Abstract
Paragangliomas (PGL) and pheochromocytomas (PCC) are rare, usually benign tumors that originate from the neuroendocrine tissue along the paravertebral axis. Up to 35% of these tumors may be hereditary; they are associated with germline mutations in genes encoding subunits of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme complex in the context of the familial PGL syndromes, PGL1, 3 and 4 caused by mutations in the SDHD, SDHC and SDHB genes, respectively. Another familial PGL syndrome, PGL2, is caused by mutations in SDHAF2/SDH5, which encodes for a molecule that is an accessory to the function of the SDH enzyme and its SDHA subunit. Less frequently, mutations in the genes responsible for Von Hippel Lindau disease (VHL), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2), and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are also found in patients with hereditary PGL and PCC. Recently mutations were found in the SDHA subunit in a limited number of patients with PGL and/or PCC. The SDHB, SDHC and SDHD gene mutations (but not SDHA) can also be found in patients with PGL and/or PCC and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), also known as the Carney-Stratakis syndrome; SDHB mutations, in particular, may also predispose to thyroid and renal cancer, and possibly other tumors. A new gene was recently found to predispose to PGL and/or PCC when mutated is TMEM127. In this text, we provide an overview of the genetics of PGLs and related conditions with an emphasis on genetic risk assessment, prevention, and prognosis.
Historically, paragangliomas were thought of as benign tumors derived from specialized periocytes in the glomus complexes [1]; we now know that they originate from the chromaffin-negative glomus cells of the embryonic neural crest. These cells which migrated in close association with the autonomic nervous system ganglia are dispersed from the middle ear and the skull to the pelvic floor. Based on their anatomical distribution, and autonomic function, PGLs can be divided into two categories: (1) extra-adrenal tumors of the head and neck (HNPGLs) usually located at the carotid bifurcation, along the vagal nerve, in the jugular foramen, or in the middle ear space, and (2) tumors located below the neck which are most commonly found in the adrenal medulla (pheochromocytoma; PCC), urinary bladder, and the upper mediastinum. The incidence of clinically significant PGLs in the general population is approximately 1:30,000 to 1:100,000; in most cases, there is high morbidity but mortality remains low; early screening for familial cases and intervention are essential for good prognosis.
All types of PGLs and PCCs can occur in both sporadic and hereditary forms; approximately 7–10 to 50% of cases of PGLs are familial or present as bilateral or multiple primary tumors thus suggesting a genetic predisposition [2–5]; the proportion of PGLs due to an inherited predisposition is close to 35% [6]. Hereditary syndromes associated with PGLs include Von Hippel Lindau disease (VHL), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2), and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and the PGL syndromes (PGLs 1–4) and Carney-Stratakis syndrome or dyad. In NF1, adrenal PCCs occur in nearly 1% of patients [7, 8].
In general, extra-adrenal PGLs are associated with a greater risk of metastasis (23.9%) than adrenal PCCs (6.7%) [9–11]. Recent studies have identified an additional locus on chromosome 1p36 that also seems to predispose to PCCs (gene KIF1Bβ) [12, 13]. In 2000, mutations in the succinate dehyrogenase subunit D (SDHD) gene were found to be associated with hereditary PGLs [14]; this finding was followed by more mutations in SDH subunit genes that are also associated with hereditary PGLs. These are: three loci on chromosome 11 and 1, named PGL1 on 11q23 [15–18], PGL2 on 11q13.1 [19, 20] and PGL3 on 1q21–23 [21, 22]. Co-occurrence of both PGLs and PCCs is well documented in these syndromes [23]. SDHD (OMIM 602690) is responsible for PGL1 in familial PGLs [14], whereas two other subunits of this mitochondrial enzyme, SDHC (PGL3, OMIM 602413) and SDHB (PGL4, 1p36, OMIM 185470) are also associated with heritable PCC and/or PGL [24, 25]. The gene responsible for PGL2 was recently identified to be SDHAF2 (also known as SDH5), encoding a protein necessary for flavination of the A subunit of the SDH enzyme, SDHA (PGL2, 11q13.1, OMIM 601650) [26].
