shoot Na+ accumulation between two tomato species are due to differences in ion affinity of HKT1;2. J. Plant Physiol. 171, 438–447. 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asins J. M., Villalta I., Aly M. M., Olias R., Morales P. A., Huertas R., et al. (2012). Two closely linked tomato HKT coding genes are positional candidates for the major tomato QTL involved in Na+/K+ homeostasis. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1171–1191. 10.1111/pce.12051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baek D., Jiang J. F., Chung J. S., Wang B. S., Chen J. P., Xin Z. G., et al. (2011). Regulated AtHKT1;1 gene expression by a distal enhancer element and DNA methylation in the promoter plays an important role in salt tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol. 52, 149–161. 10.1093/pcp/pcq182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baxter I., Brazelton J. N., Yu D. N., Huang Y. S., Lahner B., Yakubova E., et al. (2010). A coastal cline in sodium accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana is eriven by natural variation of the sodium transporter AtHKT1;1. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001193 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berthomieu P., Conejero G., Nublat A., Brackenbury W. J., Lambert C., Savio C., et al. (2003). Functional analysis of AtHKT1 in Arabidopsis shows that Na+ recirculation by the phloem is crucial for salt tolerance. EMBO J. 22, 2004–2014. 10.1093/emboj/cdg207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Byrt C. S., Platten J. D., Spielmeyer W., James R. A., Lagudah E. S., Dennis E. S., et al. (2007). HKT1;5-like cation transporters linked to Na+ exclusion loci in wheat, Nax2 and Kna1. Plant Physiol. 143, 1918–1928. 10.1104/pp.106.093476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clough S. J., Bent A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cominelli E., Tonelli C. (2010). Transgenic crops coping with water scarcity. N. Biotechnol. 27, 473–477. 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cotsaftis O., Plett D., Shirley N., Tester M., Hrmova M. (2012). A two-staged model of Na+ exclusion in rice explained by 3D modeling of HKT transporters and alternative splicing. PLoS ONE 7:e39865. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davenport R. J., James R. A., Zakrisson-Plogander A., Tester M., Munns R. (2005). Control of sodium transport in durum wheat. Plant Physiol. 137, 807–818. 10.1104/pp.104.057307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Diatloff E., Kumar R., Schachtman D. P. (1998). Site directed mutagenesis reduces the Na+ affinity of HKT1, an Na+ energized high affinity K+ transporter. FEBS Lett. 432, 31–36. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00833-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fairbairn D. J., Liu W. H., Schachtman D. P., Gomez-Gallego S., Day S. R., Teasdale R. D. (2000). Characterisation of two distinct HKT1-like potassium transporters from Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Plant Mol. Biol. 43, 515–525. 10.1023/A:1006496402463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. FAO. (2009). FAO Land and Plant Nutrition Management Service. Available online at: http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/spush/.
  15. Garciadeblas B., Senn M. E., Banuelos M. A., Rodriguez-Navarro A. (2003). Sodium transport and HKT transporters: the rice model. Plant J. 34, 788–801. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01764.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gassmann W., Rubio F., Schroeder J. I. (1996). Alkali cation selectivity of the wheat root high-affinity potassium transporter HKT1. Plant J. 10, 869–882. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10050869.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Golldack D., Su H., Quigley F., Kamasani U. R., Munoz-Garay C., Balderas E., et al. (2002). Characterization of a HKT-type transporter in rice as a general alkali cation transporter. Plant J. 31, 529–542. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01374.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Haro R., Banuelos M. A., Senn M. A. E., Barrero-Gil J., Rodriguez-Navarro A. (2005). HKT1 mediates sodium uniport in roots. Pitfalls in the expression of HKT1 in yeast. Plant Physiol. 139, 1495–1506. 10.1104/pp.105.067553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Horie T., Brodsky D. E., Costa A., Kaneko T., Lo Schiavo F., Katsuhara M., et al. (2011). K+ transport by the OsHKT2;4 transporter from rice with atypical Na+ transport properties and competition in permeation of K+ over Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions. Plant Physiol. 156, 1493–1507. 10.1104/pp.110.168047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Horie T., Costa A., Kim T. H., Han M. J., Horie R., Leung H. Y., et al. (2007). Rice OsHKT2;1 transporter mediates large Na+ influx components into K+-starved roots for growth. EMBO J. 26, 3003–3014. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Horie T., Yoshida K., Nakayama H., Yamada K., Oiki S., Shinmyo A. (2001). Two types of HKT transporters with different properties of Na+ and K+ transport in Oryza sativa. Plant J. 27, 129–138. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01077.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang S. B., Spielmeyer W., Lagudah E. S., James R. A., Platten J. D., Dennis E. S., et al. (2006). A sodium transporter (HKT7) is a candidate for Nax1, a gene for salt tolerance in durum wheat. Plant Physiol. 142, 1718–1727. 10.1104/pp.106.088864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jabnoune M., Espeout S., Mieulet D., Fizames C., Verdeil J. L., Conejero G., et al. (2009). Diversity in expression patterns and functional properties in the rice HKT transporter family. Plant Physiol. 150, 1955–1971. 10.1104/pp.109.138008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. James R. A., Davenport R. J., Munns R. (2006). Physiological characterisation of two genes for Na+ exclusion in durum wheat: Nax1 and Nax2. Plant Physiol. 142, 1537–1547. 10.1104/pp.106.086538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jefferson R. A., Kavanagh T. A., Bevan M. W. (1987). GUS fusion: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 20, 3901–3907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jha D., Shirley N., Tester M., Roy S. J. (2010). Variation in salinity tolerance and shoot sodium accumulation in Arabidopsis ecotypes linked to differences in the natural expression levels of transporters involved in sodium transport. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 793–804. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02105.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Karimi M., Inze D., Depicker A. (2002). GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 193–195. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02251-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kato N., Akai M., Zulkifli L., Matsuda N., Kato Y., Goshima S., et al. (2007). Role of positively charged amino acids in the M2(D) transmembrane helix of Ktr/Trk/HKT type cation transporters. Channels 1, 161–171. 10.4161/chan.4374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lan W. Z., Wang W., Wang S. M., Li L. G., Buchanan B. B., Lin H. X., et al. (2010). A rice high-affinity potassium transporter (HKT) conceals a calcium-permeable cation channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 7089–7094. 10.1073/pnas.1000698107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Laurie S., Feeney K. A., Maathuis F. J., Heard P. J., Brown S. J., Leigh R. A. (2002). A role for HKT1 in sodium uptake by wheat roots. Plant J. 32, 139–149. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01410.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu W., Fairbairn D. J., Reid R. J., Schachtman D. P. (2001). Characterization of two HKT1 homologues from Eucalyptus camaldulensis that display intrinsic osmosensing capability. Plant Physiol. 127, 283–294. 10.1104/pp.127.1.283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-deltadeltaCT method. Methods 25, 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maser P., Hosoo Y., Goshima S., Horie T., Eckelman B., Yamada K., et al. (2002). Glycine residues in potassium channel-like selectivity filters determine potassium selectivity in four-loop-per-subunit HKT transporters from plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 6428–6433. 10.1073/pnas.082123799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mian A., Oomen R. J., Isayenkow S., Sentenac H., Maathuis F. J., Very A. A. (2011). Overexpression of a Na+ and K+-permeable HKT transporter in barley improves salt tolerance. Plant J. 68, 468–479. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04701.