The genetic predisposition to HNPGLs and adrenal/extra-adrenal PGLs caused by heterozygous mutations by SDHD, SDHC, and SDHB is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion with age-dependent and incomplete penetrance [24, 25]. Mutations in the SDHD gene show a parent-of-origin effect (transmitted mostly from the father) [4, 15]. Despite this pattern of inheritance, SDHD shows bi-allelic expression in normal tissues and neural crest derived cancers with no promoter hyper-methylation in neuroendocrine tissues and related tumours [27]. In 2009, Hao et al. [26] evaluated a previously reported large Dutch family with an autosomal-dominant pattern of PGLs; they identified a mutation (G- to -A transition at nucleotide 232 of exon 2) in the SDHAF2 gene [26]. The pattern of inheritance seen in this family was suggestive of an SDHD-like inheritance. However, more studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism. More recently, mutations in SDHA were reported in a limited number of kindreds with PGL and/or PCC (see below).
Herited Predisposition to Paragangliomas: Epidemiology and Risk Assessment
In a recent report, we reviewed 95 studies of SDH germline mutations (57 in SDHD, 54 in SDHB and 13 in SDHC) in patients affected by tumours related to the ‘PGL/PCC syndromes’ [29]. This review included all published reports cited in the LOVD SDH gene databases by July 2008. For the purpose of the current chapter, we will focus primarily on epidemiology, management, risk assessment, and preventive measures.
Prevalence and Clinical Manifestations of PGL Syndromes
PGL syndromes involve either sympathetic paraganglia (mainly abdominal, adrenal or extra-adrenal) or parasympathetic organs in the head and neck region (mainly carotid bifurcation, the jugular bulb (the tympanic plexus on the promontory or the vagal nerve). Table 1 provides a summary of the prevalence of SDHB, SDHD, and SDHC mutations in sporadic cases of PGL, and table 2 provides a summary of SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD mutations in malignant tumors PGL-PCC. Sixty-one percent of SDHD-mutated index cases have a positive family history, while 69% of SDHB mutations carriers have an apparent negative family history. The few SDHC mutated cases described to date have a positive family history in 62.5% of the cases. Therefore, the prevalence of SDHB germline mutations among sporadic cases is somewhat higher than that one of SDHD. Very few sporadic cases have been reported with SDHC germline mutations (0.6%). The prevalence of SDHAF2/SDH5 mutations has not been well described to date; only one study has been reported so far [26, 28]. In summary, the prevalence of SDH mutations is as follows: sporadic extra-adrenal tumours (29.4%), malignant tumours (42.4%, table 2) and pediatric cases (29%) with strong preponderance of SDHB mutations in all categories (RET, NF1, VHL, MEN, SDHC, SDHB, SDHD). SDH mutations seem less frequent than RET and VHL in bilateral or familial adrenal PCCs. Higher SDH mutations frequencies can be found in cases affected by HNPGLs outside the area of the Low Countries (Belgium, The Netherlands and some adjacent lands). The general prevalence of mutations among sporadic, multiple and familial HNPGLs is 19, 71.4 and 96.3%, respectively, with a strong predominance of SDHD germline mutations among multiple (71.4%) and familial cases (68.4%), in accordance to the overall higher penetrance of mutations of this genes.
Table 1.
Tumor type | Number of cases | SDHB | SDHC | SDHD | References (population) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sporadic PHEO-PGL | 24 | 2 (8.3%) | 0 | 0 | Astuti et al., 2001 (English) |
Sporadic PHEO-PGL 14 adrenal, 4 extra-adrenal | 18 | n.d. | n.d. | 2 (11.1%) | Gimm et al., 2000 (German) |
Sporadic PHEO-PGL | 271 | 12 (4.4%) | n.d. | 11 (4%) | Neumann et al., 2002 (German, Polish) |
Adrenal | 241 | 6 (2.5%) | 7 (2.9%) | ||
Extra-adrenal | 30 | 6 (20%) | 4 (13.3%) | ||
Multiple tumours | 26 | 0 (0%) | 4 (15.4%) | ||
Sporadic PHEO-PGL | 304 | 16 (5.3%) | neg | 13 (4.3%) | Neumann et al., 2004 (German, Polish) |
Sporadic PHEO-PGL | 371 | 21 (5.7%) | 0 | 21 (5.7%) | Schiavi et al., 2005 (German, Polish and other countries) |
Sporadic PHEO-PGL including multiple tumors | 947 | 59 (6.2%) | neg | 25 (2.6%) | Erlic et al., 2009 (European-American) |
Sporadic PHEO-PGL | 84 | 8 (9.5%) | n.d. | 0 | Gimenez-Roqueplo et al., 2003 (French) |
Adrenal | 69 | 3 (4.3%) | |||
Adrenal benign | 57 | 1 (1.7%) | |||
Adrenal malignant | 12 | 2 (16.7) | |||
Extra-adrenal | 15 | 5 (33.3%) | |||
Sporadic PHEO-PGL | 258 | 18 (7%) | 0 | 3 (1.2%) | Amar et al., 2005 (French) |
Sporadic PGL >35 years, benign | 40 | 6 (15%) | 0 | 0 | Burnichon et al., 2009 (French) |
Sporadic PHEO-PGL | 213 | 1/47 (2%) | n.d. | 2/126 (1.6%) | Korpershoek et al., 2006 (Dutch) |
Sporadic PHEO-PGL | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Persu et al., 2008 (Belgian) |
PHEO collected anonymously | 35 | 1 (2.8%) | n.d. | 2 (5.7%) | Cascòn et al., 2004 (Spanish) |
Sporadic PHEO-PGL single tumors | 119 | 12 (10%) | 0 | 3 (2.2%) | Cascòn et al., 2009 (Spanish) |
Adrenal | 95 | 2 (2.1%) | 0 | 0 | |
Extra-adrenal | 24 | 10 (41.6%) | 0 | 1 (4.2%) |
Data on the prevalence of SDH germline mutations in sporadic non-syndromic PHEOs/PGLs have been derived from 13 studies in which the family history was clearly indicated. n.d. = Analysis not done.
Table 2.
Tumor type | Number of cases | SDHB | SDHC | SDHD | References (population) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Malignant PHEO-PGL | 44 | 13–18 (30–41%) | n.d. | n.d. | Brouwers et al., 2006 (NIH – USA) 5 cases with genetic variants |
Adrenal | 13 | 2 (15.4%) | |||
Extra-adrenal | 29 | 16 (55.2%) | |||
Uncertain | 2 | 0 (0%) | |||
Malignant PHEO-PGL | 9 | 1 (11%) | n.d. | 0 | Isobe et al., 2007 (Japanese) |
Adrenal | 5 | 0 | |||
Extra-adrenal | 4 | 1 (25%) | |||
Malignant PHEO-PGL | 28 | 6–7 (21–25%) | n.d. | 1–2 (3.6–7%) | Klein et al., 2008 (USA) 2 cases with genetic variants |
Adrenal | 12 | 0 | 2 (16.7%) | ||
Extra-adrenal | 16 | 7 (43.8) | 0 | ||
Malignant PHEO-PGL | 88 | 20 (22.7%) | n.d. | 1 (1.1%) | Erlic et al., 2009 (European-American) |
Malignant PHEO-PGL | 54 | 23 (42.6%) | n.d. | 0 | Amar et al., 2007 (French) |
Syndromic | 5 | 2 (40%) | |||
Sporadic | 49 | 21 (42.8%) | |||
Adrenal | 29 | 7 (24.1%) | |||
Extra-adrenal | 25 | 16 (64%) | |||
Malignant PGL-HNPGL | 49 | 36 (73.5%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (8.2%) | Burnichon et al., 2009 (French) |
Thoracic, abdominal, pelvis | 24 | 20 (83.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.1%) | |
HNPGL | 11 | 6 (54.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Multiple tumors | 14 | 10 (71.4%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (21.4%) | |
Malignant HNPGL | 33 | 13 (39.4%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (27.3%) | Neumann et al., 2009 (55% German, 45% other countries) |
Total malignant PHEO/PGLs | 305 | 112/305 (36.7%) | 15/261 (5.7%) | combined data |
Data on the prevalence of SDH germline mutations among malignant PHEOs/PGLs have been derived from 7 studies giving a general frequency of 42.4% with a marked predominance of SDHB mutations. In two studies, together with deleterious mutations, n.d. = Analysis not done.
We also reported on the analysis of the clinical manifestations of 689 published carriers of deleterious mutations in SDHB (264), SDHC (30) and SDHD (395) which led to the recognition of a genotype-phenotype correlation [see 29, for review] confirmed by other recent studies [30, 31]. In summary, median age at diagnosis of the first tumour is similar in SDHB and SDHD mutations carriers (32 and 33 years of age, respectively) and lower than that in SDHC mutation carriers (38 years). Approximately 25% of affected SDHB carriers have been diagnosed in the first and second decades of life while only 15% of SDHD mutation carriers and no SDHC mutation carriers have been diagnosed in the first decade of life. Multiple primary tumours are frequently observed in SDHD mutation carriers (79%, 167/211 with available information, 66.9% (87/130) while patients with SDHB and SDHC mutations have single tumours in 67 and 73% of the cases, respectively [30]. The most frequent phenotype associated with SDHB germline mutations is the development of extra-adrenal PGL (53%, 140/264, [30]), mainly abdominal (including pelvis and retro-peritoneum) but also thoracic, mediastinal and cervical. Twenty percent of cases present with adrenal PCC alone or associated with PGL (52/264) and another 20% of cases develop only HNPGL (52/264). On the contrary, SDHD-affected carriers presented with only HNPGL, single or multiple, in 78% of cases (305/395[YUN1]) while adrenal PCC and/or extra-adrenal PGL are the sole manifestations in 8% (31/395) and 1% (1/395) of cases. Overall 98% of SDHD affected patients develop a HNPGL during follow-up [30]. Among the 30 SDHC affected carriers in our review, 87% (26/30) presented with HNPGL alone (87.5% 14/16) [30] while PGL and PCC occurred more rarely. Finally, the prevalence of multiple tumours among SDHD mutation carriers is 30–74 vs. 12–28% in SDHB carriers. The risk for malignant tumours in SDHB carriers is 34–37.5% (37.5%, 36/96 [30]) versus 0–8% in SDHD carriers (3.1%, 4/130 [30]). The risk for malignancy for each type of tumor is based on reported cases; many studies are still analysing data on newer cases and these associated risks may change as more cases are reported. Data about the penetrance of SDH mutations (i.e. the risk of developing a tumor for an asymptomatic carrier) can be derived from three major studies [31–33] dealing with a total of 482 (42 + 82 + 358) SDHB and 128 (35 + 30 + 63) SDHD mutation carriers. SDHB mutation carriers have a life time cancer risk of 76 with 50% penetrance by age 35–45 years while SDHD carriers who inherited the mutation from their father seem to have a life time cancer risk of 85–100% with penetrance of 50% by age 30–40 years. Considering the tumour location, all studies recognized a higher risk for extra-adrenal paragangliomas in SDHB mutation carriers, and a higher risk for HNPGLs in SDHD mutation carriers. The lifetime risk of developing a renal tumor is higher in SDHB carriers (14 vs. 8% in SDHD) and mutations in all three genes can be associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumors too.
Management of Patients with PGL
Genetic testing of the different mutations associated with PGLs should be done based on the clinical presentation, medical history, family history, and previous testing of relatives. Guidelines for stepwise testing have been recently published and include a detailed family history, tumor size, location, prior history of surgeries, and clinical presentation [32–36]. However, the efficacy of these approaches in preventing disease has not been validated. The approach for managing and counseling PGL patients should include several one-on-one in-person sessions. These meetings can be divided in two categories:
Pre-test, to make sure that the person understands the implications of a positive test, and that he or she has enough and balanced information to be able to formulate a truly informed consent.
Post-test, if the person decides to proceed with testing: description of diagnosis, prognosis, assessment of understanding of current treatment and/or management, explanation of recurrence risk, testing of relatives, future options (including prenatal diagnosis for younger patients), and coping with the results.
These sessions are aimed at exploring the impact of the diagnosis on both affected and unaffected family members, assisting families and individuals as they adjust to the diagnosis, and to always be non-directive. These measures are important because of the uncertainty associated with these mutations and the inability to predict with accuracy the appearance and location of tumors, as well as their tendency to recur. The critical components of this process include ascertainment of medical and family history, determination and communication of risk (including risk of malignancy, assessment of risk perception, education regarding the genetics of PGL syndromes, and discussion of prevention and screening options). The prevention and screening options include urine, blood and imaging tests as indicated by the clinical presentation and the type of tumors. In addition to informed decision-making regarding genetic testing, primary outcomes of genetic counseling for PGL syndromes should include decreased worry, increased sense of control, and improved accuracy of risk perception. If left untreated, PGLs can result in significant clinical morbidity and mortality; early treatment and the identification of at risk individuals are thus imperative. The counseling approach highlighted above is aimed at improving adherence to screening recommendations, and thus decreasing morbidity and mortality.
The clinical manifestations of PGLs are broad and the majority of symptoms can mimic minor ailments (e.g. headaches, palpitations). Therefore, once a mutation has been identified individuals should be monitored closely with a lower threshold for further evaluation of symptoms by a physician. Many studies are on the way that will characterize further the genotype-phenotype correlations, with the hope that more specific guidelines can be generated for this patient population. More recently, mutations in SDHA were reported in a limited number of patients with PGL and/or PCC [37]. Additionally, a new gene was identified that predisposes to non-syndromic PGLs and/or PCC [38, 39]. The impact of these new discoveries in genetic risk counseling is currently unknown.
References
- 1.Winship T, Kloop CT, Jenkins WH. Glomus Jugularis Tumors. Cancer. 1948;1:441. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(194809)1:3<441::aid-cncr2820010310>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parry DM, Li FP, Strong LC, Carney JA, Schottenfeld D, Reimer RR, Grufferman S. Carotid body tumors in humans: genetics and epidemiology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982;68:573–578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Grufferman S, Gillman MW, Pasternak LR, Peterson CL, Young WG., Jr Familial carotid body tumors: case report and epidemiologic review. Cancer. 1980;46:2116–2122. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19801101)46:9<2116::aid-cncr2820460934>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.van der Mey AG, Maaswinkel-Mooy PD, Cornelisse CJ, Schmidt PH, van de Kamp JJ. Genomic imprinting in hereditary glomus tumours: evidence for new genetic theory. Lancet. 1989;ii:1291–1294. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91908-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sobol SM, Dailey JC. Familial multiple cervical paragangliomas: report of a kindred and review of the literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;102:382–390. doi: 10.1177/019459989010200413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Drovdlic CM, Myers EN, Peters JA, Baysal BE, Brackmann DE, Slattery WH, 3rd, Rubinstein WS. Proportion of heritable paraganglioma cases and associated clinical characteristics. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1822–1827. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200110000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maher ER, Eng C. The pressure rises: update on the genetics of pheochromocytoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:2347–2354. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.20.2347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bausch B, Borozdin W, Mautner VF European-American Phaeochromocytoma Registry Study Group. Germline NF1 mutational spectra and loss-of-heterozygosity analyses in patients with pheochromocytoma and neurofibromatosis type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2784–2792. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Amar L, Servais A, Gimenez-Roquelpo AP, Zinzindohoue F, Chatellier G, Plouin PF. Year of diagnosis, features at presentation, and risk of recurrence in patients with pheochromocytoma or secreting paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:2110–2116. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Khorram-Manesh A, Ahlman H, Nilsson O, et al. Long term outcome of a large series of patients surgically treated for pheochromocytoma. J Intern Med. 2005;258:55–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goldstein RE, O’Neill JA, Jr, Holcomb GW, 3rd, et al. Clinical experience over 48 years with pheochromocytoma. Ann Sug. 1999;229:755–764. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199906000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schlisio S, Kenchappa RS, Vredeveld LC, et al. The kinesin KIF1Bbeta acts downstream from EglN3 to induce apoptosis and is a potential 1p36 tumor suppressor. Genes Dev. 2008;22:884–893. doi: 10.1101/gad.1648608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yeh IT, Lenci RE, Qin Y, et al. A germline mutation of the KIF1B beta gene on 1p36 in a family with neural and non-neural tumors. Hum Genet. 2008;124:279–285. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0553-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287:848–851. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Heutink P, van der Mey AG, Sandkuijl LA, et al. A gene subject to genomic imprinting and responsible for hereditary paragangliomas maps to chromosome 11q23-qter. Hum Mol Genet. 1992;1:7–10. doi: 10.1093/hmg/1.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Heutink P, van Schothorst EM, van der Mey AG, et al. Further localization of the gene for hereditary paragangliomas and evidence for linkage in unrelated families. Eur J Hum Genet. 1994;2:148–158. doi: 10.1159/000472358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Baysal BE, Farr JE, Rubinstein WS, et al. Fine mapping of an imprinted gene for familial nonchromaffin paragangliomas, on chromosome 11q23. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:121–132. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Milunsky J, DeStefano AL, Huang XL, et al. Familial paragangliomas: linkage to chromosome 11q23 and clinical implications. Am J Med Genet. 1997;72:66–70. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19971003)72:1<66::aid-ajmg14>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mariman EC, van Beersum SE, Cremers CW, van Baars FM, Ropers HH. Analysis of a second family with hereditary non-chromaffin paragangliomas locates the underlying gene at the proximal region of chromosome 11q. Hum Genet. 1993;91:357–361. doi: 10.1007/BF00217356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mariman EC, van Beersum SE, Cremers CW, Struycken PM, Ropers HH. Fine mapping of a putatively imprinted gene for familial non-chromaffin paragangliomas to chromosome 11q13. 1: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Hum Genet. 1995;95:56–62. doi: 10.1007/BF00225075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Niemann S, Steinberger D, Müller U. PGL3, a third, not maternally imprinted locus in autosomal dominant paraganglioma. Neurogenetics. 1999;2:167–170. doi: 10.1007/s100480050078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Niemann S, Becker-Follmann J, Nürnberg G, et al. Assignment of PGL3 to chromosome 1 (q21–q23) in a family with autosomal dominant non-chromaffin paraganglioma. Am J Med Genet. 2001;98:32–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sato T, Saito H, Yoshinaga K, Shibota Y, Sasano N. Concurrence of carotid body tumor and pheochromocytoma. Cancer. 1974;34:1787–1795. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197411)34:5<1787::aid-cncr2820340529>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Niemann S, Müller U. Mutations in SDHC cause autosomal dominant paraganglioma, type 3. Nat Genet. 2000;26:268–270. doi: 10.1038/81551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Astuti D, Latif F, Dallol A, et al. Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:49–54. doi: 10.1086/321282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hao HX, Khalimonchuk O, Schraders M, Dephoure N, Bayley JP, Kunst H, Devilee P, Cremers CW, Schiffman JD, Bentz BG, Gygi SP, Winge DR, Kremer H, Rutter J. SDH5, a gene required for flavination of succinate dehydrogenase, is mutated in paraganglioma. Science. 2009;28:1139–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.1175689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287:848–851. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Van Baars FM, Cremers CWRJ, van den Broek P, Veldman JE. Familial non-chromaffinic paragangliomas (glomus tumors): clinical and genetic aspects. Acta Otolaryng. 1981;91:589–593. doi: 10.3109/00016488109138545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pasini B, Stratakis CA. SDH mutations in tumorigenesis and inherited endocrine tumours: lesson from the phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndromes. J Intern Med. 2009;266:19–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02111.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Burnichon N, Rohmer V, Amar L, Herman P, et al. PGL. NET network. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:2817–2827. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ricketts CJ, Forman JR, Rattenberry E, et al. Tumor risks and genotype-phenotype-proteotype analysis in 358 patients with germline mutations in SDHB and SDHD. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:41–51. doi: 10.1002/humu.21136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Neumann HP, Eng C. The approach to the patient with paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:2677–2683. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Benn DE, Richardson AL, Marsh DJ, Robinson BG. Genetic testing in pheochromocytoma- and paraganglioma-associated syndromes. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1073:104–111. doi: 10.1196/annals.1353.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Erlic Z, Neumann HP. Diagnosing patients with hereditary paraganglial tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:741. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70204-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cascón A, López-Jiménez E, Landa I, Leskelä S, Leandro-García LJ, Maliszewska A, Letón R, de la Vega L, García-Barcina MJ, Sanabria C, Alvarez-Escolá C, Rodríguez-Antona C, Robledo M. Rationalization of genetic testing in patients with apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Horm Metab Res. 2009;41:672–675. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bertherat J, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP. New insights in the genetics of adrenocortical tumors, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Horm Metab Res. 2005;37:384–390. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Burnichon N, Brière JJ, Libé R, Vescovo L, Rivière J, Tissier F, Jouanno E, Jeunemaitre X, Bénit P, Tzagoloff A, Rustin P, Bertherat J, Favier J, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP. SDHA is a tumor suppressor gene causing paraganglioma. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:3011–3020. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Qin Y, Yao L, King EE, Buddavarapu K, Lenci RE, Chocron ES, Lechleiter JD, Sass M, Aronin N, Schiavi F, Boaretto F, Opocher G, Toledo RA, Toledo SP, Stiles C, Aguiar RC, Dahia PL. Germline mutations in TMEM127 confer susceptibility to pheochromocytoma. Nat Genet. 2010;42:229–233. doi: 10.1038/ng.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yao L, Schiavi F, Cascon A, Qin Y, Inglada-Pérez L, King EE, Toledo RA, Ercolino T, Rapizzi E, Ricketts CJ, Mori L, Giacchè M, Mendola A, Taschin E, Boaretto F, Loli P, Iacobone M, Rossi GP, Biondi B, Lima-Junior JV, Kater CE, Bex M, Vikkula M, Grossman AB, Gruber SB, Barontini M, Persu A, Castellano M, Toledo SP, Maher ER, Mannelli M, Opocher G, Robledo M, Dahia PL. Spectrum and prevalence of FP/TMEM127 gene mutations in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. JAMA. 2010;304:2611–2619. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]