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moller I. S., Gilliham M., Jha D., Mayo G. M., Roy S. J., Coates J. C., et al. (2009). Shoot Na+ exclusion and increased salinity tolerance engineered by cell type-specific alteration of Na+ transport in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2163–2178. 10.1105/tpc.108.064568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Munns R., James R. A., Xu B., Athman A., Conn J. S., Jordans C., et al. (2012). Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na+ transporter gene. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 360–364. 10.1038/nbt.2120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Munns R., Tester M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Platten J. D., Cotsaftis O., Berthomieu P., Bohnert H., Davenport R. J., Fairbairn D. J., et al. (2006). Nomenclature for HKT transporters, key determinants of plant salinity tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 11, 372–374. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Plett D., Safwat G., Gilliham M., Moller I. S., Roy S., Shirley N., et al. (2010). Improved salinity tolerance of rice through cell type-specific expression of AtHKT1;1. PLoS ONE 5:e12571. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ren Z. H., Gao J. P., Li L. G., Cai X. L., Huang W., Chao D. Y., et al. (2005). A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat. Genet. 37, 1141–1146. 10.1038/ng1643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodriguez-Navarro A. (2000). Potassium transport in fungi and plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1469, 1–30. 10.1016/S0304-4157(99)00013-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rubio F., Gassmann W., Schroeder J. I. (1995). Sodium-driven potassium uptake by the plant potassium transporter HKT1 and mutations conferring salt tolerance. Science 270, 1660–1663. 10.1126/science.270.5242.1660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rubio F., Schwarz M., Gassmann W., Schroeder J. I. (1999). Genetic selection of mutations in the high affinity K+ transporter HKT1 that define functions of a loop site for reduced Na+ permeability and increased Na+ tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6839–6847. 10.1074/jbc.274.11.6839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rus A., Lee B. H., Munoz-Mayor A., Sharkhuu A., Miura K., Zhu J. K., et al. (2004). AtHKT1 facilitates Na+ homeostasis and K+ nutrition in planta. Plant Physiol. 136, 2500–2511. 10.1104/pp.104.042234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rus A., Yokoi S., Sharkhuu A., Reddy M., Lee B. H., Matsumoto T. K., et al. (2001). AtHKT1 is a salt tolerance determinant that controls Na+ entry into plant roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 14150–14155. 10.1073/pnas.241501798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rus A. M., Bressan R. A., Hasegawa P. M. (2005). Unraveling salt tolerance in crops. Nat. Genet. 37, 1029–1030. 10.1038/ng1005-1029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schachtman D. P., Schroeder J. I. (1994). Structure and transport mechanism of a high-affinity potassium uptake transporter from higher-plants. Nature 370, 655–658. 10.1038/370655a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Su H., Balderas E., Vera-Estrella R., Golldack D., Quigley F., Zhao C. S., et al. (2003). Expression of the cation transporter McHKT1 in a halophyte. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 967–980. 10.1023/A:1025445612244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sunarpi, Horie T., Motoda J., Kubo M., Yang H., Yoda K., et al. (2005). Enhanced salt tolerance mediated by AtHKT1 transporter-induced Na+ unloading from xylem vessels to xylem parenchyma cells. Plant J. 44, 928–938. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02595.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Takahashi R., Liu S., Takano T. (2007). Cloning and functional comparison of a high-affinity K+ transporter gene PhaHKT1 of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive reed plants. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 4387–4395. 10.1093/jxb/erm306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tholema N., Bakker E. P., Bakker E. P., Suzuki A., Nakamura T. (1999). Change to alanine of one out of four selectivity filter glycines in KtrB causes a two orders of magnitude decrease in the affinities for both K+ and Na+ of the Na+ dependent K+ uptake system KtrAB from Vibrio alginolyticus. FEBS Lett. 450, 217–220. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00504-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Uozumi N., Kim E. J., Rubio F., Yamaguchi T., Muto S., Tsuboi A., et al. (2000). The Arabidopsis HKT1 gene homolog mediates inward Na+ currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes and Na+ uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Physiol. 122, 1249–1259. 10.1104/pp.122.4.1249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yao X., Horie T., Xue A. W., Leung H. Y., Katsuhara M., Brodsky D. E., et al. (2010). Differential sodium and potassium transport selectivities of the rice OsHKT2;1 and OsHKT2;2 transporters in plant cells. Plant Physiol. 152, 341–355. 10.1104/pp.109.145722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (21.3KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (17.1KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (18.8KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (20.6KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (159.1KB, TIF)

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES